Then Noas will appear and save all species take them to a new world for future Inventions..humans will never learn the simple lesson of Live and let live but dig again / mistep in to Gods domain..

Some people, such as that above, have developed keen critically thinking skills. They can spot when others are trying to pull the wool over their eyes.

Who gave the Jews the land they had in Medina? Allah?

Large segments of our population find comfort in immersing themselves in climate science denial echo chamber information sources that tend to convince their fans that all countering scientific data should be rejected as being corrupted. The claim, that the sun's energy falling on Earth is responsible for any changes we see, has been repeatedly debunked by the vast mainstream scientific community. These deniers have been convinced that only their tiny out-liner experts are worth listening to. They will never find citations for the following articles listed in their favorite denier sources. Climate change: How do we know (NASA) NASA measures direct evidence humans are causing climate change (CBSnews) Observational Evidence of Increasing Global Radiative Forcing (agupubs - wiley) The GISTEMP climate spiral 1880-2021 (NASA) A dire forecast: Scientists used AI to find planet could cross critical warming threshold sooner than expected (CNN) World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency 2022 (Academic dot OUP dot com) Satellite data confirms globe is warming rapidly (Axios) Humanity is ‘cutting down the tree of life’, warn scientists Worst mass extinction event in Earth’s history was caused by global warming analogous to current climate crisis (News dot mnogabay dot com) Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines (PNAS dot org) What's Really Warming the World? (Bloomberg) More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change (Cornell University) Climate: What did We Know and When Did We Know it? (KZfaq) CO2 Concentration - Last 800,000 years (Scripps dot UCSD dot edu) Greenhouse gas (Wikipedia) Radiative forcing (Wikipedia) Americans are surprisingly rational about climate change, new study finds (KZfaq) Heartland's '6 Reasons To Be A Climate-Change Skeptic' Are Six Demonstrable Falsehoods (Forbes) Skeptical Science (skeptical science dot com) Typically nuclear power fans continue to assume that we have at least 20-30 years to turn this 'Titanic' around using their favorite nuclear technology. They have become masterful in excluding the following warnings from their consciousness. I urge readers to search for the following article titles. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5 years ago.

Actually the research efforts began during the 1950s. That is often downplayed in current promotional pitches for current experimental machines. Many sales pitchers are hoping to attract private investors in the efforts that they are immersed in and many of those investors fail to seek out critical assessments. They typically don't understand the full story and are easily snowed by the experimenters. In the case of the National Ignition Facility (NIF) the vast majority of its funding has always come from U.S. federal reviews that are targeted towards the nation's nuclear weapons program. The project managers have always been masterful in obscuring that fact when they present NIF to the press and the general public. NIF has always been a thermonuclear weapon (H-bomb) design and training research tool. The December 5, 2022, experiment announcement included a weapons related target material to measure the effects of the prompt fusion neutron flux upon that material. Most nuclear fusion presenters have become masterful in focussing upon the desired future goals while not mentioning the huge array of difficulties encountered since the experiments began.

Nuclear power promoters tend to be in love with their favorite technology and continue to assume that we have 20-30 years to turn this 'Titanic' around. Many have immersed themselves in climate science denial echo chamber information sources so as the reinforce their deeply held beliefs that the climate concerns are BS. They, like the vast majority of Earth's 8.0+ billion humans, have become masterful in excluding the following warnings from their consciousness. I urge readers to search for the following article titles to learn some things that they will never find on their comforting climate science denial websites. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5 years ago. ---------- Climate change: How do we know (NASA) NASA measures direct evidence humans are causing climate change (CBSnews) Observational Evidence of Increasing Global Radiative Forcing (agupubs - wiley) The GISTEMP climate spiral 1880-2021 (NASA) A dire forecast: Scientists used AI to find planet could cross critical warming threshold sooner than expected (CNN) World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency 2022 (Academic dot OUP dot com) Satellite data confirms globe is warming rapidly (Axios) Humanity is ‘cutting down the tree of life’, warn scientists Worst mass extinction event in Earth’s history was caused by global warming analogous to current climate crisis (News dot mnogabay dot com) Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines (PNAS dot org) What's Really Warming the World? (Bloomberg) More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change (Cornell University) Climate: What did We Know and When Did We Know it? (KZfaq) CO2 Concentration - Last 800,000 years (Scripps dot UCSD dot edu) Greenhouse gas (Wikipedia) Radiative forcing (Wikipedia) Americans are surprisingly rational about climate change, new study finds (KZfaq) Heartland's '6 Reasons To Be A Climate-Change Skeptic' Are Six Demonstrable Falsehoods (Forbes) Skeptical Science (skeptical science dot com)

It is common for people to pitch the projects that they work on, or have become fans of, as being the best approach. You are referring to the Wendelstein 7-X machine which has broken some records. Typically, the pitches emphasize one set of parameters while not mentioning other key parameters. Most fans have no interest in seeking out critical assessments. Perhaps you were not made aware that this machine is not intended to generate electrical energy and it has never employed fusion fuel to achieve the records that were widely broadcast to the naive public. They experiment with hydrogen plasmas, not D/T plasmas intended to generate 14.1 MeV neutrons. Most pitches focus upon the future goals rather than upon the details of the announced experiments.