USAF New Rapid Dragon Weapon: A C17 Launching 45 Cruise Missiles

  Рет қаралды 1,015,448

The Fat Electrician

The Fat Electrician

Жыл бұрын

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Merch Store & ALL Other Links:
thefatelectrician.com/
Seriously EVERYTHING is on my website
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Other channels:
COMING SOON
----------------------------------------------------------------------
MY PC SPONSOR:
Xidax PC's
www.xidax.com/?xdx=1157
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Equipment used:
www.amazon.com/shop/thefatele...

Пікірлер: 2 900
@jwayneair
@jwayneair Жыл бұрын
Brings new meaning to ‘warheads on foreheads’. It’s like the Amazon Prime of warfare.
@donaldploger5630
@donaldploger5630 Жыл бұрын
Ya, you should market the hell out of that phrase
@soonerfrac4611
@soonerfrac4611 Жыл бұрын
Hercules home delivery service.
@Bobcat_X
@Bobcat_X Жыл бұрын
That takes "1-day rush" to a new level
@Reniu87
@Reniu87 Жыл бұрын
Yup dragon prime right there! Nice catch phrase man!
@Ratkill9000
@Ratkill9000 Жыл бұрын
Just air drop it anywhere within a 600mi radius.
@willracer1jz
@willracer1jz Жыл бұрын
I'm a retired USAF C-130 Crew Chief, as much as we want to take credit for yeeting the parachute out, that's the Loadmasters job. The equipment we maintain lets the Loadmaster yeet the parachute.
@NexAura1
@NexAura1 Жыл бұрын
And that chodemaster, ahem load master, is probably an E-4-E-6, lol.
@G4Disco
@G4Disco Жыл бұрын
Came here to say this as well.
@dremwolf5419
@dremwolf5419 Жыл бұрын
As a former F-111A Crew Chief I was going to post the same. But you Flying Crew Chiefs would have a better chance at assisting with the deployment than us fighter CC's.
@letsexplainit5479
@letsexplainit5479 Жыл бұрын
I can't wait for them to do supersonic missiles in it lol
@SilverSix
@SilverSix Жыл бұрын
Former 141 crew. The Loadmaster is God in the cargo compartment. He pulls the trigger then its time…
@JohnMastrangelo
@JohnMastrangelo Жыл бұрын
I'm a recently retired aerospace engineer/defence contractor who spent his career working cutting edge shit and I will say this: For every crazy idea that comes to fruition (like this), there are 100 more that some genius/nutcase engineer hatched and spent years working on. God bless America.
@mercwiththemouthsnewphone6798
@mercwiththemouthsnewphone6798 8 ай бұрын
The backlog of psycho ideas the military is potentially interested in must be giant
@victorkreig6089
@victorkreig6089 8 ай бұрын
Skunkworks solved every single possible military obstacle from 1940 until the end of human history and 99.999998% of it is locked up and will never see the light of day
@user-wq5bk6iv7u
@user-wq5bk6iv7u 5 ай бұрын
I mean i can only imagine how many ideas were just plain terrible to come to find out its fucking bullet proof and retard proof perfect for our service members. As a marine ejection seat mechanic. Even our pilots figure out how to break shit.
@astartesfanboy5294
@astartesfanboy5294 4 ай бұрын
My conscience and sanity leaving my body as I see the job offer from Lockheed Martin
@deanfowlkes
@deanfowlkes Ай бұрын
It’s not stupid if it works.
@johno1544
@johno1544 Жыл бұрын
What a brilliant concept for a weapon system that can use any of a large number of cargo planes without any special modifications. Who ever came up with this definitely needs a raise.
@shok24199
@shok24199 10 ай бұрын
Whoever came up with this probably makes a mint at Lockheed or Raytheon.
@honorguardsfencingclub7322
@honorguardsfencingclub7322 10 ай бұрын
It was first done by Wile E. Coyote, from a balloon, with a bedsheet full of little winged firecrackers. Yes, the Roadrunner was unharmed.
@nekotrash6580
@nekotrash6580 9 ай бұрын
@@honorguardsfencingclub7322 I read unharmed as unarmed at first and thought Wile E. Coyote was now striking civilian targets.
@matthew1995king
@matthew1995king 8 ай бұрын
​@@shok24199it's just recycling and old capability of the c130 but with modern smart weapons instead of nukes...
@MrSwccguy
@MrSwccguy 7 ай бұрын
Marine enlisted? Lmao yeah right
@Raccoonactual
@Raccoonactual Жыл бұрын
Never thought I'd see the day that a regular C-130 would one up a AC-130. Could you imagine the AAR between the 2 crews? AC-130- " yeah, we leveled a few buildings in such and such town with the 105". C-130 crew- "that's cute, we deleted 45 buildings all over the country in seconds"
@44R0Ndin
@44R0Ndin Жыл бұрын
Seconds nothing, the missiles do take a long time to reach their targets since they're subsonic. But yeah if you planned the flight paths just right, I suppose you could have them all enter their final attack phase at roughly the same time. So overall I guess it depends on what exactly you mean by "in seconds". Is it "time from launch to destruction"? Or is it "time elapsed from first destroyed target to last destroyed target"?
@Raccoonactual
@Raccoonactual Жыл бұрын
@@44R0Ndin figure of speech bud.
@44R0Ndin
@44R0Ndin Жыл бұрын
@@Raccoonactual Oh I know it's a figure of speech, I was just trying to point out that technically you're not using it right.
@itsjustmoney9039
@itsjustmoney9039 Жыл бұрын
@@44R0Ndin I bet you’re lots of fun at parties
@44R0Ndin
@44R0Ndin Жыл бұрын
@@itsjustmoney9039 Who said I had any interest in going to parties in the first place? 🙃
@AircraftSparky
@AircraftSparky Жыл бұрын
Just some corrections: it would be the loadmaster who would deploy Rapid Dragon and a Staff Sergeant (SSgt) in the Air Force is an E-5. However, anyone can become a loadmaster upon initial entry… so an E-3 (A1C) could be responsible for dropping Rapid Dragon out of the cargo plane. So some 18 year old kid straight out of Tech School could be launching his explosive bukkake all over the faces of America’s enemies.
@the_fat_electrician
@the_fat_electrician Жыл бұрын
ya I had army in my head I corrected It in the pinned comment that's my bad
@ReustersPlace
@ReustersPlace Жыл бұрын
I think the explosive Bukkake was the perfect sentence enhancement. Well done!
@jonf9633
@jonf9633 Жыл бұрын
Dude, explosive bukkake isn't a phrase I knew I needed.
@AircraftSparky
@AircraftSparky Жыл бұрын
@@the_fat_electrician oh you’re good, I think there’s a good joke to be had with explosive Bukkake and Loadmaster there though. Love your work man!
