Russian historian and aircraft engineer Mark Solonin in his books confirmed V. Suvorov's theory with thousands of references from the Rusiian and German archives. This is simply proved. Iron proofs...

Some people are desperately trying to debunk so many authors, it's incredible. I am reading his The Chief Culprit and its an outstanding book.

Biggest military build-up in history by Stalin.. Suvorov was right. You are a coping brainwashed normie.

This was debunked in "Stumbling Colossus: The Red Army on the Eve of World War " by David Glantz , published by University Press of Kansas. Further to this , the Germans overran many Soviet Army & Corps HQs in 1941 , and never came up with any "Operational Plans" , nor even any "Warning Orders" in which Commanders tell their subordinates to start planning. The mind believes what the heart wants it to.

Nah, he's wrong.

Corvallito I would wholeheartedely advise to reconsider you system, if it came into place as a result of Suvorovs work. He is one of the late old wave propagandists. His books carry a very fiction like character, the evidence is cherry picked, the thesis flawed. They do not stand up to criticizm, but they do make a good reading of how to inverse history. In order to fix his damage, it took me a good part of 4 years of constant study, which he inflicted with just 2 weeks of reading! I had the misfortune of endulging in all his works, and have been his fan for longer then i can be proud of. But heed this, he is a fraud, to remove his imprint it will take alot of indepth study. It will not be easy, but the one who searches, shall find.

Try learning to spell.

+Leman Russ Thank you! I saw this peculiar video title and was suspicious : why are we still arguing about who started WW2? Who would argue like this, if he had nothing to hide? Indeed, why the "War Guilt" clause in the Treaty of Versailles if there was no doubt? I thought that was all decided, who was "evil" and who was Righteous. But, yes! There is a lot that has been hidden!

+Major Rugburn Well, yes. It is "propaganda", in the original sense of advertising a position or point of view in a succinct manner intended to create interest in the subject. Propaganda is not an argument and was never intended to do anything other than create an interest in the subject. "Ford Tough" is a propaganda slogan. You're well advised to get the specs before you actually open your wallet. If you were a historian, you would know that. The word became a pejorative during the world wars, when only the Allies told the truth and the Central or Axis put out "propaganda". There is an interesting contemporary NYT article that actually does analyze Axis propaganda and it is accurate enough, although it ignores Allied propaganda which was similar but focused on a few other tenants but which also appear in other analysis of propaganda. This, in itself, is a major part of the WW2 Myth propagated by the victors. Check out American or British WW2 propaganda images. They seem actually pretty ridiculous, today. But they were taken seriously enough at the time. Then, look at the propaganda that comes out of gov't, now. There is a discernible trend in it and it is useful in catching the current lies.

@@leman7277 Shill.

It was not a mistake, they had an agenda behind being aggressive towards Germany.

Reichsfuehrer Nivea Creme en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icebreaker_(Suvorov) Suvorov's view ... not shared by the majority of historians. Glantz views Suvorov's argument as "incredible" on a variety of fronts: first, Suvorov rejects without examination classified ex-Soviet archival material, and makes highly selective picks from memoirs. Glantz points to this as a serious methodological flaw. Further, Glantz argues, Suvorov's thesis is strongly contradicted both by ex-Soviet and German archival material, and the facts do not support the argument that the Red Army was prepared to invade Germany.[1] On the contrary, the appalling lack of readiness, poor training level, and abysmal state of deployments show that the Red Army was unprepared for static defense, much less large-scale offensive operations. For his part, however, Suvorov not only admits his selectiveness but justifies his methods, recalling his work in the intelligence community David Brandenberger notes that recently published pre-1941 German analysis of Soviet military readiness also does not support the major Icebreaker's thesis demonstrating that Soviet preparations were assessed to be "defensive" by German intelligence."[4] Although Suvorov claims that an attack date of July 6, 1941 had been selected, this is contradicted by the evidence as presented by Glantz and others. There were no stockpiles of fuel, ammunition, and other stores held in forward areas as would have been needed if an invasion was about to be mounted. Major ground units were dispersed into small garrisons rather than being concentrated at railheads, as they would have been had they been preparing an invasion. Units were not co-located with their own transportation assets, leaving, for example, major artillery units immobile. Over 50% of all Soviet tanks required major maintenance on June 22, 1941. If an invasion were being planned, these maintenance tasks would have been completed. Most Soviet armor units were in the process of re-organizing into newTank Corps; the German invasion caught these units in the midst of this reorganization. Such a large-scale reorganization is inconsistent with an impending invasion. The origin of Suvorov's thesis may lie in the fact that Marshal Zhukov did suggest a pre-emptive strike on Germany early in 1941. Zhukov recalled this plan later but claimed either that the plan was rejected by Stalin or didn't reach the leader at all. This doesn't sound too convincing, though, as military historian Mikhail Meltyukhov has pointed out. First, it is hard to believe Zhukov's claim that he had given the top secret document to a secretary so that the latter could deliver it to Stalin. Second, the claim by Suvorov rejectors that the document doesn't have signatures really proves nothing. It is known that during those years official military documents were almost exclusively passed without proper formatting.[5] Icebreaker cites over 140 sources, mostly published memoirs and speeches of Soviet military officers participating in the war.[6] Summarising the western scholars' opinion on Icebreaker Hugh Ragsdale concludes that the book is "generally considered discredited" by now,[7] whereas Jonathan Haslam notes that Suvorov's claims "would be comical were it not taken so seriously".[8] According to the latter, "there is a significant segment of opinion in Germany that wishes to rehabilitate the Nazi past, and the end of the Soviet regime created an atmosphere favorable to the publication of the book." It is worth noting, however, that Suvorov draws much of his support from the former communist states of Eastern Europe, not just Germany.[citation needed]

***** you selectively forget about Munich Treaty which actally betrayed Chekhoslovakia and Poland and was aimed on bringing Germany to Russia's border to start the war!

