17 years now

Agreed. Back when they cared more about the story than political ideology

​@DSVN23 it's not political ideology, it's corporate greed. They know they'll still sell tickets even if their vfx artists are rushed and underfunded. it's literally just greed, not political at all

@@doghat1619 no it’s politics, if they cared about money only they would have stopped. They’re hemorrhaging money and are struggling hard but aren’t stopping. They’re willing to kill themselves for politics

@@doghat1619 depending on the case, it can actually be both

There should be an "Captain" somewhere in that

I didn't realize how accurate that depicts this scene

INCREDIBLY stupid.

His quotes sound like gibberish but actually always makes sense

@@roygroeneveld5582 The* Captain Jack Sparrow

Truly legendary!

The one who can beat the devil twice

Damn. It's too bad you didn't get to say "You're a liar and you will spend an eternity on this ship!" 😂 But that's pretty damn epic.

​@@NoriMori1992you mean "spend some groundedness in this house"

Well that’s the most blatant lie I’ve ever seen

That's a good point!

Honestly, even if it was the other way, supposing Jones plays fair even for a little Bill can just call liar on any turn and cut the game short. It works out nicer if Jones has to call out Bill to finish the game, but the mere presence of Bill here is a plenty.

sort of. if play was going the other way, they would have had to make different bets. if will had bet something extremely risky, jones could have gotten him, but if jone's tried to trap will with the 7-5's trap, bootstrap had an opportunity to either A: call jones and end it, or B: raise the stakes so high that Will had no choice but to throw his father under the bus. even with reverse turn order, all will has to do is play safe, and if it gets too risky, bill can still throw himself on the sword.

Only thing scarier than the boogeyman is the man willing to throw everything at one goal.

And as another commentor pointed out, not only did he insert himself into the game, he *reversed the usual turn order*.

I guess at this point the only thing that kinda confuses me is how the hell Davy didn't notice such an obvious problem with his plan right up until the very moment Bill bid twelve 5's. Dude outright says "Welcome to the crew, lad" and it's like bro, according to how this table's laid out it's literally impossible for you to say that, always has been, Bill would have to be the one to call out Will and everyone knows that's never happening.

@@MirroredDreamscape you’d be surprised how much hubris can blind you to the most minor of details.

@@F-Lambda I think he didn’t realize the problem because it wasn’t actually a problem. I don’t like the assumption that Davy couldn’t call Will a liar because it wasn’t his turn and it was really smart for Bill to come in an establish the turn order the way he did. I think the clever thing Bill did was quickly take his turn before Davy could call out Will. Davy’s arrogance made him gloat to Will before calling him a liar. Bill quickly took that opportunity to take his own turn meaning that Davy could no longer call out Will. That is also why Bill immediately says to Davy “go ahead, call me a liar”. He’s asserting that that is the only choice Davy has. The bid has gotten too high but Davy is only allowed to call Bill a liar because Bill was the last person to up the bid.

it’s actually no cgi

@@cesarromero4169 this is factually inaccurate??

There's just no way that's true, considering how much cgi is in films these days, the vast majority of which you have no clue you are even looking at cgi.

@@gfox00029 its because back then directors got the best of the best, whereas nowadays, they're getting the bare minimum instead of the best to save money

That's because it is not cgi. They say it in the commentary "There's no way we could've done the cgi for all those tentacles for the whole movie" so they didn't. They are mechanical.

I agree. I do think that despite how popular the series is, it isnt popular for the main reasons the original was. The first one was awesome because of the swashbuckling pirate fun, the paranormal stuff made the plot fun, but as the series went on it got TOO paranormal. In my opinion anyways. Everyones unique and their opinions make the world perfect... sometimes... some opinions are bad. Like.. REALLY bad.

This is actually genius

@@alexiboo7309 I think the “trilogy” strikes the okay point. Errring on too much. But the latter 2 definitely push it too far. But I agree. It’s all about the splash of fantasy thrown in.

@@alexbobenrieth3888 thanks :)

@@darko-man8549 yup. All the films are cheesy. Just gotta maintain the right levels of it.

Because he's using his suction cups for the dice when shaking it, he can get whatever result he wants

I never noticed it in the movie. Only in the video lol

There's another detail where the Dutchman first goes 'DOWN', Jones holds on to his hat with his tentacles

and in the end everyone won, as in they all got what they wanted from the game. will learned the key location, bill saved his son and jones asserted his dominance.

Fair point.

