Жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@tammihazard8362 5 күн бұрын
I started getting them in my 40s last year i had cyst they did biopsy it was negative but they had me doing 3 more xrays that cant be good . No more for me i self check monthly
@DianneElizabeth64 6 күн бұрын
Thermography showed a red flag. Ultrasound found two vascular masses in my ducts. They are bullying me to get a mammogram. Now they are telling me that I will have one when I have a biopsy. I don’t want one and I don’t want titanium put in to my breasts where my tumors are. Like why would I purposely put a piece of metal in my body when I need my immune system. It’s already weak.
@melissapenrose6054 12 күн бұрын
Has anyone on here ever heard of a KONING MACHINE ?
@janlabbate3277 26 күн бұрын
My breast cancer was found on Thermagram. No pain just pictures! Since it was stage 1, had a radiation (which caused me to lose 2 inches in height) and I cried each time. No chemo thankfully and that was in 2011. Thermagrapy is the way to go!!
@Lightandangles Ай бұрын
Very misleading video! Mammograms (2D) are extremely effective. 1 in 8 women are going to get a diagnosis of breast cancer in their lifetime. Regular screening could save your life!
@pramuanchutham7355 Ай бұрын
You're very poor explainer, jumping ahead of yourself and changing unfinished subjects. Just because it's old technology doesn't mean it's poor. Be precise, doc! 😮
@nowhere982 Ай бұрын
I'm 70 small breasts.....got an inverted nipple what's the best test ?????? Going tomorrow 7th june24
@moramejia88 2 ай бұрын
So are you telling me my mammogram in my extreme breast test means nothing also ultrasound? :(
@TimeTravelingCrystal 2 ай бұрын
He didn't even finish his thoughts or give a full argument. Just a bunch of statistics... these are real women with vakuable lives looking for helpful information, KZfaq should take this video down because it is NOT helpful! House phones and Teslas don't belong in this conversation!
@rainbowradian1 2 ай бұрын
I refused to have mammograms anymore
@ronan582 2 ай бұрын
*Promosm*
@sweetpeanmolly 2 ай бұрын
I was one of those people who religiously went for my screenings. I also have breast implants. On two occasions, the test deflated two implants. I’m not going for another one.
@nuimage6336 3 ай бұрын
Perhaps I missed something, but it appears that there is some confusion surrounding the video title. After reviewing Dr. Levandovsky's master class webinar, I can attest that he strongly recommends the utilization of 3D mammography and breast MRI for breast cancer screening. Conversely, he does not view the use of 2D mammography as beneficial for detecting breast cancer.
@cherylremington8695 3 ай бұрын
Most insurance makes you get a mammogram before they'll pay for an ultrasound even though every time I've ever had a mammogram I've had to get an ultrasound because my breasts were dense
@barbaraswindle9669 3 ай бұрын
I had a mammogram last week,i also have a breast cyst,after the mammogram my brest was blue and purple and extremely sore,i was miserable for about a week as the mammogram busted the cyst in my breast and i had a foul yellowish creamy substance come out and i observed small tiny black specks about two days after and haven't a clue as to what the black specs were if anyone reading this knows please comment,im not going back for another it caused more harm than good in my opinion.
@maryconner332 3 ай бұрын
I had lumpy breast, had a biopsy said it was breast cancer in situ 1 cm it was in a milk duct. I went through radiation chemo. Followed by more chemo. Followed by my left breast developing orange peel appearance and hardening of the skin in the area of radiation. Followed by a mastectomy, followed by recurrence of cancer in area of radiation. Followed by stem cell transplant which almost killed me. I have been cancer free since 1995. Now I’m finding out after the hell I went through that breast cancer in situ is not even considered breast cancer. I am so pissed I went through all that for what??!
@Healing_Decibels 2 ай бұрын
How did you find out you have in situ in the first place?
@Healing_Decibels 2 ай бұрын
I suggest you watch h Gilbert Welch MD he talks a lot about this scenario
@carolynnmathisen8754 3 ай бұрын
I fortunately had a mammogram which found an early TNBC. I’m listening to you but I’m seething. If it was for men mammogram would be a sacrament
@ronaldfullman5294 3 ай бұрын
Any man could have male breast cancer and never even know it?😮
@ZaibiDesigner 3 ай бұрын
Hey , I just watched your video and I must say that it was really informative and well-made. I was wondering if I could help you Video SEO Optimization and promotion which will help your video to reach to a wider audience and increase your subscribers and viewers.
