Yassssssss

and run like Hell. lol

Probably never won a case either..lol

Especially if you are a person of colour.

Just turn around and walk the Hell out. She won’t be teaching me!!

As they say justice may be delayed but its never denied. Why was the daddy trying to hide his rebel license plate. Hmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!

Its been happening to black folk for over 400 years.

Amen

She's a bitch! Good job 👏 making it even worst for your client. So glad all 3 was convicted now rot in jail for the rest of your life.

@@missyjaundoo6562 agreed 👏🏽👏🏽

😂😂👍🏿

Yes you see the judge looking at her like I can’t wait to get you out of my courtroom

True. I almost believe this woman and the other defense attorneys "threw this case. They didnt have much to work with AND they themselves quickly learned how VILE the two Mcmichaels are and how DUMB the Bryan guy is. Trust me, they dont like them anymore than i do but thats the downside of being a defense attorney in America-vile racist people are entitled to a defense.

You’re so right

Right she's terrible, but I think they had to pick some lawyers from the bottom of the barrel to defend them against a crime that they had confessed on camera and they had footage of their crime.

@Lisa von der Heiden, you are so right, their arrogance and contempt proved the judge's and prosecutor's point. The judge didn't even bother to order them to stand when they didn't, he knew what he was dealing with. Their arrogance, contempt and disrespect toward others is a major part of the reason they both got lwop + 20.

You should always respect Your Honor.They were given a fair trial and were found guilty.Man up and accept your punishment

I'm confused as I distinctly remember them standing at sentencing . I watched on Court tv. No the two mcmichaels are demons with no remorse whether standing or not. The other guy is DUMB as a box of rocks and a dumb racist who was dumb enough to chase and hit a black man with his car just because he saw two other yahoos doing it. He's remorseful and will have at least 30 years to think about "if id just stayed home and minded my business. Right They all got exactly what they deserved!!!

🤝🏽🗣facts and I have Caucasian friends I no racist 💯

Totally agree 👍

She is a disgrace

The audacity of her to even come back to court after such garbage closing is beyond me. She must have stinky breath!!🥶😱😨😭

@@javonnawinfield5187 the caucacity of her. Lol 😂

She is true definition of stupidity mix with idiocy with a license. 🥶🙉🙊🙈😱😰😓😭

She'll probably run as a candidate for the Republican Party at some point.

She's not a judge but there's plenty out there that are judges and are like her. If only they could all be rooted out

Don’t speak to soon. Agreed, she is horrible.

A great blessing 🙌 that she isn't but every JUDGE WAS A ATTORNEY FIRST. so hopefully she never runs to be a judge

😂 right

😂😂 thanks...right let's skip the technicals😂😂

@Terance Erving 😂🤣😂🤣, chicken flavor looks like 😂🤣😂

🤣🤣😂💯😊

She is a true shit talker. She must have stinky breath!!!!!

Yes, but not lady. Just be quiet. Moderation when you say you were doing a citizen's arrest. Stuff happens to many people in prison; some who are actually innocent.

😂😂💯

Thanks for pointing that out 🤔He is just done listening to her.

She was so damn boring and un compelling

Jackie Johnson and Gough actually have a history as well. Just read about that a few days ago.

Georgia law enforcement is among the most corrupt in the U.S. A lot of Georgia yahoos hate Northerners!! I worked there and had first hand experience.

She literally ruined her career with her repugnant vilification of Mr. Arbery. She had resign from a law professor position. She is now nationally known as not only a hideious human being but a very incompetent lawyer.

@Jody Schmuckatelli she is incompetent in her inability to recognize they committed a crime. She is still remorseless. Vile and probably incredibly racist.

@Jody Schmuckatelli She displayed a lack of morale when she mentioned Arbery’s toes. A young man had lost his life for goodness sake!! That may not make her incompetent, but it does make you sick that a lawyer would choose to say something like that regarding a dead man.

@Jody Schmuckatelli you are right.

