😂🤣😂

Best comment

Retitle this video. Your comment has won the right.

It was pre-recorded

Shapiro can not reason very well at all

you can't debate a moderator, because they control the questions, tone and when you can talk. why moderator v. guest debates are silly.

@@u235u235u235 This WASN'T a debate - it was an INTERVIEW. Just saying...

@@u235u235u235 Then he should not have argued and simply should have answered the questions...He lost a debate he was not having

@@bensmith5581 Absolutely - and it was utterly GLORIOUS to watch wasn't it?

Imagine being led to believe this was an interview at all, rather than an opportunity to attack you, simply for not sharing the same values as the biased media.

This interviewer was extremely dishonest. He kept asking the same line of questions over and over again. Using 5+ year old content. Ben has had a daily show for years. He has a ton of content. He answered the interviewers' questions... the interviewer simply didn't like the answers, so he brought up another quote to ask the SAME question again. That's what Ben means when he says the interview wasn't going anywhere. How many times can you answer the same question? Lol

@@nicoleallen2058 If Ben can’t defend himself, that’s on him. It’s not the interviewer’s job to make the pundit look good, and Ben discovered that the hard way. It doesn’t help he’s as far right as a right triangle appearing on the BBC

​@@nicoleallen2058If he was as smart and emotionally intelligent as he perpetrates to be, then he wouldn't have throed a tantrum like that. And, he does the same exact thing with college students to create a farce that he win debates😂

See how the zionists run from critique 😂

@@mordfustang3794 This was definitely Ben's worst interview. That said, he definitely didn't throw a tantrum. 😂

The interviewer has only asked questions in bad faith lol

@@FUnzzies1Weird stance to take when bad faith is kinda conservatives' entire thing, guy.

@@FUnzzies1 if the interviewer doesn't challenge the guests views and comments then what's the point of the interview?

^ Wait, are you telling me Fox News journalists aren't doing their jobs right? Color me surprised.

​@FUnzzies1 he simply exposed the hypocrisy of Ben shapiro 😂

So true

Except it's not even a debate! He somehow lost an interview!

@@joshuahuggins3359 fr lmao

​@joshuahuggins3359 Because to Ben everything is and intelexual Boxing match so he went in ready to fight and made a fool out of himself lolol

Nah I'll give him props he's usually a pretty good debater, but this wasn't even a debate...

Well his bubble hardly contains anyone who has the mental capabilities beyond a high schooler.

Questions, questions, questions! Shapiro is there to answer questions, not the other way around. Ben Shapiro got it wrong big time. What makes me think that he is the kind of guy who would upset a chessboard rather than concede impending defeat...

Too much exposure to college freshmen

Rat-tat-tat blarney sans the gift of the gab, I'd say...@@ciarangallagher9330

Ben Shapiro is a loser.

See how the zionists run from critique 😂

he also tilts his head forward like a bull, don't forget that

Never seen "Frost Vs. Nixon"? Although, this was even MORE SATISFYING, especially the bit where Daft Wee Benjamin Aaron "the JINO (if its' views on abortion are any guide) rage-quit because it was getting its' ARSE HANDED TO IT, on the WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL, by the MOST RIGHT-WING JOURNALIST CURRENTLY WORKING IN THE MAINSTREAM BRITISH MEDIA TODAY...

@M. Smith He did. He gave questions challenging Shapiro and his beliefs, that's what journalists are supposed to do. This was a news interview, not a daytime talk show interview. It's not Neil's fault that Shapiro didn't just answer the question, and instead decided to attack the question and the questioner. Really, that shows how Shapiro isn't really all that good at debating too, he can't focus on the topic, and instead seeks to discredit the opponent and invalidate the question rather than address it with real facts or logic.

@M. Smith Otvali, tovarisch - all Andrew did was, y'know, ask it to explain and justify some of the things it has said in the past, and COULD it? No, it COULDN'T - in fact, it, essentially, called a man who once said that, as HIV wasn't really a problem for straight men, it wasn't really a problem AT ALL and who USED TO WORK FOR RUPERT MURDOCH a LEFTIST. Are you REALLY this stupid, or are you just pretending? Just asking...

@M. Smith Fuck off, cretin - many thanks!

@M. Smith Also, most people who aren't Muscovite trolls tend to have at least SOME content on their KZfaq pages - nice try, tovarisch, but that was a bit of a schoolboy error...

lol

Ben rekt himself so hard by saying this.

