What (almost) everyone gets wrong about Antique Firearms…

  Рет қаралды 13,443

Triangle 26

Triangle 26

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 64
@Puppy_Puppington
@Puppy_Puppington Жыл бұрын
The government should have no say in our own private affairs, and what we do with our bodies and out private property as long as we don’t hurt anyone God dang it. The system is so broken.
@Triangle26
@Triangle26 Жыл бұрын
For sure. There are many complicated issues in this world, but individual liberty isn't one of them. Very simple.
@deker0954
@deker0954 3 ай бұрын
Nobody including your neighbors can keep their noses out of anyone's business. Government activities are a derivative of human behaviors.
@wiliamboyajian1192
@wiliamboyajian1192 2 ай бұрын
@@Triangle26it SOUNDS very simple, but it boils down to a timeless, Socratic question. What is good. “If we don’t hurt anyone” is a remarkably subjective statement. I wish we were doing better as a country socially/mentally where we didn’t have to do this, but CLEARLY we have to change something.
@user-sn7eu3xw7o
@user-sn7eu3xw7o 24 күн бұрын
@@Triangle26 Of course it is. Where you liberty ends and where my rights begin is a timeless question that every society, every person, every government has their own thoughts on. Guns are inherently dangerous. It's not like we're talking about the liberty to where a crop top in public or not.
@Triangle26
@Triangle26 24 күн бұрын
@@user-sn7eu3xw7oTechnically, guns are not *inherently* dangerous. They require extrinsic force or intention to cause harm, and are therefore *conditionally* dangerous. Examples of inherent dangers would be tsunamis or polar bears. They can produce harm without the external presence of malice, irresponsibility, or intent. That’s an important distinction. Another great example of an inherent danger is human beings, particularly males. Inarguably, one of the most destructive forces in nature is the human man. In fact, the conditional danger of firearms is quite clearly a *product* of the inherent danger of man. And yet, despite *your* inherent capacity for destruction, I don’t tell you how to live your life. You’ve never threatened, obstructed, stolen from, or harmed me. I have no reason to doubt that you are socialized and conscientious, so I don’t make your liberty my business. I instead choose to trust you, and I’d ask that you extend me the same courtesy. We can judge and regulate each other based not on our capabilities - but on how we use those capabilities. I think that’s pretty simple and reasonable.
@cheesenoodles8316
@cheesenoodles8316 Жыл бұрын
I learned this law at 18, a friend shoved an add for 1895 Brazilian Mausers in 7mm, said you need one. One check n copy of my DL later, a Mauser rifle was delivered.
@factorybear5264
@factorybear5264 2 жыл бұрын
Sucks that our Rossi Model 92 clones aren’t considered antique yet. Mine’s in 357 Magnum/.38 Special, yours in 44, and it’s all based on ammo production and availability rather than design patent. Uncle Sam’s mad complicated and open to so many interpretations, none of which are ever in our favor. So unnecessarily confusing too.
@Triangle26
@Triangle26 2 жыл бұрын
Exactly right. This is the same government that trusted me with a Polish AKM on my 18th birthday, but made me wait until I was 21 to buy a single action .22 LR revolver. How do you like your R92? Mine took a little work to smooth out, but once I got it dialed in - it’s an absolute blast at the range.
@factorybear5264
@factorybear5264 2 жыл бұрын
@@Triangle26 Mine was a killer on the range too, fresh out of the box in summer of 2020. Got it from a local mom and pops here Upstate New York and they had a 100 yard, outdoor range out back. I had a green box of the Remington jacketed round nose in .38 special, loaded up 11 rounds in the mag and was plinking the torso shaped steel plates out at 100 yards. I filmed the occasion. I got 9 out of 11 on steel. Ping! It was awesome. I was standing upright too. Not leaning on anything. Even had a couple of guys genuinely impressed and cheering me on. Such a workhorse. I made it my go to carbine on my property and woods, and even took some critters out with it at nice distances. I took it out again after watching your video just to see if it’s still on target and now it shoots high and right unfortunately. I blame the ergonomics of the rifle design, because as you’ve noticed, no matter how you lean or prop up the rifle, it always wants to rest on that front blade sight. It’s so susceptible to knocks too, and it tends to hook on things like car seats and clothing. I wish someone made a front sight hood for it already. It would be a big aftermarket seller, I’m sure. Now I have no idea how to finagle it back to zero. So bummed.
