shots fired lol

@@BonesyTucsonmore old torpedoes kaboomed

😂 so truth

​​@@JK-gw1yfthere were 9 Nuclear submarines lost in history, 7 of them were Soviet/Russian, Americans lost 2 nuclear and 2 non-nuclear ships, these 7 ships that USSR/Russia lost are not even the half of their overall non combat loses after ww2, so for a god's sake, shut the f@ck up and just accept that Russia sucks at maintaining and operating submarines, you won't dodge that by pointing at the west and saying that they lost submarines too

@@JK-gw1yf In total the united states has lost 4 submarines since WW2, none after 1963's Thresher. In total the USSR lost 16 submarines, and Russia lost 2 after the end of the cold war. In the time between the sinking of the thresher in 1963 and the fall of the soviet union, the soviets lost 9 submarines.

thank you!

I agree he doesn't get enough credit for what he does

seconded

Wtf I didn’t even realize it was unscripted. I could never pull of content like that, Id have to spend sooo long preparing a script otherwise it would just come off as incoherent rambling

I think it's rated exactly where it should be. Writing a script and not hemming and uhhhing is not that difficult. It really sounds ass.

Artur is the biggest liar on you tube.....Russia jumped from 200,000 to 1.3 million troops and this fake channel says they had 9,000 that were not qualified? Who cares. Ukraine went from 400,000 in 2022 to 65,000 in June..and lost 45,000 in the past 3 months.....Russia has 140 million population, Ukraine had 32 million but 12 million have fled out of the country.....Ukraine has no more men to draft. This channel is full of crap and u r gullible....

Many thanks!

I hope Japan is!

@@josephpadula2283Japan’s been investing a lot in missile defense. Drone proliferation suggests we would all be wise to start investing in lightweight mobile gun systems as well. You’ll need something a little better than a Toyota will a 20 mm cannon strapped to the bed…but probably not that much more.

@@grahamstrouse1165JDM terror*st trucks lol

I find it hilarious that they've been humiliated by a country that lacks a navy. The Ukrainians have shown that drones WILL have a permanent presence on the battlefield from now on. Slava Ukraini!

@@largol33t1 I think the Russians have shown that kamikaze Lancet drones are the worst nightmare for the Ukrainian army

Erm... its Sutton, not Hutton 🧐

@@nooboftheyear7170 I think His Utton.

H I Sutton

So it'll be cool when Russia, North Korea, China, Syria, Iran, and India actually strike back. Where you at?

Noted!

It is believed the Chinese lost a nuclear sub last month.

In Cold War time were many incidents, also Britain vs Argentina

I think you mean the Gulf War as that is the most recent use of a large naval force.

USA vs Iran. Although it was really proportional

Venezuela vs that random cruise ship just recently happened

Are you American? Because if so yes it is, $125 Billion Plus for 5 Square kilometers of land gained back.

@@sinfulgrace $125B is the total US military spending on ukraine. This is equipment donations, not money, and a lot of it is hand me down equipment, surplus, mothballed, or soon to be exiting service. The number is far lower for actual equipment the US needs to replace. And it makes sense for the west to spend that money, because compared to Nato budgets, it is an absolute bargain. The total amount of recovered territory by ukraine is about 50% of what russia took, and granted gains have been slow recently, only a few dozen to a hundred square kilometers per week, but they are happening, steadily. However, that isnt all that matters. Ukraine was bleeding russia badly while russia was on their offensive, that is expected. But now ukraine is pushing and in a historical first of warfare, ukraines losses on the offensive are about 1/4 of what russias are (on the defensive)… It is a war of attrition, and Russia is being outspent 5x over and being efficiently out fought on the battlefield, while at home in russia the economy is in freefall and it lost as many able bodied men to expatriation as it managed to recruit. It is a slow grind, until it suddenly isnt, and then the russian federation will splinter into many pieces, many of which will be fighting each other.

