Treason: A Potted History of the Law

Рет қаралды 20,233

Жыл бұрын

To explore “The Rise of Cleopatra” and more first-class history content subscribe to History Hit: access.historyhit.com/checkout...
I hope you enjoy this video and find it interesting!
Let’s talk treason…
Please subscribe and click the bell icon to be updated about new videos.
Also, if you want to get in touch, please comment down below or find me on social media:
Instagram: katrina.marchant
Twitter: @kat_marchant
TikTok: @katrina_marchant
Email: readingthepastwithdrkat@gmail.com
Intro / Outro song: Silent Partner, "Greenery" [ • Greenery - Silent Part... ]
SFX from freesfx.co.uk/Default.aspx
Linked videos and playlists:
Anne Boleyn and the Tower of London: • The Tower of London an...
Images (from Wikimedia Commons, unless otherwise stated):
Poster image and book jacket for Treason at The National Archives from: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/t... and shop.nationalarchives.gov.uk/...
Screenshots from the OED entry for "treason, n." OED Online. Oxford University Press, March 2023.
Photograph of the “Statute made at Westminster in the parliament holden in the Feast of Saint Hilary in the twenty fifth year of the reign of King Edward the Third” taken by me during my visit to the National Archives exhibition.
Portrait of King Henry VII by an unknown Netherlandish artist (1505). Held by the National Portrait Gallery.
Portrait of Benjamin ('Ben') Jonson after Abraham van Blyenberch (probably early 19th century, based on a work of c.1617). Held by the National Portrait Gallery.
Photograph of “An Act for Poisoning” 1531 taken by me during my visit to the National Archives exhibition.
Portrait of a Young Woman, thought to be Katherine Howard, from the workshop of Hans Holbein the Younger (c.1540-45). Held by the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.
Portrait of Edward VI from the circle of William Scrots (c.1550). Held in an unknown private collection.
Portrait of Queen Elizabeth I by an unknown English artist (c.1600). Held by the National Portrait Gallery.
Portrait of King James I & VI by Paul van Somer I (c.1620). Held by the Royal Collection.
“The execution of King Charles I” after an unknown artist (c.1649). Held by the National Portrait Gallery.
Screenshot of lordslibrary.parliament.uk/tr...
Quoted texts:
Statute made at Westminster in the parliament holden in the Feast of Saint Hilary in the twenty fifth year of the reign of King Edward the Third” - The Treason Act 1351. Plus other relevant statutes, which are available in translation at: www.google.co.uk/books/editio...
Also consulted, were:
Other relevant entries from The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Online.
“The statutes at large, of England and of Great Britain: from Magna Carta to the union of the kingdoms of Great Britain and Ireland” from archive.org/details/statutesa...
#Treason #History #Law

Пікірлер: 374

@nyckolaus Жыл бұрын

You're mistaken; I could listen to you for hours as you detail every incremental shift in the statute concerning treason over these seven intervening centuries. I could just listen to you for hours.🗡

@ReadingthePast Жыл бұрын

You are most kind ☺️

@kimberlyperrotis8962 Жыл бұрын

Me, too, I’ll be thrilled to listen to anything you might tell us for as long as you want! You’re so erudite about my favorite topic, history, and always a pleasure to listen to. I wish my fellow Americans were even 1/4 as articulate as you are. With all the conspiracy theory, crazy, stuff on SM these days, I love listening to you and a few others who know what they’re talking about, and say it so very well. I just spent an hour enduring a doctor who felt he had to explain what recurrent, cornea and erosion, among other basic terms mean, duh, give me some credit for understanding my native language, at least, I’m not 4 years old. Sadly, he probably does have to explain everything for the functionally illiterate society that comprises most of the US population today.

@baylorsailor Жыл бұрын

@@kimberlyperrotis8962 you sound like a real sweetheart. - Your Fellow American 🇺🇸🗽

@tasanijanus7092 Жыл бұрын

I second that

@mikalbell8125 Жыл бұрын

I particularly enjoyed the part of the video about Petit or Petty treason. The idea that there was a special law for an inferior killing a superior seems strange to us, but makes perfect sense given the belief in a Devinely ordered hierarchy at the time.

@AthenaisC Жыл бұрын

Great video, Dr. Kat. Did you know that in the US, treason is the only crime completely spelled out? Our founding fathers did this so no one could just make up reasons to call something treason. I love hearing your perspective. ❤

@jenniferh671 Жыл бұрын

As a follow up to last week’s video about Anne Boleyn, a video about the men who were accused of and executed for treason for “knowing” Anne would be interesting. We hear so much about Anne, some about her brother, but not much at all about Smeaton, Norris, Weston, or Brereton. Thank you!

