sounds like a bad idea

@Eli D I heard that starpping weights to yourself is bad for your joints.

joako p weighted pull-ups ftw

jotap customs as soon as you add weights to your body or lift weights, it’s no more calisthenics. It becomes weightlifting. I am sorry.

Dharma73 incorrect. Weighted calisthenics is weight lifting.

That's some sweet advice .....

^ that's the hammer hitting the nail perfectly on the head. I train my body for sex. Medium cardio for 45+ minutes of extreme pussy pounding, calisthenics for holding strong positions for long periods of times, and bodybuilding with med-high reps and muscle isolation for physical attractiveness. I fuck 3-14 times a week and I fight once every 10 years (if even that); you do the math...

Cmd Ctrl sounds like you should make a fitness DVD I'd be first in line..no homo..

it's on the horizon

Cmd Ctrl lmao 3-14 had me rolling

Me: *cries in 135*

me: cries in 240 and weak af lol

@@FirstLast-gk6lg time to start bustin ass then

I am 5.9 and 175lbs. I wish I was 155

@@ninetymilesaway 5'8.5 155 wish i was 175

Agreed :) lovely comment 🔥😍🤗 too right 🔥😌

Wow.Really awesome advice bro.

Couldn’t have said it better.👍

I agree sir. Good comment!

This comment should be at the top. Well said!👌🏾

Wow that's badass, thanks for sharing

You idiots it’s Kali

get some... Love Patty Mac on this issue

Thats such a weird statment since when i was in the military it doesn't equal freedom in my opinion freedom is doing what yoy want discipline is being in a routine

@@sadsad7184 It's a flashy slogan mostly because it's an oxymoron, but it's not what it really means. Jocko did explain that total discipline is obviously total absence of freedom. But there's a certain balance of freedom and discipline where certain amount of discipline will yield more freedom than was sacrificed in the first place. Say, I like music. I have freedom to fuck around and not practice. Or I can sacrifice some of that freedom and practice my instrument. After certain amount of discipline applied I'll be able to play songs that I like when I want, which is a new kind of freedom. I guess it's just a new way of saying "No pain, no gain."

@@sadsad7184 I get it, when you train to be uncomfortable you are able to handle life struggles alot better and able to take on the world better...through functional training. I train in this fashion by doing burpees almost every workout. Burpees are the most functional cuz of the whole getting down and getting back up kind of deal...not to say expect the worse but to prepare so when it comes you're already over it, true story.

@@arlenparker5138 interesting comment. I just started doing burpees and they indeed are alot harder than i thought. Great metaphorical workout though.

It depends on your goals. Being overtrained is not a good thing either.

Yeah i feel like calisthenics is better than weights as you get functional strength as oppose to brute strength.

as somone who use to box a lot Calistinics where the bread and butter, but once i started doing barbell training I started growing actual strengg and mass, Im not a very big guys so ill never get "jacked" but i look better than I did when I only did the pull ups dips, pushups ect, But I like both.

@@davidjd123 I think nailing calisthenics with some weight training for legs for awhile is great and then after some years depending how fast you progress you can do more weight training or weighted calisthenics to keep that natural look but gain the mass you want

@@davidjd123 You can gain mass doing calisthenics but you have to go slow on you’re reps instead of doing as much raps as you can you need to pressure you’re muscles

@@Student0Toucher we'll you won't gain mass as quickly either, weighted calisthenics is the way to go as it promotes the need to grow, that is when you of course exceed your bodies limitations at that time.

That's interesting to hear, I rarely met anyone who's lifted consistently for such a long time. Would you mind elaborating on what you meant by feeling bouncy and quick?

@@lembartjellico5926 probably more agile and light on his feet

@@rampagesmackssons508 I suppose, you'd assume wouldn't you. Just felt it'd be nice to hear from his perspective since he's a veteran in the iron works so he'd be able to present the differences in benefits from two different training principles

@@lembartjellico5926 I lifted weights/bodybuilding for about 15 years before switching fully to calisthenics... I can relate to the post here about feeling "bouncy and quick" after training only calisthenics for a time... is because you essentially drop "excess" bodyweight once you dedicate yourself to moving your body through space, so you naturally feel lighter in everyday situations outside of training. What most people who lift weights/bodybuild don't acknowledge often enough is how much of a factor diet and calories are to increasing your "size" and that *much* of that size requires one to put on excess body fat... It's because of Instagram that people naturally assume lifting weights to get huge = all that extra muscle mass will be fat-free lean tissue and you'll end up looking fantastic... sure, there are some genetic superior individuals who can indeed put on much size and have it be mostly lean muscle and they'll look amazing - but the majority of people will simply end up looking "softer" the more "mass" they put on and the heavier weight loads they push or pull. Calisthenics is the opposite of this... a lean state is a *requirement* to increased performance progress, there is no such thing and gaining body fat while increasing body movement efficiency through space.

