I use that lens wots on my iphone 3

@@acecreates 😂

Nice video Rauri! :) I only use two lenses for landscape photography. A 24-70 and a 70- 200 (with a 1.4 TC that gives me 98-280mm). I do want a ultra wide lens, like a 15mm or something. But I cant afford one right now. Good job on the video. You are super pro at talking. :)

@@ThomasRaskPhoto Thanks so much Thomas. Your current lenses with the TC already makes for a great kit! I reckon as you said a wide angle prime would be great if you see yourself shooting wide a lot, I haven't done much wide angle recently which I regret. Thanks again for the support mate.

What I'm making use of is 28 by 70 lens I don't really enjoy the work

Thanks Adrian! Yeah the 16-35 2.8 is a a great lens, can’t go wrong! I do want to use it more as I’ve been stuck with the 100-400 recently 😂 thanks for watching mate

Thanks a lot for watching John! The 14-150mm seems like a great focal range too! The weight of your system is a massive pro! That’s the reason I ended up getting Fuji for my video camera… as another full frame Sony would be way too heavy. Thanks again for the support mate 😊

Thanks for being an early watcher Adrian! I really wanna try the 12-24mm too (apart from in camera stores 😂).. such a great lens! Appreciate the kind words and support on this genre of video mate.

Thanks for watching Huw - as I'm aware gear videos are not what a portion of my subscribers want to see, so I appreciate your support on this! 👍🏻 There are a lot of options for lenses in the sony world, I didn't touch on Primes as this could go on for days, and Sigma have more lenses which I could have mentioned but didn't. The Tamron 28-200 is a great option if you want to start with one lightweight lens at a great price. You're very welcome, I truly enjoy your videos and discussions as I often end up learning something new or a new way of thinking about photography or gear etc. Thanks again 😁

@@RauriBarron I've checked prices for the Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 this morning, and they are retailing around the £650 UK pounds mark. By comparison the FE24-105 f/4 G OSS (which was going to be my starter lens) is around the £800 level. Not much but every £ counts when just dipping a toe in. Thanks again, and stay safe.

Thanks mate. Interesting comparison! Both lenses are great, but I think for the money the Tamron is worth it 😊. I heard Tamron will make lenses for Fuji now too which I’m excited about. Hopefully will transfer their great autofocus abilities on the Sony to Fuji at a good price

Thanks a lot mate, I've heard so many good things about the 28-75, glad you have also enjoyed it. Thanks for watching!

Thanks a lot I’m glad you think so! Appreciate checking my video out 👍

Thanks a lot 😊 I’ve heard so many good things about Tamron, in my opinion they beat some sigma lenses as they can be super heavy 😂 which isn’t great for mirrorless. Thanks for the support

Thank you for watching Paul! Truly appreciate it as I'm aware not everyone is into gear videos. That 85mm prime is lovely! I used to have the cheaper f1.8 which was great, but sold it as I wasn't using it enough...I don't do much portrait work. Couldn't agree more about the Tamron options, I think I may picking up a wide focal range at a good price, for those long hikes to reduce the bag's weight, as Nigel Danson has done with his Nikon 24-200 I think it is? Thanks again Paul! 😁

Haha you’re a legend! 😊

@@RauriBarron Great video mate, super informative and comprehensive in regards to all potential lenses that would suit the Sony FF system. Those G master lenses are amazing but you also shed some light on relatively underrated glass that performs close or in some instances even outperforms their much more expensive counterparts. Great stuff! Cheers😉📸📷

Thanks a lot mate glad you agree on that point, the sigma and Tamron are really great for the price. I’ve considered picking up a Tamron for the long hikes due to the versatility and weight. Thanks again 😊

Thanks a lot Rob, a trinity of 2.8 is a dream haha but the weight of it isn't. I'm happy with my f4 as well, it's perfect for what I need, and having the wide angle at 2.8 is perfect for my use at night too. Thanks for checking this out.

