Alito Invokes Pro-Palestinian Golden Gate Bridge Protest During Case About January 6 Charges
Рет қаралды 337,950
Ай бұрынAt Tuesday’s Supreme Court hearing for oral arguments for Fischer v. United States, a case that could impact Jan. 6-related cases, Justice Samuel Alito questioned attorneys about an obstruction statute used by the government.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
@WarBovine Ай бұрын
Is a congressman pulling a fire alarm during a vote considered obstruction?
@grey5751 Ай бұрын
If you're referring to the code referenced in this video, the difference is intent.
@libertyresearch-iu4fy Ай бұрын
@@grey5751 So, if you break the law, but your intent was pure then its ok? lol
@captglenn100 Ай бұрын
@@grey5751 Bowman was caught on tape pulling the fire alarm in the Cannon House Office Building in late September, shortly before the House was scheduled to vote on a government funding bill. His "intent" was to delay the vote.
@vicwei4302 Ай бұрын
not if the congressman is a democrat
@dillonblair6491 Ай бұрын
He didn't obstruct the law
@JulieMcCoy-dm3wu Ай бұрын
The Government wants to push a double standard depending on who it is. This attorney is trying to distort the interpretation.
@bob-dm1mo Ай бұрын
And the court has allowed the constitution to be trampled again and again. They have gave the government what it wants always but says ok this is the government's interests but we rule that you can't do it no more and you wasn't wrong. Imagine if you did this to a child what they would turn into.
@cheesesniper473 Ай бұрын
Thats what liberal lawyers are best at: "that doesn't mean THAT, it obviously means THIS. I interpret it as this, so therefore my stance is the only correct one." They do this for 2A claims as well, if they can open it up for interpretation, they are subsequently able to interpret whatever they want. IE it doesnt really apply to anyone in the military, so the whole thing is bunk. Then they go after all of the rest of the rights, which will be "interpreted" that you don't have any of those rights either.
@loribabich4839 Ай бұрын
When the government is done with one color what group is next .. they never stop with just one group....it's citizens against illegals at this point.
@scott8xxx532 Ай бұрын
Ridiculous unsubstantiated accusation. That's how MAGA happens!!!!!
@rationallyjustified Ай бұрын
double standard? one was a protest... the other a planned coup by white nationalist nazi groups and the ex president trying to stay in power. traitor
@andrewmo49 Ай бұрын
When you have someone in jail for years without a conviction, that is just WRONG.
@danporath536 Ай бұрын
Any defendant can ask for a speedy trial under the law, they decide not to.
@theov5590 Ай бұрын
Fascism and communism!
@KevinSmithdc Ай бұрын
@@danporath536 Where did you get that?
@StrawberrySoul77 Ай бұрын
@@danporath536where can this be confirmed?
@glennmandigo6069 Ай бұрын
@@danporath536 A point Jack Smith doesn't get
@Jenna-zv6ve2sx4u Ай бұрын
would an open border be an insurrection?
@stephenmorton8017 Ай бұрын
lol, no. better check the dictionary.
@PeterDias-mn8ty Ай бұрын
awww no karen
@ritaowen3499 Ай бұрын
Yes. The gov is literally breaking its own laws
@nathanjohnson6543 Ай бұрын
No. That's an invasion.
@brianlara8651 Ай бұрын
Is intentional ignoring the law as created by the legal representatives of the legal voting citizens, such as providing "sanctuary" to law breakers ( illegal aliens ), not a crime against democracy and the rule of law
@BibleLifeMaui Ай бұрын
The lawyer sounds so arrogant. Talking over Justice Alito and condescending to boot.
@H4ckRn00B Ай бұрын
Because Alito was lying through his teeth and interrupting HER? Yup. Yup.
@danporath536 Ай бұрын
You have never listened to voir dire before, have you?
@michaeljorfi2394 Ай бұрын
@@H4ckRn00Bwhere did he lie?
@deadgolfer6345 Ай бұрын
@@H4ckRn00B How did he lie? Wasn't he just asking questions?
@Michael-wz8lr Ай бұрын
The lawyer sounds like nothing but pure intelligence to me, take away your blinders and just listen to her, zero hesitation
@curtisbrown5939 Ай бұрын
Would pulling a fire alarm to disrupt an official House proceeding be an insurrection?
@grey5751 Ай бұрын
Does it fit the definition? why even ask this question if you know it doesn't
@stancatalin4272 Ай бұрын
Oh yeah, that is undisputed as the Congress was in session.
@shannonfisk506 Ай бұрын
Influenced enough to be censured.
@carlsanders7824 Ай бұрын
@@grey5751 How do you know what he feels? The question seems legitimate.
