Top 10 Longest Range Passenger Aircraft In The World (2021)

Рет қаралды 118,352

2 жыл бұрын

Aircraft are built to travel vast distances quickly. But just how far can an aircraft fly, and which aircraft can fly the longest? Have a guess and see how right you are. Boeing and Airbus take pride in manufacturing some of the world's longest range airliners. The longest range jetliner in service is the Airbus A350 XWB Ultra Long Range, capable of flying up to 18,000 km (9,700 nmi). The A380 is capable of flying 14,800 km (8,000 nmi) with 544 passengers. The A350-900 can fly 15,000 km (8,100 nmi) with 325 passengers.
(FOR COPYRIGHT ISSUES, PLEASE CONTACT US BY EMAIL - thebuzz938@gmail.com)

Пікірлер: 138

@djonymorais 2 жыл бұрын

Man these numbers are waaaay off!!! So the B777-300ER is 73 meters long, not 63, that’s the -200? The A340-600 is 75 meters long, not 59 (That’s the A330-200’ length by the way). The A350-900 is 66 meters, and the -1000 is 72 meters long, and so on…. Even the ranges are a bit off!!!

@alexhodgkinson618 2 жыл бұрын

Agreed mate. Someone needs to do a bit more homework before making these videos 🤦‍♂️ I flew a 777-300ER from Miami to Dubai recently which was an 8293 mile flight so according to the 7823 mile range that is told in this video I’m surprised I never felt the bump as we crashed into the ground 470 miles short of Dubai 😂😂

@johniii8147 2 жыл бұрын

There were a lot of inconsistencies in the numbers

@emilioacosta585 2 жыл бұрын

they just googled it up and posted the first shit that popped on the screen lol

@dubrovink66 2 жыл бұрын

In stead of reading Wikipedia you can now listen to it.

@proscreens2137 2 жыл бұрын

787-8 is not 209 feet. Why do you even bother making videos when you cant get simple basic facts correct. I wont watch your videos any more because I cannot trust your data.

@westhavenor9513 2 жыл бұрын

Please go back and redo your homework. Accuracy counts.

@ThePhoenix198 2 жыл бұрын

Agree. Actually there's more inaccurate data than good stuff

@Sicario48monster 2 жыл бұрын

Nice

@RamakrishnanSRM 2 жыл бұрын

Range information is all wrong.

@shamanbhattacharyya9285 2 жыл бұрын

I think that some of the data in the video is wrong

@christopherhennessey8991 2 жыл бұрын

The Airbus 340-600 is actually 247 feet long and the Airbus 350-1000 is actually 242 feet long.

@arno222444 2 жыл бұрын

And how many stones does it weight please?

@Andypratt197 3 ай бұрын

3:49. I think you wrong, the range of 787-9 is the 5th longest range with 14,200 km before a380. 4:57. And the range of 777-200lr is the 3rd one with 15,843 km before the A340-500.

@sudhendugupte7562 2 жыл бұрын

WOW!Thanks

@slike601 2 жыл бұрын

set your dreams high 💯🔥

@brigittelehmann9749 2 жыл бұрын

Very interesting love flying

@maheshajnkya 2 жыл бұрын

Hi requesting you to kindly check the lengths of each aircraft along with their range. Thanks.

@tinykingdom4494 2 жыл бұрын

A350-1000's length is shorter than B787-8! Are you serious??

@jakelacaden6422 2 жыл бұрын

True

@rimu55555 Жыл бұрын

so a 380 can carry a whole small village population, lol

@cykablyatman9677 2 жыл бұрын

Can you please ban the user called Squidolf Tentler from your channel? He is spamming and harassing others

@adrianbriggs7028 2 жыл бұрын

Who writes this crap.. almost zero of this information is correct.

@BenyoSid 2 жыл бұрын

Cool Hi Buzz

@rajpawar9343 2 жыл бұрын

Passenger planes now challenging fighter jets.

@jetaddicted 2 жыл бұрын

They did better than fighter jets by far: Concorde, able to carry 100+ passengers and their luggage and sustain Mach 2 for almost three hours ;)

@rajpawar9343 2 жыл бұрын

Yeah so sad those planes failed and are now history.

@bhuvanes5990 2 жыл бұрын

Hi Buzz,😶🤗

@MrJimmymapua 2 жыл бұрын

So much errors in lengths and capacity. How can a A340-600 only be 194 ft while a -500 is 222 ft per your info????‽

@CausticLemons7 2 жыл бұрын

Forgot to write "Capacity" for the #1 spot. I think it would be helpful if you added fuel or passenger efficiency to the stats.