@acewing1
@acewing1 Жыл бұрын
Correction: he'd probably be like 19 or 20 by the time he's out of schooling and actually allowed to drop anything out of a plane on his own
@thelonehunter6025
@thelonehunter6025 Жыл бұрын
The scariest part about this weapon system is that those pallets can also be equipped with the new LRASM anti ship stealth missiles we are currently using. In other words assuming all of the missiles hit their target and we were to go to war with China tomorrow 3 C-17s with Rapid Dragon could sink half or more of the entire Chinese Fleet in 24 hours. And if we're just talkin the normal JASSM cruise missile rapid Dragon would be the ultimate method for the US to conduct anti SAM operations since they could deploy their cruise missiles with targeting data to strike enemy SAM batteries from standoff ranges where they wouldn't be able to take out our cargo aircraft. This would allow us the ability to destroy an entire enemy frontline's SAM coverage and essentially give us air superiority on a silver platter allowing us to bombard the front line and clean house with just about any opponent that doesn't have a counter to this weapon system. And to be honest if every single cruise missile only costs a million dollars that is extremely cost-effective if it means we can secure constant air superiority. PS. This also means that once we mass-produce this weapon system will double our bomber Fleet overnight forcing the enemy to have to Target every single aircraft we own not just our bombers. Spreading their Air Force thin.
@anggisuwandi2404
@anggisuwandi2404 7 ай бұрын
Also don't forget after the war is over America gonna have another headache and that was *the Legendary national debt*
@dustinbrueggemann1875
@dustinbrueggemann1875 6 ай бұрын
@@anggisuwandi2404 The bulk of the US national debt is to its own citizenry, and for every dollar we owe somebody, somebody else owes us at least 65 cents. It's a big number, but it's not really that spooky
@doughesson
@doughesson 5 ай бұрын
As if the current National Command Authority has the stones to stand up to his Chinese masters.
@troybaxter
@troybaxter 4 ай бұрын
​@@anggisuwandi2404 That's why we should end the war as quickly as possible.
@corellonable
@corellonable 4 ай бұрын
selling these weapons to Taiwan so they can use their own AA-saturated airspace to delete the Chinese Navy sounds like a fucking bargain im sorry @@anggisuwandi2404
@christianporter3638
@christianporter3638 Жыл бұрын
No lie, this is one of the greatest short form videos I’ve ever seen. Engaging, edited well and most of all witty AF. Excellent
@the_fat_electrician
@the_fat_electrician Жыл бұрын
thank you! I appreciate that
@rideshareog
@rideshareog Жыл бұрын
What Bob said...
@AfricanLionBat
@AfricanLionBat 9 ай бұрын
​@@the_fat_electricianI've loaded this missile onto the F15E and I've seen what this weapon can do. It's one of the smartest weapons I've seen and I was shocked when I heard what it can do. I'll only tell you this, be thankful it's ours and not our enemies because if you make a mistake targeting, it'll call you a fucking idiot and suggest a "change in flight pattern."
@christopherskipp1525
@christopherskipp1525 9 ай бұрын
Witty, depends on what one finds to be witty.
@SegaRihdan
@SegaRihdan Жыл бұрын
This is proof our entire military *gruntwork* system needs a raise, like a big one for doing great work under horrible management.
@the_fat_electrician
@the_fat_electrician Жыл бұрын
fax
@patrickscott1487
@patrickscott1487 Жыл бұрын
@@the_fat_electrician Does management use fax? That might be part of the communication issue.
@argentshrike516
@argentshrike516 Жыл бұрын
@@the_fat_electrician faxing is outdated
@ayaxmcgill635
@ayaxmcgill635 Жыл бұрын
My brother in Christ, 800 BILLION DOLLARS
@thehellsage
@thehellsage Жыл бұрын
@@ayaxmcgill635 I think he means the actual front-liners, like that E-6 crew chief.
@Lomion
@Lomion Жыл бұрын
C-130 to AC-130: "Imagine having to get close to your target."
@jakestaples93
@jakestaples93 Жыл бұрын
Funny that the ac130 still has the loading door and room for a pallet or two. Usually extra ammo but who knows now....😉
@kerbalairforce8802
@kerbalairforce8802 Жыл бұрын
@@jakestaples93 Modern AC-130Js can carry 10 griffin missiles, and 8 laser guided bombs, or 8 Hellfire missiles, or 4 of both.
@Kevin-fj5oe
@Kevin-fj5oe Жыл бұрын
​@Kerbal AirForce but do they carry 45 cruise missile?
@Dustin277
@Dustin277 Жыл бұрын
Nerds
@Arcalargo
@Arcalargo 16 күн бұрын
6 x 3 = 18 The C-17 can carry 45, not the C-130
@stevengrindle5336
@stevengrindle5336 8 ай бұрын
Crew Chief is the ground mechanic. Load Master (yes that is really their title) would be the one who sets up the parachute to deploy in flight. They also push the button on the panel once the pilot says green light. In the Air Force E-6 is a Technical Sgt and E-5 is a Staff Sgt. Last thing, a large majority of the Load Masters that work these planes are E-4 and below.
@jamesbell6978
@jamesbell6978 8 ай бұрын
Agreed. I used to be a C-5 loadmaster, but we didn't do airdrop.
@robertalexander5892
@robertalexander5892 5 ай бұрын
It figures that the E-4 Mafia would have their fingers/hands in here somewhere.
@richardbossman9875
@richardbossman9875 11 ай бұрын
I think equally as dangerous is the fact that not only can simple cargo planes act as launching platforms for these middles but there is nothing saying a C17 couldn’t drop a few pallets of the off to soften a target and when it gets a wee bit closer drop a battalion of Rangers to mop up what’s left.
@patrickoviatt2432
@patrickoviatt2432 8 ай бұрын
Another amazing American "Door Knocker"
@williamcastillo2312
@williamcastillo2312 Жыл бұрын
The Power washing business needs its own video.
@the_fat_electrician
@the_fat_electrician Жыл бұрын
😄 🤣
@joeojeda4651
@joeojeda4651 Жыл бұрын
Yesssss please 😂
@miguelmederos8634
@miguelmederos8634 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely!
@mobilemechanic7700
@mobilemechanic7700 Жыл бұрын
BRUH, so much yes!!!
@davidthorp01
@davidthorp01 Жыл бұрын
To be fair, we need to do a video on Napalm or all manner of incendiary hell spawn.
@willb5278
@willb5278 Жыл бұрын
Ever considered doing an episode on Skunkworks? 'Its not a War Crime the First Time' is essentially their motto.
@the_fat_electrician
@the_fat_electrician Жыл бұрын
I'm sure I will at some point
@spartanonxy
@spartanonxy Жыл бұрын
I think their motto is more "Its not a warcrime if no one knew it happened".
@windwalker5765
@windwalker5765 Жыл бұрын
"Planes so crazy people think we're aliens."
@tringalij
@tringalij Жыл бұрын
Sweet man. I was working on this back in the day for C-17s. But some fixes for ya, no, that’s not a crew chief that’s a loadmaster and guess what the median rank for an airdrop loadmaster is? Senior Airman. But don’t worry, the C-17 does that drop itself when it’s set for auto, or the copilot does it in manual (pilot monitoring technically). Good stuff man. I did airdrop testing for S/LRALT back in 04 ish launching the top of a Minuteman II ICBM from 25,000 feet as a test.
@jimbobsmith2496
@jimbobsmith2496 Жыл бұрын
I wanted to say the same, that and a E6 is a Tech Sargent
@MCSgt117
@MCSgt117 11 ай бұрын
Hey Man, I remember those shots posted in the unit of the ICBM being airdropped. This seems like it would be a more common tactic considering the frequency we use ICBMs.