You mean republican, not the same as coservative

Samuel Díez Shapiro is a so called nazi; that doesn’t mean his values actually lineup with hitler’s now does it?

Samuel Díez well, plenty of people have called Shapiro a nazi, so that makes him a so called nazi. Just because the dude doesn’t agree with the far left about socialism, that doesn’t make him conservative. Do you consider either of the Bush presidents to be conservative? Because they were most definitely not. How about Nixon? Their labels don’t line up with the ideology of conservatism. Conservative doesn’t get to change from person to person; it’s about individual rights, so it doesn’t matter what label someone uses when their ideology doesn’t fit the definition

quit*

zionists running away from critique 😂

@@encycl07pedia ☝️🤓

yeah like why tf you speaking so fast lil bro

See how the zionists run from critique 😂

Look like one too.

Lol

im crying is that true

stella Andrew Neil has been a hardcore conservative since he was like 5 years old. He was a proponent of every possible war that was ever on the agenda Iraq, Afghanistan etc, called Bush and Blair’s plan masterful, he denies climate change, he’s on the right when it comes to any issue you could possibly think of. I really don’t know what’s to the right of Andrew Neil. That’s what makes this hilarious.

fizwizzle1989 crying “fake news” has become the default fallback position of the US political right. Wonder where they learned that.

@@dkupke which has become more common? For the right to say "fake news" or for the left to say "racist"

@@SD_yessir fake news

That hit a funny bone I didn't know I had

@@rushikesh2320 lol

He did get his bussy wrecked in this video though

@Abby's Stuff happy holidays

Ben Shapiro left GAPED and BUTTHURT by BBC is more like it.

"Facts" according to leftists aren't facts

Omg he did.

That was not political discourse, that was a slew of leading questions and quotes taken out of context. I have serious doubts about your intellectual capacity if you think Shapiro “lost”

@@jlondono7 even shapiro said he lost. lmao, nice try.

@@microwavecoffee no, you tool.

@@jlondono7 I think the thing is that, there is no one lost. The purpose of the interview is just one person asking questions and the other answers, so that people can know more about the topic, which can a person, a book, or an opinion. This is the purpose of the whole thing. There is no back and forth interaction, it's supposed to be only one way. The only thing Ben "lost" to was not the debate, he didn't lose to the debate or argument, cuz there was none. But he lost calm and lost the interview. Tbh, the one being attacked here is not Ben, it was the BBC interviewer the whole time. About questions taken out of context, these are perfect opportunity for interviewees to fill in the context and extend that context to resonate with audience. Elsewhere on the internet, people will literally encounter and read these quotes out of context in everyday life (because they are too lazy to do more research), and Ben would have no chance to explain it. But here Ben was given this very channel to show it. But first he had to take it as a debate, and then had to take it personally. If your opinions can't be confronted by an interview that you lose temper to, idk how i feel about that. Edit adds: In summary, he is not good at this interview thing and he lost calm.

@I am a STUD why?

@I am a STUD Well lots of reasons, mainly that I still have a lot to live for, but what about that comment made you want to shoot yourself? Or were you saying that the solution to not being able to pick a speed is to just shoot yourself?

@I am a STUD Ok then lol, I guess that's technically true

I am a STUD You shot yourself in the head and are still alive *_and_* typing? Wow, impressive! 👌🏾

Shapiro needs to lay off the helium.

That last zinger was perfect.

See how the zionists run from critique 😂

😂😂😂

zionists running away from critique 😂

He was provided a hypothetical and had a complete meltdown, then got mad because he wasn't allowed to monologue off his pre written talking points. The fact that he folded like a house of cards to a hypothetical is pretty indicative of his entire style of derailing any sort of reasonable discourse in a discussion. Turns out when he's an interviewee and can't deflect with rapid-fire questions of his own, his last resort is to storm out like a toddler. Kind of like Trump in the 60 minutes interview.

@@voigto I think its even worse than that - he was totally free to go off on his talking points as long as he kept it relevant to the question at hand

That's how interviews work in US of A

this was not an interview, It was an interrogation

​@@airinhewram8478 asking regular questions instead of softball questions doesn't make the interview an interrogation. Literally everything he asked was a valid and reasonable question. If Shapiro had managed to stick to his own doctrine of facts and logic, instead of making it an emotional personal battle it would have been a great interview.

lmfao. Ben will do anything to win a debate, even lie in your face. The guy is a hack.