@portuguesnomundo 2 жыл бұрын

Nice video

@starkfuture1057 Жыл бұрын

An additional metric that would have made sense of a lot of things is the approximate cost per mile or per hour.

@hariomtalreja3101 2 жыл бұрын

Isn't the A340 600 75 meters long

@viktorfeigl4053 2 жыл бұрын

You are right and b777-300 is 73.7m long instead of 63

@djonymorais 2 жыл бұрын

And the A350-1000 is about 73 meters long, slightly shorter than the B777-300ER. The numbers on this video are way off.

@viktorfeigl4053 2 жыл бұрын

That's right.@@djonymorais

@nikiforospetrakis2260 2 жыл бұрын

I am afraid your figures are wrong. For example 340-600 is not shorter in length but is longer than 340-500. You have to look them again.

@geotrooper2179 2 жыл бұрын

MOST OF THE RANGES TOLD HERE ARE WRONG :( for example Boeing 787-8's range is 13,530 kms and not 15,200 kms :( even Airbus A350-1000 range is told wrong ...it's 16,100 kms and not 14,800 kms :(

@dinbee4611 2 жыл бұрын

Images of the aircraft seems different than their length description. Also your range basis is not on fuel consumption but on fuel capacity obviously those with more fuel can travel further.

@ryandymond2900 2 жыл бұрын

Lots of wrong information. For example, the range of the 787-9 is about 14000 km while the video said it was over 15000 km. Another example, the video said the range of the A350-1000 is almost 15000 km, the actual range is 16000 km.

@odzergaming 2 жыл бұрын

the 787-9 range is 15320km

@BoneyMcBones 2 жыл бұрын

you wrote the range for the A350-900 Instead of the a350-1000 LMAO

@johnagazim4199 Жыл бұрын

Actual top speed for the A350-1000 is 590 mph, not 683 mph (Mach 0.85)

@003geclipse 3 ай бұрын

top speed is 683 mph and cruise speed is561 mph.

@alexandrosandreou8585 2 жыл бұрын

A lot of these stats are wrong and i don't understand why you can very easily find the actual number by a quick Google search

@ThePhoenix198 2 жыл бұрын

Because they're lazy, and not too bothered about accuracy just so long as the video is published on time and mugs (like us) click on it. Then comment ...

@odin.9571 2 жыл бұрын

Next - top 10 anti radiation missiles.

@cykablyatman9677 2 жыл бұрын

Bro did you report squidolf

@odin.9571 2 жыл бұрын

@@cykablyatman9677 yes

@elitedima9672 2 жыл бұрын

@@odin.9571 nice thanks man

@maurorafaelrodriguespaixao1915 2 жыл бұрын

Muitos dados errados nesse vídeo

@cynettacynclaire9594 2 жыл бұрын

The video demonstrates pure laziness with its inconsistent switching between metric and US units of measurement. Most of the engines' thrust are expressed in pounds, but you toss out kilo newtons to demonstrate incompetence. While you are consistent expressing range kilometers, you are not with converting to miles! Statute miles or nautical miles?

@Desire123ification 2 жыл бұрын

Four engines and three engines planes are eclipsed by twin engines - Very unfortunate!

@ThePhoenix198 2 жыл бұрын

I'm puzzled. Why "unfortunate"?

@andrewstorm8240 2 жыл бұрын

777 keeps proving itself

@hanskupperkull914 Жыл бұрын

777-200lr range is 15 843 KM not 17 395 KM

@Dragonslavey Жыл бұрын

Only boeing and airbus😁

@npaladin2000 2 жыл бұрын

I'm having so much trouble placing the accent for some reason, and I'm probably going to kick myself if I ever do figure it out.

@charfras4767 2 жыл бұрын

asian (chinese or vietnamese)

@ThePhoenix198 2 жыл бұрын

Sounds computer-generated to me

@karmansingh2918 2 жыл бұрын

I can't the a350-1000 range =16,100km where as in the video it says the range is 14,800 km.this should put the 1350-1000 in 3rd place.

@PoLaRG1fz Жыл бұрын

A350-1000 range is 16,100km

@ph5740 2 жыл бұрын

The A340-600 is 75 meters long?

@Aviationlanka27 2 жыл бұрын

Fake information

@christopherhennessey8991 2 жыл бұрын

777 300 ER is actually 242 feet long not 209 feet long.

@gasviation9077 2 жыл бұрын

so the a340-600 is shorter than the 787-8 you see what im doing here

@Barolo818 2 жыл бұрын

prefer 787 for long-haul

@Cingearth 2 жыл бұрын

777-200lr is the longest flight in the world flying from Hong Kong to london via usa 22 hrs plus !

