guys I just want to apologize for misattributing starry night to warhol instead of van gogh - I’m very face blind and my name recollection is terrible, and I never went to art school so please forgive me for one mistake I made 😅

Did you just say one of the most legendary paintings in history, Starry Night by Van Gogh, is by Andy Warhol and is called “A Silent Night?” 😭

She did not just disrespect Van Gogh like that- 💀😭

That's not Andy Warhol. It's Van Gogh's Starry Night.

People need tho realise that AI did NOT create this type of style, it stole it! So yeah, some "AI type of art" are still real artists

99%: It's not any warhol its van gogh 1%: Actually talking about the topic of the video

"they accurate only fifty percent of the time", and when you chose randomly, you are correct 50% percent of the time, meaning they are total bullshit haha

I hate how AI had ruined the art community. Now we got people throwing false accusations at one another.

I think the biggest crime AI has committed when it comes to art is that now... almost any glorious-looking piece of art can easily be mistaken for AI slop. It's like the very existence of AI art feels like it's just there to fuck with people's minds. Mocking them and making things feel like a "who done it?" mystery.

That’s what scares me about ai almost as much as it replacing us. It’s people accusing us of using it. Thank god for auto timelapse recordings

Calling someone’s art AI when it's not is the new popular form of bullying disguised as providing a public service in the art community.

....Andy didn't make Starry night..... You meant Vincent van Gogh Right?

this AI shit dropped in the art community and ruined everyone's perception of skilled artists and even possibly beginners. now you have to be "perfect"

4:10 Did you mean Vincent Van Gogh's 'A Starry Night'?

AI artist's "I MADE THIS" :Regular artist's "Wow i did a good job time to post thi- "HeY tHaTs Ai"-edit OMG I GOT 622 LIKES

Coming from a programmer, AI checker are the same as asking the weather/future to Aunt Irma and her crystal ball. You will get an answer for sure, but certainly not an accurate one.

What I hate the most about this is theirs a big difference in how they look. Real artist with their real artworks have a more rough and obvious brush strokes that Ai can’t do right. Ai is normally more blurry and dreamy and unrealistically smooth. If you notice like a pen mark shape like a transparent circle or the layers of brush strokes. It’s very much real art. Artist nowadays need to post receipts and their art process and stuff just to reassure people it’s not ai.

I feel terrible for whoever is accused. There was a bit of proof in that art it was made by real means and being accused of having A.I. just because of a checker is like saying a TV is a monitor. And maybe even if it was A.I. there has to be proof of the art like that Vigo person had proof, and not by some A.I. Checker. P.s. The picture you analyzed with the stars is. Van Gogh’s Starry night.

Nice Video But the art work at 04:10 is The Starry Night from Vincent van Gogh ^^

Oh, I think its because the detection thinks the flakes are "stars over clouds". Especially since AI tend to overcrowd an area and blur the periphery of the focus. It was such an easy way to spot it but machines cannot separate which is stars and which is snow, dust particles, light refraction, glimmer, or stars.

When AI pretty much exploded like a year or two ago, I saw a lot of pieces that looked like my fan art. Especially Batman and Poison Ivy pieces. I didn’t think much of it cos I know I didn’t have any rights cos it was fan art. I stopped doing digital painted pieces cos that’s what seemed to “look AI” more than the inked and colored ones. Granted I’m not exactly top tier but I had fans. I’ve been a comics illustrator since 2004 and joke’s on me cos I haven’t had a paid commission in like 2 years cos “AI is cheaper”.

Another not so fun fact about Poligraph Test: A lot of Serial Unsubcriber pass the Poligraph test because they can maintain their heart rate in normal level.

AI-hunters cause more harm than AI-artists. How many times do they need to do this before they learn?

I've followed johisart for YEARS now and I can tell you with 100% certainty that their art isn't AI and it's sad to see people accusing them of using it. You can literally look at their art from before AI art was a thing and know that they're genuine. And uh... that painting is Vincent van Gogh's Starry Night

Wrong painting name, wrong artist name

All future artists should be required to include a speed paint with their submissions. That's what I did with my painting I submitted to the contest. Problem solved.