Right. He looks like a drone prepared to spout instructions. I have never been this guy looking like he hadn't a stick shoved up his ass

"Youasanalarmclockandtheconcepofdistubingmyevolutionaryneededslumberisamodernconstruct,Iatthismoment,refusetoacknowledgerightnowinthisverymoment.We'lltalkaboutthisatalatertime.Nono.IfyouletmefinishI'minclinedtohighlightthatyoustartedthisconversation". *Hits snooze button for 5 more minutes.

☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@detnemt9571 lies like what

You're exaggerating _a little_ bit. We're all having a bad day, we're all human no? If you ditched him after that, you weren't quite interested to begin with I'll suppose. No doubt. It is often more interesting to listen Peterson's politics takes personally. But after all, this is all worldly politics. Mari Emmanuel is a real servant | and life is not about politics, which is fleeting and will always be: distraction.

The fact you can admit change in your own views after making a mistake shows great growth. Whether you're conservative, liberal, or anything in between, I hope you continue to form your own opinions on the topics that matter most, and continue to see the charlatans for who they are.

zionists running away from critique 😂

​@@EncourageLegacyor maybe you could stop speaking for the guy you replied to and reflect on yourself for trying to change his truth just because you're too offended by what he said.

@@RedceLL1978 how am I offended? Or maybe you could stop projecting emotions unto my genuine comment without giving any reference, still less knowing, seeing me. A wording where I went astray, can you be more precise? I am not trying to change “his Truth“ ('nice postmodernism by the way'), it is simply immature to shame the guy for a bad interview, and cancel his other great efforts. Modern times. Well... Are you not doing the same? If that is how someone personally approaches matters, may feel free to do so. This is not how the world holds together. I am not the judge. Still having an opinion apparently is the same as being offended, if that is not shallow I don't know what is. God bless you! 🕯

Ben "Destroyer" Shapiro finally knows what the woke college students he publicly "DESTROYED" felt LOL

When you are very short, you yell a lot.

🤣

That's just it tho, the interviewer got to the heart of the issue and exposed Ben as the angry little boy he is. You can see the embarrassment on his face at the end there as he realizes he has lost control of his emotions.

If I were Ben, I'd have done the same thing!! The interviewer wasn't just asking pertinent questions, he was making snide insinuations, as Brits love to do!! 😮

And then whines when Niel tells him the same thing..

Boxer529 lol

Yeah, to a man working for the WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL - absolutely priceless, wasn't it?

@@Dundoril Actually Neill at the end around 15:00 says " .... And I did not know you before I _briefed_ myself on this ...." which was an elegant underhanded kick. Because Shapiro could have found out in 1 minute online search (wikipedia): Interviewer is staunch conservative. And with a little more research: Neil has grilled a lot of high profile politicians and some of them are skilled weasels too. I think Bo-Jo did not dare to be interviewed in the last election. In other words: Ben Grifter is so sure that his rhetoric tricks get him out of a tight spot in interviews that he did not bother to prepare. And he is used to softball questions to begin with. this is the _BBC_ and he wants to sell his book. A good interview could have helped him doing that. It was legitimate to look at his former positions. Unlike U.S. media you do not get a book promotion and free airtime (does he know what ads would cost at that spot ? With the BBC and one of their high profile interviewers). He will have to endure that it goes beyond polite questions about his book and the very recent past. And since a lot of the UK audience may not know him he should greet the opportunity to elaborate. If they google him they will come across his criticized statements anyway. If it is part of his ideology stand by it even if it is unpopular. If not admit it. (I should not have said that about all Palestinians, I applies to Hamaz, and I aploogize. I have evolved on that, the tweets are in 2012. Well he is paid to not evolve on that issue, that is why he got angry). He is a professional bullshitter, and Breitbart and the big donors behind them - pay him - and not for ideologcially consistent positions. that is why he got so defensive. 6 weeks heartbeat abortion ban. If you stand behind that and allegedly like a somewhat controversial spirited debate (free speech, no PC crap) - you do not play offended if that is called dark ages. You say: I disagree strongly and here is why 1) ... 2) ... 3) .... He didn't do that. He tried to deflect by attacking.

@@xyzsame4081 ". Because Shapiro could have found out in 1 minute online search (wikipedia" To be fair...In general there is no reason to brief yourself about the interviewer...The person interviewee is imporant after all... Unless you want to make sure that you do not make an ass of youself by "analysing the questions and being sure that the interviewer is left wing"... " Ben Grifter is so sure that his rhetoric tricks get him out of a tight spot in interviews that he did not bother to prepare. " Shapiro in a nutshell...