@Mounika12313 3 ай бұрын
Nice video
@pmccdenver 4 ай бұрын
Find Out Your Personal CRS (Cancer Risk Score) through a 5-minute self-assessment. www.pmccdenver.com/crs
@queenpower9514 4 ай бұрын
Everyone wants to say something until they are the one or their daughter/mother/sister/wife have a cancer that could have been treated with local excision, but instead it’s widespread. Doctors are salary workers, they don’t make more by trying to treat you. They do things by evidence of risk vs benefits. It’s your body at the end of the day, it doesn’t hurt doctors you say no or yes. Stop trying to demonized the medical industry; yes, it’s a business, but they ain’t going to fail just because a few of you don’t want to be treated. Stop being delusional
@lillianbarker4292 5 ай бұрын
My yearly mammogram caught my breast cancer at stage 1 when I was 73. There’s no history of breast cancer in my family and yes I have dense breasts. It turns out that I have HER2 cancer which is more dangerous. I think it’s irresponsible to tell people not to get a mammogram. It’s safe and takes 5 minutes.
@NoMoreTears64 5 ай бұрын
I had a mammogram that "showed something " I didn't get another one for 7 years. That one also "showed something " Biopsy confirmed a tumor and they quickly whisked me to surgery. A 1mm tumor was removed. 2 lymph nodes were removed. They felt I had cancer and needed chemo and radiation. I refused chemo and was super reluctant on the radiation but finally caved to all of the pressure. I have not returned for a mammogram since then and do not plan on EVER having another one. I'm 64 and it's been 6 years since that diagnosis. I don't think that 1mm "tumor" would have ever caused me problems. It's ALL about making money. There is HUGE money in cancer treatments.
@MG-xt3wu Ай бұрын
Maybe it was different 6 years ago, but any area of breast cancer under 5mm and no lymph nodes does not require chemo. Only radiation if lumpectomy, and that is to prevent reoccurrence.
@florencerobie6641 5 ай бұрын
IF YOU SUPPORT NO MAMMOGRAMS, I TRUST YOU HAVE A VALID ALTERNATIVE!!!! I AND THOUSANDS OF WOMEN WOULD ‘NOT’ BE ALIVE IF IT HAD NOT BEEN FOR MAMMOGRAMS!!!! BE SAVVY WOMEN OUT THERE!
@annrae1597 5 ай бұрын
These people are killing women telling them not to have mammograms...I have a yearly one and got called back last year..they found a lump I couldn't even feel yet and I got tested and it was cancer so I had it out...a little scar on the top of my breast..5 days of radiation to get any straggler cells ,no side effects..don't listen to these idiots..if I hadn't gone ,the cancer would still be growing in me.
@HoneyLove77 5 ай бұрын
I wish this was explained better! I am getting a mammogram tomorrow adI have no clue what is being discussed. This us too seriously to be beating around the hush or getting off topic! Just say get this instead and why!! That's all!!!
@Private-wj4nd 5 ай бұрын
If mammograms were risk free, that would be different. However, exposing yourself to ionizing radiation (damaging & can turn on cancer causing BRCA genes), and risking false +/- results at a rate of 70% or more… the risks simply do not exceed the reward. We can easily develop pain free, low risk tests. Mammograms are a cash cow, that only financially hurt women, but also cause physical injury are unacceptable. Try this procedure on men to test for testicular & prostate cancer! (Never going to happen). The WHI was a big-pharma, big-medicine fear campaign against women. In fact, bio-identical hormone replacement therapy in proper ratios (meaning including progesterone) protect against female reproductive cancers. Further, reducing the risk of female reproductive cancers whilst increasing the risk of disease in every other organ system is not appropriate. Protect you heart, brain, liver, pancreas, joints, tensions, etc.!!! A life well lived does not include all these money making big pharma induced illnesses. My body. My choice. # make the ERA law
@TheYazmanian 5 ай бұрын
And what if the doctor insists? They insist on zapping us yearly at the dentist just to get our teeth cleaned too. If you resist enough, they dismiss you as a patient. It's not really informed consent if I my refusal to consent results in dismissal and therefore means I can't receive treatments for things. It's absurd.
