Didn't quite make it... tumbling back to Earth soon. Hold on!

Lol this is is ideal for rockets with cryogenic propellant. Most rockets are ice cold to begin with lol

me too. i pray for the day a russian flag can be flown next to my american flag.

It’s easier to keep the propellant cool :-)

It’s the best rocket launch ever I adore the snow beeing shoved by the power of those rockets 😂 😂

You know that rocket failed and it crashed with earth?

@@jamaz80 😉

@@jamaz80 every rocket fail,no one is perfect,spacex failed until it was a sucess.

its not ksp-ish design in russian rockets, but a-la-russ design decisions in KSP.

now its gonna hit earth in hours.

@@lapiz_ Shit happens 😁

@@bastianocles Hope that it lands back in Mother Russia😈

@@bastianocles You Russians getting to big for your boots

@@lapiz_ 1) Shit happens to anyone on Earth. 2) Russians have many more achievements than british in space and astronautics, so respect. 3) Im impartial, I do not have preferences of some countries over others. 4) Im not russian nor a fan of them... but by your wishes you seems like a classic pirate. 5) I hope one day your country will return the Islas Malvinas and Gibraltar, as civilized people that you claim to be.

Soyuz struck by lightning kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jMV8q7eJx9rXn2Q.html

Sure but then most rockets don't have a failure in their third test launch

Not yet. Still hasn't proven itself reliable.

@@air_ That and its not what id consider new, more like massively delayed. Like even worse than sls delay

sls still delayed until 2028 😂​@@nuckerball1259

@@andreikoto4810 I understood what you are writing about, I didn’t notice it before, apparently because of the larger number of starts from Kazakhstan.

Preprogrammed avoidance maneuver.

AKA Power-Slide™️

Similar to the Saturn 5 and its safety yaw maneuver to clear the support tower.

Angara'nın neresinden? Yukarı Ayrancı? Aşağı Ayrancı? Ortada hani bi tane park var ordan mı?

well, this is set to replace the Retired Proton-M rocket... The Soyuz will stay in service until its successor Soyuz-5 'Irtysh' is built which is set to replace it. Angara A-5 is heavy-lift launch vehicle which I dont think is economically enough to be used for normal regular spaceflight missions. Instead, it will be used for future intra-planet or heavy lift missions.

@@prathamdwivedi4769 Yeah this wont be replacing the smaller rockets like how falcon heavy doesn't replace falcon 9. Its sad we wont be seeing this thing launch hardly ever unless something large needs to be lifted

Thank you for noticing, it was corrected. The 2020 launch is here kzfaq.info/get/bejne/b7mHirR_nJvRiGw.html

Isn’t the PTK NP there Orion clone?

what moon? this was another failed launch, the payload is spiralling back to Earth, the engines failed.

It is not yet clear what happened to him. He cuts circles.

Here's what the official ones say in our media: The rocket successfully delivered the Perseus upper stage with a satellite mock-up into space. 12 minutes after the launch, "the orbital unit consisting of the Perseus upper stage and the inseparable overall mass layout of the payload separated from the third stage."

когда полезная нагрузка сначала на орбиту начнёт выводиться :D может, батутом их..?

Hopefully in the near future hopefully it won’t take as long as SLS

@@uladzimirdarozka3882 убогий, что ты исходишь ядом здесь? Зависть? В твоём недогосударстве не то, что ракету, швабру теперь не могут сделать...

Ну в принципе они уже идут. Тот же Спектр РГ, он выведен в точку Лагранжа L2. Это Российско-Германский проект. Есть иностранные проекты. Наса несколько лет назад выводила Parker Solar Probe, этот аппарат уже находится довольно близко (по космическим меркам) к Солнцу. Так что в принципе эти аппараты уже идут. Но во-первых такие проекты реализовывать очень не просто, а во-вторых нужны не только эти проекты. Поэтому чаще можно увидеть не такие запуски. Типа та же МКС может очень многое дать, а это огромная куча запусков однотипных, где просто выводятся космонавты, а затем грузовой корабль. Хотя вот недавно был запуск Науки (ну относительно недавно, в июле), это новый модуль МКС, уже не просто запуск Союза.

@@dawk8833 речь не об этом. Межпланетные исследовательские космические аппараты

Испытания Ангары А5 прошли удачно. Что позволило запустить её в серию. Персей это разгонный блок, для которого это был 1й испытательный Полёт. Это доп нагрузка а не цель основных испытаний.

@@user-ts2mt9og4j можно ссылочку на сайт?

Как невыносимо гадко и совестливо стало на душе, что у России до сих пор есть космонавтика, не смотря на все визги и завывания диванных любителей космоса, любителей ЮРЫ и прочих покорителей Марса. Доколе режим будет их терроризировать успешными пусками? Ведь хорошо известно что летать в космос могут только специально отобранные люди со светлыми лицами на прогрессивных многоразовых ракетах, а всяким отсталым совкам там нет места.

@@StelzCat Эту ракету начали разрабатывать в 1992 году. Я тогда на 3-м курсе Академии Можайского учился, за это время отслужил на "Байконуре" успел поработать на "Гражданке", 30 лет прошло. А они только 3-й испытательный пуск произвели. Мало того груз макет то расчетной орбиты не довезли, болтается сей час между 180-200 км. ....... Однако каков прогресс!!! Или все же деградация?....... Но результат все же есть. За это время бабла распилено!!! Аж дух захватывает от радости и гордости за Роскосмос!!! И кричать нужно не "Юра-мы все проебали", а "Юра мы ещё не все распиздили"

@@dmitrydishev4950 в серию НЕ пошла. Комплекс Ангара без последней ступени, такой как Бриз или Персей, Минобороны не нужен. Что привело к потере Персея должна установить комиссия по расследованию. Потом надо провести ещё одно испытание, чтобы подтвердить, что весь комплекс работает. Потом будет серия.

ateşlemek ister her bahtı kara

gururlandım...

