The updated version of NSM have 250 km range (depending on configuration) (JSM variant can be configured from 185 km to 555 km), and are in service in Norway, Poland, USA and in future with Malaysia, Germany and India!

India is developing more advanced version of BRAHMOS with more reach and higher speed and stealth.. in joint venture with RUSSIA

@@prakharsachan nope. India is developing an extended range version of Brahmos of 800km and speed Mach 4. Russia will not help us for Brahmos 2 as it will become the only nearly invincible anti-ship hypersonic missile and Russia does not want to stop its buisness. We will have to do it on our own.

@@naveenarora6467 Please do the needful and CC every manager in the company.

@@N3eur0 lol IT indust

особенно против невооружённых буксиров

@@devilinyoursoul yeah the unarmed tug Kirov🤡🤣🤣

@@richgilmour5924 🤡🤡 Когда был написан мой комментарий, ракетой «Нептун» был уничтожен только безоружный буксир. Через год лучше ответь в следующий раз.

Damn effective against ~50 year old cruisers designed before the first sea-skimming missile.

​@@definitelyfrank9341 and the moskva 😂😂😂

This video was posted 3+ years ago, long before a Neptune, if that’s truly what it was, that damaged a ship to the point of sinking same.

since it said top 5 so maybe these 5 platforms are much better than neptune! And neptune dont come up to top 5

This comment is similarly ridiculous to comments that brag about F-22's kill on that Chinese balloon. Two neptunes (3 years old) sank a ~50 year old cruiser which is part of a class designed before the first sea-skimming missiles (neptune is a sea-skimming missile).

Neptune is anti tank I think

Neptune its subsonic missile And upgrade soviet X35 missile

Ok brother we buy bhramos missile to sink and destroy chinise ship at spratly island and now president of India visit now in the philippines in our country for aggrement and defence cooperation and bussiness aggrement..iNdia and philippines are Old allies almost 75 years of strong friend allies.

@@kinofrias8616 yup brother, And worries will continue for china bcz hypersonic Brahmos MK2 is under trials which will have speed of 7 mach and of range 800km. Soon will sink china Together. 😎😎

@@kinofrias8616 I heard about the ties between Philippines and India yesterday on the President's visit to your country. You also has military treaty signed with USA. China will soon suffer for what he is doing. Long live the friendship!!

@lybrinth 22 24 Ur msg is not showing here, but I read it in notification popup.... See! I know Philippines is close to USA as I have mentioned above. & I also clearly mentioned that Russia's concern is must. India & Philippines talk are being held from months on acquiring Brahmos but I never heard of Russia's intervention yet. Bcz Russia would have expressed it the very moment.

Russia is probably concerned since the Brahmos is a variant of the russian produced P-800 Oniks (Ruby) missile, a very nice missile with a powerful ramjet. The Brahmos modification is supposed to be an improvement so it would be interesting to see how it turns out.

was about to make this comment. Maybe the video is true about the best. But that still on paper and not battle proven (which often heavy more than anything).

And it efficacity was approved by Royal Navy 😃

Exocet is well battle proven whereas Harpoon has proven to miss. I am glad Harpoon was not mentioned.

The Exocet isn't talked about compared to other non-combat proven weapon systems. I'm sure no ship wants to see it on its radar

@@parrotbrand2782 Exocet is old school. It only has a 70 kilometer maximum range. Ships today can detect enemy transport beyond 250 miles. Exocet was used successfully a long time ago, that is, in the Falklands War.

IKR

Battleships can put a 2700 lb warhead on target every 30 seconds for each 0f 9 cannon tubes.

👍

Penguin was also adopted by the US for a similar purpose.

Is a piece of garbage.

@@SCP-5000 just like ur country

@@tritonx5433 You don't even know what my country is.

@@SCP-5000 bruh only weak and countries who have achieved nothing themselves make such statements.

@@SCP-5000 so i dont need to know I can make out

Outdated system

Yess broo its old

But still good

@Drew Peacock The UK and France are jointly developing a missile called Perseus to meet the anti shipping roll. The system can be ship or aircraft launched. The NSM from Kongsbergh is being adapted to fit the internal weapons bay of F35 making it a deadly combination.

@Drew Peacock the Scalp/ Storm Shadow missile is used as the base for MdCN, their is a torpedo tube capable launch mode and range is beyond 1000k. Bramhos, Kalibr , YJ18 etc have to be regarded as vulnerable to long range interceptors like SM 6 and certainly Aster and the more common SM 2 would be perfectly capable of interception. NSM on the other hand uses stealth and low level to approach targets.

CIWS: *ZZZZZZZZZZZZZRRRRRRRRRTTTT* now what un manned kamikaze's?

naaah

Saab 9000 aeroback

Agree. LRASM is useful but I think it's too slow and hard to break modern defence system.