Василий Батарейкин Some of us obviously have more free time available to us than others. I do not have time to refute each of your statements, point for point, so let me concentrate on "the forest" and not the leaves on the trees. First of all, the agreement of a majority of historians is not needed to establish truth. Most "historians" do not study history, but merely regurgitate what others have already written. Second, when it comes to Soviet Russia, truth, fiction, myth, and total fabrication are almost indistinguishable. What is declared "truth" one moment by a Soviet government can be declared a lie the next day. So relying on any official Soviet proclamation or documentation is an exercise in self deception. Third, and this is the key point, Suvorov's views are the ONLY views which explain the actions of both the Nazis and the Communists during and after WW2 from a common sense, LOGICAL viewpoint. For example, let me just ask you one question, which, if you can answer credibly, will destroy Suvorov's argument . . . but you cannot answer it. If the Soviet Union had no aggressive intentions, and never intended to conquer Europe, and only reacted defensively to Nazi aggression . . . why then did they refuse to withdraw from territories that they had agreed to withdraw from prior to the war's end? Why did they occupt half of Germany and half of Europe and build an Iron Curtain to keep their captured populations imprisioned? Why did they fight a 30 year cold war with their former allies, the U.S. and Britain, if it was only about ending the Nazi threat??? I eagerly await your answer.

Reichsfuehrer Nivea Creme the betrayer Rezun never had access to the archives, all his books are mere assumptions and propaganda, he would say anything what CIA told him to let him stay in US and avoid the prison for betrayals. if the opinion of historians is nothing to you then I think I will not be able to convince you and you you are narrow-minded and stubborn enough to prevent me from wasting time on useless explanations to nazi-lover vlike you.

Exactly. The great Soviet Seal doesn't have borders because the whole world was supposed to be one great Soviet empire.

@@readtellthetruthandshamethed More like One Great North Korea... Gulags for everyone and everyone equal(y)... poor.

Salute to him and Edward Snowden the US counterpart as well as all honest americans

He is a liar.

@@user-jv3mm6vt6e pochemu. so enlighten us and tell us why

@@awe3715 it takes too much time, for that end read Isaev's book about him or watch the video of TIK about "preemptive strike" theory.

@@awe3715 He is an Alex Jones /Dmitry Yezhov /Heinrich Himmler style superstar whose crazy ideas and words came into prominence in the times of mass psychosis of the 90's russia when everybody had suddenly become so antisocialist that they praised Hitler for every move. He just took himself too seriously afterwards and didn't step down in his best. That's it. He was a phenomenon of the tip of the delusional eastern European iceberg of hate and euphoria of the 90s, not a figuregead, let alone "an honest man". He is not even a scam, not even a joke, simply a daunting shadow of a dumb past who takes himself too seriously.

He isn't Even the most antisoviet peers of him outright hate him because they see him for what he is Glantz hates him Beevor hates him Mark hates him Isaev hates him Nearly all of his established well known peers who climbed their way into prominence by years of research hate, him.

Он средний чувак в ГРУ, даже не офицер, откуда взялись у него такие огромные кусочки информации о советских спец операциях? Очевидно! От БОГА! ОН ЕЩЁ И ЕСТЬ ПРОРОК! Всегда есть такие люди как вы и он, для которых нарратив важнее фактов, и поверьте, несмотря на количества ваших темных тупых бессмысленных слов о том как он "прав", он всё ещё врёт.

@@user-jv3mm6vt6e What exactly are the standards for being an historian? On a par with being an engineer? Surgeon? Architect? Veterinarian? Even a mechanic? Anyone with an average IQ and knows how to read and write can be an historian. Some of our best historians were diarists and prolific chroniclers of the times via personal letters they penned to family or acquaintances. Historians are generally hacks with some kind of religious, social, and/or religious agenda.

@@valentinius62 you are wrong. Academic historians are different.

@@user-jv3mm6vt6e Согласна. Примерно на 4-5 минуте его повествования стало абсолютна ясна его цель. Если вам попадется достойная публикация по этой теме ,так же Молотов - Риббентроп , плиз, сбросьте ссылку.

+SirSmokeAlot vice versa germans murdering Poles in Grand Duchy of Poznań, Upper Silesia and Prussia. german minority HAD 34 seats in Polish sejm while NO POLE was in Reichstag!

@@aleksanderjuliangronowski8335 that’s just utter complete nonsense.

those 15 million were stranded not after Versailles, but after Potsdam.

@@freckleheckler6311 As a Pole i am so happy that your kind is so alergic to real history and prefer to believe in your own version of history that paint you as the victim of the international law... For centuries you were acting like that(a criminal) and noone was paying attention in the West... but that changed and it is so funy to see how butthurt you are because of it! Versailles Treaty completely ignored Poland, GDP on Polish territory droped to only 13% of the GDP of 1914 but somehow you got a reason to be mad? Attaked Poland because Versailles Treaty forced you to pay ZERO to Poland... Nice theory, especialy when wecompare it with the one presented here in the video...

england.

Thank you for the recommendation, I'll look for it.

@@sumosami The Rothschilds to be even more precise.

Putin via Wagner put less than 30,000 prisoners in uniform. Get your head out of your ass Mr Dunning Kruger.