I expected this to happen long ago, artists will incorrectly be labeled as using AI, and artists keeps on giving them methods that aren’t accurate nor will they see the nuance of multiple problems vs a single problem by either inexperience or simple mistakes anyone could do since we aren’t infallible, they just fling around wildly and only hurt everyone in the process.

I wish my art rendering is good enough to be accused as AI art

A Silent Night by Andy Warhol...

I googled "asylum night andy warhol" and Starry Night of Van Gogh appeared. What happened??? O.o Edit: I am confused with my google search, I am not mocking her

Andy Warhol? TIL the Campbell Soupcan guy painted Starry Night.

Andy... Warhol? He was like the exact opposite of an artist. Probably would be an Aibro

Yeah, at this point when someone accuses me of "prompting," I tell them to prove it. I'm just a terrible artist but I write and I can mimic writing styles. Even had a professor accuse me of it. Before this became a norm, I had to prove that I used what they taught, in a class I paid to go to, to back up my work.

I'm the artist of the Eevee painting in question, thanks so much for bringing awareness to this! It sucks that generative AI stuff is destroying people's trust, but like you showed too it's so easy to just do some quick research on the artists' portfolio and history.

It reminds me of people accusing unbelievable video game skills as bot.

As an artist i can tell immediately

Even my art came out as AI made. Even tho I made it years before AI art even arrived

It's almost like witch hunting is bad or something.

because of idiots going rampage saying "your work is AI because of the other machine I used for this argument", I got scared and started to post art streams (when the internet upholds or timelapse to show i'm not using ai.

Is not a matter of pointing and using tools to spot AI. You must investigate the author if it has a portfolio and see if the style is consistent across all their work, so they are able to repeat it. If it's a random person like this Vigo without an online portfolio or the rest of the portfolio is filled with easy to see AI patterns, that's a red flag. That's also another reason why many programs has timelapse features. You can keep those to later demonstrate you made everything from scratch. Make use of it.

Oh yeah, art I did over 10 years ago gets flagged as Ai. Music I composed over 10 years ago, same thing. ...Btw, I did a college dissertation on Vincent Van Gogh. It's a shame he never got any recognition for his work while he was alive.

5:25 The internet doesn't care about context clues is the issue, they just always assume everything so like 💀💀

If you glaze, or nightshade your work it becomes flagged as AI as well, futhermore Glaze and Nightshade are being broken regularly like every 2 months, so it's shit and not a protection. If you really wanna protect your work you want to export it in 700x700-1000x1000 resolutions when posting publicly and post the higher reses for patreon. Also lower reses also work wonders hiding your mistakes and is perfectly suitable to view on social media. USE IT.

i cant believe we have to do this now...

AI is destroying art in so many ways, not only stealing from and replacing artists but creating mistrust against real artists as well, I hate it

Andy Warhol Made Starry Night? Girl, seriously??

1:30 Also if you enter Art into these checkers you submit this art to be used to be trained with. It's in their TOS. So by checking artists pieces in this thing you expose them to be training data. Same company also offers image generation with a self trained high quality model.

this has nothing to do with the video, but i got kinda annoyed with 1:22, you say that people put their "written work", and after that "same thing with art", i mean writing is an art. Art is not just drawing, it's also music, writing, architecture, video making etc. I don't blame you at all for saying this because sadly nowdays all other form of art excluding drawing / painting lost their "art" designation, but I find it quite sad for artists who produce another form of art than drawing. Anyway apart from that it was a very good video you explain really well, I wish you the best for the future of your channel :)

i think now a days if you're gonna submit art that they should make you submit a step by step process as proof that you made the artwork. which will take out the ai ppl

I remember last month I was posting my drawings on Cara and 2 of them was spoted by the website as being AI, when in reality those were both traditional arts that I made on paper with ink pens and colored pencil, and I had the w.i.p. pictures to prove they were real if it was necessary, so it's hard to trust these detectors since they can detect wrong and tag as AI works that were actually made by a human being.