It's also important that Bill was before Jones, because that makes him the person Jones is most likely to call a liar

@@fangsabre Exactly. Which is why Bill made that the turn order.

If you really want to push this theory that comment of telling the captain to go next was the FIRST bluff. When gambling you ALWAYS go clockwise. Bill reversed the order by telling Davey Jones to go next, whether out of anger, annoyance, or his attention being fully set on Will he failed to call that out against Bill. Bill bluffed the turn order assuring he'd win from the start. A stretch I'm sure but interesting thought still I think.

"Mahstur TERNAH...feel free tuhgoh ashooOOre..th'vAIRY next tiiiime we MAYK-UH POWRT! A-HA! HA HA! HAHAHA!

@@MrMrMrprofessor what is Davy Jones saying?

@@zodiacknightleo7572 "Master Turner, feel free to go ashore..the very next time we make port!"

@@MrMrMrprofessor thank you.

DEW YAH FEEEYAAHRRR DEYATHH-UH?!!

I didn't know that. He absolutely killed it.

@@destructionindustries1987 That's what professionals do. And that dude is a straight professional.

Bill Nighy is a complete legend, easily top 10 actors in our lifetime (I say this just because god knows how many great actors were lost to time before filming them existed)

@@thegatorhator6822 bill who?

But it is not perfect indicating that he still has his flaws.

I figured all the dice were rigged.

getting high numbers isnt an advantage, getting lots of the same is

@@qwertyuioph both are advantages in the game, just high roll is lower than same face. the fact that Jone has both high rolls and same face said it all.

the real kicker is Bill joined the game after Will, and with that took Davy turn to call Will's bluff. Like a pawn that's in the right place, Bill low roll doesn't matter. Because he had already won his game.

I think it really is just the shear amount of effort put into them. All the BTS I’ve seen of Pirates have made it clear that Jones was an absolute PITA to get right but the results are worth it.

He is a hella attractive tentacle monster.

Aslan still holds up incredibly well too

Facts

There was a lot of effort put into him from start to finish, character design, body language, and all the little details. The work put into him was legendary.

Woooooaaaaaah....

That sounds more like a serendipitous accident.

@@RuneKatashima It probably is, but there's still some poetry to it.

Four is considered unlucky? never heard that before.

@@burningphoneix In Japanese it is since words "four" and "death" are similiar

Are all the characters original?

Seriously. Pirates of the Caribbean is a gift to humanity.

@@floridaman6982to the movies. They did not exist before the movies. The boat ride was just generic pirate

Yep. For example when Davy Jones has his four 5s, his seven 5s bet only needs 3/10 from Will and Bootstrap to be 5s. Even ignoring information he might get from their bets, there is a decent chance the others have enough to cover his bet by pure odds.

@@ttt5020 Yeah, I remember from playing the DS game Dead Man's Chest and playing Liar's Dice a lot, you get used to what can be considered a comfortable bid by assuming from what the opponents have. If I rolled 4 fives and bid 6 fives, it's a good chance that out of 10 dice at least 2 of their will be fives. There were a couple games I lost due to chance where I rolled, say, 4 fives and bid 5 fives and lost because no one else rolled a five. It's incredibly unlucky and improbable, but it can happen though that's the game.

true but one would assume that we were given the base odds because we would need 3 different odds values if looking at the game from jones, bill, and wills PoVs if you wanted to do it that way and theres already so mnay numbers involved as it is that giving baseline is simpler

Not to mention the glaring obvious error that guessing a number on a roulette wheel is 36:1 odds. When there are 38 possible numbers on the wheel. From this point on all credibility was gone for me. Also, that green hair looks ridiculous.

@@Turboginge european roulette has 37 which makes 36:1 correct. and being mean abt appearances is real mature too

"Cause u ain't shit Jones. Or do I need to make a song out of it? "

Will wins in the deleted scene?

Although it's a great line, I think the movie works better without that scene. In the deleted scene Will successfully frees his father, which kind of makes it less clear why he still needs the key. Bootstrap being free might help explain why he was allowed to take part in the second game, but since his bid was "an eternity of servitude" it was already valid in the final cut of the movie. Also, the numbers rolled on the dice in the deleted scenes are absurd when you look at it statistically: Out of 10 dice there are five 3s, and five 6s.

@@Blokewood3 Sure it's absurd to get five threes and five sixes But that's the "magic" of probability JUST because it isn't all that LIKELY Doesn't mean it CAN'T happen. Besides, it would also show more character from all three of the participants overall.