@tvbtvb5124 Ай бұрын
No.
@FLYBOY-eh5th Ай бұрын
Hearing that woman YAP, is extremely annoying.
@H4ckRn00B Ай бұрын
And your WHINING about her, is music to the ears of regular folks like us.
@archonicon Ай бұрын
@@H4ckRn00B Most people find her vocal fry annoying. You're definitely not regular folk. You might think you are. But youre not.
@greenmountainbrownie6473 Ай бұрын
@@H4ckRn00B I would consider myself "regular" and I find her yapping annoying too
@H4ckRn00B 29 күн бұрын
@@archonicon "Most"? So in your neonazi math 75 million is MORE than 82 million?
@joannlarson6386 29 күн бұрын
Guess you like high pitched women.
@lukestuningshop8467 Ай бұрын
Maxine Waters going to jail?
@Orson2u Ай бұрын
!!!!!!!
@LuciferTheSaint Ай бұрын
ofcourse not....they would just use the same excuse they used for Biden to save him from going to prison....."She too old and people will feel bad for her"
@stancatalin4272 Ай бұрын
She is not, though she should as she tried to cause an insurrection.
@michaeltillotson3711 Ай бұрын
For what?
@VOTP Ай бұрын
@@michaeltillotson3711"if you see anyone from this administration you get in there faces and you draw a crowd and you tell them they aren't welcome here" yeah learn the argument first.
@JulieMcCoy-dm3wu Ай бұрын
Trump asked for National Guard help so why was it refused. Something does not sound right.
@rickgora2952 Ай бұрын
Exactly and much much more including undercover agents stirring the crowd up before and on Jan 6th etc
@ProudCanadian-vv6bk Ай бұрын
Pelosi refused it. Brings up several questions.
@miltonturner2977 Ай бұрын
J6 was a SETUP by PeLousy and her Thugs, to persecute Trump Supporters...then Cheney and Kizzazzinger joined the Setup and they all then claimed Legitimacy and a supposed "Bi-Partisan" tribunal...er, Committee. All of those that set this SHAM up should be the ones in PRISON!
@fastfreddie54 Ай бұрын
Oh Bullshit, Julie. At least try to get some facts! People were begging Trump to send the National Guard, and he wouldn't do it There are mounds of evidence to that FACT!
@curtisbrown5939 Ай бұрын
It's definitely something, we've all seen the videos from the guided tour,the SCOTUS has seen the videos, and it is common knowledge that certain videos were either destroyed or withheld from the public because they showed that the vast majority of the Capitol tourists were peaceful and was ushered in by the Capital police. Nancy Palosi was responsible for the security of the Capitol and her refusal of the National guard is very suspicious to say the least.
@2JZ-4runner Ай бұрын
Shut this entire Government Down! The double standards have gone way way way too Far.
@kevinedwards6093 Ай бұрын
Only when the talking stops….😬🤔🤫
@H4ckRn00B Ай бұрын
True. Dozo the Clown should be in jail for extremely violating his gag order and witness tampering and intimidation. ANY OTHER person would've been in jail for that a loooooooooong time ago.
@doug753 Ай бұрын
It's not our real Republic government, the vacated the seats back in 1874, and started this Corporation. People have no clue how badly they have been bamboozled. Peoples lack of knowledge and basic understanding of law has made these actors in this defacto government have an easy job of creating a fake government of such incredible size that "it" has taken over and is at war with our Constitution and it's rightful owners of this nation, "We the People"
@HaimTabibi Ай бұрын
@@H4ckRn00Bactually, no. The political prosecutors make statements and the first amendment allows one to speak on political prosecutions. Suppressing the speech is a pickle for the judge and yet another error in the matter.
@joannlarson6386 29 күн бұрын
It is illegal by N.Y. law to benefit off of a trial, up to 6 removed from judges family.Thee judges daughter gets paid by the Democrat party so this trial is a pony show to keep the dumb looking one way while they are doing everything else to allow the country to be taken .
@MrBeetsGaming Ай бұрын
The Jan 6 PROTESTERS are political prisoners period, nobody should be spending YEARS in prison over it. There was a retired police chief who also served in the military who got 11 YEARS and he never entered the building, it's disgusting.
@Jenna-zv6ve2sx4u Ай бұрын
alot of lawsuits if they ever get freed
@BB_The_Impaler Ай бұрын
Dude, I wasn't even there and they charged me with 1512 because I did not condem what was going on in a chat room I was in. There is no justice and just wait, the supreme court is going to sell us out, guarantee is because I can tell you that personally I will sue the living shit out of the DOJ for the hell I have been and am still going through over this.
