Amen!!! Thank you for commenting this.

Good news version is good

​@@definitionhighguyNIV much stronger on the deity of Christ and the Holy Spirit than the KJV. God had truly blessed it and is using it to bring many to Christ. I do not trust anybody who is KJV only

@@Sam-tk6usabsolutely

Apart from the fact we're talking about the best Bible in English. He's talking about Idioms, that's hardly news.

The actual "role" of thousands (yes, it's thousands) of translations is to confuse the body. Satan is the author of confusion. Different words mean different things. A child understands that concept. You will be misleading your flock.....be careful, your judgment will be more strict being you are preaching. This man's explanations are hogwash. smh

There is not a power that is not given by God. Through providence God raised up the most powerful nation there ever was or will be, the U.S.A., and in its infancy it was given the preserved word of God; “Robert Aitken, a Philadelphia printer, was the first to publish the first American edition of the K.J.V. New Testament in 1781 and the K.J.V. Old Testament in 1782, omitting the Apocrypha. On completion, he petitioned and received from the Congress of the Confederation, an official endorsement that Aitken added to the binding of his Bibles, to assure colonists that they were buying a non-royalist edition: “Resolved, that the United States in Congress assembled… recommend this edition of the Bible to the inhabitants of the United States and hereby authorize him to publish this recommendation.” As a result, the Aitken Bible is often referred to as “The Bible of the Revolution.” The nation was given the KJV, not the dead sea scrolls, not the book of Enoch, not Hebrew books etc. but only the KJV. If God wanted us to understand his word in Hebrew he would have raised this nation up speaking Hebrew. Back in the 1600’s God saw to it that the certain scriptures were translated into English “KJ bible” and was put into print so that all could read for themselves the truth that is in the scriptures. God did this because he knew that he would bring about this powerful nation [U.S.A. and the English language] of ours to lead the world. The scriptures were written by apostles and prophets inspired by God through the Holy Ghost. The compilation and translation to English was also done by the direction of God through the Holy Ghost and he did not make any mistakes, i.e., the fourth horse being “pale” was no mistake, the horse is not green. In Greek mythology, the name Chloris (Khloris Χλωρίς, from khloros χλωρός, meaning "greenish-yellow," "pale green," "pale," "pallid" or "fresh") appears... Pallid 1. pale; faint or deficient in color; wan: a pallid countenance. People say that they believe that scripture was written by the direction of God and the Holy Ghost, which is true. But what you people don’t seem to realize is that the compilation and translation of the bible (KJV) was also done by the direction of God and the Holy Ghost. If the bible was written and compiled by men of opinion and perspective and translated by incompetent translators then you might as well throw it in the trash. The prophets were told what to write and how to write it. The nation was given the symbol of the Eagle, 37 … Wheresoever the body is, thither will the eagles be gathered together. Luke 17:37 (KJV), the body being the church, the body of Christ. The nation has the motto and preamble “in God we trust” and “one nation under God”. This greatest and most powerful nation. the U.S.A., has been given the last and best chance to lead the world to heaven on earth or destruction. But like all other nations of power before it (symbolic Israels) the U.S. has chosen destruction and is now the great “liar” saying “in God we trust” and “one nation under God”, it is now the conglomerate of the dragon, beast, false prophet, and harlot, it is Satan loosed from the pit, 7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, 8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth Rev 20:7-8 (KJV). And yet no one seems to know of or speak of a very clear fulfillment of prophecy in our recent history. We (U.S.A.) are the ones who brought down fire from heaven in Aug. of 1945 and we are the ones that gave life to the image of the beast in May of 1948. Rev 13:13-15 (KJV). May God have mercy on his children. Amen

I'm surprised that ESV is slightly less formal equivalent than the NASB, I thought they were about both equal in scale to formal equivalency. Anyway, ESV is probably the most formal equivalent along the scale I'd be most willing to go. I'm more used to the NIV and NLT isn't that bad either.

