Do ship world wide

I think i will get one Edit: i got one

amogus

cen you do whu is most senior heir of sultans of al andalus todey and kings of bosnia todey

Why isn't he called Karl the Great in English? :D

Charles the simp

@@cumaproto9466 Charles the

Better than being called "the bald" or "the fat" lol

What bout charles the fat

@@patrick40592 funnily enough, no one during the time called him charles the fat. He was only called that hundreds of years after his death by geneologists.

side note: she is about to resign and Charles will be King effectively. They have it all within their grip and always have. shit.

@@highmanbeing1591 The queen will not resign.

@@LunaNicoleTheFox lets see :)

Empress Matilda would be proud of her 💂

Also, monarchs don't "resign." It's called "abdicating."

He definitely already knows every single line he's potentially or certainly connected to.

Darling, he knows. If there's any one thing today's Monarchs know is their entire ancestry.

@@amylathrop8329 I expect he looks at a chart almost exactly like this every morning when he wakes up

We all have Charlemagne in our blood, if you have european descendants in your blodline.

Same here

You'd need to "peacefully" convince like tens of thousands of people to "step-aside". Anyways I'm in, sounds like something that should be televised, let's call it the "royal olympics", or "game of THE throne", or "right by might"

@@jguillermooliver Not true. There were plenty of peasants.

I am also descendant of Charlemagne as l am the 18th great grandsons of King Charles VI ("the mad") of France on my mother side of the family...

After we got to the Dukes of Saxony I finally clued in.

Elizabeth II: I am inevitable.

As someone who's gone to Elizabeth II's wikipedia page and just clicked "Father" in the infobox over and over and over again before, as soon as we got to the house of Wettin I had that feeling too :)

You're more knowledgible than me then. I thought when we got to the House of Wettin we'd wind up on the pretenders of Poland-Lithuania

@@ByzantineDarkwraith So I'm not the only one then I did that for every current european royal house and the House of Welf was the oldest I could track

Charlie has said himself that he is descended from Vlad the Impaler - having looked into his & the family's behaviour & history - that's when one can say, the apple does not fall far from the tree - Research the royal families of Europe will bring a much more balanced truth.

It fell a long from the tree. From Germany all the way to England.

@@frank-ko6de Charlemagne was not German ?????? I'm talking about King Charles III family tree. Which goes back to Charlemagne King of the Frank's who later became the French. However, Charlemagne was born in Leige in modern day Belgium, so not that far away and not Germany.

@@johnbrereton5229 Actually very far away and through so many centuries and millions of people. It's not direct.👍👍👍👍

@@frank-ko6de All our ancestors go back through millions of people through many centuries but they still lead directly to their descendants.

Yeah I just noticed that.

this is why I mostly dont trust these charts. they are fun thought experiments but ultimatly this person isnt a historian. The lines that often get drawn in these family trees are sketchy aswell...

Bl. Hildegard is more applicable, because she was _regionally_ venerated around Kempten -- a monastery she founded.

@@HansWurst1569this is more or less accurate

We finally beat Crusader Kings!

The legitimate King of England lived in Australia. His daughter should be Queen.

King Ralph

No, that arguement is meaningless since Elizabeth's ancestor, Henry VII took the throne by right of conqeust

@@matteusconnollius1203 Stole*

@@eternalvigilance5697 Do you think a deity came down and gave King Richard his seal of approval for the throne? Nobody has anybody right to the throne except by being able to use strength to ocnquer it and having the support of people. "Stealing" thrones are meaningless, conquests is how people get thrones anyway

But the last person who ruled by claiming the title of Caesar of Rome was named Nicolas

Well, I won't say the Eastern Roman Empire part needs twisting. Constantine the Great did build Constantinople, and Constantine XI did die with the city. And they both had moms named Helena.

@@Nairda2042 Constantine was around before the Empire officially and permenantly split in 395, many years after he died. So one COULD say he never ruled the Byzantine Empire (or Eastern Rome), that is why I say "twist it" . Though if Roman Constantinople itself, then one could say Constantine to Constantine

@@keithharper32 You really live up to your name. Nah jk. But who even really takes that seriously today?

Ayy batran99 nice to see you still alive and kicking, i remember the old mapping days...

His name was Karolus Magnus, born, bred, and crowned in German-speaking area. He would never have a French name!

They tend to catch the interest of students who are, well ... already interested in history. You might need something flashier and less detailed for the other variety of students, to draw them in, in their moments of distraction staring at the walls. (Don't underestimate the importance of subtle psychological ploys) ;)

I’ve taught mediaeval history to Year 8. It was kind of fun. I hope you enjoy!

Hey, maybe he's only incoherent to humans, maybe his plants understand him perfectly well.

😂

Wouldn’t be surprised if Liz was the heir under that line too. Lots of crossing of the streams.