@@davepazz580 Very elaborate, thank you very much good sir

mmafan3 if things don’t have to be so black and white, why is the video?!

@soldierside365 A E S T H E T I C

@@soldierside365 I haha'd

resistance 4 ps5

Literally no.

@@oliverallen5324 For muscle building it is. Intensity is the difference. Calisthenics gets easier, so you need to do harder exercises. With weights you can add weight.

This is a stupid comment lmao

@@rodrigolinscaldas3305 I know them. I meant that basic exercises like pull ups and push ups get so easy that you need another challenge

basically everyone that ever got serious into fitness have had some sort of injury, its part of the learning process, it humbles you.

I agree. It would be very interesting to hear philosophy and ideas on the ins and outs of swimming...

The thing is, the kind of swimming the Seals do is not enjoyable or pleasant at all. They try to "drown proof" the soldiers by binding up their legs and arms and tossing them in a pool. Sometimes, they even hold their heads down underwater just to add more stress. Some soldiers have died in training because of this. That's why I couldn't go through with Seal training. I could do the running, lifting, shooting and what not. But if an instructor tried to keep my head underwater, I would probably bite his finger off just as a survival reflex. I can definitely understand why he wouldn't want to talk about swimming.

Look up the combat side stroke , it's dope , it's a way to swim with out leaving any wake or sign that youre there

@@TheDocbach I've seen that kind of comment before. It's kind of funny that someone who didn't even go through the hardest/longest training course in the military thinks they can bite the finger off of an experienced operator (because BUD/S instructors are SEALs who've rotated to that duty station) and not immediately get destroyed for it. If you didn't go to BUD/S because you knew you weren't strong enough to make it through the 6 month course, that's one thing, but don't go around saying that you didn't bother going because of some obscure reason. At least own up to it.

@@Daynknight1001 Not wanting to be drown like a rat in a pool is an obscure reason? I think I already admitted that I couldn't handle Seal training. Not sure why you are trying to misinterpret my comment, but I have 100% respect for the Seals. And I never said that I would be able to bite a finger, I said I would attempt it as a survival reflex if I was in that position. The point of my comment was to inform spiritual astronomy about some of the training the Seals do, and why swimming may not be as enjoyable as it may seem. It wasn't aimed to make myself sound like a hard ass. I can do certain things well but I am in no way claiming to be a Seal at all. So please stop trying to bend my message here. Thanks.

Lol

god bless the crossfitters

What are peds?

The holy trinity

@@eliascontreras1951 perf. Enhancing drugs

*What are peds?* They are like these little socks you wear when you don't want people to see you are actually wearing socks...

CircaSriYak SEALs: All before chow...

So? That does not take anything away from weights

Big facts

With weights you're doing that too if you pick the right exercises and do them with the right range of motion

zorkan111 I think it's a great question, don't see the need for criticism

wah wah wah woe is me

because to a lot of people, who seem to spend a lot of time online, everything is a competition.

zorkan111 agree

A good workout program will include both free weights and calisthenic movements. If you only do calisthenics you develop upper body strength- and especially core strength, but your legs WILL be seriously lacking. If you only do free weights, you don't have a good understanding of how to move your body through space efficiently. I tinker around a lot with how to do different kinds of big sets, and yesterday did 400lb deadlifts for reps> pull ups to failure> archer pushups to failure (w/ no rest between exercises). I'm including more bodyweight movements like archer pushups because my dumbbell pressing has gotten stronger, but it has not translated well into my ability to do a simple calisthenics movement like the pushup. Be a chick- mix and match!

Same here man been powerlifting for years started calisthenics 2 months ago and I feel stronger than ever 🙌🏼

@@MOOFAZAA your power lifting programming can't have been great. No hate but how are you supposed to get strong legs without weights? It's IMPOSSIBLE

@@getstrongby4038 I use weights when I do legs and I got an 1100 total at 160 pounds. It ain’t great by any means but I’m definitely not weak

@@getstrongby4038 explosive leg movements can make your legs ridiculously powerful and strong. Jump squats, explosive lunges ect. Even routines such as 50x bodyweight squats and doing uphill sprinting immediately after can really strengthen the legs.