@@freakymoejoe2 will and Jones play the game before the one shown in this scene where he won his father's freedom The second game they play for the key and Bootstrap uses the freedom his son just won him as a buy-in

And the performance of those around him who have to not be distracted by his kooky getup is also impressive.

No. It's Davy Jones-sa

Yes yes yes yes!

Even in that mo-cap costume his performance is creepy as hell.

He was pretty good in castlevania too

But with that Twelve 5s bid, Davy Jones only really has one option. Call him a liar. If he doesn't, no matter what bet he makes, he will lose fave in front of the entire crew. It is akin to backing down from fist fight.

Good catch! Davy's arrogance and refusal to accept defeat was a key part of his character flaws, so the game highlighted it in a subtle way that really worked out to a great narrative.

Woah yours is a great analysis too!

@@revenantcode7633 Bot just refusal, in a pirate crew, your respect is everything. If your crew thinks your too soft or too untrustworthy, you could see a mutiny on your hands. So Davy Jones is inherently going to pick the option that always helps him save face.

Not historically. I know these movies take place in a fictional past with magic and shit, I just think it's fun to know history. Pirates were actually purely democratic. They shared profit much more evenly than legal ships, generally two shares for the captain, one and a half to the carpenters and "doctors" and one to the rest. You'd also find crewmembers just hopping off the dock and not going back. Finding a new ship to pirate on, getting a legal job, drinking away their booty for a few months, anything at all.

And we love him for it.

*Comment redacted due to its stupidity*

@@greatlegacyoftanks5511 youre thinking of Bill

@@hiddensinix2767 ... just reread everything... well I got caught being the dork...

I though he said 'being adored'.

And it all gets paid off with Bill’s and Will’s (and Norrington’s too) arcs in the third film.

Just watched that, holy shit incredible.

Oh! Really? Didn't know that...

@@KingKalashnikov wait it gets worse Davy Jones probably expected bootstrap bill to call will a liar to escape the Flying Dutchman as well

Ok

Yeah I dunno how much dice he's rolled if he thinks that's preposterous lol

I feel this

It is highly unlikely. It is as equally unlikely as any other exactly specified roll of the same number of dice. And pattern seeking, climactic consequences, near misses, these lead to you remembering the all 1 roll more than the times you rolled all 4s.

The epicness of your fail has ended your party...Thank you for playing!

@@FFKonoko not really uncommon for me to completely fail armor saves lol, ork t-shirt saves make me long for old 5e 'ard armor.

When I first saw that I thought so too. But then again... Davy: "7 Fives" Will: "Yeah, seems possible..."

You are not alone. I didn't understand the game until I watched this video. And I agree, the movie edit didn't even need you to understand the rules of the game to know what is going on between the three players and that scene was brilliantly written that way.

I was so intrigued by the scene as a kid I learned how to play it (and taught my little brother). Our parents weren't entirely hot on the idea of a gambling game so we used Runescape gold as stakes.

Interesting lol when I got to this scene I had already played liar's dice countless times, even as a kid so I got it perfectly, I wonder if it's not so popular everywhere but here it's a common parlor game and you can reasonably find dices and cups in people's places how you'd do with playing cards.

Glad I'm not the only one who was confused by that!

That assuming he knew Jones had some fives of his own. That's the thing, in the first turn, you can't infer anything.

@@gantzllat he didn't need to know anything; since Jones showed the key's location, the game just needed to be over, and Will needed to not lose.

@@XperimentalOdin he didn't really know that that was the goal

I think by doing that, it would appear it was intentionally rigged... and Jones would just kill Will... By having Bootstrap play "fair" Jones felt like he won, so he wouldn't harm anyone. By it being a final sacrifice to save what appeared to be a lost game it was clear to EVERYONE who saw who really won the duel. This left no reason to turn on and hurt anyone after the game, dominance was established and an ego was stroked. Any situation where Jones doesn't feel like he won a "fair" game results in a loss.

@@XperimentalOdin What I mean, was that in order to even conceive the idea of bidding 7 fives, he would have to know Jones had 4

So assuming the two cards on the table have a value of ten, and it's a one person deal, then 4 of the remaining 50 cards will yield the desired result, or about an 8% chance of success. Making that bet is most assuredly a terrible move. However, if everyone in this position were to make that bet, then a Casino with several tables would very likely see this exact scenario play out every single night, roughly once in every 140 games or so. In reality it happens much more rarely because most players will look out for their own self interest, and the casino is betting on that.