@deannabryce8194 Жыл бұрын

✋ 22:05 have heard the term ‘read the riot act’ but never knew the origin. Love your channel.

@johnguglielmini6658 Жыл бұрын

how about a video on Old English slang terms that are not used anymore

@ReadingthePast Жыл бұрын

Oh, this is very interesting! I’ll see what I can find on this!

@prettypic444 Жыл бұрын

I think it's interesting how "treason" was originally a crime against the social order instead of crime against the government like it is now. I'd love to see more videos on early modern laws and courts!

@vickihewlett6121 Жыл бұрын

Would be most interested to have clarity on the difference between treason and rebellion. As usual time well spent in your tutorial. Thank you

@julzy3 Жыл бұрын

I knew of the benefit of clergy loophole, but I didn't know that it was called the neck verse. 😂I think Henry Tudor's choice to change the date of the Battle of Bosworth Field to the day before, letting him retrospectively declare as traitors the enemy combatants, was impressively Machiavellian. Thanks for an excellent presentation as always!🪓

@baylorsailor Жыл бұрын

I wonder how common it was for a person to be declared innocent after going to trial in Tudor times 🤔... I feel it would be rare.

@spews1973 Жыл бұрын

More videos on anything to do with Edward VI will always be welcome. And I'm looking forward to the one on scaffold speeches. I suppose the soon-to-be-executed said nice things about the monarch because otherwise they really could be making things worse for themselves, or at least their families.

@natalee7726 Жыл бұрын

I have a suggestion - how about a video on Jane Seymour focusing on her rise to becoming Queen. That would be fascinating

@kelleysharp3989 Жыл бұрын

At first I wasn't sure about this topic. But the shifting nature of it was fascinating. Especially the part about a wife killing her husband being a form of petit treason. I wonder when the definition shifted to murder? Perhaps when women's suffrage came about? Or was it something that just happened naturally without being explicitly written. Well done as always! I'll give a 👑, since treason was 'usually' against the monarch.

@dawnmuse6481 Жыл бұрын

As soon as you mentioned Edward III’s reign as the inception of codifying what treason is, it made sense. As each revision occurred it was obvious that the point was to silence disagreement and to punish those who acted in an objectionable way when no law yet existed. I really hate power without accountability!

@deborahbranham-taylor6682 Жыл бұрын

Seems to be the definition of kingship. Power without accountability.

@user-fq8rs7rz3i Ай бұрын

@@deborahbranham-taylor6682 Not in the UK since Charles the first lost his head.

@ShallowApple22 Жыл бұрын

Scaffold Speeches, Absolutely Fabulous idea ... i for one have a morbid curiosity about such things it plays into all my interests history psychology and crime. so excited ❤

@hadrianryan4179 Жыл бұрын

I would LOVE videos on the two Rebellions you mentioned! This was a great video. I love these histories of the evolution of one specific idea anchored in different historical moments!!

@arcola44 Жыл бұрын

Another excellent video, as always. Had no idea that the Riot Act was originally from the reign of Edward VI👍. Also, discussion of the "Neck Verse" was fascinating. It put into context for me some American Revolution trivia. When John Adams defended the British Soldiers on trial for the Boston Massacre in 1770, he was able to have them acquitted by arguing Benefit of Clergy. They simply 'read' Psalms 51:1. They were branded on their thumbs and sent back to their unit. Awesome. Look forward to every Friday! Thanks.🪓

@gladtobefreeagain7375 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for the Boston Massacre story. Must admit I never understood John Adams's legal argument & most often it's glossed over to make point of his skill & belief in rule of law. In this case a legal loophole for clerics that saved non-clerics as well. Still chafes that Parliament did not have the foresight to insist British colonists were due representation & were not essentially property of the King. Hindsight & all ...

@dilihopa Жыл бұрын

I’ve been a longtime subscriber and want to say how lucky we all are for your informative, thoughtful, and detailed explanation of every subject you present to us. ❤ from 🇨🇦

@user-jq1rj7lq4s Жыл бұрын

In this 400th anniversary year of the "First Folio" could you do a video on another point of law please? I've always been led to believe that it was illegal for women to act in Shakespeare's time but have since realised that everywhere I had that reinforced had the influence of Ben Elton s wondered whether it was a law, a convention or something else entirely.