@@getstrongby4038 strong legs without weights? Try walking..... people squat more than their body can actually handle moving around with. Squating more than what your body can physically handle with movement is useless compared to being able to have the muscular and cardiovascular endurance to go 30 miles. It's all relative to what the goals are of the person in question.

Nice prototype guts

My goal is to swing the DragonSlayer

Yup. Both serves their purpose. As long as one do work.. one will get the reward

As a powerlifting enthusiast, I respect calisthenics. Sure they are weak with chicken legs but they are still training.

@@im_reyz8780 yikes

@@im_reyz8780 ..Lol

@@im_reyz8780 Is it chicken legs if it's proportional to the rest of the body?

💯

Facts

Try bjj if you never did

Yawn

lol u haven’t tried wrestling

anthony ruzic I’ve tried both and they are both respectable, but swimming is super hard, especially since you can’t breath. Wrestling however is harder on your body physically ie mat burns etc

I know my friends in high school that wrestled were super fit.

What workouts did you do?

No such thing as "functional" strength. You are enough strong enough to complete the task or you are too weak for the task.

Calisthenics is great for body control and functional strength in the sense that you're doing more natural movements that also have a great carryover to almost any kind of strength demanding sport or activity Weights on the other hand are better for muscle growth as they are more specific movements easier to overload and you can train certain specific muscles that are very hard to target with Calisthenics. It'll also give you more absolute strength which can also be very functional (the ability to lift external weight) I find Weighted Calisthenics and Weight Lifting combo the best. Basic to intermediate Calisthenics exercises with weight (Pull Ups, Dips, Push Ups, Squats, L Bar Rows, Pike/Hanstand Wall Push Ups, Lunges, etc)

No one that does crossfit will say kipping pull ups are the same as normal pull ups. I believe David Goggins is still the record holder for most pull ups in a day, and he did it strict. Kipping pull ups are gymnastic/crossfit specific so you're never gonna see out outside of it. I honestly would rather people stick to strict pullups.

Theodore Smith they are timed which leads to bad form

"Crossfit" absolutely encourages, teaches, and promotes using good form. I see you're actually not talking about proper form for legitimate concerns like snatch, C&J, etc... you're just harping on the tired arugment of "pullups aren't correct" Strict pull-ups are taught, and practiced. in the sport of Crossfit, they allow specifc variations of pullups like Kipping or "butterfly". They are sport-specific exercises.

This comment is so wrong lmao. Go look at the top level Crossfit guys/girls and tell me they have bad form. Tell me Mat Fraser has bad form, please try. Yes there are people who do crossfit who have bad form, as there are people who do powerlifting who have bad form. You walk into any gym in the world and you will see people lifting weights with bad form.

Theodore Smith You are wrong, it’s not 2009 anymore. Nowadays high level CrossFit athletes have excellent form and even in gyms you see good form. First rule is “leave your ego at the door”. The sport has evolved. Coaches have evolved. The training methodology has evolved. Skiing in 1910 was poor form, gymnastics 70 years ago was nothing special, running was so slow. CrossFit is here since 2000 and everything has improved so much.

Weighted Calisthenics (Relative strength and natural more functional movements) and Weight Lifting (Absolute strength and to train certain specific muscles and find overload easier in both primary and secondary exercises) Both will make you more explosive, muscular, stronger with your weight and with extra weight and at the same time develop smaller muscles to improve balance coordination and make you a highly functional athlete.

me too

Did they do calisthenics?

carlotapuig eating

Right. Real calisthenics is weight training.

@@kylehuggins179 yes off course. Body weight training

The closest thing to bicep curls in calisthenics are arm curls on either suspension straps or gymnastics rings (there are a few variations of these which do hit the biceps directly)... Spinal erectors can be hit well enough with hyperextensions (back raises), reverse hyperextensions and even bridges... these are probably better overall than deadlifts in the long run as you won't be putting unnecessary strain on your spinal column.

He doesn't exactly say "this is what I do on this day" but in one of his books, I can't remember which one, but it has a subtitle of "the field manual" and he maps out different workouts in that.

Cody R Pull ups

J K I like both

Your core, CNS, ligaments and joints can.

What

John Sharkey Psychopath.

