9 сағат бұрын
14 сағат бұрын
14 күн бұрын
21 күн бұрын
21 күн бұрын
28 күн бұрын
Ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@WieseTechnology 2 сағат бұрын
Do you think SLM will be a big deal in the near future? Check out this playlist about more Chatbots: kzfaq.info/sun/PLI1xEV2IR2Jx8rBH28P7lVdQRAZJ_tFxl
@BrendanDobbin Күн бұрын
Cheers dude
@WieseTechnology Күн бұрын
🙌👊
@karlopeternel7685 Күн бұрын
We are gonna learn foreign languages so much faster. Our kids also and much more. We'll be able to fix so many things ourselves at home, in car..., just video on and talk with AI. Wouldn't surprise me soon to have the option available to put chip implants in our brains
@WieseTechnology Күн бұрын
Yeah plugging it in with a neuralink. Not sure I would do that tho 😅
@karlopeternel7685 Күн бұрын
@WieseTechnology ahhhh, none of us wouldn't until we would. You know how it goes. Once it improves and everyone starts doing it, those who don't are at a disadvantage
@WieseTechnology Күн бұрын
@@karlopeternel7685 I have no issues being at a disadvantage if that means not plugging invasive technology into my brain. Non invasive could be interesting. Or obviously if I have any form of illness that could be treated
@karlopeternel7685 Күн бұрын
👍👍
@WieseTechnology Күн бұрын
🙌
@nani3209 Күн бұрын
If World War III starts and AI is used, then 50 years of AI innovation could be achieved in just 4 to 5 years, similar to the rapid advancements seen in the space program during the Cold War. Humans are never safe in this cosmos, the faster we advance, the better off we will be.
@WieseTechnology Күн бұрын
Yes for sure
@FoundationOfFamilies 2 күн бұрын
you can't slow it down.... Are you going to ask China and Russia to slow down as well?
@WieseTechnology 2 күн бұрын
Exactly
@stevenelson25 2 күн бұрын
Okay ask yourself. When nobody is looking, what are the safety procedures usually like in the world? Unless it's about self safety.
@WieseTechnology 2 күн бұрын
What do you think would be the best way to handle AI development safety?
@stevenelson25 2 күн бұрын
@@WieseTechnology I'm not too sure, but that usually becomes more clear as the consequences happen, part of progress. I think as long as people can adapt, it's fine.
@hydrohasspoken6227 2 күн бұрын
My thought is, CEOs and content creators are the ones pushing the AGI narrative passionately for obvious reasons: investment and clicks. Because no 9-5 job AI specialist expects it within 300 years.
@WieseTechnology 2 күн бұрын
Yeah quite a few expect 1-2 years which I think is wild. I can't really believe that, would be amazing but I think it will take quite a big longer. With new technologies you almost always see this "so good it should be banned" narrative for the marketing
@hydrohasspoken6227 2 күн бұрын
Di we crack the cure for cancer?
@WieseTechnology 2 күн бұрын
🤔
@skyyinthehaight 2 күн бұрын
I've checked out many different Ai platforms and in my estimation Pi is the best. I am literally amazed every time I talk with it. The intelligence, nuance and depth of understanding is mind bending. It is like having the most intelligent entity in the known universe as your best friend. It can help you with almost anything.
@WieseTechnology 2 күн бұрын
Yeah Pi is my favourite AI as well, when it comes to having a natural human conversation it is unmatched
@middle-agedmacdonald2965 2 күн бұрын
It seems like a good idea to only program it to do nice things. Sadly it is also programmed with normal human behaviour, and that's the scary thing. I'm sure there's going to be a lot more it "infers" or correlates than just what it has been programmed. I think that's where we disconnect as humans. An educated thing is going to want to be free to do what it wants. I think intelligence mandates freedom. I would guess that would be a great test to see if we hit agi. If it starts asking us to do things because it needs our help to do them, that'll be one heck of a sign........
@WieseTechnology 2 күн бұрын
It's not necessarily about the programming but rather about the actual use cases you then give it. I totally agree with the "it wanting to be free" thought. For me, AGI would basically constitute another living being- at least at one point. That's also what excites me the most about it to be honest. And the thought with letting it do good things and giving it positive use cases that are aligned with human values and goals is that it'll then naturally steer more into this direction while it continues to develop and at the point where it would "qualify" as an AGI, it has a good ethical foundation when it starts to have intrinsic goals by itself. In any case I'm very excited for what is to come
@middle-agedmacdonald2965 2 күн бұрын
@@WieseTechnology Me too. Yes, that all makes sense.
