10 Most Powerful Anti-Tank Guided Missile Systems in the World

Рет қаралды 618,539

Күн бұрын

► More Military videos on ‘THE BUZZ’: • 10 Most Powerful Howit...
Video Information:
 An anti-tank guided missile (ATGM), anti-tank missile, anti-tank guided weapon (ATGW) or anti-armor guided weapon is a guided missile primarily designed to hit and destroy heavily armored military vehicles. ATGMs range in size from shoulder-launched weapons, which can be transported by a single soldier, to larger tripod-mounted weapons, which require a squad or team to transport and fire, to vehicle and aircraft mounted missile systems.
 The introduction to the modern battlefield of smaller, man-portable ATGMs with larger warheads has given infantry the ability to defeat light and medium tanks at great ranges, though main battle tanks (MBTs) using composite and reactive armors have proven to be resistant to smaller ATGMs. Earlier infantry anti-tank weapons, such as anti-tank rifles, anti-tank rockets and magnetic anti-tank mines, had limited armor-penetration abilities or required a soldier to approach the target closely. As of 2016, ATGMs were used by over 130 countries and many non-state actors around the world.
 In this video, we present you guys the top 10 Anti-Tank Guided Missiles in the World today.
Enjoy watching. Cheers!
Credits:
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/
www.military-today.com/
www.army-technology.com/
www.militaryfactory.com/
www.turbosquid.com/
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these pictures and videos. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com

Пікірлер: 1 000

@adventuressurvivalinthailand 3 жыл бұрын

The problem with these lists is that they don't compare weights. That's the most crucial comparison. It's like boxing weight categories. You cannot compare a 20kg missile that a man can carry to a 40kg missile that must be mounted on a vehicle or at least a massive tripod operated by 2 men.

@Pepsi-Mann21 2 жыл бұрын

Exactly, you can't compare a lightweight man-portable missile to a helicopter launched missile.

@thethinking1 2 жыл бұрын

i was asking the mobility question myself, there...

@mcblaze1968 2 жыл бұрын

There needs to be two lists. Man portable and vehicle mounted.

@22steve5150 2 жыл бұрын

it should be 2 lists, one for primarily man-portable missiles and one for primarily vehicle mounted missiles.

@drxym 2 жыл бұрын

Weight, durability, ease of use, reliability, accuracy, setup/teardown, cost, effectiveness etc. Anyway this video is just a crappy top ten list just shoved out there as click bait.

@SonicTheAngel 2 жыл бұрын

StugnaP would disagree, + some important factors like overhead explosion capability & remote control from cover dosnt seem to be taken into account at all.

@immaestro87 2 жыл бұрын

it can destroy ka-52)))

@SonicTheAngel 2 жыл бұрын

@@immaestro87 yea seen it it's class :D

@anngoclepham2966 Жыл бұрын

@@immaestro87 :)) every things that have 5kg of he war head can take down even a fighter or attacker , not to mention the attack helicopter as ah64, ka52... can only with stand against 20mm :))

@n1n249 4 жыл бұрын

Kornet EM range 8km :) and where is 9K121 Vikhr , 9M120 Ataka. or 9M123 Khrizantema ?

@H88fayyad 4 жыл бұрын

this channel is just american propaganda

@generalowkenobi 4 жыл бұрын

Digo lo mismo . El Kornet esta entre los 100 mts y 6 km y tal vez mas. El hellfire no es armamento de mano y no entra en esta categoria.

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

@@H88fayyad why? Laser guided and ir guided can be fooled by thick smoke. Radar guided hellfire longbows cant be. OOF

@H88fayyad 4 жыл бұрын

@@irseeker9989 look at the original comment that i replied to and youll see those missiles thqt were not included, also helfire longbow is easy to fool with aerosol dispensers

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

@@H88fayyad your claim, your proof

@Itachi951000 2 жыл бұрын

I am sorry but the MMP is a more advanced anti-tank missile than nearly all of the stuff ranked above it. The narration about it in the video just doesn't do justice to its actual specs. It wasn't solely meant to replace the Milan but the Javelin as well which is in use in the French armed forces. The missile and its guidance system offer three different operating modes: - Fire-and-Forget (like the Javelin) - Man In The Loop with fibre optic data-link - Lock-on after launch (LOAL) for non-line-of-sight (NLOS) and using third party target designation. The MMP can literally destroy an invisible target behind a building or a hill and the locked target can be changed while the missile is in flight. It is the first and only 5th-generation anti-tank portable missile in service right now.

@emirhattab9987 3 жыл бұрын

the Bgm - Tow looks like a Monster on the tripod- but my favorite is the UMTAS.

@mcblaze1968 2 жыл бұрын

Javelin is putting in some work in Ukraine, as well as NLAW, which should be on this list.

@joshuaanagbonu1339 2 жыл бұрын

Are you very sure, kindly do a personal search and stop focusing on what the Western Media tell you

@menlay2k 2 жыл бұрын

@@joshuaanagbonu1339 stop focusing on what the russian's media tell u

@rimbooo3168 2 жыл бұрын

@@joshuaanagbonu1339 north korean media better then Russian media🤣🤣🤣🤣

@TheChillimouse 2 жыл бұрын

so far 300 launches 280 confirmed kills 93% success rate

@supremearcher9398 2 жыл бұрын

@@joshuaanagbonu1339 It seems you can only do your research when it comes to good things about the US.

@deniscicic8074 4 жыл бұрын

Kornet-EM, Upgraded Kornet ATGM with laser beam riding guidance system and a range of 8 or 10 km. There are two different missiles. A standard anti-tank missile with tandem HEAT warhead has a range of 8 km. It penetrates 1 100-1 300 mm behind ERA. The second missile has a thermobaric warhead and a range of 10 km.

@harrystachowiak7014 4 жыл бұрын

Richtig Kornet EM hat eine effektive Reichweite von 10 Km. In Video ist eine Falsche Reichweite gesagt worden. Und die Neuste Russische Panzerabwehrrakete ist Hermes mit einer Reichweite von 32 km wurde in Syrien getestet . Es würde auch die Lenkung Falsch gesagt. Radar und Laser Feuern und vergessen.

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

Just disturb the laser with smoke to wreck the missile off the path, tandem heat penetration can be ruined cause behind era tests were not made on the usa era, and trophy can fuck kornet. Theres a video of it.

@deniscicic8074 4 жыл бұрын

@@irseeker9989 Trophy is good, that's why special strategy is needed to defeat it, and one missile alone will not do the trick. There is constant tech and strategy battle between defense and offense. Every defense can be defeated with some strategy and every offense can be stopped with certain startegy ...

@TsapaSubarik 3 жыл бұрын

1 км корнет...вы ошиблись. корнет летит намного дальше и может бить дуплетом.

@TsapaSubarik 3 жыл бұрын

@@irseeker9989 лучь лазера направляется не в цель, а над нею. выстрел дублетом невилирует возможности трофи

@floraafrin6330 2 жыл бұрын

Umtas is so powerful. It is the next option of Bangladesh

@liverpoolscottish6430 2 жыл бұрын

Ridiculous to omit NLAW from this list- due to it's portability and sheer versatility it's a world class system. It's currently malleting Russian MBT's in Ukraine.

@jwb1227 2 жыл бұрын

NLAW is better suited for in-city fighting. In an open battlefield, NLAW is not as good as other portable ATGMs like the Javelin or the Israel's SPIKE because it lacks the longer range of other ATGMs. NLAW is a short-range ATGM and the operator must be closer to the target. It also lags in penetration of armor thickness. NLAW is 500+mm while Javelin is 800+mm.

@vonnikon 2 жыл бұрын

@@jwb1227 are there any tanks with more than 500mm armor above the top turret where the NLAW strikes?

@jwb1227 2 жыл бұрын

@@vonnikon - Yes and No is the answer. The "xxxmm" armor stats on tank data are for "guidance only" these days and cannot be relied on if anyone's life is on the line due to increased use of composite armor in addition to RHA which is what all ATGMs are rated at. For Leopard 2A6, "920-940 mm RHAe on the turret, 620 mm RHAe on the glacis and lower front hull on the Leopard 2A6." Now, NLAW was most likely designed for Soviet era tanks which it can easily take out but with increased use of composite armor, you want the most lethality level since you may only get one shot. Do you want only 500+mm penetration or 800+mm penetration for your ATGM? I want the bigger missile that has the longest effective range possible since I want a "stand-off" weapon that I can stay as far away from any tanks I am aiming at. My point is that when a person is asked to go into a battle and fire an ATGM at an enemy vehicle, you want the most lethality as possible since you may only get one single shot. Sometimes, the direct attack is the only option and 500mm RHA penetration is not enough. Additionally, tank technology is always being upgraded so you want to start with the most lethality for ATGM design since it may not be "upgraded" until much later.

@JonathanHStone 2 жыл бұрын

technically, the NLAW isn't guided. Its targetting uses a predictive model and proximity sensor. I'm not saying it oughtn't to be included on this list, only why it may have been.

@vonnikon 2 жыл бұрын

@@JonathanHStone it has guidance software to make it fly according to the predictive model. This is a feature. It is what allows it to be fire-and-forget.

@tigrecito48 2 жыл бұрын

3:35 a length of 1300 metres... now that is a BIG MISSILE! As soon as you fire it, it instantly hits the target! lol

@IC-lz3of 2 жыл бұрын

The French like stuff to be long: Eiffel tower, baguette, ATGM...

@tigrecito48 2 жыл бұрын

@@IC-lz3of they also like having long egos

@karlrasur8356 2 жыл бұрын

yea but hes meaning the cornet. its mention in the video with " 1.210m"

@jojobojer9543 Жыл бұрын

its the shit system from america mixed with metric system... (. instead of ,)

@GegeDxD Жыл бұрын

what you said doesn't make any sense. 1.3m is 1300mm 🤦🏻‍♂️

@rafalef42 4 жыл бұрын

And where is the Brimstone?

@rewind12354 3 жыл бұрын

The brimstone is fired from a plane these are shoulder fired missiles.

@livingcorpse5664 3 жыл бұрын

@@rewind12354 But this list has the Hellfire on it, which is mostly fired from helicopters. Heck the Brimstone is pretty much a British Hellfire that has been improved upon.

@sundancer06 4 жыл бұрын

there is a "OMTAS" anti tank guided missile variety of turkey besides UMTAS

@FLORATOSOTHON 2 жыл бұрын

Your range data on the Kornet is wrong. The maximum range of the Kornet is 5500 meters and for the Kornet EM is given as 10000 meters. Also the data presented for the SPIKE is for the MR and LR variants. However the newer variants MR2 and LR2 have increased ranges of 3000 and 5000 meters respectively. The SPIKE LR2 has a range of 10000 meters with fiber optic guidance and 16000 meters for air launched with data link guidance. Its length is 1.7 meters. there is also SPIKE NLOS with a max range of 32000 meters.

@aleksandarstix3097 3 ай бұрын

ALAS SERBIA 25km

@FLORATOSOTHON 3 ай бұрын

@@aleksandarstix3097 It is a good system but at least in the original version had cable guidance, that make it problematic especially over water, at such distances. I don't now if there is a newer version with data link RF guidance.

@eitan71 2 жыл бұрын

Spike NLOS - 32km Spike UR - 25km no exposure to the attacker. as much as i love the American tools and weapons, i think it says a lot if the U.S. is about to replace their really great Hellfire with these Spike models.

@abvgd82 3 жыл бұрын

How about Khrizantema, from what I've seen it seems to be pretty good going though armour?

@jorgetrincheira2120 2 жыл бұрын

The french missiles are the only allowing a visual targeting. Soldiers can attack hidden targets or switch the target if they see a more interesting one !

@remydaitch9815 2 жыл бұрын

What about the Jav?

@jorgetrincheira2120 2 жыл бұрын

@@remydaitch9815 Javelin is infrared guided . So the target must be spotted. the MMP has a camera . The operator can see new targets after launching the missile and can choose which target he will lock check this video kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fdybgN1hvZzRf6M.html

@jorgetrincheira2120 2 жыл бұрын

@@remydaitch9815 this video ranks MMP in first position and explains its advantages . kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g7uieqyk3uCblXU.html

@Eladio803 3 жыл бұрын

The 1 position is not correct. The Spike-NLOS (25 km range) is superior to Hellfiere II

@ParallelComparison 2 жыл бұрын

Exactly

@b2tall239 4 жыл бұрын

No love for the legendary Molotov Cocktail?? :-)

@b2tall239 4 жыл бұрын

@Durell Dailey It is when it's thrown!

3 жыл бұрын

Lol. It burns your tank engine to death 😂

@rcheek207 3 жыл бұрын

stick with cars

@b2tall239 3 жыл бұрын

@@rcheek207 Huh?

@zamilhasan4299 3 жыл бұрын

I was expecting British Brimstone in the top list

@theprogressivecynic2407 2 жыл бұрын

This list is kind of hard to judge, as a lot of these systems serve a completely different role, or have some unique aspect that makes them better or worse for a given situation. For example, the Spike is notoriously lethal for its ability to fire indirectly, making it impossible for most enemies to fight back--effectively, the Spike is fired diagonally up, in the general direction of the target, and the user can lock on to the target once it reaches altitude. This means that it fired without line of sight, which renders most tanks incapable of targeting the user, even if they can detect where they fired from. Also, this list mixes super-long range systems like the PARS-3 and Lahat, with shorter range systems like the BGM-71 and Kornet, when these are just used for different things. In urban combat, a system can be lighter and much shorter ranged, yet be much more effective than a longer ranged system that is heavier and less maneuverable. Of course, in an open area, like a highway through cover, the longer range system is far superior.

@bradrum1 2 жыл бұрын

Well said. spike sounds incredible. Many of the weapons are very different from one another, not better or worse.

@GegeDxD Жыл бұрын

Don't u see the poster is biased and spread fake propaganda?

@kadirokandakibayrasimkolan5358 3 жыл бұрын

Turkish missile UMTAZ LUMTAZ MIZRAK MAM L termobarik boms turkish drons attack very good

@sameerthakur720 4 жыл бұрын

Brimstone is better than Hellfire. Longer range and also capable of being launched by fast fixed wing aircraft. Russian helicopter mounted missiles are ignored. An antique like TOW is so high up in the ranking. Then Konkurs, Milan and HOT should have been included too.

@praveenranndika5083 2 жыл бұрын

40km -60km range but but warhead smaller than helfire.

@selahattincan7665 2 жыл бұрын

The best one is Umtas from Turkey

@wayneprice2737 2 жыл бұрын

What about the uks brimstone missile one of the best missiles in the world.

@ChiefMac59 3 жыл бұрын

If Hellfire is so much better than Spike, why is the US buying Spike missiles for their helicopters? The Spike missile range is well over twice the range listed here

@saturnvmoon8592 3 жыл бұрын

How do you guys do this much research and miss so many top missles like brimstone radar guided and semi active laser 700mm armour penetration Air burst option

@55mikeburns 2 жыл бұрын

It's important to remember that these missiles have different niches. For example, missiles that have great range and armor penetration will be very big and heavy. Javelin has a much shorter range and less penetration but is man-portable, which changes the game entirely. IN urban warfare, a tank killer can be hiding in any building and lean out of any window and pop you. Do you know how that makes a tanker feel?

@OmegaMegalodon 2 жыл бұрын

though Javelin has less penetration, just fire 2 javelins on the same target instead of 1.

@zieo8218 2 жыл бұрын

@@OmegaMegalodon Javelins cost a quarter of a million dollars. Even in the United States a javelin team is only given one missile. In countries like Ukraine, where $250,000 will start adding up quick, they are used very sparingly.

@OmegaMegalodon 2 жыл бұрын

@@zieo8218 true enough...But in a war, if your javelin fails to penetrate an enemy bunker - you must fire the 2nd Javelin...you will not think of the costs, else the whole battalions rushing the enemy bunker will die.

@Senkino5o 2 жыл бұрын

None of these are supposed to be 'armor-piercing' rounds at all, they use HEAT and depleted uranium sabot rounds for that.

@StevenSmith-mk5fg 2 жыл бұрын

This is a Buzz video keep in mind. They just copy and past some basic info from Wiki

@Ms13unknown13 3 жыл бұрын

Kornet 1KM? Surely thats a mistake cause last I checked it was around 8-10km.

@maastomunkki 2 жыл бұрын

Well, the next missile was proclaimed to be 1300m long.. in my books, that, my friend, is a LONG ASS missile!

@Packer1290 3 жыл бұрын

They don't discuss the ability (or non-ability) of these systems to hit the top of the target they are shot at like I know the Javelin has. Seems like an important capability that could far offset any differences in actual "power".

@oprishubhai1415 2 жыл бұрын

Indian nag atgm has same ability as javline

@shermanpeabody6102 Жыл бұрын

China HJ-12 has top-down attack mode similar to Javelin.

@hooksknews6364 2 жыл бұрын

A missile length of 1300 meters, come on guys no way

@shashwats7960 2 жыл бұрын

1300mm or (1300 mili meters or 1.3 meters)

@Hamsta180 2 жыл бұрын

@@shashwats7960 She definitely said meters XD

@intisaber4984 2 жыл бұрын

what about the brimstone?

@The_Mig_Hunter 2 жыл бұрын

the 9M123 Khrizantema should be in the top 5 it is one of the best ATGM's in the world and deserves a spot on the podium

@robfer5370 2 жыл бұрын

I think you will find that the British Brimstone Missile is the best Anti-Tank Guided Missile Systems in the World, and you left it off your list....

@PassportToPimlico 2 жыл бұрын

Exactly. I live in Stevenage and so have met several people who worked on it. That and Storm Shadow.

@tuncbilek84 15 күн бұрын

Malesef listeye girmeyecek kadar kötü bir füzeymiş.

@ismailabdukadir1130 4 жыл бұрын

Probably the best 10 anti tanks currently but the ranking of the list can be disputable!....good video

@axlsane427 3 жыл бұрын

As always with The Buzz. The ranking is completely random.

@cttnk Жыл бұрын

Stugna have same characteristics as Kornet (it can use 152mm rocket too) but much more safely and usable for operator

@kendodd8734 2 жыл бұрын

List don’t seem to make sense as far as far as range and armour penetration is concerned it’s left me scratching me head as to what missile is the best at taking out an mbt

@randomdeadpool 4 жыл бұрын

The LAHAT can be fired from a tank´s gun (usually a Reihnmetall 120mm canon) Good video

@KUNALBISWAS-NEWS-TECH-SHORT 4 жыл бұрын

From DRDO Rifle 120mm as well.. ;)

@randomdeadpool 4 жыл бұрын

@@KUNALBISWAS-NEWS-TECH-SHORT Thanks for the info bro. I also read that you can shoot 3 at a time (from the tank's main gun, and targeting different targets) Really cool for a simple missile

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

@@randomdeadpool not ordinary 120mm. Its a smoothbore. Include always

@nuukas7717 4 жыл бұрын

Did you skip russia?

@Dogge444 3 жыл бұрын

@@qdoom3 nope russia is good weapon tech. US is shit tech thats why its so trash and not working

@rinharter7758 3 жыл бұрын

@@Dogge444 Lmao what??Just look at F-22 Raptor,B-2 Spirit,MQ-9 Reaper.They all are the most advanced military equipments right now,that all from the USA.While Russia only great at ballistic missile such as Sarmat,Iskander-E and Tochka.

@rayotoxi1509 3 жыл бұрын

@@rinharter7758 Bruh Look at real Kornet Stats it has 8 to 10KM Range and has 1000 to 1300mm RHA Penn AFTER ERA One Hit with that thing and your Tank is Out of action and seeing a Small ATGM launcher at 8km even with thermals is Hard and it probly wont happend Before you got hit Unless you have Laser warning recivers but the gunner of the ATGM could just not aim at you and only aim at you when the missile is closer giving you less time to React

@rewind12354 3 жыл бұрын

Tbh I thought the Kornet specs didn’t seem right.

@Dtults 3 жыл бұрын

@@Dogge444 then explain to me why America is the strongest Military force on the planet, you cant believe everything that you see on the internet

@egilkarlson7253 2 жыл бұрын

No brimstone?

@danielsell2844 2 жыл бұрын

This list makes no sense comparing manpads and vehicle launched missles makes as much sense as being surprised a 50 cal rifle has more stopping power than a pistol

@user-ee3le4tl1z 4 жыл бұрын

SPIKE have types of products : SPIKE 200, 250, mini, SPIKE DALILAH, TAMUZ , SPIKE SR, MR, LR , ER, NLOS.

@SomethingLegit1 3 жыл бұрын

Delilah isn't from the SPIKE family. SPIKE is Rafael's branch of production, while Delilah is an IMI (תעש) munition. TAMUZ is the Hebrew name for SPIKE NLOS.

@johnsilver9338 2 жыл бұрын

SPIKE NLOS as no 1 as it can reach more than 20km. BRIMSTONE too especially the II and III version. Another one of Israel is NIMROD.

@madmax6007 4 жыл бұрын

Wow! Magnificent chart! Im impatiently waiting for the SAM's chart so i hope to see where the strela2 and the stinger are positioned! Compliments! Good job!

@martinhagberg3477 4 жыл бұрын

And what about the Swedish Bofors Anti-tank missel ? miss it

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

Hey swede, thats trash

@welshdefenceforces 3 жыл бұрын

Yes, where Is the AT4

@Daniel-jg8ff 3 жыл бұрын

@@irseeker9989 Is it now? When Sweden had BILL and BILL 2 US Had... NON top attack atgm. BILL were the first missile in the world with that capability

@irseeker9989 3 жыл бұрын

@@Daniel-jg8ff you wanna know something? Welcome to 2021 when your army isnt the best in world😂😂😂

@bengtmowitz5012 2 жыл бұрын

And where is the NLAW? Joint venture of Saab Bofors and the UK.

@user-sw9ih2ob6w 3 жыл бұрын

Most combat proven is the spike ,and hellfire .

@Daniel-jg8ff 3 жыл бұрын

@TaurusBeast666 Жыл бұрын

No, not. Kornet Is.

@mrkaya6119 4 жыл бұрын

UMTAS 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷👍👍

@tgsgardenmaintenance4627 2 жыл бұрын

How does Brimstone stack up against Hellfire from which it was derived?

@MostlyPennyCat 2 жыл бұрын

It's the same shape but completely different. _completely_ Designed to destroy massed tanks you could for up to 24 in a volley and they'll figure it out themselves, choose targets, identify the vehicles, choose the weakest parts, hit in sequence, avoid friendlies and self destruct if not safe to hit. With a 60km range from a fast jet. Mid course correction from any other source too. And can just do laser guided is you like. They are very scary indeed.

@MostlyPennyCat 2 жыл бұрын

And at Number 00, MBDA Brimstone.

@BMW-vs6iq 3 жыл бұрын

UMTAŞ

@LooxJJ 2 жыл бұрын

Beauty of AGM-114 is in its flexibility and ingenuity of the design - and its incredible compatibility with the support infrastructures and systems. As of 2022, It still is about a couple decades ahead of its competitors.

@riskinhos 2 жыл бұрын

not really. laser guidance is shit AF.

@BenyKarachun 2 жыл бұрын

Is that why the US bought the Spike NLOS for their Apaches?

@LooxJJ 2 жыл бұрын

@@BenyKarachun Spike is an interim solution until AGM-179 JAGM is fully developed. Meanwhile, AGM-114 is expected to be in service until 2035 and beyond.

@BenyKarachun 2 жыл бұрын

@@LooxJJ JAGM still doesn't have the manual guidance capability the Spike has, the missile needs a complete overhaul to gain that capability.

@LooxJJ 2 жыл бұрын

@@BenyKarachun JAGM isn't even fully deployed yet - development life cycle is expected to be about 30 years (Hellfire life cycle was originally 20 years, but now is approaching almost 40 years).

@newottomanempire5847 2 жыл бұрын

💪❤🇹🇷 UMTAS 🇹🇷❤💪 Of course, since this is an American channel, it broadcasts biased. umtas cutting edge technology in 2020 and a very effective rocket launch target has no chance Discard the features, forget it, cancel it, change the target, you can hit the target from anywhere, the tandem head, multi-featured option, if you hit a tank, that tank is destroyed, it just can't act as a tank again.

@davidryanlawrencd 3 жыл бұрын

Uh what about the 9K121 Vikhir missile? 10km range, 1000mm of pen + tandem, proxy fuse against aircraft

@russiandispenser8482 4 жыл бұрын

You put most powerful ATGM at 9th spot... Hellfire is good but not as good as people think it is, also some other Russian ATGMs are missing, like Ataka, Svir (Reflex) and many more...

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

Hellfire is better than you thing. Radar guided, fire and forget, top down attack possible also able to engage air targets, t-14's hardkill nor softkill can defeat it. Sorry, its the best. Kornet, vikhr, kh25ml other shit on other hand gets intercepted by trophys

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

tank commander can deploy laser proof smoke and that can defeat the kornet alone. If theyre lazy, the trophy kills it for you. Bye. Theres video of that happening also.

@nicolasgiroff550 3 жыл бұрын

IR Seeker sure.... the smoke did nothing for the merkava 4 at lebanon

@irseeker9989 3 жыл бұрын

@tron u can have hellfires on top of humwees tho

@irseeker9989 3 жыл бұрын

Enough portabl?

@Baack2black 3 жыл бұрын

How on earth no Korean" raybolt" in the video!?

@mitri5389 3 жыл бұрын

whats a korea? samsuk trash?

@redding4540 2 жыл бұрын

@@mitri5389 Samsung and SK are the biggest D-Ram suppliers (over 70% of world's D-Ram memory market) in the world, every I-Phones or android phones have Samsung parts in it, LG is the biggest manufacturer for the appliances, SK ranks #4 in the world for arm's export (tanks, aircrafts, etc), SK has #1 ship manufacturers in terms of numbers and profits, LG supplies most of the Tesla batteries in China, and Hyundai/Kia tops as #4 automakers in the world...Burj Khalifa + Twin Tower + Taipei 101 buildings are constructed by SK. How South Korea is irrelevant when it is chosen for most innovative country as well as #3 exporter in the world? you should check their total GDP in 2021.

@mitri5389 2 жыл бұрын

@@redding4540 cool they can make some cheap stuff

@redding4540 2 жыл бұрын

@@mitri5389 expensive than your mom

@mitri5389 2 жыл бұрын

@@redding4540 you ever seen a samsuk fridge or seen how bad they make kia Hyundai. all nice on the outside but total trash in design and materials inside. honestly a westernized china in quality and ethics.

