You are so right

No need in testing them on my rifle as this is the rifle they are used on mostly.

Have to be the luckiest person. I am sorry but I have not seen a Christensen shoot well at all

@Dayattherange at 50 it's a ragged hole, sub moa at 100... my 10 year old son shoots it at Lil 2 inch poppers at 100 like it's nothing. Shoot it out to 425 yards regularly and it stays on target. Only issue I had was was about the first 500 rounds was it not ejecting properly, then one day it just started running flawlessly.

@@joshuascout5549 I was in a rush to get one of the first ones. It had to be sent back to the factory for ejection issues I forget now the two things they told me they had to fix. I wish m experience would have been the same.

@Dayattherange trust me I was about to sale it cause a rifle that jams like that due to ejection was junk... then it just worked itself out. I keep it in the deer stand with me. There is a branch at 105 yards that squirrels come out on. Bullet hitting the squirrel is louder than the gun going off. It loves eley target and rws target. Wish you had a better experience with yours.

Combination of suppressor causing the rifle to become dirtier sooner than with out

The rifle was clean prior just got really dirty with the cans. Me and the owner talked about the same thing in using a bolt gun next time. I do like your thoughts about shooting no can then can. Though I stil felt like I learned alot at least one of those things were 22cans really aren't heavy enough on a steel barrel to have a change in point of impact. I also learned that EVEN with 22CANS you will still get a very dirty action which honestly I never considered previously. ALL of them had a little blowback through the action which really surprised me. Though as I was telling him if I change rifles for the next test I will be crucified here for changing rifles so I feel I need to finish out with the top 3 cans and then maybe start a new series with a bolt action.

@@Dayattherange I always get a POI shift with my cans I didn’t know about the whole first shot thing being the one that pressurizes the can until I saw a video on it where they were measuring the db - big difference after the can loaded up on the first round One video I saw a guy fill his can with gel to prevent that issue - it seemed to work but no way I’m doing that 😂 Cans are definitely dirty beasts I enjoy them but don’t use them for precision anymore as I’ve never seen a top benchrest or F-Class shooter use then so that tells me something

Yes

It's been going on for over 20 years now I am not so sure. There are to many that want to shoot and protect their hearing more

I wish the nfa would go away, it would be nice to have been able to protect my hearing. If they were legal, and more importantly used by the military the va wouldn’t have had to spend 2500 on hearing aids for me.

I take it they didn't give you earplugs. I know of artillery folks suffering that did have ear protection but guessing the sound and pressure waves travel through the body and into the ear canal. I have doubts however the 22 lr especially shooting match ammo or subsonic ammo would have that effect. I couldn't agree with you more about the nfa.@@jefflayton5889