Silent T

Brilliant design multiple layers of safety and used in battle of bulge artillery didn’t need clear view of German infantry cloud cover didn’t matter look at pictures of that battle and see trees cut off 20ft off ground foxholes couldn’t protect you Also in pacific decimated Kamakazi attack Japan stunned by how accurate our defense was saved many ships

1:11 no this is false the first variants like the nine AIM-9B, AIM-9E,AIM-9F(exported AIM-9B),and AIM-9P used a fragmentation warhead the missiles the us navy developed used a continuous rod that expanded 360 degrees from the circumference of the missile

this video is satanic as fuck

Minor correction: the Tallboy and Grand Slam bombs were not designed as armor piercing, but as "earthquake" bombs, meant to bury themselves 50-100+ feet deep, then blow up and create a huge cavity which would collapse the foundations of what they landed near. Near misses were more damaging than direct hits.

THIS EXPLAINS WHY THEY PAINTED THE SHIPS WITH THOSE ZIG-ZAGTRIAGLE SHAPES! omg thanks for the video

WE'RE ON THAT 🅱️ESH!

you forgot kevlar lining which also protects against hesh, but props for mentioning spaced armor

Thanks, now I can make my own air burst munitions since its just a radar with an oscillator

Your graphics artist needs to fix the ship. U.S. Navy ships NEVER fly the Ensign from the stern underway. The stern display is used ONLY when anchored or moored pierside.

dart - outer shell - artillery shell - extended range charge outer = supersonic super-cruise when the entire blue(except the first "flange" to pointy dart is redesigned for air bubble in front of "flange"). mach 1.2 with that blue and dart.

650시흥 82년6월까지ROKN

What's incredible is that CIA released all of the technical details of the KH-9, BUT refused to declassify the actual photographs!!! CIA doesn't want China/Russia know how sharp those photos are.

Videos like these is what I’m loving. Need more. Straight to the point , a demonstration, information at the rip! At the gate! No commercial, no 3-5 minute intro. No back story “real quick” and no body just sitting there and talking “ have you ever wondered how battle ships work? I do the same ….. etc etc. I’m against those ppl!

Nice

Yoooooo they bringing the side comments back

I think the film was processed on the satellite?

Cool I like the video thank you

“🗣️KZfaq videos i watched at midnight for 500 Alex”

That is not HEAT das HEAT-FS ( High Explosive Anti tank - Fin Stabilized

Also available in a 25mm shorty for the bradley main gun, turning a relatively small main gun into an armor killer. Side note these rounds give their crews cancer

I absolutely loved this short video

You can watch the heat round go down range.

As a former EOD, perfect

As the founding fathers intended ....

Really astounding the level of technology the Germans were producing, beleaguered as they were - they were thirty, forty years ahead of the rest of the world ... except in the nuclear field. IF Hitler hadn't cut their funding for that, one shudders to think. Thankfully, he was a Sci-Fi fan, and loved the "Wonder Weapons."

Don’t you hate premature detonation?

What was the success rate of depth charge attacks? How would you know for sure if you destroyed a sub?

Titanium, not tungsten.

Great video...👍

Imagine human evolutions from bow and arrow into tank shells only to be re-evilute back to arrow shaped round from bow and arrow era 😂

Maybe check the animation of the bombs dropping at the end of the video. I believe that they dropped in a predefined sequence from different parts of the bomb-bay, so that the remaining bombs didn't affect the plane's centre of gravity. Dropping from the front to the back as in the video would have caused the plane to pitch up and stall/crash.

Another case of too little,too late..

One thing I’m not understanding is what controlled the missile in flight? Did the rear fins have control surfaces?

The Original Monica system design started in 1941 for a audio warning system that gave a rapidly increasing tone in the bomber crew's headset if there was an aircraft behind the bomber that was decreasing in range. Fitting of it to RAF Bombers did start in early 1943, but was then delayed when it was found to jam the Oboe Blind Bombing System. After Oboe was modified to overcome the issue by June 1943, rapid installation of Monica was done on the RAF bomber force. However what was originally designed for bombers flying on individual routing to a target was now being used on bombers flying in a concentrated Bomber Stream and the Monica equipment was going off all of the time as the Bombers weaved around in the Stream. Most bomber crews got so pissed off with this distraction that they turned the equipment off. By September 1943, Bomber Command and the equipment's designers at Telecommunications Research Establishment (TRE) realised that Monica Mark 1 (AKA Audio Monica) was a Failure and TRE came up with Monica Mark III (AKA Visual Monica) which is the system shown on the Video. It used the CRT display and receiver systems from the ASV Mk 2 radar located and operated by the Wireless Operator on the Bomber (the equipment being recycled was being phased out of service with Coastal Command). The first 50 system built were issued to 61 and 106 Squadrons of 5 Group Bomber Command in late October 1943. The initial reaction from the Squadron's was the equipment was very easy to use and German night fighters manoeuvring in behind the bomber were easily noted and evaded. A crash program was instigated to modify as many Monica equipped aircraft as possible, abet there were only 600 CRT / Receiver sets available from UK stocks and 200 of them were required for the Mosquito night fighters planned for Bomber Support in 100 Group (the Mosquito Bombers also got the Equipment in the Mark 1 format which worked OK as they didn't fly in the Bomber Stream). Aircraft fitted with the H2S Bombing and Navigation radar didn't get Monica as a system that displayed close in contacts to the underside of the Bomber using the H2S radar was developed called Fishpond and that was fitted to Bomber Command Pathfinder aircraft in October 1943 onwards. Flensburg didn't become operational in a major way until March 1944 and the Bomber Command Operational Research Section who monitored Loss rates of aircraft by types of special equipment fitted to aircraft did note that losses of aircraft fitted with Monica which had been lower than aircraft not fitted with it was changing rapidly throughout April and May 1944 and they suspected the Germans were homing on it. Of Course this was confirmed when the JU-88 was captured. Trials found out how effective Flensburg was and when attempts to modify Monica were made to make it more difficult home on failed, it was removed from all of the Aircraft which operated in the Bomber Stream. Aircraft that didn't operate in a Bomber Stream like the Mosquitos retained the equipment as the primary reason it was removed was to avoid giving away the position of a Bomber Stream from decoy and spoof aircraft that were attempting to spilt the German night defences. The USAAF actually built their own copy of Monica and fitted it to their escort fighters. It was based on the Monica Mark 1, but used a flashing light and a bell to give a warning. The US version of Monica in a modified form ended the war!!! Four of them were each fitted to a pair of bombs dropped on Japan in August 1945. They were the radar fuze system for the Atomic Bombs!!

I didn’t see anything trimaran, but I did see a catamaran.

Hesh, that's why tanks have spall liners on the inside

Could I possibly use the portion about HEAT rounds in a video I'm doing on drone warfare? It's the perfect graphic I need. Would absolutely give credit and a link to your channel.

Bro said kilometer and kilograms ☠️☠️☠️

Thank you for the content ❤🎉

Is this device is telemeter

Hey you should make the background audio so loud and annoying we can't hear the narration. Cool.

Acquired

X marks the spot 🎯

Now do USS Liberty

Great Now let's make sure gaijin add it on the me 262

Ok so if you're fighting, take down the rangefinder then go as far as possible

The US Navy has recognized it deficient in firepower for current amphibious operations. They have considered bringing back the Battleship or the 1990s Arsenal Ship concept. I believe a modernized LSM(R) would be perfect for the role.

Slight correction - craft had 0.5 hp motor not 1.5.

0:00 Mmm yes, a sparrow on the wing tip of an F16.