The end of the Cold War was signaled when Poland in 1989 stoped playing with communism! That Reunion of Germans got nothing to do with it. You can literally claim from that theory that Germany was an ally of France, Britain and USA if the split caused by the WW2 was the most important thing for the Western. Everything that is somehow conected to Poland is hiden under the carpet, to this day UK is hiding some of the documents conected to Polish case in WW2->like death of the top commander of Polish forces in the West gen. Sikorski(died in accident with all his staff and the only survivor was Czech pilot of that plan -> what a lucky guy, so sad that no other pilot after him got so much luck in this type of accidents). Examples: Wacław Struszyński that created antena for Huff-Duff system is never mentioned, guy that made the one invention that allowed British and USA win the war owith U-Boots is somehow missing in action and importance of his invention is very rarely mentioned in Western historical sources. Tree Polish matematicians that broke the Enigma code, created the theory for that and tools for automated decoding of the code? Nope, Brits made a movie about Turing and literally rewrited in it the whole history from A to Z and Americans decided to give an Oscar for that. AK and ZWZ destroyed German logistic... ofc West is repeating Soviet lie about "Russian winter"... funy how that Russian winter was blowing up trains, tracks and train bridges constantly on the territory of Second Polish Republic not in Russia... In 1946 British made victory parade in Londyn and Polish soldiers were not even invited to no offend comrade Stalin. Polish generals were also not allowed to have military pension when they decided to not go back to Poland after it was sold to Stalin and the funnies part is that Netherlands and Belgium was paying it to them but in secret from the British government. btw. Did you know that Brits after the war charged Poland for planes, bullets, fuel and use of airfields during Battle of Britain? And took money for it instantly from gold reserves that Poland relocated from Poland to UK few days before the WW2 started... Best allies ever!

Yes Churchill knew that NAZIs were plain evil but he didnt get to power until the battle of France 10.05.1940. A war in 1936 - before the Soviets and IIIrd Reich build their war industry would be smart, but not popular and Churchill was smart but yet not popular(not liked at least). Was that 1936 broadcast just after IIIrd Reich reoccupied the Rhine - heart of German war industry. Too bad Chamberlain gave Germans swallow Czech fortifications and factories. In the battle of France 1940 1/3 of IIIrd Reich tanks were build in Czech factories. The Mauser arsenal in the free City of Danzig had to build NAZI rifles too. As for the East Prussia corridor and the Danzig harbor, it helps to have it if you want to shift lots of troops for fast for lighting wars.

"Poland wants war with Germany and Germany will not be able to avoid it even if she wants to." If Germans didnt attack Poland, they would avoid the war that they alone started. Do think about that, how many countries attacked Germany and how many countries were attacked by Germany. Poland knew that giving Germany what it wants will not change anything. Look what happened with Czechoslovakia. Thats why on the 5th of May 1939 Józef Beck - Polish foreign minister said this in the polish parlament: "Peace is valuable and wanted. Our generation was scared by war and it deserves peace. But peace, like all things has its price. In Poland we dont know what unconditional peace is. There is only one thing in the life of men and nations that is priceless. Its Honor." So, Poles were ready to defend their country from Germans. In that sense they "wanted war". But Poland wasnt aggressive towards IIIrd Reich. And Britain wasnt "manipulating Poland", Britain was graduating Poland's independence cause already IIIrd Reich annexed 2 countries. On the other hand IIIrd Reich was ignoring every peace agreement they signed, demanding everything for free and building a huge army cause they didnt want war? They wanted Lebensraum in Ukraine without war?

1. "Hitler just wanted Danzig back" sure, Hitler didnt want the whole of Czechoslovakia, he only wanted the mountains that protect Czechoslovakia from German invasion. 6 months later Prague was in IIIrd Reich! Hitler lied that he wanted only Danzig back is what you mean and he didnt want to give nothing in return. Danzig was the first thing he wanted. Danzig Mauser works and a Harbor for Kriegsmarine outside of RAF range. But you cant get to Ukraine thru Danzig and Hitler wanted Ukraine. 2. Why are you quoting 1936 Churchill? Churchill wasnt in power in 1936. But he knew that NAZIs want to get as strong as possible before war. Churchill was right that in that NAZIs will be the aggressors in the next war. And by 1939 UK started understanding that Chamberlain isnt right, Churchill is. 3. "emphasized that the defeat of Germany and Japan and their elimination from world trade would give Britain a tremendous opportunity to swell her foreign commerce in both volume and profit." So what army that could take Berlin did Britain raise to achieve that goal? Poles were not attacking Berlin, French were not attacking Berlin. They didnt even have plans for that possibility. "emphasized that the defeat of UK and France and their elimination from world trade would give Germany a tremendous opportunity to swell her foreign commerce in both volume and profit." - see what I did there? Its also 100% true. 4."The war was not just a matter of the elimination of Fascism in Germany, but rather of obtaining German sales markets" Churchill didnt want to attack anyone, just cause they were Fascist. Britain didnt want to defeat Franco in Spain. Britain was in war with Germany cause Germany was trying to make its colony from Europe. Was the eastern Europe a sale market? ... Thats why Britain - the ruler of seas - didnt want to see Germany taking Europe by force. Thats why they wanted to prevent any German military victory in Europe. So Britain didnt ant to start a war, it wanted Germany to not take anything by force (not start it or loose it). But if Britain wanted to join the war, Germany had to have a pro-war government, years of military preparations, Ruhr valley and Czech military factories, some kind of pact with the Soviets and they would have to want to attack Poland (like Germany didnt in the 20s). And you think Germany did all of that cause it wanted peace? 5.“When the National Socialists and their friends cry or whisper that this [the war] is brought about by Jews, they are perfectly right.” (The Jewish magazine ‘Sentinel of Chicago’, October 8, 1940) Can you also quote why they are right? Can you quote the sentence before it? I cant find it and it looks like a perfect example of "out of context". Why would National Socialists cry in October 8, 1940? They were winning! If anything "This" dosnt mean "[the war]", it probably means [war suffering caused to the NAZIs by the Jews fighting in WWII] and Im not supersized that Jews didnt want to get annihilated peacefully. 6. Hitlers quote to his advisers: Destroying Poland is our first task! (...) Even if the war will start in the West Poland must fell first. Ill think of a reason for propaganda, it dosnt have to be true (...) Be without mercy, be brutal" 23.08.1939 - day before the Molotov Ribbentrop pact was signed.