When Ahmaud mother stated “had he known that he would be murder that day, he probably would have clipped his toenails and cleaned them”. My heart broke

I’m not defending Greg but she phrased that argument very poorly. It was a legitimate argument against the prosecutions story. Wearing timberlands with uncut tone nails is not indicative of a jogger. Neither is cargo shorts. Furthermore coming full sprint out of a construction site is not indicative of a jogger either. Seeing someone in a sprint gets people’s attention and especially when they’re not dressed for occasion. Anyone would be suspicious of his behavior as everyone who saw was. However, these men had no right to chase him down. They should have done what the other neighbors did and call the police. It’s not irrational to think he was up to no good. Can you honestly say you’ve seen people sprinting in timberlands for recreation? I can’t say I’ve ever seen someone sprint on the street for recreation. These facts along with his attire and tone nails don’t support the prosecutions narrative. His toenails should have have been brought up. The other facts were enough to sufficiently prove the point. None of it matters regardless. Even if he wasn’t a runner and he was scoping out the house it doesn’t make their actions justified. Why I believe it’s valid for the defense to bring it up is they were using the jogger narrative to give Arbrery innocent reason for running. Even though it legally doesn’t matter trials are not based on law alone. A large part is creating a narrative for jury. Many Americans think those who punish criminals are in the right regardless of whether the punishment was criminal. Therefore, the prosecution wanted jury to know Arbrery was not a criminal. (Note I don’t think he had bad intentions. He wouldn’t have been seen multiple times and not had a bag to carry his loot) These men were so worked up about this mysterious thief that when they saw a man sprinting they went into hunter/prey mode. They were like dogs chasing after someone that runs. It’s honestly easy for me to see where someone could act as Riddle did. With the months of buildup, neighbors screaming and pointing, man sprinting, and friends in pursuit he probably thought that was their guy. That doesn’t make it right but it’s easy to see how executive function shuts down and fight or flight is triggered. If you disagree with me, address my points before calling me names. I say that because many go straight to name calling. Also note I sympathize with all people who get caught up in crimes due to circumstances. Usually it’s black people I sympathize with the most. I don’t like it when society seeks to endlessly punish them instead of rehabilitate. Often can teach people to think about consequences of their actions, think about impact on others, and use CBT to increase executive function. The default mode network is just that our default. Little cognitive thought happens when in fight or flight. Amygdala takes over. We have to get people to default to use executive function and the prefrontal cortex by default. It’s what separates us from animals. These guys operated on that primal instinct and a man lost his life as a result. We have to entrain people to not seek confrontation. Once brain is entrained, confrontation is avoided by default when conscious decision making is shut down. This happens through neural circuits wiring and firing together. Neural plasticity allows these circuits to change which is why I think rehabilitation is possible. They had been entraining their minds for months to catch their. Our current prison system does not allow this rehabilitation to occur. It’s all about survival and prisons use natural survival instincts. The repeated exposure to this entrails the brain the opposite of what’s needed. That’s why recidivism is through the roof.

@@tuck1726 Guess what! You can wear whatever the hell you want when you go jogging, or walking, or grocery shopping, or anything else.

@@elirien4264 you missed the point. That’s not what I was trying to say at all. I said it’s not INDICATIVE of a jogger. Go to any kind of fun run, marathon, 5k or park. 99% of joggers wear relatively the same attire consisting of athletic clothing usually shorts and running shoes. You will sometimes see military dressed in uniform with boots but that is for a very specific reason. Furthermore joggers rarely sprint. There was no mention of HIIT or him doing wind sprints. Jogging and sprinting are mutually exclusive. My whole point was it doesn’t matter legally if he was jogging or not. The prosecution said he was a jogger to ensure jury saw him as victim. My point was people’s perception that a person can’t be a criminal or loiter and a victim is screwed up. They wanted the jury to not see him as those so he could be seen as victim he was. The only widely acceptable/plausible reason is he was a jogger so that’s what prosecutor went with. Conversely the defense wanted jury to see him the way the McMichaels saw him. His toe nails were indicative of someone who doesn’t run. I don’t think he was a thief, criminal or jogger. I think he liked to walk around and explore. I did that myself at start of pandemic. Usually not dressed in running attire. I would occasionally jog and go into other neighborhoods. I wouldn’t consider myself a jogger. It doesn’t matter if he was a thief, jogger, trespassing or career criminal. They had no evidence he committed a crime nor authority to detain him. I don’t understand how saying his attire is not indicative of a jogger can be disputed.

@@tuck1726 what was wrong with minding their business. If Ahmaud Arbery had been running doing the street Naked they had NO RIGHTS TO MAKE HIM TO EXPLAIN WHY HE WAS NAKED. He was not bothering any of them. They assumed he did something . Now I can assume they meant to kill him . When they chose to get their Guns from inside their home. Then get in their Truck because they assumed he had stole something. They never even used that in their defense. Now they can sit in a new neighborhood with those Assumptions for the rest of their lives. Lesson learned just because you assume someone did something you don't have the right to make them stop to talk to you about what they are doing or not doing? Another Lesson Travis should have have stayed in the house with his son and not take his gun out. Lesson they should have learned is if you kill somebody who was not bother you or your family or your property. You are going to Prison for life. Now they know.

@@geraldineallen8060 exactly! I just don’t understand why most Arbery supporters don’t stick to the undisputed facts. 1. He committed no crime 2. He was no threat 3. He was exploring construction sight 4. He was unjustly profiled and killed The jogging narrative hasn’t been proven and it just gives morons reason to justify his death. They wrongly assume if jogging narrative is false then McMichaels are justified. We have exact same viewpoint on that. Nothing Arbrery did permits someone to detain or kill him. It only matters now after his death. Each side was arguing to convince jury of their mindset. One side says they profiled him as criminal and they had to defend themselves. The other side said he was murdered due to hate. The jogging narrative was created after his death. He isn’t here to tell us what he was doing and he may have told his parents he was going for a jog. There’s more evidence he wasn’t than he was. (I suspect he liked to walk and explore. I certainly do it eases anxiety and allows me to think.)The jogging narrative was the story prosecutor and his family told. If he was known to the neighborhood as a jogger, than the McMichaels should have no reason to suspect him of criminality. That’s why jogging was continually brought up. The wanted the jury to believe there’s no reasonable person would suspect a jogger like him of stealing and he was murdered due to their hate for blacks. So the defense refuted that with evidence he was not jogging. The defense was trying to show the neighborhoods perspective of Arbrery. Many people in the neighborhood other than these guys were suspicious. If he was frequently seen just jogging, that wouldn’t be the case. He wasn’t known by neighborhood as a jogger, he was known as guy suspiciously loitering. None of this matters at all but prosecution/media bring it up. It was even brought up at sentencing. The defense has to refute the narrative. It totally skews the real picture. There were neighbors pointing at Ahmad, people calling each other, people calling cops, woman who testified her initial reaction was suspicion upon seeing him, 3 dudes chasing him and group messages all regarding about Arbrery. NOONE said anything about him being a jogger and it was all driven by suspicion. Given all these circumstances the narrative he was a jogger and no one could reasonably suspect otherwise, is a flat out lie. Clearly many reasonable people did and 3 unreasonable people did as well. Ultimately people need to mind their own business. Until he presents a danger to you, he’s none of your business. What he was doing, what they thought he was doing, what other people said, crimes in the neighborhood, what he’s was wearing, where he lived, or how many times he was seen at that house should not have been brought up at trial. It’s all irrelevant. Arbrery is innocent anyways until a jury of his peers says he committed a crime. The neighborhood gossip group chat isn’t a jury. The only exception that would constitute bringing that up in trial is if they could somehow argue those factors posed a threat to public safety. That really can’t be argued in this case.

Well, this is a very hard case too defent i think? im no lawyer... but they could never have won this case anno 2022

@@shop-a-holic3194 I that case, a more competent lawyer would have tried to seek a plea deal.

@fernando Marshall You did not just say "the verbal bitch slap," did you? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Luvin' it!

Travis's lawyer claimed she said that line about long dirty toenails because it was in the autopsy report, when they asked why he apparently said it can be a sign of mental issues. As the judge would not allow them to talk about Ahmaud Arberys history, that was the only way to tell the jury he had mental issues! I call bs on that as no one got that from her statement at all; everyone was shocked, angry and no one said oh he had mental problems then??

