I was you a few yrs ago. I think you should go to some RCIA classes and see what the Catholic Church is all about. When I did, I found the religion beautiful. At the end, you decide if you want convert. Good luck, God bless.

I will pray for you 💞💞

Praying for you to become RC! 😇🙏🏽

Tell me when Mary was assumed into Heaven who witnessed and recorded the event?

I will pray for you. I hope that you do come home, though! The Church is so beautiful and the Eucharist is the most amazing thing on earth ❤❤❤

It's funny how most of the criticisms evangelical Protestants have of Catholicism equally apply to those other churches you listed, and yet you basically never hear them talking about Eastern Orthodoxy or whatever, it's kinda not on their radar.

@@titanomachy2217 I think it’s because the orthodox are mainly in the east

@@titanomachy2217 They justify it by saying "well, Orthodoxy is just *so* different. Their Eastern way of thinking is really hard to engage with etc" But yes, in reality, every argument they make about Catholics not having the gospel can be easily applied to all Orthodox churches too. Maybe some Anglo-Catholics but not really. They would claim that as long as you have the five solas then that's close enough. Nevermind that they can't even reach an agreement on baptism or the eucharist.

some of those maybe, but Presbyterians and Lutherans don't believe in baptismal regeneration. I am pretty doubtful that Anglicans, Methodists, and Wesleyans do either.

​@@ChristopherNeedham-sx5utLutherans and Anglicans literally teach baptismal regeneration what are you talking about

@@tony1685 Ten commandments. So you are having your Sabbath? IF NOT, YOU HAVE PROBLEMS OF CONSISTANCY. IF YES, YOU DO NOT KNOW THE SCRIPTURES

@@tony1685 you say the same thing every time. But you can only know Christ through the Church He gave us, who gave you the Bible. The apostles were given the power to forgive sins through Christ. The only man made doctrines are those Calvin and Luther invented. Bible cherry picking doesn’t help you when you don’t have history on your side

Wholeheartedly agree with the losing IQ part. I’ve wondered the exact same thing. It also feels like knowles loses his IQ when he talks about libertarianism/the various strawmen arguments he brings up. Both of these situations drive me nuts lol

You deal with Tony as if dealing with a regular Protestant. He seems like a Seventh Day Adventist though, which is a whole different game. All day long it's "whaddabout the Sabbath! You ignore the Bible!" But I never hear any of them own up to Paul saying he doesn't permit women to teach in the church as they follow the main teacher of their faith, Ellen G. White.

That's simply not true. Methodists are closer than catholicism lol and stop baptizing babies, they don't even know what sin is yet...

@YAJUN YUAN Much before that. Don't conflate defining dogma with the creation of it. A majority of dogma was written and believed in long before the 4th Lateran Council.

@@tony1685 i don't remember Jesus describing the Church that way, i remember him describing prayer as such.

@YAJUN YUAN not you talking about dates when Seventh Day Adventist beliefs came around 159 years ago

@@tony1685 One of those commandments is not to establish denominations. Which all Protestant churches by definitions fail to obey.

@@tony1685 A church isn't just 2 people meeting. Jesus clearly sets up an institution, with successors, and those successors chose successors.

Back when I used to live in my mother´s house a Priest at the mass would sometimes say things like "we as Catholics need to know the scriptures and our faith in order not to fall for Protestant missinformation" and then go on to explain some basic concepts like how praying to a Saint does not mean you´re adoring a Saint, you´re just asking for intercession and that if you were actually adoring a Saint then that would be a sin that you would need to confess. But, other than that, he never spent more than 5 to 10 minutes doing so, and even then he was teaching us, he didn´t go on and on bashing the protestants.

Exactly what brought me back to Catholicism. They were the only ones praying for all Christians to come into unity, praying for all non believers to finally believe and more. I realised Catholics were the only ones not going around hating on other Christian’s but instead being forced to defend themselves. Coca Cola doesn’t need to defend itself to Pepsi - yet Pepsi constantly used to market itself against Coca Cola.

Very true. Prots talks ill about catholics whenever they get the opportunity. They feel entitled to bash catholics coz they think God would be impressed.

@@manny75586 How many Protestant services have you attended? I have never once heard any minister addressing Catholicism in a service. That is never part of worship.

@@YY-jv4uu Ignorance. Catholicism has always labeled non-Catholics as heretics and claimed they were the only true church. I would call Inquisitions, torture, killing as hate. It's Protestants, the truly faithful, who have always been persecuted by Catholicism. You are contradicting yourself with the Coca Cola example...lol. Protestants are the main ones who evangelize, who try to reach the lost and deceived, so you lie.

Indeed, faith without works is dead.

@YAJUN YUAN Please explain exactly how Catholic works are "different".

@YAJUN YUAN Does the Church teach you must do a certain amount of these Catholic works to be saved? I know the Church requires the faithful to partake of the Eucharist once a year within the Paschal season in good faith; but I don't think they teach you'll be damned if you don't consume.

@YAJUN YUAN wao! Are you a catholic? For catholics..worjs are acts of charity. Anything that we do out of love for God and neighbour is a good work. And let me remind you of what will happen on Judgement day. God will separate the sheep from the goat on the basis of their good works and not on their belief in sola scriptura: when I was hungry you gave me to eat, when I was thirsty you gave me to drink, when I was nacked you clothed me, when I was in prison you visited me.

@YAJUN YUAN No they are not.

why is it that Catholics get possessed?

All religions have exorcists..the Hindus Muslims Buddhists have exorcists.. what's your point??

If he loved our church, you'd think it would be easier to be Catholic. The world would treat us nicer, and our way would be wide and cushy.

@@FirstLast-po8oz exactly

satan hates Holy Eucharist and Rosary

The Bible

@@fireflames3639 Duh, the Catholic church literally compiled and canonized the New Testament aka made the New Testament and added the 27 books in the Bible. You should be thankful to the Catholic Church and do some research.

@@MAP2023 You are a silly guy

@@fireflames3639 he's right though. Also, the first pope Peter was appointed by Jesus himself. All the Catholic priest until today have an unbroken line of who appounted them going back to the bishops and to the popes that appointed them going back to Peter and Going back to when Jesua appointed him. Jesus will not make a mistake by Establishing the wrong church for the 1st 1500 yrs before Martin Luther would come. Alot of the biblical evidence can be found out more here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Y85pZ71e2KuVZWQ.html

@@gluteusMAXlMUS Peter wasn't the first Pope. And the Rock Jesus was talking about was Himself! Peter wasn't even mentioned once in Paul's letter to Rome! Do you really think protestants believe that it took till the 1500s to discover the gospel? The Roman Catholic Church wasn't even founded in the same we know it today until the 4th laternan council in the 1200s. People like Tertullian, Augustine, Irenaeus, Justin Martyr, Jerome, and many others were not papist. Jerome even had a note in his translation that the apocrypha wasn't scripture! The immaculate conception was denied by Augustine (though he did believe she was sinless, he believed she had original sin). Bodily assumption of Mary was unheard of for a thousand years after Christ. And the biggest argument of mine against the Roman Church is her belief that works in some way merit justification when the Bible is clear it is by faith apart from works. Ephesians 2:8-10 - "For by grace ye are saved through faith, and that not of yourselves it is the gift of God, not of works lest any man should boast: For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works which he hath before ordained that we should walk in them."

There's a quack Protestant "exorcist" who actually went to Italy and visited /spoke with (studied?) with Italian Catholic exorcists. He now performs "exorcisms" (100s a day) where he charges 100s of dollars per exorcism and talks crap about the Catholic Church and how evil and wrong she is. He even dresses up as a Catholic priest and uses "holy water" but says demons aren't scared of Catholics and the Catholic Church. Dude is such a liar and makes no sense but people up all his lies.

That’s what I wonder too about how is it possible for Protestants to cast out demons. However I did read that Father Vincent Lampert, an exorcist, did say that Catholics don’t have a monopoly on the Holy Spirit so that it is possible for Protestants to cast out demons.

The Catholic Church, mother of all harlots… Until you are demon possessed and need an exorcism. Protestants are funny and sad.

@@tony1685 What the hell???!! Dude, just stop.

@@tony1685 🙄

God bless you my friend for saying so, as a Catholic Christian I definitely appreciate it thank you

It comes mostly from the more Calvinist Protestants. Lutherans and Anglicans don’t tend to be so anti-Catholic.

@@gch8810 if they aren’t anti Catholic, why aren’t they Catholic??? It comes from all corners cause that’s the very bases of Protestantism I will admit that there are Protestants that do act like our brothers and sisters in Christ

I find anti Protestant more from Catholics though than the other way around

Gavin Ortlund is by far the most interesting, fair, and well rounded critic of Catholicism. James White types rely on assertions and givens with no proofs. When you point out that Calvin, Luther, & Zwingli accept many of the doctrines he's rallying against they accuse the reformers of being too Catholic and only accepting Catholic (Marian, Canon etc) doctrines because of the "Catholic soil" they were planted in. Newsflash James White - YOU are planted in Catholic soil, just a lot further from the garden. Your future protestant critics will one day accuse YOU of being too Catholic for the few things left that you cling to which are sound doctrine coming from the Church. Every generation of self assured autonomous protestant authoritarians finds themselves a little further from the deposit of faith. This archetype is not new. Protestants are the new Samaritans - though they have goodwill among them, they worship what they do not understand.

Unfortunate many Catholics do the same. Many times I’ll hear Catholics say, “oh no I’m not Christian, I’m catholic.” Don’t get me wrong, I used to do the same thing growing up but now I know better.

@@tony1685 Subjective opinions aren't basic and obvious.

@@49erfanaticfromnm30 please don’t get into it with tony. Hi tony. You’ll just end up with a headache. Hi tony.

@YAJUN YUAN Anyone who holds to the tenets established by Christ and affirmed by his Church. And not to man-made additions introduced by the likes of Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Ulrich Zwingli, et al.

