War Thunder - R-27ER was WAY TOO MUCH! The R-27R is AMAZING!

  Рет қаралды 10,930

MatAWG

MatAWG

10 ай бұрын

Talking about how the R-27ER was WAY too much when added due to the problems with the radar on the mig29 initially, and now it became apparent that it is a power creep!
Join our Discord: / discord
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @matawg
Patreon: / matawg
Ajude o canal com o PIX de qualquer valor: matawg@hotmail.com
Donate with Paypal: www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted... My Secondary GTA Channel: / @thatmatt-kq9uu

Пікірлер: 178
@D4nger_CLO5E
@D4nger_CLO5E 10 ай бұрын
The R60M is 100% junk vs 9L, if you take out the 27ER....I want the R73
@ItzCPU_
@ItzCPU_ 4 ай бұрын
You got the r73
@3YearsApart1613
@3YearsApart1613 3 ай бұрын
I disagree. The R60m is superior in a head-on close range. That is how I use those.
@bandit5875
@bandit5875 29 күн бұрын
@@3YearsApart1613I mean yeah if the enemy doesn’t have flares lol
@BulletRain100
@BulletRain100 10 ай бұрын
The key reason why the R-27ER is so OP is because the AIM-7F/M have gotten so much worse. When the R-27ER was first introduced, the main advantage it had was its speed so it would win missile jousts, but planes like the F-14A could win in fights by having more missiles. Beyond the speed the R-27ER and AIM-7F/M behaved similarly and easily smacked planes out of the sky. Now the AIM-7 is much more finicky and dodge-able while the R-27ER is unchanged. The great irony is that the R-27 missiles were extremely unreliable to the point of uselessness in actual combat, but are allowed to behave to their theoretical performance in the way the AIM-7 is not.
@v3es473
@v3es473 10 ай бұрын
RUS mains crying and gaijin being lead and probably owned by russians is probably a big part of it
@stilpa1
@stilpa1 10 ай бұрын
Aim-7 had a less than a 9% chance to hit in real life combat. Meanwhile R-27 has no recorded misses...
@strizldizl3035
@strizldizl3035 10 ай бұрын
@@stilpa1The unreliabilty of the R27 is well documented, on the other hand the later AIM7 models F M and P had a PK over 60% in the Gulf War
@stilpa1
@stilpa1 10 ай бұрын
@@strizldizl3035 sure sure? Any proof of that claim? Surely you are not lying because you are trying tocope with the fact you are getting trashed in WT or simply because R-27 is superior to any Aim-7, as proven in Vietnam and every other war.
@strizldizl3035
@strizldizl3035 10 ай бұрын
@@stilpa1 lol, you getting a bit confrontational. Look at the Gulf War Statistics, you do know what the 1991 Gulf War is right? Hit rate of 68% and kill rate of 60%. Sure in Vietnam the kill rate was pretty bad at 10% but it was literally a first generation missile by then in the 60s, the soviets didnt really have that good of an equivalent at the same time, the development of the r23 just started by then. Meanwhile there aren't nearly any reports on kill rates of the R27 (hmmmm i wonder why), but actually during the 1999 war between Eritrea and Ethiopia 24 R27s where fired and only one hit the target, one R27 damaged a B52 in the Gulf war and during that conflict only 1 more F18 was shot down in an air to air engagement (but not due to an R27) even though Iraq operated these missiles so yeah...
@tas_bot4798
@tas_bot4798 10 ай бұрын
"Nations that dont have the ER suffer", then i have a counter point: What about the nations that dont have AAMs at 8.0+, Radar missiles at 10.0+ and mostly any competetive planes like the Mig-29, F-16 or F-14? Top tier air has always been dominated by the nation that gets advanced tech first. First it was missiles in general, then the F-4 dominated for years with F-14 soon to follow. The ER is just one transitional tip of the spear until Gaijin eventually adds the next advancement like MRAAMs and then the ER wont even be a topic anymore. Another point, the ER is not the same as the sparrow but nerfing the missile down to be almost identical is not the answer. Nerfing it down to match all others in its category completely ignores the rest of the plane carrying it. The Mig-29 for example only has R-60Ms as seconday wich are significantly worse than the Aim9-Ls and Python-3s, so should these two also be removed becuase they outperform this one example?