BIG COUNTRY209 he’s asking whether having a dog is worth it.

But that's exactly what he's saying. Your body's telling you "no more" to those but that means there's other things you can do instead

I have herniated disc too.. Im 25y old.. You can do alot of other exercises that dont damage your back like walking lunges.. It is better than squats in my opinion

@@Spladoinkal many excerises are injury inducing look at the weoghted dips one of the best excerises but many people experience pain from it

@@unnaturalatrophy8073 Agreed

yes but in calisthenics by definition tou seek to make your body beautiful, that's the same in weight lifting. the separation is stupid for sure.

@@lelieutenant7386 Incorrect, training for aesthetics is only one of the many reasons people lift. Weightlifting, powerlifting, strongman, crossfitt, calisthentics ect.. is all about performance in various aspects and *not* trying to make your body beautiful as opposed to bodybuilding for example which is.

"useful" strength lmao. What's usefull is being able to lift heavy things off the ground and over your head = weight lifting. Calisthenics gives you more useless* strength

Only feasible after getting out of your contract.

Niceeee!! Figuring out what works best for you is key!

I’m 17. Idgaf

Before highschool i would do lots and lots of push ups and pull ups. Soon as I benched my freshmen year I was ahead of everyone in my class by a fair amount

That advice only works for people who are thin enough to be able to productively train calisthenics. For plenty of people, it takes years to be able to reach such a lean body fat percentage, and research shows resistance training is useful for dieting down and staying there. Meaning that for large segments of the population, your advice is simply not feasible. 90-95% of diets fail (as in people bounce back), and building lean body mass with weights to begin with is an excellent way to make diets stick. For the fatty who's just starting out, I'd prescribe compound weightlifting movements in addition to some cardio. Calisthenics would just be an excellent way to destroy compliance in a setting where compliance is the most important thing they need.

It depends how overweight someone is... the obese can get a hard enough workout simply by walking around more often. I don't think "diets" are the answer so much as learning about better eating habits in general, which is why most diets fail. Where I disagree is that somehow *only* thin people can do calisthenics... Every single calisthenics exercise can be regressed to become very easy... it's not as if there is only one standard version of a calisthenics exercise that is valid and productive. That would be like saying weight training only works for strong people, because a weak person can't bench press 400 lbs. That idea would be nonsense, since a weak person would of course start off with bench pressing a lighter weight then build up from there over time... It's the exact same with calisthenics.... you start with a simpler version of an exercise where you are only lifting a small percentage of your bodyweight, then progress to lifting more of your weight (by modifying the exercise) over time. While you could theoretically lose body fat with diet and stay in great shape by building muscle through weight training and cardio, I tend to favor calisthenics as a better choice for long-term weight maintenance. The reason is that becoming better in calisthenics and increasing your performance over time *requires* one to maintain a very lean shape... you simply cannot get better at moving yourself through space without likewise keeping your body fat level in tight check. In contrast to lifting weights, where you could get really strong and increase your performance to no end while *increasing* your body fat percentage.. meaning that one does not impede the other from happening. Of course if you lift weights, you could do cardio work and reduce your calories... but understand these things are not related to the goal of lifting heavier weights and becoming stronger. But with calisthenics, getting stronger and more efficient at moving your own body directly relies on maintaining a certain lean shape... otherwise, no progress can even take place at all.

@@davepazz580 All of this sounds good, but in my experience fatties actually enjoy lifting weights much more in practice than callisthenics because they're actually pretty good at it. A normal fat person will for instance often destroy callisthenics people at back squats without much effort. Which is awesome for them, while it might take years to even do simple things like a single dip or chin-up. I like using both like Jocko says, but for some reason callisthenics people, who are already typically naturally skinny to begin with, are dogmatic about getting other people to exclusively do an exercise form which will suit their naturally chubby body less without caring about what other people actually enjoy.