@@tony1685 Maybe you have mistaken them. 🤔

You were _never_ Christians, not to this day. You are ANTI-Christians, you worship the Antichrist (in the place of Christ) instead of Jesus Christ. You are not saved Christians, you are lost pagans, worshipping the devil, and too blind to see it. Blasphemous titles claimed for the pope have been embellished and enlarged over the centuries. But a few of these boastful claims appear in an ecclesiastical (Roman Catholic) dictionary, by Lucius Ferraris, entitled _Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica,_ Vol. VI, pgs. 438, 442, article "Pope." _The Catholic Encyclopedia,_ 1913 edition, Vol. VI, p. 48, speaks of this book as "a veritable encyclopedia of religious knowledge," and "a precious mine of information." "The pope is of so great dignity and so exalted that he is not a mere man, but as it were God, and the vicar of God." "The pope is of such lofty and supreme dignity that, properly speaking, he has not been established in any rank of dignity, but rather has been placed upon the very summit of all ranks of dignities. . . ." "He is likewise the divine monarch and supreme emperor and king of kings." "Hence the pope is crowned with a triple crown, as king of heaven and of earth and of the lower regions." "So that if it were possible that the angels might err in the faith, or might think contrary to the faith, they could be judged and excommunicated by the pope." "The pope is as it were God on earth, sole sovereign of the faithful of Christ, chief king of kings, having plenitude of power, to whom has been entrusted by the omnipotent God direction not only of the earthly but also of the heavenly kingdom." "The pope can modify divine law, since his power is not of man but of God." The above quotes are from _What's Behind The New World Order?_ Go to CatholicNewWorldOrder.com and click on the top link. ---------- "I am all in all and *above all,* so that God, Himself and I, the Vicar of God, have but one consistory, and I am able to do ALMOST ALL THAT GOD CAN DO . . . What therefore, can you make of me but God?" -Pope Nicholas, quoted in _Antichrist_ by Ian Paisley, pg. 54. The pope calls himself God, i.e., "Lord God the pope," "another God on earth." "We hold upon this earth the place of God Almighty," Pope Leo XIII said in an _Encyclical Letter,_ June 20, 1894. "The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, but he is Jesus Christ Himself, hidden under veil of flesh," the _Catholic National_ said in July 1895. And every priest is an "Alter Christus," Another Christ. So every priest is Jesus. Plus, during the Mass the priest transubstantiates the bread into the literal, "real presence" of Christ. In other words, man creates God. "He is the creator of his Creator." _-The Dignity and Duties of the Priest_ by Liguori, Ch. 1, Part IV. How is any of this _not_ blasphemy?! Christianity teaches that the pope is the Antichrist. The proud pontiff's official title is Vicar of Christ, meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ translated into Greek is Antichristos, in English Antichrist, also meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ and Antichrist are the exact same word in two different languages. Vicar of Christ in Latin is Vicarius Filii Dei, meaning Vicar of the Son of God, or Vicar of Christ. VICARIVS FILII DEI. Add up the 11 Roman numerals and you get 666. Rev. 13:18. angelfire.com/on/3angels Revelation 13. 1 I . . . saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns . . . and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. 2 And _the _*_dragon (Satan)_*_ gave him (the beast) his power, and his seat,_ and great authority. 4 And _they worshipped the _*_dragon_*_ which gave power unto the beast:_ and they worshipped the beast . . . 5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies . . . 6 And he opened his mouth in *blasphemy against God,* to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, *_Come out of her,_** my people,* that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities." Rev. 18:4, 5.

@@floogelhornzzz4770 You're insane. ...by the way.

🤣😂😅

That's not true. The Romam Catholic Church was founded in 325 a.d.

@@AKdaJuiceGuy Considering your offshoot was definitely founded hundreds of years later, it would still be true; but you are partially Correct. There are many rites of Catholicism. Roman rite was founded well after the eastern rite. The church at Antioch is still there. Paul and Barnabas founded it.

Paraphrasing Pope John XXIII "Christian is my first name, Catholic is my family name".

Excellent, A melancholy bear

@@DavidRodriguez-cm2qg Dude, lay off the shrooms!

Agree. We need to reclaim the name!

How To Be Christian has been doing this too, making distinctions between Christian and Protestant beliefs.

It's also unfortunate in the states. Many many claim Christian because it's the cultural thing to do but don't even attempt to live a Christ like life.

Protestantism leads to atheism. Every Protestant country is now atheist majority. Protestants target Catholics because they’re easier to convert

>>They say what I believe when I've never heard of those things in my life

@@kimfleury John Macarthur's net worth is in the millions as is James White. There's nothing inherently wrong with wealth but using it as an argument against the Catholic Church while also possesing a great deal of money is hypocritical to say the least.

There is so much hate in them towards Catholics, my country had so much conflict over it.

My thoughts exactly. I can't wrap my head around it.

They’re just jealous

White and Durbin's arguments for Christianity are terrible! They just beg the question using pre-sup (the same view Trent debated Jay Dyer about).

I used to be in that camp. Most are totally sold out to Christ and are saved and are defending the atoning work of Jesus on the cross. But they don’t know what the Catholic Church teaches on justification and salvation. Most Catholics don’t know either. We need to get into Gods word more, and our Catechism.

James white, Mike winger and John MacArthur are the ones that lose their minds the most when it comes to Catholicism. You can see 1) their disdain and probably hatred for it and 2) their ignorance of it.

Excellent quip!

Says who? More often than not it's the Protestants that I see evangelizing out on the streets. It is because Protestants is why I know so much of the bible

This is true, I agree... Protestantism is not a threat to Satan, I am a deliverance minister in our church, demons will said they have no authority, since the enemy is legalistic

@@jemarpaloso6272 you spoken to demons?

@@darkheart9668 no I won't and never speak to them, but prior to deliverance, one of our case, because the patient is not catholic, the pastor will lay their hand on the patient, the patient scream and said "you have no authority over us" ... Because the mother is RC, the last resort is they went to our team for deliverance... The manifestation is real, demon is real.. so as the power of saints, mother Mary, and the archangel Michael

So your perfectly OK with the Marian Dogmas as a former Protestant? Based off of your thorough study of scripture you came to the conclusion that Rome had it right all the time?

Welcome back!😊

@@gideondavid30 Jesus founded the Catholic Church..therefore yes it's always right in its teachings. Even if YOU disagree.

@@R.C.A.T That is an alleged claim. How do you know that with 100 percent certainty? Whether I agree or disagree iss irrelevant what is your evidence for it? God gave you a brain. You can reason.

@@gideondavid30 Are you a Christian?

A friend of mine came into full communion with the Catholic Church. Her amazing story can be found here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/layHrdChlsXPpYU.html You might consider making contact with the Coming Home Network. It was founded by a former Presbyterian Minister. The primary purpose of the organization is to assist Protestant Clergy on their journey into full communion with the Catholic Church.

Go for it. Time is getting short. Not to rush, take your time to assess and meditate truth, but do look at how things are turning...

Gotta question "Dr" Whites education. How could someone with a doctorate be so ignorant.

You researched Church history? Do you even know where the word Church came from Pagan? "CHURCH" can only be found in Wycliff's translation when speaking of a pagan temple. CIRCE was a Greek female deity pronounced Kirke' Scottish it is Kirk, In German it is Kirche Netherlands it is Kerk for the word church. Anglo-Saxon root Circe, daughter of Helios, the Sun-deity; Tyndale used the word "CHURCHES" in his translation only in one place in Acts where it spoke of pagan temples. Ekklesia = Greek for assembly or congregation. The proper terminology to be used is "assembly" or "assemblies". SUN DEITY NAMES USED WITHIN CHRISTIANITY AND MOST PUT IN THE SCRIPTURES WHICH PROVES THAT CHRISTIANITY IS OF SATAN: JESUS, CHRIST, ANGEL, AMEN, ADONAI, LORD, GOD, BIBLE, SACRED HADES, HELL - DEITIES OF THE UNDERWORLD AND SUN DEITIES TOO. So you studied Christian history yet you do not know that it is pagan to the core and you studied? You poor brainwashed people.

@@garystanfield2274 as someone who was once atheist, and believed all this internet trope, I'm begging you to read some legitimate research.

God bless you Sam ✝️🙂

Thank you brother

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q5ZiprF5t7Swc58.html

We love them because they make you look so bad😁

@@jbchoc I’m glad you love caricatures of the truth. That seems like a healthy way to live out the Christian Faith.

I heard a funny story once from a Canadian Catholic. She and a group from her church went to protest a new Satanic church in her town. They started to pray the rosary right in front. The next day a group of protestants came to protest them for saying the rosary. Just goes to show how messed up some of these churches are. I have never heard of a great calamity or punishment from God for saying rosaries.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q52BbKmEvdfZgZs.html

The "church" of the "Sacred Inquisition" is not.

​@floogelhornzzz4770 huh?

Jesus hates Calvinism and Catholicism.

His preaching no doubt aided in the conversion of his sister to the Catholic church

@@ironymatt that’s interesting, I didn’t know that

@@jambangoni her name is Patty Bonds and she's White's elder sister. There's of course more to her story than her brother - people come to the Catholic church for Jesus - but his anti-Catholic hostilities were a not-inconsiderable factor, especially as his outlook appears to have worsened post conversion.

@@jambangoni Look up Patty Bonds interview on KZfaq.

If that is true then you are not listening to him.

@YAJUN YUAN It is interesting to hear this from you because Mr. Horn is dealing with Calvinists. Some of them believe that SDAs are heretics and I know some internet Calvinists who believe that believing in annihilationism is heresy.