Bur bramhos is supersonic

@@MJLee-wl6kt bhramos also have a range of 500 km And the new one have 800km for sea and the air one is being made which will have a range of 1500

@@MJLee-wl6kt its by far the most deadliest missile on that list. If you think about it. Unlike the bamos which can be targeted by missile defenses, its just flies really fast so you don't have enough time once it goes over the horizon to lock on and shoot. The LRASM nobody can lock on too in sea skimming mode and it can avoid, dodge enemy defenses. If you have an early warning radar or helicopter or some sort. You can lock on to the bravos missile hundreds of miles away before it even gets to the ship. Maybe it takes 1, maybe it takes 3 but you have the time to figure it out. The LRASM is so stealth that you can't even lock on to it. Not even once it gets over the horizon but only until its 3 or 5 miles away. Its still going high subsonic with a 1000 lbs warhead (much bigger than anything else on that list), plus its by far the most accurate and jam resistant on that list. Just think about it, you can't even get the LRASM on radar unless its super close. Bramos you can and you can from really far away, and its not even as close to being as accurate, (those types of missile are inherently in accurate)

@@madhurisaxena5215 Do you understand the problem with the Russian or Indian missile technology. You guys have way bigger missile than we do and all you do is just make it bigger to achieve more range and power, instead of actually improving fuel efficiency. The day the US decides to make their missile bigger is gonna be bad day for you (Russia). That big of a missile takes up too much space that could go to other missile that can also get though air defenses and is way more expensive. Also those last two are still in development. Another thing, the Brahmos 500km range is not a sea skimming mode.

India? Lmaoooo no. You developed a prototype that hardly works and even if it did you couldn’t afford to build it. No one cares about your third world military.

@Just some yeti with internet access your capita per Soldier is around 57k, which brings you in about level with countries like Ghana. Just as a comparison, first world European countries like France, Germany and the UK have a capita of around 350k $ per soldier. The US has around 750k $ per soldier. This is ofc not spent on the soldiers itself but it does show the budget in relation to the size of the military. India is number 4 in military spending, but you spend 71 billion for a military with over 1.2 mio personnel, compare that to, let’s say Germany, who have around 184k personnel or around 15% of India’s military, yet they spend 64 billion on their military or around 90% of India’s military spendings. Do you see the issue here? You just have a lot of men but they’re all poorly trained and poorly equipped. This is a common issue that we see in third world or developing nations like India. Quantity over quality, your leadership still hasn’t recognized that manpower isn’t that important anymore. North Korea also has a giant military and yet they would get absolutely crushed by any western nation.

@@FacitOmniaVoluntas. india send rover on mars in 74 million dollars, US do it with 650 million, both done the same thing, India is known for making quality product at low cost ,even martian film was 104million

@@FacitOmniaVoluntas. what a foolish way bro, you compare military power with per capita ,then your logic is, if India dismiss some soldiers India will be more powerful 😂 ,firstly Indian soldiers are paid very less compared to western soldiers ,now avoid soldiers compare weapons between these country, its availiable in youtube, India is ranked 4rth in military fire power index, these ranking is given by proper study and research (not from your whatsapp university)

@@oneworld4573 your country is a third world joke of a nation, I guarantee you that no one outside of India takes you serious

No one give shit

The Harpoon is fairly useless due to it's range. The LRASM is a far, far better weapon and has already pretty much replaced the Harpoon.

Elthenar .... Harpoon long needed a replacement. Obsolete depends on who your shooting.

And it has no problem destroying Russian ships

@@Elthenar The harpoon has a range of 180miles. That actually pretty good compared to other anti-ship missiles, espically submarine launched

@@snsproduc The best listed range I've ever seen is around 100-120 miles.

and brahmos kicked from the group

@Adolf Stalin source?

The enemy would just ignore them...

Are talking bout titanic?

AM39 Is old....currently the MM40 block 3 is in service

No because it failed badly killing 900 freindlys during iraqi freedom in a bizzare miss fire

@@dredre5521 Hum hum... : One failed to blow up, yet both hit the Stark Frigate. Missiles were also quite old, compared to supposedly much more advanced American forces. The missiles were older than the Frigate. Discarding the Exocet for one miss fire when other missiles presented have only demonstrated "efficiency" against unconventional targets (the Club for instance has never really been used against high tech Professional armies but rather against Daesch arseholes), is not an honnest answer. Exocets are good weaponry and have been upgraded over the years. They are smart missiles, hard to intercept, with a very long range, possible launch from many platfors (ships, planes, helicopter submarines in diving etc...) I seriously hope for you you'll never be in a ship targetted by an Exocet. This missile is one of the biggest fear of any military captain in the world. Even the French admit that they are not really capable of intercepting their own missile. I know it's common to make fun of the French, but in this instance, I am not sure it's wise.

Brahmos ER has speed close to 4 mach

Chod na bhai kya in jhatu logo ko bata raha ye laude western tech hi superior manege baki sub chutiye hai inte samne

@@dipayansaha4101 no, it's mach 5.

Indeed

It's a jointly developed missile by both India and Russia with India holding 51% stake.