I wouldn't trust a comment from a user literally called "Untrue Lie"

The chart has been simplified a lot. Ermengarde also had a sister Gerberga, it actually is not known who of them was first born (I myself suspect Gerberga). Her descendants are the counts of Leuven (later Brabant) and Gelre. This line continues via the house of Burgundy to the current king of Spain. Ermengarde's line went from Namur to Luxemburg. This continues via the Duch house of van Egmont into the still existing house of De Riquet de Caraman (title of Prince)

@@Just-A-Little-Magic Thank you. I was confused because I had once researched the Brabant line and it didn't appear on this chart.

@@eX1st4132 Why? It means that I'm speaking the truth. 😉 It's just a little philosophical joke.

That’s better than me…I’m American and the sht just goes ‘poof’ into the night. I could trace my ancestors to the ‘Harrisons and the Harringtons’ from northern England who came across on the Boat in the early 1900s. Then it’s all blank.

@@mamavswild have you tried Y dna?

What do you mean, true or not?

I've traced my family back as well. If you can go back enough just to find a titled European in your tree, just follow them and they will get you there 😁

mathematically speaking everybody today, who is of European ancestry is related to Charlesmagne

@@marknum545 🤔…I’m married to a European, so-does that mean I’m related to Charlemagne too?(!)….

@@Sedgewise47 At least you married into a branch of his dynasty ;) and your children will be his fully legitimate descendants. :D

@@marknum545 This is an often repeated claim, but a false one, as it is only based on the maths of a clean blood-line. This does not factor in cousin marriages or incest. For instance: from Charles II of Spain back to Philip I of Castile = 5 male ancestors, but 7 female. Besides, I like to believe there are more descendants from Windukind, the Saxon king, then from Charlemagne.

So he could get to the queen of England, which makes for a cooler video. That’s my cynical answer. I don’t have a real answer

Indeed. All through the first 15 minutes he keeps pushing the salic law and semi salic law argument and that just suddenly gets thrown out of the window in the last 5 minutes...

Probably since Beatrice inherited the County of Burgundy? It would fit the theme of following who actually became heir.

Cause then it goes to eventually conflate with the Habsburgs when Joana of Spain marries Philip of Habsburg, and we already know how that "died out". Just don't remember who's the oldest among Charles V and Ferdinand. If it's Charles, then the best claim belongs to Philip VI of Spain. If Ferdinand is older, then it belongs to the Head of the House of Habsburg-Lorraine (who I don't know who is). ... Or maybe it ends in King Sebastian of Portugal (since Manuel I married the older sister of Joana), but that line died out.

@@WreckageHunter no no He will come. In a morning with fog.

Same

I don’t delude myself in any way that I’m related to anyone famous, royal, etc. My ancestors were hard-working Irish and German immigrants who made their ways to New York City in the 1840s-1850s. They did well for themselves and I’m grateful to them for the life I have today.

@@cak813 If you go back a thousand years your ancestors are so numerous it becomes a bit of a math problem between 1 trillion if nobody married anyone related to them to billions or hundreds of millions. It's kind of like doubling a 1 cent coin over a month becomes a ridiculous number. Obviously thats not possible when people live in the same village for hundreds of years and absolutely do marry their relatives but it's very likely if you go back 1000 years at least someone will have been important and put into history books or papers to deal with inheritances or military things. After all you are a descendant of people who survived very hard times so it's very likely some of them were extraordinary. If they werent then your line would have died off at some point

@@oddursigurdsson9637 Thanks for your kind words. You know what it is? I’m in several genealogy groups on Facebook and I get sick of hearing (delusional) people making all kinds of claims that they’re related to royalty, Presidents, actors, people on the Mayflower, etc. Some of them may be (I know it takes a great deal of documentation to become a member of the Mayflower Society or a Son or Daughter of the Revolution) but even if they are, does that make them a better person? It merely gives them bragging rights for a few seconds. Last year, I discovered that a great-grand uncle on my father’s side of the family had fought (for the Union) in the Civil War. I was beyond thrilled. He had only come to the US from Germany two years before and he was 21 when he signed up to join the infantry in April 1861. He was wounded at the Second Battle of Bull Run in August 1862 and he was honorably discharged in December 1862. If he had been a general, I couldn’t be prouder of him. If someone has proof of their lineage, I love hearing about it. It’s the fanciful stories I object to.

but how do you do it?

@@fuseydunae397 I was bedridden from surgery and spent a lot of time on Ancestry and chasing down lines that went somewhere

Spain is also where the Bourbons take you. Spain is also a major theater for the Bonapartists. The Spanish Empire also ruled more of the New World than any other government in history, Indigenous or European. If you manage to unite the Spanish, British, and French Empires at their greatest extents together...... Well you basically get NATO lol.

