Abhijit Iyer-Mitra discusses the S-400 deal. Join this channel to support: / @urbanchatterati For more content and to support: patreon.com/AbhinavPrakash?ut...
Пікірлер: 753
@Goaldigger7353 жыл бұрын
Abhijit iyer mitra is the coolest depressed guy I have ever seen !!🤣🤣
@AnkitSinghAnarchoAtheist3 жыл бұрын
But he is right.... We can't intercept Ballistic Missile
@MrSoothsayer3 жыл бұрын
@@AnkitSinghAnarchoAtheist Who & What can intercept ballistic missiles?
@Goaldigger7353 жыл бұрын
@@AnkitSinghAnarchoAtheist I don't think that Indian government and defence expert is that much stupid to invest around 6 billion USD+8years and they are willing to face American sanctions for this deal 🤔🤔 Let's see bro what happens because ak47 is still best automatic rifle and still most reliable and lethal 👍
@AnkitSinghAnarchoAtheist3 жыл бұрын
@@Goaldigger735 It is best.. But in mechanical category.... That's what he is saying.... West is so ahead of Russia in Software technologies, their MSME's are driving force behind these innovations. What OS we use like Windows, Linux, MacOS, android, iOS or Internet we use like KZfaq, Facebook, Twitter, Wikipedia... Everything man.. At least give credit where it is due, moreover it make us hypocrite while using everything modern that is quintessentially American or at least western.
@AnkitSinghAnarchoAtheist3 жыл бұрын
@@MrSoothsayer Nothing.... That's why nuclear warhead are still deterent.
@reviewandinfo88633 жыл бұрын
On every defence nd political issues,Abhijit iyer be like :- mai expert hu mere ko sab aata hai😭
@yashchandan1_93 жыл бұрын
Use sach me lagbhag sare fields ki jaankari hai, tu apni soch!
@VDebonaire3 жыл бұрын
AIM is the best non-technical expert
@reviewandinfo88633 жыл бұрын
@@yashchandan1_9 haa THAAD KA JISE FULL FORM NHI PATA WO HI TERA EXPERT BAAP HO SAKTA HAI 😀😀
@kunalmandhare31443 жыл бұрын
@@yashchandan1_9 Ever wondered why the Turkey went for S-400 over THAAD and Spyder. It's worth discussing
@repealsection230forbigtech43 жыл бұрын
yes he has delusions that he actually knows everything, but instead he's looking more and more like a Phool.
@HKS1173 жыл бұрын
sometime I feel that this guy is slightly overconfident about his understanding and knowledge.
@nelhed35873 жыл бұрын
As an Aerospace Engineer I can find 29 very basic mistake Abhijeet made here. Someone really need to stop this fake expert of everything who studied at Wikipedia university and now thinks he's an engineer.
@sassukesassuke59673 жыл бұрын
@@nelhed3587 rather than making the same comment over and over again maybe list 9 of the 29 mistakes you've listed. Genuinely curious.
@alokdhaundiyal96803 жыл бұрын
Therefore, nobody listens to him.
@mac.5052 жыл бұрын
he is
@Aj-ev3dn Жыл бұрын
@@nelhed3587 half of the Indian are with engineering degrees so what ?
@rationalthinker50223 жыл бұрын
Whenever I hear Abhijeet it feels like he is the only smart man born in India, rest just don't get it at all :)
@subhasisdutta42723 жыл бұрын
But he's actually not, by trumpeting his own smartness he makes many fans though.
@anshumanbhadauria86793 жыл бұрын
Ohh... The all so omniscient Mr Abhijeet. Baki sare stratigists paise deke wahan pohoche hain.
@rameshparekh5813 жыл бұрын
It's incredible how good Indians become at faking smartness when they receive sales commission from the American weapons lobby.
@repealsection230forbigtech43 жыл бұрын
@@subhasisdutta4272 Well said.
@repealsection230forbigtech43 жыл бұрын
@TJ well said! 🤣!
@archisman41653 жыл бұрын
THAAD- Terminal High Altitude Air Defence.
@zeroinfinity40823 жыл бұрын
Formerly Theater High Altitude Air Defense
@anmolk903 жыл бұрын
Formerly it was Theatre
@archisman41653 жыл бұрын
Ok!! Thank you for the information!!
@repealsection230forbigtech43 жыл бұрын
THAAD = Totally Hyped Antiquated Air Defense. Abhijit Mitra Iyer is a know nothing on this subject: he just keeps farting out fake statements about the S-400 because he's a flake. His lie making creativity is very amusing to watch.
@shridhar23873 жыл бұрын
I love looking at the faces of people who don't know how to react when abhijit says "vel vel vetri vel"
@vik88603 жыл бұрын
What does it mean?
@hiteshmadnani64693 жыл бұрын
@@vik8860 It is a war cry of southern kings
@shreejesh54613 жыл бұрын
@@vik8860 Veeravel!.Vetrivel!... The electrifying words were the war cry of the great Sanatani Emperor Rajendra Chola who led his army to multiple victories with this chant! Vel was the spear used by Bhagwan Karthik. The chant translates to Courageous vel! Victorious vel! Har Har Mahadev!
@ssi443 жыл бұрын
@@shreejesh5461 "vel" is the tamil word for spear used by lord kartikeya or muruga to fight against his enemies. And vetri means victory They are both added and it is vel vel vetri vel a war cry of tamil kings.
