Thank you for watching! 🙂❤️

It's based on my college English class. 🙂

It's based on my college English class. 🙂

I agree! 🙂❤️

Yes, but only rhe voice; the rest (especially the text) are made by us. 🙂

Yes, but for the cultural relativist these are acceptable (or rather must be accepted).

Thank you! 🙂

Sorry but the issue here is power and freedom, not happiness. Yes, we may be "happier" with foreign aid, but we are definitely not more free, much less in control of our affairs.

You're welcome, and thank you for watching! 😊

Are you referring to neocolonialism? In what way?

Indeed.

Yes, that's what postmodernists believe.

@@languageandideas I agree with them

Sure, if you think that's good for you.

no

@@x16881 That's true for you not for me

😔

You welcome, and thank you for watching! 😊

Post structuralist always try to establish multiple meaning and rejects that there is a single meaning for a word, then how is it possible that post-structuralist accept many meaning to a single word, if that so Post structutalist are only the critics of single meaning and not the proposer for multiple meaning Am i right??

Thanks for that enlightening comment! 🙂

Really?! Mill is an interesting philosopher! Which of his ideas do you find the most interesting? We're happy you liked our Robin Hood example. Thank you! 🙂

Glad that you enjoyed the video. Thank you too for watching! 😊

Yes, science only describes (or, more accurately, "explain" through its causes) the universe. Philosophy and religion, on the other hand though, try to explain it. And yes, though to be more accurate, humanism promotes scientism. Thank you for your insightful comments! 🙂

Thank you too for watching! 🙂

I agree. 😔

I'm Language and Ideas. 🙂💡

Thank you so much @jackcarney313!

You're welcome! Thank you too for watching! 🙂

I couldn't agree more! Good luck with your French learning! 🙂

You're welcome, and thank you for watching our video! 🙂

Hello! Thanks for dropping a comment! 🙂

I agree, that integrated knowledge would become part of the person herself (how she sees the world, behaves, etc.). What specific schemas would you want to "prime"?

@@languageandideas I meant the psychological process of _priming_ . The lesson first learned, evaluated and later successfully applied, digs in unfathomable deep and is nearly impossible to delete or alter. Not even psychoanalytic work or therapy can really do something against patterns of thinking under the aegis ☔ of _priming_ . Mostly these patterns harshly get defended and/or grow to a practice of obsession. For example austerity. Being in need of a hyperclean apartment. The fear of lack for recognition . . . and so on and so on. _Priming_ in certain, maybe many cases tends towards psychopatholgy. Compulsive behaviour, violence and has myriads of facets. All these things and thinks we are unable to change so to say, even though knowing these are harmful if not even destructive to a frictionless societal involvement or integration. Thanks for asking.

Thank you so much! 😊

Thank you so much! 😊

Thank you so much! 😊

People today are too easily manipulated by "token economy".

Thank you too @chimotte for watching! 🙂

I agree. 😔

💯

I guess the politicians forgot that ethics/morality is what keeps society from chaos (way before the laws they make), and thus should be considered very important and taught everywhere (like advertisements).

@@languageandideas maybe also people's awareness should get increased about the contradictory nature of many ethical and moral standards. There is no solution in pushing dysfunctional paradigms without showing the limits of these. This is what I call enlightenment. And not this boring and dangerous pro and contra positioning.

I agree, @farrider3339. Also, the government should've regulated the pricing (even the discovery/invention) of such drug (from such a dangerous element).

@@languageandideas agree. Regulation. Now imagine it is a prototype medicine which has proven it's effectiveness. Days to go till the person dies. Then what ? Wait till legislation is ready ? I can only hope never getting confronted with such a situation. Along the edges of moral and ethics one has to look and discuss the grey zones, as to bring light to these. But people love to wrangle around uncomfortable issues, sad.

Thank you! 🙂 I get them online, from website articles to other KZfaq videos.

@@languageandideas Ahh okay! If you don't mind, is it possible to know which ones exactly?