What is western and russian propaganda? Hitlers quotes to his generals? Or that Hitlers army had no mercy in Poland just like he said. You believe in Roman catholic propaganda. New York Times headline was "Hitler tells Paris he must get Danzig and the corridor; Berlin thinks door is left open for peaceful solution; British answer today to insist on rights of Poland. This means that Hitler is pushing demands yet again, and hopes that (how did NYT know what Germans really want btw?) they will get everything for free. If Berlin really was open for peaceful solutions, tell me what did it had to offer in return? Or maybe the Berlin diplomats were lying to keep Poland off guard. Poland started mobilization about 12 hours before Germans attacked, mobilized only about 50% of men and had no plans to take Berlin, so it was opened for peaceful solutions. Germans were ready and happy to start the war, and it was preparing for war since Hitler got to power.

@PACIAT PLZ dont be ridicoulus there is no evil in ww2 to talk about because great britain was an evil empire that killed millions of people, in the world over 2 hundred year millions of indigenous people, never uniting them with the uk. churchill sent soldiers to die in ww1 and ww2, both war were started by great britain to mantain his hegemony.

So, if Poland grabbed part of Czechoslovakia when the Germans dismembered that state and Slovakia wasn't happy about it, why is it an issue of they use the Germans to take back their land from the Poles? Also, why would the Western Allies declare on the Soviets when they had nothing to gain by it? Seriously, that would have been insanely stupid and a fast way to lose the war.

@Bob Luke Nope.... Poland occupied a tiny disputed piece of Czechoslovakia in 1938 without a single Czech fatality. They never invaded or even threatened German territory. If you say different, name your source.

Suvorov forgot to mention a detail that Putin invented and promoted in controled by him media few years after this lecture was made? What a surprise... The only secret protocol was in Ribbentrop-Molotov pact as there was map dividing Europe in half betwen this two criminal regimes. Split of Czechoslovakia was decided in Monachium and Poland was not invited there even as an observer. And secret protocol of Ribbentrop-Molotov is not a secret because German copy of it ended in Western Germany so Soviets were unable to destroy it... Literally every single sentence from you contains some lie and "facts" that are in direct contradiction with well known historical facts. Solovakia in 1939 was not an independent country... They attacked Poland because Germans ordered them to do it and what that would have to do with Poland taking some disputed territory from Czechs(without killing even a single Czech)? You do understand that they are not the same nation and have different language and history? And Poles, Czech and Slovaks are the only 3 West-Slavic countries/languages... "They also never declared war on Soviet russia after 17th" You need to declare a war if you attacking someone, the victim of the attack do not need to declare anything as it is fighting on its own territory! And Germany in 1 sep 1939 and Soviets in 17 sept 1939 also forgot to declare War and according to international law that was a war crime... Btw. 16 september 1939 workers of Polish embassies were deprived of all rights resulting from the fact that they were Polish envoys, and the area of ​​the Polish embassy itself was no longer recognized as Polish territory. If Suvorov forgot to mention something, it was all those meetings between the NKVD and the Gestapo in which the NKVD taught younger colleagues how to export millions of civilians into the territory they controlled 6 feet underground! List with dates and locations of this conferences: 27 September 1939 in Brześć October 1939 in Lwów November 1939 in Przemyśl 6-7 December 1939 in Kraków 8-9 December 1939 in Zakopane[ 20 February 1940 in Zakopane March 1940 in Kraków Also here is a nice quote from wikipedia: "The Kama tank school (German: Panzerschule Kama) was a secret training school for tank commanders operated by the German Reichswehr near Kazan, Soviet Union. It operated from 1929 to 1933. The school was established in order to allow the German military to circumvent the military restrictions on tank research spelled out in the Treaty of Versailles. Apart from Kama, for the same reason Germany also operated the Lipetsk fighter-pilot school (1926-33) and a gas warfare facility, Gas-Testgelände Tomka (1928-31). Following the Nazi party's rise to power, the school was closed and Germany's Tank Force and Air Force were trained in Germany. "

In the first winter, none of the 11,000 inmates survived the cold-not even the guards and the dogs. Read Kolyma, Russia's Far Eastern land of gold is better known for the Gulag.