@narcissus5970
@narcissus5970 10 ай бұрын
For your information, when the F14 came out, Mig23s like the MLA and the MLD could easily take it down in a dogfight just by doing vertical turns, the lack of power on the F14A engines caused it. Also it would be easier to just delete the R27ER since there is no missile that has comparable performance in terms of speed, specially acceleration, and most importantly, range. And I know that the Aim54 has great range, but its tracking is dogshit, or just below average, also its slow as hell. The only solution would be deleting the R27ER or giving every other nation something comparable to it.
@John-Johnsonreal
@John-Johnsonreal 10 ай бұрын
@@narcissus5970”I’m too retarded to fly low to the ground so I keep dying to radar missiles” you, probably
@narcissus5970
@narcissus5970 10 ай бұрын
@@John-Johnsonreal I fly low you smartass. But there is no way you can stay low 100% of the times. Besides Im only talking about missile performance, not situations or circunstances. Learn how to read.
@bwhittv1446
@bwhittv1446 10 ай бұрын
IMHO just add things. Allows more vehicles and more weaponry to be added to the game and for playing since 2016, it gets boring when there’s not enough content. Sure it sucks when more top tier stuff gets added so it’ll take a little longer for those who don’t already have top tier but it gets boring. Feel the game would be great with F-15 and Su-27 in the game as other nations will have better aircraft like Sweden with Grippen, China getting more than just a Taiwanese F-16, etc.
@DeathGodArgon
@DeathGodArgon 10 ай бұрын
Yeah, I'm fine with more moddern fox 2s and early fox 3s being added soon, the er may be good but it's still a fox 1
@jesterthelegend926
@jesterthelegend926 10 ай бұрын
I fly the yak 141 a bunch and there had been times I thought I was using the 27er's but was actually using the r27r and I was shocked at some of the kills I would get. Still an incredible missile.
@John-Johnsonreal
@John-Johnsonreal 10 ай бұрын
yesh er is better like 5km, r is better in headons because it isnt as fast so it has more time to turn
@cowboyforadalei4415
@cowboyforadalei4415 10 ай бұрын
the phoenix have a differential that the r-27ER doesn't have: 1. is a active radar missile, in a bvr fight you can escape from the missile's trajectory by just going away, and the phoenix do it all while a mig-29 or yak try to maintain the while a phoenix goes to it, fire and forget advantage. 2.the aim-54 don't advise on rwr, even if you nocth, the r-27 can be notchable too, but the Phoenix is going to trajectory to hit, and the r-27 will lose guidance, furthermore the people don't pain attention to the smoke over 40km away if it are a plane or a missile, the mig-29 and yak players pain more attetion in attack in bvr and dont see what will come to then in the end, the ER can be the best sarh in the game but have the same issues that a normal regular sarh
@tensor8804
@tensor8804 10 ай бұрын
Exactly! And the phoenix is the best fox 3 in the game, simply because there is no alternatives. Glad that at least someone understand this
@cowboyforadalei4415
@cowboyforadalei4415 10 ай бұрын
@@tensor8804 the r27er there is no doubt, is a monster at 20km, but if the guy know how evade and have the aim-7f/m, but the mig guy do, depends how well the pilot, depends of the tatics
@marlonthebro5521
@marlonthebro5521 10 ай бұрын
R27ET would be amazing super long range heat seeker would be cool
@meatbutter3510
@meatbutter3510 10 ай бұрын
would be too OP rn
@wg4112
@wg4112 7 ай бұрын
@@meatbutter3510 well well well
@tyrionlannister1628
@tyrionlannister1628 7 ай бұрын
Agreed 100% just needed to watch this video to confirm my gut feelings after going from the R’s to the ER’s.
@Null24
@Null24 10 ай бұрын
Imo the r27er is fine only because the Americans get the F14B and F16, which compliment eachother perfectly. The tomcats can lock down HUGE swaths of the map, and the f16s can go in and cleanup, whereas the mig29 is on its own.
