If you really wanna get down to brass tacks just add a little weight The ford But you can't be mad at them for making a lite truck GM does not even offer the 6.2 in a 2 wheel drive truck and you cannot get a 6.2 in a lower trim level that being said the extra weight won't make a difference F150 will still edge it out

are y’all putting the 4x4 trucks into 4 high before racing them?? if not you’re doing a disservice to the extra weight and cost of the 4x4 system

2017+ Raptor.

@@StyfeLife The raptor is slower than a regular F150 The fastest truck over all you can buy right now is a 2 door short bed 2wd 5.0 f150 could be a close race with a 2 door 3.5 eco boost

The Fast Lane Truck gear ratios play a big part. 3.73 ford all day.

Or just race them all at once

I’m betting on ram for 3rd

​@@darkfire8615 Nissan would have beat that Ram like a red headed step child!!

At least a 3.55 gear ratio….

Probably 3.73

Ford kicking ass taking names

At altitude turbos win every time.

Christopher King the 3.5 eco bests everything at any altitude

RichUltraStreet76 stock compared to stock sure

RichUltraStreet76 6.2 and 5.7 dustvit at sea level go back to your v6 Ford Focus

let's also not forget that the Titan has a 7 speed auto whereas the F-150 has a 10 speed auto.

@@chpman2013 and

Little over built. Stock block can easily take 1000 hp.

Lol 3.5 or 5.0 has no chance at sea level. Fact. Lookup pickup trucks.com

@@Mctsep Those of us that live at more than sea level and who pull loads up hills don't care about sea level drag races when it comes to trucks.

Right I got the 2020 and off went my muffler lol. Mechanic says 60 percent of ram owners run straight pipe

My 2015 5.0 FX4 with the 3.31 pulls pretty hard up top. I've heard the new 5.0s pull even harder and are likely underrated.

satalac The Fx4 is a very nice package. You've got a hell of a truck there! My brother recently purchased a 2018 F150 with the new 10 speed with the 5.0 and a 3.31 rear axle. It pulls very well for being a supercrew and a 4x4. The only thing I would change personally is the 3.55 with the rear locker. It's a great in between axle for towing and for the highway. Good gas mileage yet it still gets up and goes.

Love my 2015 with the 5.0, 4X4 and the 3.55 rear. It's like driving around a mustang without all the negatives of a mustang.

The 2018 5.0 is way, way quicker than the 2015-2017 5.0s.

B C It is a little bit quicker but not by much. My brother has an 18 with the 5.0 and the 10 speed and my new 2018 2.7 (same cab configuration as my brothers) is quicker than his. I know the axle ratio plays a big role so they are closer than our two but it's not as big of a difference from the 15s-17s.

I want to see a 2.7 ecoboost (2nd Gen) vs 2.7 Chevy turbo 4 cylinder Ike gauntlet so bad.

I can't believe big brother 6.2 can't do it. I have a 2019 5.0 STX the lightest version on E85, at least 500 lbs lighter than the fully loaded one. It will pull way harder than the one shown here.

MarcoBala92 I bet it does....5.0’s are fast!

MarcoBala92 Also 2wd, that helped a lot. Still, though, those coyotes are fast.

Are you guys delusional? You're all so biased it hurts my brain. Have any of you heard about driveline loss? There is MASSIVE difference between a 2wd and 4x4 truck with the same engine/trans. I have a rcsb 2wd 4.7 5 speed 02 Dakota and it beats my buddies 2020 f150 5.0 10 speed. So does that mean I should go around saying all 4.7 Dakota's beat 5.0 10 speed Ford's? The lack of logic you guys have is alarming.

@@92clintonr you are spot on! Take the same truck/motor set up and only variable is 2/4wd and the 2 will walk all day… That being said ecoboost fords are incredibly fast… I love my ‘18 2.7 You would think a big pushrod 6.2 would demolish a smaller v8 but GM vehicles are heavier than fords and the Nissan has never stood a chance… lol

Gotta remember 5.0 has 2x the valves and ect if the 6.2 came out of a vette detuned a little but just like the one in the ferd with the 6600 rpm limit it would take it

You can hear it in the engine sound... That coyote breathes and revs. You can always get more power from more dispacement and less weight will be easier to accelerate than more but porbably the most important part here is DOHC vs pushrod. Would be interesting to see how they compare on a road course... then weight, breaking, and mid-range power start to become more important than being able to scream along at high rpms.

Love our Hemi 💪 Best truck of the bunch

It only took then 10 years to get it to not suck.