@soda366
@soda366 Жыл бұрын
This gives a whole new perspective to the 20+ C-17s that fly over charleston sc harbor as a demonstration/training every few years. charleston AFB has absolutely zero issue putting every C-17 they have in the air within minutes
@scythelord
@scythelord Жыл бұрын
It's getting even better. The AGM-158B-2 variant, also known as the JASSM:XR, has an increased range of 1200 miles. The unit cost increased to 1.5 million per missile but can put warheads on foreheads from over twice as far away. The military will take delivery of the improved missiles next year.
@MisterW0lfe
@MisterW0lfe Жыл бұрын
that's out of a bomber, where you already have forward momentum. These will be deployed falling more or less straight down from parachuted silo packs. so you lose some range, halving the "official" range of the munition (since we both know the actual range is much longer than listed publicly) is a reasonable expectation.
@scythelord
@scythelord Жыл бұрын
@@MisterW0lfe No, the AGM-158B-2 is compatible with Rapid Dragon and will be deployed in such systems. Rapid Dragon fires the AGM-158B. AGM-158B-2 is the second range extending upgrade to the AGM-158 missile family. The missile itself has a 1200 mile range. Forward momentum has nothing to do with it.
@sparrow9990
@sparrow9990 Жыл бұрын
Imagine the c5 with 190 of these. U could litterly destroy the entire Chinese airforce and army with 1 load if they didnt shoot like half of em down so we could litterly destroy the shit out of china by shooting their airfields and bases n shit with these. I'd get like 5 c5s like right now if I had the chance and just destroy the entire Chinese military with em then just do a land invasion. War won with very minimal friendly losses
@chriswhite3692
@chriswhite3692 Жыл бұрын
@@MisterW0lfe Lol what? The speed of the bomber is going to be so much more than the speed of a cargo plane that it's going to hurl a cruise missile an extra 600 miles by forward momentum/inertia? B1 speed: 950mph C17 speed: 590 mph
@tenchraven
@tenchraven Жыл бұрын
@@chriswhite3692 You have a point, but you miss one- the pallatized launch system of Rapid Dragon is effectively nill at firing. But the speed of the platform is a minor variable, altitude is much more important. THAT is why bombers have better range, the JASSM has more time to fall once it's ballistic.
@MrWWIIBuff
@MrWWIIBuff Жыл бұрын
This also plays off of target prioritization of the other side. If you have a limited amount of SAM missiles, are you going to target bombers, fighters, attack aircraft or cargo planes? Normally you'd prioritize the ones known for bad guy to bologna mist technology, not the one bringing MRE's to Forces. This means they second guess every thing the shoot at.
@Cannon2541
@Cannon2541 Жыл бұрын
I mean, you'll be guessing which second you die, I suppose
@bohba13
@bohba13 Жыл бұрын
@@StefanHundhammer oh yeah, this is full scale rapid saturation of enemy air defence. this is meant to be used in the opening days of a war desert storm style.
@taemien9219
@taemien9219 Жыл бұрын
If the enemy blows up the ride carrying chili-mac MREs, there's going to be hell on earth, I guarantee that.
@blackmoon8459
@blackmoon8459 Жыл бұрын
@@StefanHundhammer no, it’s more about which targets the bad guys go after first. Prior to this, the bad guys would target something like a bomber first, to eliminate some of that retaliation ability. Now though, when a cargo plane can launch a retaliatory strike, you either have to open yourself up to higher risk, or devote more resources to taking out airfields. But wait, the C-130 can operate from unimproved fields, aka dirt roads that are wide enough.
@stevenjones6744
@stevenjones6744 Жыл бұрын
@@taemien9219 because I'd be hungry. And chef boyardee only lasts so long. 😂
@MM22966
@MM22966 8 ай бұрын
Ironically, this idea was put forth in a science-fiction novel over thirty years ago; The Prince of Sparta by Jerry Pournelle and SM Stirling. (Falkenberg's Legion). The missile was called Thor, and they described it as "rolling missiles" (off the ramp). Terminal guidance was supplied by special forces teams.
@Sorain1
@Sorain1 3 ай бұрын
I have to admit, the Military-Industrial Complex's continued "So this sci-fi story had this fun idea-" leading to real systems remains one of the most smiling inducing things in the world for me.
@MM22966
@MM22966 3 ай бұрын
@@Sorain1 I want a light saber.
@Techno_Idioto
@Techno_Idioto 14 күн бұрын
@@MM22966 Wait a few years, the U.S MIC will figure it out somehow.
@MM22966
@MM22966 14 күн бұрын
@@Techno_Idioto There was this one in Britain, a hobbyist, but his version had a cord attached. Major bummer.
@Brainchild110
@Brainchild110 8 ай бұрын
In 2022 the newest JAASM, designated "XR", started production. It's range is +1000 miles. Daaayum!
@Shadow952013
@Shadow952013 Жыл бұрын
The Oprah of missle delivery systems "YOU GET A MISSILE! YOU GET A MISSILE! YOU GET A MISSILE! EVERYONE GETS A MISSILE!!!"
@denniscale1538
@denniscale1538 Жыл бұрын
Oprah would have to talk about it and make it a 3 part series!
@Lemongruntplace
@Lemongruntplace Жыл бұрын
Despite that I am your Russian subscriber, Fat Electrician, i must admit that Uncle Sam’s Arsenal of Democracy capabilities always blowing up my mind God bless you all, who watch this channel,in hope to learn something new about Uncle Sam’s Freedom Delivery Service
@gsellis
@gsellis 2 ай бұрын
David Weber must deserve credit for this. In the Honorverse, the pod launching ships were a turning point. I am sure someone read his books.
@gamersoaisis3147
@gamersoaisis3147 11 ай бұрын
The JASSAM-XR has about a 1000 mile range. This thing can hit you from a country and a half over. You would never know that a cargo aircraft deployed that missile.
@chriswithrow3107
@chriswithrow3107 Жыл бұрын
"Drop shipping freedom!" 🇺🇲
@ilesbird
@ilesbird Жыл бұрын
Forklift Certified = Armament Specialist, Crew Chief = Lead Bombardier, Cargo Pilot = Freedom Delivery Officer
@Schnozwangler
@Schnozwangler Жыл бұрын
Hey now, just because you can drive a jammer doesn’t mean you’re forklift certified😄
@masterpooshi6031
@masterpooshi6031 Жыл бұрын
Freedom???
@theangryotaku3361
@theangryotaku3361 Жыл бұрын
@@masterpooshi6031 free from this plane of existance
@Er19421
@Er19421 7 ай бұрын
The Air Force has also begun a technology feasibility study on blended wing tanker and cargo aircraft, a body plan that is both capable of multiplying the cargo capacity and weight limits of these planes by using lifting bodies, but also one that can be optimized for stealth. So… I guess we can probably expect rapid dragon systems to extend their service life far into the future even as anti-air defenses become more advanced.
@ianshaver8954
@ianshaver8954 Жыл бұрын
As far as I’ve seen, the Achilles heel of stealth aircraft so far seems to be payload. If you look at the F-35 or B-23, they don’t carry that much stuff compared to pre-stealth generations. In an air war, the difficult first step is establishing air dominance, which requires you to eliminate enemy anti air and aircraft. I think we’ll end up pairing cargo aircraft with this system with the extremely stealthy sensor platform that is the F-35 to end enemy integrated air defenses.
@arkhaan7066
@arkhaan7066 Жыл бұрын
While that is true, look at the f-22 vs the f-15 trials.
