Volume and hypervolumes

Take 5 grams of psilocybin and you will see 4D geometry. Or at least slices of it in 3D. I'm not even joking.

*Flips hypertesseract table*

TIME FOR 6D TESTS

Comprehendsble for them I assume, just as if we took a normal geometry test, but their challenge would be the fifth dimension.

Thats called drugs

@@JANFU_Nova hyperdrugs*

I swear to God me and 3 others saw that shit in the sky.... for years been trying to figure out wtf we saw.... can't wait to explain it to them So one night me and my buddy were chilling with 2 females we're driving around and we get to a stop sign. And we look up into the night sky and we see some kind of object up there flying around and hovering it look like it was breathing. And we were kind of mesmerized by it. Then we realize that there was nobody on the street oh, there was no sounds there was no wind there was no cars no traffic no people it was like time had stopped except for us and that thing up there floating. So now I realize it was something from the fourth dimension because that's exactly how it was moving the way this video explains it. And then the thing starts coming towards us. So we panicked and we took off. I remember we traveled for about a block and I can't remember anything past that none of us could

That aint weed you smoking nigga...Weed dont make a nigga trip that hard.

@@felipepreciadojr.7882 can you explain wtf?

thats when the gun is so good that the bullet turns through the 4th dimension

That`s so funny aaaa

I am seriously considering the possibility of reaching some matter out of our 3 dimensional plane and making it be ours.

As you wrote this, I wondered, since the flatlanders can't quickly differentiate between letters just by looking at one edge (similar to how we don't know for sure which shape we're looking at by seeing only one side), do they use Morse code to communicate?

@@ava_niche i think they will be using colors for visualization.

@@user-rs1df5gl7e Try to imagine your ideas on a 3D world. We don't use colours to identify shapes or alphabets.

@@ava_niche they probably use some kind of binary system or use colours

@@ThumbsTup A binary system is essentially Morse code. Two bits (0 and 1 or dot and dash) are used in a pattern to communicate. Also, using colours would be rather inefficient since there's only so many colours but a lot of words.

what if we live in the same universe as 4d'ers and they perceive things much differently from us?

666 Dimensional creatures: *Laughs in deformation*

What if God is from a higher dimension than us and that is how he created everything from our dimension?

@@jhgames5381 yes

@@ravemaster9915 4th dimensional being: -"son, don't bother that nest of humans, they didn't do anything to you."

"YOOOOOOOOO, THAT'S TRIPPY. HEY BUD, WHAT DRUG WAS THIS U PUT ON MAH DRINK? BUD?? WAIT, WHAT DO YOU MEAN THIS IS *REAL* BUD? EY BUD, WTF?"

i felt kida weird to and creeped out

Nero Dino drugs = cheats;)

Super trippy, but thanks to getting my mind blown by this vid, if I ever witnessed something similarly bizarre irl, maybe my memory banks will make the connection and I’ll recognize that it’s a 4d object.

@@viniboi9 i'd hope you wouldn't, because now you know exactly what would be happening. you are witnessing something from a dimension beyond your comprehension, maybe trying to communicate with you. divinity.

U realize what we see is the 2d but we live in 3D

Marcos Rodriguez and 2d creatures live in 2d but see a line segment.

Herculean on your 3d phone (SCREEN also 3d)

Herculean but.. the screeen for real is 3d but very thin. ya ya i kno dat u kno it

screen isn't really 2D but 4D in 2D in VISUALISING is looking VERY strange

it would look crazy to us

@@theaccounter but normal for 4D beings. But how would lets say 1D beings react to like 10D objects?

Kinda like the reality we live in and walk around in?

dmt

it would looks like the whole universe moving across time

Shows 4D on the 3D model editor on the 2D monitor

:mindblown:

Same here lol

@@gdlunar3773 Sometimes I rhink people just dont listen what they are listening to, something that makes no sense. 3D model, the hell? You know that almsot everything in our world is 3D?

@@xXY-FXx ALMOST, so it isnt 2d

When u found the ball glitch

A random 4d ball glitched and started rotating on it's own then got teleported to the third dimension

a 4d cone would be a sphere coming into reality then coming out immediately. and its rotation in 4d would be like a round cube transforming into random shapes

You won't be laughing when random cube that changes colors and shape appears in your room

@@-mikko-1373 bruh

@@-mikko-1373 hahahaha (not irony)

F_x woooosh

Draw a circle around them

This opened my mind

Hold the f*ck up. I literally didn't think of that. the random bits of matter that are always everywhere popping in and out of existence might just be another object colliding with our dimension!