@kathyjohnson2043 Жыл бұрын

Yes, everyone now says 'illegal ' but apparently, the only reference was when the King (Charles II maybe?) 40 years later said it was ok for women to be on the public stage. Women were professional entertainers in London, and on stage in other countries. It seems to be one of those 'it's not done' kind of things afterall, the theatre company was The King's Men. I hope Dr Kate covers it sometime.

@user-dh7jo8lz6u Жыл бұрын

Thanks for another great video outlining the Justice and Injustice ⚖over the centuries

@keithcampbell9582 Жыл бұрын

I look forward to your posts every week. I am usually able to follow. Today, I was assigned some homewrk. After this weeks presentation, I had to look up "Branding of the thumb" and "Lord Haw-Haw." Fascinating! 🚬😱👻

@kimberlyperrotis8962 Жыл бұрын

The framers of the US Constitution were educated British gentleman, who knew ancient, medieval, and then-modern, history well. They banned Acts of Attainder from our American constitution because they knew how abused this method of conviction was by powerful sovereigns in their past history. Treason is rarely prosecuted here, it has to be a clear, well-evidenced case of betraying one’s country, as in the famous “Johnny Walker Reb” case. (He fought for the Taliban against US military forces). One of the things that amazes me is that in English/British cases of treason “tried” by Attainder, the assets of the accused were seized for the benefit of the king upon arrest, not after due process and conviction. Parliaments under powerful sovereigns were extremely compliant with their sovereign’s wishes, being afraid for their own lives, families and estates. Attainders thus became an all-too-easy way for the king to kill a political enemy, seize all his assets for himself, and destroy the family of the accused, as Henry VIII did to poor Wolsey, Cromwell, Anne and George Boleyn, Thomas More and others. It was that big no-no in law “arbitrary and capricious”, covered by a thin veneer of legal process.

@user-fq8rs7rz3i Ай бұрын

Your country didn’t exist when that was true of Kings. And since Charles the first lost his head it hasn’t been a problem for our nation.

@BriansJerseygarden Жыл бұрын

Dr Kat I could listen to you for hours you truly are a fascinating orator

@cindys2617 Жыл бұрын

I find it perplexing that the original treason law included acts against the monarch's first born son and daughter but apparently not the balance of their offspring. While I understand the significance of the "first born" in medieval society, it seems remiss to exclude the balance of the children, particularly since so often it's not the first born that goes on to rule and/or inherit. You'd think the law would have named all of the children of the King/Queen. Any explanation for this seeming oversight?

@andreaedwards8644 Жыл бұрын

Dr Kat you have no idea how much joy you bring to my life and have done for a long time now. No day is complete for me without listening and learning from you. With much love and appreciation to you from Australia. 😊

@theclassicso8094 Жыл бұрын

An outstanding and fascinating presentation of the history of the treason law. Thank you very much.

@amykortuem5554 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for this explanation. Tyranny and treason seem to be terrifying dance partners. How does a population know what’s treason this week? And regarding last week’s video, how HenryVIII (with his minions) found a way for Anne Boleyn to have committed treason is chilling.

@evelinharmannfan7191 Жыл бұрын

Yes, but but by then (trial of Ann Boleyn) he had already disposed of so many mighty persons and friends, noone dared to oppose him. He had already crushed any resistance for the acceptance of Ann. (Katherine, Wolsley, Thomas Moore, his firstborn daughter Mary, several bishops, the monasteries, the ENTIRE CHURCH; there was nobody left to stopp him.

@Chris-iz1rd Жыл бұрын

Very cool! I did not know some of this. I understood High Treason and the Riot Act, but learned so much more. Thank You.⚔

@BeeKool__113 Жыл бұрын

As always, Dr.Kat fantastic video. Very informative and interesting. I always learn something new each time I visit the channel.

@irishwoman3975 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for an excellent explanation of treason, there is more to it than I supposed.

@danielsantiagourtado3430 Жыл бұрын

Looking forward to this! Love your channel and you so much girl!😊😊❤❤

@ReadingthePast Жыл бұрын

Thank you 😊

@anneshelton3476 Жыл бұрын

Terrific video! Shifting from harming actual people to an institution is an interesting concept. 👺

@nickmiller4814 Жыл бұрын

I second Nyckolaus! And bless you for using the lovely traditional translation of Psalm 51!

@gladtobefreeagain7375 Жыл бұрын

Excellent discussion today. We Americans often do not know the exact origins of inherited English Common law. Please explain both rebellions you mentioned, Katz & something.