@senseisecurityschool9337
@senseisecurityschool9337 9 ай бұрын
​@@arkhaan7066You mean the ones where they locked the F-22's targeting system to only be able to fire straight ahead (it can normally fire any direction), put in last-gen avionics, then had it *dog fight* unrestricted F-15s?
@senseisecurityschool9337
@senseisecurityschool9337 9 ай бұрын
It was like saying "army sniper vs Hollywood actor", then you take away the sniper'a gun, blindfold him, and have him arm wrestle Jason Mamoa.
@arkhaan7066
@arkhaan7066 9 ай бұрын
@@senseisecurityschool9337 except that none of that happened, the f-22 was left capable, and it won handedly which was my point. The entire point I was making was that while they have less of a payload, the stealth lets them maximize that payload and win against more heavily armed targets.
@senseisecurityschool9337
@senseisecurityschool9337 9 ай бұрын
@@arkhaan7066 Sounds like you're talking about a different test than I was thinking of.
@kaneo1
@kaneo1 Жыл бұрын
Not just cargo planes: every Osprey/VTOL, every heavy-lift copter, anything that can lift the pallet is now a mobile cruise missle silo. 🤩
@lgmmrm
@lgmmrm 10 ай бұрын
"Oh, it's just a King Stall- OH MY GOD IT'S A KING STALLION."
@thomasschulz2167
@thomasschulz2167 10 ай бұрын
Just need to modify a 747 with a rear facing cargo door. Bring a whole new level to the term "Saturation Bombing". One 747 would have more fire power than most countries...
@MrJakeros
@MrJakeros 9 ай бұрын
@@thomasschulz2167 Let me put my stupid cap on for a sec. Aren't military cargo planes bigger than commercial airliners? Please correct me if I'm mistaken.
@alexreitler
@alexreitler 9 ай бұрын
​@@MrJakeros after some googling, I found these numbers for cargo capacity of some military and civilian planes: C-130 H: 19 tonnes B52: 28 tonnes 747: 128 tonnes A380: 150 tonnes (Note: few civilian airliners have rear loading doors, so dropping bombs like in the video might not be possible) Also RIP An-225
@cane6074
@cane6074 9 ай бұрын
Think of the sheer volume of cruise missile those things could fire such a short amount of time! All they have to do is just deploy the missles, land or hover off the ground, ground crews just attaché the pellets to the chopper, and begin the process all over again. Just imagine amount of damage a flight of heavy lifters could do. They could be used almost anywhere, which would make detecting them much more difficult! This could also allow it to to be done at a relativity close but safe distance from the frontline, allowing the missles to go much further into enemy territory!
@John_Conner222
@John_Conner222 Жыл бұрын
3:37 can you imagine you are outside on the farm in the mountains sipping, your coffee, admiring your work while taking a break, then all of a sudden a massive piece of steel scaffolding just smashes either into your tractor, house, truck, or even you, from out of nowhere.
@jeffjahns1974
@jeffjahns1974 Жыл бұрын
Thats what I came here to say. Can you imagine the damage in a metropolitan area from just the shipping pallets of 45 of those things falling from 20k feet?!?!
@jackhunington4340
@jackhunington4340 Жыл бұрын
Well I'd assume you could drop it in an area without and buildings or people considering the 600 mile range, you could also drop them over the ocean and the go recover the scaffolding
@Hawkertempest1
@Hawkertempest1 Жыл бұрын
It's called collateral damage.....get over it.
@jeffcauhape6880
@jeffcauhape6880 11 ай бұрын
And just to be real dicks about it, we should stencil on the pallet: "Please recycle responsibly"
@Aredel
@Aredel 10 ай бұрын
That’s why they have the parachute
@mikem9331
@mikem9331 Жыл бұрын
I'm imagining a 3 ship cell of C5's max loaded with Imagine Dragon's. 500 miles off the coast and lobbing hundreds of missiles at once about 700 miles into the target state. All the while protected by AWACS and invisible F22s. It's a nightmare for our adversaries. Literally unstoppable devastation.
@CorePathway
@CorePathway 8 ай бұрын
This is why I don’t buy the “China is taking over” bullshit. They have ZERO capability to project power or stay afloat anywhere we don’t want them to be. And even less than zero capability to conduct expeditionary land warfare. “They just launched another cruiser”. Well we just built 200 more cruise missiles, capable of conducting a coordinated simultaneous attack, thus overwhelming any defense system. Of course they likely have similar capabilities. The future does NOT belong to big ass aircraft carriers, but to mothership drones carrying strike drones. Yikes.
@attilaabonyi8879
@attilaabonyi8879 6 ай бұрын
Russia and it's allies:" nooo you can't just lobb missiles out of a cargo plane, pls stooop!" Nato:"hehe cargo plane go brrrrrrrr"
@MrScrofulous
@MrScrofulous 4 ай бұрын
But, but, but, China has water missiles, so America loses :))))))))))))
@jamesmartin5220
@jamesmartin5220 Жыл бұрын
Just an interesting bit of history; Back in the 70's, after Carter canceled the original B-1A program, the Air Force decided to see if it was possible to launch an ICBM from a C-5. Similar sort of concept to the Rapid Dragon. It was tested and yes.... it did work. But the program was stopped after common sense broke out.
@killman369547
@killman369547 9 ай бұрын
Can you imagine if a plane went down with one of those missiles onboard. The nuke may not go off but there's still going to be one hell of a conventional explosion. Oh and they were thinking of building a sled/missile carriage that could hold either 2 or 3 of them before the plug got pulled.
@brentranke7528
@brentranke7528 8 ай бұрын
I believe testing was approved as a bargaining chip to get the Russians to sign one of the arms treaties.
@jakobgrayson1039
@jakobgrayson1039 Жыл бұрын
"We will now be deploying cruise missiles by the pallet" *Happy POG noises*
@the_fat_electrician
@the_fat_electrician Жыл бұрын
😄 🤣
@jakobgrayson1039
@jakobgrayson1039 Жыл бұрын
@@the_fat_electrician I heard they were gonna use 3x3 tubes of DIs instead of missiles but Geneva considered it "cruel and unusual punishment....for the enemy'
@vitamink2211
@vitamink2211 Жыл бұрын
Happy grunt noises too
@xscaliersolid1194
@xscaliersolid1194 Жыл бұрын
@@jakobgrayson1039 OK, hear me out - we put the DIs INSIDE the missiles, and we deprive them of their coffee.
@arnoldsherrill2585
@arnoldsherrill2585 Жыл бұрын
Can you imagine going to your local Air Force recruiting station, a few years down the road, and they add this to part of the job description for for loadmaster, and someone actually uses a piece of the fat electrician's video, as part of the explanation of what some of the jobs a loadmaster can do!?
@MinnesotaCouchpotato
@MinnesotaCouchpotato Жыл бұрын
This reminds me of the Honor Harrington series. They had ships designed to carry numerous disposable pods full of missiles. The intent was to create a broadside containing enough missiles to overwhelm the target's electronic countermeasures and point defense. I love it when sci-fi becomes reality.
@tenchraven
@tenchraven Жыл бұрын
When this concept was proposed in the 70s it was considered to sci-fi so it was shelved. Then the guidance capabilities caught up.
@mmasque2052
@mmasque2052 Жыл бұрын
That makes C-17s the first podnaughts?
@panachevitz
@panachevitz Жыл бұрын
@@mmasque2052 Actually........yes! I mean, technically it would be the equivalent of the Q-ship that she commands in Silesia, but yes.