@dontworry2379
@dontworry2379 10 ай бұрын
it’s on its own because it’s quite literally the best jet in the game
@Null24
@Null24 10 ай бұрын
@@dontworry2379 best jet in the game yes, but I still think its the best only for 1v1 In the environment of Air RB I think the f16/f14 are better suited because they compliment eachother Also not to mention that the R60M is a pretty eh missile especially compared to the 9L
@triparadox.c
@triparadox.c 10 ай бұрын
​@@Null24The thing is most matches are mixed battles, so mig 29 players will still have F16 and at 14 players on the same team
@masau8672
@masau8672 10 ай бұрын
@@Null24 Just the other day I saw a F-14 spamming Aim54's, blocking a lot of my team from going high, so I still belive the ER is balanced in the game.
@saturnascension
@saturnascension 10 ай бұрын
Yak141 doesn't exist lmao
@collander7766
@collander7766 10 ай бұрын
AIM-7P would have datalink and I believe INS as well, so it would act like an R-27 and not explode right away, and also loft in TWS/IRST track. Super 530D should also have the same thing iirc
@v3es473
@v3es473 10 ай бұрын
All of us know though they won't add the 7P or make the 530D proper as is because then rus mains would cry. As is the R-27R/ER should be completely goddamn useless (they are IRL except for the T and ET variants, something was just horribly fucked with the radar seekers), the 530D should and did loft and did have INS (no datalink though) So most rus mains would mald their dicks off if the AIM-7P and proper capabilities of the super 530D were introduced because they would suddenly face a missile that can compete with them, call them broken etc. And if you take away their ERs they will mald even harder, because the R-27R is slightly worse in energy and range. That would be their crying point despite the fact that the current 7s and 530s have no INS/Datalink which the 27R does have.
@vascoiraola5209
@vascoiraola5209 10 ай бұрын
i main russia but would love to face aim7p. couse i have usa too.
@user45g-4c5rf
@user45g-4c5rf 10 ай бұрын
And if there was only that for the 530D... It is announced at Mach 5 as in real life but clearly it is far from it, it loses its energy much too quickly in WT. Even pulling it from very high at Mach 1.40, it barely manages to hit a plane lower than it at 25km away because it loses so much energy that the opponent has no trouble dodging it without forcing... I'm even talking about bugs where it goes at 90 degrees towards the ground while the radar is well attached to the hunter coming from opposite.😩 Recall that in real life the 530D has a claimed maximum intercept altitude of 24,400 m (80,100 ft), with an engagement capability of 12,200 m (40,000 ft) and an engagement capability toward targets at 60 m (200 ft). The missile has a range of 40 km and a maximum speed of Mach 5. Even the Mig23's R24s are better at hitting targets that are skimming the ground or trying to dodge.😒
@collander7766
@collander7766 10 ай бұрын
@@user45g-4c5rf yeah the R-24R is unironically a better missile for 90% of scenarios. It’s actually ridiculous how quickly the Super 530D starts losing speed after the motor burns out. When you compare it to the R-27, which just glides basically endlessly compared to the 530. It’s just sad, especially considering it was considered better than the AIM-7M
@oelholm
@oelholm 10 ай бұрын
@@v3es473 thing is that russia still faces russia basically every game anyways....
@pjbunnyru
@pjbunnyru 10 ай бұрын
сами переведёте- когда не будет подсветка ракет в боях, тогда даже самые простые ракеты будут смертельными. а сейчас кругом аркада, кроме сим битв. и чем больше вы жалуетесь, тем сильней нерфят старое вооружение, и накручивают новое. но, игрокам это не понять.
@fingerzinger5799
@fingerzinger5799 10 ай бұрын
Very factual
@pjbunnyru
@pjbunnyru 10 ай бұрын
@@fingerzinger5799i’m sure its true.
@lafosh7234
@lafosh7234 10 ай бұрын
They only got 2 of them..that was the balance justification back then and it stands even now …America has the ability to literally blanket the sky full of death traps forcing the enemy team defensive at the beginning of match….the ER is best missile in game but that’s ok….the ER will probably still be king when the first AMRAAMs come just because the first versions of AMRAAMs where kinda dog shit…u have to pray it’s pitbull capability catch someone not paying attention
@creepincreepy261
@creepincreepy261 5 ай бұрын
Well lookie now. Su27 with shitloads of missiles, yet the Americans still use the 7m, which is the same as the 7f, meaning it has been in the game for 2 years and they still haven't added a new one.