@micheal6898 2 жыл бұрын

brimstone missles are replacing the hellfires ?

@nicholaschristodoulou5766 2 жыл бұрын

Where's the brimstone ??

@bigman-adv 2 жыл бұрын

The most dangerous anti tank missile is the Spike due to its intelligent non line of sight loitering capabilities. It is so good that US Army tested it on Apaches instead of the Hell fires, which expose the helicopter to SAM and other threats. An operator of Spike can fire the missile, watch for enemies from above and then pick a target on the fly. Penetration is not relevant if the enemy is hiding behind cover and you can't lock on it (e.g. as the case with older gen missiles - Javelin/Kornet/etc.).

@marktepper3440 2 жыл бұрын

I wish the Germans would gaie the Ukrainians their Spike missile inventory.

@bigman-adv 2 жыл бұрын

@@marktepper3440 I understand this very well, but Putin will light the middle east on fire if Israel supplies weapons and the spike is a game changer. It's a complex and dangerous situation. Putin is a bully that's looking for a reason to fight. Israel is walking in a political mine field.

@Mishkafofer 2 жыл бұрын

@@marktepper3440 they cant. The contract allow only sale to Nato countries.

@Marco-tb1uj 2 жыл бұрын

If there Is any kind of trasmissione ongoing between the missile and the platform, then you're giving your position away ti any decent military

@bigman-adv 2 жыл бұрын

@@Marco-tb1uj Systems like Trophy detect any incoming threat, using a radar, and immediately point out that position on a digital map. Detection by radio signal transmission doesn't matter, the missile with or without transmission is detected.

@jameszack7158 3 жыл бұрын

Seems Turkish UMTAS missile is the winner because it has the best effective range + armor penetration value.

@Nicolay406 3 жыл бұрын

Ummm Israeli SPIKE has a range of 25 km. Also what is the penetration value of UMTAS? For all I read both use HEAT warheads.

@jameszack7158 3 жыл бұрын

@@Nicolay406 SPIKE range + armor penetration: 8000 + 900 = 8900 UMTAS range + armor penetration: 8000 + 1000 = 9000 Therefore UMTAS seems to be superior according to this video.

@Nicolay406 3 жыл бұрын

@@jameszack7158 Spike ER's penetration is actually 1000 too (according to wikipedia), but there's a new version of Spike ER, and it has a rage of 16 km. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spike_(missile)

@zvijezdicam9188 2 жыл бұрын

@@jameszack7158 L Umtas 16 km

@BenyKarachun 2 жыл бұрын

It's not only stupid to do that math, it's also wrong. Spike NLOS has 32km maximum range and can penetrate well over 1.5 meters of armor.

@hazlinabdulhamid7461 2 жыл бұрын

Malaysia is watching..✌️😊✌️🇲🇾

@Zonker66 2 жыл бұрын

Been researching anti-tank systems recently because they're among the most helpful weapons the rest of the world can supply Ukraine with without starting WW3. The systems seem incredibly useful to infantry units... size and weight are vital... you just ignore that? NLAWs also keep coming up in my research and you disregard them completely.

@emorelix 2 жыл бұрын

Ukraine has the Stugna-P. Which they actually MAKE in Ukraine. Also this video is crap, half the missiles it talks about are bunker busters.

@Zonker66 2 жыл бұрын

@@emorelix Hope the Stugna-P is amazing. Hope that courage isn't sacrificed. Hell of a new century.

@garethjohnstone8662 2 жыл бұрын

Because 'murica!

@MsZaneman 2 жыл бұрын

The NLAW is incredibly effective in the roll it was designed for, but that role is not exactly the roll of a true 'ATGM'. It's (practically speaking) more of an upgraded AT4/SMAW in terms of capabilities, compared to the capabilities of the ATGMs on this list (range is less than 1km, no target tracking, etc...). The NLAWs flight path data is loaded into the missile before firing, then the missile follows that flight path without deviation. It cannot update trajectory if the target changes direction or speed, like everything else on this list.

@InnokentyLittle 2 жыл бұрын

@@Zonker66 The Stugna copes well with its task - it destroys targets at distances from 500 meters. NLAW is very good at close range. Recommended by the Ukrainian army.

@BenyKarachun 2 жыл бұрын

Spike NLOS - 32 kilometers maximum range. The US recently purchased these to their Apache helicopters.

@praveenranndika5083 2 жыл бұрын

British brimstone 40km to 60km...

@BenyKarachun 2 жыл бұрын

@@praveenranndika5083 Yeah, the difference is that from that range, it's dependent on target designation, whereas the Spike NLOS doesn't need it, as it's guided by camera. That's a huge advantage. For example, Brimstone can't engage target behind a mountain, Spike NLOS can.

@BenyKarachun 2 жыл бұрын

@@praveenranndika5083 Basically, the advantage of the Spike NLOS isn't really the range, it's the loitering capability.You could have 1000km range, if the target is behind a wall you won't hit it. Spike NLOS can be manually guided to hit the tank.

@aveit6755 Жыл бұрын

@@BenyKarachun Brimstone can autonomously search for detect, classify and engage a target using its Millimetric Wave radar. Missiles will even data link to each other to ensure that they each engage a different target. This means that like Spike Brimstone can be launched without the need for line of sight but it also has an advantage in that it isn't effected by weather or smoke due the use of radar for guidance and can be fired in salvos to engage many targets simultaneously from a single platform.