@YAJUN YUAN agree, the guy's special

Oh? You never get tired of Trent's rebuttals, huh? WELL HOW ABOUT THIS REBUTTAL OF CATHOLICISM? Mr. Horn is wasting his LIFE trying to promote a non-prophet organization, and here's why. Specifically, the catechism quotes the Council of Trent (which claimed to be guided by the Holy Spirit TWICE in their decree on the Eucharist) and states that the Catholic religion may be SUMMARIZED in one sentence --which, as will be shown, just happens to be a lie. I've mentioned this on other of his videos, but of course, he is speechless. So buckle your seat belts. Notice the words in caps... “Christ our Redeemer SAID that it was TRULY his body he was OFFERING [in sacrifice at the Last SUpper] ...." (CCC 1376). Aside from the fact it is point blank, flatly unbiblical to assert that Christ "offered himself in sacrifice at the Last Supper BEFORRRRRE he went to the cross" (CCC 621), the worse error is to misquote Jesus Christ who DID NOT SAY that the bread was "TRUUUUUUULY" his body. He said, "This is my body", period, not that the bread was "TRUUUULY" his body. Obviously, the magisterium felt the biblical account was inadequate to stand on its own, and so in reaction to the Reformers, they stuck a word in Christ's mouth to force their position down the gullible laity's throats pretending the Holy Spirit was guiding them. NONSENSE. Now the fact is, the words, "This is" are shown to be metaphorical by at least 50 examples throughout the biblical record, whereas papal pundits simply ASSERT, without a scrap of evidence, that Jesus was speaking literally! If they want to risk their souls on that (since those VERY WORDS they MISQUOTE Jesus as saying actually SUMMARIZE their whole life's existence!), then so be it. We have warned them. As a result of their being guilty of adding to the word of God, all claims for infallibility come tumbling down, not to mention anything they say about the Eucharist is to be rejected as well. Now the fact is, it is up to the Christian to decipher the Lord's meaning FROM THE TEXT, and not from the circus of Catholic apologetic clowns who came after it. Hence, based on the fact Jesus is gravely concerned about the sanctity of his word down to the last “jot and tittle” (Matt 5:18), that one, single gross addition to the word of God (namely, "TRULY") is like a flashing neon sign that ANY non-catholic explanation regarding the words "This is"... should be preferred over and against what the Pope has to say. Therefore, Transubstantiation is unsubstantiated and unsustainable due to the council claiming to be infallible, but in fact, have been found to be liars (Rev 2:2; cf: Deut 18:22, Jer 23:30-40, Ezekiel 13:1-7). It is promised in those passages that all who recklessly wag their tongues by asserting, “The Lord says”, (when the Lord did not say), will be swiftly cast out of his presence (cf. Jeremiah 14:14, 23:16-21). Since CCC 1376 is biblically bankrupt, yet decreed by a supposedly “infallible” council (CCC 888-892) the case for Transubstantiation and Infallibility falls flat and Catholicism is instantly exposed as a “non-prophet” organization (Eph 5:11). Care to respond? No, I didn't think so.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q52BbKmEvdfZgZs.html

Yeah, it's a shame that there are other sects of Christians out there who don't just blindly accept the claims of Rome on faith without any analysis. We just believe what ever we are told. No scrutiny, no cross examination .... nothing. That's a sure way of coming to the truth on any subject.

@@gideondavid30 blind faith? i doubt you even watched the video. how on earth does lying and making false claims about another sect equate in any way to making an "analysis"?

@@brandont.6510 What does my comment have to do with James White's critique? What I am saying is the mere cross examination of another sect is seen as wrong. I disagree. Rome must be challenged on its claims of authority. Period. Whether you feel James White straw manned Catholicism or not is besides my point. Simply believing an institution is infallible without knowing why and without sufficient evidence is dangerous and is cult like. That goes for Roman Catholics but for any political or religious group. A person should know full well why he believes we believes and not leave it up to the "smarter or holier than thou" people to it for them.

@@gideondavid30 If that's what you meant why did you feel the need to reply to my comment which had absolutely nothing to do with that? I was talking about protestant propaganda which lies about the Catholic Church. I do agree however, along with pretty much everyone else in this comment section, that authority and beliefs should not go unquestioned. Nowhere in the video does Trent say anything against cross-examination, he's actually a proponent of it- so I'm not sure what is inspiring you to bring this up.

@@brandont.6510 That isn't true. Roman Catholics believe in a very dangerous doctrine of papal authority which binds the limit by which you can challenge anything.

True

accusing others of what one is doing themselves is a pattern similar to what Judas does as described in John 12:5-6: Why wasn’t this perfume sold and the money given to the poor? It was worth a year’s wages.[b]” 6 He did not say this because he cared about the poor but because he was a thief; as keeper of the money bag, he used to help himself to what was put into it.

I wouldn't say he loves it. He cannot love. And obviously even a wrong faith in Jesus still is a faith. Nobody is perfect. What He "loves" about Calvinism and other schismatics and heretics, is their hate towards Catholic Church, which is the fruit of their pride. Of course that doesn't apply to most people, because most people don't have the knowledge to make the correct informed decision to reject the Truth. But I'm afraid people like White do have that knowledge, just like the Pharisees did, yet refused to accept the only logical outcome.

Satan doesn’t love anything or anyone.

​@@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc himself

@YAJUN YUAN By definition, the fathers of these later denomination would be heretical because the founders of the sect altered established religious doctrine of Christianity.

There was Christianity before Catholicism. Catholicism is one of those splinters (it's heresy).

@@endtimesareuponus8930 Read Ignatius of Antioch, who died 110 A.D. and was a contemporary of St. John the evangelist. He basicly confirms most Catholic claims, like the importance of sacraments, the role of bishops and the universal bounds of the Roman church. He is anything but protestant.

@@illyrian9976 hahahahaha.

@@endtimesareuponus8930 Nice rebut, totally "got em" there.

The devil hates that we still perform Mass in Latin and ask St. Michael the Archangel every Mass to defend us in battle. Catholics are the only ones meeting the forces of darkness head on and not giving up ground "just to get along".

@@tony1685 - I suppose you actually believe the hate that James White and others are spewing. I know the difference between faith in God and wholeness of faith with the Catholic Church. I feel sorry for people like you that feed on hate of the Church.

@@tony1685 Tony, Iconoclasm was settled in the 8th century. The heaviest Eastern critics ended up being the foremost makers and lovers of Icons. When you don't know history you're doomed to repeat someone else's errors. What better way to use the gift of artistry than to make art and sculpture praising God. Square John 14:15 with the bronze serpent, the angels on the arc of the covenant, or the bulls, pomegranates, or palm trees in the Temple. The commandment forbids "Worship" of icons as Gods (as does Catholic doctrine), but not veneration of holy objects. This is easily illustrated by both biblical texts and Christian history. Earliest depiction of Mary is in the catacombs, year 150ish. Earliest depiction of Angels is on top of the arc of the covenant. Or 250 for angels depicted by Christians. The early Church was and is Catholic.

@@tony1685 - you keep saying “the Bible proves it” yet you offer no proof. You do realize that we would not have the 73 books of the Bible (Protestants are the ones who took books away, not Catholics adding to the canon) were it not for the fourth century councils formed by the Church. So were these early Christians so stupid that they added things to the canon of scripture that actually disproves the Catholic Church is the one, true, apostolic Church? I think not. You clearly do not deal in logic.

@@tony1685 Yikes, So much error to respond to. This is what happens when you follow a false prophet like Ellen G White. 1. I don't ignore the dark ages, or any other dark spot in Church history. Just like I dont ignore both Solomon and David (killing a man to have someones wife?, Bringing idols into the city?) We are fallen. Re-read the book of Kings / Judges. These were Gods annointed ones and more often than not, they failed. 2. The Bronze serpent was not in the sanctuary. It was outside. People were ordered to gaze upon a statue to be healed. A statue of a snake no less. Or how about people being healed by Peters hankerchief? How about images of Mary in the catacombs where the earliest Christians worshipped? How about the priests being ritually cleansed in a bowl supported by Oxen. You need more context. The commandment not to worship idols is prohibits just that. WORSHIP. This is illustrated clearly in the story of the bronze serpent. It was right and just for God to work through miracles through a statue, but the moment the people started to WORSHIP it in place of God, he ordered it destroyed. 3. Yes it is ok to murder. It's called Just War. The Catechism has a section on it. God is the same today and forever. If HE deems war ok in some circumstances then who am I to argue. 4. Yes I can show you where the 1st day was made holy. It's called the resurrection. Christ is Lord over the Sabbath. The early church recognized this. Roman spy accounts tell about the Eucharist being celebrated on the "day of the sun" as early as the 100's. The old Sabbath has passed away, though the Catholic Church still keeps a Saturday evening Vigil mass (near sundown) available as an option for worship. 5. Pray means petition. It means to converse with but more specifically to ask. Christ himself conversed with Moses and Elijah in front of 2 apostles. They spoke of his journey to Jerusalem. Christ also said, everything I have done, you will do and more. 6. I can show you where Christ forgave sins as a model to the apostles. "Go your sins are forgiven" I can show in the book of James where it says Confess your sins to one another. I can show where Christ says to Peter what you retain on earth is retained in heaven and what you loose on earth is loosed in heaven. Confession is a gift. Christ appointed placeholders in the form of priests to carry on his earthly ministry. Part of that ministry was the forgiveness of sins. Run away from that apostate heretic Church, Seventh Day Adventists. Run far away!