@MR-rj2qw 5 ай бұрын
I payed for my last ultrasound and I plan on getting those instead of mammograms as long as no one gives me a reason why the latter is better for me. It is not too expensive if you compare it to what the vet takes whenever my cat has some minor health issues…
@jenamaste131 5 ай бұрын
it’s exposing people to more radiation, so then they can really be a cancer patients, make you think they caught it on time , then you go for treatment, make you believe thanks to this unnecessary text you still alive, to them get cancer again in years later. It’s all a trap. Yes , like Chemo, they know the patience is almost dying yet, they always suggest cancer patients to Chemotherapy, and surgeries to then still die. Some said they are cancer free to then get it back few years later. It’s all a money making agenda, and we are all their puppet . Why doesn’t the government, and all these organizations, change the food they are selling at the stores that are really fill of cancer ingredients, that our kids eat from young age, and look now how expensive the “organic” food really is. If the system really care about you, why the food isn’t more healthy, the food is more healthy is some European countries,why isn’t the water more natural, why we have all these food fill with Fructose, and chemicals that really add to disease.
@narelleworks8448 5 ай бұрын
The doctor speaks of technology yet has terrible sound. Old technology or not it found my daughter’s breast cancer at 29. It was just a precaution. If the doctor hadn’t erred on the side of a mammogram she’d have lost her life much sooner to this disease. I’d much rather have my reliable Toyota to get me from point a to b than none at all. Tesla’s aren’t affordable to the average person anyway.
@beverlyaten1775 6 ай бұрын
How many cancers are Caused by the radiation? If you have one every year, that adds up!
@kevinpatrick5162 6 ай бұрын
We need to force insurance companies to stop demanding them. My poor wife has to go through three different uncomfortable tests every time they want to screen her, and it's only because our insurance company insists on the first mammogram. The ultrasound is always the last test and we have to pay a deductible for it.
@melissaculpepper7663 4 ай бұрын
Yep…revenue!
@sassysandie2865 2 ай бұрын
They can’t make her do it. Just say no.
@Nkos52 6 ай бұрын
Wow! Where did you get this information from? As a mammographer with over 20 year experience, you are WRONG!!! STOP GIVING WOMEN WRONG INFORMATION
@rebeccaa2433 6 ай бұрын
I got one at 35, 40, and 45, but am not having any more. My doctor was okay with me skipping last year, but we’ll see going forward. This is a huge business. What no one is mentioning here are the high number of false positives. Women get treatment for a disease they don’t have all the time. The treatment is poison and shortens lives. People need to make their own decisions. I’ve realized lately I am the one in control of my medical care.
@amierichan7231 5 ай бұрын
You don't get chemotherapy for false positives. A false positive means that further testing is done to determine if you actually have breast cancer. And the percentage on 3-D mammograms is quite low.
@kolis_lady Ай бұрын
@@amierichan7231 oh my you said the percentage on a 3-D mammogram is quite low. Is that good or bad? Is it ineffective? I’m new to this topic.
@amierichan7231 Ай бұрын
@@kolis_lady sorry, I wasn't clear. The percentage of false positives (it showing you have breast cancer when you really don't) are very low with 3-D mammograms. That's a big point in their favour.
@akferren1 6 ай бұрын
Two things I’d never do 1.mammograms 2. Vaccines
@evelyncrouse4725 6 ай бұрын
I hate mammograms for breast cancer. I am not squishing my breasts for anyone. The reason is because I want to prevent cancer and not get cancer from such a stupid contraption. Furthermore, I would never ever take chemo even if I did get cancer. I would not want to be sick and vomit, lose weight and then die. I would rather die in no pain and slowly than go through chemo!
@katalinkiss120 6 ай бұрын
Funny how there is no such thing as a Testiculargram where the scrotum is put in a vice for 10-15 excruciating seconds per testicle for 2 different views
@anne-louisegoldie Ай бұрын
I wonder why that is?
@Skinthatglows69 10 күн бұрын
😂
@DianneElizabeth64 2 күн бұрын
Men are treated more delicately in the medical world
@di4085 6 ай бұрын
What percentage of women got breast cancer before mammograms?