@k.o5641
@k.o5641 10 ай бұрын
The phoenix can be OP if they actually stop by scary of give em ich realistics 20Gs
@corybrown2197
@corybrown2197 10 ай бұрын
They can’t do that. That would make them competitive missiles and the game isn’t ready for true Fox-3’s yet.
@raygunreagan2274
@raygunreagan2274 10 ай бұрын
Or smokeless motor for the aim54c
@rodrigorras
@rodrigorras 10 ай бұрын
Mat how do you select/switch the long-range targets?
@OfficerSandbag
@OfficerSandbag 10 ай бұрын
The good thing with the R-27ER is that it has a low FOV with 1.4 i think so it is good for rear aspect
@Starkogi
@Starkogi 10 ай бұрын
You’re thinking of the R27T1
@henne5348
@henne5348 10 ай бұрын
Have you even watched the video?🤔😂 It's abour radar missiles
@OfficerSandbag
@OfficerSandbag 10 ай бұрын
@@henne5348 yes i did but i forgor😅
@sirpangoline
@sirpangoline 10 ай бұрын
How do yoy choose what to lock on with the radar the way you do with the wierd marker thing?
@vascoiraola5209
@vascoiraola5209 10 ай бұрын
#1 go to OPTIONS. Then write Radar in the search bar. after this many options will be shown to you. u must disable one. ( the third one) counting from above. Once that is disabled you are almost done. just one more thing: the controlls/keybins for you to moove the cursor around inside the radar. #2 go to CONTROLLS. search radar axis. (I'm not sure id that's the name) Then go and set up keybinss for the horizontal and vertical axis. I use the arrow looking keys for this. Anyways make SURE to not enable the relative option that is a available when settimg up theese axis. Why? because this will make the slew marker used to lock people up to slide. We don't want that wierd marker thing to slide do we? Aight man you are good to go no give me 1500ge. 💀💀💀
@wolfhound6396
@wolfhound6396 10 ай бұрын
Hey R27A R27EA R27EM R27P and R27EP are an interesting topic to talk about especially in context of war thunder please make a video about please I beg you Mat.
@kalynclemons8898
@kalynclemons8898 10 ай бұрын
So I want to point something out here after watching this. First the R27ER is ment to counter the American AIM-7F/M missiles which planes like the F16 and F14a and F14B carry in droves. Where planes like the mig-29, yak-141, and german Mig 29 carry only 2 of the ER’s. If the ER’s were to be removed it would make said planes in a nut shell unplayable since missiles like the R60m and R60mk are next to useless do to nerfs done to them. Saying that the R27R is on par with those American missiles is more of a laugh then anything. The R27er is being considered op is a laugh when all you do is fly away from the missile kick some flars and chaff do a roll and pull left or right and the missile will simply go on its way. Where the aim-7F/M track way better. Instead of focusing on the migs why not encourage updates to getting the other factions up to date with planes that can compete and before anyone say well there are lets point out that the most common aircraft anyone see’s at top tier is American planes or lend lease ones. I have nothing against them but who cares what the missiles and planes do when later down the road we will get more advanced planes. All this will cause is for german and russian factions to be even harder to get later future gen planes and the rest will just be mere laughingstock’s.
@hemendraravi4787
@hemendraravi4787 10 ай бұрын
r27er was added just to counter f14 with 6x sparrows. r27r is still worse than aim7f , from 10km shot 7f will reach first , from 30 km 7f will be wayy faster. so a mig29 with 4xr60 + 2xr27r vs f14 with 6xaim7f +2x aim9l. not only is the 7f better but it can carry 3 times more the amount. what they could have done is to add loal for r27r or the ability to relock targets on its own (those who fly straight). atm it would be balanced if they simply add aim7p (it can loft n has ins iirc) or just go for aim120s/r77s etc.
@Fatallydisorganized
@Fatallydisorganized 10 ай бұрын
Both the M and the P should be lofting. And the both have INS, the P had data link unlike the M.
@hemendraravi4787
@hemendraravi4787 10 ай бұрын
@@Fatallydisorganized only mh can loft not the base m.