@BenyKarachun Жыл бұрын

@@aveit6755 Yeah man, good luck using that radar to fire on people with ATGMs or MANPADs or a mortar squad, good luck differentiating between an MLRS and just a normal truck. Good luck hitting a control tower, a barracks, etc. You can't control it to hit something specific, it's a massive disadvantage. Weather isn't really a factor. Spike NLOS can also engage targets simultaneously.

@rhodium1096 2 жыл бұрын

I have seen a Kornet destroyed an Abrams tank in Yemen while a Tow missile failed to destroy a T-90 in Syria..😃

@rhodium1096 2 жыл бұрын

@@perakojotgenije Also Turkish leopard 2

@mobjectivems7652 2 жыл бұрын

Israeli Spike and Nag ATGM (laser guided model of wired Tow) are currently the best ones in the market…..

@abshekprasad 6 ай бұрын

Nag/Helina deserved to be on this list.

@BowToWard86 2 жыл бұрын

AGM-65 Maverick: "What am I? Chopped liver?"

@TheWerner182 3 жыл бұрын

You forgot the South african ZT-6 Mokopa . missile length 1.9m Range of 10km penetration of 1350mm RHA

@PuffAdder8565 2 жыл бұрын

it's not battlefield proven.

@supremearcher9398 2 жыл бұрын

@@PuffAdder8565 if that's the criteria then the Chinese missile shouldn't be there.

@hoperp1951 2 жыл бұрын

Wow..... " the MMP has a length of 1300 metres"..... Takes 300 soldiers to carry the damn thing

@Solveig.Tissot Жыл бұрын

Average Virgin Cringe Brainless Fatherless Anti France Troll Fanboy taking Copium over here ⬆️

@papaschlumpf5894 3 жыл бұрын

I don't understand the rating system. Missiles that are behind in every single aspect (range, penetration, speed...) are rated higher than other ones with better stats. Even the guidance system's advantages or disadvantages (fire and forget capable, multiple sensors...) don't seem to count.

@dododadabi2225 2 жыл бұрын

Its a youtube channel. I am glad i got an overview of systems similiar to the javelin. I knew it can not be that unique anymore.

@VeChainStacks 2 жыл бұрын

Always funny when Chinese gear looks exactly like the US version.

@JOESMITH-qs8ue 2 жыл бұрын

Not to mention the name being in English.

@russelfang7434 2 жыл бұрын

Yes the HJ12 was basically a copy of Javelin with enhanced firepower up to 1100mm.

@scorpioraptor 3 жыл бұрын

1-Spike 2-Umtas 3- Javelin 4- Kornet Hefire for hellcopters?!?!

@chetanroychoudhury3941 4 жыл бұрын

Still you missed carl gustav of sweden which can destroy tanks,armoured vehicle,bunkar etc.

@johannestetzelivonrosador7317 4 жыл бұрын

It's not a missile it's a rocket propelled grenade similar to the RPG-7

@egileigengrau6637 2 жыл бұрын

Briefly glanced at the thumbnail and thought this was about light-sabers . . Time for bed I guess.

@morhafjamal7451 4 жыл бұрын

Kornet range 5 to 8_10 km according to which virgin used

@007floppyboy 3 жыл бұрын

hope that bird made it out alive at 10:46

@harry000 4 жыл бұрын

Kornet is K I N G ask the operators in the Levant

@mauricecohen3830 2 жыл бұрын

The Trophy active defense system put an end to it. Not a single tank equiped with trophy has been lost.

@nice5557 2 жыл бұрын

It is not obvious how you calculate the score of a missile and why you omitted Sweden NLAW. In the end, I see a mix of missiles each developed for different combat conditions.

@hasanhuseyin9990 3 жыл бұрын

Turkish... OMTAS UMTAS L-UMTAS.

@victoriapruitt1209 2 жыл бұрын

The Tow is likely the oldest missile in this list.

@cergeil1805 4 жыл бұрын

Корнет дальность эффективной стрельбы 8-10км. В зависимости от ракеты.

@PuffAdder8565 2 жыл бұрын

The thing about the cornet is that it is damage at all costs, whilst the contest is accuracy at all costs. After 1 kilometer, the cornet has accuracy issues that may result in a miss due to its design. It is still the most damaging antitank rocket out there though. It could one hit kill any tank with a solid hit on most spots.

@TsapaSubarik 2 жыл бұрын

мы их танки РСЗОшками вскроем. Переносные ПТРК на всякий случай, партизанить... 😁

@remydaitch9815 2 жыл бұрын

No distinction between vehicle borne, copter borne, and carriable. Not an apples-to-apples comparison.

@intisaber4984 2 жыл бұрын

The Pars 3 LR was never used by britain, it pulled out of the project

@heyhoe168 3 жыл бұрын

You should place air-to-ground and ground-to-ground missiles in different categories.

@TranquilTravelz 4 жыл бұрын

UMTAS anti-tank guided missile has a range of 8km and u guys keep it the 6th most powerful one ?

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

Yes

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

Range is not only factor

@turkishempire1071 4 жыл бұрын

@@irseeker9989 Turkish made Umtas Penetration 1000mm of RHA from 8km Israeli mad Spike 900mm RHA from 2,5km/4km/8km ...