Cheers chad!

Thanks Colin, sorry for my late reply! Have been knocked out sick 😂. Appreciate the support mate, one of the first lenses I had was tokina… pretty great glass. Haha respect to you wife 😊 the 100-400 GM is wonderful just a bit pricey for me at the time! Great kit there.

Cheers mate, took a lot of effort although I’m not sure it shows 😂 thanks for watching…

😂 thanks a lot you legend. Appreciate your kind words on the video production.. as I spent hours ripping out what little hair I have left putting this together 😆. Cheers again mate! 🙏🏼

@@RauriBarron it was worth it mate, the vid looks MINT

You made my WEEK thank you

Such a good collection mate, the Olympus range from 24 to 300 f2.8 is awesome and I bet a lot lighter than my 3 Sony lenses 😂. Definitely keen to see more content with the new Fuji. 😊 thanks for checking this out.

Thanks a lot Brian 😃

Thanks for checking this out mate despite being a canon shooter 😉 That’s awesome, 10-300 for £350 is a bargain. I’m considering getting the Tamron 28-200 as a lightweight but versatile lens for those long hikes, the price is worth it too! Thanks for watching 😊

@@RauriBarron I'm taking a friend into getting one of them tamron super zooms because it will suit him perfectly, and I'm eager to see how it performs!

Yeah that’s awesome. My dad has the 28-200 and the shots he makes from it are awesome!

Too many lenses 😂 I had to exclude a lot, but focussed on what I’ve tested and used before be it for a short time or long. Heard a lot about the 18-300! Thanks for watching

Cheers mate! You’re right it’s so expensive, if I was mr Bezos no worries, but for now I’ll stick for sigma and discounted products 😉. Yeah Tamron have done great work, I’ve heard they’re now going to make lenses for Fuji which is great

Thanks

Yeah dude! Get it 😊

Thanks a lot mate

😂 just a 💩 load of graphics and broll and transitions, tried to keep it visually interesting. Hope it was ok?

Cheers mate

Thanks for watching mate. Yeah I didn’t mention those lenses, difficult to talk about every lens in one video. Reason I didn’t mention the 17-70 is that it is for Sony APS-C, and as you know there are SO many lenses for the Sony system so to keep this video concise I kept it to Full frame lenses (as titled). As for the 70-180, a good lens too, but I thought for the same price, (although a little slower at f4) the Sony 70-200 f4 with stabilisation (unlike the Tamron 70-180) and extra 20mm reach was a better option for landscape. (Here in Aus the Tamron 70-180 is $1,999 RRP and the Sony 70-200 4 is $1,899 RRP). Hope that helps clarify my reasoning 😊 thanks again for watching mate I appreciate your comment too.

@@RauriBarron ah ok. Thanks for the answer. That makes sense. The Tamron 70-180 is way cheaper here in the middle of Europe.

@@flol3266 thanks mate! Oh man, gear here in Aus generally is quite expensive. 👍 thanks again for watching

Good lens but for me 14mm often have draw backs like the bulbous front element.

@@RauriBarron I think the 14FE is flat. I know the 12 is crazy

@@MrRiffbear1 the 14 1.8 has a bulbous front element, but this video I didn’t cover primes as that would make the video at least 30 mins 😂

@@RauriBarron fair enough. Ya should do it! I like your energy. It’s not over hyperactive like some others, They are too tiring to watch. I just bought the Sony A1 and am loving it.

@@MrRiffbear1 Oh that's awesome! I'd love to have the A1. My dream camera. Thanks so much for your time feedback. If you have any video suggestions to make let me know.

Yes, that is also their marketing/production strategy. Standard is the “market standard” focal range that most manufactures create for full frame lenses. So for wide angle lenses for example, you’ll see a lot of 16-35/12-24, but 17-28 on a zoom is not common. But that is how they are able to get production costs down whilst keeping it at a fast f2.8 👍

Thanks. What does 98 likes mean?