@@twelveyearsnotaslave7868 Read about NKVD doing conferences in Poland in 1939 and 1940 with German equivalent and teaching them all their tricks... Germans were more efficient and more oriented at destruction of Polish people. Gulags were more about free labour force and the fact that many people died in them was not the main purpose for creating them contrary to German camps(but some people were not allowed to leave gulags alive and poliical prisoners in most cases were the first to go as they got the worst treatment). I can also bet that Mark Solonin never visited any German camp, talked with prisoner or read Stanisław Grzesiuk book "Pięć lat kacetu"(5 years of the camp). Grzesiuk ended in camp when he was 19 and left when he was 24 and in his book he is writing his whole experience and how he was able to survive 5 years in a camp where average prisoner lifespan was "whole" 6 months!

churchswill lost the british empire after ww2. britain was bankrupt twice within 25 years. churchswill needed all the colonies to supply, fight, and die for their war they started with Germany. So mismanagement war crimes, getting other countries to do their fighting for them, going bankrupt, heinous war crimes against humanity and innocent citizens. its what they do best!

And who owned Churchill, a mostly failed and broke secret homosexual who lived in a massive estate on 300 pounds parliamentarian's salary.

Germans do not believe generaly in history, 95% of their history is some kind of lie. The whole creation of Germany in the middle of 19th century was posible only because of a lie that was fabricated and published in newspapers to make people mad at France and unite Germans aroud the guy that invented this lie! Every single promise made by Germany was broken by them and that started with 1922 treaty of Rapallo. Soviet union was about to go bankrupt but Germans saved them->and Stalin-> because Bolsheviks made a claim that Soviet Union is not Russia and if they are not Russia then Russian debt is not their debt -> so whole World wanted to boycot them but Germany was the Bolshevik knight on the white horse(not the first time btw. as Germany also was blocking military help to Poland during Soviet-Polish war 1918-1920). And btw. you hero won elections in 1933 only because Stalin via COMINTERN ordered communists to not vote for H. oposition so they voted for him as his program was very similar to theirs.

"some reason" is that there was an agreement between Moscow and London

@@fahrero793 They didn't go through with the agreement. They started the process, but as soon as the British confessed their secret pact with the Polish to defend Poland if it were attacked, Stalin stopped the talks.Immediatly he signed the pact with the Germans, knowing full well that Hitler would end up at war with the British and the French.Hitler wasn't aware of the pact.

@@twelveyearsnotaslave7868 Agree. The Brits were long before the war started pro Russia and against Germany. There is evidence enough that UK wanted that war more than Hitler dd.

@@fahrero793 Maybe read his book -> the one published whole decade before he was elected into power...

The Red Army had taken Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina.They threatened to take over the rest of Romania. Molotov himself recognized they had broken their part of the pact regarding zones of influences. I can't recall exactly what page, but it's in his book The Chief Culprit.

All the proves are listed in the book, it is worth reading. Especially today

It was bc stalin was about to invade. But i think you know that from the jist of your comment.

@@MrAdamchristopher2 I do. Sometimes I try and comment in gestalt fashion so people who can still think will come to their own conclusion. ;-)

Hitler was extremely popular with 90% of Germans by 1940 -- and Stalin ruled by unheard-of levels of fear, torture and murder. Hitler had "only" 10,000 political prisoners by 1938; Stalin millions.

@@johndenugent4185 quite right, the regime with the far bigger kill count at the start of the war was Soviet Union. When the western allies declared war on Germany, the regime at about 0.1% the dead total as Stalin did, yet when this far more monstrous regime (from a 1939 perspective) also invaded Poland a blind eye was turned. Clearly ‘stopping tyranny’ wasn’t actually the motivation of the allies.

@@johndenugent4185 In 1938 Hitler got a model of New Warsaw based on 10% of the population of old Warsaw. The main difference is that he wrote a book with his plan and Stalin was better at pretending that he is the good guy. Germans in 1938 were not even pretending that they are the "good guys" that was invented after the war, just like the story that they did not know about anything when there was 10 millions of copies of the plan for everything! Also during Night of Broken Glass 9-10 November 1938 few times more people than 10,000 were arrested... Where are you people getting all that fake data from?!

+IKveldMedMrHenrix It is sad Britain became the epic Historical hypocrites by not declaring war on the Soviets who did the same thing 2 weeks later

@@RogalloShaolin Read the text of the document that was signed by British government... there is nothing about USSR, the document is all about what they gonna do if Germany gonna attack Poland! So legaly UK was not obligated to do anything in case of Soviet agression. UK was thinking two steps ahead and you people are unable to even see the first step that was already made...

me too

+rctube1958 Great Britain you mean? Probably need to get the country names correct if your trying to grind an axe.

Greeeeeeeeeeat Britian??? how bout the little island that produces nothing worth a damn,,,, Ole USN vet

England and France started WWII. -rctube The BS view of history. Not blaming Hitler is only possible if your totally ignorant of the facts.

+Kev KFZ Ireland was neutral in WW2. So it is England, not "Great Britain". Correct enough ? Idiot.

+Mike Potter So if you know all the facts, then you know that Hitlers reason for invading Poland was to reclaim lost land & over a million citizens that were stolen from Germany in the Versailles Treaty right ? Let's do a hypothetical... If someone takes something from you without your permission, & then you take it back from them, does that make you the bad guy in this situation ? Educate yourself on Brest-Litovsk for a little more backstory... ignorant fuck face.

*Well said on his part.* It's sad our US NAVY went from inviting good professors like this man; to now teaching Marxist Critical Race Theory.

And that doesn't mean you should act like a masochistic 15yo boy with a harsh alcoholic dad and an inferiority complex. He is TOTALLY and ENTIRELY narrative. No facts at all.

@@tnndll4294 this man is also a liar like Marxist gender studies professors, state propaganda is state propaganda, every single lie is a lie, regardless of how you view the teller.

you forget that Poland invaded soviets in 1920 during their civil war

You forgot the 1919 invasion of the Red Army.Stopped right outside of Warsaw.