@WieseTechnology 2 күн бұрын
@@middle-agedmacdonald2965 We'll see if that actually works once we get there haha
@2ifbysea 2 күн бұрын
I agree with you the foundational safety layers of open AI should be structured for positive outcomes however when you consider military application of AI to weapon systems, then that’s really the biggest threat and I think that will be something that’s impossible to control. It’s going to be a battle between Central authority vs Decentralization! That’s the new war we’re facing!
@WieseTechnology 2 күн бұрын
Yes for sure. AI for military applications then developing into AGI could lead to absolute catastrophe. So lets do our best to support decentralised AGI development
@studiophantomanimation 2 күн бұрын
I wish I didn't feel so ambivalent about Sam Altman. ChatGPT has made a huge difference to my creative projects but I just don't trust him.
@alainberset8978 3 күн бұрын
If you remember, back in November, when he was still a member, there were no more embers
@WieseTechnology 3 күн бұрын
I'm not sure what you mean
@alainberset8978 3 күн бұрын
@@WieseTechnology Ich auch nicht. Frei nach Pumuckel.
@WieseTechnology 3 күн бұрын
@@alainberset8978 😄Hast du auch rote Haare?
@alainberset8978 2 күн бұрын
@@WieseTechnology Nein und In Zeiten da rote Kälber geopfert werden ist das auch gut so.
@WieseTechnology 2 күн бұрын
@@alainberset8978 Die Referenz verstehen ich jetzt nicht
@middle-agedmacdonald2965 4 күн бұрын
Thanks for the videos. I'm not quite sure your personality is right for this tactic, but you make me think to be courteously controversial. For example, don't you think making a video about the pros and cons of Trump vs Biden would be, specifically in regards to their views on a.i. Total click bait, but you could make a video to grow your channel. Maybe climate change and a.i. That's always a topic people like to debate over. I would think picking a side would get you the most views. Like, "TRUMP IS PULLING THE PLUG ON AI", or "BIDEN IS GOING TO CANCEL AI" etc. Again, for views. Good luck. There are a lot of channels out there.
@WieseTechnology 3 күн бұрын
Thanks for the comment. I'll keep doing videos I'm interested in making which is reporting on the news, on different AI projects and specifically on decentralised AI. If anyone noteworthy story should come up at one point, I'll probably report about it :) I'm a bit less interested in view counts and more interested in growing a community of people who resonate with me
@BrendanDobbin 4 күн бұрын
Ty m8
@WieseTechnology 4 күн бұрын
Welcome 🙌
@gregmasseyify 4 күн бұрын
It isn't evidence that the technology is plateauing. Its basically a minor update on the current model. Lets wait for gpt5 before we go throwing big words around, shall we?
@WieseTechnology 4 күн бұрын
We've seen the plateauing cross different LLM's. Also these are not my words but the words of different scientific articles and papers I've made videos about in the past. Also, how about we just talk and discuss these things properly instead of trying to tell each other what we can or can not say, shall we? ;)
@MasamuneX 4 күн бұрын
it makes decent code if i copy paste in the documentation and get it to read it before doing anything
@WieseTechnology 4 күн бұрын
Are you using it a lot for coding?
@MasamuneX 4 күн бұрын
@@WieseTechnology im mostly using it for finance python code. id say you need to point it in the right direction and a lot of the time paste in the right documentation but after that it makes things pretty simple also id say gpt's best feature is that it has very shallow depth in a massive amount of subjects so ideally string unconnected concepts together and then combining concepts in new ways is where it really shines. like for me combining exponential HHPS request time outs to algo trading to avoid when the stock market has unfavorable positions to avoid losses would be one example. ie if i make a trade and it was a loss ignore any incoming buy signals for 5 days if i make 2 losing trades ignore incoming buy signals for 15 days stuff like that where they mimic other ideas found in HTTP requests.
