💯!!!!

Dumbledore of psychology

Why do you say he didn't get enough credit? He seems to come up very often, especially in psychology circles

Correct 👍

He crossed his mind ❤

While he certainly did respect his parents, he didn’t necessarily “listen to them” per se, as in being an obedient child. I’m sure he was obedient, but the path he took was far different than the one his father imagined for him. Jung’s father was a pastor, and if I remember correctly his father wanted Jung to do something similar. His father was also an academic, something Jung shared with him, and Jung remarked that his father died never actualizing who he was. Highly reccomend reading his auto biography, “memories dreams reflections”

@@jacobabarrera”Akchually” 🤓☝️

​@jacobbarrera1480 what's your point? He was one of the greatest psychoanalysts that the world has ever known, are you suggesting he should've been a pastor instead?

@@user-hs9go4vn3e Quite the opposite. I'm suggesting that being disobedient to the father or mother in this regard, if warranted, is precisely what may be required for personal development. In the Bible, Jesus mentions that one should cast away their father, their mother, or their family in general if they impede one's devotion to Christ (I would argue this is a psychological casting away, for in reality it's silly to completely abandon family and I actually believe the opposite is true; the day you start looking at your parents as people and not your parents is the day you can begin to foster a true relationship with them) There are many instances of a mother or father wanting their child to be a doctor or a lawyer, and then that child wastes their life to become said doctor or lawyer, but unconsciously they've always wanted to be an author or some other profession, and most likely would have been more successful doing that (in turn inadvertently winning the approval of the parents, for they prefer those sorts of jobs because they guarantee pay, although each individual case is different) I responded to the original comment like that because the OP instituted that Jung must have been a perfect little child who listened to his parents all the time, which isn't the case and goes against Jung's ideas in many ways. Of course, listening to your parents is important, especially in early childhood, but rebellion is a part of psychological development.

@@user-hs9go4vn3e he must ve read it "parents" instead of "patients"

that's the conscious which doesn't predict. watch the video again. what do people see in dreams ?

We will go back to our human self :D!

tell me your kid acts up without telling me

That is probably the result of a declining in affordable and morally reprehensible society. This lifestyle would give you the greatest chance of surviving a catastrophic event in a large country.

Any other books from him that you recommend?

Just subscribed to you! These are my people, at this link!!!

What made him write it?

​​@@Aadamfarooqrecommending you his book named "Man and his symbols"

I dreamt of rain, my children drowning, dogs soaked and skinny in swollen creeks before Katrina… stopped immediately after…

@@dianawitty9628wow!

😃👍

Cool but thats not what he meant.

Some of the adventure goes away, doesn't it? We're all strung out between strings of chaos and order... We need calming repetition/routines/rituals in an ever-changing world, but also unforeseen patterns to make things interesting. I wonder whether Jung would prefer classical music or jazz?

@@McVaerk no. it's not the adventure of it. it's the looking forward to certain disaster. People who see certain bliss coming don't mind it ;)

Just subscribed to you! These are my people, at this link!!!

"If you want to know the future look at the past."

Check out a book called "Planet Hurt" by Patrick curlyloxx Gaynor

Just subscribed to you! These are my people, at this link!!!

Ur Intp right

@@gertpostel1860 depends on the day. Mostly intj and intp though.

That largely based on our conditioning and education

I’m reminded of the experiments which demonstrated that decisions are made before the conscious mind is made aware of it.

@tydye7216awareness changes everything.

Yes, his books "Devils"

Wow

So have I but I'm very curious to know if he stayed with Tony wolf all his life?

He was a freemason and freemasonry = Satanism

Just subscribed to you! These are my people, at this link!!!

Whether or not you are a Christian there is definitely something. An old friend I had was not religious in the least bit. Raised by an alcoholic and in foster homes, he told me one time with a smile on his face about a dream he had that night "angels were singing it was bright and beautiful". Definitely wasn't acting his self. Well exactly a week later he drowned in a freak accident was riding his bike home from work on the canal path like he he did every night fell, knocked his self out and drowned. He had also called his mom for the first time in over two years and told he he loved her I guess. He was only 17.

Good point yes!

