Please stop the click bate photos. Your channel is worth watching but the click bate makes me want to pass it over.

During World War I the British navy developed the first true aircraft carrier with an unobstructed flight deck, the HMS Argus, which was built on a converted merchant-ship hull. A Japanese carrier, the Hosyo, which entered service in December 1922, was the first carrier designed as such from the keel up.

Grandad Hawkins worked on the air craft carrier with wooden decks in Vallejo, California.

We need to keep all the AIRCRAFT carriers that we have in service, IN SERVICE, a major deterrent to the opposing countries

So, click bate! Nothing shown about the gen 6 carrier! No photos, nada!🤷‍♂️

Let's support the people of this country, instead of the government defense contractors.

The game changer for AA defense is laser AMS. Computer-controlled laser AMS can theoretically counter many more missiles per minute while requiring no ammunition stores.

I swear people these days couldn’t tell the truth to save their life. They have to tell lie for no freaking reason. Anyways there is absolutely nothing in this video about a 6th generation aircraft carrier. 👎

I think it's worth considering what the carrier groups accomplish during peacetime in addition to their survivability in an all-out conflict. The US projects power simultaneously in multiple theaters with it's carrier groups. The deterrent value of this much power has to be considered in reduction of force calcuations.

It's amazing that they're coming up with these billions and billions of dollars worth of military equipment that the American people had no idea they was spending on

I believe the next generation Air craft carrier will not be floating on water, but instead, will be in space, orbiting earth.

the British came up with the concept of the angled flight deck !

Ww3 1 aircraft carrier against 1 country is krazy😮

I was one of the fortunate ones stationed on the U.S.S America, CV 66, the best duty station during my inlistment in the U.S. NAVY

"US $100B Next Generation Aircraft Carrier Is Finally Ready For Action" What, the one that doesn't exist yet?

That is the most accurate American video on weapons that I have seen. Where it goes wrong, is the claim that China has no more than six hundred anti ship missiles at its disposable. Also the fact that China would even need that number. Any war with China, would involve Russia and their most modern submarines are very capable and their missiles are state of the art. This channel underestimated the number of missile hits needed to put a carrier out of action. Two hits on the deck would most likely stop any chance of launching aircraft, so in other words put it out of action for the duration of the battle. Those two missiles would do lots of damage in the lower decks, and possibly damage the lifts necessary to bring aircraft to the deck. In the era of hyposonic missiles, the carrier's escorts will be powerless to stop the missiles from getting through. The submarines of both Russia and china, would be able to lay in wait for the American fleet, with most of their systems turned off, which would make it impossible for them to be detected, until they fired their first salvo and then it would be too late. With the use of satellites, any opposing force, would know exactly where the American fleet was.

Hypersonic is just a word, like Mach.a computer calculates the path, and speed, and fires to where it is projected to be when the round the defense system fired is at the same point. Turns out having to fire more quickly is the added difficulty. A Patient missile already shot 1 down in Ukraine, and Putin had the head of the company who made hypersonic sound unbeatable arrested.

That's a lot of money to waste on what could be taken out by a single orbital hypersonic missile.

Um, I'd rather have affordable health care. More hospitals. More doctors.

No one gets sick of these irons. There are hypersonic destroyers with a range of 5,000 kilometers. If you want to keep a safe distance, the flight distance is long. Biden managed to switch his opponents to a higher gear and make them grow even stronger.

The Japanese, also, created an aircraft carrier in 1910

If 1 country can create a tsunami in direction of carrier what happen later ?

The attacker only needs one to damage or maybe stop or destroy while the defender needs to stop all. More are better.

With all the taxes forced on us we should have the best defense in this world.

Dear American Military... are ANY aircraft carriers needed in an era when manned aircraft as weapons delivery systems have been obsoleted by drones and missiles? I am a flag-waiving US Patriot and a veteran. I most Definity pro-America and very much believe in and the use of power in our Hobbsian world. But my magical future vision tells me that the new technologies will support modern military that is highly disbursed, highly automated, and near invisible. JMHO

Air craft carriers are great but wouldn't be also good to have some battle ships and destroyers as well . 😮😊👍🏼🇺🇸🇺🇸💯

Wow. Some very interesting comments on this video.

Salute you give us great information about Navy world

The Chinese don't have to sink an aircraft carrier. All that is required is to destroy the catapult/arresting systems and it's game over. That's what an aircraft carrier is about after all - launching and landing planes.

Let talk about the current state of American finances. We are broke.

Everyone has anti ship weapons chine really does

I am afraid that if the US Navy aircraft carriers go toe to toe against the Chinese military that it could be a repeat of Pearl Harbor when our once mighty battle ships were taken out with a series of low flying air attacks. The loss of a carrier could kill up to 10K of our brave Navy fighters in one sinking. I think the Navy has to do more to protect these large ships against both ballistic and cruise missile attacks. Perhaps adding directed beam weapons that can provide continuous computer controlled fire if needed to take down multiple attackers during the heat of battle. Our Space Force needs to be able to quickly target Chinese command and control satellites and disable them. This will blind the enemy. Hopefully we can also locate and take out their attack subs. We should have hypersonic tactical nukes to take out their shore batteries. or something similar. EMP bombs exploded 400 miles over China would also devastate their electrical infrastructure. The US needs to go all out against China or Russia if attacked.