@MrBeetsGaming Ай бұрын
@@Jenna-zv6ve2sx4u I sure hope so... I'm not saying they're all squeaky clean but nobody deserved to go to prison over it, especially not for the crazy amounts of time some are getting. 22 years for the proud boys guy that wasn't even in the city is sickening..... Probation would have been sufficient for 99.9% of them, if even that.
@kimberlybanks9969 Ай бұрын
What gets me is Bill Clinton pardoned a woman who BOMBED the US Capitol in a politic protest & she’s free now making a lot of money on a company board.
@theov5590 Ай бұрын
Fascism, communism, totalitarianism and 3rd world country.
@geraldvandewal5788 Ай бұрын
She is a biased activist.
@ritaowen3499 Ай бұрын
DC Dept of Justice.
@YayaValder Ай бұрын
@@ritaowen3499I see no difference.
@DorothySpang 29 күн бұрын
IMO every Democrat today is a Globalist Climate-Covid Mafia AMERICA LAST
@HollyMoore-wo2mh 29 күн бұрын
🎯🎯
@kittymeekins1682 Ай бұрын
What if an ambulance was stopped on the bridge and a patient died because of the protesters? They are not following order in society. I do not think protests should be allowed to block traffick or business at all. We are to take our grievances to our representatives, not create mob unrest.
@tsunamiiwinterz-px7oz Ай бұрын
what if space aliens landed? sheesh, get serious
@loribabich4839 Ай бұрын
It's not a protest at that point...
@libertyresearch-iu4fy Ай бұрын
@@tsunamiiwinterz-px7oz Are space aliens US citizens?
@cool_rick618 Ай бұрын
@@tsunamiiwinterz-px7oz They will be invited to take place in federal elections without photo ID, apparently.
@user-zu5do6ri6r Ай бұрын
We don't have representatives. Corporations do. We lost the privilege of having peaceful protests.
@Autofill1967 Ай бұрын
What Alito proved is what we all know. A TWO TIER justice system. It all depends on the interpretation of the prosecutor. If a prosecutor WANTS to charge someone, then they can INTERPRET a statue anyway they choose. In almost all cases, the defendant wont have the resources to properly defend themselves so they will be found GUILTY. Yet another prosecutor can show preferential treatment depending upon various reasons such as venue, etc. This is why uniformity is essential to the rule of law. If the rule of law is subjective, then the execution of justice is contingent upon other factors other than the law.
@WilbertJohnson-nq5zd Ай бұрын
Very good comment
@TryssemTavern Ай бұрын
The problem is it is impossible to create laws before crimes are committed. When they find a way to 'game' the system (Thanks to folks like Alito), we have to try and patch the hole. Assuming the powers that be, allow those holes to be patched. Al Capone, for example, had to be busted on tax violations because despite knowing full stop that he was the one ordering people to be killed, there was no law that could be used to put him behind bars.
@chastonburke6558 Ай бұрын
Well said!
@WilbertJohnson-nq5zd Ай бұрын
@@TryssemTavern very good comment
@jennifermarkens1882 Ай бұрын
Alito takes benefits from wealthy persons and doesn't give a rat's behind about inequality: voting against voting enfranchisement and women.
@0giwan Ай бұрын
Who else hears her arguing "rules for me but not for thee"?
@user-fb7jt9qq6d Ай бұрын
Holding Those Bridges Hostage is A Terriost Attack!!!
@michaeltillotson3711 Ай бұрын
Yeah, that's why we called the trucker protests terrorist actions
@aceoffox3028 Ай бұрын
@@michaeltillotson3711 Good that we can agree that the years of black lives matter road protests were also terroristic. Yall set the precedent and yall pick and choose who you charge and who you don't. It's two tiered, only Truckers were ever actually punished...
@huwhitecavebeast1972 27 күн бұрын
Nonsense.
@GKLCTZ Ай бұрын
Keep fighting for truth and justice Honorable Alito!
@j.r.warren5794 Ай бұрын
If no elites were harmed or threatened it's not important to them.
@neilreynolds3858 Ай бұрын
That's the purpose of government.
@patrickadams5487 Ай бұрын
She lives on another planet
@darrendavis4731 Ай бұрын
She should be home making matsa soup for her husband.
@hawaiiangunner Ай бұрын
Yeah it's called liberal Washington DC
@patrickadams5487 Ай бұрын
@@darrendavis4731 yep
@patrickadams5487 Ай бұрын
@@hawaiiangunner for real, 😂
@bidenwearsdiapers4026 Ай бұрын
@@toinfinityandbeyondmann8398 👈🏼🤣 he’s not equating, he’s testing the government attorney’s interpretation of the statute in question, derp. It’s what SCOTUS justices do. What’s sad is that I have to explain this to you.