@michellejohnson5217 6 ай бұрын
The doctor in this video says women at average risk should - at the very least - get a 3-D mammogram (!) he’s not advocating for no mammograms. Yikes. Request an ultrasound with your mammogram, it ups the detection rate
@michellejohnson5217 6 ай бұрын
I get a 3-D digital mammogram combined with bilateral ultrasound every year. I will never miss these screenings. My aunt and mother both were diagnosed w early cancer where it was highly treatable thanks to these screenings
@charliez4837 3 ай бұрын
Same! I rather trust the decisions of my GP who thankfully referred me for 2 mammograms in the past 2 years. Same with my family, my great grandmother died of breast cancer and my grandmother had it too but survived it so I am possibly at risk due to family history. I rather trust science and actual clinicians than fake scaremongering news like this 😮.
@WH2012 6 ай бұрын
The breast cancer industry is a TOTAL RACKET. Fixed it for you. ;0) ✅
@amierichan1428 6 ай бұрын
Care to elaborate on that? How about you go to the researchers who are constantly finding better treatments? You think that's for the money? Insane. You have "fixed" nothing, except a refusal to take advantage of real diagnosis, and encouraging others to do the same.
@WH2012 6 ай бұрын
@@amierichan1428 Feel free to share with us about "the researchers who are constantly finding better treatments." ;0)
@amierichan1428 6 ай бұрын
@@WH2012 Uhhh. . .do you understand that women survive types and stages of breast cancer that they didn't used to? That radical mastectomies used to be THE treatment and are now rarely performed? Would you rather had breast cancer in 1974, or now in 2024?
@suerobinson5260 5 ай бұрын
@amierichan1428- Thanks for being one of the few people with common sense.
@amierichan7231 5 ай бұрын
@@suerobinson5260 it doesn't take much effort, ya know?:-)
@marjake3147 6 ай бұрын
I never believed pumping radiation through tissue that you were trying to keep from developing cancer. If anything "suspicious" shows up on a mammogram they send you to get an ultra-sound. So I just skipped the mammogram part and went straight for that instead. If they had made this torture machine for the purpose of testing for testicular cancer you can bet it never would have made it to market or ever been used.
@amierichan1428 6 ай бұрын
Mammograms to do not "pump" radiation through any part of you. There is a the same amount as of radiation in a mammogram as flying from NYC to London and back. Pilots fly more than anyone else. They have an increase in certain cancers, the highest increase of which is melanoma. Instead of a 3% chance of getting it, they have a 5.61% chance of getting it. An annual mammogram is not increasing your odds of getting breast cancer. I know, I know, it's science and real numbers, not part of your "belief" as to what causes breast cancer.
@amierichan1428 6 ай бұрын
So here's a big ol' question for all you naysayers: Why do you think insurance companies pay for mammograms? Very few companies charge anything to the patient. Same reason they are so happy to pay for vaccines. Ultimately, it saves them money. Insurance companies are all about every dollar. Making sure women get mammograms means cancer is found early when the treatment is far easier and less extensive. And costs them less. And makes your life better.
@valeriemcvickers8970 6 ай бұрын
I have had breast cancer in both breasts, 18 years apart. Both discovered via a yearly mammogram. I dread to think what may have happened if I had relied on self examination.
@sojourner239 6 ай бұрын
This video is unclear and confusing. The title is “Stop Getting Mammograms to Prevent Breast Cancer” with “Do this instead” in the thumbnail. Then he talks about 2D mammograms as antiquated and it seems he is saying to get 3D mammograms. At around 2:20 he says if you’re average risk you could probably get away with a mammogram but not 2D, then he spends about 30 seconds of this short video talking about cellphones, house phones and Tesla, finishing with at the very least an average risk woman should get a 3D mammogram. Mammograms do not prevent breast cancer and as he stated 2D is antiquated but 3D mammography is still mammography. What is it this doctor recommends we do instead? The content is antithetical to the title.
@amierichan1428 6 ай бұрын
What this doctor is doing is getting attention and views and making money. He is not helping anyone deal with breast cancer. Most mammography places now use 3-D.