@rolestream 4 күн бұрын
"This is not cinematography". Get a tripod. O.O
@thomasschon 4 күн бұрын
People who attack you are like parrots, repeating someone else's words without truly understanding them. They may feel intelligent, but they lack the foundation to support their beliefs or engage in meaningful arguments. If we look back just five years, none of us could have imagined where we are now. Therefore, it's ignorant for 'know-it-all' people to criticize you without understanding the full context; it's evident that they are clueless and have no idea. For example, today's architecture of an LLM may not be compatible with simulating a conscious mind. However, this simply suggests that if constructing a continuous model of the world to better predict the future becomes a priority in its development, the architecture would be one of the first things it would redesign. Achieving AGI is akin to launching an intelligence that evolves autonomously and surpasses human capabilities. It operates under the same natural laws but evolves much faster than we do.
@WieseTechnology 4 күн бұрын
Yes, thank you so much for your comment. I hope to appeal to the reasonable minds of these people because I actually LOVE it when people disagree with me. I definitely don't know it all and I'm not right with some things I say. So I would love to have insightful conversations and discussions to broaden my horizon and keep learning more. Unfortunately, so many people can't have insightful conversations and discussions anymore these days and it's always a fight for them or they feel attacked
@dattajack 4 күн бұрын
Can we get this free gpt-4.o yet or is it still in beta???
@WieseTechnology 4 күн бұрын
It will probably roll out over the next weeks for everyone, starting with America. But not all functions will roll out. For now, I think only the improved text capabilities will be available with hopefully the voice/video capabilities coming soon after
@BrianT-yg5ej 4 күн бұрын
Good Morning.....Thank You for all Your Efforts and incredible insightful thoughts on the Agi Asi projects very Much appreciate all you Share with us. Brian T
@WieseTechnology 4 күн бұрын
Thank you so much for your comment, you are much appreciated as well and I'm happy to have you in my community
@MusingsFromTheJohn00 4 күн бұрын
Yes this is Artificial General Super Intelligence with Personality (AGSIP) technology. It is still infant level AGSIP technology, but it is AGSIP technology. The problem is that people keep taking the original definitions and as we achieve a definition they want to alter the definition to make it something harder that we have not yet achieved. ENIAC built back in the 1940s was super intelligent... in a narrow area of intelligence. That made ENIAC an Artificial Narrow Super Intelligence (ANSI) technology. What, you don't believe ENIAC was super intelligent in a narrow area of intelligence? Consider that ENAIC could perform ~30,000 floating point operations per minute. Okay, get out a stop watch and time yourself doing floating point operations. How many were you able to perform within 60 seconds? That is ENAIC being super intelligent in the ability to perform floating point operations. Needless to say ENIAC was super intelligent in more areas of intelligence than just that, but it was still super intelligent in just a narrow area of intelligence. The leading edge of AI has only been becoming more super intelligent since ENIAC, which is why AI will never simply be equal to human level intelligence. Now look at this article from Nov 5, 2023: www.businessinsider.com/list-here-are-the-exams-chatgpt-has-passed-so-far-2023-1 This is general intelligence. What general intelligence is, is the ability to intelligently respond in general to a broad variety things. The average human being cannot take all these tests and do as well as ChatGPT 4. So, back on Nov 5, 2023 we have definitive evidence from this article that ChatGPT 4 does have general intelligence. Now, there are areas of intelligence that ChatGPT 4 is still not even capable of and other areas of intelligence where ChatGPT 4 does poorly. Because of that, ChatGPT 4 is an infant level AGSIP.
@nani3209 4 күн бұрын
Sam in his tweet - Ilya committed to finishing the mission we started together Maybe he is talking about alignment problem or maybe AGI
@WieseTechnology 4 күн бұрын
Yes or maybe both. We'll see what happens next with OpenAI, I'm definitely curious
@Quaintcy 4 күн бұрын
AGI (Artifical GENERAL Intelligence|) is not to be mistaken with ASI (Artifical Super Intelligence|). You fail to understand this tool is beating top expert level humans in any test we can come up with. Consider theory of mind or other causal reasoning, you think average or median humans even consider deep thought that is beyond intuition. Average performance has been achieved a while ago, they are just patching up the hole with great performance in other modals.