@BoneyMcBones 2 жыл бұрын

Isn't the longest non-stop flight Sydney to London (23 hours nonstop)?

@odzergaming 2 жыл бұрын

@@BoneyMcBones no its Paris to Auckland 27 hours

@BoneyMcBones 2 жыл бұрын

@@odzergaming that flight isnt non-stop though

@odzergaming 2 жыл бұрын

@@BoneyMcBones it was never in scheduled passenger service and the London to Sydney was a test flight

@BoneyMcBones 2 жыл бұрын

@@odzergaming it will be scheduled though, qantas ordered a350-1000s for the flights (sydney to london and new york)

@silverman785 2 жыл бұрын

Lengths and ranges are waaaaay off

@jiwang28 Жыл бұрын

the longgest range plane is a330 with 10000nm

@yourfirstgrandad1816 Жыл бұрын

Stats are wrong my friend

@boriszec7256 2 жыл бұрын

Greska! Duzinu aviona ste pogresno predstavili. I to za desetak metara krace!

@michealktrevor 2 жыл бұрын

This is the problem with some of these youtube accounts that are after clout. Everything about this video is wrong.

@Leon-Hardt 2 жыл бұрын

Amazing that the A350-1000 can carrie 10 more passenger than A340-600 with only two engines.

@alderlake12th 2 жыл бұрын

yes a350 is newwer than a340 BUT WAIT A340-600 IS LESS CAPACITY THAN A340-500????

@mansurazeez2229 2 жыл бұрын

What! A350-1000 with a speed of 683 mph? At 36,000ft that speed is beyond Mach 1 (660mph/36,000ft)! A350-1000 is supersonic?

@odzergaming 2 жыл бұрын

It has to have a ground speed of Mach 1 to be supersonic not airspeed

@mansurazeez2229 2 жыл бұрын

@@odzergaming yes sir, the 683mph must the speed at sea level or Mach 0.89 or below the speed of sound. The speed of sound at sea level is 760 mph or 1231 km/h. Thx for pointing out.

@Ihat-b2j 2 жыл бұрын

Im surprised the 4 hairdryers with wings have a longer range then the 777

@falconaviation1957 Жыл бұрын

A340 is a gem

@Ihat-b2j Жыл бұрын

@@falconaviation1957 those engines are so much smaller in person then you would think from the picture. Im genuinely impressed with ab to make it work so well

@iamr4mi 4 ай бұрын

@@Ihat-b2j the a340-600 and a340-500 use rr Trent 550s, not cfm 56s

@dodoubleg2356 2 жыл бұрын

Once again, 'The Buzz' gets it wrong...Didn't their editors find it odd that all the aircraft listed had a speed of 530mph - 600mph, but listed the A350 at 683mph?!?🤔 C'mon guys.

@shrodingerscat8940 2 жыл бұрын

They probably take a article and make a video from it

@BGCflyer 2 жыл бұрын

Many mistakes here…

@YelpBullhorn 2 жыл бұрын

With so many mistakes this video is nothing more than meaningless twaddle.

@stevexie2705 2 жыл бұрын

Other than the obvious errors in facts, the speaker's voice sounds either its a robot or an Asian trying too hard to speak British English

@albertozisbeto2890 2 жыл бұрын

16000 km range is stupid noua zelan 40000 km distance romania 5 aircraft finish

@odin.9571 2 жыл бұрын

Good video 👍

@michaeldelorenzo2700 2 жыл бұрын

good specs bad scale of air craft

@youtubechangemynamewhy 2 жыл бұрын

A350-1000 is supersonic 🤣🤣🤣

@tavolo2969 2 жыл бұрын

No, it’s not, 1099km/h is not Mach

@youtubechangemynamewhy 2 жыл бұрын

Jet don’t fly at sea level, google sea level?

@mspk6714 Жыл бұрын

Wrong detailing

@daveogarf 2 жыл бұрын

LOSE THE ROBO-VOICE!

@dionsanchez152 2 жыл бұрын

if you're going to post vids. i kindly ask you to get the correct facts before you do

@nassersu9106 2 жыл бұрын

This is totally wrong

@ngoclethibich799 2 жыл бұрын

The max capacity of Airbus A350-1000 is 450

@thgsr09 2 жыл бұрын

480 actually.

@Thunder-Ian 6 ай бұрын

this is wrong.

@et3865 2 жыл бұрын

the A350ULR cannot carry 300 passengers, not even close. The ULR in use today don't even have Economy seats, just business and premium economy. It is barely 260 passengers, a little research would have helped but this is just lazy video. Thummbsdown all the way, I won't even watch this channel anymore

@albertozisbeto2890 2 жыл бұрын

Wow 😡