@meagiesmuse2334 6 ай бұрын
A friend of mine who had just gone through menopause discovered cancerous lumps in both of her breasts, only 3 weeks after having a "normal" mammogram. From age 30 on, I was told I must have a yearly mammogram because I had very dense breasts. It was many years later that I learned that the machine can't see through the dense tissue, and by having that many mammograms before menopause, I had raised my risk by 69%. I now compromise by having one done every 3 years since I had no children (4 X risk) and I am half Ashkenazi, which can raise genetic risk.
@amierichan1428 6 ай бұрын
Wait-- you think that that having mammograms before age 30 raised your odds of getting breast cancer by 69%? Frankly, that's crazy. Half Ashkenazi means nothing in real life. Either you inherited a mutation, or you didn't. Go get tested for that and find out for real.
@meagiesmuse2334 6 ай бұрын
@@amierichan1428- It's what I learned 20 yrs. later from a Gyn. I don't claim to be an expert. Are you? My primary told me they do not test for those mutations unless you have at least one relative who has had it. I can't afford to pay out of pocket. I agree that those who are at risk and can afford it should get tested.
@amierichan7231 6 ай бұрын
@@meagiesmuse2334I think you misunderstood what your gynecologist told you. Having mammograms does not raise your odds of getting breast cancer by anything, let alone 69%. It may improve your odds of FINDING it, but it doesn't influence you GETTING it. Next time you go, ask for clarification on that. If you know much about your family history and there is no known cancer in your background, and they didn't all get run over by buses before age 50, then the odds are very, very much in your favour. About 15 years ago, my mother's first 0:04 cousin was diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Then her sister. My mother had died from an aggressive breast cancer. My sister was diagnosed with a non-aggressive cancer 14 years younger than my mother had been. That side of the family was Ashkenazic Jewish. Uh-oh. Except here was the glitch in the equation. My maternal grandmother and her 3 older sisters all died very old (93, 95, 98 (my grandmother) and 100 (the mother of the 2 cousins with ovarian cancer)) and none of them ever had any kind of cancer. It turned out that that great aunt's husband and his family had generally died young of heart problems. So it had never shown up. But it had come from his side, and the BRCA mutations had nothing to do with my mother or sister's situations. So being Ashkenazic raises your odds of having a mutation, but if if isn't in your family, it isn't in your family. You might want to call a local university with a medical department, because they might do it for you as part of their research.
@meagiesmuse2334 6 ай бұрын
@@amierichan7231 - I am already terminally ill, (not cancer)but thanks for posting the info for others to read.
@EadsB7002 6 ай бұрын
Yikes. I also had a doctor recommend that I start mammograms at 35 and I certainly didn’t do that! While every individual needs to make their own choice I tend to err on the side of making proactive choices for my health over just blindly following blanket medical recommendations. I’ve done thermography instead since my early 30s and I highly recommend it!
@kchong228 6 ай бұрын
the explanation of 2d mammogram being not reliable due to 120 yrs is not accurate. today, medical industry are marketing by threats. they love to tell patients having cancer for continuous their cash inflow. Two books, over-diagnoses and cancer codes told us breast cancer is common but not urgent. the actual fact is that whether women should have mammograms every 2 to 3 years after 50.
@amierichan7231 6 ай бұрын
Breast cancer is "not urgent"?! You might change your mind awful quick if you ever have the terrible misfortune of being diagnosed. 1 in 8 women will be diagnosed with it in their life time. That's pretty urgent.
@kchong228 6 ай бұрын
@@amierichan7231 really, 1: if u are interested u can spend time to read these 2 books; 2: i had few friends who were diagnosed with breast cancer but they didn’t follow the modern medical treatments. they still survived for more than 10 years by changing their life style. believe it or not, is up to u.
@YorkieUniverse1 6 ай бұрын
My last mammogram was in January '22 and I was diagnosed in July '22 with HER2 Stage 3, Grade 3 breast cancer with lymph node involvement. I had multiple tumors but one was so large that I have no idea how the mammogram missed it.
@patsmith8035 4 ай бұрын
The mammogram may have caused it along with the arrows people have taken.
@Healing_Decibels 2 ай бұрын
@@patsmith8035watch breast surgeon Laura esserman, she said especially if you had an arrow mammograms May not be helpful because of the speed of progression