@andrewgates8158
@andrewgates8158 6 ай бұрын
It's based on year of reciever manufacture
@kenibnanak5554
@kenibnanak5554 2 ай бұрын
Yep. My Martini Henry rifle happily was an antique under both laws, then some folks began offering newly made ammunition in caliber .577-450. Sigh. But then my Colt Single Action Army, Model of 1873, made in 1880 in caliber .45 Colt has always had that problem..
@chuckfischer7202
@chuckfischer7202 2 ай бұрын
Good explanation. I'm still confused. These days, most ammo is foreign made. No cartridge is readily available from US manufacturers.
@treyriver5676
@treyriver5676 2 ай бұрын
The key (unconditional) CGA 1968 seems to be "(16)The term “antique firearm” means- (A)any firearm (including any firearm with a matchlock, flintlock, percussion cap, or similar type of ignition system) manufactured in or before 1898; or" So if its made on or before 12-31-1898 it is an Antique. I will add that the ATF allows for some weapons that the date of mfg is in question to be assumed pre 1899 but not all.. 1886 Label comes to mind as some MAY have been made during the great war but 2.3 million existed before 1898 mine is an 1886/93/R35 The replica issue is where things go wonky.. (B)any replica of any firearm described in subparagraph (A) if such replica- (i)is not designed or redesigned for using rimfire or conventional centerfire fixed ammunition, or (ii)uses rimfire or conventional centerfire fixed ammunition which is no longer manufactured in the United States and which is not readily available in the ordinary channels of commercial trade; or (C)any muzzle loading rifle, muzzle loading shotgun, or muzzle loading pistol, which is designed to use black powder, or a black powder substitute, and which cannot use fixed ammunition. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term “antique firearm” shall not include any weapon which incorporates a firearm frame or receiver, any firearm which is converted into a muzzle loading weapon, or any muzzle loading weapon which can be readily converted to fire fixed ammunition by replacing the barrel, bolt, breechblock, or any combination thereof. Note with care the list "readily converted to fire fixed ammunition by replacing the barrel, bolt, breechblock, or any combination thereof." This list does not include cylinders thus the .45 colt cyl. for STEEL B.P. Revolvers
@daggerg8451
@daggerg8451 2 жыл бұрын
This is very true with flintlocks they have a reputation for having a very long delay they don’t if you do it right
@jamesvatter5729
@jamesvatter5729 8 ай бұрын
Good explanation. I had to research this when considering an 1873 trapdoor rifle.
@PeterMinoz-px3kx
@PeterMinoz-px3kx Ай бұрын
I have a 1860 Navy arms Henry rifle. It is .44-40 caliber and I reload them and shoot with BP. The ammo is difficult to find but is out there.
@SasquatchMushrooms
@SasquatchMushrooms Жыл бұрын
You rock at explaining things! Thank you!
@wtfwebster3424
@wtfwebster3424 2 ай бұрын
So are we saying there is rpgs that are technically antiques
@factorybear5264
@factorybear5264 2 жыл бұрын
Oh hell yeah, my most favorite channel just posted a new video!
@Triangle26
@Triangle26 2 жыл бұрын
Oh hell yeah, my favorite KZfaq user just posted a comment on my new video!
@factorybear5264
@factorybear5264 2 жыл бұрын
My brother!
@Qwijebo
@Qwijebo 9 ай бұрын
In Canada, land of no handguns allowed, antique firearms are readily available, but are so overpriced it's insane. And you don't need a license to own one or use it, if you can at an approved range that is. Ammo for these antiques is easy to come by, however it's very pricy and not always worth it.