@OregonMike Ай бұрын
Rules for thee but not for we
@douglemay7989 Ай бұрын
Yet, Stinky walks free.
@markk7509 Ай бұрын
It’s funny her telling a justice he’s wrong and doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
@inlandindieP35 28 күн бұрын
Not funny HA HA…
@mikeham5465 28 күн бұрын
But she’s wrong.. she’s not telling him he’s wrong she is the one incorrect.. the government is taking a very narrow section of the law and are expanding that to a group of people.. When they never have before
@zackthebongripper7274 Ай бұрын
SCOTUS has been on fire lately. Kicking some legal ASS.
@robertthomas5906 29 күн бұрын
It's way overdue. Stuff has been piling up for decades.
@gilbeggergilbegger5819 Ай бұрын
she was saying..."'its wrong when we says its wrong"
@edfloate3283 Ай бұрын
I would say Justice Alito is brilliant, except what he says is common sense.
@wowbagger3505 Ай бұрын
Common sense is sometimes brilliance!
@Ramdelfalcao2024 Ай бұрын
Alito he pro Israel help him to come out with a word good
@wathaet1386 Ай бұрын
These days, using what we used to call common sense is uncommon and seems to require brilliance. It is now uncommon sense formerly known as common sense.
@septembersurprise5178 Ай бұрын
Common sense has become, almost, a Super Power.
@natyong Ай бұрын
Justice Alito IS brilliant! What is exceptional to me is that these brilliant Harvard educated minds rarely argue with common sense.
@mandybradley3079 Ай бұрын
Release them all. Double standards. Democrats go free. Republicans go to jail.
@inlandindieP35 28 күн бұрын
Popular culture, government, media and academia all seem to approve of that general outcome.
@beautifully_scarred_lea Ай бұрын
Wow. She proves that there is a two-tier system
@user-pg7iq8zd5u Ай бұрын
Justice Alito is a GENIUS...I have listened to him on many occasions and he is TOO smart for these lawyers...this woman is REACHING....I feel sorry for her!
@sofly7634 Ай бұрын
Feel sorry? People are rotting in jail for nothing.smh
@michaeltillotson3711 Ай бұрын
@@sofly7634 for committing insurrection because an orange baby cried about losing an election
@robertthomas5906 29 күн бұрын
@@michaeltillotson3711 There was no insurrection. Nobody has been charged with that. The FBI has said it never happened. You have no basis to say there was an insurrection. Other than MSM telling you to think that. Think I"m wrong? Ok, show me one person that was charged with an insurrection on 1/6. If you can't, you're being told what to think and that should bother you. Were there a real insurrection congress would have been taken over. It would have been a much different affair. More like the cities burning for the 6 months previous to 1/6. People were burning, looting, murdering. Yet strangely a lack of people prosecuted over it.
@johnmontoya8160 28 күн бұрын
@michaeltillotson3711 not one of the Jan 6 defendants was charged with insurrection. Ooooooff.
@michaeltillotson3711 28 күн бұрын
@johnmontoya8160 so your argument is that we should ignore pretextual prosecution and if someone isn't formally charged them then we can't say they did it? Let's apply that logic and see how it goes. Was Al Capone a mob boss or bootlegger? Simple yes or no question
@user-tr8fs7lm8r Ай бұрын
Basically she's arguing that if Insurrectionists want to block access to the city or to Congress to keep them from voting, that's perfectly legal? Great. Thanks for letting them know.
@michaelmurphy2112 Ай бұрын
So is pulling the fire alarm to cause an evacuation. Completely ok.
@calvinhobbes6118 Ай бұрын
Yup. These are those SPECIAL LAWS which DC politicians and bureaucrats have specifically written to protect their power and their grift and to stop us from exposing their criminality and corruption.
@scytaleghola5969 Ай бұрын
Actually, she was arguing the opposite.
@scytaleghola5969 Ай бұрын
@@michaelmurphy2112 Different building, but nice try.
@scott8xxx532 Ай бұрын
Basically she's arguing the exact opposite of what you wrote.
@ronaldmorgan7632 Ай бұрын
That was not their intent, so no matter what happened its cool. I wish that Alito would have brought up the BLM protesters. I wonder if her rebuttal would have been, "Well, that was just free speech."
@arthurmcdermott3312 Ай бұрын
I'm surprised that he didn't make the comparison to the protesters that threated his life outside of his house during the roe v wade opinion leak. Still wondering how no one was held accountable for that leak
@douglemay7989 Ай бұрын
It was actually public outcry over a tone deaf response to racial incidents by Donald Trump.