Yeah this one is for the history books.

Absolutely - and "he" got OBLITERATED by an old, Scottish Tory, which makes it even more fantastic, doesn't it?

@Adrian Heath I have actually already seen a few of these window-licking morons attempting to defend Daft Benny's, piss-poor, performance. And it's absolutely HILARIOUS to watch, wasn't it?

@@richardsmart5532 cheerio!

@@nationalstudyacademykim5030 Adios, amiga, adios...

@Adrian Heath It certainly was, wasn't it?

Ben was saying anger Is too much in American discourse. Der.

@@rajay777 by getting angry..?

@@jollyswagman4714 Being flustered is not the same as being angry. Ben was upset that this was not a real interview. "When you were a child you ate a cookie and claimed you did not eat the cookie. Are you a dirty no good stupid idiotic down right evil liar?!"

@@_-___________ he looked pretty angry to me

​@@jollyswagman4714 How would you feel if I insulted you for no reason? Would you feel indifference? How about there any degree of confusion? If I were to push my unfounded statement (unfounded to me) would you be mad at me for talking where I have no grounds talking? If I were to attack your character when you expected a polite interview, would you be understandably upset? If no, then I guess you have been hurt some time in the past and are cynical.... or there is something wrong with you.

zionists running away from critique 😂

The interviewer is objective.. Liking your own posts is a bit sad

Because he has NEVER had to explain his own stances

@@davedmusic3598 Why do you defend Shapiro on a debate he has with himself?

Exactly

All the interviewer did was repeat his own beliefs at him and he got angry and stormed out, he obviously has never questioned his own beliefs

I come back to this interview every couple of months because I find it so funny. “Mr. Shapiro if only you knew how ridiculous you sound then you would have never said it”

What a beautiful finale…!! Lmao Putting this in my playlist

Just like Matt Gaetz' dates...

Still making the same bone head arguments, but he's lucky his party is so dumb, attracted to the Jessie Waters/ Tucker personalities, content is irrelevant

​@@WJHDetroityou thought he sounded ridiculous for saying his words back to him? You are part of the problem.

Well in a debate sometimes both sides get to ask questions.. just sometimes

Rafi Stefansky This wasn’t a debate, it was an interview, despite how much Ben Shapiro tried to turn it into a debate.

@@RosieAnims And it was utterly GLORIOUS to watch, wasn't it?

Richard Smart Sure was

@Douglas Oh fuck OFF, you window-licking waste-of-an-ovum - just because your shero got her ASS HANDED TO HER,, REPEATEDLY, ON THE WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL, why not CRY-ME-A-FUCKING-RIVER, snowflake, and try to not leave TOO big a puddle when you eventually melt. Adios, cretin - missing you already! Like I'd miss, say, tertiary Syphilis.

A small boy

snidelywhiplash ya like a fuckin GOOBER

MrStaano ?

Lol

Ben made that "journalist" look like a columnist for the National Enquirer.

Nailed it! We can always learn from the old...knowledge and wisdom never gets old!

Notwithstanding BBC's clear Passive Aggressive provocation. What a sham. There seems to be little unbiased interviewers anymore

​@@EclecticEcentric How Dare You Say That Dont Be So Raven Transphobic 🤬😡😠

@@cadejust6777 - Passive Aggressive much? Hitler also used to scream with great fervor and somehow manipulated the masses. Clearly you have a general hate for people as you automatically identify me (without meeting me, or speaking with me, etc) as transphobic (or any other phobic for that matter) Clearly another shill / troll. To rebut - I dare to say what I will, because - guess what - freedom of speech/expression. And my comment has no "phobic" undertones at all. Clearly, because I did not jump on the BBC bandwagon - you make great assumptions - one of the signposts of troubled thinking. I hope you get help. Please stop spreading your misguided hate and false words. Try to live well ... and if possible - in peace with the world... but with yourself first.

Cooked Shapiro’s entire “career” in one sentence

*"I'm a journalist that will ask (politically motivated) questions (in order to subconsciously project my views on the low IQ individuals that watch BBC)." Fixed it for yuh bub

@@TheSemiRealSlimShady trippy

@@TheSemiRealSlimShady Ahh, Ben and Trump claim another low wattage bulb.

That means he's leftist

@@TheSemiRealSlimShady Lol Andrew Neil is a known UK Conservative, get your facts straight idiot

agreed

Ben certainly didn't take down that hole. The guy reading his cue cards did - and on purpose. He is the poster child of how bad tv personalities, ie, fake journalist have become. It was meant as real attack and he knows it.