It's times like that I think God is having a good laugh

I did that once. But the dealer had blackjack the sonofabitch

@@parad0xheart casinos don’t use a single deck of cards, it’s usually at least a 7 deck shoe to prevent card counting.

Had?

This

@@narutokiubissj2 Great insight, I am glad you took the time. It really adds some flavor to the comment section you fucking tool. Anyway, I came because I love the scene but was very pleased with the additional analysis. I'm going to comb through previous videos and potentially subscribe based on this video.

My night has been made. This video, this comment thread. Just, thank you all for making my night.

@@W4RKID 2:50 I don't trust a man with painted nails. Don't believe whatever you dreampt about.

imagine the excitement my broter and I had, knowing this game from our adolescence, then seeing this shit go down when we saw it in theatres!! hype train, all aboard!

Will: "70 fives." Tentacle Senpai: "Oh come on, Bootstrap Bill! That's more dice than there are on this ship! Call your son a liar!" Bill: "96 fives." Tentacle Senpai: "This is ridiculous. 97 fives!"

@DreamCanvas The only flaw in your scenario is why WOULDN'T will call dj a liar once it was a mathematical certainty that that was the case? :-)

Irrelevant Noob will *had* to lose, remember?

@@SYKRAL1 not sure about that... He wanted the key, and i feel that losing isn't really needed for that goal. ;-??

@@irrelevant_noob because theres nothing stopping davy jones from giving will the key, killing him and then taking it back, as explained in the video.

Not gonna lie, this dice game sounds fun. Ever play the card game bullshit? Each players get 10 cards on there hand. Flip the first card from the deck up. All players take turn putting a card from their hand onto the table going one number up or down while calling the number out. They can face the card up or down. If the card is down, the next player can call bullshit if they think the facing down card wasn't what the player called and lose.

@@hahaimasian sounds like liars dice is the dice version of bullshit

incrível mesmo.

Wow nice explanation! What an incredibly intense and underrated scene

I know this might not be as crucial but will did not wager a 100 years but literally an eternity . But why this is crucial is because will needed to get Davy Jones's attention by making such a ridiculous wager that it would strike a nerve . How you ask exactly? Well that's what the deleted scene shows Davy Jones only plays against a man who bets something very valuable and hence no one would ever actually do so . This means 2 things 1) Will wants something very valuable in return 2) He(will that is) is so confident that he will win that he has bet to stand before the mast for an ETERNITY . Now Davy Jones HAS to match his wager with whatever will wants to show that Davy Jones is still confident to win . This means that as soon as Davy Jones said "Aye!! Acepptedah!!" to Will he had lost the game.

@@samkul1699 No it was a 100 years. Either you are misremembering or you didn't read his comment properly.

Thanks, now I don't have to watch this soy boy jaw on for 20 minutes

@@rizvan1632 no, no, Will bet an eternity

Yeah that's pretty great.

How much of deleted bits are there? Like 10 minutes worth of them or something like that?

@@ferro1398 It's on YT, thre's a whole 4-6 minutes of it for just this scene.

Deleted Scene: Will's Dice: 3, 6, 6, 6, 6 Jones' Dice: 6, 3, 3, 3, 3 Round 1: Will starts with a safe bluff by bidding two 3s. I assume from the rest of the game that he's beginning a long bluff to throw Jones off. Jones has plenty of 3s so knows Will is lying. Jones decides to play safe with three 3s, it doesn't reveal much of what he might have. His plan is probably to wait until he has a better idea of what Will might be hiding. Round 2: Will goes for a risky bluff of four 3s which likely throws Jones off into thinking Will has more 3s than he does. With Jones also having many 3s Jones finally goes for a bluff with five 3s. The chances of Jones having four 3s is actually pretty low so the fact that Will doesn't call his bluff probably confirms it for Jones that Will has more than one three. Round 3: Will suddenly goes for five 6s. After being bluffed into believing he has a few 3s, Jones probably doubts that Will can have anything more than three 6s and that he's out of options and is probably making a desperate gamble on Jones having more than one 6. Will seems to be playing a long bluff before making it appear as if he ran out of options and trapping Jones with the four 6s. Jones seems to be playing it safe and gathering information, maybe hoping to read Will and catch him out on a lie.

I'm just learning of this and it's a tragedy it wasn't included

Exactly, if that rule was in place there'd be no need for all the tension in this scene. Unless Davy was banking on Bill throwing Will under the bus?