Try not murdering civilians and wont get invaded on lands that were stolen and given to you by subjugators.

oscar6418 Agreed pal. I'm American and conservative and WW2 was a travesty imo. Allied with Soviet Union and empire $ UK driven to stop s a starving Germany from reclaiming it's rights and instigating a cold war was awful. I deal with revisionist history and Jew Hollywood all the time. Esp with my kids history homework. txs for reply.

Hitler started the war through territorial conquest. Nobody sent him into Poland and other European countries. He caused the war. Nobody attacked him after suspending commitment to the treaty of Versailles. But when he began his territorial aggressions, he had crossed the red line. Remember UK and France had security guarantees to Poland. If Hitler was not stopped, his evil empire would have spilled over the entire world. It was only war that could stop him and indeed it stopped him.

WWI was started to create the Balfour Declaration… WWII was fought to create the terrorist state of israel. Both wars were planned in advance of WWI… and so was WWIII.

You are so full of sht... and the best part ia that you trying to sell that sht under this video... HAHA

There was no Soviet Union in 1918... Bolsheviks also declared that USSR is not a continuation of Russia and because of that they not gonna pay Russian debt! That lie literally contradicts everything but this was never an issue with Russians that to this day living in the biggest country in the world and claiming that in whole history of Russia they did not attacked anyone...

Yes. Putin has said that the greatest tradegy of 20th century was the collapse of the USSR. The whole power structure in Russia unchanged. No purge of the Intelligence Services of Russia after the "collapse" of USSR. It was a staged, managed restructuring. Same policy, same organizational goals. Unbroken.

It was first published in parts because YT got limits of video lenght in its begginings. And AH made so many mistakes i was always wondering how so many people are not able to see it and claiming that he was a good military leader somehow. For a retired corporal from the First World War, yes, but overall the number of critically wrong decisions in his bio is simply astonishing! A megalomaniac who spent billions on projects that did not help at all, the best example being the gigantic networks of tunnels in Poland on which he spent a lot of money, alienated everyone who hated the Bolsheviks -> including Japan(that is why they refused to join his attack on USSR)...

The Suvorov facts (what they did) are same as in common history. The difference is in that Suvorov assumes that Stalin and his generals were clever and thats why he was in power, while communist history assumes that they made immature and stupid decisions (what they thought). We know the facts but were the people in charge really that stupid is what Suvorov asked.

Then why didn't Hitler stick to the plan to occupy the oil region when it could have been taken? 🤔 Oh, that's right...Stalingrad was more important because it was named after Stalin...and Hitler was crazy...and and and had syphilis...that's it! 🙄 Fact of the matter is, Germany didn't need that oil in the first place. They simply didn't have a fully mechanized army that required the huge amounts of petroleum that the British Commonwealth or American forces did. Not as big of a navy, either. It was necessary to make sure it stayed in Soviet hands. In fact, the Germans never captured much in the way of strategic or economic importance in Russia.

@@valentinius62 "Fact of the matter is, Germany didn't need that oil " that explains why Germany won the war...😅 And yes, German tanks in 1939 and 1940 was burning mainly Soviet oil, were made with Soviet metals and German commenders were trained in Kama Tank school in USSR...

@@Bialy_1 Yes. A very odd relationship between Germany and the Soviet Union that most mainstream historians don't seem to bother much about. I'm convinced that they never actually stopped being allies. People confuse "ally" with "friend". They aren't the same thing. And it should be obvious with our knowledge now that supposed enemies actually may aid one another. Like CIA agent Frank Sturgis being with Fidel Castro's group in Cuba while they were trying to overthrow the Batista regime. As for Germany winning, they did. West Germany became an economic powerhouse after the war. And lots of people profited not just off the war, but also the rebuilding and the decades long "Cold War".

***** NO, ... It was me.... I was bored

The same as WW1 and WW2

It is the full lecture.

***** Just this past month I read that FDR used back channels to urge the government of Poland to not negotiate with Germany over the corridor to Danzig, giving assurances that the US would provide financial and military support to Poland if it came to an armed conflict. FDR's purpose was to start a conflagration in Europe. David Irving pointed out that FDR succeeded in busting up four empires: The British, German, Dutch and French.

***** n 1919-1920 the Polish ruling circles declared out to restore the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the borders of 1772 and the conquest of the corridor to the Black Sea (Poland from sea to sea). Poland seized Vilnius and Lithuania in the field in direct violation of the treaty between Lithuania and Poland in 1920 . March 17, 1938 Poland declared ultimatum to Lithuania to cancel the article of the constitution, declaring Vilnius the capital of Lithuania, and guarantee the rights of the Polish minority in Lithuania. In case of disagreement on the requirements within 24 hours Poland threatened to occupy Lithuania, which then was done so. Poland was the first State to conclude a nonaggression pact with Hitler's Germany. January 26, 1934 was signed the Polish-German non-aggression pact for 10 years. The Polish ambassador in Berlin, Jozef Lipski said on this occasion the French reporter, that "now Poland does not need in France anymore". "We are delighted with our first agreements with Hitler" - said the head of the Polish state Pilsudski to the French Foreign Minister Louis Bart in spring 1934. From 1934 to 1939, a strategic partnership with the Nazis was the core of the Polish foreign policy. In 1938 Poland, together with Hitler'r Germany attacked Czechoslovakia and shared it. Churchill called Poland vulture of Europe.