Well, how can you be Christian by worshipping the Antichrist (in the place of Christ) instead of Jesus Christ? Wouldn't that make you an ANTI-Christian, a Satan-worshipping, hellbound pagan? 🔥 Blasphemous titles claimed for the pope have been embellished and enlarged over the centuries. But a few of these boastful claims appear in an ecclesiastical (Roman Catholic) dictionary, by Lucius Ferraris, entitled _Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica,_ Vol. VI, pgs. 438, 442, article "Pope." _The Catholic Encyclopedia,_ 1913 edition, Vol. VI, p. 48, speaks of this book as "a veritable encyclopedia of religious knowledge," and "a precious mine of information." "The pope is of so great dignity and so exalted that he is not a mere man, but as it were God, and the vicar of God." "The pope is of such lofty and supreme dignity that, properly speaking, he has not been established in any rank of dignity, but rather has been placed upon the very summit of all ranks of dignities. . . ." "He is likewise the divine monarch and supreme emperor and king of kings." "Hence the pope is crowned with a triple crown, as king of heaven and of earth and of the lower regions." "So that if it were possible that the angels might err in the faith, or might think contrary to the faith, they could be judged and excommunicated by the pope." "The pope is as it were God on earth, sole sovereign of the faithful of Christ, chief king of kings, having plenitude of power, to whom has been entrusted by the omnipotent God direction not only of the earthly but also of the heavenly kingdom." "The pope can modify divine law, since his power is not of man but of God." The above quotes are from _What's Behind The New World Order?_ Go to CatholicNewWorldOrder.com and click on the top link. ---------- "I am all in all and *above all,* so that God, Himself and I, the Vicar of God, have but one consistory, and I am able to do ALMOST ALL THAT GOD CAN DO . . . What therefore, can you make of me but God?" -Pope Nicholas, quoted in _Antichrist_ by Ian Paisley, pg. 54. The pope calls himself God, i.e., "Lord God the pope," "another God on earth." "We hold upon this earth the place of God Almighty," Pope Leo XIII said in an _Encyclical Letter,_ June 20, 1894. "The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, but he is Jesus Christ Himself, hidden under veil of flesh," the _Catholic National_ said in July 1895. And every priest is an "Alter Christus," Another Christ. So every priest is Jesus. Plus, during the Mass the priest transubstantiates the bread into the literal, "real presence" of Christ. In other words, man creates God. "He is the creator of his Creator." _-The Dignity and Duties of the Priest_ by Liguori, Ch. 1, Part IV. How is any of this _not_ blasphemy?! Christianity teaches that the pope is the Antichrist. The proud pontiff's official title is Vicar of Christ, meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ translated into Greek is Antichristos, in English Antichrist, also meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ and Antichrist are the exact same word in two different languages. Vicar of Christ in Latin is Vicarius Filii Dei, meaning Vicar of the Son of God, or Vicar of Christ. VICARIVS FILII DEI. Add up the 11 Roman numerals and you get 666. Rev. 13:18. angelfire.com/on/3angels Revelation 13. 1 I . . . saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns . . . and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. 2 And _the _*_dragon (Satan)_*_ gave him (the beast) his power, and his seat,_ and great authority. 4 And _they worshipped the _*_dragon_*_ which gave power unto the beast:_ and they worshipped the beast . . . 5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies . . . 6 And he opened his mouth in *blasphemy against God,* to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, *_Come out of her,_** my people,* that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities." Rev. 18:4, 5.

@@floogelhornzzz4770 My dude. A literal 5-second adventure through Google Translate is enough to demonstrate "vicar" is not "anti-christ" in Greek or any other language. You can't just copy-paste illiterate arguments and expect not to be checked. You clearly don't know what the word "vicar" means, what is meant by "alter christus", you demonstrate no knowledge of what the word "Pope" is, your interpretation of Revelation is so funny as to be impossible to take seriously, and all of this can be said without even trying to offer explanations of Luke 10:16 or Acts 9:4 or Ephesians 5:30. For one who thinks of himself as a Christian, your lack of familiarity with basic concepts is concerning.

Some Catholics are saved from hell. Many aren't. Bible is clear on who is saved from hell.

@@endtimesareuponus8930 care to elaborate? And why do you think it’s a “Catholic” thing instead of a “Christian” thing or a “human” thing? “Saved from Hell” isn’t a phrase that actually appears in the Bible, unless you’ve got a strange translation, so you need to do more work to demonstrate the “clarity”

@@ArchetypeGotoh no. I don't care to waste my time with a very stubborn soul.

The Great Schism occurred in 1054 AD. Don't forget the Orthodox church and the Old Testament by the Jews also existed and help "put it together" before the Great Schism. Canonization of the bible occurred before the Schism.

@@floravarghese416 There was only one Church before the schism. The Eastern Schismatic sect only came into existence when they broke away from the Catholic Church, prior to that they were part of the Church but once they left they became something new and different.

@@floravarghese416 The Old Testament Jews actually did not put the Bible Canon together. By the time of Jesus there were multiple sects within Judaism such as the Pharisees, etc. And the Jews did not have an outlined Canon, they had a rough idea of what might be Scripture, but they didn’t know for sure, by the time of Jesus. Just read from the historian Josephus, even though he’s not exactly one hundred percent credible. After Jesus, the Jews didn’t have a set Canon for a long time, and the Christian Church had already been growing and spreading by the time they finally set a Jewish canon. The early Christians did not keep a set Canon, they did not decide to create a set Canon, so there were multiple ideas within the Christian community about what was Canon, and Christians went without a set Canon for a while, and there were again different ideas about the Canon, the early Christian Writings outnumbered the New Testament Books, and there was debate over the Old Testament Canon, since the Jews didn’t have a set Canon by the time of Jesus. The Christians disagreed on what was Canon until the Catholic Church stepped in and decided. There were schisms from the Catholic Church, but you must remember, before they decided to schism, it was all one Church.

@@lukebrasting5108 Don't tell that to them though. To them, we're not merely schismatics that broke off *from them*. We're full blown heretics.

@@lukebrasting5108 That's an interesting take on it. I'm sure the Orthodox churches- the coptics , Syrian, Greeks, Ethiopian etc disagree with your view as do most historians. You're entitled to your opinion, but the facts are clear about the schism.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/h96ejNdqtpm9pH0.html

Trent spun the indulgences, look at what Rome said in its original decree of indulgences. This is nothing more than doing damage control.

Thanks snookie

I understand your problem. Because the problem is you. I say that respectfully. You said that you were raised in a good protestant home but God says there is none good. We're all evil sinners. You also said you couldn't believe your parents standing in line into heaven with criminals, Satanists, etc. But Jesus said he came to heal the sick not the healthy. That is, he came for the criminals, Satanists, and all evil people, not the good people. You think you're good but to who are you comparing yourself to? God said you and I are evil. Repent, Trust in the finished work of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins and you will be saved. The Catholic Church doesn't save. It's sending people to hell. Live a life of repentance following Jesus not the Pope.

@@brutus896 so, according to Protestants, it's necessary to repent of becoming a Catholic, but not of being a Satanist.

@@brutus896 where does it say that no one is good? or that we are evil? isn't repentance just confession which is from the Catholic Church?

@@tony1685 what makes Catholicism inaccurate?

He is not ignorant about the catholic church he is just evil and his father the devil use him to lie

Unfortunately not knowing what Catholicism teaches is a protestant problem. Is this ignorance or is it anti Catholic propaganda.

@@ilonkastille2993 Not knowing what Catholicism teaches is also a Catholic problem. Most Catholics don’t know the Catechism either, but in terms of prots like White, it’s the combination of ignorance and anti Catholic rhetoric that shows their true motives.

Catholics don’t know RCC either or are confused on many matters Eg I was accused of being wrong on priestly celibacy just because a Catholic didn’t believe in it…

@@TheBadTrad yes I agree with you on that. Especially now in the secular age. The difference I really wanted to point out was that "learned, educated in religion" Protestants do not know what Catholicism is. Educated in religion like White, is saying all the wrong things . When you listen to a discussion between a Protestant expert and a Catholic expert who have degrees in theology etc. the Protestant is ALWAYS citing facts about Catholicism which are not true.

P A T A M A S A B A P T I S T

Rather, it's a shame that the Council of Trent has painted the BIBLE with such a false and nasty brush of the pen! As I said elsewhere (and to which you will not respond of course)... Mr. Horn is wasting his LIFE trying to promote a non-prophet organization, and here's why. Specifically, the catechism quotes the Council of Trent (which claimed to be guided by the Holy Spirit TWICE in their decree on the Eucharist) and states that the Catholic religion may be SUMMARIZED in one sentence --which, as will be shown, just happens to be a lie. I've mentioned this on other of his videos, but of course, he is speechless. So buckle your seat belts. Notice the words in caps... “Christ our Redeemer SAID that it was TRULY his body he was OFFERING [in sacrifice at the Last SUpper] ...." (CCC 1376). Aside from the fact it is point blank, flatly unbiblical to assert that Christ "offered himself in sacrifice at the Last Supper BEFORRRRRE he went to the cross" (CCC 621), the worse error is to misquote Jesus Christ who DID NOT SAY that the bread was "TRUUUUUUULY" his body. He said, "This is my body", period, not that the bread was "TRUUUULY" his body. Obviously, the magisterium felt the biblical account was inadequate to stand on its own, and so in reaction to the Reformers, they stuck a word in Christ's mouth to force their position down the gullible laity's throats pretending the Holy Spirit was guiding them. NONSENSE. Now the fact is, the words, "This is" are shown to be metaphorical by at least 50 examples throughout the biblical record, whereas papal pundits simply ASSERT, without a scrap of evidence, that Jesus was speaking literally! If they want to risk their souls on that (since those VERY WORDS they MISQUOTE Jesus as saying actually SUMMARIZE their whole life's existence!), then so be it. We have warned them. As a result of their being guilty of adding to the word of God, all claims for infallibility come tumbling down, not to mention anything they say about the Eucharist is to be rejected as well. Now the fact is, it is up to the Christian to decipher the Lord's meaning FROM THE TEXT, and not from the circus of Catholic apologetic clowns who came after it. Hence, based on the fact Jesus is gravely concerned about the sanctity of his word down to the last “jot and tittle” (Matt 5:18), that one, single gross addition to the word of God (namely, "TRULY") is like a flashing neon sign that ANY non-catholic explanation regarding the words "This is"... should be preferred over and against what the Pope has to say. Therefore, Transubstantiation is unsubstantiated and unsustainable due to the council claiming to be infallible, but in fact, have been found to be liars (Rev 2:2; cf: Deut 18:22, Jer 23:30-40, Ezekiel 13:1-7). It is promised in those passages that all who recklessly wag their tongues by asserting, “The Lord says”, (when the Lord did not say), will be swiftly cast out of his presence (cf. Jeremiah 14:14, 23:16-21). Since CCC 1376 is biblically bankrupt, yet decreed by a supposedly “infallible” council (CCC 888-892) the case for Transubstantiation and Infallibility falls flat and Catholicism is instantly exposed as a “non-prophet” organization (Eph 5:11).