@@boyo7918 Exactly. Bootstrap Bill was honest (making the most optimal moves) through the entire game. Then turned dishonest (not making the optimal move) as the final move. Jones thought Bill (being both a safe optimal player and also someone subservient to him) would pick the optimal choice to avoid losing.

Yeah I don't know where OP got that rule from. It doesn't follow at all from the movie, or from his own explanation.

@@sumelar It's for the same reason that player claims are called 'bids' - the game fundamentally works on a bidding system, so any new claims overwrite the old one. Lie claims can only be called when it's your turn. So, having a player at the table that is not playing 'fairly' but is instead deliberately trying to lose the game if the player before them on the turn order is about to lose, means that effectively Davy's ability to call Will a liar is removed by Bootstrap. The 'auction' style of game is more obvious when the game is played in multiple rounds where players gain and lose dice based on successful or failed lie claims, instead of being played outright in a single round, in a game where there are more than two players. More usually it's more like Poker in that players drop out of the game as they lose dice, and the actual winner of the game is the player that's won all the dice.

@@paulbrookfield4133 Being able to call someone a liar is not what we're talking about. The issue is you can apparently only call the player whose turn is right before yours a liar, and no one else. Which does not follow from anything the OP said, or anything you said for that matter. It's a moronic rule that isn't shown anywhere in the movie, and isn't explained at all in the video.

jokes on you they're weighted dice and he does that every year

@@user6122 can weighted dices do a certain order? Legit question,i have no idea.

@@rodrigo3732 i thought it was like yahtzee and they're all thrown at once

@@user6122 ohh i see.

That's the moment when you learn that probability is not a guarantee of a particular event happening. But it's a statistical average of many trials. Say if you flip a coin, and you get a head the first time, there is no guarantee that the universe must make the second flip a tail. You might still get two heads in a row in two trials. But when you flip 100 coins for example, or flip one coin 100 times, you can estimate that half of them will be heads and half tails. Probability is most "accurate" when there is a large sample set, not so much for predicting the next outcome.

We don't know if he would have been a fish. He could have been a dolphin or whale, or a crustacean, or even a cephalopod. Davey himself is Crustacean and Cephalopod, after all. I think a few of the crew members are even part coral, part barnacle, or part wood. That gives seven potential options for what Will could become a hybrid of, going off of animal/plant type.

I always imagined the Fishman line to mean he'll be incorporated but with every new upgrade it'll be justified as. It ain't a fish matey. Tbh I'm a bit fuzzy on the series as a whole but I always took it in as Will won't be a fishman But someday hell be the new Davy Jones. As human as he wishes to remain. It'll only be a husk. In terms of husk. I feel like one so I can relate. Maybe Jones felt the same way. Benefits of the doubt for great characters but only failing because the times around them have changed. You realize between. 1000bc and 1300ad Are rarely covered in media. It might have bits but for some reason around certain lands this is a Grey period. As an actual person i doubt what history I've learned in the US But I know in this series there's greater hope for ppl. I just knew as a fan. Will will be what he hates. I have hope but ppl change and its usually those we least expect. I hope will stays human but idk either way if I meet will vs Jones at sea I don't mind being a slave. I'm already dead. Maybe not today or later but eventually

Unfortunately for Bill, Will decided to move to Innsmouth afterwards.

Part of the crew, part of the ship. Remember what almost happened to Bootstrap in At World's End?

@@tristanmitchell1242 Actually iirc, doesn't Davy only look the way he does because he had neglected his assigned job of ferrying souls?

Hope you can play the game. It's a lot of fun even if you aren't gambling years of slavery away.

It's a fun game, and all you need is a bunch of dice and some cups!

I still don't fully get it because I have always, always sucked at working out mathematical probability. Had to go over it 2-3 times throughout high school and college, and it just about killed my course grade every time. This video helped me understand the scene better, but the quality of the emotional beats in this scene is why it's still somewhat coherent to me and ultimately why I still love it, because the math of it all has completely flown over my head (until now after seeing this video where I at least understand the rules, if not the exact calculations and likelihood of each probability).

@@Tyler_W Oh gods yeah, statistics and probabilities are painful. XD

How dare he? He's clearly an OCTOPUS monster. LOL

I love that😄

It's a really fun game when you get into it. Great drinking game too

You should watch the first 3 pirates of the Caribbean movies. They are funny great adventure movies and one my favorite movie trilogies

@@therandomd2717 yeah and for dignity's sake forget the 4th and 5th movies

@@botesz20 what 4th and 5th movies?