BRUH no, that does make sense. Very interesting theory, though it's probably a cylindrical structure since then it would pop in and out immediately instead of gradually. you can see it's clear cutting at the ends of a 3 dimensional cylinder. Interesting.

Random Chicken wait Strings are long cylinders String theory

@@juanbilbao3848 Well

Don't forget about the guy that makes a 4D shape out of Klein bottles and then everyone is frustrated because 4 dimensions is not enough and they need 5 for the hyper Klein bottle to work.

For the printing part, they would have hyperprinting (4d printing) in addition to both 2d and 3d printing. Hyperholography tech is available. Humans have more complicated body structures but is difficult to imagine in 3d. Buildings look like tesseroids instead of cuboids. In fact any cuboid objects in our 3d world will be tesseroid in 4d world. Windows are cuboid.

I've just sh.t a hyperbrick...

but 2d would be obsolete... it'd be like 1d to us, completely useless for showing any kind of information.

@@TheSuperMARIOnette lol

Cant agree more!

'Enlightened'? Copy and paste of my TOE: The 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe? Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. 14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.

@@charlesbrightman4237 I am not gonna even bother read all that.

@@Lumanova That's okay, it's only meant for intelligent people interested in such things.

you're not the only one

@Jameson Waters You mean we can get to the flat landers?

Its easy, just close your eyes and push on your eyelids

*The scary thought:* Shifting yourself along W-axis isn't the difficult part here. Consider this: To 4D-space standards, our 3D Universe is infinitely thin, lying entirely on W=0 point within this 4D space. I'd be insanely, if not impossibly hard, for a 3D being (like human) to perfectly align themselves with the plane of our Universe: in order to enter our Universe (and appear fully in it). Basically: You'd be forever stranded in the 4D space, always ending up next to the infinitely thin plane of our 3D Universe. For the observers within our 3D Universe, you wouldn't be phasing in and out of our Universe, like these 4D shapes did. You'd instantly flash in and out, much faster than light speed - in fact, nothing could detect you passing by. Remember - you're a 3D being. Your W-length is 0. If you were outside of our 3D Universe, floating right next to its plane within the 4D space, and decided to phase through our Universe, you'd appear inside our 3D Universe for an infinitely small moment, and right after that, you'd find yourself floating on the other side of our Universe's plane, completely missing it, missing stopping at exact W=0, due to inertia of your movement. Once again, stuck in 4D space, floating next to our 3D Universe. What I'm trying to say, after venturing into 4D by moving on the W axis, in order to return safe and sound into our 3D Universe, we'd have to make sure, our W coordinate displacement is equal to 0, with infinite precision. In a way, the fact we can't accidentally shift on W axis is a blessing. We wouldn't know, how to return.

@@_Killkor wow seems you have picture it out on how a "Thing" looks like in 4D world with just a random shapes and colour appearing in a room. I envy you :< i might watch more 4D forum again for more knowledge about 4D space. Higher dimension confuse me, even teaseract(?) 🙁

I must comment that you have underestimated your ability to comprehend.

Honestly same

Your mind is greater than I think

It's blank

@@fetendo8291 No, it vanished into 4D space and you have to wait until a 3D slice of it is seen, that you are asked to solve until you solve the 4D test. The problem: there are infinite 3D slices of said test.

not confusing if you peice together each slice

You know what they say. If it isn't confusing, you don't understand it 😵

It’s not confusing

Internet

0w0

@@emperorpierogi9772 i read it that way at first

@@moosles1357 ?

@@yasyasmarangoz3577 a person wrote OWO

well yeah, since we’re ya know, in the 3rd dimension...

No, imagination does not have a limit, only that you did not have the perception of the 4D.

Bob Joshua Donggon Imagination is limited to what you perceive. Just like how a born-blind person cannot imagine color, we cannot imagine 4D plane.

My imagination and dreams can ascend to the 4th dimension

it's because 4th dimension isn't real

Literally the last 20 minutes of 2001 A Space Odyssey

Giin I have a feeling some of the mushrooms operate in that plane. They might be able to give you a glimpse. 🤷🏼‍♂️

@@AnEchochet bruh

That's sounds like the easiest way to move across the w axis that we all live on, if it exists. I never thought about that but if physics holds the same in all dimensions, that sounds correct. Fuck I want to try it too even tho I know I would likely never find our specific 3rd dimensional plane ever again. Fuck, wait. 4th dimensional space implies the existence of innumerous 3rd dimensional planes all simultaneously next to each other. Grabbing a tesseract would pull you through what you would perceive to be an infinite number of realities. Or some kind of 3D space with something or nothing in it. Or maybe it's all just math being impossible math again.