@@sinfulgrace5 square km? LOL no Kharkiv and Kherson are massive areas. Many, many more than 5sqkm

This aged well lol. Is there a return policy on our $? We'd like a refund

@@sinfulgrace that is the budget option. If it becomes ukraine being captured, anual NATO budget will have to go back to height of the cold war gdp percentage -> $2-3 trillion increase. The budget deal doesnt last forever…

Yes. A smokescreen was added, which it was missing direly.

The Ukrainian improvement or the Russian improvement?

Speed holes. They make the sub sink faster.

​@@TonboIVI loled

Much appreciated

Welcome aboard!

Killing civilians so Zelensky can buy another mansion.

@@wadewilson6628 Cope harder, tankie 😁😁

Unus Exitus 🇷🇺. 🇬🇧😱😭🇺🇲😱😭😭🇺🇦.....💀🪦😁👍

Ucraina gallus canum...🇺🇦💀

🧐🇺🇦 Naziukropnato Mementos, Et non morieris.💀🪦

It's pretty gross that you're pro-nazï

Nothing like the sound of thunder in the storm.🤣

​@@micfail2the sub was ruzz man, the Ukrainians won this one

@@micfail2 my congratulations to Russia, for finally managing to kill a Nazi in its denazification operation. 23rd of August was one hell of a day.

@@NM-wd7kx exactly, ukrainians are the ones whose government is openly pro-nazï and has a number of Nazï officials and government organizations. I'm surprised you don't know that, they don't even try to keep it a secret. Even the legacy Media was talking about it until a couple of years ago and it's only gotten worse since then

Cool. Do you have an online presence?

That's interesting - I'd love to see your work!

These dry docks are not directly connected to the open sea. They are within the harbor and USV's would need to pass certain (probably guarded) choke points and obstructions which would make it very hard. Just check the location of these docks in Sevastopol and you'l see the barriers & choke points

@@g412bb can't forget the trained dolphins lol

You make a good point. In my country, dry docks are assumed industrial infrastructure and are afforded an order of magnitude less protection than active military ships in a Naval base. This may not be the same arrangement in Crimea. @@g412bb

Yes, the dolphins will carry the day!@@PrintScreen.

sinking the ships in a flooded dry dock. LOL ships in dry dock rest on bloks they can't sink

Welcome aboard!

So basically a single diesel sub got rekt out of 64 or how many and a landing craft.

@@cactuslietuvaRussia’s functional submarine fleet isn’t nearly that big. And the reason the the loss of the Minsk is so huge is because Ukraine is beating the hell out of the land bridge & The Kerch Bridge, the only two other options Russia has for resupply to Crimea besides the landing ships that are already in The Black Sea. So yeah, it’s a big deal.

@@grahamstrouse1165 maybe if Russia had lost Borei class then your argument has some merit. Kilo class is small diesel sub which Russia has 64. Also wouldn't Ukraine needs a navy to even attempt to attack Crimea?

​@@cactuslietuvaUA can only do a land attack. If russians in Crimea are starved of the good stuff- anything that cannot be carried by infantry- rockets, arty shells, AFV's- then a slow, grinding attack is a very feasible thing. Also, no Sub, much less 60+ of them are making past straights in Turkey on a regular basis.

@@cactuslietuva Ukraine doesnt need a navy to attack crimea, in fact they have already been attacking crimea. Modern naval warfare doesn't require a significant traditional navy. Now if russia were actively and properly patrolling with their navy fleet. This may be a different story.

You can die if you get bitten by mosquito in your sleep. I

Glad you enjoyed it

yes, scaling a totally unused rig which's taking has no strategic, tactical or practical value whatsoever must be gutting - even if the photos are indeed recent, which is certainly not proven.

Hopefully they aren’t holding the platforms.. UA doesn’t have the reach to defend such an isolated position.. would be a waste of such talented personnel

abandoned oil rig that has zero value. i mean pointless photo shoot for western media 'victories'

seems it's main goal was to deny russian use of those platforms with early warning radars, electronic warfare and reuleing/rearming point for helicopters@@gurglejug627

@@Soul-Clutch-Man They removed air defense and radars, making Crimea wide open to attacks from west.

Thank you very much!

keep in mind reparing submarine within range of enemy fire might be difficult

@@hphp31416 Absolutely. At best, it’s out for the next year or two and therefore the rest of the war. And I suspect it will be hit again eventually. But for now I wouldn’t be bold enough to call it a total loss as I’m not sure from the imagery it’s recieved a direct hit.

Which Russia doesn’t really have the capacity to do in Crimea. If they leave the Rostov in the dry dock they’re down a dry dock for the duration of the conflict. Problem is they don’t really have a way to move it in one piece, either. Submarines with big holes in them are notoriously difficult to float. They’ll probably end up having to break it up in place & salvage what they can for their other Kilos.

Kilos are diesel-electric. They’re very good d-e subs, btw. They don’t have the endurance that AIP d-e’s possess but they have a lot of hard-hitting weapons.

​@nuttywalls8190 - I cry foul because Russia invaded Ukraine. Ukraine can't really commit a foul in defending or regaining their territory as long as they stay within the laws and conventions of warfare. If the UK invades Russia then Russia would be entitled to attack London Bridge if London Bridge was being used for military purposes. So no in the same circumstances if Russia attacked London Bridge that would be reasonable. Of course the chances of Russia being able to carry out a sucessful atack against London Bridge are low. They couldn't even invade a neighbour with essentially 40 year old military technology. But it would be humourous to see them try.

@NotMe605 Russia didn't invade ukrainazia, it's a liberation of the US invasion. Since 2014, continuing today, the ukrainazis have been launching daily rocket attacks on their civilian Russian population. Thousands of children killed in schools and playgrounds with no instigation from Russia. They're just evil. The memorials for which have been scrubbed from Wikipedia. That's called propaganda. This happened AFTER THE US INVADED ukrainazia in 2014, executed the government and put in place their own puppet regime. The regions who democratically voted for independence were ignored and the attacks on civilians began. Russia sent peacekeepers but were told not to interfere. For 9 years they had to sit back and watch civilians being executed by the US, UK and NATO for simply wanting independence from Europe. The last straw was in September 2021 when NATO confirmed they would post nuclear weapons in ukrainazia. The most corrupt country in the world who had been attacking Russian civilians for 8 years, fully signed-of and approved by NATO. The Minsk agreement was signed by Germany to make ukrainazis stop the attacks. The Germans ignored the agreement for 9 years after 2 arbitrations. Europe doesn't care about its people. They flood their country with terrorists and illegal migrants, giving them everything they want while their own population starve. Or freeze because the UK and US blew up Nord Stream 2 to kill off their own people. Russia cares about Russians and freedom. They haven't even taken their gloves off yet. But you wouldn't know that because you're a fkn dent head who watches BBC Propaganda.

@@1337flite I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the United States has never fought with countries that had S 300 air defense systems. Even Iraq in 2003 did not have these air defense systems. The S-300 is capable of easily shooting down fourth-generation aircraft. There is no information about the fifth generation. So, Ukraine has the largest number of C 300 units after Russia. This automatically means that it is impossible to use aviation as the United States did in Iraq.

Eventually. Check out www.hisutton.com/North-Korea-Submarines-Compared.html and www.hisutton.com/North-Korea-Submarine-Hero-Kim-Gun-ok.html

Thank you

Thank you

Thank you!

Cheap polyester boats filled with explosives to expose hubris. I love what a big middlefinger they are.

@@theothertonydutch well they are at war but it really feels like terrorism, same as ISIS did

Not sure rusty Societ era dry duck with no worker is going to help anyone. Ukraine haven’t been able to build anything post-1990 after Soviet engineers went home

Nikolaev, not Mykolaiv.