@HeroicCid
@HeroicCid Жыл бұрын
Thumbs up just for the Honor Harrington call back.
@TheRenegadeMarine
@TheRenegadeMarine Жыл бұрын
The good ol DN(P) and then the MSK (at the time) figured out they could basically build a missle revolver with wings and give it stealth tech
@wesidk5662
@wesidk5662 9 ай бұрын
Everyone says America has no anti ship weapons, but the lrasm which is a stealth cruise missle based on the Jassm meant to sink ships. This fits in rapid dragon and the Navy's Mk41 VLS launchers (each destroyer has 96 VLS cells for missles). Meaning that in the past couple years the US went from no modern anti ship missles to being able to sink any fleet in the world without ever having to shoot a gun or fly a plane
@christopher3406
@christopher3406 9 ай бұрын
“It’s never a war crime the first time.“ Loved it. lol. Enjoy your content and energy. Keep it up.
@the_fat_electrician
@the_fat_electrician Жыл бұрын
New Merch in the merch store!: -"BUH" -keyboard warrior - "Only Doors" Benelli m4 -Coffee Mugs -Flags ALSO I made a mistake. E6 in the USAF is Tech Sgt, not Staff Sgt. it's also a load master yeeting the parachute, not the crew chief. I apologize. I had Army stuck in my head filming, apparently.
@havokvladimirovichstalinov
@havokvladimirovichstalinov Жыл бұрын
Still waiting for a Rubber Quackbang
@TheNinjaman97
@TheNinjaman97 Жыл бұрын
Your good. And btw loadmasters can be as low as E3. Now let that sink in
@soonerfrac4611
@soonerfrac4611 Жыл бұрын
My Jeep *definitely* needs a quack bang duck!
@scythelord
@scythelord Жыл бұрын
Also at 2:33 you said "I'm trying to tell you a single C-130 can drop 45 cruise missiles from 600 miles away" when you really should have said C-17, as just a while before you said a C-130 could carry 3 pallets of 6 missiles each (18 total) and the C-17 could carry 5 pallets of 9 missiles each. (45 total)
@connorwalsh7033
@connorwalsh7033 Жыл бұрын
Rubber quack bang mouse
@Chard-O
@Chard-O Жыл бұрын
Wiley E. Coyote would be so proud. These are some serious ACME rockets!!
@katamekothriis1613
@katamekothriis1613 Жыл бұрын
0:53 That cut killed me, absolutely hilarious!!!
@KenKill
@KenKill Жыл бұрын
As an army veteran this is hilarious 🇺🇸 🥂Too the boys in the lab you’ve out done yourselves.
@jonmittlsteadt4297
@jonmittlsteadt4297 Жыл бұрын
I don't know what's more surprising the fact that this exists, or the fact it's not been tried until now 🤣
@the_fat_electrician
@the_fat_electrician Жыл бұрын
exactly my thought
@kbar150
@kbar150 Жыл бұрын
Has not been tried That we know of. .
@Daves_Not_Here_Man_76
@Daves_Not_Here_Man_76 Жыл бұрын
this is just the version that worked
@Mike-ukr
@Mike-ukr Жыл бұрын
The USSR had developed this exact system, but decided it wasn't useful
@mpk6664
@mpk6664 Жыл бұрын
The USSR and the US have done similar things like this, just not with cruise missiles that I know of. Both and MOAB and FOAB can be dropped from cargo planes.
@PhycoKrusk
@PhycoKrusk Жыл бұрын
The only reason this is less terrifying than it could be is that it has a conventional warhead. I bring up now the W89. Never went into production, but it would have weighed 145 kilograms, well within the JASSM's payload limit, and had a yield of 200 kilotons, or about 10 Nagasakis. The C-17 can carry 45 JASSMs in this Rapid Dragon configuration. Have fun with that.
@jlokison
@jlokison Жыл бұрын
The United States has greatly diminished its inventory of nuclear ballistic missiles. Because it makes us look nice, and the older ones are a pain to maintain ready to go. Besides with our new toys we don't need them to wipe someone off the map.
@Kumquat_Lord
@Kumquat_Lord Жыл бұрын
I still think the SLAM is still a bit scarier
@davidthorp01
@davidthorp01 Жыл бұрын
So, let’s play the game; what if they develop something similar for a rainy day and just don’t tell anyone. You put that payload in the Rapid Dragon configuration, and then you play “Where’s the ball” with C-130s all over the tac map so now the enemy has zero clue which one holds a Sunrise Dragon, Normal Dragon, or Uncle Sam’s Undies. Reaaaal fun now.
@jwayneair
@jwayneair Жыл бұрын
A bit of a tangent along the nuke topic, look up W23, the Navy’s 20kt 16” shell for Iowa-class BBs. Only 50 were made. It was derived from the W19, 20kt shell for a special 11” howitzer.
@Troy_Built
@Troy_Built Жыл бұрын
Only capable of conventional. That's what they tell us and they would never lie.
@Urugami45
@Urugami45 Жыл бұрын
This reminds me of a book I read a while back.... It had a thing called a NIRTSat (Need It Right This Second), but instead of cruise missiles, it launched surveillance satellites. Reality is more awesome than fiction, though.
@prjndigo
@prjndigo 3 ай бұрын
I know you LOOOOVE hearing from me. In 1988 NASA played around with huge mylar balloons in Australia. Turns out you can hitch four 158's in a rack under an LDB and let it drift in at 100,000ft from 10 days upwind... and launch maybe 20 of those balloons from a bulk carrier _without anybody ever noticing_ ... lemme know if you need a drywall patch kit. The USS President (1800) had enough room to deploy one of these balloons from between her A and B masts. The USofA can literally deploy stealth cruise missiles by balloon from a sailboat.
@windwalker5765
@windwalker5765 Жыл бұрын
Okay. I'm trying to do the math here. 18x missiles per C-130. 45x per C-17, and an unknown, larger number per C-141 or (dear God) C-5. Between Air Force, Navy, and Marines, we have to have over a thousand cargo planes. That adds up to... all the goddamned missiles getting yeeted at some poor bastards.
@masterpooshi6031
@masterpooshi6031 Жыл бұрын
You must be a boomer. C141 retired 20 years ago.
@windwalker5765
@windwalker5765 Жыл бұрын
​@@masterpooshi6031 Technically I'm Gen X, but I'm old enough... Been going to airshows since I was a little kid in the late 80s. I remember they used to use Starlifters for battalion size paratrooper drops to open the show.
@Maktumekal_Ilzrei
@Maktumekal_Ilzrei Жыл бұрын
Theoretically you could probably throw these out the back of a Chinook or Ch-53 as well. Might be some duckery with the parachute's interractions with the rotorwash, but yeah.
@sharkbowers6035
@sharkbowers6035 Жыл бұрын
As a c17 crew chief im an e3 and the flying guys are usually e4-6 so yeah your not wrong, i automatically love my job more now, i may have the back pain of a 50 year old at 19 but bad guy to bologna mist technology brightens my day
@sharkbowers6035
@sharkbowers6035 Жыл бұрын
As the 50 year old father of the 19 year old c17 crew chief, I am exceedingly proud of the man he's become and the choices he's made. Glad that he's excited and loves the job he's chosen.