@@therandomd2717 yeah my bad i was probably talking about die hard or smth

Thats more of a Barbosa move, tbh

@@shawnthompson2303 Agreed. Davy Jones was cruel and malicious, but he was honourable.

@@MCshadr217 True, and Jones had already put the real key into the pot by revealing it.

Barry Smith Makes sense. Now if Will wanted to somehow seize the real key by force, all the other fish orcs on board can make sashimi out of him. If he wins the game, he just might have that key.

i think he would have rather given him the key but have him stuck in the ship until next time they go on land, in 100 years xD

the music when he says it too

6:54

SE7EN FIVES5S5S5SS5S5S5S(ah) 🐙🏴‍☠️

@@shawnthompson2303 THAT is Bill Nighey right there 👌

Its a common bar game in Asia, like you can play bartenders for a free drink

i thought he already is, where else could he go

@@billytringuyen1 “A hundred years before the mast” is the standard bargain Jones makes to his victims. Without any other evidence, we can only presume that Bootstrap hadn’t added more years to his servitude before the game.

@@billytringuyen1 Well there's two things to add to that: First is that it was just 100 years at first. This means roughly another 70-80 years for him. Not nothing, but also not an eternity. The second is that in a cut scene, Will had already won his father's freedom, and the film never altered the following scene to make more sense. Him and Jones play two rounds. The first, he plays for his father's freedom and actually wins. Then Jones quits when Will challenges him for another round, this time for the key, saying that ''You can't beat the Devil twice, son.'' To which Will asks: ''Then why are you walking away?'' This prompts Jones' pride enough to put even the key to his chest on the line and play again. It also made Bootstrap's joining in even more sad, because he was already free. Just to spare his son he put his freedom on the line against an eternity of servitude, and when Jones corners Will, he steps up and takes the hit for him.

"Common to all forms of Liar's Dice is the rule that you can only call another player after they've made their move. Once the next player ups the stakes, all players have lost their chance to call out the previous bid." This is not true. Depending on the house rules, a player may call out MORE THAN ONE PLAYER'S bluff at the same time during his own turn, meaning Jones could have called BOTH their bluffs at the same time. This is a good way to prevent the situation in this scene, where your preceding player acts too quickly, leaving you no time to call out Will's bluff.

This would explains why Jones agrees to a 3 man game. He's not so dumb to realize he can only call out Bootstrap, and that Will is because his father cannot call him out. The interjection makes wayyyy more sense and hits harder as you can see Jones isn't just gloating his victory, he's actually about to call the game.

It is pretty much standard anywhere that lifting anybody's cup means you're calling his bluff

Otherwise it would not make any sense, because you can't use this information to your advantage. Imagine Bill had 5 fives and Davy Jones sees them, he either could abort the lying call and continue the game. The problem is that after his turn it's Wills call who now has the information of all cups, because by continuing Davy confirms his 4 fives. The other possible way for him would be to call Bill a liar anyways and hope that Will just got 2 fives. Lifting the cup while saying "li... argh nevermind" is a direct way to your own loss.

@@reptiloidmitglied2930 BOOSTRAP BILL YOU’RE A LIaaa... *sees 5 fives under Bootstrap’s cup* Likable man and you can have a nice day.

Hes got tentacles he could lash and grab it...as squids tend to be farily quick when they wanna be

It wouldn't happen because all the rolling goes on under the cups as they put the cups on the table the first time.

@@sebastianlastname5977 they mean if a bump happens and the cups get jerked

The dice are under the cup.

@@wiredforstereo the dice can still escape if someone gets hit and the cups fall Over because of a rocking big ass ship

Underrated comment

THIS IS THE TAAAAAALE! OF CAPTAIN JACK SPARRROWWWH!

@@MathewWWeaver A PIRATE SO BRAVE ON THE SEVEN SEEEEAAS!

@@8-bitsarda747 A MYSTICAL QUEST, TO THE ISLE OF TORTUGA

@@brennansmyth1100 What?!?. Lol Love that song.

I also liked the fourth one, I haven't seen the fifth one yet though.

@@krystencabbage1032 trust me if you like the movies so far, dont watch the fifth one

Same

Why would you be ashamed? They're great movies!

I watched this trilogy an unhealthy amount of times too.

Literally made me love the game.

Interestingly though, it had the 'Spot On' option in addition to the rules stated here. Having watched this video, I'm unsure how I feel about that rule now! Also would have changed the tactics too.

Best gambling mini-game in that game too

@@masterbaiter9856 Same. My favorite minigame. I still play it by RDR rules some times. And when it's 2 dice to 1, it is TENSE.