I think that hurt her client more than it helped. The lawyers are just as blind as their clients when it came to them understanding what remorse was shown and displayed. The judge was referring to their behavior seconds, minutes and hours after the shooting. That was what got them life without parole and the judge explained it but the lawyers was saying he was referring to remorse shown at trial. Their actions right after the shooting shows 100 percent what was in their hearts. They had no hearts !

I wonder honestly. Prosecutor said defense lawyers have a job to do, and that’s to find every possible blind spot in a trial. It’s hard to imagine defense lawyers actually buying this stuff themselves. I think defense lawyers can get in trouble for not trying to throw everything they can at the wall to see what sticks. But. Hey. It’s just as probable that they are souless.

@@Coffeebeamz one of Travis's lawyer, Sheffield, was an arrogant jerk during the trial. But he said an autograohed picture of Jesse Jackson hung in his mother's law office for over 30 years. Dibt forget that many of the people these lawyers defend are black people

That is what happens in a case like this. All of the Defense Lawyers kept talking about how these 3 murderers did hundreds and thousands of good deeds and they make up for 1 cold blooded act. Well what about Ahmaud Arbery? He also did good deeds and charitable acts. What about the future he had planned and talked about? He will never get to live that life and carry out those plans. He will never be allowed to do as many good deeds and charitable acts as he was capable of, and all because of 3 VIGILANTE MURDERERS.

Lol she's arguing for parole, dude is 66 yrs old. 🤣

@From the Futon Are you referring to Ahmaud? I am confused by your comment in relation to this post SPEAK UP🦻🏾‼️💯

@@harrellwilliams5010 He can get parole for his funeral and that should be all.

@From the Futon Answer the question as asked

Right

I have a hunch he was never a good man except to people who look like him

Good men dnt hunt humans dwn ..shoot first then ask questions later. . Neighborhood watch my ass.. Get real facts! First. Yet they chose to prosecute assassinate AA. Judging his character.

Welcome to the wacky world of White privilege 🤣

HE REMAINS A GOOD MAN, BUT HE WAS IN ON A MURDER. AHMAUDS CRIMES WERE MINIMAL, BUT TO HER HE WAS JUST A CRIMINAL

And her oodles of noodles hairdo.

@@marlenebulger6822 that’s a wig

The Mcmichaels performed a legal citizen's arrest. Arberry tried to wrestle Travis's gun away. its pretty clear self defense , and thats what it would have been if Ahmaud were a white guy.

@@MyJootube please, if Ahmaud had been a white guy the McMichaels would already been on there second year of prison, they would've gone to jail that day and never let out

@@bigman7570 I disagree, because it was self defense. Only because the color of the people involved it was highlighted by the media and BLM. It's a hot issue with these divisive entities, because they both have a problem with Whites.

@@MyJootube if Ahmaud had been white, the first thing the cops would have asked the McMichaels is why did he have a shotgun and then he said he took it out his house to chase white Ahmaud they would have handcuffed him on the spot. At the trial once the jury heard he took his shotgun out his house to chase white Ahmaud they would have found him guilty in 30 minutes

@@bigman7570 These Muppets still grasping at straws that this was self defence hopefully these weeds will be bred out !

Prosecutor is probably a terrifying debate opponent. I've tried debate once, and decided I was probably better suited to be a diplomat.

Yes she did

Great comment!!

Yeah she did. But that video speaks for itself

He absolutely would

No, he wouldn’t do it exactly the same; he’d tell Roddy to stop recording, he would wait until after the shorts to call 911 and then he’d have put a throwaway gun under or near Ahmaud’s body. Viola! Oh and shut up when the body cams were on.

Me Too , she is dumbest 👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽

This lady was beyond repulsive.....but we can't expect any less because she is on the side of a cold-blooded, racist murderer....so of course she is going to blame the victim because she has the same mindset as the murderer she defends.

JUDGE WE LOVE YOU THANK YOU.

See when you have no argument you make noise which is exactly what the defense attorney was doing. The same one who was talking abut the mans long dirty toe nails. Had he been given the chance to live he could have washed his feet and cut his nails.

The Judge AND prosecution team were no doubt incredible, fair, and REASONABLE!!! Thank you, Judge!!! If I ever see ever see you out I'm buying you a drink!!! 👍👍

Great comment!!