@phant0m233
@phant0m233 11 ай бұрын
Crew chief is ground crew. Load master tosses the pallets out the back. The Loadmaster is part of the aircrew, flies with the plane, and is directly responsible for ensuring cargo loads adhere to established standards. Speaking as someone who was once an active duty airman working on ground crew.
@jamesbell6978
@jamesbell6978 8 ай бұрын
Agreed ... I used to be a C-5 loadmaster and C-141 & KC-10 flight engineer.
@F15ElectricEagle
@F15ElectricEagle Жыл бұрын
Rapid Dragon - "Look at me! Look at me! I can launch a bunch of cruise missiles from a cargo plane!" Air Mobile Feasibility Demonstration - "Yawn,... Wake me up when the missile you can launch is a nuclear intercontinental ballistic missile."
@Kcheeseboro
@Kcheeseboro Жыл бұрын
It seems like we are our only competition. Puts a whole new meaning on financial aid 😂😂😂
@the_fat_electrician
@the_fat_electrician Жыл бұрын
indeed
@generalrendar7290
@generalrendar7290 Жыл бұрын
This should also work for deploying decoys with a strike package as well. Increasing the odds of successful strikes on targets and the exposure of enemy defense radars.
@quillo2747
@quillo2747 Жыл бұрын
Just add more $1.5 million missiles, armed decoys are polite decoys
@friendlysnoworb6091
@friendlysnoworb6091 Жыл бұрын
@@quillo2747 exactly, if you add more missiles there's more potential for missiles to hit and do damage
@IsraelMilitaryChannel
@IsraelMilitaryChannel Жыл бұрын
Adding decoys in this case is a waste of space. I would rather have 45 real missiles than 35 real missiles and 10 decoys. 45 real missiles has more chance of hitting. However if it's 10 planes carrying 5 pallets each, and only 1-2 pallet consist of real missiles in each plane and the rest are decoys then it would be really effective saving cost while wasting your enemies air defense missiles. Another way is to send in the first wave of planes to strike with all decoys, second wave decoys too, and third wave with real missiles etc.. this also intentionally waste the enemy's air interceptor missiles.
@Chancellor_dumb
@Chancellor_dumb 9 ай бұрын
Christ that's scary thinking dummies,decoys and live missiles overwhelming the AD mapping it for us to later attack with harm strikes or just more of these and making the strike on target accurately
@nekotrash6580
@nekotrash6580 9 ай бұрын
@@IsraelMilitaryChannel Decoys don't have to be the same size and weight as the real missile so it doesn't have to play out like you suggested.
@crimsionCoder42
@crimsionCoder42 Жыл бұрын
This is literally one of the best most efficient solutions to war I think I have ever seen. The US already has the most advanced logistics network ever cause it’s spent the past 80+ years getting ready to fight on foreign shores. Imagine an opening salvo of tomahawks with refueling craft, cargo planes f35s and escorts. Tankers refuel everyone on approach, cargo drops rapid dragon, as they get to target. Enemy has 2 choices leave radar off and let cruise missiles hit target or turn your radars on and let f-35 direct the LO cruise missiles on your location or launch anti radiation missiles. Brilliant strategy!
@lukkaredwolf3534
@lukkaredwolf3534 5 күн бұрын
What just happened is just too good not to share. I have a specific notification tone for my work email address. While I was listening to this video, just as the cargo plane was opening up the rear hatch and letting the pallet out, my work email tone popped off. Reason why it was so great, is that the notification tone is the following: Starts with the sound of a long snort, followed immediately by someone saying, "God said, he'd teach me karate." Just the right mood for the weapon system.
@KamekazeKuban
@KamekazeKuban Жыл бұрын
The Moab walked so that the Rapid Dragon could run
@scottyV1000
@scottyV1000 Жыл бұрын
We could use the MOABs on whatever was left after the first strike. After that all you’ll have left is powder.
@kevinhyler2474
@kevinhyler2474 Жыл бұрын
What's even more terrifying is most large commercial airliners can be converted to drop these in smaller portions. Just imagine a whole fleet of domestic flights rolling up and yeeting these out the back door.. Puts a whole new perspective on the name Spirit Airlines.
@user-ok9xn5ht5t
@user-ok9xn5ht5t 9 ай бұрын
That spirit airlines ref. at the end def. deserves a like.
@danielstephens7416
@danielstephens7416 9 ай бұрын
Large commercial airliners don't have back doors.
@kevinhyler2474
@kevinhyler2474 9 ай бұрын
@danielstephens7416 hence why I said converted. all american commercial airliners have conversions to be fitted for military application. In the event of a massive scale war It's a fail safe should something happen to our airforce. Commercial airliners can be converted in about a month while something like a new C130 would take months to build.
@user-ok9xn5ht5t
@user-ok9xn5ht5t 9 ай бұрын
@@danielstephens7416 Lmao where does the luggage go then? Sorry I forgot that the airports just mail it.
@danielstephens7416
@danielstephens7416 9 ай бұрын
@@kevinhyler2474 I believe that a commercial freighter could be converted to military use in about a month, maybe they could even convert a few in that time. But there's no way that it would be achievable at a strategic scale.
@Jeff-C-Dallas-Texas
@Jeff-C-Dallas-Texas 23 күн бұрын
Your videos are informative and entertaining thanks Jeff
@SweatyFatGuy
@SweatyFatGuy 6 ай бұрын
Hey fellow rotund guy... That guy is the 'loadmaster' not the crew chief, and E6 in the USAF is Tsgt, SSgt is E5. You can have AMN and A1C primary loadmasters on C130 and C17s, so E2 and E3s do it. So they are shoving several lifetimes of pay out the ramp. I was Air Cargo, which means I was the guy who drove the K-loaders and pushed the pallets, after building the pallets, on to the planes handing off the cargo to the loadmaster. The things I have shoved into the rear of FRED, C17s, and C141s... the horrors... If a C130 holds three of those, then its the longer version like an L100. Up to the H model they only had 5 pallet positions and that looks like its a little bit shorter than a two pallet train. I've been out nearly 20 years, so they probably updated the C130s, which have been around almost as long as the Buff.
@Khaos_Bringer
@Khaos_Bringer Жыл бұрын
Now offering to unalive our enemies through express delivery.
@iameman232
@iameman232 Жыл бұрын
Another example is during the gulf war when coalition warships launched cruise missiles at Baghdad from the coast and they flew all the way there even with the mountains around them and hit their targets without being shot down nor probably recognized
@petertimmins6657
@petertimmins6657 10 ай бұрын
The two points furthest away from each other in Texas are El Paso and Orange. They are 713 miles apart. Growing up in Texas we had to take Texas History in Jr High. When they would teach about this fact they would use what was called the Great Circle Map. It was a map of the US with two circles on it. Each had a 713 mile radius and one was centered on El Paso and the other was on Orange. It showed how so many other places in the US were closer to El Paso or Orange than they were to each other. From El Paso westward it ended well off the California coast. From El Paso you are MUCH closer to Los Angeles than to Orange. That might help picture just how far these cruise missiles can go.
@Quinn_J
@Quinn_J Жыл бұрын
When you said that a C-17 could drop 45 of those missiles at once, I had to pause the video to grin like a maniac and chuckle to my self while I thought about how completely and utterly f**ked NATO's enemies are. Great video man!
@Altoist2000
@Altoist2000 Жыл бұрын
Bad Dragon would have been cooler. Take notes Lockheed
@kaminsod4077
@kaminsod4077 Жыл бұрын
Whoever's on the receiving end is definitely getting fucked regardless.