@getbrutal4388
@getbrutal4388 10 ай бұрын
I was watching some streamer who will remain unnamed and him and his chat were talking shit to me on using missiles for BVR at all because "you can't get a ton of kills down low and get a 5 or 6-1 k/d". No matter what the plane they just missile joust low left or low right depending on the map, which works but it's stale imo. Personally I call bullshit that the streamer or the chat is able to get that in normal circumstances without a squad either way. Personally I love using the ER for BVR at the start since it's literally the use of the missile and I don't see why you can't get a bvr kill and then drop for some jousting anyway. It ticked me off kinda that they were so aggressive on this point.
@vascoiraola5209
@vascoiraola5209 10 ай бұрын
yee i feels you man. I got my lil friends clan in which we also farm kd but keep it fun by trolling and having fun with bvr. Some people just believe there is only one way to play top tier air rb guess. (top tier air best thing ever. along with some secondary russian cas.)
@user-if4zv5nj5m
@user-if4zv5nj5m 10 ай бұрын
Imho f16 vs mig29 have a fair balance in terms of a weapon systems. Sure, mig29 is much better in bvr, but in wt bvr fights are fought only by people who want to do it. You can just stick to the ground and avoid that phase. Mig has two fox1 that are much better than f16's ones, f16 has 4 nice aim9l which do outperform r60s. A lot of people are whining about great 27ers, but everbody forgets about a mig pilot's pain when he tries to kill somebody with r60s
@JFIESTASR
@JFIESTASR 10 ай бұрын
what they should have done is not put the r27er and put the r73 with the aim9m, they will be flareable but not as much like the others
@makrsu7619
@makrsu7619 6 ай бұрын
they did now lol
@yourcomrade4803
@yourcomrade4803 8 ай бұрын
Might be skill issue on my part but the R-27ER never hits long range (38-40km) at 9000 alt and 6000 alt Aircraft used: Mig29 Any advice?
@Beans64209
@Beans64209 7 ай бұрын
If they’re not hitting the deck or notching you shouldn’t have a problem with 40km I’ve had one kill in particular I remember it vividly I was doing Mach 1.15 on the deck and I lift my mig29 up after locking into someone at medium altitude so when I went to launch my missile wouldn’t waste energy or anything and then eventually it did get there at 40km nearly on the dot radar missiles will go “stupid” tracking their chaff or another enemy or even a teammate can mess it up it’s annoying but does happen
@lemangeur2poulet248
@lemangeur2poulet248 6 ай бұрын
Don’t expect a kill past 25km
@attilabarath7026
@attilabarath7026 9 ай бұрын
Enough if ideas what to take away instead of what to add. Thx.
@einstein3100
@einstein3100 10 ай бұрын
Can someone explain the upgrades of the aim54C since both the A and the C have the identical statcard
@Bastyxx227
@Bastyxx227 10 ай бұрын
Main difference irl was the seeker and the fact that the C could go pitbull more reliably I cant remember well, but I think the A basically never went pitbull, irl that is, in game they are basically the same
@John-Johnsonreal
@John-Johnsonreal 10 ай бұрын
the A is better, it weighs less but has more explosive mass anyone that uses the C is suffering from intense mental retardation, but to be fair, that is every american main so it might go full circle
@Fatallydisorganized
@Fatallydisorganized 10 ай бұрын
The main difference is that when the lock is lost while the missile is in flight the 54C will automatically turn on its seeker and destroy anything it sees. The 54A however cannot go pitbull when the lock is broken, it requires it reaches it designated point before the target to turn on requiring a lock all the way until that point.
@user-if4zv5nj5m
@user-if4zv5nj5m 10 ай бұрын
Irl aim54a could go pitbull only when received a command from the tomcat's datalink. If a tws track is broken even for a second, it won't activate and even arm its fuse. 54c behaves like a normal fox3, ie of the radar track is broken, it will fly to the last known position of the enemy, switch on its radar and try to find anything in front of it. Also the quality of an active seaker tracking improved
@GrandZero361
@GrandZero361 Ай бұрын
How can I even use it?