@ChrisPBacon1434
@ChrisPBacon1434 7 ай бұрын
You can always make ur own ammo like Mel Gibson in the movie: The Patriot. Like that scene where he is over the campfire, creating new musket balls from the lead soldier figurines from his dead son. (Im American and don't really know Canadian laws that good, so it is just an idea idfk lol)
@coltguy32
@coltguy32 3 ай бұрын
Antique guns in Canada are able to be discharged anywhere that it's permitted to discharge a firearm, ie the woods
@outinthesticks1035
@outinthesticks1035 Ай бұрын
It's crazy how firearms have jumped in price in Canada . Not so long ago lee-enfields were 14.95 , 98 Mauser 29.95 . Cooey .22 10$ , anschutz .22 15 $ 10 years back I got a 6.5x55 in like new for 125 I lament the day tradex closed , good rifles , fair price
@drerod89
@drerod89 Жыл бұрын
Do you think replica cap and ball revolvers could be considered firearms because they’re readily convertible (or whatever terminology was used) to fire cartridges? From what I remember the law says readily convertible means by changing the barrel, but basically every replica revolver you can buy has a plug and play conversion cylinder available. Most states that require a CCW have laws against carrying antique firearms or purchasing ammunition, but if a prohibited/unlicensed person was carrying even a non converted replica antique revolver it wouldn’t be a far stretch to consider that a firearm and in the process have cap and ball replicas be subject to the GCA. Quite a few people on KZfaq are more or less encouraging felons to carry antique revolvers, and I have a feeling that is going to put the kibosh on this whole antique firearms thing one of these days
@Triangle26
@Triangle26 Жыл бұрын
Very interesting thoughts. Short answer, *replica* cap and ball revolvers cannot be considered firearms because they are not subject to the “readily convertible” clause you mentioned. While you are correct that cap and ball revolvers can indeed be readily converted to fire fixed ammunition by means of a cylinder swap (which does mean the ATF definition of a “breechblock replacement”), that restriction *exclusively* applies to firearms covered by subparagraph (C). Replica firearms achieve antique status in subparagraph (B), and are therefor not subject to that standard. *Non-replica* cap and ball revolvers however, such as the Ruger Old Army, would legally be considered firearms - so long as it could be proven that drop-in conversion cylinders were readily available. I don’t personally see the ATF ever coming for antiques. They’ve got their hands full with 80% frames, pistol braces, and rate increasing triggers. I don’t think it’s in their interest to open a new front coming after single action revolvers.
@andrewgates8158
@andrewgates8158 6 ай бұрын
🤐
@williamwang5575
@williamwang5575 Жыл бұрын
that revolver is more like a revolver from Ming Dynasty
@samcolt1079
@samcolt1079 7 ай бұрын
WRONG
@carlcox7332
@carlcox7332 3 ай бұрын
Um. No. It's literally from the American civil war. Made by Samuel colt, an american gun maker
@carlcox7332
@carlcox7332 3 ай бұрын
So your a couple hundred years and half of the planet off
@williamwang5575
@williamwang5575 3 ай бұрын
@@carlcox7332I don’t have one
@gastrofile
@gastrofile Жыл бұрын
So, as I understand what you've said, if my Swedish rolling block, chambered in 8x58R Danish, were a replica it would still be an "antique" because factory ammo is practically non-existent (I think Buffalo Arms makes a limited quantity, an no one else). Is that correct?
@Triangle26
@Triangle26 Жыл бұрын
That’s half correct. A replica of your Swedish Rolling Block chambered in 8x58R *would* be an Antique according to the Gun Control Act of 1968, but *would not* be an Antique according to the National Firearms Act of 1934. In other words, it’s Antique status is dependent on the legal context. Such a rifle could be legally mailed across State lines to a non-FFL, because *in that context* it is an Antique. Such a rifle could not have its barrel cut down below the NFA limit (16”) because *in that context* it is not an Antique.
@gastrofile
@gastrofile Жыл бұрын
@@Triangle26 thank you for clearing that up.
@carolhagen7923
@carolhagen7923 11 ай бұрын
I have 2 old pistols, that appear to be pre 1898 and use black powder cartridges. I am waiting on an age estimate for an Iver Johnson, 5 shot, last Patent date of Aug 25, 96. The other is a H&R 2nd model 2nd variation (Oct 4th 1887) 6 shot, 32 cal S&W, that I've been told was made in 1890-1892. I would like to gift them to a family member who lives in another state. In your opinion, does the transfer need to go through an FFL dealer?
@Triangle26
@Triangle26 11 ай бұрын
I'm not an expert on Iver Johnson revolvers unfortunately, and the ten minutes of research I was willing to put into it didn't give me confidence one way or the other. The best I can offer you is this: If you can determine beyond a reasonable doubt that the revolvers were manufactured prior to January 1st 1898, you can proceed with full confidence without going through an FFL. The 1968 Gun Control Act is very clear about this. If you cannot determine date of manufacture beyond a reasonable doubt, my personal advice would be to air on the side of caution and treat them like modern firearms.
@carolhagen7923
@carolhagen7923 11 ай бұрын
@@Triangle26 Thanks for your advice! I have found the gun laws to be a little confusing, and was feeling like it would be best to go through an FFL. The person who identified the age of the H&R didn't want to say either way, as that's not their expertise.