@the117doctor
@the117doctor Жыл бұрын
... I mean, whatever those cruise missiles lands on will get fucked either way, so...
@BullGator-kd6ge
@BullGator-kd6ge Жыл бұрын
😂 Should I be ashamed that I know exactly what you’re talking about?
@arnoldsherrill2585
@arnoldsherrill2585 Жыл бұрын
Actually the name change fits the concept almost perfectly, gives an a entirely new meaning into the phrase" shove it" , from a weapons delivery perspective
@ReallyTrailerTrashed
@ReallyTrailerTrashed Жыл бұрын
I had to read the title 3 times before I realized it didn't say "New Bad Dragon weapon" lol 😂
@Fastbikkel
@Fastbikkel Жыл бұрын
That was a very energetic presentation. I found it informative and funny. Thanks for sharing.
@the_fat_electrician
@the_fat_electrician Жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@fademusic1980
@fademusic1980 7 ай бұрын
cargo planes also typically have the lowest cost per flight hour. this saves a lot of money when you compare fighter and some bomber flight hour costs. the missiles will always cost that much no matter how they are launched
@Ladco77
@Ladco77 Жыл бұрын
This is the most beautiful thing I've seen in a long time. These might be expensive per missile, but how much does it cost per shot yeeted out of a cargo plane compared to loading it onto a separate bomber and deploying it old school? This might even end up being cheaper overall.
@cordellpatrick9517
@cordellpatrick9517 Жыл бұрын
Especially if you consider the loss potential of any bomber while flying with them
@BU1Lander
@BU1Lander Жыл бұрын
Honestly, from all the cost he (TFE) quoted, these are already relatively inexpensive munitions... Yeah, sure, to the normal, average, everyday person it is expensive as shit, but as modern military munitions go, they really don't cost too much.
@sladeb6036
@sladeb6036 Жыл бұрын
@@BU1Lander to the modern military these are probably free in their mind.
@jarink1
@jarink1 Жыл бұрын
The main problem with schemes like this is that it takes a valuable transport plane away from (arguably more) important logistical duties. The USAF's cargo carrying abilities are already stretched thin.
@hazardousfury
@hazardousfury Жыл бұрын
@@jarink1 these aren't going to be used past the opening move of a war. They're gonna fly a dozen C-130's in front of the main fighting force launch off like 500 of these things seek and destroy style at max standoff and when the air defenses light up to try and knock em out of the sky the forces behind those cargo planes are going to flatten the air defense and roll up like they own the place (Because they do now)
@1stCaptainJozura
@1stCaptainJozura Жыл бұрын
New COD callout. "Enemy C-130 taking off."
@ryimscaith1593
@ryimscaith1593 Жыл бұрын
"It's never a War Crime the First Time." needs to be your next merch, lol nm. Just went to your merch store and it's already there. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@the_fat_electrician
@the_fat_electrician Жыл бұрын
uts the best seller lol
@OR56
@OR56 Жыл бұрын
That is the best thing I have seen all day. And those 4 cities where totally random, how could anyone find a correlation between them and the current state of world affairs?
@KibuFox
@KibuFox Жыл бұрын
The Jasm aren't just low profile... they're stealth.
@brilobox2
@brilobox2 Жыл бұрын
And sea skimming.
@johnmcmanus2447
@johnmcmanus2447 Жыл бұрын
AC-130: I have a howitzer, a 40mm cannon, and a minigun. C-130: That's cute. Hold my beer.
@F15ElectricEagle
@F15ElectricEagle Жыл бұрын
C-5: Hold my nuclear ICBM (look up Air Mobile Feasibility Demonstration)
@MrPingn
@MrPingn 10 ай бұрын
"How many strike aircraft do you plan to have?" USA: "All of them."
@Toole8
@Toole8 Жыл бұрын
That would be a loadmaster that yeets them. In the Air Force crew chiefs are on the ground and flying crew chiefs only repair the aircraft
@sonnygoot20
@sonnygoot20 Жыл бұрын
Great video as usual, just some minor corrections. E6 in the Air Force is called a Technical Sergeant. Crew chiefs are maintainers that fly with the plane incase something breaks during a mission, I belive you meant Loadmasters aka pajama-wearing flight stewardesses. Also, one pallet is rated to hold 10, 365 lbs and a C17 can hold 11 pallets in center line configuration or ADS and in LGS 18...that is a lot of hate that can be shot out the back. Lastly, this airframe can also carry up to 150,000 lbs during wartime and with wavers can carry a lot more. Again, Keep it up the great work!
@DerekAKApillz
@DerekAKApillz Жыл бұрын
At least someone caught that
@Randomnocluedude
@Randomnocluedude Жыл бұрын
Also, Crew Chiefs usually stay on the ground. It’s the Loadmasters that yeet pallets out the back.
@sonnygoot20
@sonnygoot20 Жыл бұрын
@@Randomnocluedudeyour right, but technically loadmaster’s are the ones that babysit the cargo that Port Dawgs load for them.
@zachhoefs9543
@zachhoefs9543 Жыл бұрын
I haven't seen anything about this weapon system talking about this, but it could be that 9 pallets is the current limit of the system.
@toakongu1
@toakongu1 Жыл бұрын
they ain't your run of the mill 4x4 ft pallets either
@filanfyretracker
@filanfyretracker Жыл бұрын
something else to look up which sadly there is not a terrible pile of info on because it never left the concept on paper stage. Boeing once proposed a 747 Cruse Missile carrier, apparently it could carry 72 missiles in the design.
@steeljawX
@steeljawX 4 ай бұрын
WOW! Costco deliveries sure have come a long way! It's one of the most American things ever. It's clearly been bought in bulk if the serving size is measured in "pallets" and no need to get up, we'll bring it to your face for you. What great service.
@bkam9794
@bkam9794 9 ай бұрын
2:28 I'm terrified simply wondering just how many of these we could cram onto a C-5 Galaxy.
@airgunshooterssyndicate103
@airgunshooterssyndicate103 Жыл бұрын
Yes the best on KZfaq made my day thank you
@the_fat_electrician
@the_fat_electrician Жыл бұрын
thank yoy!!
@Kiite702
@Kiite702 Жыл бұрын
Dear Christ it's beautiful 😍
@egregory348
@egregory348 Жыл бұрын
A million a pop isn’t bad if the target is a ship. This would certainly be a game changer in the Taiwan Strait. We need to prioritize production of these ASAP!
@middleman9596
@middleman9596 Жыл бұрын
0:42 well I need a new job then
@crayfish9966
@crayfish9966 Жыл бұрын
"buh, you listed the incorrect aircraft, buh" C-130 (the one you said) - 3 pallets x 6 missiles = 18 C-17 - 5 pallets x 9 missiles = 45 besides all of that, love your work, makes me laugh every time
@KaoretheHalfDemon
@KaoretheHalfDemon Жыл бұрын
Imagine a C-5 Galaxy. My dad was in the airforce and worked on one. He says it would be able to hold 250 missiles.
@arkhaan7066
@arkhaan7066 Жыл бұрын
@@KaoretheHalfDemon Thats 375 million dollars in under a minute.
@F15ElectricEagle
@F15ElectricEagle Жыл бұрын
C-5 Galaxy - 1 nuclear ICBM (look up " Air Mobile Feasibly Demonstration").