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q52BbKmEvdfZgZs.html

Does the Catholic "church" do _itself_ any favours by believing in an _infallible_ "Sacred Inquisition" to kill all the "heretics" and Protestants, or teaching her blind and deluded followers to worship the Antichrist (in the place of Christ) instead of Jesus Christ?? Blasphemous titles claimed for the pope have been embellished and enlarged over the centuries. But a few of these boastful claims appear in an ecclesiastical (Roman Catholic) dictionary, by Lucius Ferraris, entitled _Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica,_ Vol. VI, pgs. 438, 442, article "Pope." _The Catholic Encyclopedia,_ 1913 edition, Vol. VI, p. 48, speaks of this book as "a veritable encyclopedia of religious knowledge," and "a precious mine of information." "The pope is of so great dignity and so exalted that he is not a mere man, but as it were God, and the vicar of God." "The pope is of such lofty and supreme dignity that, properly speaking, he has not been established in any rank of dignity, but rather has been placed upon the very summit of all ranks of dignities. . . ." "He is likewise the divine monarch and supreme emperor and king of kings." "Hence the pope is crowned with a triple crown, as king of heaven and of earth and of the lower regions." "So that if it were possible that the angels might err in the faith, or might think contrary to the faith, they could be judged and excommunicated by the pope." "The pope is as it were God on earth, sole sovereign of the faithful of Christ, chief king of kings, having plenitude of power, to whom has been entrusted by the omnipotent God direction not only of the earthly but also of the heavenly kingdom." "The pope can modify divine law, since his power is not of man but of God." The above quotes are from _What's Behind The New World Order?_ Go to CatholicNewWorldOrder.com and click on the top link. ---------- "I am all in all and *above all,* so that God, Himself and I, the Vicar of God, have but one consistory, and I am able to do ALMOST ALL THAT GOD CAN DO . . . What therefore, can you make of me but God?" -Pope Nicholas, quoted in _Antichrist_ by Ian Paisley, pg. 54. The pope calls himself God, i.e., "Lord God the pope," "another God on earth." "We hold upon this earth the place of God Almighty," Pope Leo XIII said in an _Encyclical Letter,_ June 20, 1894. "The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, but he is Jesus Christ Himself, hidden under veil of flesh," the _Catholic National_ said in July 1895. And every priest is an "Alter Christus," Another Christ. So every priest is Jesus. Plus, during the Mass the priest transubstantiates the bread into the literal, "real presence" of Christ. In other words, man creates God. "He is the creator of his Creator." _-The Dignity and Duties of the Priest_ by Liguori, Ch. 1, Part IV. How is any of this _not_ blasphemy?! Christianity teaches that the pope is the Antichrist. The proud pontiff's official title is Vicar of Christ, meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ translated into Greek is Antichristos, in English Antichrist, also meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ and Antichrist are the exact same word in two different languages. Vicar of Christ in Latin is Vicarius Filii Dei, meaning Vicar of the Son of God, or Vicar of Christ. VICARIVS FILII DEI. Add up the 11 Roman numerals and you get 666. Rev. 13:18. angelfire.com/on/3angels Revelation 13. 1 I . . . saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns . . . and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. 2 And _the _*_dragon (Satan)_*_ gave him (the beast) his power, and his seat,_ and great authority. 4 And _they worshipped the _*_dragon_*_ which gave power unto the beast:_ and they worshipped the beast . . . 5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies . . . 6 And he opened his mouth in *blasphemy against God,* to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, *_Come out of her,_** my people,* that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities." Rev. 18:4, 5.

@YAJUN YUAN I'm sorry he does

@YAJUN YUAN He does.

@YAJUN YUAN kzfaq.info/get/bejne/epuIjbV71bLDoGg.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rpyJh91ep5iYdnU.html

I know we are the only one that does exorcisms. It doesn’t even make sense.

Satan loves Catholicism.

@@tony1685 Nobody is justified by faith alone. Christ is the Lord of Sabbath.

@@tony1685 Christ is the Lord, the early Christians chose to worship on Sunday to show that Christ is the Lord of Sabbath just as we no longer circumcise to be counted as people of God. Don't forget Yahweh told Abraham that any who doesn't circumcise should not be part of his people, Today, Faith and baptism has replaced that. Christ is the Lord.

@@tony1685 There's plenty of proofs from the ancient world, dated as back as the very 1st century, that TESTIFYING the "Day of The Lord" (Dominica, sunday), "The Day of The Sun" and "The First day of the week" or the "8th day of the week" to be the day that early christians, especially ex-pagans, used to rest and celebrate mass. While there are obviously proofs that the converted hebrew still used the Sabbath, it's pretty clear that the use of Sunday as the day to rest was attested since...well, forever. Even StPaul talks about it (1 Cor 16) or Acts 20, 7..."to spread the bread" it's used to say "celebrating Mass". You are free to celebrate on Saturday if you want; as long as you believe and worship the Christ I call you my brother. But stop bragging around. I suggest you to read the 3rd and 4th chapter from the 1st Letter of Peter. May you find some discernment in it.

@@collinssheen8462 True. The 7th day, not the papal Sunday.

@@collinssheen8462 Absolutely wrong. Have you read acts 13-18? The early Gentile Christians chose, along with Paul, to gather on the SEVENTH day, and labor on the other six. Just like Jesus said. Nobody cares for that unpopular part of scripture.

Welcome to the Church!

Pastors know about Catholicism. They know & They disagree.

Would this turn you away again and to Christ instead?: Blasphemous titles claimed for the pope have been embellished and enlarged over the centuries. But a few of these boastful claims appear in an ecclesiastical (Roman Catholic) dictionary, by Lucius Ferraris, entitled _Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica,_ Vol. VI, pgs. 438, 442, article "Pope." _The Catholic Encyclopedia,_ 1913 edition, Vol. VI, p. 48, speaks of this book as "a veritable encyclopedia of religious knowledge," and "a precious mine of information." "The pope is of so great dignity and so exalted that he is not a mere man, but as it were God, and the vicar of God." "The pope is of such lofty and supreme dignity that, properly speaking, he has not been established in any rank of dignity, but rather has been placed upon the very summit of all ranks of dignities. . . ." "He is likewise the divine monarch and supreme emperor and king of kings." "Hence the pope is crowned with a triple crown, as king of heaven and of earth and of the lower regions." "So that if it were possible that the angels might err in the faith, or might think contrary to the faith, they could be judged and excommunicated by the pope." "The pope is as it were God on earth, sole sovereign of the faithful of Christ, chief king of kings, having plenitude of power, to whom has been entrusted by the omnipotent God direction not only of the earthly but also of the heavenly kingdom." "The pope can modify divine law, since his power is not of man but of God." The above quotes are from _What's Behind The New World Order?_ Go to CatholicNewWorldOrder.com and click on the top link. ---------- "I am all in all and *above all,* so that God, Himself and I, the Vicar of God, have but one consistory, and I am able to do ALMOST ALL THAT GOD CAN DO . . . What therefore, can you make of me but God?" -Pope Nicholas, quoted in _Antichrist_ by Ian Paisley, pg. 54. The pope calls himself God, i.e., "Lord God the pope," "another God on earth." "We hold upon this earth the place of God Almighty," Pope Leo XIII said in an _Encyclical Letter,_ June 20, 1894. "The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, but he is Jesus Christ Himself, hidden under veil of flesh," the _Catholic National_ said in July 1895. And every priest is an "Alter Christus," Another Christ. So every priest is Jesus. Plus, during the Mass the priest transubstantiates the bread into the literal, "real presence" of Christ. In other words, man creates God. "He is the creator of his Creator." _-The Dignity and Duties of the Priest_ by Liguori, Ch. 1, Part IV. How is any of this _not_ blasphemy?! Christianity teaches that the pope is the Antichrist. The proud pontiff's official title is Vicar of Christ, meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ translated into Greek is Antichristos, in English Antichrist, also meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ and Antichrist are the exact same word in two different languages. Vicar of Christ in Latin is Vicarius Filii Dei, meaning Vicar of the Son of God, or Vicar of Christ. VICARIVS FILII DEI. Add up the 11 Roman numerals and you get 666. Rev. 13:18. angelfire.com/on/3angels Revelation 13. 1 I . . . saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns . . . and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. 2 And _the _*_dragon (Satan)_*_ gave him (the beast) his power, and his seat,_ and great authority. 4 And _they worshipped the _*_dragon_*_ which gave power unto the beast:_ and they worshipped the beast . . . 5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies . . . 6 And he opened his mouth in *blasphemy against God,* to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, *_Come out of her,_** my people,* that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities." Rev. 18:4, 5.

"Judgmental" is not when you speak an unpleasant truth or moral boundary. A judge doesn't _teach_ the law; he _punishes_ people for breaking it. To judge is to punish. Punish not lest ye be punished. Not, Teach not lest ye be taught unpopular or upsetting doctrines or morals. It's okay to upset people with God's truth. It's not okay to punish them for not following it.

@@floogelhornzzz4770 Please read the book of Judges. God's Judges were not sent to punish Israel, but to save Israel. Jesus Christ is God's ultimate Judge, not sent to punish us, but to save us.

@@tony1685 We neither make nor bow to idols.

@YAJUN YUAN One is a statue of a person who very likely never actually existed, the other is a statue of the mother of God

Ignore tony folks, he's constantly trolling

@@tony1685 And when the second person of God became incarnate, what woman did He choose to conceive Him in her womb, to bear and to raise Him?

Most anti Catholics are X Catholics and those who argue they have more knowledge than Jesus Christ.