@eshim3961 6 ай бұрын

A man who murders his wife is guilty of murder, but a woman who does the same is guilty of treason. Says a lot about society. Great video, as always.

@Theturtleowl Жыл бұрын

When you're a law student and a history buff this video is a perfect combination.

@megremisfamily4music Жыл бұрын

Great content, Dr Kat! I always wonder how English kings like Henry VIII wielded so much power and could execute for treason given the Magna Carta.

@Hfil66 Жыл бұрын

My understanding is that much of the Magna Carta was repealed soon after it was enacted. In any case, Magna Carta or no Magna Carta, England (nor the UK) never had a formal constitution by which the acts of the Crown (or more recently, Acts of Parliament) could be judged, and only very recently have we even had a Supreme Court.

@marykelly1723 Жыл бұрын

@@Hfil66 What guidelines did British gov't follow during the time of Crowmwell being the Protectorate of England?

@Hfil66 Жыл бұрын

@@marykelly1723 after a war the victor makes his own rules. As a comparison, look at the Nürnberg trials that found people guilty of crimes that had not been crimes at the time they were committed in the jurisdiction in which they were committed (while ignoring crimes that had been committed by the victorious nations).

@kimberlyperrotis8962 Жыл бұрын

I would love for you to discuss who in the royal family is required to be a Protestant and a member of The Church of England. The sovereign is, of course, but his/her spouse? I’m sure virtually all of them are, but what if a royal duke, if second in line to the throne, wants to marry a Catholic, Orthodox, Jew, or someone of another faith? Are they then ineligible to accede to the throne? (Not that I’m considering chasing a royal, like Meghan did)! Thanks, Dr. Kat!

@catgladwell5684 Жыл бұрын

What has Meghan to do with it? AFAIK,she and Harry met and fell in love. There was no "chasing a royal" involved.

@susaniacuone5758 Жыл бұрын

Given that this weekend marks the horrific bungled bad death of Margaret Pole ( my putative many times ancestor ) this new video seems particularly apt. Thankyou as always

@margaretgeorge3903 Жыл бұрын

The shifting boundaries are amazing. ☠️🦹🏾‍♂️🤷🏾‍♀️

@cosgroveshepherd191 Жыл бұрын

Really interesting. Never knew the original riot act was so old, I wonder if the changes about treason now is a response to people like Shamina Begum, asking to come back after being involved with a hostile force. Really great video. Thanks

@Hfil66 Жыл бұрын

It is interesting to compare the way the law on Treason had been used in the past and the law on Terrorism is used today.

@rhiannonpoole6019 Жыл бұрын

Another fascinating video, thank you. I was intrigued by the 'Neck Verse': I'd never heard of that. I would love you to tell us more about those rebellions - the more I watch your channel the more I realise I just don't know. It seems to me that Tudor Monarchs especially got laws changed at the drop of a hat, thinking only of their own selves.

@denisehill7769 Жыл бұрын

Great video! I would love a video on Kett's rebellion, being a member of the Kett family 😁

@aimeclance4196 Жыл бұрын

I always look forward to new videos from Dr Kay. Love her!❤

@nmritter Жыл бұрын

I LOVE yr channel so such!! It's my break from the world. I want to take a vacation tour to England with Dr. Kat!! I cannot get enough Dr. Kat!!!

@simplyjulia3740 Жыл бұрын

🏴‍☠️Love the info! Interesting that treason is still an evolving law today.

@sauvignonblanc0 Жыл бұрын

A highly interesting video on a matter of constitutional and legislative import which the British copied throughout the Empire (including Ireland, New Zealand and Australia amongst others). Thank you. 😌

@ReadingthePast Жыл бұрын

Thank you 😊

@sauvignonblanc0 Жыл бұрын

@@ReadingthePast Given this video on treason, it would be interesting to do a video on the Lord Jeffreys who adjudicated on many a treason trial during the reign of James II. 🙂

@elainemaclellan2425 Жыл бұрын

👍

@maryarigho5868 Жыл бұрын

@@sauvignonblanc0 'Hanging Judge Jeffries'. Saw a portrait of him in the National Portrait Gallery, London and was surprised that he looked so young but had a cruel expression.

@deborahbranham-taylor6682 Жыл бұрын

@@sauvignonblanc0 I second this!

@janicegierhart7778 Жыл бұрын

I love listening to you talk about my favorite subject: British history. 😊

@gr8flyerfan Жыл бұрын

🤚 "Read the Riot Act" was a favorite expression of my mother's!