Yhea but with french exocet

I would say jai hind....its made by india,not by sriram

The US would sink them with our seawolf subs

probably tear the US to little shreds

I believe the Chinese are developing more submarines if im not mistaken. Subs to counter US carrier groups

Si loco, se olvidaron del Exocet y eso que el misil se llevó a la tumba a varios buques NATO

Missiles like the Exocet are nice indeed, they can be carried by both ships and aircraft (from my knowledge), and have been combat proven (as far as I know). If this was a top 10, I wouldn't be surprised to see it there (or a different top 5 even).

Mientras estos lo probaron en buques chatarra Exocet rotura de cola ala Royal Navy aprobado

Its just got 180kilometers ... Too low range

@@tzonhose1993 but good luck to stop that one lol

@@Assassunn I actually prefer Exocet to Harpoon but I wish the range was extended to atleast 300km especially because it can be fired from a submarine

@@tonymerc4173 the manufacturer might be working on a new anti ship missile I guess

The LRSAM is the one true threat, with it's massive war head and stealth low observable profile and being air launched. It far surpasses Brahmos in probable hit to kill capabilities. Brahmos is fast, yes. But it's large non-stealth profile and smoke belching engine would be seen long before engagement and countered by anti-missile missile-systems. *edit* for grammatical boo-boo's - again

@@ditzydoo4378 there are only two superpowers in the world. 1.usa2.russia. neither china(with its low quality cheap weapons ofc) or us(india with brain drain and too much of VIP culture) can even touch u guys in two decades. And usa is ahead of russia in most of the cases including economy but russia is also better in some things. Overall, much love amd respect for the america and russia.

No they can't. These are SMART missiles. They use ship signatures for target aquisition. Even the old Penguin missiles from the 70s wouldn't be tricked by a tanker. Not that it matters; tankers are a vital part of a fleet. Sink one and the time a fleet can operate in the area is reduced considerably.

Rtyuhjkyjghg

Exocet is smaller compared to this lot so more unlikely to be tracked on radar.

davidtsw there ready for any knew war bro

_was ist ze battleship amr_

I doubt 1 or 2 of these modern missiles can sink a WW2 battleship. Modern warships are like tin can compared to WW2 battleships. I think at least 4-5 missiles are needed to destroy a modern carrier.

I think Chinese anti-ship missiles are much better than all of these.

@@user-qc3xe4ms8e only in paper work

@fiendin281 Like UR jesus???

Not deployed

Not sure about that anymore , as far as I know . Exocet is subsonic , and a sea skimmer . Modern Gattling guns , and even 4.5 inch or Otto melara 76mm main guns can radar lock onto it . These hyper sonic , mach 3 weapons concern me

Hypersonics have speed, but no maneuverability. A choice ...Exocets are very difficut to detect, even by the most up-to-date radars, and are able of very complex trajectories to avoid counter-measures, and have their own integrated radars, which come into action only some few seconds before the impact ...

Tomahawk won't fit in F35 weapons bay, NSM will and it's cheaper.

Its USN affiliated BS designed to massage Murkans (bruised) egos. Ruskies make the best AShMs bar none, as their mission for decades has been to sink carriers and they have developed weapons for that purpose. The West has relied on comparatively weak weapons like harpoons, tomahawks and variants. The west has absolutely nothing to equal the Zircon/Tsirkon so this commentators just ignores its existence else it would spoil his narrative 😛

too expensive and way to big

Useless against Ukrainian farm boys.

Brahmos can launch from air, water, land and underwater

True, but I think the narrator meant "ship", not "battleship" as the title says.

During nuclear warhead testing in the late 40s and 50s, several battleships were used as ground zero for hydrogen bombs, they suffered damage to the superstructure. Carriers also, some flight deck damage. But nukes against modern hardened warships, the warhead would have to detonate internally.

@@t5grrr 1. these were no hydrogen bombs 2. ground zero was an aircraft carrier 3. the bombs were detonated under water / airburst 4. if you would detonate a real thermonuclear warhead like 1MT+ on the deck of an battleship, the whole ship would vaporize instantly

a nuke would not have to and cruse missilesare nuke ready

hitting the bridge would probably do it

Missile intercepting missile are also good

wacky 101 yes they were good at one time but now we are in the age of the hypersonic missile and there's no defense against that .

@@roddychristodoulou9111 what about particle accelerator

wacky 101 this technology is still new and they are still working on it to perfect it , as far as I know it's too slow for hypersonic missiles .

@@roddychristodoulou9111 no India's kali 10000 will be able to destroy any hypersonic missile

Tell it!

syed ali Hussain That is what man kind has ALWAYS done

To maintain the balance of ecosystem

It’s unfortunate but...So long as there are men, so too will there be war.

Theres more than enough people living on this rock to justify a large scale war with civilians as the primary target on all sides. Such a war would probably *benefit* people (those left) as right now we have too few resources and far too many people on the planet.

cause its 15 years old

@@jeffdbmb its far older than that but it's still deadly.