Ai have create a witch hunt in internet where instead of witch people hunt for ai

It's hard to believe anything is real anymore.

ignoring the miscredit of Starry Night.. The AI calling the real artists the fake while getting away with using those artists, my mind thinks of the story of King Minos who imprisoned Daedalus as a conspirator only after he had built the labyrinth to imprison the Minotaur; there’s a mean to use the imprisonment to keep them silent but also their control. I’m not the camp that adamantly opposes the AI as it’s still young and being developed by many with various intentions, but it is with its development that society is also going to shape the morality of the tool itself. We artists can’t do anything to stop AI from existing or functioning, the real battle is the few who intend to exploit it and devalue the artists that fuel it; and i fear they intend to make it so artists don’t value themselves enough to keep making the stuff they want. that’s what i get from the AI calling real artists AI while calling the AI real art, it’s not a fluke but a manipulation tactic

i put a couple of my artwork in the ai checker and some come out as ai and some did not, i don't think the technology is there yet to see if a piece is made with ai or not just yet

It's sad to see the artist behind one of my favourite warrior cats covers to get accused like that

So ai checkers are pulling a reverse unos... unless there are ai errors that are noticeable...

johisart always been one of my biggest inspirations, so i def felt like it was their style that was ripped off i even think that eevie (or similar anyway) art has been online for way longer than AI even been a thing too bad they were dragged into it, i hope that most people are able of thinking with their own minds not just asking a program

I just a test with an AI checker, one with a drawing I just finished today and another with a photo I took and photoshopped last year. Both results were zero. These checker tools are useful for sure but are by no means flawless.

The fact that People are now ACCUSING great art of being ai is proof of how scarily good AI has been getting at it.

i put a ai image of a cartoony dragon into the ai checker and it got a higher human rating then one of digital paints which is crazy!?

If MidJourney Stole my arts . Then he begin lost on sels 100%😂

it’s strange how people either don’t notice AI or have falsely accused an actual artist of using AI just because it’s shockingly high quality.

Those web sites that detect AI images are unreliable, because you can take any non AI generated image and still make the website detect it as AI. 1.- Take any non AI generated image 2.- Go to your favorite AI image generation service 3.- Use the img2img function to let the tool process that image with virtually no changes. 4.- Take the resulting image to your favorite AI detector and it will likely tell you that there's over 90% chance to be AI generated. Now you can use that to smear any artist you don't like. This AI witch hunt is hilarious as I expected with folks accusing real artists of using AI because another AI tool in a website told them.

in one or two years it will be 100% impossible to check if art is ai or not considering how fast mistakes like hands or or backgrounds not making sense are fixed. two years ago it was hard to get a decent ai image and now its hard to tell ai and real art apart so what will happen in one or two years from now? its just sad tbh but there is nothing we can do about it

I tried one of those AI detectors, and it thought two of my entries were AI generated even though they really were not! So I had to make TikTok videos showing the layer breakdown of the three images, to show that they are the real deal. Since AI art can’t make layers like a photoshop file.

Vincent Van Gogh was a Dutch artist that made starry night and was a post impressionist artist. Andy Warhol was an American artist who did pop art like the Campbell’s soup cans and the many prints of Marylyn Monroe.

Art checkers will say paintings are fake.

After watching your first vid about this, I learned about AI websites and decided to try one of my drawings in it. 89% is what my handmade drawing got. I was so sad. Thank gosh these aren’t accurate, it can really wreck a hard working person’s image quickly.

I have checked 10 of my painting in a checker. 8 came as human made, 1 was 50/50, 1 AI. Everything was made before AI was a thing.

This is why I hate AI. Some people shaft real artists with AI and some artists get falsely accused of using AI. You can never be sure these days.

3:26 Where did this list come from?

My art doesn't look ai generated but man i'd be so sad if anyone ever thought my art was made by ai

I upload one of my art in a Ai detector for fun and it's saying 56% Ai, like wtf loll

oh i tried those AI-checker in the past, almost ALWAYS wrong! i put arts of that are made by famous mangakas before gen-AI was created, the "checker" would almost always say they are made by AI, usually hitting 70-90%

bruh these AI checking tools are a joke. didn't knew they existed so I gave it a shot. it has major issues with paintings overall. It told me my art is AI lol. I feel so bad for people who get accused.. especially high detail work and paintings. Ive seen it repeatedly now. Thankfully not something i had to face (yet).

kat…please cover the filian drama !!

