Don't forget anti-american and tyrannical ignorance

Idiotic more like it

😂😂😂

How? He is literally another cnn trash?

Yeah

...who repeats the exact same thing every other news station does.

@@mobilusinmobili8321 except with other news stations there aren't any jokes, or breakdowns of complicated issues. The Daily Show used to be my favorite way to stay up to speed with current events but it's just not the same anymore

No he wasn’t

Especially in his echo chamber. Everyone is smart in an echo chamber

Agreed. This is where he is needed

@@stephansteohanlarsen7457 we will never forget his amazing jokes. Like that 2948266288558372 times he did trump voice. Which is so original as we all know. Or him stealing jokes from Twitter.

@@MagicBus-ct7fewhy tf are you even here? Are you missing him too?

nah i disagree. people like trevor noah are not needed. we don’t appreciate people like trevor noah in the world. we will always dismiss everything he says as if he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. happens all the time. we would rather listen to people who lie to us. but the person giving us the truth we turn him into the enemy.

Ok . I'm fine with doing what you fascists want. Let's ban guns. But government people should give them too. So for example. The white house guards and the FBI agents and CIA asshols won't have guns.

@@MagicBus-ct7fe These folks love police brutality and cops strong-arming innocent folk. They love the idea of cops killing Americans. Of course they want them armed.

We also have too many GOP, who are only interested in $bribes$ from the NRA

man you said it. it’s obvious these people don’t care.

Too bad we have to leave it to a comedian to come up with these logical points. Our politicians seem to cower when faced with the monumental decisions.

He grew up in a society where his very existence was a crime. You learn from that or you stay trapped. He's smart and wise.

Trevor is quite dim

In an echo chamber

Don’t ever compare the two! It’s disrespectful and shows your knowledge on who he was! Towards the end of his life MLK had a shift in beliefs and was ready to March on Washington with arms which is why he was killed!

MLK Jr fought for civil rights. Trevor Noah is doing the opposite. The 2nd amendment is a civil right, and he just spent 5 minutes fighting to restrict it

Whats ironic is MLK was denied a gun permit as he was trying to get one due to his increased publicity. He was denied for reasons. Because whether you agree or not, gun control is rooted in racism and is historically racist. Which is weird considering the party who loves gun control is "anti racist" and everything to them is racist.

He is also not a citizen

@@arion9696 To be president, one must be born a citizen, not just become one. But that's interesting. Thanks. 🙂

If someone has a knife or gun..... wouldn’t you want one for yourself or maybe a law abiding citizen sees someone attacking you.... and maybe idk.... shoots the attacker???

@@Megatron_James_Brady8121I understand your logic. However we have to address the elephant in the room. Many gun deaths (I don’t have a metric available) are domestic and are the result of someone living in the home discharging the household firearm into another occupant or themselves purposefully and accidentally. However I also feel that most of our gun violence is related to poor mental health services here in the states.

@heroichitsuji great, so you're up for paying for mental health in this country. How about the red flag laws that take guns away from abusers.

​@@Megatron_James_Brady8121 how about ban weapons, u'll probably get attacked with a pocket knife, just run or whip out ur own pocket knife. You don't have to worry about getting attacked with a weapon if nobody has a weapon!

​@@kreiner1 in my country we don't need firearms to be taken away from abusers because nobody has access to firearms. Yeah sure they'll just beat or stab someone but 1. Better chance of survival 2. I've never heard of a kid from my country accidentally shooting themselves or others

😂 This is one of the goofiest ideas I've seen in a while.

Lol, you really are clueless bud. I live in a gun free country so I believe in gun control, but also that is such a naive idea that just won’t work in the slightest.

Um. Aren’t guns modular in nature?

No

Yet somehow countries where people aren't armed to the teeth have less deaths per capita due to crime.

Grandpa did you take your meds yet?

He’s racist, don’t follow him

😂😂😂

sheep.

Hardly. Another blowhard celebrity clueless on any sort of logic or factual statistics.

This is nothing but corporate/ state propaganda.

I'd say it's access to illegal guns. More illegal guns require more legal guns to counteract. If you got rid of illegal guns, legal gun usage would plummet. It's a problem very similar to drug trade, and making more laws isn't gonna solve it.

