Thanks for watching! Don’t forget to subscribe! What lenses do you use for landscape photography? 🤔 😃
@acecreates3 жыл бұрын
I use that lens wots on my iphone 3
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
@@acecreates 😂
@ThomasRaskPhoto3 жыл бұрын
Nice video Rauri! :) I only use two lenses for landscape photography. A 24-70 and a 70- 200 (with a 1.4 TC that gives me 98-280mm). I do want a ultra wide lens, like a 15mm or something. But I cant afford one right now. Good job on the video. You are super pro at talking. :)
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
@@ThomasRaskPhoto Thanks so much Thomas. Your current lenses with the TC already makes for a great kit! I reckon as you said a wide angle prime would be great if you see yourself shooting wide a lot, I haven't done much wide angle recently which I regret. Thanks again for the support mate.
@ikeentelechytv14 күн бұрын
What I'm making use of is 28 by 70 lens I don't really enjoy the work
@AdrianRankin3 жыл бұрын
Nice collection Rauri! I really need to use my 16-35 f2.8 way more than I do but like you say depends on what your shooting. It does do a great job on Astro on the couple of occasions I’ve been out. Great video mate!
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Adrian! Yeah the 16-35 2.8 is a a great lens, can’t go wrong! I do want to use it more as I’ve been stuck with the 100-400 recently 😂 thanks for watching mate
@johnbentley10563 жыл бұрын
Great video and super informative. In the past few years I have moved away from the heavier full frame outfits and into the realm of micro four thirds. I often use a one camera, one lens approach. This is often just a single prime lens but is on occasion swapped out for my 14-150mm zoom. This is the equivalent of a 28-300mm full frame lens. I find the much lighter M43 system is kinder on my back which isn't what it used to be. 😃😃
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for watching John! The 14-150mm seems like a great focal range too! The weight of your system is a massive pro! That’s the reason I ended up getting Fuji for my video camera… as another full frame Sony would be way too heavy. Thanks again for the support mate 😊
@adrianalfordphotography3 жыл бұрын
Some good choices in there Rauri. I think I’d love to try out that 12-24mm GM, expensive I know, but it looks pretty impressive. Budget wise the Tamron trinity is definitely worth a look. You’ve proven your Sigma 100-400mm is worth every cent you paid for it. Thanks for sharing the look around the Soniverse of lens options mate 👍🙏
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for being an early watcher Adrian! I really wanna try the 12-24mm too (apart from in camera stores 😂).. such a great lens! Appreciate the kind words and support on this genre of video mate.
@huwalban3 жыл бұрын
Thank for this one Rauri. As a potential future customer of Sony (remember the A7rIV is on my hit list) this has proven to be a most useful video. I hadn't considered going with a 28-200 as a first lens option. I'd gotten fixated with a 28-70, but if I can dip a toe into the "Sony" water with something a little cheaper then that is going to be a significant bonus. On a personal note, thank you very much for your support on my own channel. I always look out for your comments, and am very grateful for the interest. Hope that you are keeping well and safe sir.
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching Huw - as I'm aware gear videos are not what a portion of my subscribers want to see, so I appreciate your support on this! 👍🏻 There are a lot of options for lenses in the sony world, I didn't touch on Primes as this could go on for days, and Sigma have more lenses which I could have mentioned but didn't. The Tamron 28-200 is a great option if you want to start with one lightweight lens at a great price. You're very welcome, I truly enjoy your videos and discussions as I often end up learning something new or a new way of thinking about photography or gear etc. Thanks again 😁
@huwalban3 жыл бұрын
@@RauriBarron I've checked prices for the Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 this morning, and they are retailing around the £650 UK pounds mark. By comparison the FE24-105 f/4 G OSS (which was going to be my starter lens) is around the £800 level. Not much but every £ counts when just dipping a toe in. Thanks again, and stay safe.