ESV

All the translations you mention all-conference the alexandrian text filled with errors it should be the Dead Sea Scrolls

The Bible should be one way there's only one Bible yet we have multiple definitions for it you're no different than the Jehovah's Witness

Oh no, those versions take out entire verses out to make people feel better. Pray about it, but I gotta say stay away from those versions. KJV most closely shows us God's standard, though people don't like it because it doesn't mince words of judgement and holiness.

You determine their reading level ?

.....well said. You can pretty much tell what person is asking. So i understand how you gauge the Bible to recommend. I myself read the KJV, but i didnt start with that version. Ive had most versions in the book stores, but felt God leading me slowly out of them.

check out the NET, its a really good version. if you have the YouVersion Bible app on your phone the NET Bible has the translator notes included which are extremely helpful

@@thehulk2320 what if someone can not understand that translation no matter how hard they tried? Should that person just not read scripture since the others are..."flawed"?

@@thehulk2320 we'll just agree to disagree. Not everyone is the same. We're all unique and can't all understand the way it is written. I, as well as millions of others, have grown in our faith and walk with Yeshua reading the other translations. I, myself, have honestly tried to read it but can not understand it and that's ok. We shouldn't pressure other brothers and sisters to read certain translations and stop reading the ones they're in if they're growing and being spiritually fed. Much love and God bless!

do you use NET?

Good day! Have you found the translation that you like? If not, please tell me so I can give you some personal advice. Thanks!

@@patricks.1566 Hi I've been trying to find one that I like my main two right now are kjv and nasb but I can't really pick one

@@Xero488 pick kjv for a more beautiful literature based wording

Whatever you do Rhonda don't listen to Kevin belgrove he has a very hot afterlife coming

Nasb 1995 is a good translation and kjv is also

+Jerry Hutcheson Welcome to our channel, thanks for subscribing! Not sure if you've seen them yet, but we have already released 40 more episodes. You can see them all on the "Honest Answers" playlist here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jbCDncp7np-8gGw.html Honest Answers is released every Wednesday morning at 8am EST. We hope you continue to enjoy and follow the series!

Southern Seminary looking through them right now

The ESV has missing verses and twists scriptures...It's not of God.

Copy John 5:4 WORD FOR WORD from your ESV.

@@drtruthseeker8400 I’ve seen this In many translations. Can you please advise on what version I should read. KJV is hard to read but I’m willing to do it if it’s the only true word of God.

@@aCesllllllJefrre there’s not Missing verses this guy is a KJV onlist spewing hatred against other translations... ESV uses a different set of manuscripts that date back closer to the time of Christ they are reliable they didn’t purposely remove verses the Greek manuscripts they get there stuff from didn’t have them... and either way they tell you what it is in the footnotes they don’t hide anything... and the differences don’t affect Christian essential doctrines at all and they are bare minimal the ESV is a great translation.

@@drtruthseeker8400 Amen brother every single modern version after the KJV does this but people don't want to understand that because they want to believe their satanic trash book and their satanic trash denominations and they think that they're saved....lol if it ain't the KJV then it's up Satan and the Catholic Church...

Translators ....obviously . Just like when we say "what's up" in English , it is translated as "casual greetings" in another language .

Roon Bare are translators inspired? All of them? If only certain ones can you tell me which ones and explain why they are inspired. Obviously translators are biased is the correct answer.

@@55dengen , I think you must study this for yourself and decide which type of translation works best for you. For example , in Genesis during the story of Noah, a literal translation will read something like "Ham saw his fathers nakedness ." An accurate translation will correctly change the idiom to common parlance thus , " Ham lay with his father's wife." Both may also include footnotes as to the other. I find the NKJV has the most useful and complete footnotes, as it annotates all variations , and italics all addition flow conjunctions (in the most recent additions). It also is not biased towards reform or Orthodox , so doesn't stress one footnote over another. ... In short, the inspiration comes from within you. I'd posit that most people today have a poor grasp on ancient idiomatic expression , or Elizabethan expression, as such; either the NKJV or the ESV are best for them. The NKJV for complete footnotes , and the ESV for ease of reading.

