Agreed.

I prefer the 1998 Mercedes-Benz AMG CLK-GTR. It can go 200 mph which is not slow by any means also sounds amazing and looks so nice

it always will be.

Ferrari f40 it has no equal

F40 is UGLY.

I don't think anyone has driven this car like that... incredible talent that Tiff.

I like it better at 5:32... The speed the background goes by is unbelievable.

Remember every part of this from the mid 90's

alobpreis Remeber watching that as a child thinking fuuuuck . Watch this vid probally every month .

I live for that part of this video he is absolutely hauling a** and I doubt we will ever see a McLaren driving so hard

+Umaxen 00 also the Veyron weights in at 4000 elephants.

and 500+ kilos overweight. but the bugatti is very easy to drive and its very reliable car.

The F1 was so reliable that it won Le Mans 1,2,3 in the first year they ran. That's a 24 hour race with stops just for gasoline, brakes and tires VS Porsche, Ferrari and all other factory cars. The Veyron? it would last about 1/2 hour....

Umaxen 00 i think that F1 is the best car too but bugatti has some advantages

I will never have the cash to buy either one, however I have found a GREAT engine to implant into a small civic hatchback. It's the K24 (Accord engine) built by Honda exclusively for racing. They use it in the Ariel atom. 2.4 liter with 230 hp. Ariel also uses a K24 Turbo engine (produced by?) that makes 365 hp. In a Civic, these engines would probably result in crazy performance.

+Geelar Gotta agree...the show was very much about the cars. It's much more about the hosts now (or was...with Clarkson gone now maybe we'll see a return to the show's roots)

Chris Ducat I don't think so, when the executives see that it brings in less ratings they'll try and go back to the Clarkson way again. Sad to say thats most likely.

couldn't agree more... the old Top Gear honestly was the best.

@@beefen7921 Well, old top gear got cancelled, and it was only Clarkson's promise to make it more entertaining that got it green-lit again.

He is working that f1

+Bhong666 I don't understand why the BBC didn't give Clarkson a stab in the back and hire Tiff as the new presenter of Top Gear that would have really put 2 fingers up to Clarkson and viewers would have enjoyed watching Tiff a lot more than bloody Chris Evans

+Christopher Michael Ayres i agree, but maybe he gave the BBC the finger about it too because it was sorta his opportunity to turn the tables on them sorta like what they did to him. plus im not sure Fifth Gear would let him go or him letting go of them if he is the chief.

+Christopher Michael Ayres Evans is a character i didnt like even on his interview on top gear with his lap times and when they James went to his house to drive his California or whatever i loved his line of white Ferraris and his California but it's just him i find absolutely stupid. his jokes he made on the episode were terrible and well Sabine Smitz drove around Laguna Seca with him in the passenger seat and he puked from the experience. sure she's a damn good driver and it's probably rough in the car but you couldnt make me puke over something like that even if you put everything you had into it. when i saw that (spy shots from the upcoming season of Top Gear) emerge i hated him even more. il still give them a shot though but 7 hosts to replace 3 sorta gives me the feeling they know the trio were their savior

+Patrick Pelletier I agree mate

For a roadcar, maybe. But this'll give you the ultimate goosebumps: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fNGAaLan0ZeagZs.html

@@heijxje Thanks pretty good. Cheers!

Jonathan Railing no its not, look up the history of top gear

True because the f1 requires pure driver skill. The bugatti is loaded with computers so clearly the f1 should be the professional racer's car

So the F40 isn't a supercar?

+dennis trident william the f 40 rocks!

***** ferrari f12 is a natural v12 with 730 hp lambo aventador 690 hp etc..i think what you mean to say is nothing has touched its top speed natural

***** again aventador does 0-60mph in 2.9 seconds naturally I think the F1 was 3.1? but yes its still the all round quickest car ever N/A

+Saif0412 And i don't think it will be ever a car like it again

Koenigsegg One:1? Pretty damn close

Not even, TVR Cerbera Speed 12

McLaren unveiled the Speedtail and Elvera

And then Gordon Murray introduces his brand-new t-50 manual V12 middle seat Supercar just today

I know this is an old comment, thought I should let you know that Mitsubishi had active aerodynamics on their 1990 GTO.