​@@darthparallax5207Does Nato have the steam achievement though?

I imagine exactly the same thing. He played fast with the rules to get the Queen as senior heir, which 1- she isn't, and 2- a protestant couldn't claim succession to a title that was bestowed by the papacy, thus, any claim of heirship coming from the house of Wettin would be illegitimate

it's hard to say considering this is before the great schism, let alone the reformation personally I say no considering this is still about the most senor heir to Charlemagne, and not the most legitimate claimant to Holy Roman Emperor

@@stephenlewis4197 Ach! You're right; I conflated "heir to Charlemagne" and "Holy Roman Emperor," which are not the same thing. My apologies.

@@riograndedosulball248 "Defender of the Faith" was a title given by the reigning Pope to Henry VIII which was passed on to the present day despite the Anglican schism.

kent was cut off succession

Didn't his sons instantly begin warring with each other over the spoils once he died? Idk if that was so great of him

@L-Goldwood All of them. Every human being is a family member if you go distant enough.

Did you come across an ancestor called Sir Guy de Bryan by any chance?

Your majesty 🤴

Every European has Charlemagne for a 43rd Great grandfather 😂 (or 41,42,44 depending on your individual age)

@@retroactivejealousy-worldl1805 he is in my ancestry

It was Alfonso VII, by the way. Alfonso VI was the father of his mother Urraca .

@@avantelvsitania3359 And good lord are they fun to play in CK3. Urraca's a dirty girl (so is Alfonso, but as I was playing him, I tried to get him to end what they were doing), but damn she's clever.

I believe semi-salic law jumps to a grandson before it goes to a brother.

@@jayit6851 Is there any country where this has been applied? Russia used semi-Salic law, but the sons of Grand Duchess Xenia, who would have been female-line grandsons of Alexander III and the closest living male heirs to Nicholas II, were passed over in favor Grand Duke Kirill, of the son of Alexander III's brother. Same in Hannover, Victoria would have been the closest female heir to William, but was passed over in favor of a brother. Wiki's description of the law is thus: "The so-called Semi-Salic version of succession order stipulates that firstly all-male descendance is applied, including all collateral male lines; but if all such lines are extinct, then the closest female agnate (such as a daughter) of the last male holder of the property inherits, and after her, her own male heirs according to the Salic order." "all collateral male lines" seems to indicate to me that ALL male dynasts must be exhausted before a woman or her heirs can succeed.

@lex ora No they are proper royalty because they don't bow down to a pope.

Me too. Unless you are British or in one of the Kingdoms, that nugget would fly right past the rest of the world.

@@Cdr_Mansfield_Cumming I was hoping for it to be someone else of some minor royal family somewhere and to learn something new about that family, but no, of course is the British Royal family. I mean, how could it not be? 😒

Yes, I thought that as well. In this case, the current "rightful heir" would be Karl of Habsburg(-Lorraine). Technically, he is an agnatic member of the House of Châtenois-Vaudémont, which is one of the oldest agnatic noble houses in Europe.

@@untruelie2640 He is an agnatic descendant of the Etichonid/Habsburg dynasty, from which the House of Habsburg and the House of Châtenois/Lorraine are descended. That's one, if not the main reason for why the children of Maria Theresa kept calling themselves Habsburgs. Charles VI of the HRE (Maria Theresa's father) searched for the true genealogy of Francis of Lorraine, discovering that the House of Lorraine and the House of Habsburgs were agnatically the same house. Many historians say that the House of Lorraine is actually descended from the Gerardides, but the Lorraines haplogroup contradicts that. If they were descendants of the Gerardides, their haplogroup would be common in northern Europe instead of being common in southwest Germany and Switzerland (Alemannic-speaking regions). That's why I stick with the Historians that claim that they descend from the Etichonids, because the Etichonids were from Alsace (an Alemannic region), and Lorraines being ancestors of Alemannics while having an alemannic haplogroup has sense.

@@nicks5636 I'm not sure about that. As far as I know, written evidence only points to a descendancy of the House of Châtenois from the Gerardides/Gerhardines. The genetic factor isn't a watertight proof, since it only describes broad categories. The first Gerardides were counts in a number of regions (Paris, Toulouse, Angoulême, Metz) and in carolingian times, fiefdoms were only given out for a lifetime; the vassals also came often from very distant parts of the realm, so we can't be sure were the Gerardides really originated from. Also, the common heritage thing seems to be a little bit TOO convenient. It suited the needs of the Habsburgs perfectly, because it meant that their dynasty nominally wasn't wiped out. Thanks to this "fitting discovery", they effectively absorbed the House of Vaudémont instead of it absorbing them. Also, the connection between the Etichonids and the Habsburgs is unreliable at best.

