But but. You were able to understand the verses. Therefore, the book must be clear, Dr. D. Wood. Jk

thanks youtube for a muslim ad before this at 1x

David, do you have like a pdf material or word with all the references against Muhamed and quran so i can take, translate into my own language and show to my community? Bless you

Hamas, Al Queda, ISIS, Hazbulla, and so on have all 1 thing in common; Islam. I don't want to sound crazy but have you guys ever red the quran? There are passages in there where Mohammed calls for the killing of all Jews and that "the last hour" would not come until Muslims slaughter the Jews (Sahih Muslim 2922). And there's passages in there saying Muslims should not take Christians and Jews as friends because they are friends of eachother and Mohammed called Christians and Jews "unjust people" (Surah Al-Ma'idah - 51). I am afraid these groups will not disappear until Islam disappears and people realize it's not a religion of peace but of war and terror, not all Muslims are bad people; some are Muslim by customs of the country they live in and family they have but never really read the quran and just try to live a good life. The reason why Mohammed has this hatred against the Jews and Christians is because when Mohammed went to the Jews to prove to his followers he was a prophet (he said the Jews would confirm he was a prophet), the Jews send him packing and told him in his face he was wrong and not a prophet (and the Jews were right); that is where his hatred for Jews started. And likewise the Christians rejected Mohammed as a prophet, which caused his hatred for Christians. Islamists treat Mohammed like more than a prophet, they treat him like Messiah; Mohammed is a false prophet and false messiah leading many astray into hatred for one another even to the point of death. All Israel is doing right now is self-defense, the land called Israel was never called Palestine and there was no Palestinian identity until the Muslims and Arabs made it up in the mid-late 1900's; it's a Islamic lie, because in Islam they are allowed to lie in war times; there has been war on and off since Israel's reestablishment and the aggressors are Islamic countries and Islamic terrorist groups funded by Islamic countries. The land Israel; to who'm does it belong in the first place? The Arabians Muslims, falsely identifying as Palestinians, argue it belongs to them but let's take a look at history and facts: Before 1200 BC the land belonged to the Sea Peoples In and after 1200 BC it belonged to Israelites In 957 BC the Israelites build the first Temple In 722 BC the Assyrians invade Israel and take over In 586 BC the Babylonians invade the land and take over and causes the displacement of Israel In 515 BC Israelites return to Israel and the second Temple is build In 332 BC Alexander the great invades Israel and takes over In 63 BC the Romans came and took over Israel but Israel was still considered a vassal State at that time - 0 BC passing by the birth, life, death, resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ of Nazareth we go into AD - In 70 AD the temple is destroyed In 136 AD the Romans (ruled by Emperor Hadrian) named the area of modern Israel "Paleshtina" as an insult to the Jews after the Bar Kokhba revolt (because the Philistines were the enemy of ancient Israel). In 343 AD the Christians take over the Roman empire, this was not a violent take over; it was by conversion In 395 AD the Romans split In 636 AD the Muslims invade, forcibly converting the Christians and Jews to Islam or killing them or enslaving them or running them off by force In 1099 AD the Christians recapture Jerusalem and the surrounding areas, establishing the Crusader States In 1291 AD the Mamluk Muslims invaded and took over the area, forcefully converting the Christians and Jews back to Islam In 1517 AD the Ottoman empire invaded and conquered the region In 1918 AD after World War I the Christians took back over the region, this was taken by England In 1948 AD England "gives" the land back to the Jews and Israel is reestablished. In 1948 AD it was not "given back" to the Jews exactly; there was a war following the 1947 UN partition plan, later, in 1948, following the declaration of the establishment of the State of Israel on May 14, 1948, Arabs launched a military intervention in what became the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, resulting in Israel gaining control of more land than allocated in the UN plan. In present time, Israel owns the land and gave the Arabs who identify as "Palestinians" a piece of land called Gaza, in return Hamas (ruler of Gaza) sends Islamic terrorists to kill innocent civilians in Israel on October the 7th (just to name one example of the many examples) and declares Jihad; they want to take over Israel by force through murder, terrorism and destruction. So who has the right to the land? Israel. But let's give more facts and details: - If we look into the Bible and the Torah it is clear it belongs to Israel (the Jews). - Jews owned the land for 1411 years, the Muslims for 1090 years and the Christians for 515 years; so by years it belongs to the Jews. - If the land belongs to the Natives of the land; the Natives of the land are Jews so it belongs to the Jews - The "Philistines" are the ancient enemy of the Jewish people (which are not the Arabs that call themselves "Palestinians" today, and those people (the Philistines) are long gone from the world today) - The Roman empire called the land "Paleshtina" as an insult as mentioned above and not "Palestine" actually, "Palestine" is just a misinterpreted of the word "Paleshtina" - The matter of the fact is that "Palestine" and the "Palestinian people" are not more than a fiction, a fake, a propaganda made by the Arabs and Muslim world - Israelis have no other country to go to, and this is the decisive truth that helped Israel win all its wars. Israelis have nowhere to go, therefore every war and every conflict is an existential threat to Israel. Muslims have about 50 countries, to live, go to, etc. Facts, history and common sense says Israel belongs to the Jews and Islam is a threat to every human life; the Jew, the Christian and even the unbeliever.

Jes❤us power proof. Warning it last 72 hours

This is what centuries of inbreeding and punishing believers for _thinking_ does to people.

​@jazzymilesmiles3308 Definitely not Arabic.

​@jazzymilesmiles3308 Also, taste my shahada: *Muhammad is in Hell, eternally drowning in an ocean of boiling pig shit.*

@jazzymilesmiles3308well Aramaic. But that’s not the point: the point is that God is above all things. How anyone can think that if you don’t speak one language out of literally thousands that He wouldn’t talk to you is frankly absurd.