No, the payload, the 'Persey' speedup block + a mass-mockup make are already to its way for a point on the geo-stationary orbit. Everything is OK and working by a pre-computed schedule... What are you smoking?!

@@maksimluzin1121 As per Space Launch Report: "Russia's third Angara A5 test flight got off to a good start after launch from Plesetsk Cosmodrome on December 27, 2021, but its Persei (upgraded DM-03) upper stage failed to perform the second of its three planned burns, stranding itself and its IPN-1 Kosmos mass simulator payload in low Earth orbit, far short of the planned geostationary orbit expected after a nine hour mission."

@@noecarrier5035 , so far, we don't have any official reports from the Roscosmos agency, so... The main goal-list of the test was the 'A5' rocket carrier itself, the ground launching infrastructure, the telemetry and control systems. The payload was 'Secondary', even the weight-dimensional simulation, not a real payload. The 'Perseus' upper (speed-up) stage, as a member of payload, did worked out the first impulse, for sure. They will figure out why the speed-up stage became the 'died' after it, by the telemetry ... The rocket 'A5' itself entered the reference orbit, and the payload was separated from it successfully! There are no questions about the rocket and the supporting infrastructure! The launch of the 'A5' and the operation of the launch preparation, communication and control systems - just were perfect and absolute successful!

@@maksimluzin1121 Yes, it seems like everything went fine with the booster itself.

@@noecarrier5035 , Well, don't forget about the launching infrastructure, control and command posts, communication and the management of all of it... The test was not only for the rocket 'A5', but for the entire infrastructure! The payload was dummy and experimental, 'secondary', by the check-list.

Yeah, the new stage they were testing (persei) failed to put the dummy payload into orbit. (Or at least proper one)

@@AeonExploration yeah, it failed to relight for a 2nd time leaving the payload in LEO

well, this in not fully success, but it not fail. Fail if that thing explode at start.

@@trololoev I meant the mass simulator wasn’t put into the correct orbit

@@qwertyeet yea, i understand, but it (shame that it failed) look like if Angara fully failed, like if it explodes in the air or something. But it is her cargo, who failed, not Angara itself.

there is not such a thing

@@bastianocles Are you sure ?

@@danielarias9047 para que hablas ingles con ese nombre

@@danielarias9047 claro que estoy seguro, la union sovietica se desintegró en los años 90.

@@bastianocles El reportaje esta en Ingles no ? El sector de la defencia como el de los asuntos esteriores en Russia son pro sovieticos, como el pueblo ruso en mayoria. La base industrial y cintifica de la rusia es todavia base sovietica que guste o no. El futuro es socialismo o ruina.

Which failure, what are you smoking?! The payload on its pre-computed trajectory to a point on the geo-stationary orbit already!

Русская народная поговорка: "Стыдно тем, у кого видно (кое-что)" (с) Журналисту, который сотрудничает с американским СМИ "Радио Свобода", нужно верить в последнюю очередь. "В Минобороны отметили, что все предстартовые операции и старт прошли в штатном режиме. Ракета успешно доставила в космос разгонный блок «Персей» с макетом спутника." (с)

Don't talk nonsense if you don't know. They forgot to report to you personally. Or is it a toad that presses you that everything is fine with the Russians?

If believe to Anatoly Zak, then new module for ISS Nauka launched this summer exploded, then fall, then lost on orbit because engines not worked, then because of lack of fuel and so on :D It is low quality source of news. It is officially test launch, but made by army. What we know - that we know nothing about goals, what really tested or launched. And Zak a-priory can’t report anything. If he could, then it meant somebody in same day already were in jail for spreading of classified information. Basic logic and impossibly situation. Also exist basic universal rule: when you see somewhere “anonymous source”, in 99% cases it is just fantasies of author. In case of Zak it is 100%.

Ничего не путаете? Так-то он слабее Сатурна 5, Н1, Фалькона Хейви и т.д.

@@user-vw6ix9rg9k наверно имелось в виду на керосиновом топливе.

Нет насколько помню, Фалькон Хэви мощнее. Надо цифры поглядеть.

@@eraserstp | Falcon Heavy мощнее

@@eraserstp , ...и один пуск по полной стоимости - 2 млрд. долларов.

What do you mean “first”? O_o After dissolve of USSR? For last years in Russia created whole bunch of new rockets: Yars, Bulava, Sineva, Lainer, Nudol (fastest in world, reach height of ISS orbit in less than 1 minute, video of it launch is incredible). Also few new modifications of existed rockets and almost ready Sarmat (if I’m not wrong in next year) and Kedr. Yep, all for military purposes, but first man in space also flew on ICBM. Military rockets in most cases even more interesting than bored rockets for civilian purposes.

Tá zuando né?

@@juliap.5375 those one you named, are missiles, not space launch rockets! and yes he meant after soviet!

@@quasaristmagnetar2658 No, they are space rockets, some weight hundreds tons, and in future will be used to launch satellites by conversion programs, they just deliver ‘warm light’ instead of satellites/people. Classical ballistic military missiles like Iskander (can fly at height of 100 km, de jure also space, so-called Karman line) created much more and I’m not mentioned them.

@@quasaristmagnetar2658 there is no real difference between the two. A missile is an object that is forceably propelled at a target using mechanical (or chemical) means, most missiles use rocket propulsion, solid rocket at that.