Say you got an angle grinder ... what would it look like to remove stone ... just saying

There is no evidence the Sphinx was created earlier than 2600 BCE. You and none of your fans have no expertise in archaeology and therefore cannot "make up your own mind" with any authority or accuracy. All of your speculation and phony evidence fall into pseudoarcheology and pseudoscience. Yousef Aywan and his Khemitology have no standing in the scientific community. He is another fraud, like Graham Hancock, and like you.

I like your expression: Like boulders in the river of history.

perhaps, + mice problems with the tents. One of a kind box, u know, lol - barely mentioned in post #93 @ mah nstragram

The dating of the sphinx to 11,500 years is easily wrong. The "erosion" evident on the walls of the sphinx enclosure could easily have been a weakness present in the bedrock material when the enclosure was excavated. the presumption that bedrock is just magically wholly solid consistent material is total bologna and is an uneducated observation. that bedrock had billions of years of weather for water to drain through it and create fissures and weaknesses that would have been rapidly eroded if the sphinx was excavated 5000ya. the fact that the sphinx itself is so eroded is also evident that this bedrock material was low quality and inconsistent to begin with. likely why we don't see any other large bedrock features nearby sculpted into stuff. and Colin Reader's geological studies also indicate that there was similar water erosion present at the valley of the kings. this indicates that the rainy climate did not end abruptly in egypt. it tapered off over thousands of years, giving plenty of rain that can cause erosion to the sphinx after it was finished.

Imagine going to work with your tools when it's time to go home you gather tools and go home in this case home is in a orher planet and what they left behind they didn't need it

I'd love to hear what the mainstream explanation is for those long arching cut marks. It was clearly made by a very large circular saw.

So cant we cut a 1ft cube of the stone and simulate the speed of erosion with the arrange wind speed and sand particles collected by the winds, and do some maths?

the people that worked these stone megaliths did so because they could,and for them was not difficult,thats why you find similar sites worldwide.not done because it was hard,but done with relative ease

the peoples that iherited these enigmatic sights,are not the people that worked the stone thousands of years ago.but the egyptian qaukeademia dont want the truth to be out.

Wow, this is going to an enjoyable ride, amazing and very eyeopening. Civilisation, as I learned, the timeline of engineering and advanced tech... something happened, and we are the retrograde children of what we believe as we believe are modern times. Worldwide, something is not right, we should start questioning things we are taught in school regardless if it's wrong or right and not hide it.... to move on and to learn not to destroy.

Seriously. They used old eroded blocks. Even if it was a tomb or temple no one would used damaged block. You can't fix stupid. Great story

Wow Amazing, the power of God

Great Video! Please please make more walk-throughs. It reallly helps to get a better impression of the area. By the way, I spent some time in Peru making hundreds of fotos of knobs. Are you gonna bring content on that some time?

What intrigues me is why the high tech advanced human beings or X who did this work X years ago didn't leave some form of who they where in the work they completed so long ago! I believe the scoop marks were done in softened rock! My 2 cents!

The scoops are diamond drum grinders, prpbably multiple drums with hydraulic pressure pistons

Crazy this only has 200k views.

Watched the recent video on Danny Jones, I have to say man, be quite proud of yourself, quddos

I do believe that the trick is just water, sand, and a rock. That's all. Mix water and sand and you form an abrasive paste. Apply the rock in a sliding motion...for well...days....and you will make significant progress with the vast majority of the cuts that we're seeing.

can you check the balancing vase for level? when it is sitting on the bottom surface, the one you spun it on, can you check the top surface for parallel to the table top? :) and if possible, check how well it holds parallel while spinning.

To be clear, we do know that the population that existed in pre dynastic and old kingdom egypt were quite distinct genetically from the modern day egyptian population. However modern day egyptians are descended in part from ancient egyptian populations.

STOP this bull crap hypothesis nonsense re how they moved this, carved this when even an idiot realiszes there IS NO real answer!! Also STOP dismissing the TIME Period the CLIMATE, the GIANTS that existed NOT puny beings like NOW! When the major catastrophic event killed them off? The humans came back RESIZED! Probably the difference between a DINOSAUR and a small dog.. Atmostphere. climate, GIANTS !!! Advanced technology!! They'd be throwing some stones around like putting one in the basket.

Wow. Finally, someone speaking about things with some insight.

I appreciate hearing someone speaking some truth. Thank you

I have been reviewing the theories (yes, all of them) for years. Not one reasonable theory has been offered, that can’t be rejected as soon as the time needed is considered. It’s that simple.

The true details about the making and building of pyramids is either unknown or a carefully kept secret. Spend 5 minutes with a calculator and that becomes immediately obvious.

hey guys let's not forget many of these granite items are not pure and have several different types and hardness of stones and they finish these items with no errors

Absolutely amazing!

Obviously these stones were cut recently and put in there

It was all done with copper chisel....now sit down 😂😂😂😂😂

No civilization would take on such a massive project that takes decades to build, unless it would serve a purpose to leap mankind into a new era. Exactly like the power plant being built in France today, ITER. No one in their right mind would build such a massive fusion power plant, if it weren’t intended to create power, and advance mankind. There had to be some sort of government body who decided to build the pyramids. The amount of construction, planning and logistics involved was enormous. There is no way they decided to take this on, unless it would advance mankind somehow.

