💯 You are never going to fool judge Simpson!

A web designer would also be pretty good at doctoring up phony invoices.

​@@heyitsMD*** she's awesome, if you do not believe me just ask her! She has a huge sense-of-entitlement. She's so awesome she totally forgot about a letterhead! For the benefit of this planet I hope she doesn't procreate.

​@@heyitsMD Bingo!!

As someone who works in IT, web designers are not usually the brightest people.

technically i don't think he should be doing that. it's not the role of the court to do independent investigation. dgmw, it worked out here, and it was satisfying to see; but judges make decisions based on what's presented to them in court, not on what they find themselves.

I think it’s different in this case because he has to make a determination regarding if the documents are valid. It’s not like the information was evaluated by a jury and he made a separate determination of the evidence.

a VIRTUAL head massage 😂

​@@stacyc7617So, scratching her head and drinking coffee!😂🤷‍♀️

same reason she said she submitted a reimbursement claim to her insurance. she figured it was worth a shot. it's super easy to draft something on letterhead. it just means slapping a logo and provider contact info on there. i would have formatted it for her for five bucks.

I also doubt the PTSD diagnosis.

Your Honor, I received treatment from thirty different unlicensed TT therapists. So I'm gonna need reimbursement for all those too.

@@cindihowell6672 I stubbed my toe and now I have PTSD every time I walk! Every video you watch people on the cops ask people if they have diagnosis with anything every single person is PTSD and anxiety! And then they all want their vape once you pull up your big girl panties instead and grow that F up!

@@cindihowell6672 I think it was mentioned she went to Great Lakes Psychology Group at least briefly; that agency IS a legit psychology clinic in the Ann Arbor area with verifiable licensed clinicians who could have very well diagnosed her with PTSD. However, given how unreliable this witness clearly is, I would want documentation on any sort of treatment she’s received regarding this case.

Are we talking recent or all the time since he's been on the bench? That would then have to include the time where he tried forcing a DUI be dropped against 1 of his interns only to be investigated and that lead to a suspension of him. Does that sound like a fabulous Judge to you?

@@Crash33333a Don't forget his relatively recent attempt at running his own investigation during a manslaughter case and making rulings based on his own investigation.

​@HostileTakeover2 that one really hit me wrong.

@@Crash33333a Do you have any proof of your claim?

@@morlamwebWhile the description is not entirely accurate, you can do,a quick search of the Judge to read what took place. It as a small blip…

You said the keyword: "fused". The different parts of the cranium only move when the head is passing through the birth canal. Babies, as they grow older, have those different cranial plates fuse together and forming what looks like stitches. I presume in adults or children, short of a craniotomy, trying to "move" these bones could be heavily dangerous if possible.

I was literally thinking something along those lines. I hadn't ever heard of that therapy before, but I'm sitting over here like, "cranial"? That sounds like it is something that would have to be done in person. I was just thinking that the online session was the consultation, but this now seems like all the sessions were online. 😬😬 Yikes.

Like the back quacks.

It's like saying you had an online chiropractic session.

😂right!

because it's her prerogative to see quacks for debunked therapy who put together invoices so that they can try to get paid for their fake services. the judge finding whether or not this is kosher is why they're having this hearing in the first place.

She could always be charged for perjury.

She could have but it's at a judge's discretion and generally it has to be partically egregious to the judge. Also it's such a small infraction that they RARELY and I mean RARELY hold anyone in contempt. I have seen solo many Sovsit (Sovereign citizen) videos where they absolutely SHOULD have been held in contempt but weren't. Hope that helped clear some things.

@@LucasMoore88It doesn’t clear things up at all. What’s the point of swearing them in if there’s no penalty for blatantly lying and knowingly, deliberately creating fraudulent documents to use as proof of something? That should be two charges: contempt for lying under oath and fraud. Doing absolutely nothing about lying turns the whole swearing business into pointless charade.

@@CrankyPantss Because it's a minor offense and again is up to the judge to punish the person. And again THERE IS a penalty it just depends on the judge to utilize it. I almost had it utilized against me and I was the victim in the case. Also fraud makes no sense buddy they aren't defrauding anyone. Calm down.

What a tangled web you weave….

I've never seen anyone ever make that face in the context of anger, or whatever he's feeling in that moment, let alone a judge man. Actually wild.

yeah, as soon as she said the type of fake therapy she was getting (her own attorney was having trouble explaining what it is lmao. i guess if she gets quack therapy, it would be out of character for her to retain a prepared attorney), i knew it was gonna be horseshit.

What is the basis of this case? I couldn’t find it anywhere. 😕

@@bridgetmuehlberger5141 so, if i remember correctly. She was hired by him for graphic design stuff. Soon, they started dating. She accused him of abuse n sex assault (i think it was groping or something) but, he was charged with an assault. (There wasnt evidence of the sex part i think) and, she did a victim impact statement where she said he ruined her life for years. And how her career stalled cuz he wouldnt let her do “big jobs” or graphic design work. I think the best thing to do is trust but verify. She did enuff, to me, to make me question if her version of events is correct.

@@beaker4311 Wowza! 😮 Thanks so much for the details. This was a crazy one. Judge Simpson had his work cut out for him!

The fact that you think that shrink actually exists is what’s wild.