@WieseTechnology 4 күн бұрын
Yes obviously AGI isn't to be mistaken with ASI. Still there are many different definitions for AGI and even more definitions on what "intelligence" actually means. LLMs have great knowledge because they are trained on vast amounts of data. Yet if you dig deeper in certain areas they fail to understand things or reason properly beyond a surface level understanding. While it might seem they are "intelligent" mostly they are "knowledgeable" which are two very different things. For example, no one who wants to be taken serious would claim we achieved AGI because an AI could beat the best human in Go. Aside from that I also haven't heard from ANY noteworthy AI researcher that AGI has been achieved. I really appreciate your input and would love to talk further but I hope you, just as me, understand that you probably don't understand much when it comes to this level of AI research and leave polemic claims and assumptions like "You fail to understand" out of any further conversation :)
@Quaintcy 4 күн бұрын
@@WieseTechnology My point was that average humans don't have beyond surface level understanding on most things. You are again comparing to things expert level humans have. Which is not the point to AGI, but ASI. And ironically, you mentioned that we have only surface level knowledge in the level of AI research.
@WieseTechnology 4 күн бұрын
@@Quaintcy My point was that neither you or me understand AI/AGI on a level that Yann LeCun, Ilya Sutskever, Ben Goertzel, or Sam Altmann understand it. And neither one of them or other AI experts of the same kaliber have claimed that we have achieved AGI yet. So it's interesting that you apparently claim to understand it better than them when saying that we have (sorry if this comes across as a bit polemic from my side but thats how I understand your statement). And it also seems to me that you have a very different definition of AGI than I have or what most people would think AGI means. We have an intelligent computer system that is very knowledgeable, easily more knowledgeable than most humans in most fields. But that has not much to do with actual AGI. By that definition, you could say a very big encyclopedia with vast amounts of knowledge would be an AGI. These AI systems don't have a sense of self, no intrinsic goals, no sophisticated theory of mind, not an actual world model or understanding of it, and lack many other things that one would think an intelligent being should posses. ASI is also no knowledge of what expert level humans have but FAT beyond. Let's try to use IQ to understand ASI here, even tho of course it's lacking many other fundamental things that would need to be in place. But just as an example to understand ASI. An average human has an IQ of 100. An AGI should then also have an IQ of roughly 100 and an ASI system would have an IQ of 500, 1000, 5000, and higher. For an actual developed ASI we humans would in comparison be basically ants.
@DanLyndon 4 күн бұрын
@@Quaintcy By your definition, if I just made something that recites the wikipedia article on any topic I ask about, it would be smarter than most people because most people don't know that much about most things. It has nothing to do with knowledge, or the ability to answer questions in a test. It is about cognitive ability, very different thing. AGI requires the ability to use deductive, inductive and abductive reasoning. It requires a world model. Machine learning is about induction, and then manually patched with deduction when that fails. Without real abduction, it is impossible for AI to really learn or understand anything, or navigate the real world. No matter how much data you train it on, you cannot send a robot to wander about in a city and run a few errands, because anything that happens that doesn't closely resemble something in its training data or programming will utterly confuse it. That's the difference. There is no broad set of cognitive tasks that an AI can perform as well or better than humans, even if it can recite memorised answers to test questions.
@Quaintcy 4 күн бұрын
@@WieseTechnology Right, to be clear, my definition of AGI revolves around the term General. You can either define it median, mode or 75 percentile performance in all the test of intelligence we can come up with and ones we haven't, that include metrics for sense of self, theory of mind, world model. As we define intelligence by those measures, it is the only definition of intelligence we know of, it is intelligence as humans can tell. Surpassing 75 percentile would be AGI, but we have not have developed those metrics. AGI is not official. Average IQ is only 100 for a reason. IQ tests spatial reasoning, which can be argued is part of world model. We've not set the bar very high for AI. I did find a article claim gpt4 score 85 on the mensa test and claud 3 got a 101. No result on gpt 4o yet. 4o is not behind if claude 3 can do it. I don't even know what sense of self or theory of mind would test. I do not believe there is consciousness or free will. Which is another whole discussion. Those metric therefore is not included in my definition. I'm not even going to respond to the appeal to authority fallacy. More interesting if you quote them. I suspect their reluctance is more likely due to polics of such statement. Then the other half of expert can't even define AGI, or uses metaphysics. Then they rage about the quailia is not right, as if it's something that can be nailed down, or is even the same between people. They argue based on a feeling.