@arsenalf.c64433 жыл бұрын
Veera vel vel vel. Sree Iter at PGurus know.
@knightatdawndonbynight84323 жыл бұрын
1. The kind of terminal velocity of the order of Mach 24 in descent trajectory that creates plasma shield is associated with ICBM/SLBM or even IRBM type of longer range ballistic missiles that ascend to high altitude (altitude of of350+ to ~1000km or even higher) and hence attains that kind of terminal velocity during descent post re-entry. Theater range ballistic missiles (range of 60~150 km) which may carry counter-force tactical nuclear warheads in case of adversaries like Pakistan attain terminal velocity of mach 2~5. The longer range (~350 km) interceptor missile of S400 system climbs to an altitude of ~200km while fixed wing aircrafts fly at a maximum altitude of 18~25km and you do not need a surface to air missile of ~200 km altitude capability to shoot down a fixed wing aircraft, be it fighter jet, bomber, transport aircraft or drone. The altitude capability alone of longer range missile of S400 system tells you that it can intercept Theater ballistic missiles. S400 is not a capable ballistic missile air defense system as it can not intercept most other kinds of ballistic missiles but it is a versatile air defense system in that it can intercept various kinds of aircraft at long ranges and has limited capability against ballistic missile in that it is an economical choice for air defense against incoming Theater range ballistic missiles (cost of tactical nuclear warhead that limits their use in ballistic missiles further enhances the opportunity cost and financial viability of S400). 2. Both THAAD and Arrow2/Arrow3 are dedicated and expensive ballistic missile defense systems meant for interception of long range ballistic missiles and because of their prohibitive cost, India can not afford to field such systems in numbers required against China and Pakistan. India's local BMD system has limited capabilities against only medium range ballistic missiles. All ABM/BMD systems are tested with tweaked threat scenario that is nowhere close to the threat of incoming barrage of ballistic missiles in a real world actual war scenario. Such systems create false sense of complacency and security. It is rather prudent to maintain slightly dispersed and highly mobile mechanised armor in the land forces and ramp up C4ISR, early warning and realtime firing trajectory detection capabilities along with an economical anti Theater ballistic missile air defense solution like S400 that will minimize damage on your side. Counter-value nuclear strike against Indian cities is highly unlikely as India itself possesses nuclear deterrent to retaliate in kind; even possibility of use of tactical nukes is low. Still, in order to tread with extra caution, India should evince interest in acquiring 3 Thaad/Arrow systems for Delhi, Mumbai and Bangalore-Chennai region with promise that these systems would be kept away from S400 systems and would be manned and maintained by dedicated teams not associated with S400. 3. Armenian S300 systems acquired in 1980s were intercepted with Israeli drones and loitering munitions that had superior EW capabilities against guarding obsolete point defense systems like OSA which had no dedicated serious EW components unlike India which has powerful mobile integrated EW systems like Himshakti and Samyukta that are updated keeping with air defense threat environment every few years. So you should not compare apples with oranges. Also it was Israeli drones that inflicted heavy damage with their EW capabilities; Turkish drones of Azerbaijan destroyed some antenna elements of Armenian S300 after drones and loitering munitions acquired from Israel destroyed the radar and the battery of Armenian s300. 4. Air defense missile systems are layered with common interface facility at the air defense command, they are integrated or interoperable within the system, like one battery with other battery of the same system but not with other air defense missile systems. There is a sharp demarcation between interface facility and direct hardware and software integration. Azerbaijan also has S300 (PMU2) variant acquired in early 2010s along with Israeli Barak 8 SAM that was acquired in 2016. How did Azerbaijan manage to protect their own S300 systems against Armenian strike? Were Azerbaijan's Russian S300 PMU2 "integrated" with Israeli Barak8 SAMs or with American systems to "work properly" in ways India can not or is it just that Armenia lacked strategy and EW component in both its offensive strike and defensive posture capabilities and that S300PMU2 acquired by Azerbaijan is more sophisticated than the S300 systems acquired by Armenia in 1980s? 5. The blue on blue fire by Spyder on IAF Mi17 helicopter on 27th Feb, 2019 is being blown out of proportions with ludircously poor assumptions and presumptions without any proper context. The helicopter crew kept its IFF blinkers turned off for attaining radio silence in view of possibility of presence of enemy fighters and activity of enemy air defense as it was on a low altitude patrol and rescue mission. That mission failed as the helicopter failed to penetrate enemy air space as Pakistan had already amassed its land forces around the air pocket it chose to launch offensive against India and the man to be rescued was already picked up by the enemy. While returning the helicopter crew forgot to turn on their IFF transponders; the Spyder AD crew panicked having not received friend identification signals, (as Pakistan army also operates MI 17 helicopters and radar reflections off the airframe would be similar) and shot down the chopper with infrared seeker equipped mach 5 capable Python missile of Spyder over Bugdam at very short ranges of just about 10 km to which the helicopter had no defense or reaction time to resoond to or ability to jam as Python does not have a radar seeker- it was two counts of human error that led to the blue on blue firing. Such blue on blue firings have occurred with NATO/ISAF forces in Afghanistan as well. Had there been issues like IAF Spyder locking onto IAF MI 17 despite the latter sending friendly signals, such an issue would be found out during training and war gaming and would be flagged during testing before acquisition. There are issues with absence of SDR or two way data link and MAWS on board Indian fighter jets already known from beforehand and confirmed by the air combat on that day and those issues cropping out of cost saving measures taken in previous ASQR are being fixed by upgrading and installing such systems. 