We need to keep a lot's of stuff off line so they don't know what we have.

Britain had the first aircraft carrier, followed by Japan.

I guess the sats will have to go immediately. And they will

Why would you spend $100 billion on an aircraft carrier that’s only one boat and you live 5 million people on the street homeless without any food how does that make any sense I thought the aircraft carrier was supposed to exist for our security, so what are we accomplishing?

agreed. the unbelievable photos makes me pass over this website

Soo instead of the opposition targeting the entire fleet is the vessel fast enough to simply not be targeted itself?

I'm retired Navy and I'm tired of this type of reporting using concept drawing of futuristic drawings to highlight whatever ship there reporting on

I support all these expenditures on our military to protect the USA and other countries from tyrant countries. As stated highly technical weapons do not create wars but prevent them.

My only question is ? Is our OCEAN BIG ENOUGH TOO FLOAT THAT ( THING ) ?

A variant of the F-18, called the EA-18G Growler was created, incorporating the technology of the EA-6B Prowler.

our navy slows the enemy down while the army slowly gets steam. army takes months to get moving why the navy hits first..

Slamat pagi mejelang siang gimana suasana disana saudara & sehat slalu Demikuan atas kerjasamanya terima kasih saudara dunia damai

Why is all this information being released? Loose Lips, Sink Ships.

Cool

Why would you have all of that posted where anyone can look it up? Why would something like this not be classified and kept quiet?

There is nothing cutting edge about it, other than its cost.... We , and others already have employed checkmates tech ; for many many years now.... Ussr are simply placing multiple already much Proven tech from around the world ...besides the The H.E.M.P weaponry; ussr truly is still way behind....hey puter remember subs.... You're going to need those also..not just simply taking Chinese junk, and build Soviet looking craft from them.... We STILL deploy much better flexible tech, always will

But not all groups are at sea at the same time, so cost less.

Greatest love it

check the price and time to build one then get it through trials? then will it be utilised fully? massive risk vs reward

Let's just show the world what we have.

The new Big E's get bigger and bigger.

Although facts and data in this video seem OK at first glance, The analysis is probably completely wrong. Regarding number of US carrier groups, I don't know that there's any talk about changing the number. Maybe this video is mixing up the US military deployment strategy to deploy 1/3 of total number actively, 1/3 in regular maintenance and 1/3 in deep maintenance and upgrades. That matches this video's number of 4 carrier groups deployed and that's happening today. If a hot conflict with a near peer like Russia or China were to occur, not only would all the carrier groups scattered around the world redeploy to the hot spot but the carrier groups in regular maintenance might be able to deploy prematurely within a month or so. That's an impressive number of carrier force that can be brought to bear if necessary. Also, the suggested idea of swarming a single carrier (much less several) is probably theoretical but unachievable. The strategy assumes that the target would be within easy range of those weapons but unless the US is caught by surprise I'd expect that easy targets like carriers would be far out of easy range at the first sign of impending hostilities. Remember that because of US aerial refueling capabilities as well as several technological advantages, US forces have a far longer reach than China's aircraft and ships. And, as noted in this video, the really long range missiles Russia and China have are expensive and complicated. They'd also have to be very large, at least the size of small fighter aircraft and they'd have to traverse a very long way running a gauntlet of USN defenses which might include laser weapons soon. Submarines might have a better chance attacking a carrier group, but US technology is pretty good here, too. Although Russia or China might be able to get off a lucky shot, US defenses are still formidable. Bottom line is that any country should know that attacking a US carrier is like attacking the US directly and the kid gloves come off. If a carrier is attacked, successful or not it would likely trigger a full retaliation just short of nuclear weapons. That country would see the full capability of US combined forces of air force and navy and I don't know that even a Putin or Xi would want to find how that turns out.

So, the US is the undisputed leader of carriers over the past 100 years? OK, fool yourself if you want to. BUT, who invented the angled flight deck? Which two countries built the first two classic layout carriers, flat deck, island on the port side, funnels directing smoke and steam away from the flight deck, and two lifts, one forrard and one aft? The modern steam catapult was a British invention. The use of steam to launch aircraft was suggested by Commander Colin C. Mitchell RNVR, and trials on HMS Perseus, flown by pilots such as Eric "Winkle" Brown, from 1950 showed its effectiveness. Navies introduced steam catapults, capable of launching the heavier jet fighters, in the mid-1950s. The first OLS was the mirror landing aid, one of several British inventions made after the Second World War, revolutionising the design of aircraft carriers. The Mirror Landing Aid was invented by Nicholas Goodhart. It was tested on the carriers HMS Illustrious and HMS Indomitable before being introduced on British carriers in 1954 and on US carriers in 1955. You were GIVEN radar by the British, you were GIVEN the Jet Engine by the British. SO, EXACTLY, what did you ACTUALLY INVENT? No wonder the average US citizen is so thick, you tell them lies all the time.

I highly doubt the usa is behing anyone when it comes to tech. Our black projects alone is more then a lot of countries.