Welcome home to the Catholic Church🤍 The heaven is rejoicing!

So it can only be catholic or Calvinist? What about everything in between? I’m not a catholic or Calvinist, just a regular Christian

Satan did that. I was reading God's Word and what He says so I left the Catholic church.

@@endtimesareuponus8930 I highly doubt you were Catholic to begin with.

How do you reply to this?: Blasphemous titles claimed for the pope have been embellished and enlarged over the centuries. But a few of these boastful claims appear in an ecclesiastical (Roman Catholic) dictionary, by Lucius Ferraris, entitled _Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica,_ Vol. VI, pgs. 438, 442, article "Pope." _The Catholic Encyclopedia,_ 1913 edition, Vol. VI, p. 48, speaks of this book as "a veritable encyclopedia of religious knowledge," and "a precious mine of information." "The pope is of so great dignity and so exalted that he is not a mere man, but as it were God, and the vicar of God." "The pope is of such lofty and supreme dignity that, properly speaking, he has not been established in any rank of dignity, but rather has been placed upon the very summit of all ranks of dignities. . . ." "He is likewise the divine monarch and supreme emperor and king of kings." "Hence the pope is crowned with a triple crown, as king of heaven and of earth and of the lower regions." "So that if it were possible that the angels might err in the faith, or might think contrary to the faith, they could be judged and excommunicated by the pope." "The pope is as it were God on earth, sole sovereign of the faithful of Christ, chief king of kings, having plenitude of power, to whom has been entrusted by the omnipotent God direction not only of the earthly but also of the heavenly kingdom." "The pope can modify divine law, since his power is not of man but of God." The above quotes are from _What's Behind The New World Order?_ Go to CatholicNewWorldOrder.com and click on the top link. ---------- "I am all in all and *above all,* so that God, Himself and I, the Vicar of God, have but one consistory, and I am able to do ALMOST ALL THAT GOD CAN DO . . . What therefore, can you make of me but God?" -Pope Nicholas, quoted in _Antichrist_ by Ian Paisley, pg. 54. The pope calls himself God, i.e., "Lord God the pope," "another God on earth." "We hold upon this earth the place of God Almighty," Pope Leo XIII said in an _Encyclical Letter,_ June 20, 1894. "The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, but he is Jesus Christ Himself, hidden under veil of flesh," the _Catholic National_ said in July 1895. And every priest is an "Alter Christus," Another Christ. So every priest is Jesus. Plus, during the Mass the priest transubstantiates the bread into the literal, "real presence" of Christ. In other words, man creates God. "He is the creator of his Creator." _-The Dignity and Duties of the Priest_ by Liguori, Ch. 1, Part IV. How is any of this _not_ blasphemy?! Christianity teaches that the pope is the Antichrist. The proud pontiff's official title is Vicar of Christ, meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ translated into Greek is Antichristos, in English Antichrist, also meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ and Antichrist are the exact same word in two different languages. Vicar of Christ in Latin is Vicarius Filii Dei, meaning Vicar of the Son of God, or Vicar of Christ. VICARIVS FILII DEI. Add up the 11 Roman numerals and you get 666. Rev. 13:18. angelfire.com/on/3angels Revelation 13. 1 I . . . saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns . . . and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. 2 And _the _*_dragon (Satan)_*_ gave him (the beast) his power, and his seat,_ and great authority. 4 And _they worshipped the _*_dragon_*_ which gave power unto the beast:_ and they worshipped the beast . . . 5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies . . . 6 And he opened his mouth in *blasphemy against God,* to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, *_Come out of her,_** my people,* that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities." Rev. 18:4, 5.

@@floogelhornzzz4770 nothing! Here! Is! Accurate! Or even remotely close!

Amen to all of this!!

Come home to Rome Rico! We need good people like you. 😇🙏🏽

Beware of the worship of Mary.

@@colepriceguitar1153 - Catholics don’t worship Mary

@@theticoboy look up Pope Pius xii prayer to Mary.

@@colepriceguitar1153 even if I did agree that was considered worship, it is not official church teaching. The church has very specific teachings in Mary. You may disagree with them but to misrepresent church teaching is dishonest. Now would it be fair to say your church teaches dishonesty based on your behavior?

Satan loves Catholicism. Jesus was not subtle about sin. I worship Him not Luther.

Easy on the tourette’s joke

St. Igantious felt differently in 110 AD lol

Roman Catholic Church began through Peter and the apostles in 33 ad in the first century not 12:15

@YAJUN YUAN nope. Every single teaching of the Catholic Church today was in the deposit of faith given by Jesus Christ to the Apostles. Nothing has been added, nothing has been removed.

@YAJUN YUAN If that's your criteria for determining the beginning of the RCC, then it didn't begin until 1854, which the last time a dogma was declared. I wonder what Church Luther was protesting against then?

People cant make up their mind lol first you hear “catholicism started in the 4th century” next you hear “catholicism started in the 11th century” and then this at 1215??😂

Awesome post. Praying you fully become RC one day. We need more good people like you! 😇🙏🏽

@@theticoboy thank you brother. God bless you for your intercession on my behalf in the name of the Father Son and Spirit? 🙏🏻

The Early Fathers are amazing! Praying for your journey, brother! ❤

Because Christ isn’t on the cross anymore 🤨 This isn’t even a valid criticism as there are some with Christ on their crosses

@@duckymomo7935 yeah, that's the Protestant talking point. Yet they still have other images of Christ, but don't say "Christ isn't a baby anymore," for instance. Also, I said it's a visual metaphor, not a philosophical argument. If you looked outside of a Planned Parenthood and saw a barren wasteland full of dead trees and shrubs, but across the street was a green, thriving conservative women's pregnancy center, you would say it's a visual metaphor for what's happening spiritually. That doesn't make it a philosophical argument. Yet again, the Protestant demonstrates that their theology is deficient in that it lacks the understanding of the importance of all three transcendentals: truth, beauty, and goodness. You only have a partial grasp of truth and goodness, and have completely handed over beauty to Satan and his human minions, which they have masterfully used to attack Christianity through the arts (media, film, etc).

While I agree it's an ironic metaphor here, I don't think it should be an argument Catholics use unless it's a sticking point for the Protestant (and then we just cite 1 Cor 1:23) because some Eastern Catholic Churches don't feature the corpus on their crosses.

@@renjithjoseph7135 Crucifix is only to remind us of the sacrifice. The Holy Mass is supposed to symbolise the Calvary. Traditionally priest should be facing the altar not the people (ad orientem) as if he is under the cross in the moment of crucifixion. This is profoundly symbolical and reverent way. Its focused on the sacrifice, contemplation. and mystery of it all. I recommend you to watch The Mass of the ages documentary.

Do catholics want Jesus to stay on the cross instead of resurrection? Maybe that's why they claim to really recreate the creator with actual flesh and blood.

Please, see the doctor. Those separated are those who heed the words of Christ in Revelation 17 to COME OUT of the mother harlot, the papacy. You too are advised to come out before her flesh is burned with fire.

Yes, please pray to the Doctor/Healer (Jesus) to help you see Catholicism is heresy. I left the Catholic church cause I stand with God's Word, the Bible.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q52BbKmEvdfZgZs.html

God bless you in discerning God’s will in your vocation.

@@tony1685 hahahahahahahahahaha

@@tony1685 don't get your panties In a twist

But why be a priest for the Antichrist (in the place of Christ) if you'll just end up in hell for it? 🔥 Blasphemous titles claimed for the pope have been embellished and enlarged over the centuries. But a few of these boastful claims appear in an ecclesiastical (Roman Catholic) dictionary, by Lucius Ferraris, entitled _Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica,_ Vol. VI, pgs. 438, 442, article "Pope." _The Catholic Encyclopedia,_ 1913 edition, Vol. VI, p. 48, speaks of this book as "a veritable encyclopedia of religious knowledge," and "a precious mine of information." "The pope is of so great dignity and so exalted that he is not a mere man, but as it were God, and the vicar of God." "The pope is of such lofty and supreme dignity that, properly speaking, he has not been established in any rank of dignity, but rather has been placed upon the very summit of all ranks of dignities. . . ." "He is likewise the divine monarch and supreme emperor and king of kings." "Hence the pope is crowned with a triple crown, as king of heaven and of earth and of the lower regions." "So that if it were possible that the angels might err in the faith, or might think contrary to the faith, they could be judged and excommunicated by the pope." "The pope is as it were God on earth, sole sovereign of the faithful of Christ, chief king of kings, having plenitude of power, to whom has been entrusted by the omnipotent God direction not only of the earthly but also of the heavenly kingdom." "The pope can modify divine law, since his power is not of man but of God." The above quotes are from _What's Behind The New World Order?_ Go to CatholicNewWorldOrder.com and click on the top link. ---------- "I am all in all and *above all,* so that God, Himself and I, the Vicar of God, have but one consistory, and I am able to do ALMOST ALL THAT GOD CAN DO . . . What therefore, can you make of me but God?" -Pope Nicholas, quoted in _Antichrist_ by Ian Paisley, pg. 54. The pope calls himself God, i.e., "Lord God the pope," "another God on earth." "We hold upon this earth the place of God Almighty," Pope Leo XIII said in an _Encyclical Letter,_ June 20, 1894. "The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, but he is Jesus Christ Himself, hidden under veil of flesh," the _Catholic National_ said in July 1895. And every priest is an "Alter Christus," Another Christ. So every priest is Jesus. Plus, during the Mass the priest transubstantiates the bread into the literal, "real presence" of Christ. In other words, man creates God. "He is the creator of his Creator." _-The Dignity and Duties of the Priest_ by Liguori, Ch. 1, Part IV. How is any of this _not_ blasphemy?! Christianity teaches that the pope is the Antichrist. The proud pontiff's official title is Vicar of Christ, meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ translated into Greek is Antichristos, in English Antichrist, also meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ and Antichrist are the exact same word in two different languages. Vicar of Christ in Latin is Vicarius Filii Dei, meaning Vicar of the Son of God, or Vicar of Christ. VICARIVS FILII DEI. Add up the 11 Roman numerals and you get 666. Rev. 13:18. angelfire.com/on/3angels Revelation 13. 1 I . . . saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns . . . and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. 2 And _the _*_dragon (Satan)_*_ gave him (the beast) his power, and his seat,_ and great authority. 4 And _they worshipped the _*_dragon_*_ which gave power unto the beast:_ and they worshipped the beast . . . 5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies . . . 6 And he opened his mouth in *blasphemy against God,* to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, *_Come out of her,_** my people,* that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities." Rev. 18:4, 5.