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thanks mate. Interesting comparison! Both lenses are great, but I think for the money the Tamron is worth it 😊. I heard Tamron will make lenses for Fuji now too which I’m excited about. Hopefully will transfer their great autofocus abilities on the Sony to Fuji at a good price
@PhotoTrekr5 ай бұрын
I carried a 16-35mm GM lens for years. But, I rarely used it. In fact, I rarely shoot wider than 24mm. If I want to go wider, I use the 20mm G lens. In the past I've used the 14mm GM which is excellent. So, basically I use two lenses. The 24-70mm GM II and the 70-200mm GM II. Those two lenses cover 90% of what I shoot. I will use the 1.4x with the 70-200 when I travel or the 200-600mm G when I'm home. I just ordered the Sigma 500mm DG DN Sport. But, it will be more for wildlife than landscapes.
@WalksOnTheWildSide3 жыл бұрын
Great recommendations and a really good summary of the range of lenses. I have both the Tamron 17-28mm and 28-75mm. The 28-75, in particular, is excellent for its price. It’s sharp, fast and the colour rendition is great. I’ve got the Sony 70-200mm too but hardly ever use it.
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot mate, I've heard so many good things about the 28-75, glad you have also enjoyed it. Thanks for watching!
@kshitijaya25093 жыл бұрын
Wonderful sharing .superb information .useful for many others .thanks for this important and interesting video .greetings :))
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot I’m glad you think so! Appreciate checking my video out 👍
@photographyadventuresbygraciel3 жыл бұрын
Great video and beautiful pictures! I am a Tamron user as well and I have nothing but good things to say about the brand!
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot 😊 I’ve heard so many good things about Tamron, in my opinion they beat some sigma lenses as they can be super heavy 😂 which isn’t great for mirrorless. Thanks for the support
@paulcookphotography3 жыл бұрын
Great vid Rauri. So many options out there! Personally, I use 16-35, 24-70, and 70-300, all Sony lenses. I also have the 85mm GM lens that I use for portraits. But I will never buy another Sony lens when there are choices from Tamron and Sigma that are nearly as good (if not as good) for a much better price. Very all inclusive video mate, well done for getting all of this put together! Hope all is well down there and you guys are keeping safe.
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching Paul! Truly appreciate it as I'm aware not everyone is into gear videos. That 85mm prime is lovely! I used to have the cheaper f1.8 which was great, but sold it as I wasn't using it enough...I don't do much portrait work. Couldn't agree more about the Tamron options, I think I may picking up a wide focal range at a good price, for those long hikes to reduce the bag's weight, as Nigel Danson has done with his Nikon 24-200 I think it is? Thanks again Paul! 😁
@peterviragphoto3 жыл бұрын
First comment😂 still watching🤪
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Haha you’re a legend! 😊
@peterviragphoto3 жыл бұрын
@@RauriBarron Great video mate, super informative and comprehensive in regards to all potential lenses that would suit the Sony FF system. Those G master lenses are amazing but you also shed some light on relatively underrated glass that performs close or in some instances even outperforms their much more expensive counterparts. Great stuff! Cheers😉📸📷
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot mate glad you agree on that point, the sigma and Tamron are really great for the price. I’ve considered picking up a Tamron for the long hikes due to the versatility and weight. Thanks again 😊
@davidligon6088 Жыл бұрын
I currently use Sony 16-35 GM, 24-105 G, and 100-400 GM. The 16-35 Sony-Zeiss f4 is great in the center, but just plain mushy on the sides and corners. I returned 3 copies, it was so bad. The 16-35 f4 PZ G is, however, a great choice. My current two lens, lightweight solution is the 16-35 GM and Tamron 28-200. I will be moving to the Sony 20-70 f4 G and 70-200 f4 Macro G pair, because they are so amazingly sharp!
@Robert-Bishop3 жыл бұрын
Some good recommendations here Rauri. The Sony lenses look really good quality. I'm still waiting to get my holy trinity of 2.8 lenses. The Nikon Z f/4 lenses are so good though, that I always find something else to buy before the 2.8s!
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot Rob, a trinity of 2.8 is a dream haha but the weight of it isn't. I'm happy with my f4 as well, it's perfect for what I need, and having the wide angle at 2.8 is perfect for my use at night too. Thanks for checking this out.
@chadmorrow27222 жыл бұрын
Thanks for that review! Got some good info out of it📸
@RauriBarron2 жыл бұрын
Cheers chad!
@colinstalker3 жыл бұрын
Great video and advice Rauri. I have used Tamron and Tokina lenses previously with some outstanding results. Now I have changed to Sony the 16-35 GM and 100-400GM are my two favorites. Lucky I have a very understanding wife 😂 😂 as the wallet is a lot lighter but the glass is awesome 👌
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Colin, sorry for my late reply! Have been knocked out sick 😂. Appreciate the support mate, one of the first lenses I had was tokina… pretty great glass. Haha respect to you wife 😊 the 100-400 GM is wonderful just a bit pricey for me at the time! Great kit there.
@krisographystudios3 жыл бұрын
Mate your vids are polished , really enjoyed it even though I'm not Sony 🤣
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Cheers mate, took a lot of effort although I’m not sure it shows 😂 thanks for watching…
@acecreates3 жыл бұрын
Yeah I totally just muted you and let the video run through - Sony shmony. But, LOVE the post production stuff you've done with this video. Next level mate!
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
😂 thanks a lot you legend. Appreciate your kind words on the video production.. as I spent hours ripping out what little hair I have left putting this together 😆. Cheers again mate! 🙏🏼
@acecreates3 жыл бұрын
@@RauriBarron it was worth it mate, the vid looks MINT
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
You made my WEEK thank you
@MeasuredLight3 жыл бұрын
Really good video Rauri! Good recommendations! When I use my Olympus kit I use a 12-40mm (24-80mm FF equivalent) and 40-150mm (80-300mm FF equivalent). Both F/2.8 lenses. And I have a 1.4x teleconverter for the telephoto. I have a bunch of other lenses for it, but those are all I usually bring along! With the Fuji I only have primes! 50mm, 80mm, 150mm and 250mm. The last three are adapted, and I don't use the 80mm often. But lucky it has a bunch of resolution if I need longer than 250mm!
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Such a good collection mate, the Olympus range from 24 to 300 f2.8 is awesome and I bet a lot lighter than my 3 Sony lenses 😂. Definitely keen to see more content with the new Fuji. 😊 thanks for checking this out.
@brianbeattyphotography3 жыл бұрын
Great ones Rauri. I too like the 16mm and 400mm ends, though I tend to be a bit more even than you! The 24-70 is probably my go to.
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot Brian 😃
@KieranSuddabyPhotography3 жыл бұрын
Lovely collection Rauri. Great honest discussion and love the different options you've given from budget to no expense spared. Really good video. I'm canon, but have 3 lenses covering 10mm-300mm, with a couple of little gaps. All rather slow lenses, but at around £350 for the lot with top quality optics, I won't complain about the slowness. The holy canon budget trinity 😂 great video mate.
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for checking this out mate despite being a canon shooter 😉 That’s awesome, 10-300 for £350 is a bargain. I’m considering getting the Tamron 28-200 as a lightweight but versatile lens for those long hikes, the price is worth it too! Thanks for watching 😊
@KieranSuddabyPhotography3 жыл бұрын
@@RauriBarron I'm taking a friend into getting one of them tamron super zooms because it will suit him perfectly, and I'm eager to see how it performs!
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Yeah that’s awesome. My dad has the 28-200 and the shots he makes from it are awesome!
@paulkennedycreativemedia3 жыл бұрын
So many lenses out. I really need to get lenses for my Sony. All I have for it is the kit lens. My Nikon has the good old 18-300 that I use for weddings and such things but it has been used for pretty much everything before I got the Sony.
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Too many lenses 😂 I had to exclude a lot, but focussed on what I’ve tested and used before be it for a short time or long. Heard a lot about the 18-300! Thanks for watching
@timothylabrecque85893 жыл бұрын
Great video and very informative. Dont you wish you had 10k to spend on gear lol. I am looking for a telephoto in the future. Tamron seems to be getting some good publicity lately. Great production work here👍
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Cheers mate! You’re right it’s so expensive, if I was mr Bezos no worries, but for now I’ll stick for sigma and discounted products 😉. Yeah Tamron have done great work, I’ve heard they’re now going to make lenses for Fuji which is great
@smalltalk.productions99777 ай бұрын
thanks for the effort and sharing. i have the 28-200 tamron and like your thinking about impactful field of view-wide and long. how are the optics on the tamron 17-28? and has dust been a problem with the sigma 100-400 as it has been for the sigma 24-70? thumbs up.