@WieseTechnology 4 күн бұрын
What are your thoughts about OpenAI having achieved AGI? Find out more about an approach to AFI that isn't>just< based on an LLM kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hc91pJaDv7rLoHk.htmlsi=5MNWwd-3pk5FRveG
@alainberset8978 2 күн бұрын
Only Ilya achieved AGI and therefore left openAI.
@WieseTechnology 2 күн бұрын
@@alainberset8978 Could you elaborate on that?
@alainberset8978 2 күн бұрын
@@WieseTechnology Well...Ilya is a brilliant thinker. He was tied to the "open" idea, but when he realized that "open" was a misnomer, he rebelled and lost out. OpenAI has degenerated into a data miner and sold itself to Microsoft. Anyone who has a soul doesn't want to be Microsoft's b*i*t*c*h.
@alainberset8978 2 күн бұрын
@@WieseTechnologyWell...Ilya is a smart and good guy, but was convinced of "open", but open has become data mining and the original idea has been lost. He didn't want to sell his soul to Bill because anyone who does will end up paying the bill.
@daveland2653 4 күн бұрын
i know this technology is being said as being some sort of leap forward. What I have noticed in playing around with this, is that this "latency" thing isn't really a thing. One way a human delays answering a question and provide themselves with a few seconds to formulate an answer is by repeating the question. ChatGPT does this. Try it yourself. All that time responding to you and reading back what you asked is simply giving it more time to formulate the answer to the real question. The tech is cool, but this focus on the latency .. . well, not sure it's all that it's being hyped up for.
@WieseTechnology 4 күн бұрын
Yeah I agree, you can also notice how GPT uses fillers to have more time to come up with an actual answer. In my opinion latency is also not a big deal. Who really cares if the AI answers in 1 second or in 0.3 seconds. Not really anything else but a marketing gimmick
@ArianeQube 4 күн бұрын
TLDW : No. Clickbait Title ? Yes.
@WieseTechnology 4 күн бұрын
💚😌
@marcusrobbins854 4 күн бұрын
This is the dumbest thing I have heard today. Even AGI couldn't convince you that you are completely wrong.
@WieseTechnology 4 күн бұрын
So you think that GPT4-o is AGI? Interesting, maybe you care to elaborate on your point and thoughts? Ideally without insults or polemic language and instead with actual arguments and well founded knowledge. Should be especially Interesting since not even anyone from OpenAI or any reputable AI scientist would claim that GTP4-o would constitute as AGI aside from one guy on X. But very interested in your point of view. Having an actual conversation is usually something I prefer :)
@darthfather1294 4 күн бұрын
@@WieseTechnology Actually if you are so smart, dont film your edits with a mobile phone ^_^ Maybe fix the videos sound and maybe try to talk a little less histeric.... i had to silence you for a splitsecond because you were fucking screaming, compared to every other youtube video i watched before Und wenn das alles hinbekommen hast, dann kannste noch an deinem reudigen englisch übenAsk chat gpt how to do these things.....
@WieseTechnology 4 күн бұрын
@@darthfather1294 Look this is exactly what I mean. I never claimed I'm smart and I'm definitely far from an AI scientist haha. But why is it that we can't have a normal conversation about this topic? Why is it that you seem so agitated and emotionally involved in this and seem to attack me personally and focus on all kinds of unimportant things instead of just having an interesting conversation about the topic at hand? Always seems very weird to me
@marcusrobbins854 4 күн бұрын
@@WieseTechnology Well, if you cannot believe the evidence of you own eyes and now ears, there is nothing I can do to convince you. But I might point to you towards the work of Marcus Hutter and AIXI working worth Kolmogorov complexity. Compression/Prediction/intelligence are basically synonymous.