@@christiewright1457nah, they probably exist. they're just practicing a thoroughly debunked "therapy," so they get paid in favors, and then they itemize a garbo invoice to see if they can get some money.

it happens a lot. "doesn't take insurance" just means they won't bill your insurance for you. so you have to pay out of pocket and then submit a claim to your insurance yourself. i don't know enough about the internal billing processes of providers, so i can't say why they would or wouldn't do that; but i've seen both an optometrist and a psychiatrist who took payment from me only, and then i had to submit a claim to my insurance after.

His wisdom probably and possibly comes from outstanding years of knowledge.

@@venericanone Yeah, and this would’ve been pretty easy to check up on!

Thank you for everything you had to go through to help save lives! You have my upmost eespect!!! ❤

Is your experience the only one possible? I have PTSD from disaster response and I regularly see my therapist online. If all my appointment is going to cover is talking, why would I drive myself two towns away to see her when I can see her in my home. Of course the physical appointments, EMDR for me, can't take place online, but to completely dismiss online therapy because you don't use it is ridiculous.

​@wildcat1227 agreed. I've went to therapy online for years and it's been a huge help.

@@wildcat1227 called shenanigans on the defendant, not the practice

I started therapy in 2020 and have always had online sessions. First, because of social distancing, then because I worked full time, went to school and didn't have a car. There is nothing wrong with online therapy as a whole.

That's what out of network means. It's when a provider doesn't accept your insurance plan. If your insurance covers out of network care, you can pay the bill and try to get the insurance company to reimburse you. Most providers will do that work for you because they can charge more to insurance companies they don't have agreements with, but it's not a requirement for coverage.

@@Ryan-The-Grifter Being out of network and not accepting insurance are not the same thing. If the shrink was out of network she’d of said that, but she didn’t. She said “SHE DOESNT ACCEPT INSURANCE” flat out it’s right at 11:30. 2 different things. But thanks for trying to correct my girl Nancy.

@@christiewright1457relax, he wasn't being condescending and he's still not wrong. "not taking insurance" just means they won't submit a claim to your insurance for you. you go to the doctor and pay a copay, that means your doctor is billing your insurance for you, and your insurance came back to them and told them what you need to pay. some providers won't do that: you pay them out of pocket and then it's on you to submit a claim to your insurance and get them reimburse you. the fact that this provider is a quack and the invoices are garbage is unrelated to the insurance issue. she's just not familiar enough with insurance to clarify that to the judge. it would have been a good idea for her attorney to go over how to present this information in court so that confusing bullshit like this doesn't distract the judge. one could even argue that's why she retained an attorney in the first place. but given her track record for choosing which professionals to hire, i would have been surprised to find her attorney was good at her job.

@@Ryan-The-Grifter If I go out of network then I have to pay 50 % In network pays much more/sometimes everything

You can pay the provider and submit the bill yourself to the insurance. They may pay half or they may apply it towards you out of network deductible. The provider is completely hands off in this situation. They won’t apply any in-network discounts. They won’t re-bill the visit if the billing code is “wrong” (happens more frequently than you think.” So yeah, out of network and don’t take insurance are interchangeable

Judge Judy would have!

@onlychas This isn't court TV. He can accept testimony outside of actual court.

Well, have friends talk about divorce proceedings, if your lawyer goes through your claims you must pay them their hourly rate to do that. Most people won't pay for that, and the lawyer will warn them they'd better be right.

It is not her attorney. It is the prosecutor she is the victim in a criminal case however just because the prosecutor brings a motion for restitution doesn't make her her attorney. She is still representing the people.

It's not to settle a debt, and one of the "parties"-crime victim, did in fact get paid.

@@PutinsFriendAlec Restitution is a debt.

@@bobbarclay316 Not until the judge decides it exists.

In this case she gets none of the $800, of the $1400, she gets about $150. The $150 is, at conviction, a debt. Judge dismissed a violation, (I don't know of what), and convicted him on the original charge.

When victim started bs ing 😂

Judge first raises his hands at 4:18.: it didn’t take long.

Around 38:44 where he finds out the bond violation is based on a lie.

@@PutinsFriendAlec thank you

@@oldjohnny9341 👍

You read my mind😊

So many terms are meaningless . Bunch of bull

And it's quackery!

😂👍

Exactly

The women who Work For the prosecutors office haven’t heard the last of this . Lousy work and an embarrassment to the prosecutor’s office .

2 grand isn't that big of a payout. However ... grifters are going to grift.

I missed the old days when feeling bummed was cured with pizza 😂

For what?

@@neergbenna I responded to an older vid. Sorry.

@@neergbenna I responded to the wrong video. My apologies.

If the person you are talking to tells you to stop being a whining lil bish? 😂

Lol 😂

This isn't proof of an alibi.

Evidence??

Wow you'd think that would be in the news.

Rubbish

@@voraciousreader3341a court of his peers looked at the evidence, and ruled against him

You need to fact check. He tried to help an intern who got a drunk driving. She was arressted plead guilty. No bribes, no stepping down. It did go to court, he received 6month suspension. He isn't dirty, wasn't charged with accepting bribes. He is a very good judge who is fair a compassionate. Been watching him for over a year. He mad a bad decision but with good intentions, guess he's human.