@jazzymilesmiles3308Aramaic,it’s on his birth certificate remember,when they completed the census form!55555

admittedly, I gave up years ago. I have now read it - the more I read, the more horrific it appears to be. I have started to delve in to the Sunnah, and honestly it is so disturbing. I just pray to the Lord that all the muslims who have been deceived by the false prophet find the real lord Jesus and his love, and realise that God wants us as his CHILDREN and not purely a slave as Muhammad says. I totally agree everyone should read the Qur'an - it is the most bizarre book ive ever seen.... and shows Islam for what it is - absolutely inspired by Satan! x

@@MicheMoffattand you’re probably more well read than ~80% of professed Muslims already!

it's so bad.

@@AD-cc7bjnot even trying to be mean

I as a Catholic read the first chapter and a bit of chapter 2 of the quran and I got so bored I got rid of the tab on my phone

Along with having multiple witnesses writing about him and all stories aligning in continuity. All we can take away from Mohammed is he was a perverted Schizo that sold a hoax to Billions of People.

Wasn’t married , no multiple wives , no consummation marriage to kids. Just Jesus Christ The Son of the Living God

Bro told us to love our enemies. Who tf does that. Bro was something else

@@oevandrorealconfia4762 bruh my exact thoughts happy fathers btw if not to you then to yours for sure brother

there are not just abrahmic religions , we also have eastern dharmic religions , maybe you wanna have a look ? Like Hinduism,Buddhism,Jainism,Sikhism,shintoism etc , stop this desert abrahmic crap, Jesus was no god and a mere human, apart from it ,it is quite evident he meditated his years in India ​@@oevandrorealconfia4762

Exactly, word salad.....

Such a correct explenation, i read once, full in my own language and it was struggling, i wonder how do they can get mind from there who are not speaker of arabic, jumping from one subject to other in next verse, obviously he Heard from someone to someone information and couldn't share

I did the same.. And i closed the book and left it.. 6 years later i tried it again.. This time i found a better translation.. And then i re-verted to Islam.. So maybe you just need to try a better translation.

“Because it’s not Aaaarraaabiiiiic”

You know arabic

Remain an ignorant Christian who believes God can be killed by his creation…and be born from a woman. Good luck with miserable life here and beautiful hell in the hereafter

It was revealed in Arabic because the Illusory Truth Effect is easily implemented. 🤔 It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. Just know that the truth has little defense against a fool determined to believe a lie. 😁

​@@ranro7371 no, the text is taken from the Jewish psalms, the book of wisdom of Solomon and a lot of phrases from aramaic heritage. 🎉🎉🎉

Reading the Quran in English is totally different translations to Arabic.

​@@alphabeta86 Still same old Jewish and Aramaic content...

@@redouan-nx5le lol imagine using hadiths to explain quran . they say allah gave them one book ,one truth 😁

@@groundzero5708 Allah gave then a clear book... but needs an imperfect book like Hadith and Tafseer to explain it. LMAOOO

Its very normal and logic, there are so many illogical and obscure suras that if you dont question the whole madness you may be viewed as unconsciousness.

​​@@redouan-nx5lefirst of all it is a crappy language second of all even if it wasn't a crappy language the Quran doesn't make sense had you actually read it you would know.

​@@redouan-nx5leno translations are not interpretations in the Bible does make sense to anyone who has actually read it with an open mind. And of course I can tell that you have not read the Quran or the Holy Bible.

I had seen Nabeel's book at a Christian Life Book Store (in north Texas), and bought it; enjoyed it immensely too. Praise be to our Father for leading Nabeel to His Son Jesus!!!

You should read the sumerian tablets and see where christianity was copied from.

@@_Highvalue_ you read cuneiform?

It’s pretty interesting how he died from stomach cancer after his conversion when the punishment in Islam for backbiting is painful death and permanent hell

​@@Expiredbeefsteak is that why your false prophet died a slow and painful death from the hands of a Jewish lady, allah couldn't protect your false prophet from poison. what a powerless god.

Allahu akbar😅😅😅

This is a liar telling his lie.

@@hussinmahmood3222 go and read and understand first...i also a muslim

and when you read the bible, you will realise that churches and mosques are insane asylums

Just like the Bible.

@@FDJUwe On the contrary, AbdūI.

No no no man you not paaaay enough jiziyah, they proteeeeect you or in this case negleeeeect you smh they're doing the dawah dash out here we've all seen the commercial don't miss out on this special opportunity to get scammed by the Quran and Islam for a unlimited time only special price for you 🎉

Not that impressive as a god then if he only knows 1 language 😂

If you watch Apostate Prophet's video "Reading The Quran Turns Muslims Away", you will see that the imams are afraid of the Quran and the hadiths being translated into local languages, since the believers will be able to read the holy texts on their own and start to question the teachings of the imams. This will give rise to a sizable number of them leaving the religion and the imams losing their power over them. This also happened in Europe in the past. vis a vis Christianity

@@gracereciever You said that Allah isn’t that impressive because he knows just one language. 😂 Very true since Al-low is MoeHamHead’s sock puppet. Think of Moe as a spiritual ventriloquist. 💀

​@@JhutaNabi😂

Wow sounds interesting, do you have any sources on this that I could dig deeper into?

Right! The verse that says killing one innocent person is like Killing all people every Muslim brings up whenever a terr0r!st attack happens, is taken verbatim from the Talmud.

The Quran is taken from a whole bunch of religions, well, only what Muhammed knew about these religions, That's obvious from when Allah asks Jesus in the Quran if He "told people to make a God out of Him and His mother" its obvious that Muhammad didn't know that Muhammad didn't know that Christians never worshiped mary, they honor her, One other thing, is that at a certain point, Arabic language almost got lost to Turkish during the othmani "Turkish" invasion over Arabic regions. The only thing that kept the language from vanishing was priests hiding scrolls and books in churches, that's why every single Quran you find today is from after 1925(after the end of the othmani invasion)

@@thelegend1561 He also seemed to think that the Gospel and Torah at the time confirmed the his made up Quran lol

That heavily depends on the dialect you’re referring to. Moroccan Arabic (Darija) surprisingly has many vocabularies from French and Spanish. Talking about Classical Arabic your comment might be accurate.

@@redouan-nx5le Classical Arabic nope

​@@redouan-nx5lethat doesn't change the fact that classical arabic is garbage. The Quran is nonsense and when you bring this up they always say, "but you should read it in arabic" yet the Quran says it's clear and also that some verses no ody understand but "allah". It's clearly man-made and a cult

muslims : imagine a prophet called George. He demands you follow his pedoness and kill. he fullfills no prophecies, makes none, says he has no idea what will happen to him or others after death. would you follow him commiting sins like murder, theft, lying and rape? no if his name is george, but yes if mohammad.

​@@redouan-nx5leyou're really showing off your massive vocabulary. loan loan loan loan.

The most accurate description

😂❤

Reading the Necronomicon inflicts less sanity damage than _trying_ to read the Quran. The associated gods (e.g. Cthulhu, Yog-Sothoth, Nyarlathotep, etc.) are less evil, too.

Were you dreaming.. 😅😂 Tell your audience why you are all the time deleting the replies of an academic @ranro7371.. You're just pushing a false impression on the Q.. I doubt if you are a 'doctor'... 😆🤣😋

​@@ranro7371looking up the Aramaic word for God in the book of Daniel, I found it is Elohai not alaha as you claim. You should know that allah is a female word, best translated as goddess and not god.

Writing a religion is wild, that makes it prone to mistranslation, misinterpretation, ambiguity, and corruption, as both the Quran and Bible suffer from.

I almost became Muslim because of people who lied about the Quran and sugar coated it to make it look more preety, but Jesus saved me from joining that cult

Fact

😂

i thought christian been spreading with lies..thats why most of them leave the church

That's 'Taqiyya' for you !

How many of them stick around after reading the translations? And how many of _them_ communicate by nervous winking?

😮😅😂

@@Earthangeljoela I think anastasia means that most people don't understand the Quran until they read the commentary.

@@EarthangeljoelaThe Bible’s original language isn’t even English. Also, the Bible in all of its translations is pretty clear and eloquent.

​@@Earthangeljoelasir, get back on your meds

I wonder though. I doubt Christian translators feel the same dread over it, when they can leave a footnote and explain that they don't know what it means... I think the trouble with the quran is that they have to perpetuate the lie that it has been preserved perfectly.

@@Earthangeljoela don't encourage this copypasta fanatic

That's because it's bollocks

​@@josephbrandenburg4373footnotes in bibles on translation dont say that its unclear they give synonyms in most cases

Right? I'm an Orthodox Christian and what he says about Islam is true as does my fellow churchman Robert Spencer.

Me too @@Katholikos78

Christianity and Islam are same icecream different flavors. My book is perfect; no my book is perfect. You go to hell if you don’t believe in my god; no infact you go to hell if you don’t believe in my god as well the blood sacrifice. Both demoting the concept of God to petty childish person who is very pro their club and very anti other club to the point that anyone not rooting for their club will be made to suffer for eternity. Absurd and funny people but fun to watch.

No homo?

Why coz he paddles lies and tells u what u wanna hear

honestly I have heard this from scholars. It makes so much more sense than the traditional history of the Quran.

It's the same thing they say every time when losing an argument on the internet. Don't forget, the Quran says about itself that the very Quran is 100% perfect and 100% clear, and then you have stuff like this. What a prideful deception.

You should read the Quran with them... then ask them what does this mean? Read the dodgy verses they do not want to read. XD

@@neochris2 islam is the biggest brain washing of all history

It's weird because I read a comment on the godlogic video saying the sheikh something who debated didn't understand Arabic so he couldn't possibly understand Islam and someone got angry and replied that someone didn't need to understand Arabic to learn Islam. So which is the truth? Should or shouldn't people understand Arabic to learn Islam? 😂 What inconsistent group of people they are

@@Ario26 inconsistent is the perfect word to describe muslims and islam

or no toilet paper

Or feeding it to goats and birds, wait, but that actually happened 😂

🤣🤣🤣🤣

or for starting furnace :))))

​@@user-jf5qw6vg3h You're only "kidding" right??

If what they say is true then why is it that when Muhammad is preaching his Quran nobody is amazed by the eloquence of Allah but everyone think he’s a madman, who makes stuff up and is copying from old fables😂

I feel your pain of all the years you spent trying to make sense out of the CLEAR QURAN. Be happy that for some time now and forever, you have removed yourself from the cognitive dissonance and Quranic psycho-babel.

It's never a waste to study a new language! But I would pick Polish or Russian. 😀

You first mistake was dating a Muslim

@@josephbrandenburg4373 That's true, if done for the right reasons. I moved to France and learned the language. Unfortunately, the only guys who ever talk to me here are the Muhammadan variety.

Hahahahahahahahahah sooo true...its distracting and disturbing 😫😫😫😫😫

😂so true😅

The child is also their cousin.

Epic! 🤭

But that is not found in the Qur'an, at least that part about breast-feeding unrelated adult males in your household. Well, at lest not the Qur'an of today. Those verses, according to Isha, were eaten by a tame sheep that entered her dwelling. So, how come the Qur'an is the preserved word of Allah, a copy of the one in heaven on gold tablets? If the Qur'an was based on oral traditions, that sheep eating those breast-feeding verses would not make a difference; somebody would remember to insert them in the written version of the Qur'an. But they are missing in the modern Qur'an.

Skill issue. Since you’re here writing in English with an English based username, I’m pretty confident in betting you’re a native English speaker, or the very least a European speaker. Arabic is a very different language because it’s Semetic language. So learning it requires a complete rebuild of how you approach and relate with language. US state department puts it in the very hard category, and they’d know a thing or 80 about teaching people languages. I’m a native English speaker and it took me about six years to actually get good at Russian, and that’s another European language, which works about 80% the same. You’re an adequacy it’s not a problem on God’s part it’s your issue.

And I guess War and Peace is better in Ukranian or Russian than it is in other languages (sinceit was written in Russian). I've been learning Polish, maybe I should give Ukranian a try? 🙂

😂😂

With all respect to the Ukrainian Muslims. You better deal with the invaders of your country over than making an absurd statement like this.

The stories do not a beginning nor an ending

I watch Christian Prince and I love how he discusses the Bible and Quran and makes it easy to understand

Almost 60% to 70% of it is just fluff about how great their god is. Just cut to the chase already, haha

@@euengelion- it’s nothing but a book full of a sock 🧦 puppet’s insecurities.

I can only read English.. I have read portions of the Quran and it jumps all over the place. No context given. I found it highly underwhelming

You are lier, just because you became apostate you said that

@@ranro7371 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 There are already three languages waaaayyy older than Arabic off just the top of my history lessons. So… your very 1st premise is crumbling like a flimsy house of cards!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Same here. Know a bit of Arabic in both colonial influenced Arabic and Classical Arabic. Have no problem to search for Arabic dictionary while reading the Quran, the topics changed drastically like from “mountains are peg-leg like to prevent earthquakes” to “birds was made by Lah to divebomb demons” to “flying donkeys”. And I understand why many ex-muslims saying about the fear tactic in Quran for as you said every 3-5 sentences, there are promises to heaven and hell.

In every other verse it ends with a combination of these, "Allah is all wise, all knowing, all merciful". 😂😂 . It seem like Allah is a very prideful, narcissistic god 😂, sounds like Satan to me 🤔

Which is the last thing any god (theos or hotheos) with pretentions of wisdom or justice would have.

​​​​@@JKRuc That actually follows the logic of Near Eastern pagan prayers, which were less talking to their gods than _magical incantations designed to manipulate the target God or demon into doing what the petitioner wanted._ In practice, this usually meant alleviating a perceived curse, because gods and demons were thought to be prone to violent mood swings and arbitrarily getting offended over potentially anything a mortal did. Whether it was trying to increase one's fortunes or appeasement to alleviate a curse, one of the key components was *flattery,* usually by invoking particular names or titles to a god/demon relevant to the desired outcome. The flattery didn't even necessarily have to mean anything either, as it was fundamentally sympathetic magic designed to butter up/prime the entity in question. Knowing the kinds of Baalite traditions that actually gave rise to Islam's Allah, all the claims of Allah's "mercy" at the ends of Islamic prayers sound not only disingenuous, *but take on the tone of **_tacit begging of a tyrant to spare them._* Which, sadly, fits Allah's M.O. to a T. Edit: Also worth noting, this is why Yahweh instructed the Israelites _not to worship him with empty flattery and cajoling like the pagans did their gods._ Likewise, this is what is alluded to when Yahweh said you will not take His name in vain, as well as forbidding most forms of magic; both entail trying to *_manipulate God by magical means,_* and He most definitely won't tolerate that like some petty false god might.

@@JKRuc i know Muslims prayer in Arabic. “There’s no God but Allah. Allah is Almighty and Merciful. Allah knows best”

Show him this: Hamas, Al Queda, ISIS, Hazbulla, and so on have all 1 thing in common; Islam. I don't want to sound crazy but have you guys ever red the quran? There are passages in there where Mohammed calls for the killing of all Jews and that "the last hour" would not come until Muslims slaughter the Jews (Sahih Muslim 2922). And there's passages in there saying Muslims should not take Christians and Jews as friends because they are friends of eachother and Mohammed called Christians and Jews "unjust people" (Surah Al-Ma'idah - 51). I am afraid these groups will not disappear until Islam disappears and people realize it's not a religion of peace but of war and terror, not all Muslims are bad people; some are Muslim by customs of the country they live in and family they have but never really read the quran and just try to live a good life. The reason why Mohammed has this hatred against the Jews and Christians is because when Mohammed went to the Jews to prove to his followers he was a prophet (he said the Jews would confirm he was a prophet), the Jews send him packing and told him in his face he was wrong and not a prophet (and the Jews were right); that is where his hatred for Jews started. And likewise the Christians rejected Mohammed as a prophet, which caused his hatred for Christians. Islamists treat Mohammed like more than a prophet, they treat him like Messiah; Mohammed is a false prophet and false messiah leading many astray into hatred for one another even to the point of death. All Israel is doing right now is self-defense, the land called Israel was never called Palestine and there was no Palestinian identity until the Muslims and Arabs made it up in the mid-late 1900's; it's a Islamic lie, because in Islam they are allowed to lie in war times; there has been war on and off since Israel's reestablishment and the aggressors are Islamic countries and Islamic terrorist groups funded by Islamic countries. The land Israel; to who'm does it belong in the first place? The Arabians Muslims, falsely identifying as Palestinians, argue it belongs to them but let's take a look at history and facts: Before 1200 BC the land belonged to the Sea Peoples In and after 1200 BC it belonged to Israelites In 957 BC the Israelites build the first Temple In 722 BC the Assyrians invade Israel and take over In 586 BC the Babylonians invade the land and take over and causes the displacement of Israel In 515 BC Israelites return to Israel and the second Temple is build In 332 BC Alexander the great invades Israel and takes over In 63 BC the Romans came and took over Israel but Israel was still considered a vassal State at that time - 0 BC passing by the birth, life, death, resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ of Nazareth we go into AD - In 70 AD the temple is destroyed In 136 AD the Romans (ruled by Emperor Hadrian) named the area of modern Israel "Paleshtina" as an insult to the Jews after the Bar Kokhba revolt (because the Philistines were the enemy of ancient Israel). In 343 AD the Christians take over the Roman empire, this was not a violent take over; it was by conversion In 395 AD the Romans split In 636 AD the Muslims invade, forcibly converting the Christians and Jews to Islam or killing them or enslaving them or running them off by force In 1099 AD the Christians recapture Jerusalem and the surrounding areas, establishing the Crusader States In 1291 AD the Mamluk Muslims invaded and took over the area, forcefully converting the Christians and Jews back to Islam In 1517 AD the Ottoman empire invaded and conquered the region In 1918 AD after World War I the Christians took back over the region, this was taken by England In 1948 AD England "gives" the land back to the Jews and Israel is reestablished. In 1948 AD it was not "given back" to the Jews exactly; there was a war following the 1947 UN partition plan, later, in 1948, following the declaration of the establishment of the State of Israel on May 14, 1948, Arabs launched a military intervention in what became the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, resulting in Israel gaining control of more land than allocated in the UN plan. In present time, Israel owns the land and gave the Arabs who identify as "Palestinians" a piece of land called Gaza, in return Hamas (ruler of Gaza) sends Islamic terrorists to kill innocent civilians in Israel on October the 7th (just to name one example of the many examples) and declares Jihad; they want to take over Israel by force through murder, terrorism and destruction. So who has the right to the land? Israel. But let's give more facts and details: - If we look into the Bible and the Torah it is clear it belongs to Israel (the Jews). - Jews owned the land for 1411 years, the Muslims for 1090 years and the Christians for 515 years; so by years it belongs to the Jews. - If the land belongs to the Natives of the land; the Natives of the land are Jews so it belongs to the Jews - The "Philistines" are the ancient enemy of the Jewish people (which are not the Arabs that call themselves "Palestinians" today, and those people (the Philistines) are long gone from the world today) - The Roman empire called the land "Paleshtina" as an insult as mentioned above and not "Palestine" actually, "Palestine" is just a misinterpreted of the word "Paleshtina" - The matter of the fact is that "Palestine" and the "Palestinian people" are not more than a fiction, a fake, a propaganda made by the Arabs and Muslim world - Israelis have no other country to go to, and this is the decisive truth that helped Israel win all its wars. Israelis have nowhere to go, therefore every war and every conflict is an existential threat to Israel. Muslims have about 50 countries, to live, go to, etc. Facts, history and common sense says Israel belongs to the Jews and Islam is a threat to every human life; the Jew, the Christian and even the unbeliever.

