Bosniaks are just islamized serbs, everybody knows that
@onethreeifyКүн бұрын
8:45 Hötzendorf's warmongering was because he wanted to marry a woman of the nobility, Gina von Reininghaus, which he couldn't do because he was of low birth. So he wanted to prove his manliness 23:45 Hötzendorf concluded that Austrian mobilization and a German ultimatum can make Russia back down.
@user-gv1wu2mv4mКүн бұрын
Multiple lies and hidden facts that are crucial in this video. As usual when westerners discuss Serbs and Serbia. Lack of knowledge is disastrous. No wonder why many Serbs think west is against us. I will write few lines, without idea to downgrade Serbian nationalism or obvious Serbian resentment towards Muslims. 1. You have hidden fact that Bosnia had Serbian majority back then with even many Muslims having Serb identity. It was not Serbian nationalists who had claims. It was local population (Serbs) who had claims over Bosnia. Which is quit normal, local populations always have claims on land they live in. 2. You missed to mention Croat, Turk, Hungarian and German nationalism when discussing Bosnian crisis. Even emerging Bosnian identity. All of them had historical, ethnical and religious claims over Bosnia. I believe it is because your sources are heavily biased as most of western sources about Serbian history and I don't blame you. Amount of lies and manipulations makes individuals unable to grasp these topics. You have to spend life figuring out what is truth and what is propaganda. But western tendency to blame Serbs for everything is getting forms of racism to be honest. No wonder wars are inevitable here. No justice no peace. That rule applies everywhere so it applies here in Balkans. I don't say videos like this are reason for wars. I say ideas that prevail in this video are same ideas that lead leaders to make bad decisions and let multiethnic areas like Balkans spiral into cruel wars. 2. Karadjordjevic dynasty was never hostile towards Habsburg. I just cant believe you could use such words. You fell for that trap. Its how pro-Habsburg historians justify what Austrians did to Serbs. I cant find any form of hostility made by Serbian dynasty towards Austrians. Dispute over Bosnia was not an act of hostility. Serbia was under huge pressure to help local population in Bosnia which saw Austrian occupation as a bad thing. Bosnian Serbs are part Serbian politics since early middle ages. Not sure how you can avoid conflict when wishes and needs of majority of local population are neglected. Serbia even avoided acts of open hostility even when local Serbian population was oppressed. Patriotic Serbs pressured Serbian dynasty to act but Serbian politicians skillfully avoided hostilities with Austrians. No rational Serb thought a war with Austria is a good thing. I think you meant that Karadjordjevic dynasty was openly pro-French and pro-Russian just like Obrenovic dynasty was openly pro-Austrian. So loss of favorite dynasty made Austrian furious. Totally different thing. 3. Blaming personal problems of Austrian officers for their bad and evil decisions is totally opposite of how you blame Serbian nationalists. It was Austrian nationalism and imperialism together with catholic fundamentalism. Not his bad relations with Women. Western historiography just downplays Austrian imperial ideology. One of the main reasons majority of Bosnia wanted to join Serbia. Serbs would be quit happy to live in prosperous and rich Austrian Empire, but acts of assimilation, ethnic engineering, sectarian divisions which made orthodox Christians less favorable group made Serbs wanting more free life even if it meant lack of economic advantages. I wish someone could prove me wrong. I just cant stand feeling that westerners are that stupid or that evil (not talking about author of the video but about historians who are source for such videos). Please prove me wrong if I am wrong. Thanks
@POLITICUS-DANICUSКүн бұрын
They did succed in South Schleswig
@signoguns8501Күн бұрын
Are you German? You have an almost perfect English accent with a slight hint of German in there lol. Am I right?
@dangoth6667Күн бұрын
11:41 I don't think it should be called a ministry of 'confessions'. Yes, the word 'wyznanie' does mean confession, as in 'wyznanie wiary' does mean 'confession of faith', but the standalone word 'wyznanie' means religious denomination. I'd sooner translate it as 'Ministry of religious faiths and public enlightenment'.
@PetroBeherhaКүн бұрын
Conspiracy theories kill democracy, full stop.
@PaleliveКүн бұрын
Hands away from Serbian Bosnia.
@grandcrowdadforde6127Күн бұрын
well done! what a complicated MESS ! No wonder they all went to war 1914 to dissolve this clusterfluck !