Chuck Beef WHAT LOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

Two-Face 5.0L has been a losing powerplant since its inception in 08. It is only recently they have finally figured out the clues to unlocking its potential. 17 and 18 are the only years since 1994 that the Mustang has been on par with a Camaro.

@@ChuckBeefOG 2002 - 2009

Levi P there was no Camaro in those years.

To bad its tethered to such a shitty rear end.

Justin Reily okay so you get the Ford in 4x4 with the 3.31 gears or better yet 3.55. Same outcome or worse. What’s happening here is the gm under achieves and the Ford over achieves. Also consider that they run nearly identical transmissions but you clearly hear gm’s torque management interfering. That’s the real reason it lost. Gms trans programming stinks. I’ve driven many miles in 6l80e and 6r80 equipped trucks and gm’s shifting is completely artificial feeling there is just not positive engagement. Were as the Ford is quicker and more positive.

Justin Reily, you are so correct. The fact that the gmc had to carry around the extra transfer case is the reason why it lost, if the ford had a 4x4 system in it then the gmc would have completely smoked the f-150.

Stop all the bullshit cheerleading. Drag racing 101...same hp but way lighter is a win everytime. You Ford fanboys need to understand that. Some of the comments are pretty damn funny.

Riley Moberg A couple hundred pounds isn’t going to slow it down a car length 😂 coyote would still win

@@rileymoberg4053 If the Ford were a 4X4 it would likely have had a 3.55 or 3.73 rear end which would probably offset the couple of hundred pound difference the 4X4 system would make. Ford would still have smoked that GMC's ass either way.

There's a guy on here (Maurice Cooper is the name of his channel) that has a RCSB 2018 5.0 2WD that ran a 13 something bone stock.

too slow and weak of a truck to compete with these bad boys.

What about the other 5.7 ??

@@dumbsmart what 5.7? you mean the iforce if your talking about the 5.7 hemi then your dead wrong.

kevin im talking about the tundra, I would just like to see how it performs against these. It’s probably the slowest but I would still like to see

@@dumbsmart here is a 5.7 hemi vs 5.7 iforce it might not be a 2020 but same engine. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qLGZZctqt9iwpYk.html

Barbara Schenck actually its just little faster than 3.5 EB. There are videos on YT to prove it

@@konradjoseph4740 Not at a mile high. At sea level, the Coyote may have a chance, but up here the 3.5EB has no real competition.

My brother just bought one. A 2018 five-oh not sure if it has 10spd but he is a few lengths behind my 2015 6.2L dbl cab in a race to 100mph.

Barbara Schenck Yeah, would definitely go with the 5.0.

6,2l kills both 3.5 and 5.0 in texas

My dad owns a ram and that thing has a v8 and feels like it can barely pull itself its too heavy so id say ram is slowest

Nissan is the slowest. It's been done.

Nissan would've killed F150 if it was 4x4

@@RevolutionRoad 🤣🤣🤣

And reliable while doing it compare to the old triton

@@DoctorRickSanchez I recently switched from a Focus ST to an F-150 with a 5.0. I was so shocked at how quick the truck is. It's almost as exhilarating to drive as the car was, and a lot more practical while doing it.

@@SergeantSniffles True you get the fun like a sporty car and a bed for anything...best of both worlds lol and you can run 93 octane whenever you want since is flexfuel.

Agree. At best, a tie.

@@SergeantSniffles 3.5 Ecoboost wrecks them all

5.Slow 😎💪🏽

No way, the dodge sounded the best

Nacho Martinez definitely the Titan it's got all the rasp

Agreed! Titan, Coyote, Hemi, then the 6.2

the titan is so under-appreciated its sad, its such a great truck

Jacques Dufrene it really is! Had one as a rental 2 years ago (in the dark silver which looks GREAT on that) and for fun a covered up the badges and asked my friends if they knew what it was No one guessed Nissan and were all blown away when I showed them the badge It was the interior that impressed people the most! Haha a few even thought I was lying when I said it was a Nissan I’m honestly more a Ford/Toyota man, but that Titan really is one hell of a truck! (And really does sound amazing especially in person!) If I was in the market for a new truck I would seriously consider getting the Titan!

Learn the difference between DOHC and pushrod. Bet the GMC gets better fuel economy.

@@shadowwolfmandan Nope, the 5.0 F-150 is rated 3 mpg higher than the Sierra 1500 6.2 with the same cab configuration.

Not sure most could notice the diff on a computer screen. I don't think my poor 2013 Mac Pro retina display could.

Ahhhh umm most people can't even see a difference. They see 4k so 4k must be good! Good must be better! It's not that big of a deal on 27" or less LCD which is what you have.