@Wachuma-icp99
@Wachuma-icp99 5 ай бұрын
You don't need to go through an FFL unless the state laws require it
@victorracel4140
@victorracel4140 2 жыл бұрын
Alright now kidding how is that Rossi?
@richardtaylor9227
@richardtaylor9227 8 ай бұрын
So, the safest way to own firearms is to buy replicas of black powder arms. Gotcha. 👍👌
@hoosierbuy
@hoosierbuy 6 ай бұрын
Who is making pre 1898 cartridges that you speak of, remember, pre 1898 will be black powder... and I can't name US cartridge manufactures making black powder ammo.......
@Triangle26
@Triangle26 6 ай бұрын
7.65x53 Mauser, 1889. 6.5x52 Carcano, 1889. 7.62x54 Rimmed, 1891. 30-40 Krag, 1892. 7x57 Mauser, 1892. 6.5x55 Swedish, 1894. 30-30 Winchester, 1895. .38 Special, 1898. Smokeless powder was invented in 1884. Pre ‘99 *does not* mean black powder. I thought I gave quite a few pretty clear examples of that in this video.
@hoosierbuy
@hoosierbuy 6 ай бұрын
@@Triangle26 I'm not an expert but I do know the original .38 S&W Special was originally black powder. The point is, a LOT of what dates pre-1899 IS black powder - they are not rated for the more powerful smokeless, therefore ammo for them is not commercially made in the USA. I did not look up every firearm you mentioned, nor do I remember hearing you mention black powder at all.
@andrewb2111
@andrewb2111 4 ай бұрын
I believe the cartridges you are referring to are of the hand-made paper type. Would have commonly been carried by soldiers and likely made the night before. They made reloading the 1858 Remington New Army a breeze compared to measuring powder for each cylinder.
@victorracel4140
@victorracel4140 2 жыл бұрын
Lol “golf” we get it you’re in the coast guard
@Triangle26
@Triangle26 2 жыл бұрын
How dare you, I work for a living. Although let’s be honest, both of us definitely should have joined the Coast Guard.
@The1saturn
@The1saturn 5 ай бұрын
it comes down to you can own it till you get caught with it and after yo get caught with it you can no longer own it
@jimcramton
@jimcramton Жыл бұрын
Is this video a deepfake? There's something that looks weird about it.
@Triangle26
@Triangle26 Жыл бұрын
iPhone “Cinematic” mode. I agree it looks weird, and have since stopped using it.
@air-1579
@air-1579 9 ай бұрын
As a FELON for alcohol DUI, I sold off my arsenal ,now I own another of PRE 99 that is much more effective and gratifying' and not as expansive as people believe. Just buy a good old Gun
@victorracel4140
@victorracel4140 2 жыл бұрын
You were manufactured before 1899
@victorracel4140
@victorracel4140 2 жыл бұрын
What’s your OnlyFans?
@victorracel4140
@victorracel4140 2 жыл бұрын
You’re an antique
The Hunt for Old Guns: Who Collects Old Guns and Why?
5:49
How Rare is my SKS?
29:46
Triangle 26
Рет қаралды 13 М.
That's how money comes into our family
00:14
Mamasoboliha
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Looks realistic #tiktok
00:22
Анастасия Тарасова
Рет қаралды 47 МЛН
Osman Kalyoncu Sonu Üzücü Saddest Videos Dream Engine 170 #shorts
00:27
Double Action Revolvers on the Frontier
3:58
Arizona Ghostriders
Рет қаралды 98 М.
How 922(r) Affects SKS Owners
18:17
Triangle 26
Рет қаралды 7 М.
"French Tickler" Chinese SKS
21:27
Triangle 26
Рет қаралды 12 М.
SKS Stripper Clips
19:29
Triangle 26
Рет қаралды 9 М.
The Best Handgun Caliber - A Real World Study
11:34
Rational Preps
Рет қаралды 3,8 МЛН
The Earliest Chinese SKS
25:28
Triangle 26
Рет қаралды 9 М.
“Public Security” SKS
33:50
Triangle 26
Рет қаралды 5 М.
SKS Cleaning
30:32
Triangle 26
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Mission Success #funny #shorts #comedy
0:12
BD Vibes
Рет қаралды 41 МЛН
САМЫЙ ЖАРКИЙ ШТАТ (@therealoscarmendez - TT)
0:23
В ТРЕНДЕ
Рет қаралды 3 МЛН
Мальчик помог мужчине спастись 🤯
0:50
Фильмы I Сериалы
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
Гениальный План Хвостатых 😂
0:28
ДоброShorts
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН