This man just took out a skull from his backpack. Was NOT expecting that lol

As a system architect, I can testify that great components of a system is always reused in another system. It applies to both hardware and software. If God invented logic, it makes sense He would apply some engineering principles.

"If you stop eating your own vomit, you'll probably stop vomiting." Top notch advice right there.

Neanderthal s played the flute and did amazing paintings. They made clothes and tools. Animals do not do that.

Evolutionists love to point out all the similarities humans have with animals, but they steer far clear of talking about the differences. No other creature on earth can come close to producing music, art, literature, a moral code, etc. We stand alone in those things, and we see no signs of the lower orders growing in them.

This topic is greatly needed in today's church! So happy to see God's ministers tackling this issue.

I just found this channel a couple days ago, and it’s a real gem. Thank you for the great content

My stepdad was 4ft.11 and 350lbs! If they dug him up 500yrs from now they would say they found a new North American gorrila!!!

Interesting timing in light of this recent study by Almécija et al. (2021). a few quotes to note. After 150 years of continuous discoveries, essential information about human origins remains elusive … Even worse, relatively complete fossil apes undisputedly assigned to early members of the gorilla and chimpanzee lineages remain to be found. Humans are storytellers: Theories of human evolution often resemble “anthropogenic narratives” that borrow the structure of a hero’s journey to explain essential aspects such as the origins of erect posture, the freeing of the hands, or brain enlargement (166). Intriguingly, such narratives have not drastically changed since Darwin (166). We must be aware of confirmation biases and ad hoc interpretations by researchers aiming to confer their new fossil the starring role within a preexisting narrative. Evolutionary scenarios are appealing because they provide plausible explanations based on current knowledge, but unless grounded in testable hypotheses, they are no more than “just-so stories". , a senior research scientist with American Museum of Natural History, is also quoted as offering this remarkable admission: “When you look at the narrative for hominin origins, it’s just a big mess - there’s no consensus whatsoever.”

I've worked in factories for years I know a lot of Apemen

What should Christians think about Ape Men? I think you should leave Congress out of this.

Did anyone else not notice the gorilla vomit until he pointed it out 🤷‍♂️

The next time you hear science say, "This newly discovered finger bone is going to change everything we thought we ever knew about human history" than you can rest assured...their current understanding is on pretty shaky ground.

This is the best explanation concerning evolution and creation I have heard so far. I think science will not contradict God`s divine wisdom and creation but perhaps help us to understand it a little better.

Of all the experts on this series, this one left me with the most questions and doubt. I think this needs much more attention.

Three monkeys sat in a coconut tree Discussing things as they’re said to be. Said one to the others: “Now listen you two, There’s a certain rumour that can’t be true That man descended from our noble race - Why, the very idea is a disgrace! “No monkey ever deserted his wife, Starved her babies and ruined her life; And you’ve never known a mother monk Leave her babies with others to bunk, Or pass them on from one to another ‘Til they scarcely know who is their mother. “And another thing you’ll never see - A monk build a fence round a coconut tree, Forbidding all other monks to taste And letting the coconuts go to waste. Why! if I built a fence round a coconut tree Starvation would force you to steal from me. “Here’s another thing a monk won’t do: Go out at night and get in a stew, Or use a gun or club or knife To take some other monkey’s life. Yes, man descended, the ornery cuss, But brother he didn’t descend from us Author unknown

The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God.

Genesis 6 gives some insight into this subject.

6:55 couldnt stop laughing

Great commentary. Thanks!

Everyone needs to read through Genesis 6 when it’s talk about fallen angels and the daughters of mankind.

Thank you for opening this science. It will change education and improve mankind's evaluation of the Bible. Bless you. I am following and sharing

Getting some Dora the Explorer vibes from this man and his backpack full of items 😀 Fascinating topic! Ive really enjoyed the videos in this playlist

I died laughing on the vomit part😂

In the same vein, explain the diversity that sprouted from a single cell that eventually "crawled out of" a primordial ooze and spawned all this life. Did it mate with another single cell and from where ? Much less, how did the single cell suddenly become "alive".

Also, compare Stephen hawkings bones to Antonio silva from UFC and tell me an archeologist digging up those bones might easily mistake them as two different species lmao

Thank you for sharing.

One thing you gotta say about this doctor is that he seems very honest. Even if you are an atheist you'd have to admit that. I'd like to see him debate Aaron ra.

Would've been great if that ape in the background came to the conversation while passing the skulls back n forth. Ape could've held onto one too. Anyhow, love history & the Bible. We have a very rich & informative past.

heres a thought, pre-flood we had a wider range of human beings populating the planet. When the flood came the only gene pool was carried by those 8 in the ark.... pithicus may be a representative.of one such lost geneology

I would love to see a video where Dr. Wood explains where he would draw this line. As far as I am aware there are a lot of skulls between the neanderthal/modern human and ape skulls they have not talked about.

I'm very interested in the elongated skulls that are obviously NOT the result of reshaping which have no suture line that would normally create two parietal plates but rather result in one solid anterior skull cap. Are these "human"?

An atheist once said, "I'm just an evolved fish that should be breeding, eating and sleeping like the rest of the animal kingdom but all my focus is on my origin, and I don't know why."

Guess they should know their rh factor. Negative blood is not traced to the same beginning

Hey Doctors, a question for you. What is the one bone that never stops growing through your whole life? As far as the neanderthal scull your holding if you know the answer to this question it will give you a new answer to what those so called Neanderthals were.

It makes sense that beings which are similar share similar genetics, doesn't mean they are related by a common ancestor. The same way if a sculpt a cat, a gorilla and a human from clay, the gorilla and the human would take a similar sculpting technique, it does not mean I sculpting a gorilla first and then morphed it into a human.

See Dr. David Menton (phd anatomy) "Three ways to make an ape-man" for additional input on this subject.

I’m intrigued

You should have played that old song “ I’m an apeman, I’m an apeman. Ape ape man”

Does the much older age of the human at death pre flood, affect some features of the human skeleton more, when compared to post flood humans after God shortened the lifespan of humans? Do some parts of the human skeleton keep growing throughout life?

Interpretations of evidence without proof is just an assumption based on world view.

I can take a tooth, a bone, a skull, and spin any narrative I want. It comes with two requirements however, 1) I have letters following my last name, 2) it adheres to the evolutionary pseudo scientific paradigm. I feel sorry for those wasting their lives on such a worthless pursuit 🙃

Great video

I can explain this. The Giant weird skulls with heavy eyebrow ridges are the people who lived for 100s of years in the Bible. And also the nephalum were absolutely huge!! Eye brow ridges NEVER stop growing.

It reminds me of the story of Jacob and Esau, they were fraternal twins and very different in appearance. I believe there were many differences in the early humans which has given rise to the evolution stories because we don’t have any way of knowing what the ancient humans looked like.

If I were to point at a computer, or a house, and say no one designed it, no one created it, it just put itself together over the countless years- one could, would, and SHOULD look at me like I've utterly lost my mind. So why on earth do people believe that life, something far more complex than any computer or house could be, was created en mass by nothing and out of nothing?

I am a devout Christian, who does not adhere to the 'dictation' theory of biblical inspiration. The two separate creation stories in Genesis is not bad science, because it was never meant to be science at all. The message in genesis is much deeper & philosophical than just a simplistic view which falsely forces faith & reason to be in conflict.

I am praying for the hardened hearts of men who still deny Gods existence, even when there is good evidence that shows there is a creator.

Well first off! They should start thinking instead of letting someone else do the thinking for them!!!!

TY brothers. See you soon w/our Lord in the clouds.

I think the top scientists who study this stuff will eventually find a point in our evolutionary history to say the lines don't add up how can the brain evolve so fast in the span of 50,000 years or less. I think they are hoping to dig up another link in the chain soon to explain why this happened and in my opinion it's only going to create more questions

Another I heard but unsure about but I’ve heard that the human brow line and other features never stop growing so if in pre-flood times when there was no need what so ever for a green new deal, a time when man lived almost 1000 years. What would old man Adam’s skull look like?

Well I'm still excited for the coming discoveries.....science n discoveries have just begun....just need patience as we see things unravel

It would have been interesting to hear the perspective on skull archeology and the nephelim

Cannot wait!

Guys, please go and listen an actual evolutionary biologist about this. This guys is presenting specimens literally millions of years apart for comparison, he also he makes the statement that we are descended from apes, which just isn't so. We share a common ancestor millions of years ago. We are not descended from the great apes, if he is willing to distort that simple message, I believe he is either deceiving us, himself or both out of convenience in trying to understand the evolution/genesis naratives.

If you get rid of Adam and Eve, you get rid of the tree in the garden. And you cut down the need for the tree of Calvary. The idea that there is no judgement is what drives these philosophies.

This reminds me of a time when my wife and I stopped to visit the Knoxville Zoo on our way through town as we were traveling. We had young kids and needed a planned break along the way for everyone to stretch and expend some energy. We walked up to a small building near the gorillas that housed some that were there for medical and other purposes, but gave patrons an opportunity to view the creatures up close. As we stood there, another couple came up and stood with us. The particular gorilla we were watching proceeded to defalcate a baseball-sized dropping into its hand and pull it around to its face to smell it and take a bite. My wife and I understood that this was not entirely abnormal behavior. The other couple looked at this in shock and said to themselves, "Okay. I guess they really aren't that much like us?" They walked off and we were able to explain to our kids how this was a marvelous creature of God's, but that it was still not a human.

1 x 10 -100,000 is the percent of species that we know about that have ever lived. That’s a decimal with 100,000 zeros and then a 1. Over 3 billion years of life on earth and a trillion billion species of plant, animals and insects. Our fossil record is infinitely small compared to the number of species that have existed.

Let me preface this comment by saying that I'm a 100% Genesis is true creationist. I will try to be as loving as I can in expressing my thoughts. Sometimes Christians will produce videos that they would have been better off not producing. I'm sad to say this is one of those videos. Normally videos produced by the channel "Is Genesis History" are very well made, informative, and gives the Christian excellent tools for effective apologetics. This video on the other hand leaves the viewer (at least in my case and probably others as well) wondering exactly which side of the issue the video is supporting. The first half of this video is something I would expect from an Evolutionist channel. It seemingly gave more evidence for evolution than it did for creation. I know that's not what it was intended to do but that's definitely the way it turned out. The video as a whole seemed to me like you put a whole bunch of different ideas into a blender and produced a video from the results. I'm sorry brothers but like I said this video creates more confusion (even where confusion didn't exist before watching the video) than it does clarity, and in my opinion is way below the quality I'm accustomed to seeing from you guys. Godspeed in all you do God bless Brothers.

"Whosoever doeth any work in the sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death." Exodus 31:15.

On "The Natural History of Retroviruses" In a blog called "Answers in Genesis", in a post entitled "The Natural History of Retroviruses", Yingguang Liu and Charles Soper speculate that, because parts of some ERVs (endogenous retroviruses) perform functions either useful or essential for their hosts, they might have been created (as opposed to having been exaptated) in order to perform those functions. There are several problems with this idea, but from their point of view, the biggest problem is that they are shooting themselves in their creationist feet! See below. Liu and Soper state that retroviral elements have been degraded by mutations. That is certainly true. So much for the creationist assertions that all DNA is functional, but their biggest problem is pointed out by fellow creationist Todd Wood in a blog post of his own. The problem is, How come, if they are unrelated, do chimp and human ERVs share the same disabling mutations? "Since the human and chimp genomes are very similar, the majority of ERVs are the same and have the same apparent "disabling mutations." Given the separate origins of humans and chimps (Genesis 2:7), we've either experienced thousands and thousands of mutations that are exactly the same as chimps or those "mutations" were created that way in the beginning. Since creation is the simpler hypothesis, that means the apparent degeneration of human and chimp ERVs is precisely that: apparent. Like ERVs themselves, the "disabling mutations" were also put there for a reason." - Todd Wood, "Microbes continue: retroviruses" So either chimps and humans are unrelated, their ERVs are degraded, and the common mutations are a colossal coincidence (Liu and Soper) or chimps and humans are unrelated, and their ERVs are not degraded. (Wood). Yet there is massive evidence that ERVs are degraded - evidence that Liu and Soper themselves go into in detail. Indeed, the results of the "Phoenix virus" experiment, that resurrected a fully working exogenous (free) retrovirus from a set of "broken" ERVs shows that ERVs are indeed the inherited remains of mutated proviruses, and that the mutations that have degraded them are different in different ERVs (countering the suggestion that their mutations are common due to some deterministic process, BTW). It turns out that if you correct or reverse the mutations in ERVs, you end up with huge numbers of working proviruses in every nuclear cell of your body - in other words, you end up very, very dead, very, very quickly. There is clear evidence that ERVs common to different species do indeed share common mutations, as Wood claims. See Shared mutations among ERVs in identical loci and the corroboratory nested hierarchies they fall into. Perhaps the error that both parties make is the presuppositional assumption that they both make. What was it now? Yes, that was it: "Chimps and humans are unrelated." An object lesson in how, when you start from a biased position and then try to "prove" it, never mind how much work you put into it, you end up failing to see even the most obvious problems with your ideas.

These ads are a big mistake, KZfaq. You are just putting people off clicking. It is extremely irritating.

I have always wondered this. Look at ape's lower jaws. They are all rounded, but Humans have chins. In the late 1970's I heard a secular lecturer say that only humans have chins. Has anyone else heard that or have you noticed this difference between humans and apes?

If man descended from apes, then how come there are still apes?

Your ancestors may have come from apes...not mine.

@6:21 😆😆😆🙈🤮🤮 I’ve watched this before but never noticed the ape puking in the background! 😁

Big question... when did evolution stop? Why aren't the apes and monkeys in the zoo turning into humans? Or even the ones in the wild? Why don't fish grow legs anymore and just walk right up onto the beaches? Why did dinosaurs disappear yet we say reptiles descended from them? And if that is true, why are there no huge reptiles standing as tall as buildings anymore? And if all of mankind descended from apes, why do we all look different?

Also..Why didnt apes,gorillas, keep evolving then?...God created....after their kind....after its kind....and Man,in HIS image

They were apes, not men. There is no evolution in Scripture, and that’s good enough for me.

I am a Christian but when someone tells me what to think or what I should think as implied by your video title I am completely turned off.

Dr. John Sanford plant geneticist with world renowned innovations and inventions in the field of genetic modification maintains that Neanderthals were humans with a certain pathology brought about by breeding within small communities from interviews I've seen with him,that certainly seems possible to me,and I think we would all almost certainly agree that he would be more academically qualified to come to such an assertion than most of us on here.there are also certain indigenous peoples that carry features such as the heavier brow etc.alive today,but nobody thinks these people are anything other than human like the rest of us,there is variation within the kind,it's all genetic information,another point is this,it is said that in all of nature the most similar flesh of any creature to our own is that of the pig,now if we descended from apes shouldn't it be them that have the most similar flesh to us,DNA is coded information,are we to believe that the information to create made for purpose limbs of all kinds,scales,skin, different types of eyes,breathing apparatus and such for all the plethora of life forms on this planet lay ready to be put to use in these single celled organisms that we are all to have evolved from,or that this information was accrued by a process of selection that randomly exists without reason from a series of ongoing mutations which are overwhelmingly deleterious by the way according to the afore mentioned dr.john Sanford and others.the main man in the new atheist movement Anthony flew upon witnessing the complexity at a cellular level abandoned his previous position,Richard Dawkins now the leading man in same said grouping when asked how he accounts for the apparent design in nature said the aliens must have done it and they must have evolved through a process similar to Darwinian evolution,the equivalent of kicking the can down the road, who created the aliens? When Darwin came up with his theory little to nothing was known about the vast complexity of the cell itself,we hadn't microscopes strong enough,Michael j Behe in his book Darwin's black box outlines the integrated nd cooperative nature of molecular machines working at this level to ensure the cell works properly,and there are how many cells in our bodies?what about the why? what's never discussed is purpose,there simply isn't need for things to evolve into all these different species and such,couldn't the simple bacterium's and amoebas and things always just remain as such,wouldn't life be easier and more pain free to do so?how anybody can look at all dis beautiful complexity and come to the conclusion that random unguided mutations filtered through natural selection brought all dis about for no other reason than for us to procreate kill and eat till we die is beyond me.what need then have we for things such as music,why do we love till our dying breaths our near and dear.why do the laws of nature exist surely a purposeless explosion would create more chaos than order,yet we see fine tuning exhibited!did we invent or discover mathematics?if we invented them why do we see them at work in nature.why does conscious observation affect the outcome of experiments pertaining to things of a quantum nature,how do people have out of body experiences,there's a lot more to this whole thing than a couple of gathered monkey bones.god bless you all.that we all may live as we are meant to and exhibit the love that jesus demonstrated and prescribed for us.

Christians can have a wide variety of viewpoints concerning creation, all irrelevant to accepting Christ as one's Savior. This is simply Science vs. Dogma. The way I see it, God invented evolution.

Perhaps the gorilla, in his infinite boredom, has found a way to enjoy his meal more than once?

Does this channel address the theory of saltation? I read about it in The New Biology by Augros and Stanciu. It fits in the fossil record, requires a Creator, and is actually observable today in plants. I don't know why we keep trying to debunk Darwin when his isn't the only theory around, and it's quite a bad one even as a scientific theory.

What i dont understand is that hole on the bottom of the skull , The small skull has the hole on the bottom so why not then , is it not human . It stood up right like us.. I know it was small and had monkey features but the hole is in the same spot as us.

9:30 It's good that creation scientists are finally admitting the science. Even the creationist in this video cannot deny that there are "startling" correspondences in the patterns of DNA in the biosphere, and that merely explaining them away by saying that "God did it that way" is "unsatisfying".

What fascinating content. It makes sense that we can have fairly noticeable variation among our fellow human kind. We are made with clear adaptive abilities in order to better survive in our different environments. Evolution is such an intellectually dishonest worldview that censors the very evidence supporting the biblical narrative.

Adam was one man who was different because he was made in God’s image (spirit) and that doesn’t preclude creatures EXACTLY like Adam physically, but not given the spirit of God… why is this so difficult?

Bob's wife here: Dont people groups all over the world have different types of brow bones? Some larger close to Neanderthals?

If people approached science with a belief in the validity of the Bible as their starting point it’s really not difficult at all to comprehend the origins of everything in creation.

Ape skull is a lot different than a man's skull, end of story

You just explained that the non-neanderthal skull was from an animal that walked upright on two legs, and said it couldn't be one of the apes, monkeys, or chimpanzees, because their foramen magnun is in the back. If it walked upright, and wasn't one of the other three, and it's not human, than what is it?

How do we know someone with agenda didnt create that skull on 3d printer

The age old question is still unanswered... if man evolved from apes, why are there still apes?

There has to be something really broken in the people that want so desperately to believe in evolution and a Godless world that they are driven to disprove God or creation theory instead of letting facts and ancient knowledge tell the story. They act like they're the enlightened ones for trying so hard to put us at the same level or even beneath other animals. The desire based masses that cannot allow a moral based belief system. A belief in God doesn't mean we aren't also on a spiritual journey or a scientific exploration of everything we can see or touch...

Ok Dr Todd Wood. Tell where the line i that you say you can determine.

Animals, especially domestic, can bond unconditionally. We humans possess the the higher intelligence, yet are saddled with the sin problem.

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16 KJV John 3:17, KJV: "For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved."

Know this first of all, that in the last days mockers will come with their mocking, following after their own lusts... (2 Peter 3:3) The fool has said in his heart, “There is no God.” (Psalm 14:1) And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. (Revelation 20:15)

I don’t by the neanderthal thing y’all mentioned. I know it’s just a theory but that would mean that Adams kids would have had to be all genetically different or Noah’s children would have. Even if you argue that it’s in our genome from matting, and genes always have a way of coming out of everyone at some point, then why isn’t there none born today with those traits?

When so much of the jungles dried up, we had to quickly evolve to live on the plain. Upright posture allowed more efficient travel than knuckle walking,and it freed the hands to throw stone at predictors and use digging sticks to dig up roots and tubers and bash skills and bones for marrow along with animals to eat,since our Garden of Eden with easy fruit and greens no loner was there for us. Ways to survive,communicating ways to use simple stick and rock tools to get food required the evolution of the brain. Genesis can be appreciated as a beautiful and memorable. metaphor. A religious thought is that God works in mysterious ways.Studying evolution allows for the pondering with amazement at the sacred depths of nature.

Trying to disprove what you're holding in your hand (called facts and reality) with never prove your book right. Nor will it ever give evidence to supernature, or anything that supposedly comes from it. The fallacy of special pleading to a bigger mystery can never be any type of answer.

Though i dont require any proof, i still get a big smile when human science proves scripture.

How about the Nephilim and angel theory?

Key word- 'evolved'. If indeed, we evolved from apes; then we would be digging up and examining their remains. We would not be looking at them- and they looking back.

"The Nephilim were on the earth in those days-and also afterward-when the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown. " Nephilim- (Hebrew: “nepilim”) The term itself almost certainly means ‘fallen ones,’ whether morally fallen in the general sense or fallen from (i.e., cast out of) heaven in a more specific sense. The word is used twice in scripture: Gen. 6:4 and Numbers 13:33 It has been plausibly proposed that the Nephilim were princes born into the royal houses of the ‘sons of God’ (Gen. 6:4) and that they were ‘the mighty tyrants who . . .esteemed their might to be their right.’ Certain Jewish exegetes have ingeniously assumed that the later Nephilim strain of Num 13:33 was preserved through the Flood in the persons of Noah’s daughters-in-law. The literature of the intertestamental period, however, takes a different track. According to Sir 16:7 the ‘ancient giants’ were rebellious and deserved divine punishment. Wisd. 14:6 and Bar.3:26-28 are even more specific: The giants were destroyed by the Flood. If so, the later Nephilim were namesakes, not descendants, of their earlier counterparts.” (New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and Exegesis, 1997) Virtually every ancient culture has an account of gods or star people or angels who produce offspring on the earth: Sumer, Assyria, Egypt, Incas, Mayans, Babylon, Persians, Greece, India, Bolivia, South Sea Islands, Sioux Indians.

I have a body and a pulse, also a personality. Remove anyone of these and I'm no longer me.

A lot of comes down to two different world views. A person whose worldview includes a creating God and a worldview where that creating God cannot exist. Bible says God let there be light and science explains the process by how that light works...they aren't fighting eachother...its about 2 world views that are competing.

So much confidence in The Line Drawn. Why cant I draw the line?