1080p to 1440p is easily noticeable on a 24 inch monitor. Many people have 27 inch monitors and 4k on that would be easily noticeable. Also I use an HTPC with a 65 inch screen and can immediately tell when a video on yt switches over to 4k.

@@Chris_Harris this might be true for someone who's watching on a monitor but with a large tv you certainly can see the difference .

When it comes to trucks, no one has more history, knowledge, and reputation like Ford. The rest are just copy cats who wait for ford to do something revolutionary so they can make cheap knock offs.

Since when was the Coyote 3rd most powerful? I mean yeah, Ford does shit on everything right now (and I love it because im a Ford guy) but the 5.0L makes the most horsepower of any current F-150 engine at 395hp and the ties the 2.7L Ecoboost in peak torque at 400lb/ft albeit a little higher up in the rev band.

If you're talking max hp it's 2nd only to the Raptor. Unless you're including the new 7.3 V8 but that's not available in the F-150.

@@MrInzombia ford owners won't leave the cult no matter how unreliable they are.

@@jldude84 5.0 is 3rd.....3.5 HO in the raptor and limited i believe then the 3.5 ecoboost then the 5.0

Cope

LOL. The 5.0 Coyote is so much faster than the 5.3L trucks, it's not even close. Not saying you didn't win a race but clearly there's other unstated factors involved, Like the F150 could have been much heavier, with less gear and big heavy wheels and tires, and/or he got a poor launch, and so on and so on. There are so many different factors and variations and then you add in mods, etc,. it changes everything. But all things being mostly equal, the Ford Coyote trucks are MUCH faster then the 5.3 Chevy's.

Uhhhh a Dyno doesn't show shit. It shows power at the crank, NOT what actually gets to the wheels, NOT what the truck does with the power once it hits the wheels. Dyno just shows you the power that is already advertised AT THE CRANK. Power at the crank means NOTHING. As for underrated, it makes NO sense. They sell these trucks based on numbers. Whatever power they have at the crank is listed as so. Whatever is at the wheel (two MAJORLY different numbers) they show. Sheesh pls to be learning about your mechanicals before posting. God, dyno showing real power? Christ that's about the dumbest post I've seen since the beginning of the forum.

@@Chris_Harris wtf are you talking about. A dyno does show you wheel horsepower.

@@sootlifejew Sorry I thought you said an engine dyno. People keep bringing it up. Perhaps to the wheel in a perfect world and doesn't include a single environmental issue which IS a deal. That is to say, I know my F-150 falls behind on a particular road side by side with a Chevy because the weight loss actually causes my tires to spin with the grade we're racing on. There are more places than that too. My Ford beats its ass most of the time however it loses too. The point? Dyno numbers are something you put up and smile. Anyone who actually races knows much better than to rely on dyno results. This whole exercise shows that dyno numbers mean nothing because all the bigger engines with larger dyno numbers...they lost.

@@Chris_Harris A drag race is just as pointless as a dyno if you are going to argue like that. That’s not the point. A dyno can show you which car makes the most power and it matters just as much or as little as a drag race depending on how you look at it. Do you know that there are dyno competitions just like there are drag racing competitions?

@@tubechap8424 Except the Drag Race is indicative of what's happening in the real world. A dyno doesn't show that. All a dyno shows is the weight/speed/torque to get a set of tires to a set speed on a particular dyno's wheel with several assumptions like 7200RPM being about IT as far as where your power/weight/safety drops off. They're built with set power/air intake/fuel intake/about twenty points of temperature/timing etc. Also, 99% of the dynos can't handle a rotary car or any race car for that very matter because dyno's don't do well at 10,000 rpm. A full dyno is great at showing cars all at the same point on a wheel but they don't show how that car responds to moving on uneven surfaces, hell a WHOLE ton of things like keeping oil and other fluids pumping correctly when you're bumping and jerking around. There are literally a million things that change the performance of a vehicle that a dyno doesn't show. Sorry but dyno's are nice to paint a number on your car or truck but they have literally no bearing on what happens on the street. In fact, any dyno shop MUST street tune a car after they dyno it because so many of the metrics change while a car is driving and in motion.

Yup, lowest ratio 4x4 ford is a 3.31 instead of 3.15

​@@gregoryreimer9429 I have a 2019 it has 3.73s...I doubt they changed that

I have an 18 XLT XTR also. 5.0 COYOTE. Fastest vehicle I've ever driven. I've also had quite a few muscle cars in the past but the coyote is by far the fastest.

the coyote did win....???

4x4 nope

Actually faster to launch in 4H

MCLOVINBOSS429 hate to break it to you, but your Ford weighs 5300 pounds without all the other stuff you mentioned. My f150 fx4 2.7 crew cab xlt weighed in at 5300, my ram hemi big horn was 5450. Not much difference for ford's aluminum pos!