muslims are only muslims cz of the absurdity of islam not despite it but bczzz of it actually; i'm an ex muslim myself and i know the feeling hhhh

Same, most of muslims i knew are well-behaved until i asked them something i read from the Quran. They change attitude. Later i found out that the thing they’ve been doing called “Taqiya” which is pretending they’re (muslims) friendly, hospitable towards non-muslims but disgust non-muslims. They’re basically taught to be liar.

the Quran reads like it was written by a mentally handicapped person

A happy cultist 😄

It's like the Greek language it has classical Greek.

Sheep have difficulty with language Arabic or any other Language But they are good at following other sheep!

A lot of Christians don't know Aremaic. What's your point?

With ppls Ignorance, they're using Arabic as catholicism did with Latin. Same thing. Keep ppl in error.

​@fakhriassad2801, we have God's Word in English! That is the "difference."

Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context. The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites: Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders, Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite: Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization. The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا) Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as will be explained. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language." "protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining protoS 29th is a س written in a different position, but was shoehorned to obfuscate. This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

​@@mznxbcv12345 well said my friend ,appreciate it so much 👍

you guys were under the Roman empire when Jesus was around. The Anglo, the Portoguese, Germanic, Jews etc. So by this logic you all should naturally follow Christianity or Judaism based on which community you were closer to. If Asterix and Obelix serves as a work of literature, it shows the relationship between the Romans and the Gauls etc. etc.

@@mimimercado762Germany was never Roman

😂😂😂

@@Hedgehogz856 In ancient times, the region now known as Germany was partially under Roman control. It wasn’t fully occupied by the Romans and was not a unified country, rather a collection of various smaller kingdoms, but the land was still under Roman control.

​@@Marco_My_Wordsit was not the border was the Rhine river wich may be modern Germany but the Germanic tribes that were originally there were killed or retreated across the Rhine the Germanic people never were subjugated they fought to hard the celts in modern day england were defeated though

Most Muslims will never see or acknowledge the truth. They will be the right hand of the Beast, and enjoy every minute of it. Well, until they are turned into walking dead men, torn apart by birds.

What utter drivel. Arabic is the oldest continually spoken language in world. Back when English didn’t even have a script resembled German more than any entire encyclopedia were written in Arabic.

@@ranro7371 how very peculiar to see muslims/islam trying to re-write history...simultaniously claiming "facts" w/o proof

@@ranro7371 Mohammed was a peddo. If your god anoints a peddo for his final revelation you are following idiocy.

@@ranro7371 _Here is a factual statement. The Arabic language is the original from which developed off the Aramaic and "Semetic" langauges._ Except the Old Testament of the Bible is written in Hebrew, not Aramaic which makes your comment irrelevant since the Bible is in Hebrew, not Aramaic, two different languages. And Arabic is not the original language, that's historically false.

Wow, that's very interesting, very much confirms what David is saying here, thank you.

Exactly. Fallacies, all of them.

Yes,, yes they would follow blindly because of your barbaric ways of torture and death for the slightest infraction. Who would dare say anything different? Are you too thick in the skull to understand that?

ALL three statements involve systematic indoctrination, which one expects in a Cult.

This is what centuries of inbreeding and punishing believers for _thinking_ does to people.

Rest easy friend. The "God of the universe" didn't give man the Qur'an, that Dark malignant, deceiving character did.

And, when copying in moonlight/starlight/candlelight/oil lamplight, could a dot/slash etc., be distinguished from a blemish in the parchment?

No about knowing how to read or write. It's about Allah that Muslims claim to be a Creator of all things but Allah didn't know Muhammed was unable to read. So Allah doesn't know his creation.