@@55dengen furthermore if you don't trust translators you can compare parallel bible passages across versions (logos software is great for this) or you can learn ancient Greek and Hebrew to translate yourself . Most of the original manuscripts are scanned online at the library of congress website (several thousand ) .

True that. Any time you translate from one language into another some meaning is lost in translation, some beauty, idioms, humor, sarcasm, etc. And when it's translation of an ancient language into a modern one, hoo-boy can you have difficulty!

+@dakotabillyone It's good for extra explanations and understanding. However ti doesn't flow and isn't good for building up your spirit and the constant interruption jars the soul. 1 Peter 2:2 .. "as newborn babes, desire the pure milk of the word, that you may grow thereby," If you've ever watched an infant nursing, you'll soon realise that it is better that the baby isn't interrupted with the flow of milk from it's mother's breast. If the mother was getting up and down to do other things the baby wouldn't receive it's proper nourishment. It's important to build up our spirits and you do this by quietly reading and absorbing huge uninterrupted portions of scripture. Most Christians today build up their minds but their spirits are shrivelled and dead. Listening to constant sermons will also do this to you. It's just one brain passing head knowledge to another person. John 6:63 "It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing..." Jesus The NKJV is the best version available today

This is accurate about the CSB. It uses optimal equivalence as it's translation basis. I prefer it my self along with the NASB95 a close second.

it would be further to the left than NASB

www.av1611.org/nkjv.html

www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/New%20King%20James%20Bible/nkjv-deadly.htm

+ArunPlaysPiano Those were 3 of the 4 translations that Dr. Plummer mentioned in the video! So great choices!

@@SouthernSeminary He doesn't mention which translation is superior to the NWT!

He is the Word made flesh

Ive been researching this subject for a while and honestly there is no answer to this question, other than a personal preference.

no it is not personal preference the KJV is the only perfect word of God that you can get your hands on today that does not change the deity of Christ if one studies all versions after the KJV change the deity of Christ showing that they are satanic pieces of trash. images.app.goo.gl/U1kU6DBGfKv58Hn39 There is one proof have fun finding the rest on ur own depending on what satanic new version you choose......

Hey man, I would use the KJV, NKJV, NIV, ESV, NLT, or NASB. These are what are used by the men who teach sound, biblically accurate doctrine. I am praying that the Lord will guard you from deception. Also, freemasons did not translate the bible, that is a foolish conspiracy theory that you are to avoid (Titus 3:9). In fact, freemasons don't even believe in anything that the Bible teaches, so how is it possible that they translated it? Listen to the voice of the Lord in scripture. God does not call us to be 4-language-speaking, PHD, Theology degree professors; He wants us to listen to His voice through His word, and become more Christ-like. But as Paul says in Titus 3:9, avoid these things. Furthermore, I hope you can trust the Lord when He says, "Heaven and earth may pass away, but my words will never pass away" (Matthew 24:35). "The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God will stand forever." (Isaiah 40:8). And if you want evidence, it has stood for thousands of years, and it will stand for all eternity. God bless you and guard you keep you forever (Jude 1:24-25). Amen.

@@readromanschp3-825 Thank you, I'll be getting ESV version.

No such thing as most accurate. It assumes that you can perfectly translate every word into another language correctly. But that’s not possible. Best is to learn the original languages of a text for yourself. Then you’ll be better prepared to understand it.

The major difference are that some translations are more literal (word for word) and other translations paraphrase more.

The King James is the Authorized version, the only one that kept what God said.

@@drtruthseeker8400 KJV is the accurate version

@@drtruthseeker8400 what if you don't understand that translation? Do you just not read the other translations because the others are... "flawed"?

@@user-jj06j what if you don't understand that translation? Does one just not read the Bible because the others are... "flawed"?

@@drtruthseeker8400 that’s categorically false. Stop spreading new age cult ideologies.

@Moshe’s Corner• That's how I do a lot of my personal study. :)

Hi Kevin, fancy meeting you here! You probably don't even remember me. We were on the Doulos together. I'm a friend of Daniel Critchlow who might remember better. :-)

LOL. love it!