@@bestofthewes1446 American interviews are very different from British ones. In Britain the interviewer asks questions and the interviewee is meant to be the only one answering, whereas in America there is more of a debate format in an interview. Andrew briefed himself for the interview. Ben clearly did not, not only did he not know Andrew was conservative, he also didn’t know the format of British interviews which he ought to have known before jumping into this interview.

@@bestofthewes1446 Because it's an interview and not a debate. An interviewer should stay impartial thrugh at the interview and by all accounts Neil did exactly that.

@@yokloj1503 it’s not the 1700’s, the world no longer cares what Britain thinks 😂

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

zionists running away from critique 😂

The best part is seeing boiben - struggling to unmic in the face of someone who isn't going to be derailed by his still-waiting-for-his-balls-to-drop-talk-so-fast-no-one-can-say-anything-whataboutism-bullshit- realise at some fundamental level that he *CAN'T* get the last word because he already said "We're not playing anymore because it's my ball and I'm going home!" *impotent footstamp*

Don't get me wrong, I thoroughly enjoyed this entire interview but that last line is undoubtedly the best part

If you ever visit england or meet someone from there, it is part of their language and norms to actually have a private inner life, which means all snark and mic drops must be delivered with veiled charm instead of outright attacks

@Minwon Jang Dude..I totally agree. I don't believe American presidents can endure that weekly in-person abuse.

Yes - he outsmarted Shapiro. Shapiro fell into the hole he did for himself.

The face Shapiro made when he heard that! He was disappointed in himself for a second.

Huge burn!

Maia Waive, wow you liberals are mental. You obviously didn’t listen to a thing Ben said. He’s not talking about that kind of anger. Like he said he enjoys a heated debate which things are chatted about. He was referring to how people are practically evil such as Neil who is twisting Ben’s words and shouldn’t even be the one interviewing him.

Hamsterking101 it speaks to Your own ignorance to assume that I’m Liberal, no wonder you side with Ben in this video. I happen to agree with Ben’s perspective in many issues including His Pro Life stance but EVEN BEN HIMSELF ADMITTED that he did not conduct his due diligence in this matter. Unfortunately, a highly polarising approach in journalism has become a hallmark of US reporting and that is simply untrue in many other news outlets across the globe. When this notoriously right wing conservative reporter is inquiring an OPPOSING VIEW to Ben’s narrative, he allows Ben to showcase his beliefs as juxtaposed against contradiction, which is excellent journalism. Instead of calmly explaining his views and addressing reasonable opposition he chose to be emotional and take the questions as a personal attack. Isn’t Ben the one who said that “facts don’t care about your feelings” and yet he treated an interview as a debate.

Hamsterking101 Also, it speaks to Andrew Neil’s maturity and professionalism that he is able to remove his own beliefs in the equation and instead ask questions that challenge the guest’s beliefs regardless of what those are. Honestly, your Fox News, MSNBC, CNN etc. Should take notes!

Poor little Child 😅

Epic burn!

What did he mean by this?

@@AntonioLopez-bc6qg It's a sarcastic/British way of pointing out that anger is very much a part of American political discourse. I.E. Ben Shapiro embarrassed himself by losing his cool during a perfectly reasonable interview. (By British standards at least)..

@@mrgennaro232 its the irony that Ben is way to sensitive. and his slogan does not make sense.

It means that Ben Shapiro's credibility is questionable. He can't accept criticism. He rataliates with insults if trapped with a question which he can't answer sensibly eventually making him irrelevant in mainstream American political discourse.

Casey M lmao 😂

Casey M BEN GETTING MADE FUN OF FOR TELLING THE TRUTH. I GUESS ITS NOW ILLEGAL TO SAY FACTS. HUH...SOUNDS LIKE A LIBERAL POLICY. LIBERAL BBC REPORTER GOT DESTROYED.

shut up brilliant move you niga

@@okcope6749 ur a weird, weird person

@@meredithleavitt5815 he's an angry American boy who has a crush on Ben Shapiro.

Never argue with a Scotsman!!!!!

@Rob universal healthcare is not seen as a left wing position anywhere outside the US. Even the most right wing parties still think everyone should get healthcare, there is no left-right divide. Only in the US is universal healthcare considered at all radical.

Wennie Wowney mate universal healthcare is a socialist policy

@@bruhlookatthisdude1499 *in the USA Everywhere else in the world it is standard practice

@Sam Jones Yea it is a socialist policy. Just like having a police force, firefighters and a military. Those are all things which are publicly owned just like the UK NHS.

Wennie Wowney t is standard practise, but it is still a socialist idea.

I can just hear him thinking: "Wait. What does that mean? Is there something I should know here? Ack. Maybe I should have done some research on this guy before I accepted to do the interview." Bwahaha.

👏👏👏😂@@riczen6652

brilliant

@@riczen6652 exactly searching for people before interviewing with them is so cowardly movement 😂😂

I came here after listening to Ben the devil justifying the atrocities commited by the criminal government of isreal Despicable individual!

Old is gold

The look on Andrew's face when he said that had me in tears haha

@@olivergolding8927 Strangely enough, the entire interview almost had Benjamin Aaron Shitpiro in tears - on the WORLD'S BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL...

I guess once you're far enough to the right evryone is "left" lol

American Politics is like "you're either with us or against us." Andrew Neil's description of American media in comparison to the media in the UK seems to support that.

@@miketerele1584 Absolutely, although none of the right-wing "news" channels are allowed to market themselves as "News" organisations -ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC and CNN all are, but Fux Noise, Breitbart and OANN? Nope. Just saying...

It certainly was...

Conor Murphy 🤣

licence

Conor Murphy imagine living in a country that makes you buy a television license

"quick buck on the BBC" really got me

zionist running away from critique 😂

Ben is a smart person, so this doesn’t apply.

@@alsid3 it can when andrew is the stupid person :)

Daylyt Hahahahahahahaha good one mate 😂😂

Daylyt You seem to have misspelled "Ben is a blithering idiot."

Sebastian Gonzalez The fact that you’re deriving my intelligence off of this one comment of mine makes your comment arrogant and flat out witless.

bill p THESE QUESTIONS WERE UNFAIR TO BEN LIBERAL MEDIA TRYING TO PAINT IT LIKE HE LOST. LIBERAL BBC REPORTER GOT DESTROYED.

@@exakdev2631 i would say r/wooosh but this seems like a trap

The reporter wasn't a liberal, as a Ben Shapiro fan I feel that he could have handled the situation differently. As the interviewer stated that he was unbiased, he was asking such "leftie" questions because he's conservative.

@@okcope6749 You don't know Andrew Neill at all do you...

@@garymorgan3314 I think he doesn't know much at all to be very honest.

The media isn't controlled by the left

Intentionally being disingenuous. That's all he's good at doing.

He just doesn't want to take responsibility for what he said in the past . Big sign of immaturity

​@@myusernameisnotuniqueeverybody in this comment section thinks they are experts 😅

@@idisplaypace2411 Only the Zionists

​@idisplaypace2411 - so you think being able to listen and watch an interview and then think about it, and expressing what you think about it somehow requires you to be an expert? Why on earth would you think that? Where have you got such a stupid idea? And merely positing an opposing point of view to illicit the interviewee's full position on a matter doesn't make the questioner a member of that opposing point of view's political camp. You've seen too many chat shows masquerading as interviews. There's a real difference.

"Now I'll ask again. What size would you like your meal?" "Sir, I'd be happy to answer your question as long as you answer mine. Is Wendy's a politically impartial establishment?"

@@blackknightjack3850 Or are you a "SOCIALIST"?

I agree, The BBC has the mental capacity of a Wendy's employee.

@@richardpierpoint7515 "Sure. I wouldn't mind 15$ an hour to make ends meet" . "IF YOU HATE CAPITALISM SO MUCH THEN WHY DON'T YOU MOVE TO VUVUZELA?"

@@blackknightjack3850 Absolutely - it's a real shame that all of these Rethuglicans have never travelled as far as, say, the United Kingdom or even Canada...

And that's a fact...

Iron clad argument

Not to mention that Andrew Neil is so right-wing that he once suggested that, as HTLV-3/HIV WASN'T, REALLY, A PROBLEM FOR STRAIGHT MEN, IT WASN'T REALLY A PROBLEM AT ALL. Just reminding everyone...

"How do you feel about the abortion laws proposed in Georgia?" "How are the abortion laws proposed in Georgia NOT barbaric and taking us back to the dark ages?" one is a question that ben can respond to and one is picking a side.

Tyler Seel im pretty sure in bens book he wrote something about how abortion was barbaric and taking us back to the dark ages. The phrasing of the question comes from bens phrasing in the book

@@xXMaJ3StYXx Ben can respond to either just fine.

Apparently Trump’s a big fan of him

You mean the interviewer? Yeah he was a jackass

@@jlondono7 Simp harder for Trump daddy

@@jlondono7 found the tier 3 Trump sub.

@Amelia X holy shit amelia

Dude was trying to throw Shapiro a rope, help him out of the hole he dug but shapiro kept wrapping it around his own neck.

Ironically anti-sjws are the biggest snowflakes.

14:23 is the time stamp but you have to look at the context

that's out of context. But I guess that's what you expect right? He was referring to the point that they just wanted him on the show to ask gotcha questions because he is famous and were not actually interested in civil discourse or philosophy discussions.

@@jakemetcalf2049 Ah, the classic "Buh.. but they took it out of context!!11!1!1" excuse.

@@brazu9864 Because that's all these idiots are capable of doing. Screw being objective journalists. You people are disgusting.

andrew neil was thatchers pr goon wasn't he ?

Time for the Centricide

I specifically listen to the bbc because they inject less emotion and opinion into their reporting unless it’s specifically framed as opinion.

@@inflorire I don't know about that - have you seen the recent Axios interview with Das Orange Anus? If you haven't, it is utterly brilliant and well wort watching...

The "you're either with us or against us" mentality is deeply rooted into American culture. Left vs right, north vs south, republican vs democrat, capitalism vs communism, why can't they just find a middle ground?

“I’m a journalist that asks questions”💀

You clearly do not have a clear basis to how an argument is structured: Andrew consistently attempted to make cornering point to jab at Shapiro, to which Shapiro answered. However in a part i didn't even have to search for I clicked randomly, I found at 5:30 where Ben answered then he failed to reflect his own view. This happened repeatedly with jabs and attempts at corning that failed and Ben had none of it. This was the mature decision; I neither would sit in an 'interview' meant to pin me that can't even do it properly. Have a good day

Stolze Herren He didn’t answer the questions he just got mad and accused Andrew of being left. Then he threw a fit and left lmao

Angel Scott the only thing the interviewer talked about was tweets from Ben Shapiro that happened years ago😂 a pretty shitty interviewer tbh😂😂😂😂

Stolze Herren Ben Shapiro attempts to “trap” the college students he debates with all the time as well.

MasterGenius he does more than debate ya know. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

Anakin skywalker mf’s be like:

Shapiro is so obsessed with the culture wars all he sees is bias against him. Hes so used to being in an echo chamber he can't fathom the idea of being asked a question from the opposite perspective.

@@banquetmeal663 ben shapiro is the debate equivalent of those teenage hacking groups that take down gaming platforms on christmas, in that they clearly have a maddening amount of talent and potential yet waste it on being just petty and shitty

@@mattdekonty7012 That was not a debate. That old man had no good will with Ben.

@@leonardobji You're correct, this was an interview, conducted by the most right-wing journalist working in the mainstream British media today - I don't know how things work in Russia but, here in the United Kingdom, our journalists challenge their interviewees to discover whether their ideas actually hold any water or if, like Silly Wittle Benjamin Aaron Sh1tpiro, they re so full of crap it's completely unsurprising that they have brown eyes. Now, cry-me-a-river, snowflake and try to not leave TOO big puddle when you eventually melt - blgodaryu vas, kretin...

It highlights either one of two things, both equally concerning: 1. Ben Shapiro, the leading figure and voice in recent conservatism, UCLA PolySci and Harvard Law graduate is that politically illiterate and dumb that he considers Andrew Neil a leftist. 2. American politics and the overton window is SO far to the right that someone like Andrew Neil is considered a leftist.

@@bothi00 it's more number 2 honestly

@@bothi00 Differen't politics culture simple as that and Andrew always goes hard against whomever he interviews.

@@dnw009 then that means Ben is just really dumb and doesn't comprehend or understand different politics culture. Even separate from that, assumes a person's political stance just because they scrutinise your position

@@nicklaine5203 its definitely #1 lol

To be honest, I've never seen Andrew Neil fail an interview Left or Right. Ben Shapiro spat the dummy. I agree with him on very little (especially free speech) but Neil caught him imo.

Neil is right of center in the UK, because the UK is much more left politically than the US. Which, follow me now, would make him left of center in the US. As seen by his blatant politically leanings (to the left) in his questions.

But Sean, Neil was challenging Shapiro because it's his job to do so. If he's being challenged, he should defend his position without making childish assertions about the interviewer's political bias.