@loris3595 Ай бұрын
There were Pro Hamas supporters IN THE CAPITOL recently. It barely got reported. Most obviously do not even know about it. Congress WAS in session and they WERE disruptive.
@jerryhatley5004 Ай бұрын
Oh my god….OH MY god…she’s got that mouth going all the time but is saying NOTHING!!!
@anonygent Ай бұрын
Not true, listen again. She's straight up saying that if the Justice Department agrees with the protesters' politics, they won't prosecute.
@cirocko1 Ай бұрын
that woman lawyer needs a voice coach, that voice is horrible ,
@msrjorge1805 Ай бұрын
She sounds like AOC! Absolutely awful
@ayojoy1443 29 күн бұрын
@@msrjorge1805 the lawyer's voice is so annoying. I don't think she is aware of how her voice sounds. It is so repelling.
@wilburhornshnoggle2619 28 күн бұрын
Imagine working hard all day and coming home to that..
@peralta2912 Ай бұрын
this is why I dislike lawyers they talk in circles making very little sense, how do you justify blocking a bridge access as not intent to obstruct.
@DoggosAndJiuJitsu Ай бұрын
Finally the SCOTUS says what we’re all thinking. Great job, Alito.
@MsSimone1001 Ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@brigitte9999 Ай бұрын
They are happening every day so they aren’t hypotheticals.
@herbertfawcett7213 Ай бұрын
Would pulling a fire alarm in the Congress Building during a vote count under the law?
@seanrhone5306 Ай бұрын
Wouldn't this also apply to the Congress men that pulled the fire alarm stopping a vote?
@alicestanley177 Ай бұрын
His example is very good. Many protests have delayed some proceedings but never were charged for serious crimes.
@marlonboothe9257 Ай бұрын
The Administrative state has gone nuts ! OMG
@nickgeorgiou7770 Ай бұрын
Doesn’t she understand you can’t split the baby. What’s good for you should be good for me. The ignorance of the Solicitors General is astounding
@robertthomas5906 29 күн бұрын
That's how they like them. Listen to Senator Kennedy questioning judges and other officials. Judges that are not even familiar with terms that they should know from every day use as a judge. Yet they're clueless as the janitor.
@xray606 Ай бұрын
That was the most elaborate version of... "But, this is different!"... I think I've ever heard. She's a real try hard, I'll give her that.
@Pledgeman Ай бұрын
So it’s up to interpretation of those in power to say whether or not a rule is being broken? Vote them out!
@neilreynolds3858 Ай бұрын
That's the way the law has always worked, yes.
@jasonmartin7711 Ай бұрын
This shows you how WOKE these people who call themselves attorneys really have become who do not understand the law.
@jennifermarkens1882 Ай бұрын
Woke? you mean like those who actually follow Christ's teachings?
@scott8xxx532 Ай бұрын
who didn't understand the law? it is common for judges and attorneys to review and discuss statutes like this, e..g. Trump's lawyers have been questioned and challenged by the justices on several of the arguments they have brought to the Supreme Court. The mere questioning and challenging does not prove that the attorney doesn't know the law, it is a normal part of the process.
@jasonmartin7711 Ай бұрын
@@jennifermarkens1882 The U.S. law is not about following Christ teachings... Go live in Iran and see how well that works out for the Iranian people. We are not a theocracy government.
@jasonmartin7711 Ай бұрын
@@jennifermarkens1882 When the Supreme Court is reversed with ruling in favor of liberals you do not hear conservatives whine like a bunch of crybabies privileged brats. We obey the LAW..
@treginatodd2149 Ай бұрын
Talk all she wants he’s not buying it .
@hawaiiangunner Ай бұрын
I'm literally watching the justice department attack Justice and the constitution. I am utterly befuddled
@annsheridan12 Ай бұрын
Simply because inside every Democrat, leftists, resides a dictator.
@Vaticider69 Ай бұрын
She destroys her own argument...
@audijo6562 Ай бұрын
Oh, that voice! Nails on a chalkboard!
@flyingled3176 Ай бұрын
As bad as hildabeast
@SingleSuccessfulMomMBA1422 Ай бұрын
This has to stop
@alankooiker4653 Ай бұрын
That broad has a voice which requires oldyeller mercy😂😂😂
@tokesalotta1521 Ай бұрын
She couldn't answer the first set of questions. She could only say it was different than jan 6.
@tvbtvb5124 Ай бұрын
Because it was.
@Jenna-zv6ve2sx4u Ай бұрын
@@tvbtvb5124 explain?
@johnnycole7990 Ай бұрын
One allowed because it's the progressive left other is not allowed because it's the conservative right.... Just be honest cause we can see it with our own eyes
@cyberedge881 27 күн бұрын
It's blatantly obvious, no matter how she dresses it up.