***** No, Britain and France did not attack Germany, they declared war. France advanced as far as its own Maginot Line and Britain sent troops in spring 1940. It was Germany and Russia that started WW2 by invading Poland, and Russia went on to attack Finland and send troops into the three Baltics prior to a full occupation.

romansUK That's wrong, England and France *did* start WWII when they declared war on Germany. The only reason England didn't attack first was because when she declared war on Germany she had not bloody army! Before England and France declared war on Germany it was a German Polish conflict, for you to understand that you will have to look at Germany prior to WWI and Germany after WWII, after WWI Germany got land stolen from her, land on which the Germans had lived since they days before the Roman Empire. England and France should have stayed out of it. Before Germany attacked Poland the Poles had persecuted and killed around 50 000 Germans in the land the Poles were occupying after WWI, they had also taken German civilian aircraft's heading for Koenigsberg under fire, three times. He had every right to attack Poland, heck, the Americans attacked Iraq after 911, and "only" 3000 Americans died, _and_ they attacked the WRONG country since the attackers came from Saudi Arabia, and lo and behold, the English signed up for that war too! And you blame the Germans for wanting to reclaim land that was *stolen* from them after WWI and for them to want to protect their people?! Sober up dude. And no, you don't get to use the "holocaust" as an excuse, by that time it was three years out.

+Max von Musterberg "...hundred thousands of Germans died by hunger" Yes the favored tactics of the allies. Starve em to death, photograph the emaciated bodies, and pass em off as victims of Germany

Me too ;]

Stalin was so excited that he wrote his name twice on the division of Poland between USSR and Nazi Germany. Stalin should have allowed the foreign minister, Molotov, sign first.

@@twoheadeddatascientist3289 or through signing the pact as a non official member of the state or only as the ",General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union" the USSR was not bound to the pact, only Germany.

@@GoetzimRegen Interesting

@@GoetzimRegen The point is that it was a trap, Germans were thining that they are setting it and Soviets were thinking the same... half of Europe ended up in Soviet hands so clearly Stalin plan was more realistic.

Expansionists in close proximity don't make the best of allies. It was fine for Germany to ally with distant Japan or a more muted junior partner like Italy.

Because communism and national socialism had very differing views on key subjects. They had some similarities for sure, but the Germans believed in a class system, private property, tradition and religion.

Hiler invited Stalin to be one of the Axis powers in 1940, but Molotov made such outrageous and insulting demands (such as he wanted to occupy all of Romania and the Baltic countries), which pissed off Hitler and made him rethink the M-R Pact.

Putin was played like a little boy... they feed him with 100% wrong intel via FSB and Ukraine was pretending that they did not prepared anything even after the invasion allready started. They want Russia to bleed out and they are failing for it again... they never learn.

It’s far too brainwashed and indoctrinated to unleash. It’s power and potential is in the hands of its treacherous ruling class. They don’t have the ambition or vision to create something for their own people. They’ll ruin everything.

It is a tribute, his real name is Vladimir Rezun

Germany signed anty comintern pact with Japan and the next move by them was to sign Ribbentrop-Molotov pact and split 50/50 Japan ally with COMINTERN and who Germany helped to destroy? Literally the only country that at that time did anything to stop Bolsheviks...

Evil Storm If you want to call me a dickhead, you will first need to quote something I said and then show evidence that something I said was untrue.

у тебя короткая память дружок, перед этим было торговое соглашение с нацистской Германией и Англией, занятие рейнской области, аншлюс Австрии, раздел Чехословакии, "странная война" с Францией, "чудо Дюнкерка ", не надо всё валить на Россию, мы брали только то что принадлежало Российской Империи и не более того.

kirov1010 nepizdi ubliudok

Since the Anglo-Soviet Agreement was signed in 41 just before the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union I'm not sure how the British helped start WW2.

@@markgrehan3726 they pushed and pushed for it. You need to seek out and listen to more churchill speeches and publications. France and Britain pushed for it and pushed poland for it danzig could have easily have been solved diplomatically.

FYI the US & Canada have the world's longest undefended border- that is something countries can be very proud of.

KentA Mitchell their goverments work for same people

KentA Mitchell The US is a scary war-mongering state, even Europeans hate the US.

> i have read “Averell Harriman ran the Soviet war effort because Stalin had a mental breakdown”… any truth to that? No.

They won't as they have to continue the narrative of the "great patriotic war" charade

I would say after seeing many speeches from hilter around this time. More and more makes sense from this video that I go back to to listen to.

Moscow Archives were already opened in 1991-1992, the Austrian historian Heinz Magenheimer printed a map in his book of the Soviet invasion of Europe plans created from the fall of 1940 to May 1941.

MEGAMIND!

What's the difference? They're both pronounced the same.

@Chidis Skaniukas Yes, finishing preparations by haveing completely disorganized army

@Chidis SkaniukasVery successfull preparations. all of the 10 mechanised cores are completely disorganized, dont have enough manpower, almost all of them have no artillery and cars, only 17 presents of cannons are anti tank and all of the other ones are useless against German tanks. Many tanks in mechanized cores are broken and are not able to fight. Mechanized cores are located somewhere who the hell knows where in the middle of the military districts. Aviation is being completely disorganized. Bombers are separated from fighter planes, most of the planes as same as tanks are old from the era of civil war in Spain. This is the reason why in the first day of war 70 presents of planes got destroyed. Complete disorganisation of rifle divisions. Most of the officers are cadets that know 0 about war because of Stalins repressions. Only 30 presents of the Soviet divisions are were at the border by the time of German invasion. The divisions were disorganized and the 1939 new border defence line wasn't prepared for the german invasion just because Soviets didn't care about it and were located somewhere behind it.