That AI tester thing or whatever don't just mindlessly believe it and put your art work on there who knows that thing also one of many that stole your data and train AI 🤷🏻‍♂️

I feel like the number in the ai checker would have spiked if it was a Salvador Dalí painting

whenever i make art and consider posting, always thinking i would be accused of using ai… -_- whoever is TOO good at making art is now accused of using ai.. since ai only references good art

i thought the video was playing at 2x speed at the start lmao

Johis does beautiful art. They are legit. They've done a bunch of GORGEOUS covers for Warrior Cats books.

I love Andy Warhol's classic work, A Silent Night 🤣

I think artist should also post speed paints these days

i don't know who Andy Warhol is, but that's Vincent Van Gogh

The art is genuine there's no extra toes or messed up eyes or globed up leaves or flowers

Yooo love your videos it makes me want to get into art

You know, the HIVE one tends to be really accurate, and I've tested hundreds of sourced samples... But there are so many different AI generators now, and they update the detectors to cover them. So accuracy has been on the decline because of this. Something I've noticed - if you generate noise in your artwork, it is more likely to get flagged as AI. Noise adds texture to things, and makes artwork look a bit more similar to a photograph. For some of my art, I do looping visual effects videos, and my most recent one has a fair bit of noise, and stars generated using old After Effects Starburst effect. I had it tuned so that the stars were too much like noise, and out of curiosity, as I do with all of my art (which is not AI by the way), I threw a screenshot (one frame of it) into HIVE's detector, and it threw a 91% positive AI result (which is a first for me, I'll be honest, I was surprised) I went into my project file and adjusted noise parameters a bit to make it less "noisy", exported it, and grabbed the same frame once again. That time, it was more accurate, with a less than 1% reading. I still had noise, and it didn't take away from the piece to adjust it that way. Just be aware that excessive noise is probably a culprit, especially for seasoned digital artists that like to use noise in their artwork for effect.

Andy Warhol?!

1:55 I tried that thing with a flipping shaded blob I made in ibis paint x and it said 70% ai...

People still use AI checkers to see if the image was AI? Wtf?

The thing about ai art is they have no idea what proportion and persepective so everytime I try to learn to draw from other art I have to check is it ai or not otherwise am gonna learn a mistake

Funny and Sad that most of the "AI artist hunted" were just professional Artist that just got falsely accused by a random account on social media that do it for exposement and then use the hype to announce their commissions and patreons. Most of AI Detection Tools use the deep learning trained algorithms to detect color patterns, shapes, and textures and compare them with trained models made with humans and AI images to give you a result. Even some said "Likely" when give you a result because is not 100% accurated. You can upload a smartphone photo with some beauty or HDR filters and it will give you "generated by AI" result.

btw..thats vinmcent van gogh..not andy warhol. -facepalm-

my school recently began using an AI and cheating program to check if kids have plagiarized, used ai, etc. Its accuracy is horrible if you use a quote from somewhere correctly but a random college student also uses it it will flag as plagiarizing a private paper. It also takes common phrases like presidents names and will flag them if anywhere on the internet also mentions that name. The AI tool for art seems to have the same level of accuracy

This is why I look for the original artist online who come up with a specific artstyle, since Ai copied from the actual artist to steal their style. Ai can’t come up with its own style.

Like I know it’s van gogh Im an art history freak, but like mistakes happen and the author of the video answered the comments and explained that it was a mistake. So lets Chill out its not like it killed anybody XD. We all make mistakes and call things wrong names especially if we aren’t reading a script but just talking. The vids Great and the author respects art. She just forgot one thing and explained it to people. And the topic of the vid is not art history so She doesn’t Come Here like some art history expert. She’s just a human being.

I just put an ai gen drawing into this "ai checker" and it said its 95% human. Oh well...

1:15 ai checking if an art is ai

Thinking about doing a lie detector test with my huge anxiety problems gives me anxiety XD

4:21 sorry andy warhol? Just for correct credit, that painting was made by Vincent van Gogh in 1889. Any warhol created pop art screen prints in the 1960s