LMAOOOO

Lol nice joke bro

LLOOOOOLLLLLLLLLL

goofy ahh

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

KZfaq is broken -linux user

@@_Vark_ ive seen a lot of car youtubers say it just fine and not be in any trouble, i assume if you're just saying it willy nilly they'll flag ya, but in context you should be fine

"coque" is french for "case" or "shell", so it just makes banning people who said monocoque without context much stupider, as it does not contain any vulgarity between the 2 initial words :/

@@DaciaSandero_1.5DCi can be taken as "cock"

It's more of a an auto filter concern than them getting blazed over it in normal context.

I've seen that. It was very neat to watch.

Even after understanding how crumple zones work, a part of me feels like crashing an old car would have me crushed against the body because of its rigidity and crashing a new car would mean the crumple zones would be crushed and the whole thing folds in on me,crushing me.

@@lapiswolf2780 well, you would get a nasty concussion (or worse) from smacking into the steering wheel, even on the rare airbag equipped vintage car, the effect is not great

"tHeY dOnT mAkE tHeM LiKe tHey UsEd tO"

You again...

The front section is much smaller and without the engine in it, it's also much lighter. So it doesn't have the same amount of surface area to be knocked off and doesn't have enough inertia to unbolt itself either. That coupled with the fact that most impacts that actually hit the front have at least some of the forces coming from in front due to the motion of the car, it ends up crushing the front and the only way it'll come off is to be ripped off.

Yeah, I did 8x slow mo when recording and had the no compression mode on for the replay, was kind of confused myself when I saw it was shaking, perhaps for the speed of the crash I should have gone with 16x or 32x slow motion instead.

@@BioBoyo Hmm, that's odd. I never knew about the no compression mode. I hope the replays tool will be more polished in the next update.

Pedestrian safety is the sole reason for why new cars get the reputation for being “weaker”. Their panels are weaker on a surface level because the exact same boomers who complain keep running over people.

There is something to be appreciated in older vehicles with their ruggedness and simplicity when you do *all* the work your car will ever need by yourself. I think most people that say something like that are thinking in terms of working on the car and having it survive trivial things, like a 10mph bump, as opposed to thinking their 67 Camaro will protect them at all in a 70mph collision. I don't think most people have faith in *any* car from *any* era at those speeds, even though many new cars are life saving for all but the most extreme crashes.

​@@ProbablyNotAChickenThere are definitely good and bad aspects to both new and old cars. Neither may be superior, but both have qualities we would want in an ideal car

they dont make cars like they used to

well yes, he showed examples of real life splits..

ejecto seato cuz

same here

This allows the companies to make much more money, as there is basically NO chance of repairing the thing. How convenient! lol I don't buy into this.

Check out my far lands video!

me too 😭

hahahahha, kidding aside great explanation though. Wild even Beamng can demonstrate that @@BioBoyo

Hey now

@@BioBoyoYou’re an all-star

fr💀

That was a Mclaren :/

@@zoonibutt9334 ha

Not a supercar

@@satsumagt5284 sports car same thing

@@FregthyfroggoIt doesn't have a carbon fibre monocoque, but rather, a steel unibody. It's a sports version of the A6 Avant, and nothing else.

@@satsumagt5284 e

@doggothehedgehog maybe

that what i was thinking as the entire point of the car industry is profit and will only care about your safety if they know you can buy another one.

even if it didn't split in 2 it would be a total loss anyway.