As examples, 1 John 5:7,8, also 1 Tim 3:16. Readers may not be aware of the history behind 1 John 5:7, 8, as the words "the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost" were invented by a Catholic scribe, a monk named Roy, Erasmus in his Greek translation did not insert the above words, as none of the manuscripts he used had the above in and only agreed to insert the words, if a manuscript could be found with it in, "Roy" obliged and manufactured one and then it was presented to Erasmus, who was obliged to put the above in his next edition! No manuscript before the 16th century CE has the above in; had the church fathers been aware of it, they surely would have used it as a proof text in the Christological debates, at Nicaea... and none of them show any awareness of such a text and non of them mention it in their writings!

I ask all reading this to get your bible and look up scripture PSLAMS 83:18. It is the 19th book of old test the front of your bible should show you the page number.

God is three in one. God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. This is shown throughout the whole Bible, God says "let Us make man in Our image" when He makes Adam. He said "let Us confuse their tongues" when He confused their tongues at the tower of Babel. It is shown also in John 1:1-3 when the Word tells us "1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing * came into being that has come into being." Word being capitalized is speaking of Jesus. We see here that Jesus wasn't just made when He took on flesh but that He always existed as God and created all things as God. I'm not sure on how much you know of the Holy Trinity, I hope that helped some but I'm sure they can make a good vid on it =)

Completely Butchered!

@@kingston163 What people used before?

@@kingston163 doubt.

Do any of these translations restore the Tetragram to their OTs, if not, they have nearly 7,000 error in them, because, that is the amount of times the Tetragram appears in the original Hebrew and it is to be seen in several Greek OT LXXs, some of these Greek OT LXXs having the equivalent translation "IAO" instead of "YHWH"! Ex 9:16; Ps 83:18 ASV

@@andrewgraham6496 I also use different versions and compare including ESV, NIV and NLT too. Check out the NET too, its a really good version. if you have the YouVersion Bible app on your phone the NET Bible has the translator notes included which are extremely helpful. Its my go-to version now.

You are so right about that. I know so many people who stand firmly on KJ but have no idea what it says or means.

James Gossweiler you know the based on opinion. The key is to know the Bible. If you know the Bible the translation makes no different..

images.app.goo.gl/U1kU6DBGfKv58Hn39 this verse above proves the NIV is satanic because obviously it changes the deity of Christ just like every other version of the Bible you said was good they are all satanic and tools of Satan. The KJV is the only perfect word of God that does not teach false salvations or changes the deity of Christ.

The KJV was good for its day as it was a translation made for the ear, not accuracy! The KJV has one definite error and several transcription errors, its translators had only a handful of extant Hebrew and Greek manuscripts to go on and the KJV has several spurious texts ex: 1 Tim 3:16; 1 John 5:7; Rev 1:11...). Much of the language and expressions used in the KJV is out date and obsolete, some words have the opposite meaning today!

Throw them in the garbage and get your self a good old King James Bible

@@pcmasterrace3596 I started reading the KJV 40 years ago. Then, I started studying enough Hebrew to get by and realized how many errors are in the KJV. I'm good with what I'm using now. Thanks.

This is what I use, I've been taught that it is the best, because it's word for word in regular English language we use today (without all the "thee and thous"). I went further and got a Hebrew\Greek Keyword Study Bible. Very good. I'm with u tho on the NASB. God bless

No sir you are wrong the KJV is the only perfect word of God that we can get our hands on today commonly. All other versions after the KJV are corrupt pieces of satanic trash. It's that simple just go study one we'll see. Until then here's one piece of proof for you. images.app.goo.gl/U1kU6DBGfKv58Hn39

Formally - RVR (In the middle) - NVI Functionally - NTV Le recomiendo también la LBLA.

Reina Valera 1960

It's the best of the "NEW" versions, but still does not fully contain what God said like the KJB does.