@@jwenting "Nikolaev" - Russian translation of the Ukrainian name of the city

If they had major capabilities, why didn't they keep their own ships lol

The shipyard you speak off wast able to repair barges due to many crane mechanical issues and shortage of trained man power. The irony is that Ukraine hasnt built anything significant since the fall of the USSR. Everything they proud themselves in was built using the resoųrces of many Soviet republics. Man power , materials , brains and so on. Yet Ukrainians , to this day try to take all the credit.

Subs are fragile, any damage is serious damage.

There looks to be a piece of the sub missing.

Its a submarine, every kind of damage must be taken serious if russia dont want another kursk. Even if its not destroyed it will be taken out for months and most likly will get hit by another strike.

Once it's built, you kind of don't want your pressure vessel to be heat-treated again. I winder if the double hull might offer any protection in this case, though.

@@ropeburnsrussell I understand that and can agree that a simple pipe leak can be serious. So, I can agree on the heavy/serious assessment but lost? Extensive repairs, sure. It might be lost, but this photo can't determine that.

not to mention the time to get the wreckage out of the dock

"Most of it was made in the west" File that under "Shit I made up".

@@sinfulgrace Prove him wrong 🤣

Not particularly a "hard" time but its just anoying. Also i dont think its build in the west

Unus Exitus. 🇬🇧😱😭🇺🇲😱😭😭🇺🇦.....💀🪦😁

They *had* 4 Improved-KILO plus one original KILO, the one-off Alrosa. Now 3 + 1

And the price for that is the type US can't afford.

​@@BigSmartArmed???

@@BigSmartArmed Cope and seethe

@@rick7424 US is collapsing from the inside, and now US is directly implicated in a attack on Russian soil. Pentagon took over StarLink and used it for targeting and guidance correction to attack a Russian military port. Russia has a legal Casus Belli to begin military operations against ANY US assets anywhere in the world.

@@BigSmartArmed The US is fine. How's Russia handling it? I saw a report that due to lack of maintenance as a result of sanctions, your civilian airlines are starting to suffer. Just the other day an airplane had to land in a corn field!

That's possible when you have others gang up on you

There is no cry in war and for sure when you start the war and lose it. Shalom@@user-ii3qo6qt3s

Big jaggaboom

They have indeed been developing them, I read a news article a week or so ago where they were advertising their new sub-drone. It had a very substantial payload too, even more than their successful USVs

You mean the beginning of the end

@@Vulcano7965 Crimea might as well be an island and Ukraine seems hellbent on not letting it slide. This stuff will drag on for a while. I'd say describing it as the end of the first act isn't that far off.

Yes, haven't you heard, Russia is surrendering tomorrow, unconditional surrender, this has really shook them to their core! Ukraine wins! ... 🙄

You really want to die in a WWIII as soon as possible, don't you? Russians might as well launch all the nukes because West is so suicidal there's no point anyway.

@Vulcano7965 Nope.. they are now trapped.. The 2nd stage will involve their wholesale slaughter.. Then there will be the beginning of the end.. the 3rd stage where the few survivors are hunted down..

Glad it was helpful

it helps to have nato and the us nave do all the heavy lifting and all u have to do us push teh button on a missile battery to make it look like you fired something, ....you realize the stopry about moskva cant be true either it takes 7 or 8 missiles to overwhelm their close in weapons.... it was lost due to bad dc not anything ukraine did...

@@cultureshock5000 Yeah Ivan, cope harder!

@@mylesanhalt9155The Moskva was built in Ukraine … maybe Russia should have taken it back to Mykolayiv for a service … 😂😂😂

@@cultureshock5000 still has a hole in it though, I don't really give a shit how it got there

All Ukraine did is lying dead on the ground for journalist to take photos so Biden can still sell this war. All the intel, equipment, soldiers, planning are all NATO. My country have people volunteered to fight in Ukraine and reported it’s all mercs doing the actual heavy fighting because Ukrainian soldiers aren’t trained enough to use their own equipment let alone donated one with instructions all in English