Read Rome Sweet Home by Scott Hahn, Mr. Joseph. I will ask that your name sake, St. Joseph, will pray for you to become Catholic.

@@tony1685 Revelation 8:3 3T hen another angel, who had a golden censer, came and stood at the altar. He was given much incense to offer, along with the prayers of all the saints, on the golden altar before the throne. 4And the smoke of the incense, together with the prayers of the saints, rose up before God from the hand of the angel.

Hebrews 12:1 We are surrounded by a great cloud of witnesses.

@@tony1685 Revelation 5: 7 And He came and took the scroll from the right hand of the One seated on the throne. 8 When He had taken the scroll, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb. Each one had a harp, and they were holding golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints

@@tony1685 Jerome: “You say in your book that while we live we are able to pray for each other, but afterwards when we have died, the prayer of no person for another can be heard. . . . But if the apostles and martyrs while still in the body can pray for others, at a time when they ought still be solicitous about themselves, how much more will they do so after their crowns, victories, and triumphs?” (Against Vigilantius 6 [A.D. 406]).

This! We have both Protestants and Catholics in my family and, although there are some clear differences on tradition and even dogma, we unite in our belief, faith and love of Christ and each other. No accusations, name calling, useless bickering, etc.

@@danapb Thanks for sharing your experience, Dana. I'm glad you have such harmony despite religious differences.

@@danapbDana That is ridiculous situation that demonstrates that your family does not appear to value truth.

I can't even tolerate listening to their eschatology lol. I've been praying to increase in patience and charity.

That’s the original use of the term “tolerance”. Catholics and Protestants were told to *tolerate* each other rather than fight each other. They had far more similarities than differences and tolerance of the differences should be based on the similarities.

@YAJUN YUAN 🥱😴😴

The difference is that the Church finds the justification for her existence in the will of her founder, Christ our Lord while protestants find the justification of the existence of their churches in the premise that the Church is wrong or have been corrupted. Thus, there is no symmetry. The Church really doesn't need to speak about how wrong protestants are in order for her to be right. What is funnier is when a protestant group splits from another over issue of doctrine, it will most always be more anti-catholic than anti their mother-group despite their split with the latter being more recent and direct than with the Church.

@YAJUN YUAN They rather preach the truth of the gospel instead of ranting about other “churches”.

@@tony1685 Tony Tony Tony ...... I don't have time to waste with you. I don't care about your individual human opinion. Blessings.

​@@tony1685Look dude. You are not worth my time, I have better use of it. Every human opinion of yours will always be entirely worthless. Whatever I will be destined to is not your business and you can't change it since I am destined to. But you can keep thinking high of your human opinion what if that makes you sleep well in the night, it is your right.

It sort of reminds me of people (mainly on the internet and most noticeably Twitter) demanding apologies but have not intention of laying it to rest. Now I’m not on one to hold modern people to the actions/crimes of the past, but I can see an argument where settling it apologetic words and a desire to move forward is a good practice. Bring everything that happened to the table, let me people air out their thoughts, identify where the issues happened, and move on. The Galileo apology is actually what got me researching into the Affair, and has led me to other so-called ‘atrocities’ of the Church that turned out to be completely false or terribly mis-fabricated. Once the truth is acknowledged and apologies said, though, then that’s when it should be left and both sides move on.

Money and power lead to this

His sister has already become catholic. He also chaired a debate with Mormons and lost (Mormons actually used some of patrick madrids arguments) white is desperate and pathetic, can’t even defend the doctrine of Christianity.

My thoughts as well it’s like deep down he knows he wrong but his pride is in the way and hate

He lost his sister to it :)

I followed the truth and it led to Catholicism (former baptist) - spoiler catholic means universal Christian and is closer to Christianity that any so called reformed position.

There is a Charismatic Catholic community, maybe you wanna take a look my friend Love your Channel

Hey Testify! I like watching your videos!

Spare us your praise for Mr. Horn. He is 100% LOST by believing in "another jesus and another gospel" per 2 Cor 11:4. And so are you. As I said elsewhere... Mr. Horn is wasting his LIFE trying to promote a non-prophet organization, and here's why. Specifically, the catechism quotes the Council of Trent (which claimed to be guided by the Holy Spirit TWICE in their decree on the Eucharist) and states that the Catholic religion may be SUMMARIZED in one sentence --which, as will be shown, just happens to be a lie. I've mentioned this on other of his videos, but of course, he is speechless. So buckle your seat belts. Notice the words in caps... “Christ our Redeemer SAID that it was TRULY his body he was OFFERING [in sacrifice at the Last SUpper] ...." (CCC 1376). Aside from the fact it is point blank, flatly unbiblical to assert that Christ "offered himself in sacrifice at the Last Supper BEFORRRRRE he went to the cross" (CCC 621), the worse error is to misquote Jesus Christ who DID NOT SAY that the bread was "TRUUUUUUULY" his body. He said, "This is my body", period, not that the bread was "TRUUUULY" his body. Obviously, the magisterium felt the biblical account was inadequate to stand on its own, and so in reaction to the Reformers, they stuck a word in Christ's mouth to force their position down the gullible laity's throats pretending the Holy Spirit was guiding them. NONSENSE. Now the fact is, the words, "This is" are shown to be metaphorical by at least 50 examples throughout the biblical record, whereas papal pundits simply ASSERT, without a scrap of evidence, that Jesus was speaking literally! If they want to risk their souls on that (since those VERY WORDS they MISQUOTE Jesus as saying actually SUMMARIZE their whole life's existence!), then so be it. We have warned them. As a result of their being guilty of adding to the word of God, all claims for infallibility come tumbling down, not to mention anything they say about the Eucharist is to be rejected as well. Now the fact is, it is up to the Christian to decipher the Lord's meaning FROM THE TEXT, and not from the circus of Catholic apologetic clowns who came after it. Hence, based on the fact Jesus is gravely concerned about the sanctity of his word down to the last “jot and tittle” (Matt 5:18), that one, single gross addition to the word of God (namely, "TRULY") is like a flashing neon sign that ANY non-catholic explanation regarding the words "This is"... should be preferred over and against what the Pope has to say. Therefore, Transubstantiation is unsubstantiated and unsustainable due to the council claiming to be infallible, but in fact, have been found to be liars (Rev 2:2; cf: Deut 18:22, Jer 23:30-40, Ezekiel 13:1-7). It is promised in those passages that all who recklessly wag their tongues by asserting, “The Lord says”, (when the Lord did not say), will be swiftly cast out of his presence (cf. Jeremiah 14:14, 23:16-21). Since CCC 1376 is biblically bankrupt, yet decreed by a supposedly “infallible” council (CCC 888-892) the case for Transubstantiation and Infallibility falls flat and Catholicism is instantly exposed as a “non-prophet” organization (Eph 5:11).

What about the title VICARIUS FILII DEI? Blasphemy.

Sadly, it contains truth. The papacy has martyred (murdered) more saints than any other institution. Millions, in fact. Satan does love that. He also lives that the jesuit extreme oath of induction calls for murdering Protestant mothers and their infants any time the pope orders it.

🤣

They used to believe that before the 60’s.

The angel told Mary what was going to happen. He was not asking for her permission.

@@Justas399 So God forced himself upon Mary?

@YAJUN YUAN Like I said, to Protestants Mary was just a birthing person, discarded after her birthing role was complete. So sad and an offense to our Lord Jesus Christ.

@YAJUN YUAN Do you not think that Jesus keeps the command to “honor thy father and mother” even now? Jesus calls us his “brothers and sisters” so Mary is our mother too. Most importantly, Jesus gives his mother to John who represents the Church. “Behold your mother”. He wasn’t just tying up loose ends before he died. And the Bible says all generations will call her blessed. Can you even utter the words the Blessed Mother? It is Mary who magnifies the Lord. Know Mary, Know Jesus no Mary, no Jesus.

@YAJUN YUAN Blessed does not mean fortunate.

@@tony1685 You are a d*mb*ss or a bad person. Maybe both.

@@tony1685 who gave us the Bible again?

@YAJUN YUAN what human compiled the word of God, and can it not be said that when they compiled the cannon they had authority over us that was granted to them by the Holy Spirit?

@@tony1685 Nah!

@YAJUN YUAN There are other authorities other and the Bible. Even Protestants believe this.

Evangelists were preaching in the book of Acts and even before. God gave evangelists as a gift long before a papacy was devised by Constantine.