6. Let us assume that Spyder is being used as point air defense system guarding S400. Let us now consider Abhijit's presumption for arguments sake that since Spyder is not integrated with S400, it may shoot down a S400 missile fired from Indian side instead of intercepting incoming threats fired by the enemy toward Indian S400 battery located on ground. Now tell me how come a mach 5 capable Python missile can effectively tail-chase a mach 15+ capable (and with similar far higher initial velocity) S400 missile flying not toward the Spyder battery but flying away from it towards the enemy aircraft. If such things are possible, why didn't Barak8 in service with Azerbaijan try to intercept the S300PMU2 missile fired by Azerbaijan to destroy a Su-25 jet in service with Armenia? 7. How believable is it that IAF would buy five regiments worth USD 5.5 billion (and not one or two regiments), of S400 systems only to test its efficacy and limitations against rafales acquired by India to ascertain the threat posed by Chinese S400 systems to Indian air assault? Wargaming and evaluation of S400 surely must be one of many technical reasons to buy S400 but is it primary reason that justifies the acquisition in such large numbers? Pentagon people are not dumb, nor are their political establishment to suck up to whatever technical reasons that might be proffered by the Pentagon to their political masters, they both know that such reasons are facades cooked up by them for providing legroom and getting India through the barrier- when they are willing to embrace such facades, there should not be any inhibition in india's strategic discourse regarding real capabilities of S400 so long as the stance of not harming American interests in the region is maintained. It is another thing that S400 does not require integration with American and Israeli systems to "work properly" but if Americans are sure that Indians are incapable of "integrating" S400 with American and Israeli systems, they should not pretend to be worried about any imaginary security threat arising of such imaginary "integration" efforts. 8. Let us assume that S400 and Spyder systems are "integrated". What good would it serve to project realtime radar situation acquired at some 600 km by the OTH radar of S400 onto a computer screen at an "integrated" command vehicle of Spyder on ground when the Spyder has nothing to fire at or look out to such ranges and its dedicated FCR will anyway only fire after its dedicated detection radar transfers threats to the FCR to be engaged? Interface is high fidelity secure real time communication input being projected on different monitors at isolated kiosks at the air defense command room for the human operators to warn both standalone systems to be alert, "he has signals on his screen at such ranges, you stay alert and keep looking out for threat in that direction". Not all radars are turned on all the time, there may be maintenance or cooling periods. In eventualities like this, such warning from interface wakes up the sleeping radar of the standalone system which is integrated with its own components. 9. Source codes required for say integration of missile with platforms or the Fire Control Radar is not shared by the OEM with the end-user. But the end-user (in this case IAF) gets to choose common IFF mode for all its platforms for any given operation regardless of their origin.
@kunalmandhare31443 жыл бұрын
are you Defence Matrix?
@knightatdawndonbynight84323 жыл бұрын
@@kunalmandhare3144 Nope. Certainly not him. Why do you think so?
@spectre39543 жыл бұрын
See the Russian's have a different Anti ballistic defense system....it is called A-135...the A-135 is capable of intercepting ICBM's and is established in crucial economic zones like Moscow and St Petersburg...
@nelhed35873 жыл бұрын
As an Aerospace Engineer I can find 29 very basic mistake Abhijeet made here. Someone really need to stop this fake expert of everything who studied at Wikipedia university and now thinks he's an engineer.
@abhaypatel42922 жыл бұрын
@@spectre3954 the problem is it works on long range... Russia's enemy's are very far needs atleast 15 min for icbm even launched from Turkey but the window bw India pakistan is 3 minutes
@rusticlotus73443 жыл бұрын
One of the major reason is that Russian arm equipments deals have huge commission margins. The other reason is strategic and to prevent major russian arm deals with pakistan.
@skg9013 жыл бұрын
Get the S500 also...😂😂 just to needle AIM...
@subhradeephalder83653 жыл бұрын
But Russia won't sell it to anyone too bad 😂😂😂
@skg9013 жыл бұрын
@@nawmsayin8017 Im sure he does... BTW I dont think THAAD is of any use... If you see recent events and news from Russia - 1. How a Russian SU30 sneaked up on Italian F35.. 2. A Russian defence specialist said that they sold the S400 to India just at the right time... May be west has better jets and subs and A2A missiles than Russia... Bur for radar and missile tech, I think that Western weapons are lagging behind.. E.G. Brahmos which is actually a Russian supersonic cruise missile... Except Barak8, no western air defecnce and even come close to stopping it...and west has nothing compared to it...
@MrJuyalpj3 жыл бұрын
@@nawmsayin8017 hahahaahahah
@skg9013 жыл бұрын
@@okkkkkkkkkl yepp... Agreed. But India doesnt have the Spider...does she?
@nikhilmalviya003 жыл бұрын
0
@defenceosprey9833 жыл бұрын
Defence matrix sends his regards
@anotheraccount99173 жыл бұрын
Uska link please
@sirbernardwoolley77893 жыл бұрын
@@anotheraccount9917 Just search defence matrix
@arvindthakur86943 жыл бұрын
😁😁😁🤫🤫
@anotheraccount99173 жыл бұрын
@@sirbernardwoolley7789 the link to the video where he trolls aim?
Should have talked about India's own air defence development: Akash NG Qrsam VLRsam MRSAM XRSAM
@govindjayakumar3 жыл бұрын
AIM with a fresh trim 🔥🔥🔥
@shivkumarpillay80193 жыл бұрын
Love abhijeets new hairstyle
@MrSoothsayer3 жыл бұрын
Overdependence on foreign ammunition has caused Hysteria among untrained military experts who proudly market uncontrollable weapons of mlecchas Showering billions of rupees in raffles, s-400, submarines is meaningless thought. Domestic weaponry market has considerable potential to outscore counterparts in making stringent weapons No say on Domestic production Brilliant youth with excellent ideas as a consequence of negligence abandon the nation and migrate to west rather to be a spinal cord of Aryavart Whose lose?
@double_courage573 жыл бұрын
Have you ever lived in a developed country? Smart people migrate to west because India will not be able to provide the comfort and lifestyle that west provides, at least not in our lifetime. Over-population, corruption and overwhelming competition to even have a respectable living is highly discouraging. Mainstream Hinduism has turned into a politically motivated, nationalist ideology ever since the "caste system" was introduced. Your so called Aryavarat died with the Mauryas, my friend.
@SurajSingh-ku1lc3 жыл бұрын
That’s a lot of information condensed in just 30 minutes, more like a winzip file 👍👌👏🙏🏻
@repealsection230forbigtech43 жыл бұрын
not really, more like a lot of nonsense and made up fake facts in 30 minutes.
@nelhed35873 жыл бұрын
As an Aerospace Engineer I can find 29 very basic mistake Abhijeet made here. Someone really need to stop this fake expert of everything who studied at Wikipedia university and now thinks he's an engineer.
@mac.5052 жыл бұрын
@@nelhed3587 make counter arguments video that's the only way I see forward
@Priyavrat_Bhardwaj3 жыл бұрын
AIM is too good. Absolutely correct informational analysis.
@charlesgulle80793 жыл бұрын
He is a academician 🔥❤️🙏
@rashmiranjansamantaray22193 жыл бұрын
Gandu he defence ke mamle me
@jivasrocks3 жыл бұрын
No he is not ..
@jackd65713 жыл бұрын
is that sarcasm?lol
@nelhed35873 жыл бұрын
As an Aerospace Engineer I can find 29 very basic mistake Abhijeet made here. Someone really need to stop this fake expert of everything who studied at Wikipedia university and now thinks he's an engineer.
@jaiprakashpatil36693 жыл бұрын
Good informative discussion for ordinary people's to know this interceptive system. You told people's who pay the money for such thing 👍👍👍👌👌👌👌
@akapriyanshusinghdev3 жыл бұрын
He forgot to tell S400 India buying is not using Russian radar it is using swordfish radar I found him funny 😂
@nelhed35873 жыл бұрын
As an Aerospace Engineer I can find 29 very basic mistake Abhijeet made here. Someone really need to stop this fake expert of everything who studied at Wikipedia university and now thinks he's an engineer.
@maddoo233 жыл бұрын
@@nelhed3587 Can you please point out a few of his mistakes here? It will be good to know. Thanks in advance
@nelhed35873 жыл бұрын
@@maddoo23 I already made a lengthy post above. Try find it.
@dmob2713 жыл бұрын
AIM makes many people depressed because he speaks the truth. Our ears are not capable of listen to criticism. I also get depressed when I listen to him but I believe in what he is saying. PS: HE IS INDEED MUCH MUCH SMART THAN MANY PEOPLE AROUND US.
@KaushikSarkar19783 жыл бұрын
Appreciate Abhijit for explaining such a complex (eco-) system in such a simple manner.
@nelhed35873 жыл бұрын
As an Aerospace Engineer I can find 29 very basic mistake Abhijeet made here. Someone really need to stop this fake expert of everything who studied at Wikipedia university and now thinks he's an engineer.
@KapilKumar-kg2un3 жыл бұрын
Always great to hear abhijit sir
@deepmalyabag23133 жыл бұрын
According to AIM P-8I Neptune cannot communicate with Indian warships and submarine then for what BEL Data Link II is used for to send whatsapp messages.
@karabiner98k543 жыл бұрын
These guys are high on weed.
@yami64993 жыл бұрын
Very good points by abhijeet. Abhijit is usually over-critical of indian tech capabilities but he is pretty much right on s-400 deal. That missile can prove very good in wartime in taking down aircrafts but little bit of calculations can tell you that it's stupidly tough to take out a ballistic missile with it. Still it's a good deal given it's great wartime potential. And he is 100% right on stupidity& ego of indian babus in general(there r exceptions of course). Also I would like you to cover below topic someday......I personally think GOI shall do this.. Indian gov shall give contracts to make cheaper low-to--mid quality drones to pvt indian companies. Indian tech companies are perfectly capable to mass produce something like that. Such mass-produced cheap weapons can heavily harass even sophisticated enemies and give an attrition edge(something india is good at). They can also be used in minor insurgencies(in such situations you wont be using things like missiles).
@piyushbharadwaj32093 жыл бұрын
Thank u for subtitles.
@AbhiroopBhattacharyya3 жыл бұрын
Love your content 👍👍👍
@snazzyc58893 жыл бұрын
Abhinav ji if you are having this conversation on zoom, sometime use the whiteboard to explain like intricate things like S400
@WhatThisVideo-WTv3 жыл бұрын
Missile system na ho gya milkshake ho gya. Sab mila do bas ki swaad aa jye. 🤣
@piyushjadhav36673 жыл бұрын
Atleast abhijeet is optimistic about delivery this doesn't happen very often 😭😭
@nelhed35873 жыл бұрын
As an Aerospace Engineer I can find 29 very basic mistake Abhijeet made here. Someone really need to stop this fake expert of everything who studied at Wikipedia university and now thinks he's an engineer.
@saurabhdang73073 жыл бұрын
India developed different type of software defined radio for the communication problem
@sureshbesra4663 жыл бұрын
yeah cant communicate. During Red Flag exercise,Su-30s can't connect via datalink with AWACS. So AWACS operator has to verbally , 6 o clock enemy , and Su-30s ended up shooting lot of teammates .Team and AWACS operator were really pissed about the exercise with Su-30s.
@tage123.63 жыл бұрын
I watched a KZfaq channel called Defence Matrix and i had a good laughter. Living in Barbi world.
@vivanranjan2613 жыл бұрын
a podcast with abhijit on architecture pls from ancient medieval to modern (including interior design) we all know he is a great repository of architectural knowlege
@GD_9023 жыл бұрын
Hi Abhinav sir, I really love listening to your shows with AIM. Will you have a session with AIM where you discuss about the MH60 Romeo helicopters purchased by the Indian Navy? Thanks and regards.
@Vilkox3 жыл бұрын
Fantastic information as always AIM. Thank you.
@nelhed35873 жыл бұрын
As an Aerospace Engineer I can find 29 very basic mistake Abhijeet made here. Someone really need to stop this fake expert of everything who studied at Wikipedia university and now thinks he's an engineer.
@techkiosk33913 жыл бұрын
Need a video on drones and India's advancement
@Kem____paalty163 жыл бұрын
No advancement eventually IA and MOD will delay and hype then government will buy mq 9 reaper from america.
@hdjfjd83 жыл бұрын
@@Kem____paalty16 exactly , independent private players should be allowed too develop drones
@techkiosk33913 жыл бұрын
So if tomorrow there is war like situation,then it will be a repetation of armenia , Azerbaijan war at Western front?
@Kem____paalty163 жыл бұрын
@@techkiosk3391 yeah thats what abhijit also said the sub sonic single engine drones capable of carrying 4-6 atgms will cause heavy casualties if our old age air defense systems fail, I hope u have seen those vedios from Armenia vs Azerbaijan war, those turkish drones were even hitting trenches and under ground hide out posts, they were killing few with first stike then waited/ hover above the target when another Armenian soldiers came to rescue injured the killed all by 2nd strike, in mountains the place to hide is a cave. Nothing else. A lot off buggers are defending thjs failer by saying drones cant fly better in high altitude well they have to fly high just enough high to destroy air defence.
@nelhed35873 жыл бұрын
As an Aerospace Engineer I can find 29 very basic mistake Abhijeet made here. Someone really need to stop this fake expert of everything who studied at Wikipedia university and now thinks he's an engineer.
@adisura99043 жыл бұрын
I wish this was live so i could ask if Infra red seekers would he effective in seeing an inbound warhead that is entering the atmosphere since it would be creating some decent amount of heat
@deepaksinghrajawat3613 жыл бұрын
I'm not an expert but may be Range is problem bro infrared seeker can't detect that far..
@adisura99043 жыл бұрын
@@deepaksinghrajawat361 don't mind my earlier comment that was not for this video lol
@adisura99043 жыл бұрын
@@deepaksinghrajawat361 yeah i do think that is a problem but in terminal guidance phase (of the infrared missle) it won't be a problem. You can guide the missle using standby radars, during its terminal phase the missle could turn on the IRST to home in
@NavneetKash3 жыл бұрын
Really like this guy. He knows as much as to make a fool out of you. I just want to read his PhD thesis to know what he really knows.
@repealsection230forbigtech43 жыл бұрын
yes Abhijit is such a fraud in this area that even teenage boys in Gurgaon know more about missile systems than this professional KZfaq chatterbox.
@sakshamsinha29133 жыл бұрын
Could you kindly cite an example?
@rakeshkala70423 жыл бұрын
Defence analyst 😀😀...DRDO would be like: kaha the aap
@rao85593 жыл бұрын
@@repealsection230forbigtech4 show evidence for these claims. What did he say is wrong. Gurgaon boys are semi literate . They barely understand bullock cart.
@repealsection230forbigtech43 жыл бұрын
@@rao8559 I think my sarcasm went right over your head, so I doubt you have the maturity, knowledge or intellect to understand the self evident proof of Abhijit's massive bullgobbar output. being a blind faith bakht you will not be able to process the truth.
@S_T_Channel3 жыл бұрын
Nice conversation
@TJ-wo1xt3 жыл бұрын
This thing where AIM, says platforms dont talk to each other is false, It used to happen, but does not happen anymore. Outdated info.
@sankarasubramani89533 жыл бұрын
Platforms can talk to each other only to the extent of what interface being provided by other system.. these are not commercial platforms.. there should be sense of secrecy in defense platform
@rp19983 жыл бұрын
Do we really think that somthing like data links which is one the crucial part of a weapon platform, will ignored by Navy, airforce or army? Most of the deals we do, have significant changes done to the weapon platform or equipment before induction, for which inturn we have to pay extra money to their manufacturers.
@regnauldmortimer49522 жыл бұрын
Very informativd
@the24thintrovert3 жыл бұрын
He was talking about defence matrix youtube channel
@rohitnair59583 жыл бұрын
Lt gen air commodore read admiral A I Mitra at his best
@sayantanchoudhury30823 жыл бұрын
Sir if possible please do a show on current financial & economical condition of India. If it's presently undergoing a recession then please explain what are the reasons and what can be done to overcome it..⁉️
@RajaBoraNE3 жыл бұрын
It was never for anti balistic missile, it has always been for fighter jets.
@rajarshibasu42803 жыл бұрын
Systems integration across platforms is quite simple with advanced software integration bus and respective system API. Great to see the confusion with a non technical who is certainly not from an engineering background. Spreading misinformation is unwarranted from any novice.
@hanumandehru31073 жыл бұрын
Isko ye pta nahi ki blue tooth s hi sare ek jagah aa jate h or virtual system kis chudia ka naam h net s dusre ko jod dete h or software develop ho sakta h.
@nelhed35873 жыл бұрын
As an Aerospace Engineer I can find 29 very basic mistake Abhijeet made here. Someone really need to stop this fake expert of everything who studied at Wikipedia university and now thinks he's an engineer.
@hanumandehru31073 жыл бұрын
@@nelhed3587 please metion those mistake though some of them we know.
@INCREDIBLE6932 жыл бұрын
abhijit is like a cricket match viewer who sits aback n throws ideologies.But never tries to get in to the arena to try n play.I wish he will do something grear n get enrolled in defence sector
@BFR-13 жыл бұрын
43k viewers!!!!! Thank god I'm no alone in this - Jai Hind
@amanch0053 жыл бұрын
And things like that
@pratikpal55653 жыл бұрын
Is the video Demonetized ?
@yashchandan1_93 жыл бұрын
Why?
@jcd7763 жыл бұрын
27:50 Aegis Ashore is promising apparently.
@kishorjamatkar94363 жыл бұрын
All true, agreed on every point
@nelhed35873 жыл бұрын
As an Aerospace Engineer I can find 29 very basic mistake Abhijeet made here. Someone really need to stop this fake expert of everything who studied at Wikipedia university and now thinks he's an engineer.
@shashiketan3 жыл бұрын
We need someone who can tell the pros & reasoning behind buying the system & not just knowing the cons & bashing the decision. I would love to hear what would be his strategy with the resources available at hand? Can we go purely US based weapon ignoring Russia entirely? Can we have entirely Russian based systems ? We need more practical person from defense to answer the technicalities. Regarding Indian defense on Endospheric & exospheric that he mentioned - I believe we would be firing only one of them rather than both of them like he mentioned (based on my common sense - although i could be entirely wrong). Regarding interoperability - if we have our own indigenous system then we can have one integrated system. Complete dependence to any side could be risky hence our dependence on multiple countries although we do compromise on system efficiency. It would be nice to hear from some defense personnel with practical experience.
@avraniladhikari26223 жыл бұрын
Can u make a video with Abhijit Sir on Arjun tank programme. Please Sir I have a request for u
@RandomUser-um2zq3 жыл бұрын
Based/Cool Channel.
@14077goodluck3 жыл бұрын
Not lower...lower and closer....you fly low enough you can be shot at visually only because you will be below the radar horizon.
@sudeepkumar43533 жыл бұрын
🙏🇮🇳
@RohitRoy-nq8td3 жыл бұрын
Even Abhinav Sir is laughing sometimes in the middle of the video.
@riteshmallik94433 жыл бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@ankurpandey4479 Жыл бұрын
Sir we have integrated air defence . Layers are QR SAM[INDIAN], AKASH PRIME[INDIAN],AKASH NG[INDIAN],BARAK 8[INDIAN], LR SAM [INDIAN], XR SAM[INDIA], S400, [RUSSIAN], BMD PHASE 1[INDIAN], BMD PHASE2 [ INDIAN]. XR Sam, LR SAM , and Akash ng is under development . Sir we have fully integrated air defences.
@seanbellfort22983 жыл бұрын
National Security topmost priority. Who so ever willing to sell, India must go for it right now.
@sbhatt843 жыл бұрын
Please do program on Indian ballistic missile defense program
@nilnull54573 жыл бұрын
Defence Matrix, aag laga do.
@piyushjadhav36673 жыл бұрын
A question for Abhijit can India develope its own anti bellestic missile system and become independent in defence sector Is privatisation of DRRO the way for defence autonomy
@sajalbanerjee19723 жыл бұрын
He would say we don't have the technology and industrialization to make that 🤣🤣
@shashwat84633 жыл бұрын
Privatization is not the answer for everything.
@jsg21963 жыл бұрын
Better to Privatize PSUs and divide DRDO into three labs like Army Research Laboratory, same research laboratories for Navy and Airforce!
@piyushjadhav36673 жыл бұрын
@@jsg2196 privatisation is the only solution it drives inovation
@crsuthar3 жыл бұрын
#Abhijit US is claiming that they have destroyed S400 in simulation drills are the claims true? if yes then what does that mean?
@KshitijKV2 жыл бұрын
Absolutely true about Igla and Tungushka
@majhangprakash3 жыл бұрын
23:17 he forgot the question
@muneeshsharma86493 жыл бұрын
Abhijeet you are so educated ...... can you tell me one thing .? If we start a war and we shoot down a military sataliate then how will you guide all these missile ? S-400 is for air supperiority planes ...... each thing is required for a special purpose
@repealsection230forbigtech43 жыл бұрын
Abhijit is a talk a lot know nothing.
@geopoliticswithhistorygeog14413 жыл бұрын
I am proud that i figured out AIM is bakchod and ultrapro US kind a lobbyist way back in 2019😂😂😂
@nelhed35873 жыл бұрын
As an Aerospace Engineer I can find 29 very basic mistake Abhijeet made here. Someone really need to stop this fake expert of everything who studied at Wikipedia university and now thinks he's an engineer.
@surajgupta24523 жыл бұрын
I don't think ballistic missile s are difficult to track. According to facts they are the first missile's which can be detected easily. It takes time to enter earth orbit and can be shot in space itself.
@amitkp69573 жыл бұрын
S-400 is way above Patriot, Thaad or Arrow. It is also much more cheap in price. S-400 placed in an area will make a no fly zone for 400 kms for 360 degrees rotation. Btw, don't think Armenian S-300 was down by a drone, mainly because it was not even in the area where battle was taking place.
@jonathanalvinrays..70703 жыл бұрын
First batch is coming. It is a good system...
@tusharkapoor243 жыл бұрын
Please ask AIM about ak-203 rifles. Why haven't they they hit the ground yet. And how long do we have to wait for production to start
@nelhed35873 жыл бұрын
As an Aerospace Engineer I can find 29 very basic mistake Abhijeet made here. Someone really need to stop this fake expert of everything who studied at Wikipedia university and now thinks he's an engineer.
@SPEARHEADGLOBAL3 жыл бұрын
Why people think Abhijit is military equipment expert? Wen he absolutely not
@subhankardey87132 жыл бұрын
What about India's own Akash,qrsam,mrsam,barak8,xrsam ....india also different level of air defence systems
@Blind_Bandit3 жыл бұрын
Abhijit is dissing Defense Matrix.
@Blind_Bandit3 жыл бұрын
This is how.. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p7yKf62WurjSpIU.html
@bhaveshdk3 жыл бұрын
Omm
@rajat96192 жыл бұрын
I have some querries for AIM that why can't Russian & Western systems be integrated if Western missiles can be integrated with Russian fighter jets or vice-versa. Python & Derby AAMs on Su-30MKI; LCA can fire R-73, R-77, Derby, Python, ASRAAM. Although he gave a close analogy of Android, Windows & Apple trying to sync, but he forgot that the limited sync b/w them is possible because they all use something called "device drivers" to communicate over same technology of TCP/UDP, IP, Ethernet, WiFi, Bluetooh, etc. There is no need to disclose core OS code, that's why device-drivers are made which link higher level internal specific protocols talk to lower level external generic protocols to interface with outside world. You can see the lower levels of protocol stack of any OS. You can play videos from Windows laptop or iphone on Android TV, for example. What if Wipro/Infosys/TCS/CDAC/IIT/etc build an indegenous OS to end dependency on Windows, Linux, iOS, etc but also would like to limitedly "communicate" (not exactly integrate) with those OSs?? In future we will see "Aatmnirbhar Bharat" with our own OS, DB, chips, servers, network, etc. At UN there are incompatible countries sitting F2F but they have to follow common protocols of behavioral conduct. This means DRDO has to develop a "command S/w" acting like boss or parent, which absorbs data by all radars (Western or Russian or indegenous), builds a single FUSED picture of battlespace & then commands actions of missile firing. Then the Spider missile will be under control of this central "command S/w" not to fire on S-400 missile accidentally. If our ISRO can develop successful SLVs then i'm sure DRDO, HAL, NAL, etc can do the needful but question is when.
@spectre39543 жыл бұрын
The Russian's have a different Anti ballistic defense system....it is called A-135...the A-135 is capable of intercepting ICBM's and is established in crucial economic zones like Moscow and St Petersburg... The S-400 has a limited Anti-Ballistic missile capability...it is capable of intercepting low range ballistic missiles like Abdali (200km)...M 11 (350km) and Ghaznavi (320km)... India is developing many indigenous short range anti air missile defence system like Akash-NG, VL-SRSAM, QRSAM...
@sagarsahu59603 жыл бұрын
Don't know why abhjeet doesn't look in good shape 🥺
@piyushjadhav36673 жыл бұрын
I am loving this channel 👍👍
@abhinavshukla22023 жыл бұрын
Why do you have soviet flag?