@@untruelie2640 The thing is that there is no written evidence pointing to a descendancy of the House of Châtenois from the Gerardides/Gerhardines, neither to the Etichonid Dynasty. The main argument for the Historians that claim that Lorraines descend from the Gerardides is the name "Gerard", while the main claims for the Historians that claim that Lorraines descend from the Etichonids are: the close relatives of the founder of the House of Lorraine used "d'Alsace" as surname, implying descendance from the Etichonids (rulers of Alsace); and a letter from 1038 of Remiremont abbey that says that Gerard's father was Count of Alsace (implying descendance from the Etichonids again). To all of this add the haplogroup that matches the Etichonids (the origin of the Gerardides is known, and it is northern Francia, they ruled in Paris and even in Normandy before getting Metz, so it can't match with them).

@@untruelie2640 From Eticho I come the counts in the Nordgau, then Lancelin of the Breisgau, from who the counts of the Klettgau descend, and from them the house of Habsburg.

Also just bought the chart and am happy I got it in time!

By this time the old salic way of succession was replaced by the male *preferenced* primogeniture, which means that if you (the king) have no sons the title doesn't go to your brother, but your oldest daughter, even if she has no son at the time. Only if you have no children at all your brother would inherit the title. If they kept the old way of succession, then the title of "most senior heir of Charlemagne" would go with the title of King of Castille. Here things get tricky a few generations down, when Alfonso XI wasn't able to father a legitimate, but his title got inherited by his oldest illegimate son. Eventually the crown of castille would end up on the head of the Habsburg kings. So the title of "most senior heir of Charlemagne" would belong to Karl Habsburg, today's head of the Habsburg family. But only if we ignored the change in succession law.

I was thinking exactly that 🤔, I imagine is Louis Alphonse de Bourbon duke D'Anjou the cousin of the king of Spain.

Not Felipe VI because of semi salic law, so it would be the carlists claimants

@@enriquematorrasmunoz9753 it would be but the Carlist claimant is extinct

That video is about de most senior heir (by blood) not the person who would be holy Roman emperor today

@@maarysb26 I talking about the chart.

It was obvious he was rooting for Elizabeth II

Because salic law ignores cousins unless semi-salic doesn't get any legit heir.

he said because most other monarchies did follow male preference primogeneture so it would make sense that they would change the law according to what most monarchies did at that point. But it would've been SO interesting to see the other line as well! I hope there will be a second part!

@@ace_bean7011 Male preference primogeneture wasn't in much practice in the German states, they used Salic law, so this argument seem rather hollow.

Because Alfonso VI had no surviving sons, so her line was more senior?

I just looked up Semi Salic law the position can be passed down to a female. Although the female's son will inherit the title. Therefore this is a whole heap CROC OF SHIT. Therefore if you rewatch this fake video propaganda for British Royalty. You will notice rventhough they say they was doing semi salic law, which can be passed down to a daughter although her son would inherit the title. This means my family could be the Senoor Heir of Charlemagbe. If you watch this video again you will see they skipped Lothaiir I daughter Ermangarde of Lower Lorraine. Which means it would go to Rainier I of Lorraine. Thus means the Senior Heir of Charlemagne would be from a descendant of Zachary Taylor the 12th President of the United States. Which is scary because he is my 2nd Generation Great Grandfather.

You need to read more history. The meaning if Salic and semi-Salic law changed over the centuries and was applied differently in different countries and at different times. Not to mention of the law of Greater Army Diplomacy. Unfortunately, might often made right. Otherwise there's a guy living in Canada who might have been King of England.

What if they took this chart and continued it all the way to today?

I was thinking this... any idea if they have living descendants? Do the Spanish Bourbons descend from them through a woman or two?

The King of Spain is the real heir. Matt just wanted to play because he is an Anglo. 😂

If we go down Alfonso VI's line, the heir would be Karl von Habsburg.

@@angusyang5917 Wrong, the senior is Charles I king of Spain and V HRE. Felipe II his son is the senior one, not his brother Thus the Habsburg - Lothringen is not senior but FELIPE VI is the most senior. The only one who can fight The title is Louis XX de Bourbon, the chief of the Capet dynasty and the head of the House of Bourbon

​@@ByzantineDarkwraith From what I read, Philip V of Spain got his legitimacy from his grand-mother Maria Theresa, wife of Louis XIV of France and daughter of Philip IV of Spain, of the House of Habsburg. Her ancestor Charles V got the throne of Spain through his mother Joanna the Mad, who descends from Alfonso VII (not VI, as it is written in the chart) from both her parents, Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile. If I read correctly, then King Felipe VI of Spain should be considered Charlemagne's heir. Although Luis Alfonso de Bourbon is actually the senior member of House Bourbon, so maybe he should be considered Charlemagne's heir. The legitimists consider that he has the best claim to the throne of France.