Illuminati

It is quite fascinating that the brain is helping control this complex body yet it works in such a way that it doesn't know itself until it studies itself

@Dr Perpetuum Sure you know it now because it's in the biology books so you know what it looks like and how it functions. But someone had to study that first before they would know it no?

@Dr Perpetuum lmao alright

Jolly Potato It has no senses to examine itself, only examine others who have already died.

Explain why?

@@gravitydahiya9777 humans for the most part have what i like to call a "refresh memory" It keeps getting modified when new information is stored in relation to previous info, much like the ram if a system only has records of its last modified bits of information for example in a simple sense if it switched a one from zero, its only going to remember the one, and i am not sure if its what we can call endless storage, never ending storage maybe. You also have to consider cells can only reproduce a certain number of times before they die (hayflick limit) so the brain can not really functiion forever or refresh endless number of times even if you live forever which you are not ( ref hayflick limit) even if you dont get any diseases and live in a perfectly conditioned isolated environment...

@@gravitydahiya9777 hope that helps.....

@@mayankraj2294 Yeah what I was thinking

@@mayankraj2294 and what's about photographic/eidetic memory?

It's extremely hard to make something like that, but it could be pretty useful.

0_0

.

@@Maxgamer-fd7hv hard not impossible

@@opai1821 I didn't say that it was impossible.

Yep....just humans and the internet with just a bit better bandwidth.....

Made with graphene

Biological is not the same as neuromorphic, and why would you include binary when there are qubits.

@@ASLUHLUHCE There is a common misconception that quantum computers are superior to classical computers for any general computing task. This is not the case. A quantum computer actually performs a single operation at a much slower speed than a classical computer. Their advantage is only seen when computing quantum algorithms. For such algorithms, they are able to compute in a single step what would be an exponentially increasing number of steps on a classical computer. However, for algorithms which are essentially binary in nature, they have to perform the same number of steps that a classical computer does, and they perform those steps more slowly.

@@arik_dev Ah ok. Thanks for explaining this!

that means we are too stupid to understand it

@@AnandMishra-xs1lt hahahha

So we are always meant to not understand the brain.

It's like chasing your shadow

bruh moment

Z F right 😂

The brain is able to place things (physical or non-physical) into a focul point from which it analyzes (pulls information) --> then understands (makes connections to previously established connections) I guess the brain can also recursively put itself into its own focul point what a time to be alive, even more so for future generations, oh im so jealous of them

This is so damn true lol never looked at it like that.

The mind attempts to understand the brain. Mind !== brain

Haha yeah

No plans yet, but that's a great suggestion!

@@business Please do

😂😂😂

Are value and inspiration quantum effectsw?

BLADERUNNER

On a pound for pound measure, we are Superior and unlike machines, some of us have morals.

@AEA.PEA.OEA.2AG * To you’re second point, I’d argue that emotions are embedded type of cognition, and morals have been extensively shown to be derivative from emotion, so these computers could probably form morals if you wanted them to TLDR- emotions come from thoughts and evolution, and morals come from emotions, so computers could develop morals too

@@ToriKo_ no they can't lol. Animals who have a brain like us humans do not exhibit morals. Also, having morals is related to being conscious which animals still aren't. And we don't know how we achieved consciousness. If achieving consciousness was as simple as throwing greater and greater computing power, we would have achieved it in computers by now. We are trying to mimic that with machine learning. But machine learning is fundamentally different than the workings of our brain (that's what I think at least) so we won't ever have a general AI no matter how hard we tried. The property of consciousness which (almost) every human has is a property that is emergent in nature. We still don't know how emergence works. Btw emergence is a property where the properties exhibited by an object are different than the sum of its parts. If you think about it, all the neurons in our brain are alive, but they are not conscious. All those neurons are ultimately made up of atoms, which are not alive. So in order to engineer another consciousness, we will have to understand how emergence works in the first place. That is the one property of the universe which is consistent everywhere. But it's like a singularity (black hole), you know it's there but you can't study it.

If quantum computers are used, then it might be as big as the average human, and also smarter. Remember that it took us millions of years just to become sentient.

@@Maxgamer-fd7hv of course no one is taking evolution into account

@@Maxgamer-fd7hv I don't think that's possible. We cannot make something smarter than human brain. We haven't understood our brain let alone making something smarter. I am only saying this because this video explained about brain in the most simplest way possible. But trust me. Even in hundereds of thousands of years we cannot make something as close to the human biology. Only thing we try to do is mimic them in some way or another. And that mimicking is limited to our understanding.

@@shudra3040 computers can get smarter than humans by 2050 according to a lot of scientists. Computers have been evolving far faster than us, and with quantum computers it can be even faster.

@@Maxgamer-fd7hv depends what you consider smarter. Mere memory and information stored. Sure they will be better. But there are many many many other aspects in brain. I graduated from med school last year. Studying to be a neurologist. And when I m reading things our brains can do is just nearly impossible with machines. Let alone doing millions of different things doing simultaneously.

if your hope on humanity rises because of AI it means that you are without hope.

We are The Universe experiencing itself. So a brain trying to figure out a brain makes sense in that context.

Lmao, that's dark.

@gary proffitt You mean AGI right?

Doh!

Though, adding new "if" and predict it it's another story

@@vignettetsukinoseapril are you talking to you're self

@@opai1821 indeed

Current AI are matrices fed on a huge if function.