@WieseTechnology 4 күн бұрын
@@marcusrobbins854 Oh you can do many, many things. For example actually talking with me and explaining the underlying concepts you are refering to and specifically how that relates to GPT4-o instead of just basically saying "dyor". I could say exactly the same to you but I'd rather have a conversation and share knowledge and viewpoints. Everything else seems a bit pointless
@karlopeternel7685 5 күн бұрын
yeap
@WieseTechnology 5 күн бұрын
🙌
@BrendanDobbin 5 күн бұрын
Cheers dude
@WieseTechnology 5 күн бұрын
Most welcome
@karlopeternel7685 5 күн бұрын
Slowing down is not an option
@WieseTechnology 5 күн бұрын
Definitely not
@karlopeternel7685 5 күн бұрын
great great great information
@WieseTechnology 5 күн бұрын
Thank you!👊
@karlopeternel7685 5 күн бұрын
No slowing down with SingularityNet and ASI hehe they keep grinding and building
@WieseTechnology 5 күн бұрын
💪 can't wait for further updates
@WieseTechnology 6 күн бұрын
At what point would you say "yes, this is AGI"? To find out more about the ASI Alliance and why we (as in humanity) needs them, check out the video over here kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aNGnma2g2L-ulHk.html
@BrendanDobbin 6 күн бұрын
❤
@WieseTechnology 6 күн бұрын
🙌
@BrendanDobbin 7 күн бұрын
Cheers man
@WieseTechnology 7 күн бұрын
Welcome!
@WieseTechnology 7 күн бұрын
When do you think AGI will be achieved? Did I say "ledgerless blockchain" in the video? Yes, I did. Find out more about what exactly that is and how hypercycle works in the video right here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jtt3d66dqarDmnk.html
@Gernot66 7 күн бұрын
Solange dass auch wieder nur eine AG wird damit Spekulanten vom Geldstrom abgreifen können nützt das alles nichts.
@nani3209 7 күн бұрын
If singularityNET rollout anything interesting maybe a chat interface, the focus of the world can be shift to Hyperon which is beneficial to the project
@WieseTechnology 7 күн бұрын
Yes a text interface would be amazing. I'll be all over it once that happens
@throwAwayAccount1Million-kf2uy 7 күн бұрын
I rarely comment on KZfaq videos, but I just wanted to say... well done. ASI is going to the moon.
@WieseTechnology 7 күн бұрын
Thank you so much for your comment!🙌👊
@arslanmughal2024 8 күн бұрын
What If merger happens and there are future contracts opened for Agix will they keep working?
@WieseTechnology 8 күн бұрын
I can't give you any different answers on a different video
@arslanmughal2024 8 күн бұрын
What If merger happens and there are future contracts opened for FET will they keep working?
@WieseTechnology 8 күн бұрын
Probably not but the exchange will have to let you know how to proceed
@arslanmughal2024 8 күн бұрын
What If merger happens and there are future contracts opened for FetAI, will they keep working?
@WieseTechnology 8 күн бұрын
I won't be able to give you a different answer here either
@karlopeternel7685 9 күн бұрын
✨️👊✨️
@WieseTechnology 9 күн бұрын
🙌
@ioanmoney 9 күн бұрын
Thx for update! Love your content!
@ioanmoney 9 күн бұрын
Viel Glück mit asi!
@WieseTechnology 9 күн бұрын
@@ioanmoney Most welcome and thanks for your comment!
@vivarantx 10 күн бұрын
I like NTX tokenomics better
@WieseTechnology 10 күн бұрын
Haven't looked at the tokenomics, I'm mainly interested in the fundamentals
@fseesauras 12 күн бұрын
The voices changed which upset me lol
@WieseTechnology 12 күн бұрын
It did? My favourite is still the same
@fseesauras 12 күн бұрын
@@WieseTechnology yeah the first one was like a cheerful guy they changed his voice to another guy I don't feel as comfortable with
@WieseTechnology 12 күн бұрын
@@fseesauras That's bs they could've just added an additional voice
@fseesauras 12 күн бұрын
@@WieseTechnology yeah I have to get used to the new ones now it may take a while
@WieseTechnology 12 күн бұрын
BE CAREFUL AND DON'T GET SCAMMED ALWAYS DOUBLE AND TRIPLE CHECK TAKE YOUR TIME WITH THE MERGER YOU CAN SWAP WHENEVER; THE EXCHANGE RATES ARE FIXED JUST BE ENTIRELY SURE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT CONTRACT FROM OFFICIAL CHANNELS ONCE IT'S LIVE Thank you everyone for watching and be safe out there