@prettybirdbeenlpeacock6592 Жыл бұрын

Mine, too.

@tessat338 Жыл бұрын

Wasn't the local official required to read out the riot act? Also William Joyce was born in Brooklyn NY in 1906, so technically, he was an American citizen. His family moved back to Ireland when he was a child. He eventually acquired a British passport, which is the excuse that the Crown used to claim that he was a British subject and therefore eligible to be hanged for treason. Joyce became a naturalized German citizen during WW2 and continued to broadcast to Great Britain until he was captured at the end of the war. The US wasn't claiming him and Germany couldn't protect him in 1945 when the British government decided to try him for treason.

@tessat338 Жыл бұрын

When American enlisted personnel were charged with a civilian crime in Great Britain during WW2, the US military could intervene or they could just leave the servicemember to be tried by a civilian criminal court. Before US personnel were deployed to Great Britain, the US government signed an agreement to this effect. Officers had the privilege of being court martialed but the Crown could argue that they should be charged with a civilian crime. Joyce was not a US service member and his mother was a citizen of the United Kingdom. His father had been a naturalized US citizen before Joyce was born.

@karensilvera6694 Жыл бұрын

🧨🎇 still love your modesty but you know how much we all love listening to you and your knowledge!

@janegardener1662 Жыл бұрын

Very interesting, thank you for taking the time to research and explain this.

@georginaturner1237 Жыл бұрын

Treason it seems is basically a definition of the current anxieties of whoever is in charge. Seems precarious really, too emotional.

@jakual339 Жыл бұрын

For me, this video really feels like the perfect level of detail for a more "conceptual" topic. The knitty gritty of how laws and conventions change is interesting too, don't get me wrong! But it's really useful to see this kind of broad overview of how something has changed over time. Love it! < This emoji is conceptually representative of "treason", for reasons which I hope will be obvious.

@okiejammer2736 Жыл бұрын

Saw recently where a KZfaqr with a huge following predicted the demise of the British monarchy within two years. Sure would be treason to Henry VIII...

@LauraLeMond Жыл бұрын

Kett's Rebellion and Prayer Book Rebellion would like a video on those. So interesting! I've been read the Riot Act a bunch of times in my life LOL maybe a video on a few common sayings and where the history of each term comes from?

@Magic_in_York Жыл бұрын

✋ - would love a vlog re Kett's Rebellion. Read the Shardlake book a couple of years ago and it whetted my appetite!

@christinegraham2579 Жыл бұрын

Thank you, Dr. Kat! I so enjoy your videos.

@debgallagher5709 Жыл бұрын

I thoroughly enjoy your channel. Riveting and entertaining. My Thank you!

@deborahbranham-taylor6682 Жыл бұрын

Love your videos! Give us more, on any topic you desire. They are all fascinating, and I doubt that you will bore anyone. You have a loyal following of history fanatics. ❤

@kimberlyperrotis8962 Жыл бұрын

Treason when people sought to “change the laws of the realm”? We call that the rights of free speech and/or assembly!

@karmakat8016 Жыл бұрын

Dr Kat, I have to say you are looking amazing, have a wonderful weekend xx

@caroleharris3450 Жыл бұрын

👋 wonderfully explained Dr Kat

@caroleharris3450 Жыл бұрын

🌳 🌞

@Itsfineweerallfine Жыл бұрын

Love this exploration of treason, and your work in general!

@kayleenfeher4341 Жыл бұрын

My mother used to read me the riot act a lot when I was little.

@vlmellody51 Жыл бұрын

👋 I particularly love Terry Pratchett's rendition of the Riot Act in "Jingo."

@sheilacasper2030 Жыл бұрын

It sounds as tho this treason law was adjusted as each king thought necessary, whether righteously or not. I am thinking that being in the kings court was a dangerous place. A person could be accused, tried or not, and beheaded at will and whether it was a true crime or not.

@lauramason5667 Жыл бұрын

What a fascinating subject. I can hear more and more about this and please do more videos on the subject of treason. What a great channel you have!♥️🎁☺️

@barbdiamond4924 Жыл бұрын

I do so very much enjoy your programming … I too am dyslexic … to the point I can’t retain/ understand anything I read … so please do continue …. And thank you in advance

@leetaylor3468 Жыл бұрын

I love your videos Dr Kat. So informative.

@bridersurris904 Жыл бұрын

🗡 Very interesting to learn that "low treason," as I've always thought of it, was for contravention of the social hierarchy.