@@swanson671 Even if Neil agrees with shapiro it is his job to challenge it as it gives a fair argument, he asks questions and gives counters to there response but doesnt usually give his opinion or make statements

To call neil anything but the left is ridiculous.

@Angry it's a gift Andrew Neil who now works for the right wing spectator ?

@@mikeburke3576 exactly, the window of acceptable political discussion in the US has shifted so far to the right that anyone left of Reagan is considered "Radical left".

@@mikeburke3576 exactly, the window of acceptable political discussion in the US has shifted so far to the right that anyone left of Reagan is considered "Radical left".

@Angry it's a gift I"m assuming ypu don't know who Andrew Neil is.

So, let me break down the word assume as it was done in Nursing school. This is what happens when you assume: ASS - U - ME You make an ass of yourself and the person you assume against.

'Facts don't care about your feelings' whilst his core political and social beliefs are based off his religious beliefs...

@@tagus100 Actually, they are based off SOMEONE ELSE'S RELIGIOUS BELIEFS because, in Judaism, a FOETUS ISN'T EVEN CONSIDERED A PERSON UNTIL IT HAS BEEN DELIVERED. Just saying...

@@richardpierpoint7515 Thank you for proving my point.

@@tagus100 Sorry, Chlamydiamist3r, but what-the-fuck WAS your point? That you are a Jewish-Nazi ballswasher? You're extremely welcome!

@@richardpierpoint7515 No, that Ben is a hypocrite and doesn't abide by his mantra. Your first comment illustrated that.

But in this universe the child can end the uncomfortable lesson before it’s sunk in.

@@washburj I agree on that lol .

It wasn’t even an argument. Ben lost to himself

Classic anglo shade on the US

@@jibrankhantareen7300 Absolutely - although Andrew Neil is, actually, Scottish...

There is a moment you can pause the video right after Neil says that, where he is looking straight into the camera and Shapiro is bowing his head in defeat and shame. Makes for a great screenshot.

lol, the look on his face was like, dang, I screwed that up for sure

@@jud6ment And it was only on, y'know, the World's BIGGEST NEWS CHANNEL, so it's not like tens-of-millions of people will have seen it is it? Oh, hang on...

@Bradley Tuttle may be that opinion is formed based on her own personal experience of coming across a lot of American people who do that throughout her life

@Bradley Tuttle when I was in America most people used sir and ma'am whereas here in Canada I hear people use Mr. or Miss. could be wrong but those are just my personal experiences

It's a form of respect. So is ma'am. Learn professional courtesy lol.

@@justusforrster9264 😂😂called common courtesy.. does not become professional until you get to the military, folk have been corrected after calling sergeants “sir”.

Drill sergeants*

Its seems British conservitaves are very different than American conservatives.

Stolen comment..shame on you.

@@vincebernau127 doctored more so

@@blakee121 you are right. You stole it and changed 3 words, my bad :D

@@vincebernau127 you are forgiven

My favorite moment

destroyed his ego in one simple sentence.

Ben: "Then why the hell are you interviewing me, sir?" Maybe that's why he's surprised

@@reils5436 Why the hell did he accept an interview from the best-known interviewer in the UK without doing his research on him? Anybody who has seen any Andrew Neil interview knows that he plays devil's advocate, knows that he is not a liberal (although, the US Democrat party is to the right of the British Conservative party, so perhaps that's where Benny-Boy got that impression), and knows that he will press the question until it is answered.

Andrew: "Then why the hell did you accept this interview?!" Stupid game for that lad to play, Neil is a 70 year-old professional political journalist with a healthy income, he won't give the slightest toss about how many hits Shapiro's website gets or how many viewers he has.

yes it ooo

*have

@@karlhungus888 thanks 🙏

That gives him far too much credit.

Keep in mind that conservatism is relative to the country you're living in.

Yes. Andrew did take a beating. He was sweating badly after Mr Shapiro danced around the ring and got the old man on the ropes. Ben stopped the contest by politely leaving before Andrew got too badly hurt. We all have our off days. Andrew probably had jet-lag.

@@martynhunter3542 andrew won, ben raged quit.

@@martynhunter3542 third cope comment

@@PodcastCentral333 You're so kind. I appreciate you taking the time to compliment me on my writing, but there's really no need. Thanks anyway. Cheers.

@@a357 Yes, that's right. Ben won quite easily in the end. And he's someone who never gets angry or gets into a rage. He was brilliant, as usual.