The slr had it before the bugatti tho

@@somedude9316 Yeah but Mitsubishi are not a premium car brand

@@christineayres5339 that makes it even more remarkable

@@christineayres5339 In the 1950s American cars had Aircon, Electric windows, electric seats, electronic light controls and even light detectors that would sit on the dash and automatically dip the lights once another car light were detected. Even airbags were created in the early 1970s. Auto innovation has been in decline for decades due to government interference.

BimmerMann while I agree with you the xj220 and the Porsche 959 are simply stunning in their own right

Are you excited about the T50?

You wouldn't need to 3 seats the wife And the child

Plot twist....he hates his family.

@@Dago342 Of course, we dunno much about his family. Maybe it is as worse as he says, maybe not. Could be joking.

Gerasimos Rico Perhaps the Noble M600 is the last, though the McLaren is the best.

The last and final fully analog supercar!

T50 has entered the chat

@@deejayyy1681 LOL 🤣

Gordon comes with his final hit.

Chris H carries Tiff's flame

***** In 1992 when the engine was ready, the S70 was the greenest engine of all of the V12 on the market. BMW continued the production to 1998 when new emission arrived. The cost to improve that engine to the new specification was to high. This partly disabled the F1 from production.

Becouse they weight lot more, and has worse airdynamics and comprehensive fans.

+Chris Molyneaux because modern supercars have downforce, and are geared for lower top speeds, and faster acceleration, shorter gearing, faster braking, faster cornering. It's absolutely easy to make a 600hp car go faster than an f1. Just make a car with super skinny tires with a hunkered down streamline car and stick a 600hp engine in it. Problem is it won't go around corners. A modern Z06 does 1.17g on the skidpad, while the F1 can only do .86.

***** The mika tested xp5 on both japan and on nurburgring. And yes the time is for stock road car F1. Not LM or GTR, which should be quicker than stock F1 on track.

***** There is no laugh matter. The exit speed of one of the last corner (Döttinger Höhe straight) over 2 km straight F1 can crack over 330 km/h. The gear ratios is the same on stock F1 like in LM car. The gearing of F1 is very suited for this track, 1th, 2th, 3th and 4th are very relatively short gears in F1. 5th and 6th gear is almost overun, but F1 still achieved very high rev speed on 6th gear. Many people complain about brakes in F1, but reality is they are bites really well on speed above 240 km/h not on the ''100km/h test'' measures same as F40 brakes are good on high speed, not low.

You are right in a way because the two are very different (both the F1 and Veyron, and the Apple Watch and Schaffhausen), but don't be tempted to denigrate the Apple Watch or Veyron, because they are just as great an achievement (more so in many ways) as what you are comparing them to.

@@OJB42 Apple watch is the stupidest thing on planet earth.

@King Brilliant Can you tell me why you have that opinion. I, and many other Apple watch users, love them!

@@bighands69 How long have you used one for to gain that opinion? And how do you explain the vast number of users who like them? Also, surely there must be at least *one* thing stupider! :)

@@OJB42 Because it is just a watch that connects to the phone. Everything the watch can do my phone can do. And they look like cheap plastic bits on the arm.

It is up there though, Credit for looking great even today.

Now ita around $20million

Mitchx42 very good. I would really like to meet you sometime brother seems like you actually know your stuff

***** well regardless what you put this car up against I would still bet my money on it winning something like the 24hr le mans. in my opinion all other cars would either not finish the race or fail to beat the mclarens lap times.

***** If in not wrong.....i think the McLaren F1 is still the fastest NA super car.

Pagani Zonda R will beat this.

Choua Vang and then catch fire or breakdown before the McLaren.

Pagani Zonda R is not road legal

doesnt it make a wonderful sound. urgh i want one soo bad. hell i want all of the ones in the world to be mine, that would be expensive as hell though

Rowan Atkinson sold his twice badly crashed F1 for £8m so yes it'd be very expensive! Also anyone lucky enough to own an F1 will be incredibly wealthy so not many would sell for any price.

David Paterson actually it sold for 16 million dollars. If the euro or whatever that currency is double that of the US dollar about a year or 2 ago then yea but i know for a fact it sold for 16 million. And yea he totalled it twice but he got it completely redone by Mclaren themselves just to the way it was done before so technically it never crashed (structurally) and nothing has changed on his from those crashes in terms of modifications the real cause for the low price is probably because he had over 40 000miles on it many years back even before the second crash. Sure the crashes definitely were taken into account but they really shouldnt have