I don't know if you're trolling. Ravic misses shots pretty often and his videos also show missed shots.

@@TetsuNideji kid uses aimbot and triggerbot and people defend blatant cheaters because they missed a shot? This has to be a bot poster there's no way sentient person wrote that.

@@erzr yep, totally a bot if I'm defending someone. Flawless logic. Ravic also livestreams often. None of his videos have any sort of evidence of 'aimbotting', as you call it. The vids lack any of the typical 'quirks' [associated] with such programs. He misses easy shots all the time. If he was actually aimbotting, do you honestly think he'd be missing them? Of course not. Also don't get me started with triggerbot lol

timestamp

take some copium kid

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Thanks for the comment. I was told that doing this kind of stuff was impossible on console so good on you for practicing and getting things done.

Considering the vehicle mains these days don't realize how good they have it and aren't trying to correct it in anyway, yeah I'd say it is.

No one wants to watch 2042 but we all love Ravic

There might have been in the past but now YT seems to have changed things again, more algorithms, less algorithms, who knows. Takes a while to figure out what they messed with.

On the subject of YT changing things and being weird or impossible to predict. The YT dashboard is telling me there are ZERO comments on this video right now. So are you guys like ghosts and something?

@@Ravicbot 😂😂😂

@@A2Zireael You guys are bots? Damn, fooled me.

This.

The biggest impact you can have on the end result quality on any online video platform is with the source recording quality. If you are not limited by the way you record you can record at near lossless quality and intra-frame. Doing so basically means every frame is an i frame and you don't end up with those in-between bad quality frames because one i frame turned at bad because of complex textures, fast movement, etc. in a game. I can't record in that way because I used ShadowPlay's buffer to save moments in game so I can only up the bitrate of the recording.

@@Ravic Interesting, my post render videos are crystal clear pre upload, but look 720p ish after. I appreciate you responding tho! (Link to example below) kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hbmJqqqpl7ymkas.html

The headshot damage from the 44 Magnum is heavily impacted by damage reduction from windows. It turns a one shot to the head kill into a two shot so I doubt I'll be working on that anytime soon.

DICE didn't enable it by default so the people who would likely react aren't going to know that it exists or that they need to turn it on.

This is the first Battlefield game in a long time that has anything be affected by the windows. There is damage reduction applied by the windows so anything that doesn't one shot to the head with a high enough multiplier will take quite a few more shots to kill. It's one of the reasons why it's a rare occurrence for people to get shot out of choppers in BF2042 but quite common in BF3 or BF4.

6x scope with High Capacity battery.

Nope just high muzzle velocity like how it was in BF4.

At the moment I'm playing this and Diablo 4 with mus1ck in my free time. Diablo 4 has a season coming up soon so I'll probably check it out as well.

Because of the vocal minority and I guess a ton of hypocrites that either never played BF3 or BF4 or they have terrible memories.

At the moment it doesn't interest me. It looks like mindless chaos and there are a lot of things in the game that make no sense. What I mean by that is it doesn't make sense to combine certain things into a single game. The proximity chat is funny but it's not enough for me to want to play the game. Earlier versions of the game looked more interesting but the launch version reminds me a lot of Hardline's launch and the Vector.

@@RavicWhat things is it combining that don’t make sense? Do you have any examples

A movement system that is like COD or Battlefield with an unrestricted lean mechanic makes no sense with the TTK and weapon reload times the game has. No health bar or health % makes the gun play end up being inconsistent because players end up running around thinking they are at 100% health when in reality they aren't and that inconsistency gets worse when you add on body armor to it. Then there is the building mechanic that lets players basically break map balance with how fast you can build "cover" or troll your teammates in vehicles ( you can straight up block teammates in vehicles ). I don't think the game has an identity issue like WW3 because they were clearly trying to go for the middle of the road but I think the game being in that position is part of the problem. Basically it has a bunch of arcade features combined with MilSim features that normally would never be combined. I keep scratching my head trying to understand what the developers were going for when looking at videos or streams of the game. The only thing I can think of is just an absurd amount of random chaos. I might try it at some point but so far I haven't come across anything that looks fun in the game. To clarify I'm referring to something I would find fun, others I have no doubt have found their own fun/enjoyment in the game. I might also have a negative bias towards the game because of the hypocrisy I see online. People complaining about the maps or map design, a lot of open areas with no cover. The same BS people said about BF2042 but in BattleBit's case it's still a good game according to them. The graphics and graphic quality is bad or meh but it's okay because it's BattleBit but it's not okay for BF2042 or even BFV.

@@Ravic well no shit people are going to be more on board with battle bit it’s a 15 dollar game it has the luxury of being inexpensive it can afford to have worse graphics it can afford to have more open maps there are 254 player unlike BF2042 where at launch was missing a lot of the good modes had no weapons was 60 dollars had bad maps no class system and had bad graphics it’s not hypocrisy 45 dollars should have got people a better game but it didn’t 2042 is just now getting to where most people would see it as an Acceptable 60 AAA game but if we are compare both games at launch battle it is 100X better than 2042 was at its launch

It’s also got an extremely open dev team that’s communication is off the charts also the games has a lean system like that and a high ttk because there are 120+ people you need to kill the trolling aspect of support has already been addressed by they devs and no no health bars to actually make medics a need/class unlike battlefield if people can’t tell that there screen being the color of blood means they are low health battle but is the first game they’ve ever played I’ve also got zero clue what inconsistencies with you body armor you are referring to would love to see the reference for that Also apologies for the fact I use 0 punctuation I don’t fucking with it unless it business related

It kind of depends on your region or the region you'd connect to when playing the game. Some have lower populations so the active hours of playtime are more limited than other regions.

​@@Ravicright right, makes sense. I'll look into it a little now ty for ds help

The Rorsch isn't a hit scan weapon, just high muzzle velocity. You do still have to account for bullet velocity and drop depending on how far away your target is, oh and you can't steady the scope because it's not under the sniper or marksman weapon category. Also it still manages to dust or not register on choppers that are moving even though it shows the impact on the client's screen. Don't get me wrong I'd prefer the weapon not be in the game but DICE have apparently given up trying to fix the issues related to vehicles and player's bodies in said vehicles ( see the video linked in the video description ) so this is DICE's way of giving players a workaround for the problem.