@piyushjadhav36673 жыл бұрын
@@abhinavshukla2202 it's kinda cool Hammer and sickle 👊👊
@abhinavshukla22023 жыл бұрын
@@piyushjadhav3667 okkk
@abhinavshukla22023 жыл бұрын
@@piyushjadhav3667 hope you don't have ideological inclination.
@piyushjadhav36673 жыл бұрын
@@abhinavshukla2202 Hell nooo 😭😭 I love apple I love tata I love ambani I love Adani I love Birla I want India to become a Hindu nation with the ruthlessness of communist ideology
@theaborigine11193 жыл бұрын
Just like AIM even some American defense analysts also admit that they even they don't have proper anti-ballistic missile systems but one difference between America and India is both nations flaunt too much. Ek bolta hai mera F16 bahut accha hai aur dusra bolta hai mera Tejas bahut accha hai...Instead of compiling and develop a new philosophy both America and India argue whose philosophy is better...Why don't Delhi just say straightforwardly to american "We don't trust you(Biden Administration)"...Bring Trump Back...
@prasadmlv82673 жыл бұрын
Abhijit sir, ..the chapter is over good or bad ,ultimately man behind the mechine is important. We are capable of handling any equipment,as an engineer various Equipments we have handled,we are Capable enough. It is does not make any sense to kick A dead dog. Good or bad, wife is ia wife and she is beloved at the end.
@peaceful16583 жыл бұрын
Valid point regarding s400 vs Rafael simulation to counter Chinese s400👍🏻
@kimjong-un99143 жыл бұрын
Ooooooo peaceful community ... What is next plan ...wholaaa or uber
@peaceful16583 жыл бұрын
@@kimjong-un9914 next plan is olaa ubar 💣🤣
@vedantsharma47093 жыл бұрын
No body talked About Akash SAM ?
@waqarahmed-zo1yi3 жыл бұрын
I have a question for Mr. Mitra. Can Pakistan update its F-16 fleet to Block 70 or V so standars, if it could, to counter balance Rafale.
@veerswami71753 жыл бұрын
Not usa will heckled them
@waqarahmed-zo1yi3 жыл бұрын
@@veerswami7175 I said if it could, then what ? Would the upgrade be sufficient ?
@arjunj.s79383 жыл бұрын
@@waqarahmed-zo1yi No, f-16 is an older design and has design limitations compared to rafale so it won't be able to accommodate latest technologies. Meteor missiles are currently the most potent bvr missiles too.
@Deepakrai7676223 жыл бұрын
Love you gainda
@chandrachurniyogi83943 жыл бұрын
so basically the only chance to intercept & successfully destroy an incoming ICBM is when the missile is still in space immediate prior to re entering the earth's atmosphere and that too if it can be intercepted in space!!! great, absolutely great!!! really encouraging!!!
@rajeev39833 жыл бұрын
Many in the defence ministry must he paid off for this S400
@HK-ih2sv3 жыл бұрын
Not sure defense expert but AIM with his hand & facial movements can be very good kathak Ali dancer 😜😜
@shekharbanerjee39513 жыл бұрын
As always AIM ROCKS
@PrinceSingh-mj1jw3 жыл бұрын
Only that country uses its weapon best is the country who develops it
@rishavbhowmik77783 жыл бұрын
So Keeping relation with Rus in mind, and money India can spend. There is no alternative to S400! Using risky combination is as good as it can get.
@Raja-vg8og2 жыл бұрын
Universal basic education, universal healthcare, shelter and no hunger should be the only motive of the government, not futuristic impractical star war scenarios.
@kgrg7073 жыл бұрын
Ideally they should buy the patriot system and s400 both.
@R_V_713 жыл бұрын
S400 in indian arm forces for was Offensive role. if they want defensive with sys they will high chances of some lose. For defensive purpose IAF needs more than 3k to 5k s400 missiles for both front for pak nd china. With gud offensive strategy+s400+rafael+su30mki cap to wipe out enemy before they retaliate. for defensive role akash missiles variants we need in big numbers. like 3k to 5k num.+ barak8 or er. and if enemy's goes for nuk/balastic missile we need 400 to 1k BMD with proper deployed for battle. our also on ship based like Americans battle ships.
@ReachDefence2 жыл бұрын
We don't understand why the Integrated Air Defence command has been considered into this crucial discussion, that's the whole point, if a system that cannot directly communicate with another (by principle, it does not have to), because the IADS will have the complete air picture, and they are the ones that will be guiding it. Until the IADS is taken out, there is no reason for S-400 or other systems to function independently themselves. AIM clearly not looking into the full picture here. If Spyder cannot talk to S-400, it will relay it back to IADS, and the IADS will relay it all in real time to the S-400 units. This is actually a brief and not a technical aspect also, if you discuss deeply you will discover the fallacies in his arguments.
@immortalwisdom4913 жыл бұрын
The algorithm "i will nt name it" is used in Ballistics , SAS&A is different. The RF of the material has the potency to engage. AIM is been fooling ppl bcz they don't know about Technology.
@lokeshjain54203 жыл бұрын
Defence Matrix boy destroyed In style
@defenceosprey9833 жыл бұрын
Please can you explain how
@sanchittandon91962 жыл бұрын
ye different weapons k integration waali baat to humare generals ko bhi pata hogi aur wo bhi kuch na kuch to soch kar hi dure weapons lete honge