Hahaha

Obvious occurrences denied by the mass. Obvious history refuted by the mass. People may be "programmed" to simply be mechanical and thoughtless. Who knows? Ideologies are either confusing or make zero sense at all. Both are true.

I don't think it's funny at all

I agree…and I absolutely hate it.

You have dreams and unconscious visions of a coming apocalypse?

What was this from?

@@lucidityfps9638 "Modern Man in Search of a Soul"

Il l'a peut-être dit? Reconnaissant sa propre nature

Taking Drugs is not problem in America, it's Pride👍

wait...wait....wait,the problems are just around the corner 😂

People then called it the Great War. They didn't believe it could ever occur again. They were wrong - seen from a retrospective view. Jung was operating off of foresight, a much more impressive stance.

Right , people said it ww1 was the war that would end all wars. Blind optimism

Are you serious of did you said it ironically. In 1919 more than half of Europe and the Near East was still ravaged by war, civil unrest, bloody revolutions and famine. There was little reason for optimism if you weren't in the side of the victors. In truth it can be said that the First World War didn't really end until 1923. It is said that the five years after 1918 were bloodier that the foure years before.

When did the First World War Really End? When WW1 ended, Europe didn't return to peace, the five years following 1918 were deadlier than the 4 years of war. So says the British Imperial War Museum. So you didn't need to be a genius or a prophet to see the brewing storm on the horizon.

2024 collective soul is definitely projecting a bright future with love and only love it will change.

Good reason not to use Instagram . People who use it want to remain clueless

Fascinating. I think that many of the superhero themed movies, Harry Potter, Star Wars, etc. we’re depictions of myth/collective unconscious

​@@samcrowe8477 Heroes journey

U talking about the bug?

The evil clown is the nephilim. These people dress up like clowns to envoke the demonic energy behind it because that’s how the nephilim look in the spirit realm. The joker is a very dark demonic spirit that goes back to Atlantis and early civilization before the great flood.

Did he look like Trump?

we all do, his work is about to radically transform society or AI will take over for good. there are no other routes left for humanity.

Pervert?? Perverts are ALL today's gays and...

this is paraphrased but basically true. it's in Jung's autobiography. freud refused to tell Jung more info about his personal waking life because he didn't want to "give up [his] authority!"

Freud couldn't admit that he might be wrong. Sounds narcissistic to me.

Future doesn't exist.

Yup, he was awake while most were asleep

Sure...🙄

I believe you. I was shown it also

You should apply the theory of 12 archetypes of Carol Pearson in this since the symbolism present in the Tarot is statistically speaking very noisy and non deterministic.

That's an excellent question, and a very intriguing theory.

Genetics, a 1 in a million IQ

he is not... vain philosophizing is not smart.

@@heterodoxx5300 lmao, go to sleep

​@@heterodoxx5300well, objectively, he was quite intelligent. His IQ was quite high. As for his "vain philosophising", there's never been such a thing as a filosofia universale, a completely objective philosophy, so it's a pointless discretion

@@heterodoxx5300Of course he was smart in fact outstandingly intelligent man.What nonsense are you talking about.

it's simple history, a small war every 50 years, great war every 100, life threatening one every 500 years. With rise of technology, leisure, inequality it would accelerate this with the rising population, but if you decrease it it will simply delay it 10-20 years or even 50 years. That's all they need to kick the can to the next generation. Even depopulation proponents did the math, it only takes 1 generation to sacrifice themselves with 1-2 kids and it would reverse or stop over-population. But yea, overpopulation is a myth, it's only an idea perpetuated by western society of their ideal society.

Well, you were wrong, lol.

@@katashley1031 We were 100% right, and the moral and cultural disintegration continues, accelerating. America used to lead the world in science education, automobile production and wheat production etc., etc. Now it leads the world in teenage suicide, child sex exploitation, fetynal addiction, percentage of population incarcerated, high school dropout rate, yearly tonnage of human feces on city streets, mass murders per month and porn production. Your standards are low and you live in denial of reality--classic sociopathy(!): what could be more American! Good luck: you're going to need it because this is only the beginning!