One of the highlights of that game’s side activities

I think the red dead version is the real version

Why would someone loose for guessing the exact ammount?

@@vittorio1159 No, The guy makes a bid, you declare it is spot-on, if you are right, he loses a die

@@vittorio1159 Basically think of it like it's Jones saying 7 fives to back Will into a corner. He has to up the bid or the face, or call Jones a liar. The spot on rule adds another option for Will to basically double down on Jones' bet. Will would win if he called 7 fives spot on. The risk of it comes from uncertainty, which there really was none of at that point in the game, but if Jones' bet had instead been 6 fives and Will called it spot on, Will would have lost. I've never played, but I assume this rule exists to get out of impossible situations like Will's, so that there's always still a chance to win.

@user-qk7to3jf1v iirc, there was a (flash?) game on the Dead Man's Chest website where you played that version of the game, minus the "spot on"

Not quite. In RDR, the option to declare a spot on works a bit different. First off, if the spot on is correct, everyone loses a die except the person who called the spot. Second, for a spot on to be correct, the number of dies a person calls must be completely correct. For example, if you call a spot-on on a four fives bid and it so happens that there are more than that amount in the game, the spot on is incorrect and you lose a die. That's why that move is called a spot on. Really risky move but with a big reward :D

@@releasethekraken5039 And in this case it would have been the right move.

In the version we played, "spot on" gives you a dice back.

If I remember correctly from the many years back, In the video game Pirates of the Carribean: At World's End (which covers the events of Dead Man's Chest as well) in the "Pirates Dice" mini-game you can declare "Equal" and if the previous person had the correct number of dice you just straight up win.

In my version you say « ride on » instead of spot on, and then if it was exactly the right amount, you gain a dice, if wrong you lose one

Not really.

@@bogzbiny Can you give a list of 21st century villains? I've been trying to think of some, but I don't really keep up with much entertainment.

2000's movies and other iconic culture moments: Spider-Man trilogy: due to the way comics works, the movies are legit new universes in a multiverse and get to count as new villains. I think Green Goblin wins at villainy because Doc Ock is too tragic and borders on anti villain/anti hero Star Wars movies: General Grievous, Count Dooku, Jango Fett, the Darth Jar-Jar theory are the big huge new ones that count as unique, as the Clones within 20 years are solid anti heroes or outright heroes and just as tragic as the Jedi. You also get Darth Malak, but not PC Darth Revan, PCs never count. Maybe Darth Traya counts but not Darth Nihilus (I'm being extremely strict at allowing people who don't have real movies to compete against the movies). Darth Bane and Maul count but Darth Bane isn't nearly as good as Darth Maul due to the need for a stirring visual performance not just a novelization. Out of all the Star Wars stuff, do your research and you have to give it to Christopher Lee, there's no excuses even for Darth Jar-Jar fans to sleep on Christopher Lee. Harry Potter: Tom Marvolo Riddle, Barty Crouch Jr, Severus Snape, Argus Filch (I mean this as a compliment. Damn good job at being scary the first couple movies), Quirinus Quirrel and all the Defense Professors pretty much.... Grindelwald, Queenie Werning (tragic but meaningful that she's gone to the Dark Side, and bears mentioning), I think you have to summarize Potter more tightly but Grindelwald, Voldemort, and Snape are a very good hot A-list. Bellatrix Lestrange has to be included. So we have so far: Bellatrix Lestrange Severus Snape Lord Voldemort Gellert Grindelwald East India Trading Company Davy Jones Captain Jack Sparrow Khan Darth Vader Sauron Frieza Loki Light Yagami Gollum Smaug (beats out basically any classic videogame dragon which covers most of a lot of things) Mewtwo Thief King Bakura Dark Master Zorc Yami Marik King Dartz and Ar-Pharazon tie exactly because duh. Ultron Thanos Doomsday Darkseid Witch-King of Angmar Saruman Count Dooku Green Goblin Sinestro (Geoff Johns) The Question Is: where does Davy Jones rate? Speaking of the Question Amanda Waller has to make the list and she's about 10 places higher than Dolores Umbrage. Trying to keep to a true honest highlights of the Top 50 while maintaining respectable standards. Mr. Freeze and Rita Repulsa can't come, sorry. (Mr. Freeze WOULD make it but we have Severus Snape for that now.)

