Thank u

i agree or disagree

Great ❤and 🎉

I respect Fischer a lot, he was aloe against Soviet. But these 6:0 and especially 6.5: 2.5 are overrated, since one who start loosing has to try to win ad goes to big risk and that is why,

why didn't he took the rook on f1 (9:20)?

Keres was an extraordinarily talented attacking player in his youth, then later an all rounded strategic genius. Many top players fully expected him to become world champion after the war and were amazed how poorly he played against Botvinnik despite playing so well against his other rivals. Botvinnik was Russian and the Golden boy of the Soviet chess establishment, Keres was an Estonian. Was there similar dynamic going on to what occurred later between Karpov, the darling of the Soviet Chess politburo and the Azerbaijani, Kasparov.?

winning the US championship in a clean sweep of 11 games was no small achievement either. Fischer’s dad was a brilliant physicist, his mom, unfortunately, was a a loon who, if she was alive today would have probably been a climate cultist.

Honestly,the bishop pair is overrated. I think its an individual thing. Some people are better with Bishops and other with Knights.

No one but Fischer was able to beat the Soviet chess machine.

An incredible game! Capa was the truest genius of chess. Excellent video.

The Bf4, is called the Blackthorne variation.

This was a baller game by Capablanca

F6?!?!?

What a game! Thanks!

🙏🏽

If Fischer were alive and in his prime modern top GMs would beat him. He would probably be in 50th place in rating. That is pretty much just because the advancement of opening theory. If it were 960, or Fischer were given a couple of years to study modern theory with an engine and access to recent games and perhaps a coach or 2 things would be very different. He would be in the top 3, possibly even number 1. When Fischer hit his peak of 2785 which would be number 4 of current player ratings the number 2 ranked player was Spassky with a rating of 2660. That is 125 rating points beyond number 2 rating. That would be like if Magnus Carlsen was rated 2926 as Nakamura is 2801. That is how far beyond the competition Fischer was. The only other player in history with a similar lead was Paul Morphy. To get that far beyond 2nd place is a real accomplishment especially in a day and age when there were no computers. There were no engines to run lines against and look for weaknesses. Those guys didn't have a 3600 Engine to bounce ideas off of. They didn't have a 3600 Engine to look at their mistakes with and learn from.

🙏🏽

Thanks for this amazing game. Tal was one of my idols when I started playing chess. Can you please analyze a game by Max Euwe?

Chess dawg, do you think 49 year old Fischer would have been relevant in the 90s as a top chess player? Like, would he really have been competitive against the likes of a prime Kasparov, Karpov, ETC

🙏🏽

U gotta love how some of the smartest people playing one of the most competitive and difficult to master games in the world using all that brain power, and somehow they play there series as a best of 10???? What in the world kind of monkey business is this?

Thanks for sharing this important game. It might just be me but, it seemed like ChessDawg was a little tired or under the weather this time. Did I mind? Not a-Tal !! One question: At 14:13 where Tal is starting to try for a perpetual, why does he need to push the pawn first (a4)? Why can't he just start by checking: Qa8?

Mr. Dawg, although the 1992 Fischer vs Spasky was a masterpiece, Fischer’s complicated Calculated queen sac immortal game at only 13 years of age vs IM Byrne was a gem that everyone remembers.

Not the all time best but close.

Fischer gave up his crown approximately 1 year after winning the title of world champion. It took Magnus Carlsen 10 years to make the same decision. Think about that!

A really instructive game.

Great Video, Dawg. Thank you. The "REAL" championship was a beautiful game. very evident how much more godlike BF was in 1992. LEGEND