@fingerzinger5799
@fingerzinger5799 10 ай бұрын
I wish they could add the AIM-7P to the F-14
@narcissus5970
@narcissus5970 10 ай бұрын
They could but they dont want to make American aircraft better than the Russians
@v3es473
@v3es473 10 ай бұрын
USSR mains would cry
@sanmiguel4774
@sanmiguel4774 10 ай бұрын
@@v3es473and now usa mais cry. So fack off
@M0LOCK
@M0LOCK 10 ай бұрын
No it wasnt ppl just need to stop with the "away offensive" mind,a thing that ive away seen WT playerbase just dont defend going 60° isnt defending and a R27ER is no joke so just go cold and thats it,his range goes to only 12km with a even lower PK but noooooo that playerbase is made by greek gods,they never run,aways offensive ,aways the better one,the alpha and omega...inflated ego is the only thing that kills in WT,that excess of confidence...
@fuksoup
@fuksoup 10 ай бұрын
To be fair, they kinda do this pretty much every 6 months. Isreal has the best IR missiles, Russia has the best radar missiles, but it seems like theres a different flavor of who has the best thing every few months
@lafosh7234
@lafosh7234 10 ай бұрын
Those Israeli missiles goes nuts after 1 2 flares….let’s not use something which is easily countered
@fuksoup
@fuksoup 10 ай бұрын
@@lafosh7234Front aspect, yeah sure they do, but from the rear, they are pretty much unavoidable
@VectorGhost
@VectorGhost 10 ай бұрын
Funny how R27 series missiles are insanely good when in reality they're giant pieces of shit. They were never good, the Sparrow E-2 actually not preformed it, it was really bad missiles.
@dkvader2k782
@dkvader2k782 10 ай бұрын
The er was needed considering America is the only nation with fox 3 missiles.
@maximuskay1
@maximuskay1 10 ай бұрын
yeah, except the pheonix accelerates at like 15% the rate, pulls less Gs, and leaves a giant smoke trail if it is launched to even have a chance of hitting something.
@Gurubashy
@Gurubashy Ай бұрын
9 months later and this shit can't hit a mig 23 at 10 km range. The fk we're talking about?
@Gurubashy
@Gurubashy Ай бұрын
Can't hit a fking f4s from 4 km range
@SotGravarg
@SotGravarg 10 ай бұрын
Sometimes the R-27ER1 is sometimes shit too.
@kevinkroha9965
@kevinkroha9965 10 ай бұрын
2:37 I'm going to be angry :)
@macekeeks3085
@macekeeks3085 10 ай бұрын
the r27r alone is already a very good missile not sure why taking away r73s means they needed a better radar missile beats me but its here and what ever now
@the_duckzilla5521
@the_duckzilla5521 10 ай бұрын
Because if they nerf a Russian vehicle gaijin has to add another buff to compensate, such is the way of warthunder
@Beans64209
@Beans64209 10 ай бұрын
R27R has no range you’re usually only using radar missiles within 10km anyways but when you get those 50km perfect locks just for it not to matter because your missile wouldn’t reach doesn’t make any sense and I mean Russia has to have some type of bvr missile eventually and it’s not like the r27er can’t get dodged like any other sarh missile it’s just you will win in a missile joust if the enemy doesn’t have the r27er
@macekeeks3085
@macekeeks3085 10 ай бұрын
@@Beans64209 i mean bro France still is forced to use the 530d which only has a 30km seeker which is incorrect should be 20% higher r27r would be very comparable to it and the sparrow
@usmcpound
@usmcpound 10 ай бұрын
The Phoenix sucks. R27-ER is a MILLION times better
@lafosh7234
@lafosh7234 10 ай бұрын
My question for you mat is if you think we don’t need the ER when exactly was it supposed to come?….the next 2 major patches will be a big jump in tech ….For everyone…..the ER is the equalizer to the 54 spammers causing most of the enemy team to go defensive at the start of match
@Bobert_da_man
@Bobert_da_man 10 ай бұрын
the ER was made for the Flanker, so if it wasn’t added for the mig29, it would certainly be added with the su27
@collander7766
@collander7766 10 ай бұрын
another MiG-29 variant maybe, idk. Any other later jet really. It's not hard to counter the Phoenix, you can do that with a regular R-27 or an AIM-7.
