11:45 strikethrough include the original sentence because parallelism outside underlined 18:00 Consider X,Y 20:00 Rule #2 26:59 Tips 30:10 Why? provided and milked is the same type takes care is simple presents 33:47 Tips

Best video on GMAT SC. Thank you!!!

Great explanation. Would like more such sessions.

Great video...Love the explanations

The explanations were simply great! Thank you!!

very helpful strategies!!! 10/10

Great explanations!

Thanks for explaining this topic so beautifully

Thank you! Very helpful :)

Wow 3 was a tricky one. Thanks guys!

Very good webinar.

Well explained

Good video. Thanks

Got all answers correct.

Thanks for an amazing video. I have a question regarding the last question. I was wondering why it is grammatically correct to compare "small cars that are XXX" and "those at any other time". I feel like those two phrases are not pararell.

I wish I could have your voice over when I take the GMAT LOL

Great

video seen on 31st may and its good

I think her explanations make me think I have to study all grammar rules.. 😟

Nice insight ., i got .

For question no 2. Why it is ok for the modifier to start with " with N and verb ed" not the second " its water bla bla"

U r the best ❤️ thank you soo much for dis

The point is we don't have good amount of time in exam to think about all this stuff and i usually get lost and panic accumulates and everything go worse... any suggestions ? I really need help as to how to attack sentence correction..... any specific video for that

For question #5, I get the "any time" concept, but following it, is "production history", so isn't it really saying at any time in history? i.e. in the past? and certainly cannot be today or the future? Is there something else I'm missing. Referring to around 46:40 mark

39:13 Question #4 option E, there is parallelism in 'unlike' usage. Did you reject it because unlike has been used with verb and not noun? I though you rejected 'E' because of parallelism issues and not noun/verb issues.

@prepscholar, 11:30 I don't understand how "that they used to dress a statue of the goddess Athena" describes the robe. Isnt that telling you what they did with the robe - has nothing to do with describing the robe. Description to me means adjective

whaooo. amazing

On question number 5, doesn't the exclusion of the pronoun ‘their’ at the end of the underlined phrase in the correct answer, change the meaning of the sentence? With the inclusion of their, even though it might be ambiguous, it refers to a specific things production history (the manufacturers or the cars). With the exclusion of this pronoun it refers to all production history across all things, so maybe all the way back to the industrial revolution or before through today. I think this actually changes the meaning of the original sentence, and thereby, for the same reason we fail to accept D as the right answer, we could fail to accept C? While this logically makes sense to consider all of production history regarding the ability to manufacture more fuel-efficient cars, the original sentence doesn’t tell us this. It merely states manufacturers can produce more fuel-efficient cars with respect to either their individual production history or the cars, not all production history. It's clear that the meaning shifts between C and D with respect to the amount of cars vs the amount of fuel efficiency in those cars making D an incorrect answer. I'm more or less just curious if you saw this as an actual meaning shift before the shift in quantity of cars vs fuel efficiency of those cars, could you accept it. If so, we could chronologically fail to accept C as the correct answer and default to D. A simpler example would be: Today, manufacturers produces more cars than any other time in production history. VS Today, manufacturers produces more cars than any other time in their production history. At 52:20 she states that in the previous question’s correct answer, there was an ambiguous pronoun, so we should not necessarily reject the above example based on the ‘their’ being ambiguous. Further the above example highlights a secondary change in meaning between answer choices C and D. On what should we reject this meaning change? Overall super super helpful and intuitive videos, will sub to this and PrepScholar! Thanks

Q#5, Correct answer is C. However, it says, "small cars THAT are more..." - cars are plural but THAT is singular. What am I missing?

I think there is an error in the sentence: in choice A "a circumstance that contributes to 'their' depletion"- here the antecedent of their is monkfish- we are talking about a specie so the pronoun their should be its. Please correct me if i am wrong

Hi, could you please explain more about answer B- correct answer---- its as pronoun can be Subject of sec.part of compound sentences but it starts with -----{ , and with --- its 60 miles} it be object of preposition. How could it be correct would you please explain more. Also {Consider rul X, Y} what do you mean x, y, ? Do you mean x= Noun, Y= Noun then between them Linking verb? would you please explain more, thanx.

39:59 "which" MUST refer to the closes noun, are we sure? gmatclub.com/forum/experts-topic-of-the-week-6-26-17-wtf-is-that-doing-in-my-sentence-243686.html "touch rule" has exceptions

Useful Examples and nice explanation, however, you should go a bit slow----

as you mentioned that these are one of the hardest questions..so actually what was the level of these 5 questions?? 750+??

well I feel bad about my self.

When ever I try to solve questions quickly, even the most easy one turn out to be wrong and when take long time and just 1-2question then able to solve many very difficult questions. Can someone help me to handle this condition... Please suggest way out...

Are you really telling me you are able to do all this sentence manipulation in a 1 Min and 30 secs?

Thanks for an amazing video. I have a question regarding the last question. I was wondering why it is grammatically correct to compare "small cars that are XXX" and "those at any other time". I feel like those two phrases are not pararell.