@imhopetv3 жыл бұрын
Gud morning your new followers from Philippines Sending u support nice vedio keep vlogging 98likes, 👍👍👍
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@michaelciccone3 жыл бұрын
Still been eyeing up that Sony 200-600 even though I bought the sigma 100-400 already
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Yeah dude! Get it 😊
@rafanichanells74213 жыл бұрын
Awesome 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot mate
@ChrisBaitson3 жыл бұрын
I’m expecting big things after your IG story here…. 🍿
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
😂 just a 💩 load of graphics and broll and transitions, tried to keep it visually interesting. Hope it was ok?
@nothingextra103 жыл бұрын
*_ПРИВЕТ ! HELLO ! Thanks for new video👌 13✔always HONEST from me❣ STAY BLESS MY FRIEND, WELCOME)_*
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Cheers mate
@flol32662 жыл бұрын
You speak a lot about Tamron and in my opinion you did missed the newer 17-70mm f2.8 and the classic contender against the Sony 70-200mm would be the Tamron 70-180mm f2.8
@RauriBarron2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching mate. Yeah I didn’t mention those lenses, difficult to talk about every lens in one video. Reason I didn’t mention the 17-70 is that it is for Sony APS-C, and as you know there are SO many lenses for the Sony system so to keep this video concise I kept it to Full frame lenses (as titled). As for the 70-180, a good lens too, but I thought for the same price, (although a little slower at f4) the Sony 70-200 f4 with stabilisation (unlike the Tamron 70-180) and extra 20mm reach was a better option for landscape. (Here in Aus the Tamron 70-180 is $1,999 RRP and the Sony 70-200 4 is $1,899 RRP). Hope that helps clarify my reasoning 😊 thanks again for watching mate I appreciate your comment too.
@flol32662 жыл бұрын
@@RauriBarron ah ok. Thanks for the answer. That makes sense. The Tamron 70-180 is way cheaper here in the middle of Europe.
@RauriBarron2 жыл бұрын
@@flol3266 thanks mate! Oh man, gear here in Aus generally is quite expensive. 👍 thanks again for watching
@MrRiffbear12 жыл бұрын
Whats abut the 14mm FE?
@RauriBarron2 жыл бұрын
Good lens but for me 14mm often have draw backs like the bulbous front element.
@MrRiffbear12 жыл бұрын
@@RauriBarron I think the 14FE is flat. I know the 12 is crazy
@RauriBarron2 жыл бұрын
@@MrRiffbear1 the 14 1.8 has a bulbous front element, but this video I didn’t cover primes as that would make the video at least 30 mins 😂
@MrRiffbear12 жыл бұрын
@@RauriBarron fair enough. Ya should do it! I like your energy. It’s not over hyperactive like some others, They are too tiring to watch. I just bought the Sony A1 and am loving it.
@RauriBarron2 жыл бұрын
@@MrRiffbear1 Oh that's awesome! I'd love to have the A1. My dream camera. Thanks so much for your time feedback. If you have any video suggestions to make let me know.
@iangordicans87633 жыл бұрын
re Tamron I'm not sure what a "non standard focal length" actually is
@RauriBarron3 жыл бұрын
Yes, that is also their marketing/production strategy. Standard is the “market standard” focal range that most manufactures create for full frame lenses. So for wide angle lenses for example, you’ll see a lot of 16-35/12-24, but 17-28 on a zoom is not common. But that is how they are able to get production costs down whilst keeping it at a fast f2.8 👍
@sonofnothing Жыл бұрын
Not an example of what each of these best lenses can do. Spec porn.
@imhopetv3 жыл бұрын
Gud morning your new followers from Philippines Sending u support nice vedio keep vlogging 98likes, 👍👍👍