@Chidis Skaniukas In 1939 Soviet chief of headquarters Boris Shaposhnikov announced a plan of invasion of Germany as a counterplan against the German invasion. This plan got refused because it was useless and was to fail.

@Chidis Skaniukas I’m explaining why Soviets weren’t preparing anything. What are your proofs that they were

@Chidis Skaniukas If Soviets would attack first then Soviet mechanised cores would be destroyed in the first days of war without support of aviation that will be completely destroyed

Great Britain had no business sticking it’s nose in German polish border conflict!!!!!!!

@@garywenzlaff6918 There was no conflict at the border... Germans promosed 10 years of peace... they broke that promise like literally every single other promise they made! You remember how AH promised VW beatle cars for all the workers and did not deliver any cars to them because all were produced for the army? But why do you care so much? you butthurt that you lost 2 out of 2 World Wars and want to make it 3 out of 3? 2 may 1945 Polish soldier planted Polish flag at Berlin Victory column and AH was already cold... so stop defecding him as he do not needs your help anymore!

Without ad hominem, they would have NOTHING. Ad hominem is the basis of Trumpism, and every other right-wing extremism. And the most laughable thing is that they do not even understand what ad hominem is, and why it is antithetical to rational discussion.........

Military megamind vibes BOOM! Bro your conviction is pathetic, please watch the TIK video "why Hitler had to start WW2" and "The main reason the war was lost". I know I don't sound too soft and maybe too loud, but that's what it is. Thoughts are skewed, both yours and mines. Cheers and good night.

It was a pre-emptive strike. Soviets were going to invade Germany and had a massive military build up. Have you even listened to Suvorov?

@@cyberhermit1222 He is paid for the discreditation not for learning true history...

+Ray R Most of the people living in countries such as Lithuania, Poland or Czechoslovakia are aware of most of what he's saying but that's not the same in the West, where Soviets were potrayed as good allies for too long and where everybody demonizes Hitler but not many people remember what Stalin did. That's why it's important for a Russian to go to America and tell the stupid Yankees how nice it actually was to live in the Soviet Union. Especially when in the US there are still plenty of leftist college professors who are butthurt about the fall of the USSR.

Utterly false. The public in the entire West and also in Russia today is NOT taught the Suvorov theory, but instead that Hitler was a maniac who invaded Russia because he was on a roll of conquering countries and had never heard of Napoleon and how that ended up.

Should have ukraine surredered donbass?

@@alessioproietticp : No but they should have recognised the legitimate Russian interests there. When you have two groups of people with loyalties to two different nations it is always a recipe for disaster. There are examples off political solutions in places around the world. The Andorra solution between France and Spain, the power sharing executive in Northern Ireland are two, there are many other variations. Simply refusing to discuss these issues is also a recipe for disaster.

Actually Britain didn't guarantee Polish borders, they guaranteed a defense of the Polish state. If Poland had chosen to give away Danzig in the spring or summer of 1939, there wasn't anything Britain could do about it. But since the Poles knew the Brits were now behind them, they felt no motive to compromise with the Germans.

Guaranteeing the borders or the State makes little difference to the fact that had Britain not done either Poland would have been more inclined to negotiate with the Nazis. Strangely Poland would have made a very good ally in their fight against the Soviets. The problem Poland faced was that they were sandwiched between two much larger countries. When Poland was recreated both Germany and Russia were week at the same time, by 1936 both were strong again and at each others throats. Poland only had two realistic options, side with one or other of the two, or follow a neutral path. Following a neutral path is only possible if you have no outstanding issues the countries surrounding you, Poland did, and did nothing about it. We know the result of that, the two big countries partitioned Poland between them.

What passes for history in your home is comic books. Grow up son.

Poland recaptured the territory that had belonged to her before 1920. It was an ethnic Polish territory (Zaolzie) and it was invaded and annected by Czechoslovakia after a treacherous attack in which hundreds of Polish patriots were murdered just when Poland was invaded by Bolshevik Russia. In 1938 the local Czechs were lucky and grateful that they were annected by Poland before Germans did. What you said is an example of anti-Polish communist propaganda spread after ww2.

@@christumferens1716 Nope that would justify Germanys invasion of Poland becouse Danzig is German

@@christumferens1716 According to the Versailles Treaty, you don't have some automatic right to take back old lands. Get a clue.

*****, did you forget what the 'A' stands for? It's the United States of _America_. The American continent stretches from Nunavut down to Patagonia, sure. But if your argument is that everyone from Canada to Chile is technically an American... well, good luck explaining that to the U.S. Border Patrol.

Hey Vulcan, one of the problem is when in a movie people say "I wanna go to America, land of opportunities...". When I was a little boy I thought that they were talking about the continent, but they actually referenced United States (shorter enough to be pronounced). It is also weird for a non-US (again shorter enough) citizen, listening the "on shift" president of US, saying things like "America will send troops to attack some mid-orient country", when we know it is only a decision of one country, USA. It is rude, it is a deal.

Edu Tutoriales It's not rude, nor should it be an issue. People having been calling the country "America" since its inception. It's so common that the only word there's ever been for a person born in the U.S. is "American." Furthermore, nobody in the U.S. refers to North and South America collectively as "America." We prefer to say "the Americas."

Mr. Vulcan. It's preferable to be an ignorant child than a rude and arrogant bully-boy. It was never my purpose to let you down this way. Sorry my friend, be called american if you are happy with it. "Si somos americanos, somos hermanos señores" immortal old American song.

"America is the continent, USA is the short for United States." That's simply not how the word America is used in the U.S. or most of the world.