even with nouns?

На самом деле, разница есть, просто воспринимая это на подсознательном уровне мы её не осознаём, например ты ведь не скажешь, "мне надо телефон" ты скажешь "мне нужен телефон" и тд

@@vrotimnogijenkins7526 Да, Вы правы. Но иностранцам лучше на это не обращать внимание, потому что это действительно мелочь.

@@jonallen7619 he is not realy correct. we can`t use НАДО with some nouns. for example "I need a phone" in russian will be "мне НУЖЕН телефон" But if we translate "I need to buy a phone" it will be zero differences between "надо" and "нужно", both of it will be correct

​@@vrotimnogijenkins7526 Мне надо телефон ok Надо новый телефон ok

Now you do!

@@greatestytcommentator well, you're right)

This kind of comment is amusingly reassuring.

@@adamdavtian8614 No one puts ")" in their sentences so it is the best way to identify Russian

@@prostobiscuit_2836 it's like a smile, why don't others use it?

Я тоже так делаю)

"нам" и plural but "бензин" is not.

@@Rus-eq5wn Exactly, but to a native English speaker... this concept is backward. If I change my example around a little, "he is needing shorts today because of the hot weather", "ему сегодня нужны шорты из-за жаркой погоды". You can see the "is" in the sentence... in English, the "need" follows the subject singular "he" and not the plural object "shorts". And as for the example about needing gas (petrol), "do we need gas?", "нам нужен бензин?", the "we need"... one would assume that "нужен" should be "нужены" because "we" is plural... but this is incorrect. In English, the conjugation follows the subject in terms of gender/plurality. "he needs", "we need"... but in Russian, it's better to read it backward (or, at least backward to an English speaker)... "the shorts are needed to him", "is gasoline needed to us?" Which is why I highlighted that section in the video... this is a great example of "thinking like a Russian", because thinking in English will get you the wrong translation. I kind of wish there were more examples in the video of mixing genders (singular m/f with plural object, or plural subject with m/f objects), because this is an area where English speaker's default mode will produce incorrect sentences.

@@rommster ну да, но в видео обсуждается "надо" и "нужно". моё первоначальное сообщение заключалась скорее в том, что тем, кто не знаком с этими словоми, необходимо нарушать правила английской грамматики. «need» в английском языке - глагол, «нужно» в русском языке - прилагательное, описывает предмет. тем, кто с этим не знаком, возможно, только учится впервые, стоит обратить пристальное внимание на этот момент в видео. думать нужно по-русски, а не пытаться переводить напрямую, потому что слово в слово это просто два разных способа мышления. это может сбить с толку тех, кто только начинает учиться, и эта часть видео очень важна.

The thing here is that "мне" is not a subject, thought it is in the first place in the sentence. It is an object technically. Because it is a form of dative case of "я". Я нуждаюсь в шортах. But this kind of phrase sounds weird to the natives. We use the backward construction with нужно, where the subject is the thing that is needed. so the conjugation follows the subject anyway. it is something similar to the passive voice in English : the house was built by the workers. Here the verb is singular though the "actor", workers - is plural.

Нет, "необходимо" - это вообще из другой оперы

всё из той же оперы, только более категорично@@arxangel07

Вы из России????

@@alefe1237 да я из России. И просто слушаю его английскую речь ведь в обычном разговоре на английском к примеру в VRchat я не особо понимаю людей да и сам говорить не умею

Мне было нужно / мне будет нужно. Just add a form of to be in the tense you want

@@rflr большое спасибо

Most of them are Latin originated.

most of them Russian, I just showed a few for example but there are many many more. English versions are shorter or sometimes some letters in a word lost - for example word KNee - in Russian it's KoLeNe -as you can see in English L is lost between K and N.@@muratcamgoz6674

@@Rus-eq5wn Latine is approximately 2500 years old language and it affected all European languages. While people were speaking in Latin, there was no Russian language. Even 1000 years ago, no Russian language. Your ancestors were speaking in Eastern Slavic. So Such Latin words has been borrowed from Latin across French. It was very interesting to see some main verbs and words from Latin while I was learning Russian . For example, видеть-videre, сидеть -sidere in Latin.

I have a feeling that it is other way around.. Latin was created in opposite to Russian language - to separate countries on west of Europe from Russia (old Rus). Saying that by watching Ukraine - 100 years ago it did not exist, now they have own language made of a Russian dialect, next step will be converting it to latin letters. as it was done in Pole before and other Slavic nations in Europe. So if we would live let's say a 1000 years at least we all would see it clearly. Official history is written by west countries to say opposite so Russia would look like it's younger but it's not. All white people in Europe was same nation - with same language - old Russian, I am saying old Russian as I am learning English and finding it is very bad Russian, i am finding new common words everyday. Latin alphabet consist of 24 letters while old Russian alphabet consist of 49 letters. It's impossible to create alphabet with more letters from smaller number of letter alphabet. But other way around it is very possible. Even current Russian alphabet contains of 33 letters. So all of those vedere, sidere - came from Russian - as in Russian there are many other words exist with such roots: ВИДео, ВИДение, ясноВИДение, предВИДение, приВИДЕние, телеВИДение, ВИД, ВИДно, заВИДно, etc. in English some words with vision and video exist, but vision is already modified from vid. view is also modified from vid etc. but in Russian roots are still non modified and same in all similar words. I know it might sound as fantastic to you, but you have to know both languages yourself to do fair analysis of English and Russian.@@muratcamgoz6674

Not necessary не надо,не нужно. Не должен must not Не следует,не должен don't have to do

Мне тоже 😅😢

Вы из Pоccии?

нет

@@alefe1237 нет, я из Южный Африки 🇿🇦

@@philisiwenojoko9714 Я из Бразилии

Вам повезло родиться в России 😮‍💨😣