Ma'am if you google emblem for nkjv ,that alone should tell you alot about that bible.stay w kjv1611

I don’t trust the Scriptures by ISR. For numerous reasons. I suspect they took a public domain translation like the KJV, the ASV, or the older JPS from 1917 among others and paraphrased it instead.

Huge difference!

@@d33bo67 Yeah. It doesn't mean "I'm glad you're here". It does mean "Did you eat?", but it is really meant to show concern for a person's physical wellbeing (like "Are you doing well?"), which comes from a time when it was a valid question to ask in the midst of the food shortages and poverty in China. If I haven't eaten, I just say "Hai Meiyou" ("not yet"). They are puzzled to hear anything in response except "Yes".

I agree with you here.

NKLV and KLV- many verses OMITTED( not recommended)

@@marciecorda5209 I guess you mean KJV/NKJV? I've heard some ppl say they ADDED versus, whereas the other MVs omitted them. Depends on if you believe the Critical Text, or the Majority Text. I do lean towards the Majority Text myself ( N.T. )

Mark OnTheBlueRidge, I personally prefer the KJV because that is the bible I know and have studied for many years. Plus, I think the translators of the new bible versions are lacking in knowledge and spirituality.

Mark OnTheBlueRidge, thanks for your comment.

Not all questions in truth have a definitive answer.

@@mariantarchynets3454 Corresponding to biblical matters, I think it does. Our spiritual wellness is imperative.

Why do you need a pastor to do it? That's why a lot of these false teachers have a huge followin. People don't know the Word for themselves 😔 15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. 2 Timothy 2:15

@@jakeweesner9168 You get to know the word for yourself through perseverance and praying you find a good pastor to feed you with what is needed to be understood. God gives the gift of pastor-teacher for good reason. James 3:1 tells us that a few good teachers will be among us. In contrast, 2 Timothy 4:3 tells us that many bad teachers will be found for whatever pleases your personal bias. There is so much that remains hidden when someone reads and English translation. Its good for baby Christians just learning the very basics. Too much remains unexplained to give us context. Those led of the Spirit will endure and suffer and finally locate what is needed as God provides through a genuine pastor-teacher. And, those who prefer the mainstream? They will find the really good teachers to be offensive. For the flesh opposes the Spirit, and the Spirit opposes the flesh. Just like false teachers are offensive. That way everyone is free to decide for themselves. That is why we will all answer to the Lord and be without excuse.

@@genez429 I know what the Bible says. I read it daily. I don't need to rely on a pastor 🙂

@@jakeweesner9168 If you found a good one you would drop your substitute. Though I do agree.. most pastors today are weak.

@@genez429 What substitute? I read the Bible under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. There's no better Teacher than Him.

Same here

You are correct about the ASV-1901. It was/is legendary attempt to be as close to a "word for word" (formal) translation as we have had in English. It is extremely accurate. It uses archaic Elizabethan English, nevertheless, it has no modern equal.

Grew up with the KJV. One of the least recommended for me. Best to learn the source language of the text if you can. As long as people rely on translations only they will always be totally reliant on people they don’t even know to tell them what the Bible says.

100%

Which greek? Which hebrew?? When someone says what you did, I know for a FACT they don't know what in the world they speak of.

Wayne Hampson Which Greek or Hebrew? There are many!

@@filoIII which are the best?

@@barmstrong25 which are the best?

There are no little "nuggets" to be learned from the "best" greek, or the "best" hebrew. The english language of the King James Bible is a special language that lines up w/ the proper hebrew and greek manuscripts, which are different than from where the modern "per"versions come from, btw. People in the 1600s did not speak english as found in the 1611 KJB.

Ask them which version of the KJV is the only accurate and right English translation. There were several versions printed in England in the centuries following its publication. They might not know this and at least you have planted a little seed of doubt which might lead them to investigate further.

"Those religion"? Oh, you mean Christians? Tell them to keep using the KJV.

I'd want to know where in the scripture that is written

@@jjpower6769 Why don't you investigate further. Realising firstly that there is only 1 kjv there have been a few revisions but only one version.

@@1badplayer how can such a perfect translation need to be revised?