@@JohnDoe-nz6bk I've put it on a scale that is how i know also it's a base XLT extended cab

MCLOVINBOSS429 I put mine on the scale too. It's how in know!

No point. Every truck here would wax the 5.3L.

@@nathanmcdonald610 5.3 would wax all these in terms of reliability

@@jasonmcguire8772 not really the 5.3 was pretty even with the titan and there other vedio even tho it was down 40 hp

Nathan McDonald yea.. I asked my buddy about Chevy, and he even said the 5.3 is gutless, that ford and ram wouldn't smoke it.

AeonKage pound for pound the coyote is physically bigger and heavier than the 6.2L. Know your shit before you speak.

AJ 0311 You chevy fan boys keep crying, only to have chevy copy ford 5 years later.

@@tutoplis245 speaking of bigger and heavier, how's your wife doing?

@@tutoplis245 never mind I'll ask her later

AeonKage AeonKage you been coming up with that reply for the last 10 months? You probably could have done a google search and found something better. From the post on your profile I can see all that guitar hero you've been playing haven't been paying off, I've heard more musical talent in an elementary school music classes. Speaking of my wife, she did mention a handy capped adult that shit his pant in a Mall play room that she had rendered assistance to. From your comment I'm assuming it was you, you get all that crap cleaned up? I'm wait 10 months for your response.

Found On the Road Dead

@@RevolutionRoad wow 2 years later

I'm pretty sure they did that test already, check their past videos.

Yep, they already did it. The new Ford 6.7 PowerStroke destroyed all challengers

No normal working man towing 15k of equipment cares about 0-60. I’ve had lots of work trucks and it’s all about fuel mileage and how well it pulls the hills.

Clint Mullins If that’s how you console yourself.

@@inforthewin3231 you think that Chevy is the fastest? Even though the Ford is lighter and has more torque? Um..ok

They used to come geared way up like that back in the gas crunch era of the early 1970's to try and help conserve fuel consumption, but performance REALLY REALLY suffered in those smogger trucks back then seeing as they volume selling V8's barely made 150hp and had as little a 3-Speeds in the transmissions, for anything remotely resembling performance back then you had get the big block engine which even then maybe made 230hp on a good day with a 4-Speed manual. They were beautiful in design, but that truly was the dark ages for any kind of performance, I'm surprised anything modern uses a ratio that low since we are living in the era of more gears.

I agree, they are all very good. My preference is the GMC, but I REALLY wish they would let that 6.2 roll out in trim levels below the top...

Yea, number one due to fleet sales!

@@ShyaMiss i know its much heavier, but that gmc has to have some ridiculous restrictions on the 6.2 motor to lose to the f150. Im a ford guy myself (but currently own a tahoe) and would I buy a f150 first? Yes because I love them and its a much more raw feeling v8. But it would be interesting to see how beastly that 6.2 would be if gm released its full potential, or at least gave the option the way ford does on the end of the shifter to use sport mode. Who else agrees?

@@peytonhoward that 6.2 is really held back with the stock tuning. The amount of torque management is RIDICULOUS. To be honest, I dont understand why they do it to such an extent. They dont have to put a "hotrod" tune in them, but simply backing off on the torque management can REALLY improve the overall driveability. I have had a few of them, and they all gained mpg and dramatically better throttle response, with just a mild tune. Ford and Dodge both do it better than GM, in that regard.

@@ShyaMiss I agree. My dad has a 2018 5.3 silverado and I have a 2005 tahoe with the 5.3 and even though there is a power difference over the years you can definitely feel that gm let the engines run much less restricted back then. A simple minor tune would make it a whole different animal. Im sure its quite a bit different than the 6.2 though.

Nah

Eric Dolby Coyote!

That Ford is light gives it a big advantage

Nate Branham - some things never change like the fact that GM will always be behind Ford

I can't think of one example where GM was behind Ford. Guess it is subjective.

@@ericdolby1622 This video 🤔

Eric Dolby - where it counts Ford has the most racing heritage of any company in the world. It’s only second to Ferrari at wins in Formula 1. The legendary Ford DFV engine revolutionized formula one. The Ford Barra I6 from Australia that thing will go toe to toe with any JZ. The Coyote already ran a 5 second 1/4 mile and it came out 7 years ago. Faster than any ls on the planet ever. Not to mention sales Fords always been ahead. GM ALWYAS follow Ford the Mustang was the first then camaro and challenger. It’s easy to see who’s ahead when VW approached Ford to help them build a truck. Cause VW knows Ford owns the truck industry .