Cutting all the Hitler-knockoffs out of the elimination round and anyone else less villainous than a fake Hitler we're left with: Davy Jones Sauron Loki Zorc Ultron Doomsday Vaatu from Avatar Legend of Korra First two I cross out are Zorc and Doomsday. Davy Jones - Water Satan Sauron - Fire Satan Loki - Air Satan I think Ultron - Metal/Earth Satan I cannot conscience eliminating Loki and I don't think Vaatu is the best either. I'm calling it a tie and Davy Jones would never be called less evil than anyone.

I meant to say Darkseid not Doomsday but still. My preference is to say Loki should win, but I can't prove it either, and Jones should remain in the Top 5 even if you listed 150 GOOD ones.

I mean as long as you throw out half the writing it works out well, lol

@@royce9018 Huh? What are you talking about?

While this is a fair point, throwing out that rule also kind of ruins the ending scene as well, since bill could have called Davy Jones a liar as soon as he said seven 5s, effectively stopping the game at that point. Heck, he could have called Jones a liar his first turn, which in that case would have made Bill win since Jones was bluffing, but who knows what the consequences of that would be. Either way, having the rule that anyone can call a liar would mean that Bill wouldn’t even need to play the game, he would just need to call out Jones at the best possible moment. It would make no sense on the other hand to wait for Will to make too high of a bid just for himself to up it to make him a liar.

@@andrewedmunds4583 Bill could've called Davy Jones a liar as soon as he said seven 5s. And he would've lost. Because there were seven 5s in the table. He couldn't have called Jones a liar from turn 1 because it would be a stupid risk to take. better to wait and get a better image of what kind of rolls everyone has.

@@vulpine3431 What risk? Bill was there with the sole purpose of loosing instead of Will. Calling Jones a liar at ANY point serves that goal, being called a liar by Jones at ANY point serves that goal... End the game without Will loosing

Pun appreciated

No don't die :(

You spent 15 years wondering how this game worked instead of just learning how it worked?

@@pajtimo23 The die is cast

@@nonnaurbisness3013 Just because you're wondering about something doesn't mean you can be bothered to look it up

this is just straight up wrong and against the rules. if you've ever played liar's dice then you'd know its an integral part of the game.

There is a interesting concept at second glance. Will could have called a "spot on" bet to win. At least in the rule book I saw.

@@TrekWarlord I wanna play this game some time and i have 2 questions: 1: So should you only be able to call somebody liar on your turn or not? 2: Who would start after somebody gets called out for lying? The liar, the person next to him, the guy who called out, the guy next to the one calling out? What if the calling out guy was wrong? Who would start then?

@@deedit4666 My family plays it like this: You start with 5 dice Oldest goes first, moving clockwise 1's are wild and count as 2 dice (so if you bid 2 2's, I could bid 1 1, if you bid 3 6's, I could bit 2 1's, if I bid 3 1's, you have to go higher than 6 dice, the idea being that since each number then has 1/3 chance of appearing, having a 1/6 would equate to 2 dice) Only the person after them can call them a liar, and it must be before they bid. After losing a bid, the person loses a dice and it is added to a pool in the center, changing the number of dice and making them less impactful in the game. Round then ends, reroll and start again, this time the person who lost a dice starts. When a person reaches 1 dice left, 1's are no longer wild for that round only, and only a single number can be bid (Say I start, and I say 2 3's, people can only raise the number of dice, the number on the dice must always be 3). When the round is over, the game returns to normal. If a player is eliminated (they run out of dice) the person to their right begins. It leads to longer games, good for family gatherings, but might not be the best 'competitively'.

@@deedit4666 1. You should only be able to call liar on YOUR turn, calling out the PREVIOUS player. Correct. 2. There's 2 possible methods. I used to play where the one who called liar would go first the next round. This works fine. Now, we play where the players going first merely rotates clockwise. So player A goes first, then player B goes first next round, then player C, etc.

I agree. There's aloooooot of crazy amazing scenes in dead man's chest .

UNLEASH THE KRAKEN!!!! !FOIRJRBTORNTBGXNDKSKRLXKXKNCCLKDKDLDKVKV

Finally somebody else who feels this way! It’s the best one hands down Davy Jones was an iconic villain and the cgi incredible

It would be if not for the drawn out fighting sequences that we all knew would go nowhere. This film had the best scenes of all five films, but also the most unnecessary filler. That native island, the 30 minute long fight between Norrington, Will, and Jack, and a few other things. If this film had better cutting/pacing, it would be the best. But in my opinion, as a total film At World's End takes it because every scene in the film is actually meaningful and goes somewhere.

Agreed