Kind of a poor argument seeing as the Torah was written in ancient Hebrew before vowel markings as well.

@@AliciaGuitarthe Jews in this time can still read and write the languages they used over 2000y ago

maybe because it's a divine book that keeps on giving. a book of 500 pages has been studied for 1400 years and people are still finding new things. you don't understand it because you don't deserve to. you will only understand it when you beat your ego and realise that you are nothing and submit to allah only then does allah reach back and allow you to feel his presence

The god of Judaism, Christianity and Islam is EVIL and WICKED. Read the bible with UNDERSTANDING

@@btc-news Wow, you dare to judge is that allowed in your religion?

@@btc-news Mental illness must be the reason people believe in fantasy like Islam

​@@btc-news If you're a casual reader or a book critique who's just into ancient/old literature why would you submit to "Allah" just to read it? LMAO 😂

I was thinking the same thing!

YOU SEE...Dawood believes in pagan telepathy, he is not a Christian! YOU SEE!😅

You should’ve said “if a book can be read then a book can be translated” 😂

@@LeniPeni That works too. But when we read the q🕳️u🕳️r🕳️a🕳️n and point out the nonsense in it, they demand we learn arabic. It’s more than the reading that I was calling out.

@@EricDG326 I meant that it’s incredibly hard to understand even if you’re an expert in the language like David said. So it can’t be read and that’s why it can’t even be translated

Exactly brother

The examples cited are misrepresented, indeed that very misrepresentation is answered in the same Surahs of the verses he cites: Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32, which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind. Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16, in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders. Surah Yasin, Surah 34, Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Qura. The same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite: Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7 The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178 - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Nisaa Aya 46 - Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya 48 - shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind Surah Al-Anbiya Aya 107 - The role of the prophet Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. It's the word Isa PBUH (Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J). Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), adducted from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha). The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as aforementioned. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. In addition,The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name." "protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

Praise God!!!

🤣🤣 I smell the grudge of the minorities of the Middle East in your comment

Any advice on learning Arabic?

@@muhammadsair3598 of course, what else would you say? instead of addressing the subject directly you take the Islamic approach of personal attacks. Thank you and God bless you. (Between you and me, No dear Sir I have no grudges, as a former WAFA translator in the early 2000, and reading the reports directly from the field, I got so sick and got diabetes which still with me until now. WAFA is the Palestinian News Agency, I got sick due to my emotional involvements with what humanly happened Palestinians, I have dozens of stories that give me nightmares, but to be honest, one has to be honest)

I believe that there are videos and college progtams to do so.@@danielcarlsen8975

So a Catholic Pope is Mohammed?

Read with her Isaiah 53 and share with her Romans 1, 2, 3, 4 , Ephesians "But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach; That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. ... For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher? And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things! But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah saith, Lord, who hath believed our report? So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." (Romans 10:8-9,13-17)

May God touch her heart and her soul and may his light permeate her heart Amen! Over here on Nigeria even 8 year olds are married to rotten old men in pursuance of the ways of the desert Pedophet.

May Christ deliver her.

@@ranro7371 _pray to who? The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. Sounds familiar?_ That's a false equivocation, using two different words as saying the same thing, when they don't. Please stop your fallacies, please. At best that's two words similarly spelled that mean two different things, which is called, gramatically, a homograph. Your claim is dishonest.

If she's being forced then it has nothing to do with islam, simple.

beauty can be found in many books,,many are just fiction ,as in all religious books,,gods are a delusion

The examples cited are misrepresented, indeed that very misrepresentation is answered in the same Surahs of the verses he cites: Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32, which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind. Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16, in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders. Surah Yasin, Surah 34, Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Qura. The same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite: Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7 The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178 - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Nisaa Aya 46 - Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya 48 - shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind Surah Al-Anbiya Aya 107 - The role of the prophet Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. It's the word Isa PBUH (Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J). Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), adducted from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha). The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as aforementioned. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. In addition, The word God in hebrew is eloah, is a cognate of the Arabic I-L-H, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it into eloh, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elah. Infact it is written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic cause it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا) "protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real

" .... older than the oldest recorded writing." Absolute rubbish.

Part 2 Language; When you look at the actual linguistics, you'll find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" (why in quotes will be revealed later) languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). |Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects | | Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects | | Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian | Arabic is the only corollary to proto-semitic, infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language." God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