@bobbyb8335 Жыл бұрын

🥷🏻⚔️ Very informative as usual! Keep it coming!

@ElliotOracle Жыл бұрын

I love every video you post Dr. Kat! Thank you 😊🙏

@Twisties34 Жыл бұрын

interesting as always Dr Kat.

@BeeKool__113 Жыл бұрын

🤚 Yes, I have heard of the Riot Act

@harrietlovejoy3424 Жыл бұрын

As always, enjoyed your video! Looking forward to scaffold speech video 😊

@kaymead8210 Жыл бұрын

As always, very interesting & thought provoking

@DJ-mr6um Жыл бұрын

Would love to know whst you thought of the recent Execution exhibition at the museum of london! I left having enjoyed it, but feeling like there could've been more

@jacobhanson4391 Жыл бұрын

🖐️ Love this video as much as all the others!!!

@patriciahill6839 Жыл бұрын

As usual ànothé interesting podcast. Keep doing what you do...Great stuff 😍

@amyferebee Жыл бұрын

Both rebellions please.....thank you for your wonderful videos!

@beckycollier-burgess1568 Жыл бұрын

☠️ struggling with treasonous emojis, but as ever, I love the video!

@katytaters1552 Жыл бұрын

Amazing as always Dr. Kat!

@RobinLynnGriffith Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the reminder I double-checked and you were right it was not set for all on the notifications suddenly❤

@BeeKool__113 Жыл бұрын

Sidenote and completely unrelated. Dr.Kat, I really love your makeup. ❤

@QueenIsabella18 Жыл бұрын

Wow, last week's video certainly captured people's attention! 34K views on one video will certainly alert the algorithm to promote future Reading the Past videos.

@user-rg9yz5ou4y 9 ай бұрын

Any discussion of "treason" in British law should not leave out the famous case of Sir Algernon Sydney. Sydney, who was from an old aristocratic familly and a large landowner, was charged with "treaon" after he participated in discussions with other upper-class men about organizing an "armed march" on London aimed at forcing the king and parliament to change the succession to thrown. They did not want Charles II's younger brother James to succeed to the throne because he was a Roman Catholic, and many Englishmen feared the Catholic church at this time. However, they quickly dismissed the possibility of asasinating the king. Then none of them could think of what this proposed armed march could accomplish. So they decided to abandon the plot and dispersed without resolving on any action. Also at this time, a defendant could only be represented in court by an attorney if the judge consented to it. In this case, the judge, a man named Jeffries, refused to allow Sydney to be represented by counsel. In a line that became famous, Sydney pointed out to judge Jeffries that he had no legal training whatsoever, and was not competent to plead his own case in court. He said asomething to the judge that would be become a famous line, "I fear I am on treacherous ground, milord I do not see my way." Sydney's case was an especially tough one because he was accused of "treason." As you know, Dr. Cat, the English law in incredibly confused and difficult to interpret. Sydney did his best to fend himself at his trial, but his defennse was confused and disorganized, and did not make a good impression on the jury. He was convicted and hanged. However many members of parliament, some of whom were personal friends or aquaintances of Sydney, considered this a gross miscarriage of justice, So they included in the Bill of Rights that they adoptedin 1689, a provision that in any criminal case in which the defendant was "in danger of life and limb," "the right to consel shall not be denied." A century later, this provision also found its way into the U.S. Bill of Rights. Dr. Kat, please do a future podcast on the Sydney case. I will be only too happy to share with you my sources on the subject.

@Elvertaw Жыл бұрын

Thank you for another wonderful video❤ The bit about ERI bent consigned to bastardy along with Mary. I was wondering if the is any evidence they actually got along? ✋🏼

@illrawb Жыл бұрын

Dr Kat, all of your content brightens my days! Much love from Canada!

@TJTHEFOOTBALLPROPHET Жыл бұрын

The smartest woman I don't officially know but feel like I do - much love from New Orleans❤

@nicolebrunzel6608 Жыл бұрын

Thank you for another informative video. I love listening to you so much.

@steffaniabercrombierealtor3343 Жыл бұрын

🪢👻 I think we can all agree that some of the offenses that were considered a treason back in the day were ridiculous. Even just talking about the kings death was considered treason, and that I just unbelievable. But I do believe that treason is still a risk in today’s society, regardless of what country you live in and I was kind of surprised to learn that you in the UK do not have the death penalty anymore. I was not aware of that. We still have it here in the United States although it is rarely used.