@lafosh7234
@lafosh7234 10 ай бұрын
@@collander7766 give a example how you would counter a missile truck carrying up to 6 fox3’s with just a simple fox 1 that requires constant lock?…and also that missile truck carrying just as much fox 3’s as it could those very same Fox-1’s….the base r27 ain’t trash but because of its plateform and limitations it won’t put a Tom cat in the defensive in most situations..the tomcat has multiple options to fuck you in a bvr fight basically..while you have to hope he fell asleep while climbing
@collander7766
@collander7766 10 ай бұрын
@@lafosh7234 literally pull in any direction when you hear a radar lock. Or just notch for 5 seconds. Phoenix will go crazy. I've never been hit by one
@lafosh7234
@lafosh7234 10 ай бұрын
@@collander7766 yea as I said it’s effective at making you go defensive…which puts you at a early disadvantage
@Storlans
@Storlans 2 ай бұрын
Russia is just op since they have the best missiles.
@Miratesus
@Miratesus 10 ай бұрын
Make the Phoenix act like it does in DCS and the problem will be solved.
@user45g-4c5rf
@user45g-4c5rf 10 ай бұрын
Not that... The 530D too.
@FNINE9
@FNINE9 10 ай бұрын
what postfx you use
@tensor8804
@tensor8804 10 ай бұрын
Yeah, the whole USSR tree was too much. US and few third world countries would be enough.
@marelnix
@marelnix 10 ай бұрын
Then, the er is worse than the r?
@23thenicu
@23thenicu 10 ай бұрын
Of course not, ER is way better, even at close range since it has 2 seconds of a very strong initial booster making it accelerate 2 times faster than R-27R during these 2 seconds, and then proceeds to accelerate at the same rate as R-27R for another 7 seconds. This means that R-27ER is always faster than R-27R, regardless of circumstances.
@observador.555
@observador.555 10 ай бұрын
I also have this opinion that the R27ER was too much if they hadn't put him in the game would be more balanced nowadays I don't even know how an R27ET would be in the game would it be even more OP?
@weltall7283
@weltall7283 10 ай бұрын
Reminder that Gaijin has not adjusted vehicle performance away from claims that are known to be overperforming IRL, and ignore actual wartime performance (looking at ukraine). In a spot where it said a T-90 couldn't be frontally penned, there's an image of a sabot passing right through and making a massive hole through the tank
@hemendraravi4787
@hemendraravi4787 10 ай бұрын
so by ur logic u want 50% of sparrows to simply self explode , all phoenix to miss unless ur enemy is flying straight.
@weltall7283
@weltall7283 10 ай бұрын
@@hemendraravi4787 they already basically do that in game. Sparrows barely track half the time
@ser43_OLDC
@ser43_OLDC 10 ай бұрын
@@hemendraravi4787 just let alonse this dues. The have been repeating the same like parrots since the last year
@collander7766
@collander7766 10 ай бұрын
@@hemendraravi4787 very early Sparrows man. The US military still uses the same Sparrows we have in game so we can expect very high reliability IRL
@hemendraravi4787
@hemendraravi4787 10 ай бұрын
@@weltall7283 so u want barely tracks -> never tracks ?
@WurstWesen82
@WurstWesen82 10 ай бұрын
Oh, look... Chinese bots... how surprising. Good video though.
@FM-hw8yv
@FM-hw8yv 10 ай бұрын
if only that thing would ever hit for me. I lauch and turn off my radar to not make the enemy flare. Never once gotten a hit with it
@sannishott79
@sannishott79 10 ай бұрын
Its not a fox 3 missile you cant do that with r27r
@FM-hw8yv
@FM-hw8yv 10 ай бұрын
@@sannishott79 then how else I fire it and then never hit Also its a missile/rocket....Not some fox
@doomedt-62
@doomedt-62 10 ай бұрын
You have to launch it with a radar lock, then switch to a TWS lock, so that the missile is guided by inertial guidance and data link and all that stuff I am not too well-versed in. As the missile gets close, hard lock the enemy again. They will have little time to notch and make the missile go stupid, and usually will die as a result.