Absolutely no one!!!

I was wondering had those ties been cut between farther and son.

I don't think they will even see one other again. The elder is a former leo so, he'll probably be housed in an isolate part of whatever prison he'll be assigned to as former cop.

Travis will be saying "Dad why did you turn over the video that got us convicted. I thought you said it would clear our names" Greg will be saying "yeah well if you hadn't freaked out and killed the guy for no good reason, there would have been no video"

We hope....

Me too.

Definitely

😆 lol

Most of the time, it's all the defense has.

This is a great step for America! Not only Arbery familie won, awhole group of people won.

DID YOU SEE GREG STUMBLE LIKE AHMAD DID AFTER HE GIT THST SENTENCE..

@@veronicamorton9096 yes I seen that... I thought he was about to fall out. I hope they never see the day of light and get the run for their money in jail. May they never have a good night's sleep or peace again

I bet he cares now lolol

They will care and cry for their lives at gladiator school. That’s whats coming. They will be fighting with the people they hate morning noon and night until they commit suicide or killed in one of those brawls.

@@guntrader5652 They’ll try to join one of “those” brotherhoods in order to get protection.

​@@guntrader5652 5 minutes is all it took to set in motion so much distruction of lives, people's jobs, wives left alone, a mother without a son, a child who will grow up without a father. They surely will have all their remaing days to think about it. I don't think the two older men will live long; and they better hope that when they die their record from earth isn't awaiting there when they arrive and they still have to be jailed for the 20 years that they didn't serve on earth.

Well, if they do not care, they shouldn't attempt to appeal the verdict. 😑

Yes she did.

She should be bared from practicing law

You are right it cost her her career

This is at sentencing. She can no longer deny, without going against the court, that a crime happened. They had already been found guilty. So there's no danger here.

@@brittanymiller3157 Thank you

She would get you life without parole plus 250 years for a traffic ticket.

Lol she’s a complete Idiot. He was better off getting a public defender. She definitely not in the top tier of her class.

@@mrlove5161 Only these three clowns were the only ones who would touch this case.

Her toenail comment alone sealed the deal of her clients guilt. She’s a Karen defending a grand wizard with confederate flags on his truck.

She's a prosecutor, not a defense lawyer. She did an incredible job on this trial.

When Satan saw these 3 and heard what they did, he even said it and they were unholy.

@@helenprince1420 Yeah, even Satan said, "damn that was cold".

@@elirien4264 Yes he did. I wonder how Cooter and Enos and Bubba are going to act in prison? I really hope they are put in General Pop. so they know what it is like to be targeted and hunted down.

@Tim Annear maybe but even some racists know deep down inside the hypocrisy they breed. I've known plenty. Even some Arian brotherhood have admitted to me they know they're hypocrites. To them it's just a matter of belonging to enhance their pride. Which I believe why God hates pride first and foremost.

Can't imagine who that would appeal to.

She helped them GET LIFE 😂

It depends on how one look at it. It was good, should he plead insanity......there ya go!!!

Right, because his body language and facial expression speaks volumes!!!!

You are right, look at the way he was just gazing at her and finally had the opportunity to tear into their defence argument one after the other.

She is determined and relentless. Those qualities aren't teachable...

I like that, he need to use that time wisely.

Box blonde noodle head😜🙏

Exactly just so happens they got caught this time

He was running around the community harrassing people. He confronted a homeless man living under a bridge. A homeless man. Greg need to be remove from society

It’s hard to defend your clients when it’s clear from the evidence that a toddler would convict.

They tried

GOOD 😊

@@dpoly101 Good thing they were dumb enough to release their video so they get what they deserve. I just feel they actually made it worse not better for the three stooges. The prosecutor was so concise and then broke it down, she was so prepared. Then the defense would get up and it was like they were winging it out of thin air.

To be fair though, they had nothing to work with. Two vile men (dad and son), one dumb man (“Roddie” the videographer), and an extremely sympathetic victim. (R.I.P. Ahmaud Arbery). They were sunk from the start.🤷🏽‍♀️🤷🏽‍♀️🤷🏽‍♀️