Let's start with a simple sentence: The house is big. How would you say it in different Semitic languages? Arabic: البيتُ كبيرٌ al-bayt-u kabīr-un Proto-Semitic: *ʔal-bayt-u kabīr-u Hebrew: הבית גדול ha-bayit gadol Akkadian: bītum rabûm Amharic: ቤቱ ገደሉ betu gedelu Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (noun-adjective), the same definite article (al-), and the same case endings (-u for nominative). Hebrew and Akkadian have lost the case endings and changed the definite article (ha- and -um respectively). Amharic has changed the word order (adjective-noun) and the definite article (u-). But Arabic is not only similar to Proto-Semitic, it is also pre-Semitic, meaning that it is the original form of Semitic before it split into different branches. This is because Arabic preserves many features that are not found in any other Semitic language, but are found in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. These features include: - The definite article al-, which is derived from the demonstrative pronoun *ʔal- 'that'. This article is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the article n- in Berber and the article p-, t-, n- in Egyptian. - The dual number for nouns and verbs, which is marked by the suffix -ān or -ayn. This number is rare in other Semitic languages, but it is common in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. - The imperfective prefix t- for verbs, which indicates the second person singular feminine or third person plural feminine. This prefix is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the prefix t- in Berber and Egyptian. - The passive voice for verbs, which is marked by the infix t between the first and second root consonants. This voice is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the passive voice in Egyptian and Berber. Finally, let's look at a more complex sentence: The letter was written with a pen. Arabic: كُتِبَتِ الرِّسَالَةُ بِالقَلَمِ kutiba-t al-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Proto-Semitic: *kutiba-t ʔal-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Hebrew: המכתב נכתב בעט ha-michtav niktav ba-et Akkadian: šipram šapāru bēlum Egyptian: sḏm.n.f p-ẖry m rnp.t Berber: tturra-t tibratin s uccen In the examples Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (verb-subject-object), the same passive voice marker (-t-), the same definite article (al-), and the same preposition (bi-). Hebrew has changed the word order (subject-verb-object), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (ha-) and the preposition (ba-). Akkadian has changed the word order (object-subject-verb), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (-um) and the preposition (bēlum). These examples show that classical Arabic has more consonants and vowels than other semitic languages, and that it preserves some sounds that were lost or changed in other semitic languages. This means that classical Arabic can encode more information in a given unit of speech than other semitic languages, and that it is closer to the original sound system of protosemitic., we can see that classical Arabic has more grammatical features than the other languages, such as case endings, mood endings, and root and pattern system. These features make classical Arabic more expressive and precise than the other languages, as it can convey more information and nuances in a single word or phrase. Classical Arabic is also more flexible than the other languages, as it can use different word orders and verb forms to emphasize different aspects of the sentence. Classical Arabic is therefore older and more original than the other languages. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language." Matter of fact that all this, and the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and the complexity all of it was derived from the Qur'an, it was by analysing the syntactic structure of the Quran that the Arabic root system was developed, first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage (of the same language) dictionary of its kind, preceding the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years, that the concept of Arabic root was developed and later co-opted into "semitic root" that the ancient scripts were deciphered, they quite literally copy pasted the entirey of Arabic root. hebrew had been dead, and so were all the other dialects of Arabic until being "revived" in a frankensteinian fashion in the 18th, 19th centuries. The whole region spoke basically the same language, mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language became more degenerate and then the Quran appears with the oldest form possible of the language thousands of years later It is why the Arabs back then were challenged to produce 10 verses similar, and they couldnt. People think it's a miracle becau'e they couldnt do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself, they had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision behind it. And I quite literally mean, mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of yeara later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before and in the highest form the language had ever taken and the language is lexically, syntactically, phonemically and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing, infact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it, and not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book that in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take, so high infact it is theoretically not possible to surpass it all in a script that had never been recorded before and so the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began and age of reason and rationality was born from its study God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

Why didn't God provide the translations himself? He could've avoided any confusion, and spread his message quicker, thus avoiding unnecessary wars.

​@@garyphisher7375God didn't write the bible, so God can't provide translation. But Allah wrote the quran through a single prophet.

@@destinyglorious5637 You need to add Alllah AKA Mhmd!

@@destinyglorious5637 Q: Why is it that anytime Allah's forces come against Israel, with overwhelming forces, Israel wins ???

@@studygodsword5937coz Christians jews satan and illuminati band together to fight a small number of the 1 and only true religion forces

I've noticed the same issue with the Quran. The chapters and verses aren't in chronological order. Chapter 9 of the Quran comes in the beginning of the book, but yet according to the Hadiths, its the soo called last group of revelations Mohammed "received", so technically it should come at the end of the book and not the beginning. The Quran is a disaster.

@@ranro7371 if that’s the case then allah made som big historical blunders such as Mary being a part of the trinity, mistaking Ezra for the son of God, mistaking Mary the mother of Jesus for the sister of Moses and Aaron and denying Jesus died at crucifixtion.

The Bible is not chronological

@crazysphynxcatlady3359 it is. Genesis to Revelation. The beginning to the end of times

The story is that when it got compiled the secretary dropped the pages. 🤣

@@ranro7371 That's all very interesting information. I have extensively studied several languages from four different linguistic families, so I find all this fascinating. But, what does that have to do with the message contained in the Quran?

@@ranro7371 You just wasted A LOT OF TIME copying/pasting useless information. No one cares about a book wriiten in a language spoken by less than 2% of the world. The fact remains, the quran is a literary garbabe pile, full of scientific, historic and grammatical errors; disorganized and self-contradictory. *Dr. Seuss wrote better that "allah" (a.k.a., Muhammed) did* .

The recitation stinks, too. If there's a collection of sounds that by themselves have the power to send a soul to hell, it's the Arabic language. Which I (regrettably) can speak, in a fashion, after having lived in the middle east for a time.

@@ranro7371Hebrew is older than Arabic. Your religion is about 600 years far later than when the Bible got canonised.

The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites: Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders, Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite: Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. It's the word Isa PBUH (Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J). Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), adducted from the Arabic original of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum of A-L-L-H (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha). Language; When you look at the actual linguistics, you'll find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" (why in quotes will be revealed later) languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). |Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects | | Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects | | Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian | Matter of fact that all this, and the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and the complexity all of it was derived from the Qur'an, it was by analysing the syntactic structure of the Quran that the Arabic root system was developed, first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, preceding the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years, that the concept of Arabic root was developed and later co-opted into "semitic root" that the ancient scripts were deciphered, they quite literally copy pasted the entirey of Arabic root. hebrew had been dead, and so were all the other dialects of Arabic until being "revived" in a frankensteinian fashion in the 18th, 19th centuries. The whole region spoke basically the same language, mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language became more degenerate and then the Quran appears with the oldest form possible of the language thousands of years later It is why the Arabs back then were challenged to produce 10 verses similar, and they couldnt. People think it's a miracle becau'e they couldnt do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself, they had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision behind it. And I quite literally mean, mathematical. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-semitic, infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of yeara later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before and in the highest form the language had ever taken and the language is lexically, syntactically, phonemically and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing, infact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it, and not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book that in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take, so high infact it is theoretically not possible to surpass it all in a script that had never been recorded before and so the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began and age of reason and rationality was born from its study

Because this is the internet I have to lead with this: I agree with you. Now, here's a related point that is valuable to know and I want to simply share it, not debate it. Only after protestant Christians printed copies of the New Testament in English AND taught people to read in English has the western world known what it was saying. Before, Catholics only printed it and read it in Latin at mass and didn't print extra copies and didn't teach the people to read Latin or understand what was being read to them. Once the protestants produced the Geneva editions, the Church of England, considered "Anglo-Catholic" or simply put not protestant, worked to print the King James Version. Sources say it is "unclear" whether the Church of England is "in communion with Rome" but I digress.