@BrandyJ9999 Ай бұрын
What if you’re in labor trying to get to the hospital and you need a csection and this kills you and your baby?
@karenclark266 Ай бұрын
Or you are on your way to work, fail to get there and get fired? Or you're experiencing cardiac distress and die because you couldn't get to a clinic?
@BrandyJ9999 Ай бұрын
@@karenclark266 exactly I’m pregnant so that’s where my mind goes tbh scary
@beecee9681 Ай бұрын
First thing, we would need to know your politics or who you voted for before we know it wasn't your fault.
@glennmandigo6069 Ай бұрын
I think the Dems view on abortion answers that question
@neilreynolds3858 Ай бұрын
Are you one of the elite? If not, too bad.
@garrydye2394 Ай бұрын
That voice....
@galatianman4293 Ай бұрын
It's the voice . . . Of a Karen.
@wandamcgiboney5141 Ай бұрын
Are the FBI going to be held accountable.
@garyw9164 29 күн бұрын
How about the ATF, CDC, NIH too?
@itsdiane2you11 Ай бұрын
Her voice...make it stop!!
@frederickcombs8661 Ай бұрын
She is snarking at the judge
@glenbard657 Ай бұрын
"Were it not for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all." - Chris Plante
@scytaleghola5969 Ай бұрын
There are plenty of standards to go around. In fact, most people have double.
@williambarnes5023 Ай бұрын
If leftists didn't have double standards, then how could they blame you for both of theirs being shit?
@Condor1970 Ай бұрын
I do think Alito has a very good point. Imo, anyone that protests and impedes official gov't business like that, should be charged in accordance with the written law. Whether it's blocking a bridge and impeding free travel of citizens and gov't vehicles, or protesters in the courtroom. Something needs to be done to stop these maniacs who think they can stop traffic and hold up thousands of peoples lives, just so they can yell and scream about something. You have every right to protest...you do not have a right to purposely impede everyone else's freedom. Now, should people be in jail for 4 years for trespassing? No. That's way overkill and could be considered cruel and unusual punishment for a misdemeanor.
@kitbram2033 Ай бұрын
Ugh, she loses on her voice.
@chaseparrish5963 Ай бұрын
Lol yes I cant stand listening to her
@ricksmith4736 Ай бұрын
@@chaseparrish5963 Just like the woman " field" reporters on the NFL games....
@sherialba3226 Ай бұрын
Agreed.
@TonyRedunzo Ай бұрын
the vocal fry .....................
@GeeTrieste Ай бұрын
This lady sounds like Penny from the movie Lost in Space.
@alfr1 28 күн бұрын
Give those 5 minute obstructionists 1 year in prison for Contempt of Congress. No judiciary action needed.
@vv5179 Ай бұрын
She’s on planet Zoolo with her what she feels the word “impede” means.
@voxmerus Ай бұрын
Ugh what is her voice
@jbmatheny4957 Ай бұрын
LOL, the Supreme Court expects a labral "lawyer" to use a and understand a definition from a dictionary.
@buttercup4123 Ай бұрын
Imagine a whole country filled with these kind of people. Lol
@queenbee3647 Ай бұрын
One half of our country just about is like this.
@timsharkey1993 Ай бұрын
DC is filled with this kind of people, and that’s the main problem we face today.
@gforce0311 Ай бұрын
Another perfect argument for why there are too many laws and .gov has too much power 🧐
@path852 Ай бұрын
"THEY" want two different standards of rules and laws.
@yamilhapalma8244 Ай бұрын
The Judge ... 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@Rich32262 Ай бұрын
Good grief. How about an emergency for police or fire, getting your child on time, etc, etc. This blocking the roads needs to stop. I worked for one of the biggest fire departments in the country in South Fl. and when I-95 or the FL's Turnpike got shut down for an accident, FL Highway Patrol was on us about the millions of dollars it cost to keep roads shut down, and pushed to have them open ASAP. So close them for protestors but open fast after a serious car wreck, got it.
@HamiltonSRink Ай бұрын
San Francisco Police stood by and watched as they blocked traffic on the Golden Gate. Please somebody explain why the cops were not handing out bruises and hauling them away in handcuffs?
@joeblow123 Ай бұрын
it's commiefornia
@gunner1534 Ай бұрын
Some protestors tried that sh*t in FL as well on monday, the outcome in FL was much different. The cops yanked them out of the Street and started making arrests.