Don't misunderstand... I'm definitely not saying everyone should do the same form of exercise out of some dogmatic obligation. I'm one that believes the best exercise is the one you personally enjoy doing the most, the one which gives you so much pleasure to do that you actually look forward to training. As long as you have achieved that, it really doesn't matter if you are doing only calisthenics or only weight training exclusively... people tend to make too much of the "doing both" concept (which I don't believe to be fully possible anyway, but I digress), it's all just training in the end and in the long run, it's not going to make much difference anyway. Though I'm not sure I can go along with the idea that people who do/enjoy calisthenics were "naturally skinny" to start with and somehow that's why they gravitated towards it. That would be like saying that accomplished weight trainers who can bench press 400 lbs. were naturally big to begin with and that's why they started lifting weights in the first place... Ignoring all the underweight, skinny guys who eventually increased their calories and got strong enough to push the same weight loads over time. But I agree that an overweight person could back squat a much heavier load right away over someone who does calisthenics only... because all that excess weight serves to better leverage heavier loads. Which goes back to my previous point... if your primary goal is losing body fat and keeping your weight in check, there is nothing inherent in the act of lifting heavier and heavier weights in and of itself that will move you in a leaner direction. But in calisthenics, it's really mandatory...

Patrick Wedow hehe

Hehe

@@gregorygalmin9756 They don't, because they only recognize the stimuli that you are giving them, however, your mind muscle connection does recognize it.

miguel111093 lmfaooo if that was the case, bodybuilders would only do body weight movements to grow...LOL dumb ass

They don't , but it is a difference betwen pushing a weight away from you( or pulling towards you) and pushing yourself away from it. ( Or pulling yourself towards something)

*if that was the case, bodybuilders would only do body weight movements to grow...* Not really... When the goal is pure muscle size gains as fast as possible and nothing else, weight training is a far more direct means to achieving that and offers a much simpler way of progressing than calisthenics does. But after all is said and done, bodybuilders aren't judged by their absolute largest shape but how they look onstage as lean as possible in a competition... And that requires cutting calories to a very low level... without anabolic drug help, your muscles are going to shrink *way* down anyway. Totally drug-free bodybuilders end up with a very low bodyweight once they have to hit the stage... they seriously could have skipped lifting weights all year and just done bodyweight exercises and ended up looking exactly the same at that point.

DavePazz you have no clue how bodybuilding works lol to think bodybuilders could use body weight exercise to prepare and for a show is pure nonsense hahaha. You could never use calisthenics to build the size a bodybuilder does even if you had all the time in the world due to the specific training methods used to start with.... In terms of cutting for a show, name me one bodybuilder who has ever been successful on stage who has used body weight to prep for a show? You’re so uneducated that it baffles my mind haha

If something causes injury and slows greater progression then he would stop. Why do something that can slow down gains vs something that gives same benefits but less injury and faster results?

Chk my channel. Stretching is secondary benefits of yoga..

Pretty sure his muscles said that lol

I see where you’re coming from but you can definitely get a hard workout in with just high repetition with only body weight and their tons of variety to it as long as your pushing over ur limits you can see good gains 4 sure

@@basicchriss6974 I don't disagree with you. I'm just saying that if you want to have the best possible body that's genetically available to you you are selling yourself short if you avoid weights. Most guys want to look like natural bodybuilders and it's extremely frustrating to grind for years only to have the same nagging gaps in your physique keep you from reaching your best look and doing simplified powerlifting workouts or religiously sticking to calisthenics can help waste years of your life in that sense. You also have to consider that as we get older we accumulate wear, tear and injuries and some body weight exercises are just too intense relative to the gain to do anymore like pull-ups for example. When you use free weights and machines you can pinpoint the needed resistance down to half a pound and go straight to the muscle instead of putting useless and distracting burden on your joints as is required in some bodyweight exercises. If you are naturally lean and masculine looking you might luck out and have a nice body with body weight only but you'll never reach your peak that way. Any guy that starts out with average genetics or worse is simply doing himself a disservice by avoiding weights because he might never look even 'nice' by doing that. Body weight stuff is most useful for young, short guys with zero injuries.

@@miesvaillanykyisyytta3252 well tbh if your goal isn’t aesthetics and more strength and stamina focus the only weights you should really do are deadlifts, farmers walks, and maybe split squats. Everything else can be body weight for high reps(push ups, pull ups, air squats, sprints).

I'm not ashamed to say that I have a pretty bad genetics but my goal is having a bigger body and I only do calisthenics. Is it because of my choice? No, I don't have the money to get a gym membership nor do I can afford a heavy weights. It's is out of my control and I can't do nothing about it until I have enough money. I do and improve what I can by buying some extra equipment and hopefully, gets a better financial life. Btw, from my experience, high volume calisthenics is very effective for hypertrophy. Try it.

@@miesvaillanykyisyytta3252 I use resistance bands and weights (on my back etc using a backpack) and I'm great with just using calisthenics