Ben I am a mechanical design engineer and I greatly enjoy watching your videos. My father was an engineer too, and he always used to tell me he didn't believe the archeologists pounding stone and copper chisel theory. For me the question which needs to be solved in order to prove or disprove Graham Hancock's theory of an archaic civilisation which taught multiple hunter gatherer cultures is the determination of the true date. As you will know, our date today is based on the birth of Jesus, who may or may not have existed, that is another question. And yet we see cultures around the world who seem to have structures which display common cyclopean features. More are being found in different locations every year, so for me this is not even an argument we need to have. The proof is there in carved stone. We also know that all the cultures of the world seem to display skill in astronomy, and all have their own calendars. The mayan long count dates back further than 3000BC, doesn't this correspond almost exactly with the high precision pre-dynastic vases you have already shown us, which Chris Dunn has analysed? The Jomon people of Japan were carving intricate Jade jewellery 40,000 years ago. It seems to me that hunter gatheres would have no reason to know the time of year beyond the season, and what the animals they followed were doing, and where they were headed next. If Graham is correct and an archaic civilisation poured out knowledge around the planet more or less simultaneously, then this is when the keeping of a real date will have begun. I fail to see how the romans would have counted the date backwards towards the birth of a person they didn't even know would be born, but who became so important that history reset the date for us all. If calendars around the world were started even within a thousand years of each other, I feel Graham would be vindicated. With all the art, and scrolls and tablets, that we have, does none of it make any reference to date. We have the logs of pyramid architects who logged the passing of every stone from quarry to site, but no one mentions what the egyptians thought the date was. I find this impossible, simply because if they kept a track of everything without knowing what day or year it was, except by lunar and solar cycles, then they were even clevered than we give them credit for. I would be interested to learn your thoughts, and even Graham Hancocks on this as it seems so simple. If a chinaman crossed the border to India and spoke with a person there, would they argue over what the date was? According to Graham Hancock, these different calendars should align roughly, if they were all started based on equinoxes and solstices. Of course, speaking different languages, these months might be differently named. Maybe they even had thirteen months each of four weeks... Damnit, I need to know!!! ;)

Has anyone therised this or even considered this could of been and this gonna sound bonkers butt a bath and the loop around would of been for servants during the time period

they had nuclear energy

It’s a temple, place of worship, of a tomb for micro sized pharoahs.

I look at the YD melting as the answer to what I saw through out Montana for 74 years.

Is there anything in Europe similar to the Slablands in the USA?

If I was ever thinking about taking on ursula spalies, I'd be lookin for a crowd.

Living here I haven't been damaged by society to the point that when I learned of the comet impact theory, it made way too much sense to me from what I've seen of Montana.

Thank you for this presentation - this is why I go to KZfaq for my entertainment and rabbit hole adventures. I enjoyed your straight up approach to this documentary and explanation of your explorations.

I've frequently fished a spot on the Musselshell river for smallmouth that I called 'the coal seam' hole for it's 4 inch wide black rock deposit. It's the black mat stuff I bet.

I've long supported Tony's concept of arial bombardment, after I saw Tunguska I'm feeling different. I think he's on to something. I like your presentation with George. Thanks.

My contact with history most of my live has made it's impression on me. I even found a t-rex in eastern Montana when I was under 30 but the introduction I got from you guys to the period of glacial melting caught me as readily as I caught trouts.

It's real. I've seen some museum pieces absolutely like these

At this point in time, with all of the different ancient artifacts, monuments, and structures marked by erosion, organic growth, obvious renovation attempts, and marks from precision machine tools, the history books need to be rewritten. Thinking about why edited/updated editions of our history books haven't been published is irksome. Here is an opportunity for the archaeologic, and historic, communities to redeem some esteem, while benefitting from all of the financial gains surrounding the presentation of new information. They won't have anything of the sort though. Instead, their academic societies perniciously cling to the ideas and conclusions of people who have long since passed. As they holdfast in their absolute resoluteness, their honor, prestige, and credibility has nearly entirely crumbled away. There's a reason for why the dinosaurs aren't still around today.

Would that vase break if it fell 1" and hit the table? I'd be more careful. I bet there are a LOT of broken vases that would provide just as good information?

Did you miss Göbekli Tepe, or..? it must have been a tsunami that buried these places..? Or? No-one will talk about that possibility and it seems that they stopped further digging..? Is it too obvious, maybe? Can you make video about that?

The faceted sections could have been made by using spacer blocks or jigs for sanding and pounding. You essentially add (for example) hardwood blocks joined together around the extrusion with a slot that only allows you to hit the stone on the exact spot that you want to be removed, leaving a flat surface to the exact point where the chisel cannot further penetrate because its constrained by the jig. For each facet, you would need a different jig, and multiple workers could work on a single facet on different spots, moving their jig around the piece as they go. THis would allow for fast and precise working, and later on the facets would be sanded by hand or with another jig.

On the box you can still see parts of the corner protections, the ones called 'edging' in the video. Square or round extrusions on 90-degree edges that were supposed to space ropes used to move the stone to prevent the corner edges from breaking off or having the ropes being cut, or cut grooves in the stone, and would either be finished with more detail or be removed on site. These techniques are also present in the queen's chamber, the unfinished chamber in the gisa pyramid.