@cov.teo.8131Күн бұрын
Austro-Hungary really tried to be a smart-ass and piss-off three of it's neighbors in one move.
@wolfgangsaurenbach-pk4ikКүн бұрын
Unglaublich : " Der behinderte Wilhelm II ist alleine verantwortlich für den Ausbruch von WK I " die billigst Art Geschichte zu erklären , eine Schande ! Vergleiche den Vertrag von Versailles , 1919 😛 Du brauchst " brainstorming " mein Freund mit dem deutschen Akzent 😮😮😂 Incredible : " Handycaped Wilhelm II nd himself is responsible for outbreak of WW I " that `s the most simple way to explain history , a shame ! To compaire with the Treaty of Versailles , 1919 😛 You need brainstorming my friend with the German accent .😮😢😂
@stellarmadmanКүн бұрын
Austrians are coping soooo hard in the comments, hooolyyy, fellas get it through your thick skulls once and for all, your empire failed it was rotten and pointless.
@cov.teo.8131Күн бұрын
It's mostly Croatians who are still assmad to this day that their germanic piggy bank got demolished in the aftermath of WW1.
@RollerBallerКүн бұрын
Mighty impressive pronunciation
@raquetdudeКүн бұрын
Could you do a video on the “great Russian lie to Bulgaria” and the lasting impact it’s had. Would allow you to also cover Macedonia and Thrace.
@ZS-rw4qq2 күн бұрын
They were stabbed in the back - by Serbs and French who captured Velden am Wörthersee
@ZS-rw4qq2 күн бұрын
6:30 To be fair, panslavism was already a popular idea and a significant amount of Slavic people within the Habsburg empire were sympathetic. Obviously not all, some had similar ideas but would rather put themselves in the center, saying it is the Serbs which are in denial
@ZS-rw4qq2 күн бұрын
0:12 You'd be surprised to learn that the origins of this war are in 1975 Hercegovina uprising. Be careful when skipping history
@VojislavMoranic2 күн бұрын
Im always surprized how the Hungarians and Germans thought their empire would last. You blatantly consider Slavs as Subhumans, refuse the Czechs and Slovaks any form of governance, force Hungarization on everyone in the Hungarian part. While forcing the Hungarians to learn German because they are sub humans as well. And then you get Serbia who liberated itself. So other Slavs in the empire see a Slavic state ruled by a Slavic dynasty and go "Hell yeah". Two world wars Germans thought they were superior to Slavs, two world wars they lost. The habsburg sister fuckers and their discount mongolians never had a chance against Slavic desire for self rule. To quote the very first Slavic chieftain interviewed by foreigners "Others do not conquer our lands but we conquer theirs such things will be for as long as there is a sun in the sky and swords."
@0li9452 күн бұрын
Good pronunciation but “i” needs more eeee and mostly just more umphf like more power
@raulianes72722 күн бұрын
Fiume was Italian! Wilson was an ass!
@user-ml1vz4vq7j2 күн бұрын
Vorarlberg is part of Switzerland
@ST19732 күн бұрын
Rijeka is NOT Croatian largest city, after this sentence I stopped watching the video
@matijabozic92403 күн бұрын
This video is propaganda dog video
@Svarog08153 күн бұрын
I am from that area and i can say this was very interesting. They dont teach you that. Croatians think it was always ours. The italian origins of whole dalmatia doesnt get spoken out loud because of nationalism. Reviewing the last 100years Croatia came out very good considering they sided always with the wrong side ( eg. Nazi Germany ). History is a bi###
@171Mirza3 күн бұрын
As Bosnian, Im happy that Bosnia wasnt annexed by Serbia
@tomgu22852 күн бұрын
As a bosnian serb sad it wasnt and lmao you guys didn't identify as bosniaks back then
@IdontKnowAtAlllol3 күн бұрын
Imperial Austria is democratic if you mind the fact that the voting system disproportionately benefited the wealth and the Germans within the Austrian half of the empire
@wind59383 күн бұрын
Hey fr I keep coming back to this video and recommending it to friends such an important event in the lead up to the Great War and not enough people know about it
@user-uf5nv5cb3b3 күн бұрын
Ahranthal completely PANTSED Izvoltzki. But it fucked everyone. Serbia BETRAYED. Russia HUMILIATED. Poor Austria, wanting to rid itself from the Germans, only found themselves tethered all the closer to Berlin. It has been, is now and always will be some damned thing in the Balkans. Always
@user-uf5nv5cb3b3 күн бұрын
The French were 100% right. The last time in their Glorious History.