@FM-hw8yv
@FM-hw8yv 10 ай бұрын
@@doomedt-62 TWS what? Is locking it on radar not enough already
@doomedt-62
@doomedt-62 10 ай бұрын
@@FM-hw8yv Locking on radar for the whole flight will mean the enemy is alerted for the entire flight of the missile and is more likely to dodge because of it. TWS doesn't alert the enemy, so they don't know that the missile is still going for them until it's too late.
@WarWolf__C7
@WarWolf__C7 10 ай бұрын
dude you are out of ideas right now 😂
@AE_productions07
@AE_productions07 10 ай бұрын
Irl the r27 was EXTREMELY unreliable but ofc it’s gaijin anything that’s Russian is gonna get an artificial buff
@miquelescribanoivars5049
@miquelescribanoivars5049 10 ай бұрын
AIM-7's track record ain't that great either, and yes, that's including late variants.
@creepincreepy261
@creepincreepy261 5 ай бұрын
@@miquelescribanoivars5049 The late varients used in the gulf war managed a hit rate of 68.2% and a kill rate of 59.1%. The r27ER had a kill rate of 30%.
@Eagle-kp7fx
@Eagle-kp7fx 10 ай бұрын
*cough* russian bias *cough* *cough* Its not that Gaijin should not have added it, they should have not added it YET, its a missle that has 10 years of tech advancment from any other aircraft technology. Not only that but the phoenix shoud be way more powerful, It was super hard to outpull because it was so fast, not only that, the 27er was a VERY VERY unreliable missile (probably due to radars though), it was historicly BAD, (Im saying this because I love russian aircraft)
@coty.ott0359
@coty.ott0359 10 ай бұрын
Phoenix missiles where meant for bombers
@M1A2_Abrams_MBT
@M1A2_Abrams_MBT 10 ай бұрын
@@Carlosdf14 Source?
@M1A2_Abrams_MBT
@M1A2_Abrams_MBT 10 ай бұрын
It's unfortunate, but Warthunder isn't even close to being a realistic game. Plane flight models are artificially nerfed/buffed for balance and Russian bias.
@coty.ott0359
@coty.ott0359 10 ай бұрын
@@Carlosdf14 it has 2 uses and no kills right now it has 100% combat inefficiency
@Shadoweye12
@Shadoweye12 10 ай бұрын
@@coty.ott0359 It does have a 'one missile, three kills' story, but that was an Iranian pilot against 3 Mig-23s that were flying absurdly close to eachother, not sure how true that its but that's the only incident/story of a Pheonix dogfight kill I'm aware of. I'm not aware of any Pheonix kills done by US pilots. There could be a cargo plane kill or something like that, but definitely no 'dogfight' kills with that missile for the US that I am aware of.
@leenel9385
@leenel9385 10 ай бұрын
Not second
@no-vs3sb
@no-vs3sb 10 ай бұрын
Third.
@Tyonicle
@Tyonicle 10 ай бұрын
Not third
@AlienMuffi
@AlienMuffi 10 ай бұрын
Not first.
EVERY SOVIET MISSILE IN DETAIL | R-3S to R-27ER
15:13
Jaek_
Рет қаралды 113 М.
Indian sharing by Secret Vlog #shorts
00:13
Secret Vlog
Рет қаралды 53 МЛН
1❤️
00:20
すしらーめん《りく》
Рет қаралды 32 МЛН
IFR training flight KPLU to KKLS
16:26
Andy Clapp
Рет қаралды 83
So The Mig-29 SMT Got An Upgrade...
10:45
Joob
Рет қаралды 46 М.
MiG-29 Multirole Jet in Ground RB Mode (War Thunder)
14:55
How to Survive in Top Tier Jets | War Thunder
7:50
General Lee
Рет қаралды 40 М.
MiG-23MLD Is Still A Beast
17:29
GOOSE
Рет қаралды 24 М.
дед пранканул маму киллера #роблокс #мем #анимация
0:43
почему Гавс боится Барли в Brawl Stars?
0:20
Holy Baam
Рет қаралды 3,6 МЛН
Please Help Steve In Lava Pit Challenge
0:31
ToonToon Daily
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Майнкрафт ПЕСНЯ 2🎙 | WICSUR #shorts
1:00
Бискас
Рет қаралды 3,7 МЛН