Garbage. KJV only

We don't believe him! We don't need his heretical Critical text per-versions☝️ Brothers, read Tyndale' Bible, KJV and Septuagint Brenton in English. They're truthful...

Helen, Hebrew Masoretic text WAS MADE in X CE... Pay attention on Septuagint (translated from the Hebrew OT in III-II BC☝️. It is the Bible of Early Christians.

Lexham does a good translation of the Septuagint (I don’t recommend apocrypha).

@@syriacchristianity9007 Bro, never mess with stupid gender language. Lexham has it. Septuagint, Brenton's translation (1851) is good, trustworthy and classical, for real Christians and for REAL MEN... Watch and check what you are going to buy, brother. ~99% of modern Bible translations are not good... Ask WHY? ☝️

Words may be changed but not doctrine. I've been using NASB, NKJV among others and have never seen anything that would change doctrine and I believe in the fundamentals of the faith.

@@debbiehines6803 Acts 8:37 is often times taken out. In some Bibles, it even changes virgin to maiden when talking about the virgin birth in Isaiah. So, yes, eventually when you start changing words and taking out verses, it can change doctrine.

+Shae Tallent Thanks for your encouragement! We will keep them coming. Thanks for watching and following "Honest Answers"!

Stick with it as long as you understand it.

Found Sheep Thank you ,I will and have no problem at all understanding it.

The KJV is not a perfect translation. It has many errors: 1. KJV: "robbers of churches." Acts 19:37 Greek: HIEROSULOUS, "robbers of temples" 2. KJV: "Lucifer" Is 14:12 Hebrew: "O Day Star" (Lucifer is a human origin nickname for the Devil in the 1600's refers not to the devil but the king of Babylon) 3. KJV: "Easter" Acts 12:4 "Passover" 4. KJV: "Tithes of all I possess" Lk 18:12 Greek: "all I acquire" 5. KJV: "Schoolmaster" Gal 3:24 Greek: "attendant" (the law was the one who brought us to Christ, not taught us about Christ) 6. KJV: "God save the King": 1Sam 10:24, 2Sam 16:16, 1Kings 1:25 Hebrew: "May the king live" ( reflects the British culture of the 1600's. Proof that the translators used dynamic equivalents.) 7. KJV: "God Forbid." Ro. 3:4,6,31; 6:2,15; 7:7,13; 9:14; 11:1,11; 1 Co. 6:15; Ga. 2:17; 3:21; 6:14 Greek: "may it not be" or "let it not be." (KJV adds the word God where it is absent in the TR because it was a common expression in 1600's. Proof that the translators used dynamic equivalents.) 8. KJV: "sweet savour" Lev 6:21; 8:28; 17:6; 23:18 Hebrew: "soothing aroma" (KJV appeals to wrong senses- taste instead of smell in the TR) 9. KJV: "ashes upon his face" 1 Kings 20:38 Hebrew: "bandage over his eyes" (KJV varies from TR by using ashes)

@@thehulk2320 KJV cultists will twist words and use logical fallacies to justify their new age ideologies. 🥴

Just because the Geneva Bible was the first Bible translated into English does not necessarily mean it is the most accurate ! I use many different translations to try and get the full meaning of a certain text ! I own an eight translations New Testament Bible which is very helpful ! Of course, the original Hebrew and Greek texts are the most accurate !

@@ronmckinley2640 the Geneva Bible wasn't the first English printed Bible the Gettysburg Bible was the first English printed Bible 47 copies . God does not need men to interpret his words

@@ronmckinley2640 that is fine you have the choice to read whatever you choose as long as God's word is moving you in his Direction I think it's great as far as translations you need to be really careful the Jehovah's Witness rewrote a new translation of King James Bible also get the Mormons and other religions as well so you need to be very careful

Fake! Tyndale's is first printed in English. You better learn what works have made calvinists in Geneva in those years... How they killed people for nonbelieving in calvinist dogmas. And what about indians? European immigrants took the Geneva Bible to the continant of indians peoples. Where those hundreds of peoples, tribes, native possessioners of that land? On cemetery?

