Yup true

They all come from Kazakhstan. Kipchak Kings

@@nurithegolden5755 The founders and majority of the armies of both Mamluk Sultanates, yes

​@@nurithegolden5755Qalawun, the Aibaks, Iltutmish, and most importantly Baybars are some of the most notorious of the Mamluk-Kipchak Sultans

​@@nurithegolden5755but indian mamluks came from karalok turks modern day uzbekistan

be quiet, gaymer

Total War? Crusader Kings? Civ?

@@miniondaechir that's only 3 series, and total war only has India in one game. And they only feature India. You don't really get to experience the history or culture.

Eu4

​@@emanuelpetre5491be quiet, gaymer (affectionate)

It's not rich it's dark period od indian history

@@navinsingh5564 Indians hate it solely because it was a muslim kingdom and not a hindu, otherwise they would have loved it.

Thank you, glad you liked my drawing :)

Yeah, she looked like a sweet one.

You got good taste! Manu Pillai's books are also pretty good.

Lmao Aniruddh Kanisetti is more like a hogwashed pseudo historian who is more like an internet theorist than an actual professional.

Anirudd Kanisetti is not a very neutral historian. He has a narrative that he wants to display and has huge biases and cherry picks centre pieces of history whilst leaving other bits out all to simply fulfil his narrative.

If you want to learn about a more neutral historian but offers multiple perspectives, search Jay Vardhan Singh

That’s not Indian history but Turkic

Thanks man! I appreciate that :D

​@@EpimetheusHistorycan you make a video about the Taino people of the Caribbean before colonization.

@@EpimetheusHistory We need more people like you spreading good knowledge

I also heard that the Mullah Do Pyaza is the best there 😂

@@stormshadow5283 yes the dish as well as rhe person is famous here😂😂

​​@@yameenulhaq280 But now the muslims have been cornered in old Delhi which now is called central Delhi in which they are only 30% of the population in central Delhi And there are close to no muslims in other districts of Delhi and new delhi (close to 5%) 🥲 Delhi has now become a Hindu and Sikh city 🥲😭

@@DhruvSharma5972 100 percent right.. Actually many Muslims migrated to Pakistan after partition and Muslims remain a minoriry in delhi around 13 percent and mainly concentrated in old delhi chandani chowk... But muslim influence is widely felt across delhi be it in food or monuments

all those are formed after destroying Indian monuments and temples and ur mughal buildings are formed using remnants of hindu temples and architecture. Learn history for real without living in lies

Chadjapati Empire....destroyer of the Mlecchas ❤

That's colonialism based Euro-Centricity for you.

​@@FDSixtyNinenobody is keeping anybody from talking about non european history.

​@@konradvonschnitzeldorf6506Who said anyone is keeping people from it?

@@GrigRP I am just tired of people complaining about europeans talking about european history lmao. It even happened in University, if you wanna study non-european history maybe expect it from non-europeans.

many contemporary historians are more aware than you give them credit for. It also depends on where the historian is from and is capable of.

Ghurrid also. imagine invading india with an elongated border gore just to die without an heir

@@YapsiePresents Bro, I just got the Ghurrid achievement in CK3 and I was so confused why I got a notification about the Ghurrids from youtube

She was also a bloodthirsty slaughterer of the indigenous Hindu people

She was.. Even to this day there are many folk tales and poems dedicated to her.

Razi was an awful ruler. Sure, she's a strong women and managed to fight her way to the top in a world dominated by misogynistic men at the time, but her rule was awful with her religious persecution. She destroyed the Kashi Vishveshwar Temple in Varanasi and built the Razia Mosque on top of it. This temple was as important for Hindus as Mecca Masjid is for Muslims or Vatican or St Paul's is for Christians

@@dwarasamudra8889 number one, wow I didn't know about the Kashi Temple being pillaged by Razia, will look into that. Thanks. Lastly, Vatican is not important for Christians. It's only for Roman Catholics. Orthodox Christians (who make 20% of Christians) and Protestants (who make 40% of Christians) have nothing to do with Vatican. But yeah, if you want to relate on the importance on a Holy Place for Christians, then it has to be "the Church of Holy Sepulchure" or even "the Church of Nativity" which are significant for almost all Christians in the world irrespective of their denominations. The Crusades started only when the Fatimid Caliph Billah burned the Church of Holy Sepulchure that led to the Christian-Muslim fights in The Holy Land. I am very distraught with hearing that even Kashi Temple was pillaged. I never knew about that. Is there any fund or organisation that I can donate to rebuild it? I'll do my contribution. Thanks.

@@ritikshaw5868 folk tales like what? Your masturbation fantasies are not folk tales lmao

Just like Nepali idiots think there history start from Gorkha unification while ignoring how they were under Indian kingdoms for atleast 4000 years. Now go & cry me a river.😂😂

​well he is right , most of indians like you do get triggered nowdays@@PahadiSher

@sahilsingh6048 It triggered you more when I spoke the truth that nepal was just a region for Indian & Chinese empires, so poornthat they didn't even bother conquering it.😂

You're no different

Yup Mughal were vassal of Maratha & only limited to Delhi in 1710s

@@AsifAli-od1cf technically they were appointed to rule by the badshah. Like how the chhatrapati appoints the peshwa.

lol who told u that mughals were always the official ruler of INDIA up until 1857 they may have lost the military might after nadir shahs invasion in 1739 and eventually had signed a protection pact with the marathas in 1752 .Before 1752 the Mughals were on their very own .The marathas remained a confederacy coz they were very well aware of the fact that they lack governing skills so they never took up the role of ruler of Indian sub continent rather used their armies as mercenaries to collect chauth tax on behalf of the protection the marathas directly ruled significant part of maharashtra ,not even marathwada ( since it was always under the mughal nizams until taken away by the britishers ) Gujarat and madhya pradesh.

​@@MohsinRaza-uq2owgiving facts right from Quran lol Mughal lost control and they didn't ruled india after 1752 Go and search about mughal maratha war

​@@user-uj2tk2tv3zabe ling pujari stop getting facts from gita. Peshwas professed loyalty to the mughals. Check the history books

Bhutto or Zia?

did they teach you that at WhatsApp universities?

The Hindu persecution complex must be studied

@@Bundpatakanot complex, there was actual Hindu persecution and genocide - to deny it is akin to denying the holocaust, mistreatment of African slaves, the Japanese atrocities during WW2 etc.

​@@Bundpatakahindu persecution did indeed happen but not on the level as the guy above is saying

@@rishavkumar1250 I’m not as well versed in the history of the Delhi Sultanate specifically, but I can imagine a lot of what the commenter above said probably did occur just going of how many other Islamic rulers behaved and what their ideology taught

It was insignificant, India itself was insignificant until muslims came and made it into a major imperial power.

Nizam was the biggest traitor To Mughal in 1857 & To Maratha First state to join subsidiary alliance of British

It was such a tragic time for India. Wish they never invaded 😓

​@@dwarasamudra8889there was nothing tragic about it Far better than radical hindus who were fighting with each other lol

​@@user-uj2tk2tv3zwhat do you mean by radical hindus?? There was no hindutva nonsense back then. It's just like how Christian states fought against each other in Europe. Even Muslim states fought among themselves if they had a good excuse like if the opponent was shia or other sect of islam.