Cool guys don't look at explosions

Fire and forget like a boss

Yeah, the Typhoon is known to set its own engine blaze when starting

*screams in F7U Cutlass not being able to take off*

The first rank made me remember the tank from halo idkkkkkkk

*Screams in Wyvern doing a flameout from firewalling*

*screams in many late-war Japanese aircraft having self-sealing fuel tanks*

"Oh, great, we are both the Navy and the Marines now."

"confused scream" what idiotic meme...

@@the_bane_of_all_anti_furry what an idiodic comment and person

@@the_bane_of_all_anti_furry before you criticize someone’s intelligence, maybe you should go to back school because you clearly didn’t pay attention in Grammar class

penis

@@floppa4335 what

You can get the Obj 490 in Armored Warfare. It's a Tier 10 Premium. Pretty fun to play

As we are at it, there existed a prototype version of the Wiesel 1 with a " 30 mm caseless ammunition recoilless revolver cannon". The projectiles muzzle energy was presumably higher than that of the A10 Thunderbolt 2 gatling gun. I want this vehicle in warthunder so badly :D.

Yes, that's what I thought too. In 2003 we took a ride with Wiesel through the woods. It was deadly in the woods.

@@mandernachluca3774 Wiesels with the TOW would basically be the new ASU-57. Tiny but deadly.

I like that concept of the modular tank

Sounds like a GI Joe toy.

It was just a bad attempt to make an airmobile tank though. The USAF bought C-5 and the US Army hasn't looked back since.

So like Japanese mecha but less exciting

Q

Only in a metal gear game eh? Ever hear of armored warfare?

@@GSC-Operator-chan beat me to it lol

It’s in armored warfare as of now, and it’s debatably one of the best vehicles in the game.

Romeo Victor not anymore because there is more and more roof-hitting missile and its firing rate is really a pain for me

Actually no vehicle in the metal gear serious looks like object490，its design is more close to some Gundam or command and conquer vehicles

It will be both the nightmare of NATO tank and Soviet field Engineers

I wonder they can make it now because of better technology and would be easier to produce

Have you seen the T14? It's almost the same thing.

@@Kyle-gw6qp no but I will look into it

@@TgamerBio5529 it's the newest ever tank revealed in 2000 and something.

If I were to design a moon tank, it would probably be something like a hovercraft with a recoilless rifle. That being said, I'm an idiot, so what do I know?

the vacuum would negatively affect the RR surely.

@@matthiuskoenig3378 I would think it would actually be better, being rocket based and all. Mostly because it wouldn't send your tank off in the other direction though

Realistically the idea of a moon tank is kinda infeasible. Tanks are extremely heavy and moving stuff to space is very expensive. If you could move mass cheaply and easily you could probably have much more effective ways of waging “space war”.

@@jonathanpfeffer3716 yeah but i think this is talking about a reality were people already Live on the moon and can build stuff there with the moons resources.

Funnily enough, Obj 490 got Evgeny fired from KMDB (it's more complicated than that TBF). The video author says it had to do with cost but that's not true, it was mostly because the tank was seen as inferior in gun depression and a sort of "ultimate T-80" (i.e. biggest gun in smallest/shortest package) by the Armor Directorate [the Soviet equivalent of the American Tank and Automotive Command]. The Soviet Army at this point (~1980) was no longer interested in reducing crew sizes (they had just finished a human factors study that showed that T-64 was much harder to maintain with three crewmen than T-62 was) or the size of the tank: they were willing to accept a bigger tank if it meant it would be easier to maintain with conscript crews. 490 had two crewmen and the division of labor in combat was unknown (according to the Armor Directorate, it would have been unsatisfactory or something) while maintenance would have been even harder. His colleagues tank, Obj 490A, was much more conventional in layout, had a "conventional" three-man crew, and had actually usable gun depression. 490A looked like a cross between the US Army's Stryker MGS and the T-80, eventually became Boxer, which became the T-95, which became the Ukrainian main battle tank prototype Nona, which drove around some field in Ukraine in 2001-2002 and shot about 40 rounds of 152mm. Nona still lives at KMDB IIRC and a lot of the technology from that tank was used in BM-Oplot. Namely the ERA, engine vectronics, and optronics. Regardless, the human factors won, and that's why 490A got chosen over 490. So ultimately it came down to ergonomics and the ability of the crew to fight in combat, not cost. The Soviets would have thrown any amount of money at the tank at this point. The collapse didn't begin in earnest until around 1986 anyway. There's a book by one of the engineers involved in 490 called The Last Charge of the Soviet Tank Engineers (or similar) that talks about it. In it, Evgeny Morozov comes off as a dick and actively tries to sabotage the 490A by promoting his 490 internally, against the wishes of both the Armor Directorate and his actual boss, and eventually gets fired for it. The engineer who wrote the book lives in Kharkiv now and last I heard he's still salty as hell that Putin hasn't liberated him from the Ukrainian Maiden Nazis or something, but he'd be in his late 80's or something now so he might be dead.

@@SecuR0M"no longer interested in reducing crew sizes" but the soviets had a separate maintenance platoon in every battalion, a separate maintenance company in every regiment and a separate maintenance battalion in every division, which performed routine and front line vehicle maintenance, the size of the vehicle's crew shouldn't and didn't matter to the soviets for vehicle maintenance. source: Soviet Army Operations, United States. Army Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center, The Center, 1983. which itself sited the 1976 soviet army operations manual unless this changed (which i have not seen so far, but i am no expert) it seems unlikely they would consider it an issue. then again internal space being smaller would hamper separate maintenance crews aswell. also the Object 477A1 'Nota' was a joint Ukrainian-Russian Fed project not just a Ukrainian one. which i think is what you mean by 'Nona' (which was a soviet airborne vehicle) and the T-95 (object 195) is an unrelated project [in terms of design] designed by Uralvagonzavod (Designers of T-72 and T-62) not Kharkov (Designers of T-64, and object 490A and object 477)

thats not a obj 490 its the aw version of a obj 490. the real one looked way different

Kat Tsun sorry，do you have any more information about E.A. Morozov？What's his relationship with Alexander Morozov？

reefta we already got the 279 (2) can’t wait to get the regular 279 aka Stalin’s UFO

Looked it up. It was abandoned for being too expensive, probably because of the secondary nozzles that were needed for steering and stabilizing it.

Chrysler TV-8 amphibious tank. Massive lols

Seens like a new Fallout tank

Sooo 2 reactors?

The TV-8 was designed to fire nuclear weapons from it's 90mm gun the hull of the turret is designed to survive the shockwave of the nuclear blast.

Bruh... the tv-8 is the word "derp" made into a vehicle.

@@CreepSoldier yep. And indeed Bethesda should have taken those two as inspirations.

Well both have big guns and extra sets of tracks.

Yes！Finally someone mention it！

The GTA V military vehicles are based on RL models - the Rhino tank is a Leopard 2A4 as example

That’s brawn, not devastator

A random Halo dude No it’s called Brawl

You don't know about vast russian tank projects actually. About chinese also. There's many interesting exemplars

>and the F-22 and F-35 borrowing a lot from the Yak-41. No, they don't. At most F-35 borrowed the flight data of Yak-41. F-22 didn't even that since it's not short takeoff plane

But not to forget Ships with fucking legs

sorry it is YMT-05 hildolfr，plz forgive me

placeholder At least its idea was inherited by Amrata project but just not the weird shape

Now I wish they would have made one test unit.