Spare us your praise for Mr. Horn. He is 100% LOST by believing in "another jesus and another gospel" per 2 Cor 11:4. And so are you. As I said elsewhere... Mr. Horn is wasting his LIFE trying to promote a non-prophet organization, and here's why. Specifically, the catechism quotes the Council of Trent (which claimed to be guided by the Holy Spirit TWICE in their decree on the Eucharist) and states that the Catholic religion may be SUMMARIZED in one sentence --which, as will be shown, just happens to be a lie. I've mentioned this on other of his videos, but of course, he is speechless. So buckle your seat belts. Notice the words in caps... “Christ our Redeemer SAID that it was TRULY his body he was OFFERING [in sacrifice at the Last SUpper] ...." (CCC 1376). Aside from the fact it is point blank, flatly unbiblical to assert that Christ "offered himself in sacrifice at the Last Supper BEFORRRRRE he went to the cross" (CCC 621), the worse error is to misquote Jesus Christ who DID NOT SAY that the bread was "TRUUUUUUULY" his body. He said, "This is my body", period, not that the bread was "TRUUUULY" his body. Obviously, the magisterium felt the biblical account was inadequate to stand on its own, and so in reaction to the Reformers, they stuck a word in Christ's mouth to force their position down the gullible laity's throats pretending the Holy Spirit was guiding them. NONSENSE. Now the fact is, the words, "This is" are shown to be metaphorical by at least 50 examples throughout the biblical record, whereas papal pundits simply ASSERT, without a scrap of evidence, that Jesus was speaking literally! If they want to risk their souls on that (since those VERY WORDS they MISQUOTE Jesus as saying actually SUMMARIZE their whole life's existence!), then so be it. We have warned them. As a result of their being guilty of adding to the word of God, all claims for infallibility come tumbling down, not to mention anything they say about the Eucharist is to be rejected as well. Now the fact is, it is up to the Christian to decipher the Lord's meaning FROM THE TEXT, and not from the circus of Catholic apologetic clowns who came after it. Hence, based on the fact Jesus is gravely concerned about the sanctity of his word down to the last “jot and tittle” (Matt 5:18), that one, single gross addition to the word of God (namely, "TRULY") is like a flashing neon sign that ANY non-catholic explanation regarding the words "This is"... should be preferred over and against what the Pope has to say. Therefore, Transubstantiation is unsubstantiated and unsustainable due to the council claiming to be infallible, but in fact, have been found to be liars (Rev 2:2; cf: Deut 18:22, Jer 23:30-40, Ezekiel 13:1-7). It is promised in those passages that all who recklessly wag their tongues by asserting, “The Lord says”, (when the Lord did not say), will be swiftly cast out of his presence (cf. Jeremiah 14:14, 23:16-21). Since CCC 1376 is biblically bankrupt, yet decreed by a supposedly “infallible” council (CCC 888-892) the case for Transubstantiation and Infallibility falls flat and Catholicism is instantly exposed as a “non-prophet” organization (Eph 5:11).

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q52BbKmEvdfZgZs.html

Are you proud of worshipping the Antichrist (in the place of Christ) instead of Jesus Christ? Blasphemous titles claimed for the pope have been embellished and enlarged over the centuries. But a few of these boastful claims appear in an ecclesiastical (Roman Catholic) dictionary, by Lucius Ferraris, entitled _Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica,_ Vol. VI, pgs. 438, 442, article "Pope." _The Catholic Encyclopedia,_ 1913 edition, Vol. VI, p. 48, speaks of this book as "a veritable encyclopedia of religious knowledge," and "a precious mine of information." "The pope is of so great dignity and so exalted that he is not a mere man, but as it were God, and the vicar of God." "The pope is of such lofty and supreme dignity that, properly speaking, he has not been established in any rank of dignity, but rather has been placed upon the very summit of all ranks of dignities. . . ." "He is likewise the divine monarch and supreme emperor and king of kings." "Hence the pope is crowned with a triple crown, as king of heaven and of earth and of the lower regions." "So that if it were possible that the angels might err in the faith, or might think contrary to the faith, they could be judged and excommunicated by the pope." "The pope is as it were God on earth, sole sovereign of the faithful of Christ, chief king of kings, having plenitude of power, to whom has been entrusted by the omnipotent God direction not only of the earthly but also of the heavenly kingdom." "The pope can modify divine law, since his power is not of man but of God." The above quotes are from _What's Behind The New World Order?_ Go to CatholicNewWorldOrder.com and click on the top link. ---------- "I am all in all and *above all,* so that God, Himself and I, the Vicar of God, have but one consistory, and I am able to do ALMOST ALL THAT GOD CAN DO . . . What therefore, can you make of me but God?" -Pope Nicholas, quoted in _Antichrist_ by Ian Paisley, pg. 54. The pope calls himself God, i.e., "Lord God the pope," "another God on earth." "We hold upon this earth the place of God Almighty," Pope Leo XIII said in an _Encyclical Letter,_ June 20, 1894. "The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, but he is Jesus Christ Himself, hidden under veil of flesh," the _Catholic National_ said in July 1895. And every priest is an "Alter Christus," Another Christ. So every priest is Jesus. Plus, during the Mass the priest transubstantiates the bread into the literal, "real presence" of Christ. In other words, man creates God. "He is the creator of his Creator." _-The Dignity and Duties of the Priest_ by Liguori, Ch. 1, Part IV. How is any of this _not_ blasphemy?! Christianity teaches that the pope is the Antichrist. The proud pontiff's official title is Vicar of Christ, meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ translated into Greek is Antichristos, in English Antichrist, also meaning "in the place of Christ." Vicar of Christ and Antichrist are the exact same word in two different languages. Vicar of Christ in Latin is Vicarius Filii Dei, meaning Vicar of the Son of God, or Vicar of Christ. VICARIVS FILII DEI. Add up the 11 Roman numerals and you get 666. Rev. 13:18. angelfire.com/on/3angels Revelation 13. 1 I . . . saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns . . . and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. 2 And _the _*_dragon (Satan)_*_ gave him (the beast) his power, and his seat,_ and great authority. 4 And _they worshipped the _*_dragon_*_ which gave power unto the beast:_ and they worshipped the beast . . . 5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies . . . 6 And he opened his mouth in *blasphemy against God,* to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, *_Come out of her,_** my people,* that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities." Rev. 18:4, 5.

Since the papal church is discussed in Revelation 17-18, I'd suggest you look there for the end of the story. There is fire involved.

@YAJUN YUAN He doesn't say anything here except that it was kept and brought to people who weren't at Mass.

I learned what Jesus said and left the Catholic heresy. I wanted Jesus not Catholicism.

It is obvious they lie a lot and have a ravish hate for the church and Mary satan is their father

The largest cult in the world falls at the feet of a mortal man who is worshipped. That man is the pope.

@@TIJoe-te9qu and smaller groups in Protestantism follow their pastors and preachers, thats a hypocritical thing to say about following a church leader.

Nice attempt at projection and smearing with labels. It's beyond ironic that someone from an organization that puts a mortal man on a THRONE, with cherubim on either side mimicking the mercy seat of the Ark, and calls him the "Vicarious Christ," thereby worshiping a mortal as God, should call ANY church a "cult." Worshiping a man is the definition of a cult. It's amazing how many times in history the papacy has uttered statements declared the pope to be "another God on earth" and "Christ veiled in flesh," etc. People lick his toes! Disgusting. The Bible, which catholics say is a catholic book, calls for pastors and evangelists. So you should know why they exist. Ironically, all these denominations exist due to PAPAL OPPRESSION. The Reformers had a work to do in getting the Bible out of papist control and into people's hands. In the process, they ALL realized the papacy was the only power that fit the definition of antichrist. Terrified, the pope's Jesuits were launched to smother the Reformation. Since the Bible was now unstoppable, they perverted it with the counter-reformation, which splintered Christianity into fragmented denominations and introduced the jesuit-devised doctrine of dispensationalism, to get the heat off the pope. So, again, the truth of Protestant reform was crippled by the Papacy itself, instead of progressing into one faith as in the beginning. The false catholic boast of being "one true church " is just a random declaration that is completely inaccurate. The true church would not match the Bible descriptions of the biggest counterfeit church, nor would it persecute the saints in the dark ages, nor hide the Bible from the people until the printing press ended that monopoly, nor incorporate all the pagan relics and abominations that the papacy did to attract pagans into Romanism. Protestantism came into bring to protest the gross errors, oppression, and abominations of history's biggest cult, and its elevation of a mortal, often EXTREMELY sinful man, to the position of God on earth. Its like equating the pope with the Holy Spirit. That is blasphemy. Defenders of the world's biggest cult, giving homage to sinful popes as God or Christ, and even kissing his sweaty feet as he sits on the counterfeit mercy seat between fake cherubim, would be pure hypocrites to call any Protestant church a cult. Then again, perhaps there's a grain of truth. Many evangelical churches have dropped the Protestant label, as they are now declaring love for the pope, and long have embraced and defended the papal coup, the transferring of Sabbath to Sunday, which the papacy has bragged about. Soon they will join hands to enforce a universal Sun Day law, which will be the mark of the Roman beast that ordained it. As an aside, have you as a papist EVER read the jesuit extreme oath of induction? Do you even know what a brutal gang exists in your church for the express purpose of murdering non-Catholic humans? If you don't read that, you're lying to yourself. Go check it out and post your findings please. The jesuits were created to murder, at the slightest order from any pope.

@@noahgaming8833 They sometimes do, but shouldn't. Preachers are there to present truth and administrate and organize, not be followed as infallible. However, NO true Protestant group EVER places a mortal, sinful man on a throne between cherubim, as Monarch over his own small nation, and declares him to be God-on-earth or Vicarious Christ. The papacy does exactly that. Many statements by the papacy declare the pope to be God, yet papists will still deny he is elevated to that throne. NO Protestant, or even evangelical church, has kings of the earth from nearly 200 nations, come to fall at the feet of its leader, and address him as "his holiness." I have watched even US presidents do that, and wanted to vomit. Four US presidents attended the funeral of JP2. The top political powers bow to this defacto king, installed by the largest counterfeit church/state ever inspired by the adversary. Jesus said His kingdom was NOT of this world. The pope's kingdom IS of this world, and he fornicates continuously and deliciously with the corrupt kings and merchants of the earth. At least until Revelation 18 kicks in...

Christ be with you sadly because he has followers willing to ignore this dishonesty God bless you

Because he has a silver tongue. He speaks with confidence and knows how to twist and spin words to put Catholicism in the worst light. These rebuttal videos are essential to defend his fallacious straw men claims about the Church. His own wife is a converted Catholic and says White is a master at building his own straw catholic church so he can tear it down.

His wife, or his sister? I know his sister converted to Catholicism, she was on The Journey Home.