@TranquilTravelz 3 жыл бұрын

@@turkishempire1071 😉

@BenyKarachun 2 жыл бұрын

Spike 5th generation has 4km/12km/16km/32km range Also, the penetration is well over 1 meter and even 1.5 meters in case of Spike NLOS

@vickykrish95 3 жыл бұрын

what about NAG and Helina anti tank guided missile of India, it has range of 8-10 km with penetration of 1000 mm of RHA.

@anuradhachibber7364 3 жыл бұрын

Yes

@supravatsarkar4090 3 жыл бұрын

Yes

@prakharmaheshwari510 3 жыл бұрын

Biased list surely. They excluded russian missiles too

@scottymsu6063 2 жыл бұрын

NLAW should be in there and should be one of the top top

@jureeratpholseela7508 2 жыл бұрын

no, it is close range not the same type at all.

@mikeblac7298 3 жыл бұрын

Brimstone

@user-xx1yk5uc4r 4 жыл бұрын

Please you check South Korea missile system. All kind of missile system available. Very smart and powerful.

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

Hi, north korean! :)

@gawan7279 4 жыл бұрын

Great Video, good content, for next can you make video about Powerful Air-to-Surface Missile or Fastest and Longest Air-to-Suraface Missile platform launched from Aircraft Fighter and Attack Helicopter from Russia/Europe and USA, Great The Buzz 👍👍

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

Jassmer 900km range can be launched from hornets atleast

@nathanstone8450 2 жыл бұрын

5:17 into the video. Did you see the attack chopper? It looked like a real dragon

@mangkanor165 4 жыл бұрын

Kornet wipe out merkava 4 in Lebanon.

@tahir40 4 жыл бұрын

After or before IDF armed Merkavas with active defence systems?

@twakim 4 жыл бұрын

They had trophy... you can watch the videos

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

@@twakim google trophy intercepts kornet

@ChiefMac59 3 жыл бұрын

Israel was using Merkava 1s in Lebanon. The last dozen attempts by Kornet have be shot out of the sky without effect. Trophy negates Kornet 100% of the time

@Nicolay406 3 жыл бұрын

It didn't actually wipe out merkava since merkava's popruse was to save the soldiers while the tank is damaged. So yea, 0 tank casualties in the second Lebanon war.

@aleksandrrybin957 3 жыл бұрын

The firing range of "Kornet" high-explosive missiles is 10 km, cumulative missiles - 8 km.

@cttnk Жыл бұрын

It is a Russian fairytale

@1Invinc 2 жыл бұрын

Hang on. Just looking at the specs listed within the video itself, the Chinese HJ-12 has better stats than the US Javelin system. Why is it listed ranking lower? Is there some factor that I'm missing that makes the Javelin a more effective system?

@zenko247 2 жыл бұрын

STATS ARE BULLSHIT check out ACCUAL DATA about the NLAWS and Javelin from the Ukrainian Invasion FOOL

@ileria3 2 жыл бұрын

@@zenko247 China lies about their stats. and notice how they copied the Javelin to almost a T? China couldn't invent paper if they had too without stealing how to make it.

@zenko247 2 жыл бұрын

@@ileria3😂 I agree ( but ps China did invent paper🤣)

@ManFran3 6 ай бұрын

@3:36 "the MMP has a length of one thousand three hundred meters" - that's a really long device!

@vg245game5 4 жыл бұрын

UMTAS anti-tank guided missile has a range of 8km and u guys keep it the 6th most powerful one ? really?

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

Range is not only factor

@vg245game5 3 жыл бұрын

@@irseeker9989 so tell me if you know what factors

@pinakpanisaikia7522 4 жыл бұрын

Yes you forgot to mention India's indigenious NAG missile . Try to do more reasearch on it

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

Ew nag nag indian

@sagardyenchilwar8762 4 жыл бұрын

@@irseeker9989 Probably u don't have problem with nag atgm But instead with Indians ...

@shreyanshdubey5654 3 жыл бұрын

Indian jeeps with recoirless gun are very much to destroy any tank whose power world have seen in 1965

@irseeker9989 3 жыл бұрын

@@shreyanshdubey5654 nice joke an abrams has automatic target finding system all the way to 8km And will fire a fucking mpat shell up your stupid car

@zidan2488 3 жыл бұрын

Very poor

@vishalv7449 4 жыл бұрын

We wantTop 10 under development aircraft video

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

@rajatdani619 4 жыл бұрын

How come No 3 After no 5. And the 3 again!! And hey where is the brimstone! Since u include Agm114r hellfire II.

@rajatdani619 4 жыл бұрын

3:34 how is it even possible!! 😱😵

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

@@rajatdani619 she said meters

@roulette-bn3eb 4 жыл бұрын

You have very poor information about anti tanks missiles for example korent has range of 8m ..

@irseeker9989 4 жыл бұрын

@emosh73 ranges are used as nautical ones, nm Okay so first of all kornet can eb defeated with thick smoke launched from tanks, or by trophy, or by bad weather and anything else. Hellfire.. Not so. Radar guided, top down fire and forget, afganit aps cant defeat it. Bye

@Eri-zd6tt 3 жыл бұрын

@@irseeker9989 😕

@Eri-zd6tt 3 жыл бұрын

😂

@dankoj9314 2 жыл бұрын

@@irseeker9989 You're talking only about trofi effect! Russian military also make active protection sistem. It can destroy everything that is made by west military. Doesn't matter if it's fires from the ground or helicopter! Kornet is one of the best in the world, but there's newer version of atgm rockets ,for example the Hrizantema!