It is better written, but was written in the context of a living church/ecclesiastical apostolic organisation

They are both fairytale books

@@aacc-sy3sd _They are both fairytale books_ That's the biggest fairytale of them all that the Bible is a fairytale.

@@ranro7371 if that’s the case allah also made some big historical blunders such as Mary being a part of the trinity, mistaking Ezra for being the son of God, mistaking Mary the mother of Jesus for the sister of Moses and Aaron. Yeah really looks inspired.

@@ranro7371 So why is there Jewish Folklore in the Perfectly Preserved Holey qur'an? Didn't your allah know? 🤣

Does the 11th dimension require your imagination to envision how life forms might function there?

That is becaue they are told not to argue, object or doubt. They are told that is a sin worse than murder. They are also told that sharia commands them to prevent anyone else from critically analysing their scripture, and they can use any means available; from insults and shouting over them to physical violence. If this occurred in cult majority countries they would simply have such people executed.

@@ranro7371 _Matter of fact that all this,..._ It's already shown that nothing you are saying is a matter of fact except for the Koran being written in Arabic.

@@ranro7371 _Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations_ Why are you trolling, troll, as you will ignore this and not reply to it? But which that claim is discredited by the fact that all of that is because of one person, Mohammad, and isn't corroborated by anything else and no one is obligated to accept the uncorroborated, unsubstantiated claims of Mohammad. In other words, none of that means anything anyone is obligated to accept.

lol right

@@ranro7371 and who backs Mohammed? Who can vouch for him? No one, he did no miracles, no prophecy etc., no angels declared him, no scriptures foretold of him, no nothing. Just him and his word. You've been brainwashed by a cult. And yes I know about the sandstorm and the magic horse ride etc. God Bless!

The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites: Surah An-Nisaa Aya 46 which Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context. Infact even the examples he is using, Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders, Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite: Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet

I, myself, have read the Bible, Quran and parts of Bhagadavad Gita. It is important to read those scriptures at least once and then it’s harder for people to manipulate you.

You are scared to argue with Muslim I know 😂

@@muhammadsair3598 Far from it. I’ve argued with multiple Muslims.

I'll save my time of reading for God's word and Worship. I trust David's talents.

@@Earthangeljoela Tell the truth and calls sinners to repentance and placing their faith in Jesus Christ for salvation.

The word you are looking for is - "shite"

It is not a religion its a cult .

Yeah, Thomas actually wanted to have peace with some Muslims who had been raiding American shipping vessels and enslaving the crews and he asked what kind of arrangement they could make to get that to stop. They told him that was impossible because their prophet commanded them to wage war and enslave anyone who wasn’t Muslim. So I’m not surprised that once he was told that he wanted to find out what else their prophet asked of them.

@@ranro7371yeah, we’ve seen your replies to every other comment on this video. We’re trying to talk about Thomas Jefferson right now though, luckily he wrote in English so we know what he had to say.

damn must be scary satanic religion he faced there

Winston Churchill as well.

😂😂😂

​@@muhammadsair3598bro was possessed by Muhammad 💀💀

God bless you my Assyriam bro in Christ!!!

@@FriendlyEvangelist God bless you too, brother ✝️

@@ranro7371 _Here is a factual statement. The Arabic language is the oldest continually spoken language in the world, back._ The facts say that's not a factual statement.

Just try addressing the issues raised in the video. That is what the comments section is for. Pick one of David's claims and see if you can show why he is wrong. Good luck.

​@jazzymilesmiles3308We have Greeks and bible scholars whi studied Hebrew in our church so we have no trouble with getting the text in uts original language. By the way it still says the same thing no matter what language and we know this as we are a mostly African church who read the bible in West African languages and when compared to the Greek, Hebrew and English it says the same thing.

@jazzymilesmiles3308 You are contradicting yourself. Can you read Arabic? If you can read Arabic, why do you need an Imam? If you can't read Arabic, and need an Imam, you are being a hypocrite since you are the same as you are accusing Christians of being.

God is not the author of confusion but Satan is

@@ranro7371 Irrelevant. No one has to accept what Mohammad says.

@@ranro7371 The facts are that is false Arabic is the oldest continually spoken language of the world. Chinese, Aramaic and Sanskrit are older. You really should refrain from Islamic indoctrinated propaganda. You are as bad as the Catholic church!

Same lol

Beneficial? Read the Song of Solomon. In your bible.

@@muhammadsair3598 funny thing is Muslim tell us mohammeds name is in songs of Solomon which are love letters between Solomon and wife used for marriage counseling in Christianity.

​@@adjoa-anima Beat me to it. We're waiting, stone-kisser.

@@adjoa-anima love letters or pure porn ?

Doubt brings the Muslim to hellfire 🔥 and so the endless loop continues.

Yes that’s how it works. If you start doubting you burn in hell forever so don’t do it. That’s how they get you to never give up Islam.

@@ranro7371 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Still copying and pasting lies while you want others to fall for it stupidly like you do, Abdul?? The very 1st premise of Arabic being the oldest is super hilariously stupid because there are at least 3 or more languages that are waaaay older and still in use today!!! So therefore, your entire copy paste is totally meaningless because like the weak religion we hilariously call Islame, it’s crumbling like a thin wall of cards!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@ranro7371 still copying and pasting meaningless text which no one cares to read when your very 1st premise is already stupid??? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Nope really he try to cover Allah`s light but I moved by beauty of Quran

We know what depraved liars muslims are.