That part where the guy pretending to be a woman implying a real woman who can’t have children isn’t a real woman is very insulting.

I was once a man trapped in a woman's body.... Until my mom gave birth to me. 😁

My 10 year old daughter is hearing the crap out there. I am a outdoorsman and overtly masculine. She is my little side kick, and I take her hunting, fishing, and shooting all the time. She came home one day and asked if she should be a boy because she likes doing these activities with me. I explained that she is just a girl that likes to be outdoors with her daddy like so many other girls. It doesn't mean anything other than that. I went on to youtube to show her channels of girls that love the outdoors and are very girly at the same time. It made her feel better. The poison is out there more than ever parents. She has clung more to mamma since then. I think some of the worry is still in her head. My wife teaches religion at the local Catholic school. She gets all sorts of questions about this stuff from the kids. They have whole lessons now to combat this warping of the mind.

I'm a Veterinarian and a medical doctor, defining male and female is easy - XX is female, XY is male in all mammals and most vertebrates, period. I love when transgenders bring up Turner's syndrome as proof that chromosomes can produce confusion. Turner's syndrome by definition only occurs in males - read a medical book. If a Y chromosome is present, then the person is male (Turner's are XXY, so are by definition male, though they may have some secondary sex characteristics of females like breast development and female body shape). If there's a Y, its a guy - SCIENCE! Also, when I was in medical school transgender was considered a delusional disorder. I can identify as a bird all I want, never gonna fly.

Walsh hit the bull's eye when he said that these people see being female as nothing more than a costume (and a wish). Exactly!

Matt Walsh: “What’s a woman?” Confused weirdo person: “I have no idea, but I’m definitely one of them.”

I once thought I was a woman trapped in a man's body. Good thing I overcame gender dysphoria.

As a woman who's 8 months pregnant. Yeah most of us females find this insulting. I've never felt more like a woman than right now with a bowling ball on my bladder.

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 We need MORE Matt Walsh who are not afraid to say things by their biological name in this case. On the other side so disappointed and sad to see more and more Psycologist who are not doing their job, like this one, who supposed to be there to help preferred to used a double standard not helping at all. There are so many vulnerable (kids, teenagers and young adults) confused with all of this thanks to people like these.

9:30 as an anorexic-in-recovery i appreciate that example, it's an example i often use when talking about transgenderism. just because someone sick identifies as "fat" doesn't mean you treat them with liposuction - you try to heal their mindeset with therapy.

Can we all just take a step back for a second, and look at how absolutely insane our society has become? The fact that we're having to have these debates at all is crazy. Seamus from Freedom Toons was saying something along the lines of, "As a teenager in the pro-life movement he was hopeful about the future. Now as an adult, he's having to explain to other adults, the difference between boys and girls."

What I find to be hypocritical or conflict of interest is they call gender a social construct, but at the same time they claim it as fact. It cannot be both.

Walsh mentioned to Matt Fradd that a lot of the conversation was edited out. Something to keep in mind… also, thanks for saying that not everyone has to debate the same way. People shouldn’t be policing tone or style of debate.

Walsh didn't give a circular response of "a woman is a woman." He said a woman is an "adult HUMAN female", and female is not exclusive to humans. It's a biological term that is used across species (i.e. DOE, a deer, a female deer). I do think Trent gave a more careful definition of "female", but don't think Walsh was far off. There's nothing wrong with Walsh saying a woman is female. Just like saying a doe is female is correct; we're losing the biology of female-ness. While also often, and sadly, losing the dignity of what it means to be human and made in God's image.

For what it’s worth, Matt Walsh DID bring up the race identity question but it was cut for time in the final version (see Pints with Aquinas interview).

15:23 yea this is the most ironic part of the whole ideology. it reduces men and women down to meaningless labels and stereotypes. its a shallow, regressive approach to gender parading as something more

My godson loved playing with dolls as a young boy, which made his little sister happy. He grew into a high-school athlete, spent 8 years in the marines and is now married to a lovely woman. And the alpha male in him is a marshmallow with his kids. He's an awesome, sweet, nurturing, but also protective dad. So glad he was born long before this insanity and his mother was not a looney who assumed his playing with dolls meant he was gay or born in the wrong body.

Your definition of a woman was great. Thanks for this video. If we as women are going to survive this cultural craziness, we need tools like these to make our case in the public square.

My almost 3 year old grandson says he´s a big girl now. He doesn´t know what he is saying; he says that because his 4 yo sister says it. Such a shame there are people that would think he identifies as a girl.

While I agree with you on almost all the points, I think you were wrong when saying that Adison had a good comeback to Matt. No, he didn't. A ten year old knows that if a woman cant have kids it doesn't mean that she is not a woman anymore. What? She suddenly becomes another species??? It's like if in a war a man gets his genitalia blown off, does this mean he's not a man anymore? He still is, only with a disability. But still a man. This argument is ridiculous and juvenile, and only shows the depth of their introspection and understanding of this.

"Woman" and "female" are not synonyms. "Female" is someone who, under typical circumstances, can produce large, immobile gametes. A "woman" is someone who, under typical circumstances, can produce large immobile gametes AND who has reached adulthood. Girls and women are both female, but "girl" and "woman" are not interchangeable, except in the most casual sense of the words. I do really appreciate that you address the XX/XY aspect of the argument.

I support Walsh in not further engaging the “what is a woman” debate. It would have detracted from the point entirely, which is the gross insult transgenders foist upon women by calling us “an umbrella term.” What a hateful statement that is. And what a hateful way of thinking to consider my body, my God-given biology, a matter of argumentative reduction. Walsh did great.

Adult human female IS the definition. And he did elaborate properly on that. He explained it perfectly. Abnormalities aren't a rule and don't change the definition.

I think the transgender movement confuses (perhaps on purpose) gender identity with gender roles (women clean, men drive trucks, etc). I agree with questioning gender roles. Nothing wrong with that and many of those gender roles I would agree are socially defined (social construct). That's critical thinking. However a feminine man with long hair and make up is a feminine man with long hair and make up.

I'm glad Walsh spoke up about such nonsense. I have always said, I don't feel like a woman, I am a woman, it has nothing to do with how I feel. Feelings can change and often do. When we allow our feelings to hijack our intellect we can just about justify anything we want, and we're off to the races! I refuse to buy into this they, them, she, he, I will treat all people as we should as a child of God, but I will not enable them in their delusions. To do a would be un-Christ like!

I think "adult human female" is actually the best definition. Because it takes away the social construct aspect of the arguement. We classify animals as females and males. And its very easy to use scientific classification as an argument.

Nice to see someone comparing gender dysphoria to anorexia, I think that's the good way to remind ourselves to stay charitable while still defending truth

24:20 Addison does not have a good point… transgender movement is not talking about intersex people (Turner syndrome or Klinefelter syndrome) or those who’ve lost their reproductive capability. We are talking about biologically normal people. Addison’s was not a good reply. Don’t let the other side obfuscate and control the narrative.

Something that bugged me about this whole thing is how people like to say "if you do x and like x then clearly you are x." Luckily, I myself know who I am and have never questioned it. I know I'm a woman who likes to wear my hair short, (sometimes would have it shaved at one side) or that I can relate more to most men than I can to women, and that I have always been a bit of a tomboy. There are times that I like things that are more feminine, but this has never made me question whether I'm a male or female. I remember one time at work, a customer kept calling me sir despite the fact that I don't really look like a man at all, I just had short hair. My facial features and structure are still very feminine. I politely said "I'm a girl," and he apologized and said he wasn't sure because of this day and age, you can never be sure. I just laughed and let it go. Another time, I had someone talk to me about what I identified with because they didn't want to be rude, and I just kind of looked confused because, other than short hair again, I am still very female in appearance. I said I'm a girl, I've just got short hair because I'm a tomboy, to which they said "Oh, sweetie, there's no such thing as a tomboy. You're just confused about your gender and are most likely a trans who is being told by society that you have to be labelled as a "tomboy." I explained that No, I knew I was female, I just liked doing things that some would consider more masculine, but I also like to be cutesy and adorable as well some days. And then I get told "Oh, so you're gender fluid, that's all. Don't let society label you, be who you want to be. More people are a part of the LBGTQ+ than they realize." I was completely stunned at how to react. They said don't let society push their labels on me, but that's exactly what that person had done, pushed their label onto me. They make you think that you can't be just a man or just a woman if you like things of opposite gender. They want to take those stereotypes away, but then live by them too? Why can't a man like the color pink and be a hairdresser and put on make up and not be considered gay? Why can't a woman shave her head, wear tattoos and not like to dress up without being considered butch? Why is it that men and women cannot enjoy the things they do without people telling them "that makes you x or y"? I think it's hypocritical to say they don't want to be labeled as what their biology says they are, but they are quick to label others.

Love Matt Walsh, his clear thinking and reasoning, we need more like him.

15:09 Spot on! As I say, drag is to gender what blackface is to race. A completely degrading portrayal of the person being imitated.

Some people have said about Walsh that his tone is not charitable, but I think we are at the point where we need to be turning tables and fashioning whips. “The final confrontation between the Lord and Satan will be over family and marriage” Sister Lucia

Thank you for actually bringing up conditions. I was born with trauma to my brain due to complications during delivery. I know that conditions can be extremely unusual and difficult and not obvious. Most people I meet have no idea I had a severe condition as a child and still have permanent effects from it. There are conditions similar to the one we’re all discussing now. And you’re right that one that is very similar is called Body Integrity Identity Disorder. It also begins in early childhood, the patient is not psychiatric-has rational thoughts, and they also feel like their body is foreign to them. And in particular it’s that a limb is foreign to them. They admire amputees-those that have the body they desire. They experience extreme emotional distress. They recognize that their feelings don’t make logical sense. All of this is exactly the same as gender dysphoria. Exact same symptoms. But those of us with conditions can learn to cope and do. We don’t tell people with body integrity disorder that the body they’re in is really not their body. We tell them the truth and get them the support they need to cope. We can focus on what we can do and not on what we can’t do. Every person on earth with an incurable condition needs to learn how to cope. If my parents and everyone around me had lied to me about my condition then I never would have worked so hard and actually gone through the painful but absolutely necessary process of learning how to cope. But my parents always told me the truth about my condition and even forced me to do things that were basically the equivalent of climbing Mount Everest for me. Forcing me to work very hard just to learn how to read and write. There were teachers who told my parents that I would never learn to read or write. But I was evaluated by the top medical experts in children’s health and basically they found I could learn but had to do so in a different way. For example I couldn’t learn my ABCs by just visually seeing the letters. I had to write them in sand. Etc. People with conditions need to get actual help and support. I went to special education, went to therapy both speech and regular therapy, etc. And my results are unquestionable. Many people thought I wouldn’t ever do anything. But I literally went from the worst to then eventually joining the regular classes and then graduating top in my class in high school. I still have permanent issues. Hand tremors, I literally have a brain wired differently because my brain formed new neural pathways around the damaged areas-which is what your brain can do at a young age while you’re still developing. And why going through therapy and education like I did at a young age is very important. I therefore do literally think differently than others. But I did learn and I did cope. And many many other people do too. Everyone has limitations, even those without conditions. All of us have imperfect bodies. But you don’t focus on what you can’t do but on what you can. I believe in God and someday we all will no longer have these conditions. But in our current life we can cope with them and focus on what we can do instead of only thinking of our condition and what we can’t do.

Very good definition of woman! Another thing that surprised me from the Dr. Phil video, was the text underneath of the transgender panelists. They placed "non binary transmasculine" or "non binary transfeminine", and that seems such a logical inconsistency, because they are using words as masculine/feminine to identify themselves and at the same time they claim to be neither by saying they are non binary. They destroyed their case right there, imo.

The reason this is so important is because control of language means you control truth…redefining what word allows you to control truth…”human” in abortion… “marriage” in same sex debate….”women” and “man” for gender….it’s about deconstruction and relativism. I would love to see an episode about these connections!!

The reduction of “woman” to stereotypic symbols such as high heels, nylons, hair is fetishising women. And let’s not forget autogynophilia (AGP)… These things go hand in hand.

It is for attention, plain and simple. Shock value. Matt is 100% correct. And Phil is a coward.

This was my take-away, as well, that Matt didn’t seem well-prepared to define _female._ The definition I use is: FEMALE: any member of a sexually dimorphic species who possesses a reproductive system which when fully mature and functional has the capacity to gestate and bear young. This avoids all the usual rejoinders: post-menopausal, prepubescence, sterility, hysterectomy, chromosomal and intersex objections and so forth.

My sister use to want to be a boy, she didn't like to brush her hair so she shoved it under a hat. Decided this was as good a reason as any other to be a boy. She hit puberty like most kids do and the hair brushing became second nature as a young lady. Leave these babies alone... You will answer to God

Addison knew exactly what a female was when he asked Matt what he calls a female or cisgender woman who does not have reproductive organs. His own question to Matt contains his answer and exposes that he knows exactly what a female is.

Matt Walsh's approach is the best approach; you have to bring it to these propagandists. The days of taking it easy with them are over.

What I want to ask Ethan and Addison is, what is it about a woman that makes you know that you are NOT a woman? You have to at least know what something is in order to know that you are NOT that thing.

We need more women to discuss publicly these issues with members of the lgbt ecc. community.

As a young boy I would sometimes play with dolls… and make them fight each other

This trans nonbinary activist is obsessed with his physical body, how he looks, how he is different from everyone else, how he is special, and if course he is indirectly a victim, so we always have to listen to his wisdom and never challenge him. He is literally insane but the current social situation is to breed and embrace victimhood everywhere possible.

I was once a male trapped in a female's body. Than I was born.

Here is something I am confused about; Why is it that when men transition into women, most of the time they don't want to be known as a woman, they want to be known as 'trans' or a 'trans-woman'? Is that some sort of subconscious admission that they can never actually become a woman? Why go through all these surgeries and hormone therapies in attempt to become something you wont even fully embrace or identify as? I'll admit, some of them do actually like to be called a woman, but we often see them proudly referring to themselves as 'trans' before just 'woman' as if being trans is more virtuous title. Idk man. Thanks for the insight Trent!

As a person in stem who works in genetics most of the people who have the conditions you mention are the sex of their genitalia (their puberty matches their sex). intersex does not mean ambiguous genitalia, most don’t know they are intersex until they want to have children. Children born with ambiguous genitalia once they hit puberty their actual sex will be known, and they usually go with the sex that matches the hormones. These numbers are very small although there are people who are not in the field try to twist the numbers, because most people have no real understanding of the science. So confusion is easy.

Good critique! I was also a little disappointed that he dodged the question, but I think it was deliberate on his part in order not to let the opponent sideline the main issue.

I dont agree that Walsh evaded the question if you mean it as a cowardly move. The person asking that question was evading answering Walsh's question and trying to lead him down yet another what-about this exception to the rule argument that wastes everybody's time and is so disingenuous. I was glad Walsh evaded that tact and stuck to the point.

I appreciate both styles, but am very assertive in my approach and as such identify more with Matt Walsh. I think he gets the point across quickly and accurately, drawing everyone in, instead of prolonging arguments. He cuts straight to the chase. Not everyone is intellectually inclined, so the Trent Horn approach might put people off, that aren't into mental deep dives. I love to listen to your debates and podcast, just as I enjoy listening to Jordan Peterson or Sir Roger Scruton but I know that all of those aren't capable of reaching the mainstream, because they like to intellectualize and most people don't appear to be on that path.

I just think it’s crazy that the lady was talking about how some women don’t like to vacuum as if most women like to do that and used that as a basis for transitioning. Liking “feminine/masculine” or doing things that are typically in a different gender role, doesn’t change your gender. It’s just you’re into different stuff. I when I was young I used to love painting my sisters nails cause I love art. That didn’t make me a woman or even gay. The whole argument is just sexist in and of itself.

What’s interesting about Walsh’s definition of woman (an adult human female), is that it’s only circular under our worldview because we believe female and woman are essentially the same. But in transgender ideology, female and woman are not the same (one is a sex term and the other is a gender term). So personally, I think Walsh’s definition works just fine and is not circular according to his interlocutors.

This episode is very helpful. Thank you for taking the time and effort to make this video.

I’ll tell you how it feels to be a women. It feels natural to be a woman . Feeling comfortable in your woman body. Loving and excepting how you feel in your own body and mind. That’s been with you since your birth. Being a women is not something that you can put on or take off. Your either a woman or your not.

Trent, your definitions of a woman and a man are brilliant! I wish you could "take on" a Dr. Phil episode one day. I feel like your argument would be a slam dunk! 🙌

Another response, or more of a retort if you will, to Addison's "What about women who can't reproduce?" question to Walsh is "Exceptions to a rule don't disprove the rule."

I also heard him say that he was not going to engage in their art of throwing the conversation back to him.....to deliberately avoid answering the question. He was adamant that he was just going to focus on getting them to answer that question without allowing them to confuse the debate.

My daughter played with both “boy” toys AND “girl “ toys. She’s 17 and has decided to go into a predominantly male profession in college but she still loves to dress up in a dress. I’ve never pushed her one way or the other. But I have had other parents try to tell me she must identify as a boy. I’ve had to tell them that she’s simply a girl who has varied interests..

the truth can be a shield to those who wield it. but it can also be a sword against who deny it. -

Walsh has refined his definition of woman as " a person who is of the nature to get pregnant."

Congrats on this video! Having become one of your most popular on the channel

A car with a missing battery is still a car - not a train, so even if a woman is not able to have children she’s still a woman, or, if you lose your leg, that doesn’t change the fact that you are still a part of human (biped) species - exception does not define the rule

I was fired from my job at Ubisoft Toronto for speaking against the harm of trans ideology on women and children. On social media, outside of work, with no mention of work. I encourage everyone to boycott Ubisoft (they also shuffled sexual harassers around on the inside instead of firing them -- sad that standing up for women is more likely to get you fired from Ubisoft than hurting them).

I agree with you regarding the definition of female and the fact that Matt could have handled that question better. However, just to quibble, he wasn't being circular in his response. Saying "a woman is an adult human female" is not the same thing as saying "a woman is whoever identifies as a woman". We all use to instinctively know what "female" meant until two minutes ago, so there was no need to go into more detail. The truth is most people haven't thought about what it is exactly and you can't blame them for that. What I find funny about the "femaleness is a construct" argument of these activists is you could say that for literally every word we use. They are all "constructs" in the sense that their meaning is determined by what we agree upon collectively. A minority is trying to tell us that the way we collectively understand femaleness and maleness is wrong, trying to abolish it, and offering nothing in return. If they can't propose a better definition (other than the tautological "whoever identifies as such"), then all they are doing is whining.

Excellent analysis of the debate!

thanks for going into depth and I am definitely sheltered because I didn't realize that the lgbt had soo many things behind it now. I do not believe we can "choose" our genders. My son played with dolls when he was little, I did not tell him he was a girl. He has long hair now, but he likes it long, he doesn't think he's a girl and laughs at people who call him one. He turns around and says, "No, I'm a guy. I just like my hair long right now."

Walsh isn't my favorite but you're right - he has the testicular fortitude to go on a show and do this. But man I would much rather see someone like you on there, Trent.

Matt's definition is not circular. Female and woman are not synonymous. There are female animals. We do not classify them as women. "Adult Human Female" means that the only females that we classify as women are both human and adult.

It’s insane that we even have to discuss and explain this to the crazy masses

"I am not a ___ because I don't identify with that." I guess taxonomists are out of a job.

I love this!! You put it all so well

I don’t have any problem with Matt’s definition. I would’ve said, matured adult female, but what he said was fine. I think what Trent defined was appropriate for “female”. And to be considered woman, you have to be female.

With the chromosomal abnormalities it is really simple, the presence of a Y chromosome makes you male. It doesn't matter the developmental differences or the extra presence of X chromosomes. Females with development probles are still FEMALE. Males with androgen receptor issues or glands that don't produce testosterone are still males. The issue I have with your definition is that 5 year old girl mention. She, by definition is not a woman because she is still a child, just like a boy is not a man, he's a boy. We have different words for developed vs developing humans.

Great video! Thanks for juxtaposing this issue with anorexia. As transgenderism typically manifests at around the same stage in life as anorexia, it’s plain to see that both are expressions of bodily narcissism, and a typical component of narcissism is to popularize lies or half-truths, to draw in others to agree with them. What’s ultimately sad about this population is the consistent tendency towards self harm. You brought up the high rates of suicidal ideation. A big problem is that health professionals tend to separate that from transgenders willingly going under the knife to be mutilated, as though that doesn’t classify as self harm. If we just look at the example of Phil Ochs, we can see that as soon as someone denies their own name, it’s the first step towards self harm, because it’s born out of self loathing.

All of your points are so well thought out and so well articulated, it appeals to logic and common sense, even the lowest common denominator would find your words incredibly convincing and persuasive. It is voices like yours that we need now more than ever in these times. Mad respect brother. ❤

I've watched those clips a few times now and I always focused on Matt and the men/women on stage. Your breakdown made me focus on Dr. Phil. He was silent the entire time. He went through the trouble of over explaining transgender ideology; that always bothered me. But now I see he just might have did all that to lay the ground for Matt to say exactly what he was thinking without being cancelled! I would still never watch his show but this time I can see he just might not be as phony as I once thought. Thank you.

You make so many great points, I loved listening to you talk about this and breaking this down. When this nonbinary whatever it is said that a woman is an umbrella turn, that pissed me off a little. As a biological female who goes through true womanhood (breast growth, periods etc) it got me upset cuz trans women don't know what that's like and they get treated better than most real women from what I've seen, it just angers me.

I kinda blame Surgeons. They set this whole thing in motion. In stead of saying that the person needs therapy.

Thanks Trent, it was wonderful listening to you...

24:30 this objection is easily dealt with. The objection presupposes that "female" is a definite description, but if you take an essentialist view (either a modal view like Kripke or a classical realist view like Aristotle and Thomists), then the objection goes out the window. On an essentialist view, a term isn't just a collection of properties and so if you lack a property you aren't the thing anymore, a thing is defined with reference to its natural kind, so a cat with a missing eye, ear, and leg is still a cat even though it lacks things generally had by cats (four legs, two eyes, two ears) because it still falls under the natural kind as a _malformed_ or _disabled_ cat. An infertile female doesn't cease to be a female then because it lacks something that women naturally have, she would simply be a physically malformed female. Science presupposes essentialism, because otherwise you couldn't specify phenomena as physical or mental _disorders_ at all.

Actually here in Australia you’d be amazed at the amount of white Australians who identify as Aboriginies simply because they have one in their ancestry. For example just because my maternal grandmother was 1/8 aboriginal does not make me aboriginal, but it seems a lot of people can’t comprehend simple arithmetic. 40 to 50 years ago it was fashionable in Australia to find a transported convict in one’s ancestry, this Aboriginie in one’s ancestry thing is just a modern update on that. Problem is having a aboriginal in one’s ancestry no more makes one a aboriginal than having a convict in one ancestry makes one a convict. Of course no one claimed they were convicts simply because one had one in one’s ancestry, they just claimed they were descended from a convict. Yet today it’s not uncommon to find Australians claiming they’re aboriginals simply because they have (for example say in my example) 1/32 aboriginal ancestry.

Enjoyed this video! Appreciate the minor corrective you provided. I'd just note the possibility that Walsh's response to addison may have been truncated due to editing. It almost seems like there may have been something more he said in response to the question "what about women who are infertile?", but it got cut out. I could almost hear Matt beginning a response, then suddenly it goes to him saying "I've answered your question..." I could be wrong, but I'd suspect some editing there.

Great analysis, man. Love the video.

Thank you Trent and I really liked the book Made this Way! I think everybody should read it whether or not they have children! God bless you!

He made this point, but it was cut. There was a parent raising a non-binary child and he asked her this question. She didn't answer, thus it was cut cause it would probably deserve a "clap-track".

Another informative video, Trent, fantastic analysis.

Im so glad you did this video and for your involvement in these issues. Both you and Matt Walsh for his courage. God bless you and praise The Lord 🙏🏾🙏🏾

Thank you for the video! Not 100% agreeing with Matt Walsh on politcs, but this was a great appearance of his!

I can't believe all our technological advancements in recent history and we are now debating what a real woman is. Ludicrous.

Matt Walsh mentioned in a video that some things were cut from the broadcast.

You made very good points and it made me think. I'll certainly use some of your arguments if the need presents itself. Keep fighting for the Truth.

Walsh did not evade the question. The question was answered in his definition. His definition just didn't include health. You’re doing the same thing but in a more complicated way.

When the audience clapped for the “non-binary” speaker, I wanted to throw up. I wish any of them had the sense to understand what they were clapping for. Society is doomed.

Trent I'd love to hear your take on the gender discussions new polity has started and their take on biological and psychological definitions of sex and gender.

Thanks, Trent! Very helpful commentary on this topic.

28:33 precisely WHY we need to have Mandatory Anatomy & Physiology class put back in high schools. ALL high schools, I don't care if they are public or private.

Excellent. It's all about objective truth. You cannot say you believe in science and than refuse to see the obvious biological differences between men and women...

Amazing commentary. Subbed!

is the book johnny the walrus translated in french? i want to buy it for my little brother