But that would never happen because when you'd touch the 4D object its impact will only be limited to 3D for 3D objects. Imagine the 2D creature being thrown away by the rapidly expanding circle (the sphere for us). It won't be enough to take him out of the plane as there won't be any force the could be applied to the in the z-axis. Same goes for us, you'd just be thrown away in the same dimensions you are in. I'm sorry to break it to you my friend.

interesting. Ill keep this in mind. Thank you.

Chris Sekely IIRC they form kind of a cross shape, like the square faces of the cube, but at the intersection there are 4 cubes sticking out. The other 4 form the cross' shaft.

Thank you both. I thought this may help the visualization/conceptualization process. It may for some people, but 4D is just hard regardless...

Yah this is what I thought i was going to see in the video which have been used by many professors to explain 3D to 4D changes just as 2D changes to 3D which made it slightly more convoluted because we can after all only see in a 3D plane so its very difficult to visualize that cube intersection as explained by Duck

imagine being insid the box as it fades out of third dimensional space time, your body being crushed/bumped into the fourth dimensional plane

probably yes

Someone is working on a 4d computer game. I think the name is "Miegakure", or something similar. Look it up on youtube.

@@Dirtfire thank you you are truly meta

*_What are you doing here Taiga?_*

@@slolilols Ryūji?!

@@LibraryofAcousticMagic3240○_○

😐😐😐😐

.O.

@@LibraryofAcousticMagic3240I think waves could still go through another spatial dimension as it doesn't have any boundaries to what can come in. (If it really does exist)

vr in a nutshell

Whoa, I think this a little difficult to him to do this.

+Rodrigo Bruno I will keep this in mind. I like this idea and I have some thoughts on how this can be done. Thanks!

Rodrigo Bruno nope your still seeing 3d on this video lol

A 4D Donald Trump. Can you do it? That should be a cinch, right?

We live in 4D, the 4th dimension has perspective, we need 5D stuff

yeeee thanks it helped a lot

Same omg

Same here. I just about understood the 1st part, but this is beyond my tiny brain.

@@dreadhead170 then, rewatch the video till you do. Our minds are capable to understanding complex situations such as these. But its only up to you

Wait what a brain

That's correct - but just remember we have 2 eyes, so there is still some perception of 3D depth there. However it comes more from the difference between the images from each of our eyes rather than a direct observation

Well our depth perception is more of a parlor trick from making 2 2D images into giving it depth. A true 3D viewing eyeball would not only see all angles around a object. But it would see everything in our universe down to the atoms that make it up *Theoretically.* because yo have "depth" in a 4D plane you'll need to be able to see 2 3D slices of a 4D object. But that would require the ability to have a sensory organ that can see all of that without existing in the same space as the object or else the object would be floating in your theoretical 3D viewing eye. But I think there was a video that explains 4D light and Sounds so maybe there is a organism that can pick up on that? Who knows.

@@AlienAnthony I guess it would be like how a 2D flatlander can only "see" a 1D segment of their world at any point in time. However as observers in a 3D World they cannot perceive, we can see all of their world

Precisely

Doggo Armstrong hey, there are fucktards just finding out that the earth is flat on this platform as well. If only you could rank videos as actually educational or not.

That's funny. Hug ur mom!

This video teaches more in 20 minutes than school teaches in years.

@@sallymay3643 There should be a "Scholar KZfaq" or "ED KZfaq" after all we already have a "Music KZfaq" And "KZfaq Kids". The only problem is that it will probably result in political-intellectual policing from the KZfaq staff hypermorons.

ikr: "Pika-chaaa!"

:))

Meme? Dead.

Sphere? Inside out.

Spy_Prototype_96.1.5-B HD this was months ago so I guess he started the meme?

@@defaultyanny861 Its origin started about 2 years ago so it's been quite a while. knowyourmeme.com/memes/trivago-guy

beautiful observation, I thought I was the only person who tried to imagine shapes behind the patterns the aurora made, your comment made me smile and cheered me up. THANK YOU.