@user-uf5nv5cb3b3 күн бұрын
The Documents were in Ivolzki's hand.
@danielm63193 күн бұрын
In early Middle Ages Bosnia was couple hundred years part of either Serbia or Croatia (925- 1102). But Posavina, Unska (until 1527), Tropolje and Hercegovina which were part of Croatia and were stolen from Croatia after 1102, given to Bosnia by either Hungary or Ottomans to Bosnia. For. e.g. Petar Kružić died for Bihać. Hercegovina and Tropolje were Dalmatian. From 1322 Bosniq claim Hercegovina and other.
@danielm63193 күн бұрын
You Italians, Austrians, Serbs and Hungarian, even Slovenes, try to stole Rijeka from us Croats. /s Joke aside, we all know before Romance arrive in the name of Roman Empire here were Vučedol culture inhabitans and Illyrians, even Greeks before Rome and Slavs.
@kidmohair81513 күн бұрын
oh that von Hötzendorf....he was such a warmonger. 22:30 “public opinion”. the chimera of. as if the average person in Russia in the early 20th century, even knew where Serbia, or Bosnia, were. or cared about what the “distant” people in those places might be facing. the average person of the time in Russia was more concerned with much closer to home issues, like food and shelter. I have always had an issue with the “pressure” of “public opinion” being said to be a cause of conflict. any public opinion on the Balkan Crisis that may have existed in Russia of the time, had been whipped up by the imperialist press in St Petersburg, at the behest of those who stood to profit from such things.
@eedwardgrey23 күн бұрын
Okay, so Italian troops besieged a city to force them to accept that they were independent from Italy..............
@nostradamusofgames55083 күн бұрын
so the serbian ultranationalists were trying to start the great war for a while now, why am i not surprised.
@tomgu22852 күн бұрын
Wtf are you talking about?? Serbs were the majority in bosnia and we wanted to be part of serbia it was Austria hungary imperialisim who started the nonsense
@somemeansfish89873 күн бұрын
"It would far increase the influence of Bulgaria,Russia's client state in the Balkans" I definitely wish I was less late to the party with this one but first of all it didn't just increase it's size,it put it on the map to being with for the first time since around 1368 Secondly Bulgaria wasn't THE russian aligned stae in the Balkans,overtime the serb government would prove a lot more compliant with russian commands than the Bulgarian one
@Triple_Alliance3 күн бұрын
Conrad von Hotzendorf… the man responsible for ww1
@dandaratramadol30073 күн бұрын
Useful video. Read a lot about downfall of Ottomans and political and societal structure that came with Habsburgs from peoples perspective, but never from a broader perspective. Thank you for this.
@TenOrbital4 күн бұрын
A tragedy. If he’d continued Bismarck’s diplomatic system of alliance with Russia and Austria and good relations with Britain, and his father’s support for a parliamentary system of government, the world would have been quite different.
@tereziamarkova28224 күн бұрын
I've been fascinated by Ludwig ever since I saw the 2012 German biopic with Sabin Tambrea. It's quite historically accurate and portrays Ludwig as a complex figure, a daydreamer with volatile temper who wasn't a good king, but still deserves some sympathy because, behind all the castle building and junk, he was actually a pretty tragic figure. It's interesting to compare him to his contemporary, Franz Joseph I., who also became an emperor at a young age and faced just as many challenges, but for all his faults was willing to face them, keeping the country together throughout most of his reign (and then he started the war that destroyed it but shhhh!).
@wiel59084 күн бұрын
woodrow wilson was an absolute cuck
@wiel59084 күн бұрын
idk if i should call hotzendorf a simp or a hopeless stupid romantic
@salongreed4 күн бұрын
Worth noting as well that this crisis further strained Austria-Italian relations as well, I’m surprised it wasn’t mentioned
@dominikbt78914 күн бұрын
I have question my great grandpa was born in Bosni in 1898 does that mean he was born in Ottoman empire or Austria Hungary
@chrishanzek89304 күн бұрын
Ottoman Empire
@cocokikic57774 күн бұрын
So Serbia is the bad guy when it claims its right in a country where 45% of the population is Serbs, and the AH empire is the good guy when it annexes a country it never had before, nor does it have its own population there. Nice angle. I would say Germanic imperial.
