🤩

The defendants all get surprised Pikachu face when they’re asked who they’re going to hire…

This judge takes no BS.

Yeah, that's the first one of those I've seen, I thoroughly enjoyed it.

The defense attorney trying not to laugh is great too

All judges should handle entitled, ungrateful, defiant defendants this way! Unless there is a genuine conflict of interest, they should get one attorney. Period.

And she rips through massive arraignment dockets (but with due consideration), then completely changes speed and listens intently to all TPO testimonies. Let's them spill all the beans. She takes DV, the potential for DV or intimidation, and the safety of all parties very seriously! I think we'd all like to go out to dinner, have a drink, play a round of golf etc with her and hers.

@@shotforshot5983 Well said!

😤

Are we talking about the judge saying defendants had to stay with the first lawyer or have none? Don't they all have a right to an attorney unless THEY say they want to go it alone? Meaning if someone was hard-headed enough to say no, I'm not representing myself, and I am not taking the first lawyer you appointed so give me a new one, is the judge allowed to make a defendant go alone? I thought people had a right to an attorney? And I've seen many defendants switch lawyers for various reasons, some to waste time but some genuinely didn't get along with their lawyer. If a trial went ahead and the defendant believed they had no choice but to go alone because they believed the judge, couldn't that case be thrown out due to the defendant not having his rights exercised due to the judge lying to him and saying he had to take the first lawyer or get nothing? I may have it all wrong, I'm not in the states, but I thought everyone was entirely to an attorney even if they fire the first one and ask for another. I get what you're saying though, many defendants use it as a way to stall procedures, my issue is the judge is supposed to protect everyone's rights, including criminals and they are supposed to be at the top morally, can a judge make a defendant stay with the appointed lawyer, and make a defendant defend themselves if they don't want that lawyer for whatever reason? If not, surely morally this judge is not setting a good example.

@@gemmacook1753 you are right, they are allowed an attorney. If they can show they cannot afford a private attorney one will be appointed from the public defenders office. At no charge (other than a small admin feenin some places). Bit, the suspect cannot pick and choose. They are getting a real, certified attorney at taxpayer expense. They cannot swap them out. Some place are more lenient and I saw one case where the suspect went through 3 lawyers before the judge says STOP. Many times it is to create delay in the trial, sometimes the suspect wants to have a wild and often illegal defense and the lawyer explains that it is not allowed so the suspect wants a new lawyer (this is apparently what happens most of the time). Lastly, sometimes amperson thinks they know the law better than the lawyers and the judge so they try to represent themselves. 99.99% fail.

😂

🤩

Exactly! Judge asked a reasonable question and we get this epic non-sequitur.

I second the motion of More Judge Medrano

I always wanted one of Debbie's goats to appear in court. The screaming goat is as near as possible to my wish. Now if they only had a court room in "Goat Simulator" my life would be complete.

@@kayb9979 She's actually had her goats on before. We met little Mikey!

@@AmandaBooBerry Yes, I remember something like that, but a goat physically present in court would be hilarious. It may have happened in the Middle Ages but it wouldn't happen these days.

@@kayb9979 😂

She does sound similar to a deaf lady I knew, that had become deaf after already learning to speak

She also sounds like she has a foreign accent

I also picked up on that right away. Too bad others didn't know that either

Yea, I believe that’s what it is. That or she lost her hearing at a young age, but can still hear a bit (maybe hearing aids or naturally) to where she can still speak but certain consonants and vowels don’t come out “properly” due to the way she hears herself. I commend her, though, for the mere fact that she doesn’t let it hold her back, notably in a profession that has her speaking a lot among a crowd. That is pretty awesome. I don’t have any issues with my speech and I still sound like nails on a chalkboard with anxiety through the roof if having to speak to the public in that manner lol. She seems very comfortable and rather professional. Edit: reading she may be from West Africa, so there may be a slight difference in pronunciation, as well. Also fluent in other languages. Now that is immigration done right.

I was thinking the same thing. She also appears to be looking down and reading (voice to text) as others are speaking. I had a Correctional Officer I supervised that had lost most of his hearing in a horrible fire. He did amazing with his Cochlear implant. Her voice is way more melodic than his though. 🤣

Couldn't agree more!

🤩🙌

Thank you

Lawful law

@@cjt9938 Thank you! My day has been made!😆

🤩 I have prior videos in fact I think I will make a playlist

He was demonstrating how badly he needs a lawyer 😊

😘

Some states are currently revising their bail reforms on grounds on high risks assessments. Wisconsin is one of those states with such light bond systems. That bond system isn't limited in Milwaukee either.

😂

That would have sped things up a little 😂

Thank you

Thank you 😘

Every time he says, Your lawyer doesn't want to be your lawyer anymore, "I crack up!!