@bkbenelli
@bkbenelli 9 ай бұрын
Whew, and here I am watching this a few months after and wondering if nobody else caught that! Solid crayfish.
@michaelyoung7261
@michaelyoung7261 Жыл бұрын
The cost to salary comparison reminded me of the sealant that we use at the water research lab I work at. One sausage tube that fits into the caulk gun cost $15 a pop. We usually get boxes of 20. I make just under $14. We easily use the entire sausage in under a minute when laying down flooring to make the boxes for the dam models we build.
@dadthelad
@dadthelad 6 ай бұрын
I love how your brain works. I already new what Rapid Dragon was, but just had to hear your version.
@joshmccoy1522
@joshmccoy1522 6 ай бұрын
"Just f it, we'll just throw them out the back on the way there." Thanks, man. I just woke up the entire household, including my deaf dog.
@ethanmeatzie6179
@ethanmeatzie6179 Жыл бұрын
Now, see, when you said this was a self contained palletized system, my mind immediately went to the C-5.
@RedRoofGarage
@RedRoofGarage Жыл бұрын
I used to work on C-5 and my thought exactly...A plane that can stuff 6 Greyhound buses inside, the LoadMaster would be having a fun time Yeeting it out not a crew chief...Bah lol
@ferallion3546
@ferallion3546 Жыл бұрын
Modern day C130: "Just like Vietnam!." Fortunate Son playing in the background C130: "You do me proud Grandson!"
@hungriestshark8370
@hungriestshark8370 11 күн бұрын
E-6 in air force is tech sergeant, but just an fyi which may insult enemies more, is that crew cheif is a job, not a title, so an E-1 can be a crew chief, that means that a kid who graduated basic within that year, as long as he's done with on the job training within that year and i don't know how long that is for crew chiefs, could be the one sending those 45 missiles out of the plane.
@lefffbezos4896
@lefffbezos4896 5 ай бұрын
“It’s never a war crime the first time” Thank you for understanding us Canadians
@fuzzyhead878
@fuzzyhead878 Жыл бұрын
This is beautiful. Also do you think you can do a video about the time the Air Force considered making 747s into airborne aircraft carriers?
@baldieman64
@baldieman64 Жыл бұрын
Not to mention the 747 CMCA program.
@fuzzyhead878
@fuzzyhead878 Жыл бұрын
@@baldieman64 Looked that up. That also sound amazing. Now if we could have convinced Europe to do stuff with the A380…
@cjthenarhwalking1378
@cjthenarhwalking1378 Жыл бұрын
If you think the 747 mothership is crazy just look up the Lockheed CL-1201.
@bodin1912
@bodin1912 Жыл бұрын
@@cjthenarhwalking1378 oh %@#$! That plane would be huge. An 1,120 ft wingspan? The wingspan is a Boeing 747-8 is 224 ft 7 inches
@cjthenarhwalking1378
@cjthenarhwalking1378 Жыл бұрын
@@bodin1912 exactly. It was designed just to see how large an aircraft could be.
@jdtheone
@jdtheone Жыл бұрын
Seen this before but your explanations are always better and funnier soooo I prefer yours because they are much easier to understand so thank you and keep up with the great videos 🤣🤣👍
@the_fat_electrician
@the_fat_electrician Жыл бұрын
thank you I'm glad you like um!
@tracywheeler8879
@tracywheeler8879 5 ай бұрын
Great job on the video! I just found you and I am addicted
@bieuxyongson
@bieuxyongson Жыл бұрын
Just another accolade for C-130. I've been retired awhile so these are new to me. Very Kick Butt Awesome. Nice to know we still have a few aces up our sleeves.
@cordellpatrick9517
@cordellpatrick9517 Жыл бұрын
Could you imagine an AC130 with just 1 of these as it's entrance into the battle field
@jakestaples93
@jakestaples93 Жыл бұрын
Yeah I think the AC130 can load a few pallets not as much as a C130 due to the broadside cannons but yeah I think the might be able to tuck one or two pallets at the very back
@kerbalairforce8802
@kerbalairforce8802 Жыл бұрын
AC-130's can't load pallets to drop. The griffin missile rack and pallet mounted 105mm takes up that space.
@jamesj1523
@jamesj1523 Жыл бұрын
First time watching anything from you and was laughing for half of it. Loved the commentary and "random" flight paths. What a great video. Cant wait to watch more.
@badrobot2478
@badrobot2478 Жыл бұрын
@jamesj1523 he has a lot of stuff for you to catch up on,my favourites are the"submarine that sank a train"&"dreadnought gangsta lean".
@ryanlicce7785
@ryanlicce7785 Жыл бұрын
This is an odd comparison but as a Walmart worker it just hits weird that each missile weighs 2200 pounds, that’s near the exact weight of pallets of water, they’re about 2217 pounds if I remember correct, or at least the ones we get the most of are
@Sorain1
@Sorain1 3 ай бұрын
That's like a fact you'd see in a thriller novel. "That's how they snuck the missiles in, the plane's load indicator was 17 pounds too light!"
@ThatOneGuySometime
@ThatOneGuySometime Жыл бұрын
I love this. It’s so brilliantly simple.
@grady1134
@grady1134 Жыл бұрын
This puts a new meaning to the phrase opening up a can of whoop ass. This is a case worth. Great video and keep up with the great content.🍻
@jlokison
@jlokison Жыл бұрын
By the six pack
@arrynyo
@arrynyo Жыл бұрын
"It's never a war crime the first time" never fails to get me to laugh till I cry
@stlchucko
@stlchucko 6 ай бұрын
The ground equivalent is essentially… “Hear me out. Instead of the semi trucks delivering the missiles to the launchers, what if we just yeet them directly out the trailer.” The enemy didn’t even need to sign up for Unhealthcare Prime. It’s a service they get for free.
America's Kamikaze Drone
6:09
The Fat Electrician
Рет қаралды 899 М.
M65 Atomic Cannon: It's Real and Terrifying!
5:04
The Fat Electrician
Рет қаралды 831 М.
NO NO NO YES! (50 MLN SUBSCRIBERS CHALLENGE!) #shorts
00:26
PANDA BOI
Рет қаралды 95 МЛН
F-15 Eagle - The Most Gangster Fighter Jet Of All Time
5:14
The Fat Electrician
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
War Tractor - Don't Mess With Farmers - John Deere A1/A2
3:39
The Fat Electrician
Рет қаралды 628 М.
American KC-135 Pilots Troll Russia
3:26
The Fat Electrician
Рет қаралды 862 М.
Basically A War Crime - America's Future Weapon The XM-29
15:00
The Fat Electrician
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
Corn: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
24:54
LastWeekTonight
Рет қаралды 847 М.
US Navy's Unluckiest Ship With An Untouchable Crew - USS William D. Porter
18:11
The Fat Electrician
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
🇷🇺 Why Russia Worries About Ukraine Getting Taurus Missiles
6:29
Interesting Engineering
Рет қаралды 460 М.
USS No-Go - America's Invincible Concrete "Battleship" - Fort Drum
12:50
The Fat Electrician
Рет қаралды 999 М.
WW2 Veteran vs. HOA - Van T. Barfoot
11:22
The Fat Electrician
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
NO NO NO YES! (50 MLN SUBSCRIBERS CHALLENGE!) #shorts
00:26
PANDA BOI
Рет қаралды 95 МЛН