Oh, that's what it was 😂

Thank you!

So living organisms danced into existence from the music? I see

@@agoogleuser2507 Well, according to Tolkien’s legendarium mythology, yes!

Didn't you watch a video? They do exactly what you written - evolve, reproduct, mutate. That was the whole poin of video.

@@user-ut4vl8bw2k I guess we have different definitions of those words

@@user-ut4vl8bw2k They're obviously talking about a more sophisticated simulation, one where organisms need energy to continue living. This is cool, but it doesn't feel as real as a simulation that would use simple rules as well as an energy system to watch organism grow, eat, metabolize, reproduce, and die.

Gödel, Escher, Bach

I’d love to understand how it works.

I think it will become something like "Matrix" in the future

I saw a game like that, it was about going from single to multicellular.

@@TheRepublicOfDixionconderoga another piece of the puzzle actually happened recently - check out "flow Lenia" if you have the time

Real life is not well-understood, but it is at least partially understood to the atomic level, both physically and chemically. A simulation where actual evolution occurs needs both physics and chemistry to have such dynamic behaviors, and an insane amount of particles and energy. You start with that primordial soup. Most of it becomes mundane clusters of matter and energy, like stars. Small pockets of matter, like planets, may by random chance have the exact conditions for evolution to take place. Gravity and relativity are important because you can’t simulate all of it at once; you subdivide the entire universe into “large” (yet such small) chunks so that the simulation of the universe is in fact only some form of a cellular automaton. Information cannot travel faster than the speed of light. Or, in terms of the CA, information is sent from one cell (chunk) to another, in a continuous, nonlinear way.

@@JordanMetroidManiac Lenia sort of simulates chemistry already. In a rudimentary way with not all relevant constraints presents, but effectively, it's quite similar to chemical reactions. There was an attempt to get a reaction diffusion version of Lenia (which is something you could achieve with real chemistry in a petridish) and it got pretty far. After a few modifications to the original version of Lenia into what's called *Asymptotic Lenia,* the issue ultimately turned out to be a nonphysical breaking of the mass equations. However, there is also another recent independent modification of Lenia called *Flow Lenia* which kind of solves the mass issue. I'm not sure whether that's enough to resolve the issues with the reaction diffusion attempt, but if it is, that ought to make it possible to, at least in principle, allow you to "run" Lenia in a literal real life petri dish given the right reaction chains. (It might be highly nontrivial to actually find suitable reagents though) As for the laws of physics, other than gravity, chemistry mostly already captures all physics you need for life. And if you are doing a 2D petridish style simulation you can basically neglect gravity. If you actually want a 3D sim that also involves gravity, that should be perfectly possible by simply adding an external force that always pulls stuff down. A full simulation would probably also amount to simulating Navier Stokes though, which is certainly gonna be much trickier.

That exactly what I was going to ask for do you have a link

Water also has a resistance to form a flat hex lattice like graphene. It's a 3 atom tetrahedron and can go antigravity in a nanutube bundle. Where's Leonard Suskind, dHooFT???.. can the sim work on a lattice sphere.. make a space time swimmer group that might use the curvurature suspected to be compactified

@@DamianHallbauer videos description has it

its not added manually. I'm sorry i can't give any explanation tough :)

Every particle emits a waveform with a frequency depending on its interaction "energy". Here is the code where I prototyped that effect colab.research.google.com/github/google-research/self-organising-systems/blob/master/notebooks/particle_lenia.ipynb#scrollTo=L9SckwekgO3U

In the article we discuss parallels with (Flow)-Lenia in detail google-research.github.io/self-organising-systems/particle-lenia/

Am i right or not pls tell me

wrong

I wonder about that too

google-research.github.io/self-organising-systems/particle-lenia/

Link in the description: google-research.github.io/self-organising-systems/particle-lenia/