@jackmaher4466 Ай бұрын
Because those in charge want confusion, discontent etc... Imagine what the response would be if a bunch of Christians blocked bridges to protest abortions. You know they would be removed immediately. Arrested and charged in every way possible. Yet these bridge protesters get no charges.
@mitzilangpitman4491 Ай бұрын
Because they are not allowed to. 🚫
@hoppingrabbit9849 Ай бұрын
Force makes genocide go away? 😂😅
@earlford5642 Ай бұрын
ignorance of the law is not an excuse
@alpaapon Ай бұрын
Avoid the conflict and ignore the law that isn't the same thing.
@loribabich4839 Ай бұрын
Neither is systemic incompetence.
@steves6407 Ай бұрын
That statement no longer rings true! When you have so many laws (10s of 1,000's ) and so many of then you need legal scholars to interpret them, they are no longer just or even legal laws because at some point in their use of complicated wording they will violate the US Constitution and therefore be Invalid!
@christophervincent8420 Ай бұрын
She apparently is ignorant of the law herself
@H4ckRn00B Ай бұрын
@@christophervincent8420 not that you can say which law, or how exactly she's ignorant of it. ....
@cesarcesar5129 Ай бұрын
Thank you KZfaq for the context banner. Without it I might fall prey to disinformation, misinformation, or the dreaded malinforimation. 💙
@suzanchizen575 Ай бұрын
Definitely double standards.
@caryccharlson Ай бұрын
I just wish they would serve Justice equally regardless of your goals or your political standing
@HikeOn5555 Ай бұрын
Why doesn't she just come out and say what she thinks.... this only applies to conservative protests!
@KGTiberius Ай бұрын
INTENT is necessary. Intent to specifically hinder or delay specific action (eg. a vote) versus specific intent for a general disruption irrespective of a target (e.g. the general public). BOTH are (imho) criminal, just that the first can come as two charges (the target as well as the general public). People have the right to peaceably assemble and protest, collect signatures, recall politicians from office and replace them. People do not have the right to steal time of others via blocking freedom of movement.
@DorothySpang 29 күн бұрын
Why can't I BLOCK Wikipedia??
@julianlayton9081 Ай бұрын
She blabbering
@lutomson3496 Ай бұрын
this women is pathetic, she cant shut up keeps yapping to tire out the court to hear only her side
@Green-cm4eb Ай бұрын
What? They would let illegals out of jail, with no bond. Sickening!
@SCCCC1 Ай бұрын
The nightmare of a society turned over to lawyers to destroy people at will.
@bobbob-vw4cc Ай бұрын
lol, Wikipedia call Jan 6 an attack and not an insurrection...what give?
@user-eh5cr4or6k Ай бұрын
If you paying attention all of the media is starting to back off of their Insurrection moniker, and starting to use Riot and other terms now.
@OregonMike Ай бұрын
Wiki lies a lot
@ricksmith4736 Ай бұрын
@@OregonMike A liberial WOKE organization.. NEVER send them money when they ask....
@calvinhobbes6118 Ай бұрын
Wikipedia is trash. Dont visit that site.
@felixthekate4800 Ай бұрын
KZfaq not Wikipedia
@Overitall805 Ай бұрын
We have a BIG problem in this country and if we don't get ahold of it , we are done for.
@johnjacobjinglehimerschmid3555 Ай бұрын
... and this is why we love lawyers. So much obfuscating, excessive definition, so much that even a smart person gets lost. SMH
@kimberlybanks9969 Ай бұрын
She even said the use of “impede” was an alliteration, basically, just a filler word that doesn’t mean anything except to rhyme or be a filler “repeat” word when he said obstruct was not the same as impede!?!?!?!
@Rr43473 Ай бұрын
They loose their minds to repeat a lie and became true for them... not for us.
@dickthedorkwing6082 Ай бұрын
This woman is arrogance personified.
@Ellenp-X Ай бұрын
Her voice brings out the worst, it’s awful, and sounds like she’s trying to promote her wokeness to the judge, like that would change their ruling. If I had to listen to her, I’d rule guilty
@vv5179 Ай бұрын
Naw, she’s just aggressive; she’s actually really good at standing her ground, even though she is evil.
@scott8xxx532 Ай бұрын
Exactly what did she say that is "arrogant"? She is answering his questions and providing her legal argument based on the law. In the end it is up to the 9 justices to decide whether or not they agree with her. But simply answering the questions asked to her is not "arrogant", unless maybe you just think women should be seen not heard....
@dickthedorkwing6082 Ай бұрын
@@scott8xxx532 how about the multiple times she talks over the Justice like she runs the show. In a lower court she might have caught a contempt charge.