@@arcturus4762 That would break a very complex situation down to one external source of trouble - what in itself is pretty unrealistic. The number of leagl guns by definition give us the setting of how easy it is that some fall through the grid and become illegal guns. When every grandfather who went to cemetry for age leaves a box with guns no one can track, than you - by definition - have alot of them. If anyone can carry a gun, no one sticks out by having an illegal one. If every shop owner has a gun under his desk, every robber need a similar or bigger gun. If you#re allowed to have a machinegun for fun shooting at the range, every bank robber is in theory also able to get ther hands on a military grade gun, and police responsind has to bring even bigger guns. Police running around like in marines Falludscha not spark much trust of citizens in ther personal safety and tend to get more guns themself. Adding that this overly militarised police then have a similar standing to citizenz than marines ahve to arabs in Falludscha ... there isen't much mystery to why so much violence hgappens so often and so extensive. Maybe where our perspective cross is that perception of safety make a lot of reason for gun ownership. And that is my point - the US doesn't have much trust. Not in the police, not the gov, not your neighbour, black vs latino, latino vs. white, white vs. all others, and vice versa. Rich against poor, poor against minority, republican vs. democrat, christian sect 1 against christian sect 2, and so on. This nation is at war. And where others are in social trouble as well, the US is unfortunatly armed to the teeth and life in a strange perception of being the best possible society humans can technically establish. That prevents (the bigger parts of) americans from realising that the're pretty down the road in culture and social cohesion. For european fascists, the US is a role model, and for everyone else its a third world nation that just have a too big army to tell them right in the face. So that might create some gaps in perception, depending on position.

MultiCULTuralism is like that.

You clearly don't understand anything

You’re right.... they want whatever the criminals have or more to defend themselves and their families

⁠@@Megatron_James_Brady8121dude thinks everyone thats a criminal has a firearm and just robs houses with you and your family in it. Anyone smart doesnt raid your house while you’re there first of all, second we need guns out of mentally ill hands, third not every crime has a gun connected but school/mass shooting do because hmm theyre SHOOTINGS. Instead of writing comments, seriously inquire forums or real life conversation to see the big picture, get out of whatever criminals will have all the guns and well have none mindset, it’s uneducated.

Which is reasonable. We should have access to the weapons the people ruling over us have

The studies they quote are done through biased sources and have less than 1,000 people out of 335,000,000 people in the US. Most gun owners do not support these. This is another fallacy.

The exact same problem happens in the US to black and brown communities. Their cities heavily restrict gun ownership despite poor neighborhoods being full of criminal with illegal guns. They purposefully do that because they can keep them poor and unprotected for free votes. Otherwise they'd solve the gang problem themselves.

Oh, how I wish that were a possibility.

We have a constitutional right to own guns. This is not the same.

it's actually a nice idea until we start talking about what is a normal person??? For example In my opinion transgenders should not have guns the same for none binary people. If you ask a fascist democrat he will tell you if you don't support BLM that's a red flag .

@@MagicBus-ct7fe Well that makes you not normal and a bigot in my case so in my opinion YOU should not be allowed gun and get some therapy instead to cure you of your bigotry. And a psych eval which is obviously also needed in your case. Hint you would probably not pass it in my country.

@@S1D3W1ND3R015 So according to you an insane person should be allowed weapons? All you need is to be a citizen, to be an adult and to be sane in my country to get a gun.

Many gun owners show responsibility here because they don't have any issues handling weapons. That is constantly demonstrated. I have been shooting since I was 6 years old. I have been well trained via family and not governmentally trained. Yet I haven't killed anyone and I haven't maimed anyone.

What books?

Facts

@@VaroVammaYes you are.

Like people who riot over dead felons like George Floyd. That is why guns arent going anywhere. Get used to it.😂

Nope. It's about banning nearly all weapons. The deadliest school shooting was done with pistols, is Mr. Noah going to ban handguns? What will Mr. Noah do when people ignore his confiscation order?

I'm from a gun-free, almost weapon-free country. Ur all so weird, being afraid isn't even a thing here. Literally if someone attacks u it's either with an illegal weapon (highly unlikely) or a pocket knife, in that case just carry a pocket knife as well. U guys keep this whole thing going, ur all posessed with fear. You don't need a firearm or massive knife to protect yourself if there's nothing to protect yourself from.. people having guns makes other people feel the need to have guns because all you guys care about is your 'property' and being agressive about protecting it and yourself. If you banned guns you wouldn't have to be so paranoid about other people shooting your with their guns

​@@JChang0114literally just reward people for handing in their guns, using the police to check if people really don't have a gun, etc etc it's not an easy process and everyone will protest but it will make your country so much safer and respectable cause honestly to the majority of most countries america is those insane ppl who'd rather have their kids slaughtered at school than give up their guns

@@gss4470 How will you reward me for turning in my gun? Are we going to seize the property and money of only people that don't have guns? If not, the only thing you are doing is taking people's property and paying them back with their own tax dollars. As for using the police, how will you accomplish that with them needing a warrant to search a person's house? Finally, what if people resist? Are we really going to have an armed confrontation over a pistol?