Many people have that dream as a child. You couldn't run because you were asleep. Maybe you have arthritis in your knees. Many people do, nothing to do with Covid. Dreams are your mind working things out. Many Spanish people look like Arabs. Because they are..

Fraud??? You mean,,,,, Freud😅😅

Project much?

@@katashley1031 Which part? You could be right. Or did you mean all of them? 😂 I will amend my comment by changing "well-meaning charlatan" to "unintentional obscurantist," because I think that's more accurate. The other two I won't change because it is well documented that he actually did go mad (read his Red Book), and I also believe him to be a poet of sorts. My point was that he had a big heart and was a beautiful person who wanted to help people, but I have theoretical problems with him that limit his efficacy. I'll briefly explain. Jung believed the unconscious was a real thing: real yet mystical and largely unknown, loosely based in historical Archetypes. When a notion is that general, when it is not at any point made precise, you can always use it as the explanation for something. You see a guy having some problem, and you can just say, "well that was because of his unconscious." You say, "well of course he did that, it's because he's got too much of the Jester Archetype and not enough of the Lover." In the movies they call this kinda thing a deus ex machina 😅. But it's too general. It's just a horoscope with slightly more real-world accuracy since humans do indeed have patterns through history. Even if it makes some kind of sense it is still not precise enough or specific enough to the individual to sustainably help them. Like even if you say something useful like "you need to integrate your shadow more into your ego, because right now you have repressed rage." Even if that assesment is true, unless the person knows WHY they have repressed rage (specific childhood trauma, specific developmental difficulties, etc.), they won't be able to truly heal. That kind of thing can only happen with a lot of self-reflection coupled with therapy. But if you just say, "I guess believe Jung that integrating your Shadow is a good thing, just because I trust him," that will get you somewhere, but it won't get you far. Only you can do that. Now I have MANY criticisms of Lacan, not to mention he was a bastard in real life whereas Jung was beautiful, but Lacan is the first person to give a precise definition of what the unconscious is. For that and almost nothing else, I admire him. I won't be able to give you a summary of thousands of pages of literature, but Lacan's notion that _symbolic transference is effective because the unconscious is structured like a language_ is the key. For him the unconscious is not this nebulous thing like for Jung, rather it is what he calls "the Other," for which he gives a precise and clinically useful definition. To make a long story short (and less nuanced), the Other is basically just a person's particular, subjective understanding of what the social world wants from them, like what are the linguistic and social rules: what things you're allowed to say or do, what things you're not allowed to say or do, etc. The key here for Lacan is that the Other does not exist. YOU are this Other. It is YOUR belief that you are or aren't allowed to say or do X, Y, and Z. There is no Master figure out there (like Jung for instance) who can tell you the right way to live. Only you can figure that out after struggling through it yourself: what you want, why you feel it's impossible, why it might just not be, how can you make it possible, etc. A good way to understand why "the Other does not exist" is to read the 1-page short story by Kafka called "the Door to the Law." The Freudian way to talk about the Other and how it relates to Neurosis is through the tyranny of the superego, which is the "moral" or "ethical" part. And I have those in HEAVY quotes because a symptom only develops here due to one's patholgical notion of what is moral and ethical, when their speech is CONSTANTLY being censored by "the Other." It happens when a person is alienated. It happens when they aren't sure of their own intentions, which is a horribly painful place to be. It is doubting yourself at the most fundamental level. Freud and Lacan lived their whole life that way, particularly Lacan. Jung did not. And for that, he has my admiration and respect--even though I have theoretical problems with just how sure he is 😂 Hope that wasn't too long

If it's intuition, it's always correct. That's what makes it intuition.

thats a very wide discipline, I guess a part of it is true, but its more interested in organizing society in a more general sense

No one saw Hitler coming after WWI. Germany was crippled, weak.

nah, he was a professional liar and charlatan.

@@albertkirilov6921 Ex-Jungian psychologist. Now Christian after I discovered Jung worshipped demons.

⁠​⁠@tydye7216 Search about synchronicity and what Jung had to say about it. You'll be surprised.

Lol.. haven't seen anyone type " first" in years.. Makes me think of this KZfaq classic kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mc93YLuknNOmp4k.htmlsi=EEAEl90oAk-zThhH

Ok