@@leroyromero5170 That was Latin Vulgate Bible the first ever printed BOOK.

Christian

Poor church! If they had trouble reading one, what makes you think they will read or compare all those? Your advise is not practical to someone who is not a "bookworm."

approvedofGod, I have testimony after testimony of people in my church who have had the Bible opened anew in their understanding by reading multiple translations. Discussed Scripture with a 70 year old woman who read the Bible cover to cover for the first because she finally started reading a translation she could really understand. This approach has helped my people who rarely read even more than the bookworm. The Word does not return void, so the more I can expose my people to Scripture the better they will be for it.

Shawn Wilson, that is fine if your people can benefit. I was just concerned for the average person who has trouble reading. If you feel you are okay with this, then, more power to you. God bless.

Samson's Bloody Revenge, my kids love playing with Legos. I haven't found anything Satanic about building blocks. I don't think Satan walks about as a roaring Lego set.

Shawn Willson Don't take offense as I mean none, but I would encourage you to say "Jesus's church" as opposed to "my church" so as to keep fresh in your mind that you are only a greater servant whom the Lord has allowed to shepherd "HIS PEOPLE". I'm reasonably sure you didn't lead a sinless life, was crucified, and poured your blood out for those saints you shepherd. May the Lord give you wisdom in all things.

Enjoy Satan's Version.

@@drtruthseeker8400 I read my ESV Bible and it's very easy to read and understand.

@@christianmaler2238 Really? Please read and explain why you have 16 MISSING VERSES in your Satanic translation. Explain why In Luke 2:33 your Satanic translation calls Joseph the FATHER OF JESUS!!??? I could go on and on, but if you're seeking the Truth, you have no business using an ESV.

@@drtruthseeker8400 I think ESV strives for perfection. They know what they are doing.

@@drtruthseeker8400 I'm surprised your going against a essentially Literal Bible.

And it’s free and included on bible study tools online

As a translator, I can say that 'literal' is often not synonymous with 'accurate'. IMHO YLT is best used as a reference/company to another formal equivalence version

check out the NET, its a really good version. if you have the YouVersion Bible app on your phone the NET Bible has the translator notes included which are extremely helpful

try NKJV & the She reads Truth CSB or He Reads true it’s you’re a guy! i really recommend both! u recommend NKJV bc KJV is most accurate to the original Hebrew and Greek texts i believe but the NKJV is easier to understand! the She/He Reads Truth bible is great bc it’s way to understand and there’s lots of room for writing and it’s beautiful! hope this helps! :)

One thing I do before I read the Bible is pray for my eyes and heart to be open. I too have a hard time with understanding and retaining the readings. But opening with prayer helps tremendously. Also, he does speak of the Bibles rather accurately in this video. NLT and NIV are easy to understand

NLT is a really good beginner Bible. So is NIV. NKJV can be too, but it is still more of a word for word rather than thought for thought, so it's still more difficult.

It's a logical non-sequitur that because someone quotes from a translation that they believe that translation is perfect. Also, it's illogical to extrapolate from the quoting of the Septuagint to claim that therefore the KJV is "perfect". Besides, it's doubtful that the Lord Jesus was quoting from the Septuagint since He read from the Hebrew scrolls and probably spoke mostly Aramaic.

Deuteronomy 4:2 “Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.” Revelation 22:19 “And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.”

The bible was not in existence during Jesus time...just different books AND only Old Testament.

@@derrickokida7809 yes KJV is most accurate. Because the pastor who I listen to him asked to read Protestant version of the tamil Bible. And for english readers KJV. I also planning to buy one KJV for refers. He has given example of Romans 8:1 how the words are changing.

@@ajaxslamgoody9736 yes correct because after jesus death and rose began the new covenant. He is the fulfillment of OT. So how come we have NT before rising from death

@@arulrj4758 the verses say something different compared to what? The KJV? The original Greek? Don't you agree that we should compare it to the Greek and not another English version translated by a group of men?