@scott8xxx532 Ай бұрын
@@Ellenp-X Hopefully you will NEVER serve on a jury, basing your ruling on how a person's voice bothers you... and weirdly seeking ways to feed your confused obsession with "woke" people despite clearly having no understanding of what "woke" even means... No wonder Trump has such strong loyalty from 35% of the country......... That's MAGA!!!!!
@signsoflife8905 Ай бұрын
Some J6 folks going to be Millionaires
@loris3595 Ай бұрын
PRO HAMAS supporters WERE in the Capitol during a session of Congress recently which they thoroughly disrupted. NOTHING was done to them.
@777NCM Ай бұрын
The problem is there weren't enough police in the capitol and Trump's request to bring in the National Guard was denied.
@glennmandigo6069 Ай бұрын
Because of Pelosi
@TheLaughingMustache-oh5ff Ай бұрын
KZfaq's context warnings is a joke, might as well start naming this site NPRtube.
@kirkcrawford6976 Ай бұрын
Definitely like pulling a fire alarm..
@steviedfromtheflyovercount4739 Ай бұрын
Sounds like selective prosecution, the key element is whether you are a Leftist? Free pass.
@lukestuningshop8467 Ай бұрын
BLM? Antifa? Crazy pink hats? etc....talk about hypocritic! We all see it!
@dannyp252 Ай бұрын
Somebody better tell that judge Alito that many have been in jail for over a year he doesn't believe that any of them been in jail for over a day or two
@Kyle-sr6jm Ай бұрын
Conviction and sentencing =/= detention
@hanoverfist6176 Ай бұрын
The president can't order NG domestically.. states must request it.. also CP opened capitol doors..
@rgspeer1 Ай бұрын
Washington, DC is a federal reservation comes under the jurisdiction of the federal government, so yes, the president can call on the NG. President H. Hoover call on the military to break up the Bonus protest. Gen. Douglas MacArthur was the commanding officer for that operation. Look it up.
@tvbtvb5124 Ай бұрын
True, but he could call the Virginia governor or the military... What would he have done if the Capital had been attacked by a foreign government? He was the president.
@karenclark266 Ай бұрын
@@tvbtvb5124 Trump cannot call the DC National Guard but he requested both the DC Mayor and Nancy Pelosi as the Speaker to activate the National Guard for DC. That is the procedural law that is required for a DC response. Trump made the request to both and they both turned him down. As if they both wanted this to happen.
@tvbtvb5124 Ай бұрын
@@karenclark266 Surely your logic.
@hanoverfist6176 29 күн бұрын
@@tvbtvb5124 foreign interference would be considered insurrection..
@ginabird111865 Ай бұрын
Supreme Court should of never took up this bs
@charlesyoung2530 Ай бұрын
Why?
@Rr43473 Ай бұрын
Bs minding
@marthaball8029 Ай бұрын
Yeah what about that???? WTF!
@wings1856 Ай бұрын
REMEMBER ASHLY BABBIT!!!
Ай бұрын
The way you vote matters! People 👀watching.
@salimoneus Ай бұрын
When did AOC become an attorney?
@TheObeyMayhem Ай бұрын
She got her BAR card by serving drinks at a bar, not by studying LAW.
@marlonboothe9257 Ай бұрын
Laws must apply equally to all ! What is wrong with her ?
@queenbee3647 Ай бұрын
One of the foundations of our justice system IS equal application of the law. Its actually addressed in plain language that there will be no favorites or exceptions, that the law for murder is the same here or there and so are the guidelines for punishment. They have thrown that out the window since our country was taken over by fascism.
@stancatalin4272 Ай бұрын
Alito got some good points, he should bring up Jamal Bowman, he literally delayed procedures by the Congress.
@FreeMenDieFree Ай бұрын
Gorsuch brought up the fire alarm incident without mentioning ant specific names.
@carolinahill536 29 күн бұрын
All I hear from that arrogant woman is “blah blah blah blah … only my point of view is valid and correct, anything or anyone disagreeing is deplorable”🙄
@sladeritter6695 Ай бұрын
Weird how it always basically boils down to 'but its ok when WE do it'
Forbes Breaking News
Рет қаралды 116 М.
СВІТАН: ЩОЙНО! Сирський таємно перекинув ЗСУ. Знищили останній ракетоносій Росії. РФ тікає з Джанкої
24 Канал
Рет қаралды 384 М.
'A Screening Rather Than A Vetting': Andy Biggs Raises Alarms Over People Entering The United States
Forbes Breaking News
Рет қаралды 1,4 М.
Forbes Breaking News
Рет қаралды 15 М.
Reuters
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Радио Свобода
Рет қаралды 454 М.
CBS News
Рет қаралды 40 М.
Good Morning America
Рет қаралды 23 М.