Hmmm I’m confused now

3 dimensional slices of a hypercurtain in the sky

but its scientifically proven how they work

@@moosles1357 I know right? I hate when people come away from videos like this and try to explain phenomena which has already been explained.

@Wolfreign Valenford Bahaha. Nice one.

@@DarthTwilight their brains are 1d not 2d

Even 1D doesn't make sense to 0D brains.

And their brain is only 1D. Flat brain is a wrong phrase for them because it can also have complex neuron connections. Flat earthers lack that.

Dealt with a flat-earther about a month ago. After I bombarded him with math and science, he said, "Just cuz I don't understand none of that science stuff don't mean I'm not a genius!" .....No, that's precisely what that means...

*farlands in old versions (before 1.9 i think)

Reno Gregory you are wrong, we live in 4D which add perspective, scientist forget physical items in science of dimensions

Actually you're developing connections between the brain cells. You are waking the inactive cells up.

Yeah, u can. Try some magic mushrooms.

dude, you blew my mind !! thanks for sharing

the NT dinension

Same, but I made it to 15 min lol

Well, the 3D box exists only in one "slice" of the 4D world, Use the flatland analogy for this. In flatland, a box is a square. Say we draw a star inside it. Now the flatlanders outside the box can't see the star. But we can see it, sitting right there inside the box. That's how a 4D being would see "right into" a 3D box.

I suppose a 4D entity's "hyperbox" would be a 5D cube, right? All the same math that this video used to "track stuff" in 4D so it knew what was in our 3D slice could be extended to 5D, and we could draw 3D slices of that, too - it would get even weirder.

Is this what a MRI machine does? Allows us to "see" inside our 3 dimensional bodies.

“If harry potter was in real life

Vedant Desai Films mine too and I’m definitely not going to sleep tonight

Jack Gaul you are correct

Might be. Why not? Assuming there are infinite universes across the 4D space (and higher dimensions, as well), we could only imagine how it would actually go up in the "w" axis, how the outer hyperplanes look like. Our planet Earth may be a slice of higher dimension planet. What if a human being was capable of travelling through "w" axis? Through 4th dimension? How many interesting places could we potentially visit? This topic was discussed so many times, and depicted by number of sci-fi story tellers. By far the best I know, is a little sci-fi story named "Narka", writen by one teacher down in CTU in Prague. It had very cleverly and in very entertaining way depicted (described) how a human being would interact with higher dimension creatures and their worlds. Have you ever imagined a higher dimension plane? I tried so. I was never able to visualise more than 3 dimensions. Human brain is not capable of visualising the higher dimensions, until next generation, new evolution begins. If I take Interstellar, that's quite good example of higher dimension warping of 3D space, depiction of 5D tesseract unfolded through 4th dimension into 3D space. A one cube showing a little room throughout the time line displayed as a dimension, allowing interaction.

I was also thinking that because we cast a shadow of a 2-dimensional person so what if we are the shadow of the 4th dimension and the 4th dimension is a shadow of the fifth dimension and ....... it continues to infinity

fidelity, yes and if these higher dimensions really exist then we probably are.

would that mean we would be able to interact with what was in the screen?

on a 3d screen how is that possibel

@@TheCrimsonDuckTTV maybe holographic images will do. So you cant touch it.

Yes, Assuming 4D KZfaq is even a thing.

Yes, I think so, but it wouldn't be a 3D image similar to our world - it would be a "perspective projection" of 4D into 3D, which I think would be quite different. Just like how our 2D images aren't "slices of our 3D world," but rather are line of sight bits of many different slices.

yes, but it's called youhypertube.

+The Glitchy Hand Imagine playing video games in the 4th dimension

exactly what im thinking

The probability of you being stupid is more likely

To be fair, this is the only scientifically acceptable version of a "god", unless you include simulation theory.

@Drago While current theory suggests a maximum of 11 or so dimensions, as that's the limit of what we can conceive, we could very well be wrong. There might be infinite dimensions, who knows.

@@thetimelords911 God isn't bound by the concept of dimensions he can preceive all existing dimensions at once.

you cant visualize it because its literally impossible as humans

r/boneappletea

Yeah, since you can find a 4d plain in the store around the corner.

SnT im sorry im from switzerland isnt that normal in your country too?!

@@schurch1569 Totally man, I'm from Colombia and they give me a joint with the plain (The joint its a 4d object too).

@@paisita8520 true. I'm from Brazil and I got some mushrooms that allow us to see interdimensional creatures. But we can't move in the W axis, except during the trip... :(