Thank you

Great Thank you

Your channel is great, and I agree with you about Bobby being an amazing player. When controlling for resources available in each era and considering accomplishments, I think he was the greatest ever...and even if you don't take era into account, he still is probably the best ever. I admire excellent players, but I honestly feel most of these current young "phenoms" are explainable mainly with the internet and their very age that makes them appear super gifted---24/7 internet games available, powerful chess machines for analysis and the most current lines/developments, KZfaq channels, Chessable/other courses, grandmaster teachers around the world available for Zoom/Skype hire, parents that got them into it super young and quite possibly are even relatively affluent in being able to promote their chess learning, and doing all this at an age when they basically have no other (or very few) responsibilities and can easily devote 3-5 hours daily (and in the summers, perhaps 8-10) from age 5-12 or even, starting at 8, then age 8-14, even this latter one would mean (with only 3 hours a day devoted to chess) approximately 6,570 hours (or the equivalent of just over 3 full years of 40-hour "work weeks" treating chess as a job). Fischer did it ALL on his own, with few books, and without computers/internet, and he grew up poor in a small apartment with a single, hardworking mom who often left him alone or in the care of his older sister--who was the person that bought him his first chess set. He put the US on the map and launched a US chess explosion and without any US support--and during a time when most of the US people and government didn't care at all about chess (as opposed to the enormous, dominating Soviet chess machine). What the US government did to him in so many awful ways just because he "violated" their ridiculous Yugoslavia sanctions--especially given our government's ridiculous interactions, AND sometimes lack thereof, in far more serious geopolitical events was immoral and should have been criminal. (He was treated FAR worse in every way AND declared a criminal, but it reminds me a bit of when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan in 1979, and President Carter responded by pulling the US out of the 1984 Summer Olympics in Moscow, screwing over all those individuals and their families who had sacrificed so much in money, pain, and hours/years for perhaps that ONE shot at a medal, perhaps at the prime time of their lives...and for what benefit?!) Had I been President, I'd have awarded Fischer the Medal of Freedom and also Kennedy Center Honors for his amazing accomplishments and artistry. Some decent President should still award him those posthumously. He was a national hero and treasure. I'm glad that the Icelanders were kind to him and honored him with citizenship during all the horrible treatment by the US, allowing him to live out his life in peace in a beautiful country with wonderful people who appreciated him.

chess before this stupid computer shit was so much cooler. nowadays if u play online there are so many cheaters thats fucking stupid.

무한차원 체스의 모든 해가 궁금해요.

*In Magnus carlsen voice* At 11:22 it’s not Nbd2 but just Nd2 because the other knight is pinned and only one knight can go there.

If Fischer grew up in Carlsen's era who is the better player? If one person could challenge Carlsen it had to be Fischer...(Sorry Kasparov)

Great Analysis... the Spassky game in 92 makes the Byrne game look sophomoric... Fischer was the real deal in chess throughout his lifetime!

Kasparov stated that Ficher played at about a 2600 level.

lol… what a silly question😂 Fischer would destroy everyone and perhaps only a few hand of GMs of our present date could give him a run for his money. Fischer wasn’t just a strong player. He was obsessed to crush his opponents. Nowadays with strong engines and internet with loads of database. He would be unstoppable.

great vid, comparison.. thx

Absolutely amazing games but i really like the first one it's very thrilling to watch.

Beautiful game seems Fischer improved over the years, amazing. In a postion where any move is good he must have been a beast at blitz

Excellent video. Thank you.

wow i cant beleive i saw the move before you announced it :D

I think they did a computer analysis of all his games from 1965 to 1973 and his accuracy was crazy like 95% or something. He was the human computer back then.

He wasn't really fighting the players in chess ...he was fighting his own emotional issues. Had that been controlled or neutralized who knows what he would accomplish?

Great « combo » games ; much appreciate because of your explanations!

I have analyzed the second game with stockfish 30 moves ahead. Accuracy Fischer=92,3 and Spassky=89,0. No blunders from any player. Spassky made one genius move 47 Nxe4 Be7!!, but he was already -5,25 at that time...

Byrne let the kid finish his masterpiece. Classy guy.

This chess genius in Bobby Fischer, was the only reason to why I loved the game of chess. I was only 8 yrs old when Bobby became the world champion. From then on, I began to learn to play this chess game and followed Bobby's career until his self reclusion... Until his death, I dearly loved and adored him... He will forever be my greatest chess genius of all time.... Rest in eternal peace, my dear Bobby Fischer♥️🙏🙏🙏

Kasparov claimed Fischer would not be able to beat any modern chess player in 1992 and that he is around 2600.

How would a prime Magnus match up against a prime Bobby?