@@JChang0114 -"How will you reward me for turning in my gun?" It's called a gun buyback program. -"Are we going to seize the property and money of only people that don't have guns?" Where the heck did that come from? Nobody is talking about seizing property and money, only buying back the guns. -"and paying them back with their own tax dollars" Tax cuts are a reward. Tax money is definitely better used to remove guns from the streets than to sink into the already overinflated military budget. -"Finally, what if people resist? Are we really going to have an armed confrontation over a pistol?" Personally I don't think confiscation is necessary. Between voluntary buybacks, stricter requirements for gun purchases and better laws to prevent straw purchases the number of guns in circulation could be reduced over time. However, if it comes to the point that there is an actual ban on guns, the answer to your last question would be "yes". Many people have already shown that they are willing to have an armed confrontation about very silly things, including someone they don't like ringing the doorbell, using their yard for hide and seek, or even showing support for the pride community. These people will eventually have an armed confrontation anyways, so it might as well be against law enforcement that is ready for them. This way no innocent people are killed.

🤣🤣🤣🤣 take it easy fanboy. This guy will get eaten in the world of politics

😂dumb normy Democrats.

He did, this is a rerun. There's still a strike, and Trevor's in South Africa.

Journalists are just glorified paid advertisements. Colion Noir is a lawyer. It's like pitting a toddler against prime Tyson.

Colion would destroy Trevor.

Then what would you call people from America genius, Mexicans are from Mexico Canadians are from Canada, this is a general saying that is used around the world

The answer is very simple. The gun violence problem has nothing to do with guns. It is a cultural erosion issue. One that has been caused by the same idiots that focus on banning the tool. Societal rot. People need to stop looking at politicians as the rescuing hero and see them for the villians of the story. Then things will make more sense.

It's to further their agenda. If they actually enforced gun laws currently and / or kept criminals and repeat offenders in jail, we wouldn't be talking about this to this extent. Crime and violence is inevitable, but if they actually care about safety. They would do what I said before and stop focusing on disarming lawful citizens.

False. A lot of people involved in shootings have this thing called blame the person and not the inanimate object. A lot is silenced by media because it doesn't fit the narrative.

Cops won’t protect your home. Only you can.

You can't ban or regulate bad intent

yup. thats what it’s gonna have to take. those guys are gonna have to have there kid shot and left on the pavement unfortunately. nobody cares till the problem hits home for sure.

​@@rzwitdauncutYou're free to move elsewhere to a place with more authoritarian control. Goodbye, be sure to write. We'll miss you.....

No, this is a rerun. He's in South Africa doing stand-up.

Republicans love to call names, point fingers and ignore the truth. Once Bernie was labeled a socialist, he became a pariah. "Democratic" socialists reject most self-described socialist states and Marxism-Leninism

What would he have changed exactly?

@@porfiriato84 Bernie is based. Everything he promises is capitalism with extra step and would've been a disaster, but at least he's based.

"The only way to regulate guns is to amend the Constitution." Like Gaveys 28th amendment, which has zero chance of being passed. You do understand that by proposing that you are admitting that they are constitutionally protected by the 2A. Otherwise, why would you need to amend the Constitution to make it constitutional? You get what I mean?...

The thing is though, it's an amendment. By definition, it can be changed or discarded without harming the Constitution.

What you suggest literally requires the second amendment to be repealed. Registration is federally prohibited under FOPA. Why can you not leave your family or friends your personal firearms?

​@@1911GreaterThanALL A Constitutional Amendment allowing the regulation of firearms is the only way to even begin to tackle this issue. I was suggesting that one possible way to remove from circulation firearms already in circulation would be to disallow passing them on, even when you die. There is no easy or fast way out of this, even with an Amendment. Too many firearms are out there, and there is no way to regulate them or remove them.

@@johnnywest5445 So essentially make the country less free is what you are arguing for?