6 Carriers should remain active and 4 Reserve 2 on the west coast and 2 on the east coast! 1 mothballed!

Hundred BILLION ? Did you flunk math??

Video content doesn’t correlate with title announcement.

How we paying for all this?

I think that it’s fine to mothball 1/2 of the carrier groups IF it were done during a less trying time. Right now, maybe 3 BUT we need to be ready to call them back at the drop of a card!

we need more aircraft carriers and spend to the military for higher tech weapons sense we are at world war 3 and yes we are at war in world war 3 weather you like it or not so get the money to the military right away lets get building.

Good job very well done I used to be a welder in the shipyard in Newport News Virginia and I helped build the Carl Vincent

Stop the War Machine !!! Let's rebuild Detroit, let's rebuild Allentown !!! Let's improve our infrastructures !!!

What in the world does a comparison with hospitals have to do with aircraft carrier groups?

Erm the idea of a floating airstrip was an English idea and the first true aircraft carrier in the world was HMS Argus during WW1. Like really get your facts checked. Before that many country's tried to have some form of aircraft launch's from ships normally the back of Battleships of Cruisers with varying success on tiny platforms or with a rail lunching system.

Next you'll use the death star in your thumbnails

Umm nothing about a new carrier

Thank God that the military doesn't listen to most of the comments here from people that have obviously never served in the military because we would be learning Chinese!

I thought they retired the Viking a while back. I wish they hadn’t tho

What's the point of listing numbers ? Reading decimals of pi would not be more boring.

Russia is not shocked! There carriers are far more advanced compared to 30 yrs old US technology

The reason you chose to compare cost of a Carrier Strike Group [CSG] v Hospital ... wasn't by happenstance. It was a deliberate comparison Which just esposes a lack of general knowledge of who, what, when, where, how and why a hospital is built. 1. Even if the Feds could save the cost of CSG dail ops ... it couldnt just go "lets divert those funds and build a hospital" Unless its a VA or otger military hospital, that is left up to the individual states. Specifically an agency at the state, who approves and regulates hospitals, including how many hospitals per region, and how many beds each of those hospitals contain. A hospital, is generally built by private corporations, and if they want to add new beds to one of their hospitals, they must first get approval from said state agency. So, don't get people riled up over a CSG instead of a hospital.

Stop it Please. You don't know.

Who said stupid wouldn't push the button for a nuclear war oh, he's already said he would

The Brits were the first to do aircraft carriers.

I wish this video would tell the truth about CVN 78. It does not have 5 Gen aircraft as of yet. My son serves aboard this aircraft carrier. They're underway at the moment with only F18 Super Hornets and supporting aircrafts. You could look at videos of them coming in to Norway and Greece. You'll see only F18s fighters.....no 5th gen aircrafts. Just thought I'd share.

So where's the ship on the cover of this video ?!

Well at this point the paper army of the Russian's is not a threat to anyone unless maybe a third world or unarmed opponent. As Ukraine was at the beginning of hostilities.

They r sitting ducks

What about the USA's hypersonic quaterhorse ?

No mention of lasers?? I think this video is out of date. The video doesn't take into account classified US missile defense. So it is misleading.

Please stop using meters to determine length and width stop meters all together I

A private company made this video. Not AMERICA. So please stop insulting my country.

Slip shit in drive!!! Roa Aotearoa nui.

How high is it feet please.

Forgot to add lazers

I THOUGHT THE GERARLD FORD CARRIER COSTS ABOUT $ 18000000 ?

Useless in a nuclear war…..Next……..

"The idea of creating a floating runway belongs to Americans." False statement but then the facts have never stopped a YT channel on the net. The Pomms had aircraft taking off from carrier ships in WW1 (HMS Argus) and the Japanese were second the Americans were third!

Are the rumors about TR-3B Black Mantis true?

Good video, but the title has nothing to do with it... Thumbs down.

How far can a submarine Quietly go in the time it takes an enemy to bar the door?

Why did you use meters and then use miles?

THERE ARE MORE RICH PEOPLE AROUND TODAY SO THERE VOICES ARE HEARD ! MANY YEARS AGO MUCH LESS RICH PEOPLE SO PEOPLE DID WHAT THEY WERE TOLD AND THE MANY TAX PAYER'S PAYED FOR DEFENCE ! IM TRYING TO KEEP IT VERY BREAF . KIND REGARDS .

One hypersonic missile will destroy it. One million dollar missile destroys a $100 B ship rendering it obsolete.

Russian missiles will burned this expensive crap. Anytime and anywhere 😢😮😊

ANTI is pronounced ANTEE.

Imagine connecting watertight cargo containers together to form 200ft wide roadways/railways with wind/solar generation to create electrified airplane/train/pipeline(gas, oil, water...) hydroponic agriculture/aquaculture bases with housing. These electrified roadways could replace/reduce oil using ships/airplanes and increase usable surface area for food & habitate across all oceans. Electroplating non-rusting containers from toxic waste dump metal allowing easier recovery of the gold.

The USS America sank from explosives planted in specific places because they just couldn't sink it. Realistically, it survived.