Calm down lol

well he is definitely sportsmanlike over all but he once made a misogynist comment during US open

You should be careful how you phrase things you know nothing about. I didn't get the idea from that channel, which I've never heard about. I just checked, the videos from that channel has 7 000 and 6 000 views. You're kidding right, automatically assuming I watched them? If you want to know - you could have asked - I got the inspiration from a fellow KZfaq friend of mine called WivoRN Productions who had a series of Federer among the lines of "Federer Casually Handling Big Servers". The part about 10 minutes and brilliance I thought out myself. Is that explanation enough or should I be investigated more? I've had videos and content directly stolen from my channel countless times and I know how frustrating it is, so no, I don't go around and try to steal or copy exact things from others, no matter how certain you are that I'm one of 7 000 viewers (lol).

First of all I will phrase however I see fit, I am speaking truth. What are you going to do, have my comment removed, fine, run from truth. Secondly there are many videos that say "Casual" - a common word in the english language - search "Sampras cool, casual..." where he's compared to DiMaggio. Then you added the word "brilliance" The "Casual Brilliance" is something he put together, and I know where the phrase "Casual Brilliance", cause he told me feom whom and I also know where. And it's also ironic, and by that I mean suspect that you're Federer Casual Brilliance vida only came up after his Sampras Casual Brilliance. And I didn't say stole his video, but from everything that is apparent it sure looks likenyou jacked his title, idea and theme.

@@johnblaze8808 What I'm going to do? Well, I just responded earlier and wrote the reason why I made this video. It has nothing to do with the Sampras videos (which I hadn't even watched) but I understand that no matter what I say, you've already made up your mind. So what do you really want to discuss? Pour your hate out on my because you "just know" you are right? I have no intention of wasting my time on rude persons like you and I have no trouble keeping these messages online for everyone to see. I have nothing to be ashamed about when it comes to this video. Again, I've had videos, titles and content stolen time and time again and it's not something I'm wanting to do against someone else because I know the feeling. But of course, you "speak the truth" and know what went through my mind when I decided to make this video. Here's the video I got inspired by: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/id2An9GcxMeUlJc.html&ab_channel=WivoRNProductions And yeah, if you don't want to come across as a Mr Know-It-All and a complete jerk by accusing people of things and when you are not one bit interested of what the other person has to say, then yes, go ahead and phrase your opening message like that. This is my last message responding to your accusations.

What do I want you to do? I could careless, but let's look at the facts. You said you got "casual" from that video and "brilliance" yourself, and decided to put them together... really? It's not a common phrase, and actually it's a specific phrase from someone and that's where that poster got it from. He admitted so and paid homage unlike yourself. That video is over a year old and yours is a month, and a Fed fan like yourself only saw that video a month ago... please. "We don't believe you, you need more people" -Jay-Z "Takeover" And as far has "hate pouring" I'm not the one commenting on the # of veiws of other vids. And by the way if you think the # veiws you get is attributable to you... it's not. You're not doing anything special. Fed videos will gain a lot of views due to the size of his fan base, which includes fanboys like yourself, not because of you. I can put a vid of naked woman on youtube and get a lot of veiws, and guess what? They wouldn't be watching for me. If you were doing anything special, you would be able to be more original.

You should be careful how you phrase things you know nothing about. I didn't get the idea from that channel, which I've never heard about. I just checked, the videos from that channel has 7 000 and 6 000 views. You're kidding right, automatically assuming I watched them? If you want to know - you could have asked - I got the inspiration from a fellow KZfaq friend of mine called WivoRN Productions who had a series of Federer among the lines of "Federer Casually Handling Big Servers". The part about 10 minutes and brilliance I thought out myself. Is that explanation enough or should I be investigated more? I've had videos and content directly stolen from my channel countless times and I know how frustrating it is, so no, I don't go around and try to steal or copy exact things from others, no matter how certain you are that I'm one of 7 000 viewers (lol).

First of all I will phrase however I see fit, I am speaking truth. What are you going to do, have my comment removed, fine, run from truth. Secondly there are many videos that say "Casual" - a common word in the english language - search "Sampras cool, casual..." where he's compared to DiMaggio. Then you added the word "brilliance" The "Casual Brilliance" is something he put together, and I know where the phrase "Casual Brilliance", cause he told me feom whom and I also know where. And it's also ironic, and by that I mean suspect that you're Federer Casual Brilliance vida only came up after his Sampras Casual Brilliance. And I didn't say stole his video, but from everything that is apparent it sure looks likenyou jacked his title, idea and theme.

@@johnblaze8808 What I'm going to do? Well, I just responded earlier and wrote the reason why I made this video. It has nothing to do with the Sampras videos (which I hadn't even watched) but I understand that no matter what I say, you've already made up your mind. So what do you really want to discuss? Pour your hate out on my because you "just know" you are right? I have no intention of wasting my time on rude persons like you and I have no trouble keeping these messages online for everyone to see. I have nothing to be ashamed about when it comes to this video. Again, I've had videos, titles and content stolen time and time again and it's not something I'm wanting to do against someone else because I know the feeling. But of course, you "speak the truth" and know what went through my mind when I decided to make this video. Here's the video I got inspired by: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/id2An9GcxMeUlJc.html&ab_channel=WivoRNProductions And yeah, if you don't want to come across as a Mr Know-It-All and a complete jerk by accusing people of things and when you are not one bit interested of what the other person has to say, then yes, go ahead and phrase your opening message like that. This is my last message responding to your accusations.

What do I want you to do? I could careless, but let's look at the facts. You said you got "casual" from that video and "brilliance" yourself, and decided to put them together... really? It's not a common phrase, and actually it's a specific phrase from someone and that's where that poster got it from. He admitted so and paid homage unlike yourself. That video is over a year old and yours is a month, and a Fed fan like yourself only saw that video a month ago... please. "We don't believe you, you need more people" -Jay-Z "Takeover" And as far has "hate pouring" I'm not the one commenting on the # of veiws of other vids. And by the way if you think the # veiws you get is attributable to you... it's not. You're not doing anything special. Fed videos will gain a lot of views due to the size of his fan base, which includes fanboys like yourself, not because of you. I can put a vid of naked woman on youtube and get a lot of veiws, and guess what? They wouldn't be watching for me. If you were doing anything special, you would be able to be more original.

Put Stan, Delpo definitely in front of Ferrer

@@danielkarpinsky9721easily

I still think Roger is number 1 in 2017. Rafa had additional points from clay which Roger didnt.

So annoying what happened to him that summer during the NA HC swing. YE not as much of a biggie as the lost opportunity to win USO and get the record.

@@mantaishere He was very unlucky for the past 10 years or so, that one stupid virus in 2008 took away his rhythm. Still manages to cause problems on Rafa and Novak, its good enough already.

@@earl8295 Not sure you can have 10 years' worth of misfortune, but certainly unlucky for some periods along the way post-2012 for the most part, I'd say.

@@mantaishere i agree that was worse. Having played healthy at the level of AO or WB he would have definitely won the USO and that would mean another slam there after so many years, 3 in the same year, etc Huge opportunity missed.