@petarjovanovic14814 күн бұрын
Yes, most probably.
@TheAustrianAnimations872 күн бұрын
"So Serbia is the bad guy when it claims its right in a country where 45% of the population is Serbs" Same as Serbia claiming Kosovo, a region where over 90% of the people are Albanians.
@BasileiaRomaionHistory4 күн бұрын
Imagine if the war started in 1908 GBR and France staying Neutral in a quick war.
@lukakajevic79275 күн бұрын
Nice video man. It was interesting to see since I am a Serb living in the Serb Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It gives perspective on how it was seen on the outside. I would like to just point out that in our view, Serbs from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbs in general, it was not a case of "Serb nationalists want this or that", it was Serbs wanted to live free and united. AH rule in Bosnia was seen as nothing else but occupation and the struggle against it was nothing else but the struggle for freedom. The National Deffence a mere spy network, some of its leaders and prominent members were writers, poets, artists of various types. While the Serbian lineage alternated beetween the Obrenovic dynasty and Karadjordjevic dynasty (the first being oriented towards the AH Empire and the latter towards the Russian Empire), the annexation of Bosnia would not have been looked lightly upon by the people and Serbs from all across no matter who was in power. To this day, for us, AH Empire was nothing more but an imperial occupier and Gavrilo Princip is a heroic freedom fighter.
@lukakajevic79275 күн бұрын
The National Deffence WASNT a mere spy network is what I meant to say in the comment.
@TheAustrianAnimations874 күн бұрын
@@lukakajevic7927 Austro-Hungarian rule in Bosnia resulted in freedom of religion and the construction of many roads, railways, factories, buildings, schools, etc. What did Princip do? Kill an anti-war reformer who wanted to give the Serbs more rights and deliberately provoke Austria-Hungary? Yeah, definitely a "hero".
@lukakajevic79274 күн бұрын
@@TheAustrianAnimations87 He was a freedom fighter who fired at an occupier. Its as simple as that. Also, your version of history as an Austrian on this subject is to be expected quite biased. Not only were Serbs not in a great position, Benjamin Kalay was tasked with enticing the creation of the "Bosnian" nation, requesting that the Serbs from Bosnia and Herzegovina declare themselves as Bosnian in order to receive favorable treatment. You dont sugarcoat occupation.
@Agomacule4 күн бұрын
@@TheAustrianAnimations87Princip killed Franz Ferdinand for what he represented, in his eyes. Whether Austro-Hungarian rule in Bosnia improved Bosnia or not, was irrelevant
@nosmokejazwinski62974 күн бұрын
There is no such as “Serb republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina”, go back to whatever parallel dimension you came from.
@cocknfire8305 күн бұрын
Gaijin as a sponsor = A big fat juicy dislike
@moosesandmeese9695 күн бұрын
It is hugely irresponsible of you to not mention that the Boer Republics were slave states and that the Dutch settlers' primary reason and motivation for maintaining independence from Britain was to keep the institution of enslavement of native Africans. That's arguably the singular reason they desired to maintain independence, as evidenced by the Dutch slaveholders' own words. I understand you only mention the Boer Republics briefly, but since their main purpose for formation was preserving slavery, even the briefest mention of them should include that fact. It's especially irresponsible for you to say that there was any reason other than preserving the instutition of slavery as to why the Dutch settlers desired independence. The British certainly weren't much better than the Boers in their treatment of native Africans, but it is horrendously academically dishonest to say the Dutch settlers' desire for independence was because of anything but slavery. It's as dishonest as saying the American civil war was not caused by slavery.
@anthonyruby26685 күн бұрын
The video helps justify saying: "What started WWI? Austria was Hungry for Turkey!" (Well, old Turkish territory)
@malimate26605 күн бұрын
8/1872 - The Serbian government was preparing a declaration of independence and a declaration of accession to Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Russian government refused support. Google ....Wiki...Greater Serbia